IR 05000352/1980018
| ML19345E065 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 10/07/1980 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Gage L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345E063 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-352-80-18, 50-353-80-16, NUDOCS 8012230041 | |
| Download: ML19345E065 (6) | |
Text
'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I 50-352/80-18 Report No.
50-353/80-16 50-352 Docket No.
50-353 CPPR-106 License No. CPPR-107 Priority Category A
--
Licencee:
Philadelphia Electric Company
_
2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Facility Name:
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection at:
Philadelphia and Limerick, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted:
September 18, 19, and 22-24, 1980 Inspectors: h
[gfb 4/ A L. Gage, Reactor Inspector
'date signed date signed date signed A" proved by:
n )-
/[
fo/7/#o S. D. Ebneter, Chief, Engineering dats signed
~
Support Section #2, RC&ES Branch Inspection Summary:
Combined Inspection on September 18,19, and 22-24,1980 (Report Numbers 50-352/80-18 and 50-353/80-16
'
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by a regional-based inspector of work activities and records associated with the documentation and implementation
.
of the General Electric Installation and Service Engineering (G.E. I&SE) Division's
'
Quality Assurance Program. The inspection involved 28 inspection hours on site and at Philadelphia Electric Company's corporate offices by one NRC regional-based inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
3g1g230
'
.
. - - -
..
. -.
-
-
.
.
...
,
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Philadelphia Electric Company
- J. Muldoon, Inspector
- P. Naugle, Construction Engineer
- C. Patton, Field Engineer H. Walters, QA Manager J. Walton, Electrical Project Engineer General Electric Company
- D. Conti, I& SED QA Supervisor
- F.
Eaton, I& SED Manager QA
- W. Neal, NEBG Resident Site Manager
- L. Piotti, NEBG QA Representative
- J. Yingling, I& SED Field Engineer Bechtel Power Company
- H. Foster, Project Field QC Engineer
- R. Lanemann, Lead Electrical Engineer
- J. Martin, QA Engineer
- D. Shaw, Electrical Engineer
- D. Thompson, Project Field QC Engineer
- M. Tokolics, QA Engineer i
- A. Weedman, Project Field Engineer U.S.N.R.C.
- J. Mattia, Senior Resident Inpsector
- Denotes personnel attending exit interview.
t l
2.
General l
The licensee has contracted with the General Electric Nuclear Energy Business Group (NEBG) for the delivery of control room equipment, including the power generation control complex (PGCC).
!
~.
.
NEBG has delivered the PGCC to the site minus certain components and with certain design changes not incorporated.
NEBG has subcontracted the comple-tion and modification work at the site to the General Electric Installation and Service Engineering Division (I& SED).
The inspector reviewed the documentation and implementation of I& SED's Quality Assurance Program.
3.
Document Review The inspector reviewed the NEBG quality assurance program requirements that were placed on I&SE:
Document #8, titled " Quality Assurance--Engineered Equipment and Installa-tion--San Jose, California," Revision 0, issued December 4, 1979.
Tne inspector then reviewed the I& SED responding documents, including the overall QA Program plan:
Document #18XA9000, "G.E. Northeast Region QA Program--Electrical," Revision 1, issued June 6,1979 as well as the more detailed implementing documents:
QA II-001, " Visual Inspection for Electrical Work to CID Panels,"
.
Revision 9, dated July 14, 1980 QA II-002, " Visual Inspection for Changes *o CID Cables," Revision 0, dated July 15, 1980 QA II-003, " Wire Check for Electrical Work to CID Panels and Cables,"
.
Revision 0, dated July 15, 1980.
QA II-004, " Visual Inspection for Soldering to Boards, Assemblies and
.
Cables," Revision 0, dated July 15, 1980 QA II-005, "Hi pot Requirements," Revision 0, dated July 15, 1980
.
QA II-006, " Material Transfer from NEBG to I& SED," Revision 0, dated
.
July 28, 1980 QA II-007, " Rubber Stamp Marking," Revision 0, dated July 28, 1980
.
QA II-008, " Observed Condition Notice (OCN)," Revision 0. dated July
.
28, 1980.
.
---
-
.
.
QA II-009, " Certificate of Compliance," Revision 0, dated July 31,
.
