IR 05000346/1975019
| ML19319B432 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/03/1975 |
| From: | Knop R, Martin R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319B427 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-75-19, NUDOCS 8001151000 | |
| Download: ML19319B432 (8) | |
Text
.
w
_
.
,1o
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
,
REGION III
Report of Operation Inspection IE Inspection Report No. 050-346/75-19 Licensee: Toledo Edis~on Compahy Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo,' Ohio 43652 Davis-Besse License No. CPPR-80
' Oak Harbor', Ohio
'
Category:
B
.
.
Type of Licensee:
PWR (B&W) 906 MWe Type of Inspection:
Routine, announced
,
Dates of. Inspection:
October 22-23, 1975
. '\\' b 'It
'
!if.c-l,'-
.
Principal Inspector:
R. Martin (Date)
.
Accompanying Inspectors:
None
,
i Other Accompanying Personnel:
None Reviewed By:
R. C. Knop
<
Senior Inspector
.
7 ','
.-
I-Reactor Operations Branch (Date)
\\
.
.
i
'
l
\\
.
l f
l
$O0//f/qoO
.
y
-
._ _ __________ _ _______
!
.
,
,
t t
.
.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
,s
!
Inspection Summary i
Inspection on October 22-23, (75-19):
Reviewed status of preoperational test program, flushing program, and maintenance activities. Two items I
of noncompliance were identified.-
Enforcement Action l
l The following items of noncompliance were found during the inspection:
Deficiencies
A.
Contrary to Criterion VI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, the procedure revision being used to control the flushing of the Fire Protection
System was not the correct revision of that procedure.
This item is a deficiency.
j B.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and Toledo Edison Administrative Procedure AD 1823, 19 entries in the start-up Davis Besse Jumper and Lif ted Wire Logbook were not completed as required.
'
This item is a deficiency.
,
s,
/
)
\\s_ /
Licensee Action on Previous 1v Identified Enforcement Items
.
Not within scope of this inspection.
Other Significant Findings A.
Systems and Components The licensee was preparing to perform some modifications to the condenser as a result of hydrostatic testing of the unit.
.
B.
Facility Items (Plans and Procedures)
None identified during this inspection.
C.
Managerial Items
.
A new Project Start-up Engineer (T. Reddaway) has been assigned to replace the former incu=Sent (M. Parenteau). The present Project Start-up Engineer has been a member of the start-up staff at the Davis-Besse site.
,
D.
Noncompliance Identified and Corrected by Licensee
,,
.
/
\\
l (
)
None identified during thic inspection.
-
-
_,
-2-l
}r
.
s
-
.
.
.
,
E.
Deviations 7-s (
)
\\s /
None identified during this inspection.
j F.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items Not within scope of this inspection.
Management Interview
,
A.
The following persons attended the management interview at the conclusion of the inspection:
j Toledo Edison Company L. E. Roe, Vice President, Facilities Developement J. Evans, Station-Superintendent J. Lenardson, QA Manager E. Novak, General Superintendent, Power Engineering and Construction T. Murray, Operations Engineer
'
L. Stalter, Technical Engineer B. Beyer, Maintenance Engineer D. Briden, Chemist and Health Physicist D. Dean, Office Supervisor W. Green, Assistant to Superintendent 7 --
,
K. Cantrell, Operations Quality Assurance Engineer g
\\'
P. Narducci, Quality Control Engineer J. Buck, QA Staff Member
-
.
W.. Mills, Assistant Engineer Bechtel J. Heaton, Quality Control J. Landon, Start-up Flushing Coordinator B.
Matters discussed and comments were as follows:
1.
The inspector summarized his review of the flushing program and indicated that the use of an incorrect procedure revision as the control copy of the flushing procedure for the Fire Protection $ystem was an item of noncompliance.
(Section 1, of Report Details)
2.
The inspector summarized his tour of the facility and indicated that the f ailure to properly complete the Start-up Jumper and Lifted Wire Logbook entries for lifted wires 61-79 would
- be treated as an unresolved item.
