IR 05000348/1997013
| ML20199H247 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/20/1997 |
| From: | Belisle G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20199H230 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-97-13, 50-364-97-13, NUDOCS 9711260058 | |
| Download: ML20199H247 (2) | |
Text
_ _
_ _ _____ ___ _ __ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
_
_ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _
' *
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 11 Docket Nos:
50 348 and 50-364 License Nos:
NPF-2 and NPF 8 Report Nos:
50-348/97-13 and 50 364/97-13 Licensee:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company. Inc.
Facility:
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2
.
Location:
600 North 18th Street Birmingham. AL 35291-0400 Dates:
October 21-24, 1997 Inspector:
L. Stratton. Safeguards Inspector. Region II Approved by:
George A. Belisle. Chief Special Inspection Branch Division of Reactor Safety
^
i
,
i
'
-
-
{$A** eel'Qs L
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATIOIL,__
- 3" ". *E*.nMm
%,. - -
.,.
-...
.-
. -... -..
.,.
..
..
....
-
--
-
! ;
I
-
'
.
-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _-
l Farley Nuclear Plant
- NRC Inspection Report 50-348/97-13, 50-364/97 13
-
This routine announced inspection was conducted in the area of plant suyoort
)
by a regional safeguards specialist.
The specific area evaluated was tie
!
Physical Security Program for Power Reactors.
An Inspector followup Item was identified in that a portion of the
licensee's planned implementation of the newly installed biometrics i
granted June 5 ppear to meet the intent of an NRC exemption which was
'
system did not a 1995 (Section 52.1).
,
i The licensee had initiated action to obtain more substantial locking
- *
devices,for the active barriers of the Vehicle Barrier System.
However.
Inspector Followup Item 50 348. 50 364/97-02-01 will remain open pending I
the procurement and installation of the new locks and their respective covers (Section S2.5).
s The licensee added a requirement to post a degraded Vehicle Barrier
System component in Revision 0 of the NRC approved Physical Security
!
Plan (Section 52.5).
!
Three structures were added to the Vehicle Barrier Calculation that
.
were originally omitted.
The licensee concluded those structures met the requirements specified in NUREG/CR 6190 and Regulatory Guide 5.68
(Section S2.5).
Revisions to the Physical Security Plan reviewed by the inspector were
.
appropriate and did not decrease the effectiveness of the plan (Section S3.1).
!
Thelicenseeaddedthe'longtermcomkensatorypostattheServiceWater
.
Intake Structure into Revision 0 of he Physical Security Plan.
This
,
addition incorporated the Service Water intake Structure post as a part
'
of the licensee's physical protection strategy to protect the facility (Section S3.1).
.The licensee was conducting security audits in accordance with the
.
regulatory requirements specified in the Physical Security Plan (Section 7.1).
t
l Documentt*ansmmed herewith ;;;;='=;1 6nclosure(s) this document le decontroikd
&
w 4--
-
%-.-
. -. <, -,,,,.y.
sw.,-.
,
,%,-,.#44,--ww-m-%',._,-w w w n%
., w er, s
,,m4
,
,wmp,-.w,,,
-v,,
w-,-
~,, -=.,, - =
,
-