1980.
QA II-010, " Inspection of Engraving," Revision 0, dated August 11,
.
1980.
The inspector then reviewed the NEBG evaluation of the I& SED QA documents mentioned above:
NEBG 1etter to the site project manager, letter no. RLS-80-049, dated September 4, 1980.
No items of noncompliance were identified by the inspect'or.
4.
Observation of Work The inspector interviewed the NEBG QA representative and the I& SED QA Supervisor.
He observed the inspection and modification of the equipment.
He determined that the number of I& SED QA inspectors (two, including the supervisor) was adequate to inspect the efforts of the modification team (five electricians).
He determined that the modification team was using the same workmanship standards used in the NEBG factory:
the " Manufacturing Standard Practices Manual," Revision 54, dated July 2, 1980.
No items of noncompliance were identified by the inspector.
S.
Special Effort to Verify Equipment Configuration The inspector asked I& SED how the equipment configuration will be docu-mented when the modifications are completed and the missing (" shipped short") components are installed.
They responded that the modifications are made in accordance with engineering change notices to " baseline" drawings.
Another group of I& SED personnel are presently checking the "as delivered" equipment with the baseline drawings to insure that the baseline drawings represent the "as delivered" configuration.
The inspector interviewed the drawing-check group's leader, an I& SED field l
engineer.
(He is supported by four drafting personnel.) The group is j
presently conducting a " trial run."
NEBG will determine, at the completion of the trial, if the drawing corrections found warrant the group to perform this "as delivered" configuration check as a program task.
The inspector reviewed one of the baseline drawings that the group was checking:
number 828E224T4, Revision 4.
Several corrections were noted on the drawing.
The inspector asked the licensee if the group was performing their task in accordance with the I& SED QA Program.
The licensee stated that, since this was only a trial run, the group was not included in the QA Program. However, the I& SED QA manager stated that all of the group's work will be inspected l
_~
l I
^
l
-_..
,
by*QA and, if it was decided to expand their trial run into a program task, the work will be performed in accordance with the QA Program controls.
The inspector stated that NRC wanted to know:
(1) the results of the trial run, and (2) the NEBG decision on whether or not to expand the trial run into a program task.
The NRC Senior Resident Inspector stated that he will monitor this activity.
No items of noncompliance were identified by the inspector.
6.
Review of Licensee Audits The inspector reviewed the licensee audits of both the NEBG and I& SED QA Program activities.
He selected the following audit reports for review:
Audit No. 213, NEBG audit of November 1 and 2, 1979
.
Audit No. 201, NEBG audit of November 28-30, 1978
.
Audit No. E-045, I& SED audit (at site) of May 20-23, 1980
.
Audit No. E-041, I& SED audit (at site) of January 3-14, 1980
.
The inspector noted that finding number 213-02, in Audit No. 213 of NEBG related to an incorrect connection diagram being used in factory assembly of the Unit 2 remote shutdown panel C61-P0001.
The finding was closed by the licensee after NEBG verified that no assembly work had been performed with the incorrect diagram, which was immediately replaced with the correct diagram in factory assembly.
The inspector then reviewed the licensee's present Audit Schedule, issue number 103, dated September 7, 1980 and found that no audits nf NEBG were i
scheduled since Audit No. 213.
A subsequent NRC inspection will review their audit schedule.
-
-
,
l No items of noncompliance were identified by the inspector.
7.
Pre-Operational Testing of the Control Room Equipment The licensee stated that NEBG performed detailed testing of their control room equipment prior to shipping it to the site.
Substitute components were used during these tests in locations where the equipment was " shipped short." The inspector asked, in light of the re-installation of " shipped short" components and the modifications made at the site, if the NEBG testing that was performed prior to shipment was considered valid testing
.
..
.
of the equipment.
The licensee stated that his pre-operational test pro-gram would be considered the valid test program and it would supplement the NEBG detail testing.
The inspector stated that NRC inspections during the licensee's pre-operational test program would verify this.
No items of noncompliance were identified by the inspector.
8.
Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the end of the inspection on September 24, 1980.
The inspector summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection and the findings.
l l
l t
!
!
.
-
-g w
y 9,n--
m vw--
-
e
,-g--
g y-
,
y y