(Subsequent to the management interview, the licensee was informed by the inspector by tele-phone on 10/30/75, that this would be classified as an item f3
,
\\
)
l
'
,
v-3-
.
.
f
.
-. -
- -,
>
.
of noncompliance.[ (Section 2 of Report Details)
V'
3.
The inspector indicated that he had received a briefing on the status of the Preoperational Test Program.
-
4.
The inspector indicated that he had reviewed certain activities of the QA department related to ' instructions being c'eveloped for QC personnel.
5.
The inspector summarized his findings relative to records
-
of maintenance activities being conducted.
6.
The inspector indicated that he had provided comments on several procedures to the licensee's staff.
.
e b
.
e
$
v 4-
-
-
.
.
.
- gp* *
.
m
,
-
.
s'
REPORT DETAILS (O Persons Contacted The following persons, in addition to those listed under the Management Interview section of this report, were contacted.during this inspection:
T. Reddaway, Start-up Project Engineer, Bechtel R. Zemensky, Toledo Edison Co., Assistant Engineer S. Hall, Shift Foremen, Toledo Edison Company E. Michaud, Test Program Manager Results of Inspection
.
1.
Flushing Program The inspector reviewed the status of the flushing program.
The start-up flushing coordinator maintains a set of up-to-date P&I drawings on which is recorded the progress of flushing activities.
These drawings are used for reference purposes and are not the formal documentation of flushing activities.
The formal documentation is the completed copies of the individual Cleaning Procedures (CP Series) which are implemented under the controls called for in Administrative Procedures AD 1835.0 " Instructions for Flushing Program" and AD 1835.01 " Control of System Cleanliness."
Based on a review of the marked up drawings described above, the i
-
inspector estimates the degree of completed system flushing as g
follows:
Feedwater System Approx.
5%
Turbine Plant Cooling Water 95%
"
M. U. Water Treatment 75%
"
Domestic Water 10%
"
"
Screen wash System 90%
"
-
Chlorination System 50%
"
Station Air System 75%
"
Fire Protection System 95%
Service Water System 75%
"
"
Anx Building Chilled 90%
Water System Of the above systems, only the Fire Protection and Service Water systems are considered' safety relate'd systems. The inspector determined the following information regarding the procedures in use for flushing these cystems:
Service Water System (CP6011)
Master File Copy Rev 1 (
/
s_-
-5-
.
.
r
.
,
-.
--
.
_
-
.
-
m
.
!
,
Flushing Coordinator Info. Copy Rev 1 Control Copy Rev 1
{l
.I Procedure approved in accordance with AD,1805 and commitments
'
made to the Commission regarding these procedures.
Review of control copy showed 11 minor modifications made to procedure
,
during implementation. No deficiencies were noted in the review of this par,tially completed procedure.
' Fire Protection System (CP6013)
i
,
Master File Copy Rev 2 Flushing Coordinator Info. Copy Rev 2 Control Copy Rev 1 The inspector determined that Rev 2 of this procedure had been approved in accordance with AD 1805 and commitments made to the Commission, and copies of this approved procedure was transmitted to Bechtel by memo dated July 23, 1975. These copies were routed on July 24, 1975.
Flushing of the Fire Protection System began
,
on July 28, 1975. Review of Rev 2 with Rev 1 by the inspector disclosed no essential technical differences between the revisions, but that Rev 1 had not been approved in accordance with commitments made by the licensee to the Commission.
-
The licensee was informed that the failure to utilize current, approved procedures for activities affecting quality is an item of noncomplia6ce.
,
The inspector noted certain differences in the manner in which minor
'
procedure modifications are treated for safety related and non-safety related procedurcs.
He also noted that these differences are not addressed in the AD1835.0 controlling procedure.
The licensee indicated he plans a revision to AD1835 to clarify and control these activities as well as to prevent a recurrence of the usage of incorrect p'rocedure revisions for Control Copies.
.
2.
Facility Tour
.
The inspector conducted a tour of the facilities and the following items are considered noteworthy:
During a hydrostatic test of the condenser (tube side), some a.
damage occurred to the crossover line where a bolt bracket is attached to the pipe. The extent of damage and the
-
appropriate corrective action ore still under review by the the licensee. The inspector indicated his concern that preliminary information indicates that this difficulty was related to construction personnel not following the procedure which controlled their activity.
While the condenser is not treated as a safety related component, the actions taken by the licensee
.
s_ -
-6-
,,
.
.
.
_
_
_
__
.,
...
-
m.
,
1/"'N-to assure construction personnel adherence to established
'
(,)
. procedures for safety related equipment will be reviewed by the inspector at.a later date.
.
b..
All reactor coolant pumps and motors have been set in place.
'
c.
The automated vessel inspection cpparatus (baseline inspec-tion) was being removed from the site.
d.
The inspector reviewed the station logbook, the station jumper ~ and lif ted wire log, and the tagging log.
No deficienciec were noted.
-
f e.
The inspector reviewed the Start-up Jumper and Lifted Wire Log in the control room.. He noted that lifted wire tags
.
'
61-79 were placed and restored on August 11, 1975 but that the appropriate log entries required by AD1823 were not
'
completed after restoration of the lifted wires.
Subsequent
.to the inspection, the licensee was informed that this failure to follow procedure was an item of noncompliance.
3.
Status of Preoperational Test Program The inspector received a briefing on the status of the Preoperational Test Program from the Test Program Manager.
The inspector was O
informed that the station plans to conduct the integrated SEAS test after the completion of the Hot Functional Testing sequence, and that mid-March,1976 remains the scheduled date for the start
'
of the 11FT sequence.
.
Preoperational tests anticipated in the near future include:
TP 401.01 Instrument AC Pre-op TP 401.08 250/125V DC Pre-op
)
TP 401.07 480V MCC Pre-op TP 180.01 Fire Protection Pre-op
,
4.
Preoperational QA Department Activities The inspector reviewed the current activities of the QA department relative to preoperational testing. He was briefed by the recently j
assigned Quality Control Engineer (P. Narddcci, on loan from
'
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.) on the development of Quality Control Instructions to address the activities of personnel l
under-his control. No significant deficiencies were noted in
these plans as they are presently formulated.
j
^
5.
Maintenance Department Activities T'3a inspector reviewed selected recordkeeping aspects of maintenance
\\
-7-
-
,
.
-
ar
,
,
..
-
-,
,
,-
.. -. -
l
'
s
-
.
.
'
l
.
activities being conducted at the facility and noted the following:
,-s
,
'
(
)
a.
Maintenance activities are being done under the control of (,_,/
Administrative Procedure AD1844. The procedure.is not completely approved although the licensee indicates that it is in the final stages of review.
b.
Some maintenance activities have been performed on safety -
related equipment, but the work as recorded on the Maintenance Work Orders was of a nature which could be classified as
" skill of the trade" (cleaning batteries and breakers, adjusting battery electrolyte level, etc.) The inspector indicated that maintenance on safety related systems of the type requiring Maintenance Procedures or Instructions should not be performed until AD1844 has been approved. The licensee indicated that such was his intent.
.
No significant deficiencies were noted during the inspector's review of maintenance activity records.
6.
Review of Procedures The $cspector provided the licensee with comments on the following procedures:
AD 180'7.01 Action Item Record (' ')/
AD 1807.00 Control of Conditions Adverse to Quality (,,,
AD 1844.01 Preventive Maintenance Program AD 1844.04 Lubrication Guidelines AD 1839.0 Shift Operations AD 1828.0 Personnel. Training Programs TP 130.04 Spent Fuel Cask Crane Preoperational Test TP 300.02 Reactor Pressure Instrument Preoperational. Calibration TP 300.04 Reactor Coolant Flow Instru=entation Preoperational Calibration
-
.
'
I O)
iv-8-
.
-
T
'
-