IR 05000346/1975011
| ML19319B390 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 07/03/1975 |
| From: | Fisher W, Greger L, Miller D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319B382 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-75-11, NUDOCS 8001150967 | |
| Download: ML19319B390 (6) | |
Text
--
,
-.
- -- -.-- --- -..
O UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECIION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report of Preoperational Radiological Protection Inspection IE Inspection Report No. 050-346/75-11 i Asb Licensee:
Toledo Edison Company
[Dj M i[$3 Ii Edison Plaza (Dj
,
300 Madison
.
Toledo, Ohio 43652
.
-
Dwis-Besse Nuclear Power Station License No. CPPR-80 Unit 1 Category:
B Oak Harbor, Ohio Type of Licensee:
BW - PWR, 871 MWe O
Type of Inspection:
Routine, Announced Dates of Inspection:
June 18 and 19, 1975 k
7/O!7T Principal Inspector:
D. E. Miller F
' (Date)
L$1-
,4
'
!
Accompanying Inspector:-
L. R. Greget er (Date)
Other Accompanying Personnel:
None f[7f Reviewed By:
W. L. Fishe Senior Health Physicist (Date)
Facilities Radiological Protection Section O
8conso f 7
...-..
.
.-.
.
-
.
,
_
__
_ _ _ _ -
-
..
'
,e
.
O SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Inspection Simunary Inspection on June 18 and 19, 1975:
Reviewed status of radiological protection procedures, facility preparation, and training program.
Enforca==nt Items: None.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Items None within the scope of this inspection.
Other Significant Items
'
,
-
A.
Systems and Components None.
B.
Facility Items None.
C..
Managerial Items None.
.D..
Noncompliance Identified and Corrected by Licensee None.
E.
Deviations None.
F.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items No previously reported unresolved items within the scope of this inspection.
P.
s Management Interview The inspectors conducted an interview with Messrs. Evans, Briden, Scott, and other members of the licensee's staff at the conclusion of the inspection on June 19, 1975.
i-2-
,
.
,
. - - -.
~
-
,
_ _.
.
.
_ _ _ _ _ _
~
.
_
. _ _ _ _
___
.,
S
.
A.
The inspectors noted the current status of development of chemistry and health physics related procedures.
(Paragraph 6, Report Details)
B.
%e licensee stated that standardization of terminology with respect to the chemistry and health physics procedures would be reviewed.
(Paragraph 6, Report Details)
C.
The inspectors noted the radiation protection training which had been conducted since the preceding inspection.
(Paragraphs 4 and 5, Report Details)
D.
The licensee stated that the control of personal exposures to air-borne radioactive concentrations would. be addressed in radiation protection procedures.
(Paragraph 6, Report Details)
$
e
.
o O
..
\\
l
?-
(
-3-
.
.
-.
.
- -. - - -.
,
-.
- - -
~
.
,
.
REPORT DETAILS n
!v)
1.
Persons Contacted J. Evans, Station Superintendent D. Briden, Chemist and Health Physicist R. Scott, Associate Technical Assistant (TECO)
R. Franklin, Training Coordinator 2.
General The licensee's administrative and procedural controls for implemen-tationof the radiation protection program were anmined during this inspection. This examination included a review of the management control aspects, including organizational structure, responsibilities and authorities. The status of radiation protection training activit-ies, facility construction, and instrrment and equipment acquisition
-
was also enmined.
3.
Organization The licensee's Chemistry and Health Physics Department organization ra==4na unchanged from the previous radiation protection inspection.
The two remaining unfilled positions in the department, Assistant Chamiatry and Radiation Testor and the recently created Assistant (-]
Chemist-Health Physicist, are expected to be filled within tha next few months.
The Chemistry and Health Physics Daparment, when fully staffed, will include twelve personnel.
Back shift
'
chemistry and health physics coverage is expected to be provided by appropriately trained operations personnel.
'
4.
Chemistry and Health Physics (CSHP) Department Training Since the last report of training,1/ chemistry and radiation protec-tion personnelwere given about sixty-five hours of training in the following general areas.
a.
Radiation fundamentals review.
b.
Legal and regulatory aspects of radiation.
c.
Radiation monitoring.
c.
,
d.
Personnel exposure monitoring.
.
e.
Radiation protection.
I f.
Water systems and chemistry.
p)
JJ IE Rpt No. 050-346/75-04.
tV-4-
- - - - - ---
.
-
'
.
.
-
m
,
.
_1 _______
,
.s
'
g.
Radiochemistry, s
h.
Waste disposal.
This training was conducted by the C&HP.otaff and by General Physics Corporation. The licensee stated that testing was performed to deter-mine the adequacy of the training methods and the level of under-standing of the participants.
The i' spectors discussed proposed methods a
of training new employees with the licensee and will review such training during future inspections.
Testing methods will also be ar==ined during a subsequent inspection.
5.
Other Training The inspectors presented their comments on administrative procedure I
.
AD 1828.03 " General Orientation Training" to the Training Coordinator
-
and discussed the plans for future implementation of this procedure.
The licensee is presently conducting classroom training, including basic radiation safety instruction which should satisfy that portion of the general orientation training requirements.
Approximately one third of station staff has completed this training.
6.
Radiological Protection Procedures b
The inspectors reviewed the status of procedure development including an -4 nation of the specific ppcedures received during the previous.
radiation protection inspection.-
Comments on these procedures were
~
given to licensee personnel during this inspection.
No major discrep-ancies were noted. The inspectors did note that further effort is necessary in the general area of uniform
of terminology utilized in the various procedures. Licensee pers : :.el indicated that termi-nology standardization would be pursued uaring future procedure revisions.
The following radiation protection related procedures hed been finalized since the previous inspection.
" Radiation and Airborne Radioactivity Areas" (HP 1601.04)
" Protective Clothing" (HP 1605.01)
-
l
" Respiratory Equipment" (HP 1605.02)
Additionally, the licensee had completed a Radiation Protection
'
W= = 1 The procedures and manual were cursorily reviewed during the inspection; no major discrepancies were noted. The need for fi 2f Ibid.
V l
-
-5-
.
- =4-g=wne = m mee 6-y,
.
'
t
.
-
maintaining control of airborne exposure; including noble gases, was discussed with the licensee.
The licensee indicated tha* the subject would be addressed in a procedure. These items will be examined in further detail during a subsequent inspection.
~
7.
Facilities and Equipment A tour of the maj'r radiation protection related facilities was conducted o
No discrepancies from FSAR descriptions were noted, but incomplete construction activities prevent. a final determination of facility adequacy at this time. The licensee had not yet received radio-chemistry laboratory or survey instrumentation.
These items will be ermained during a subsequent inspection.
Licensee personnel indicated that a final determination on usage of high radiation area control mechanisms had not been reached.
Present Itcensee intentions are apparently to seek relief from the access control requirements of 10 CFR 20.203.c.2 for certain high radiation areas. This item
',
will be ar==4ned further during a subsequent inspection.
_
O s#
=. ~
]
(_/
-6-l
- -
_ _ _.. _....
.
.
'
'
- -
_
-
-
_
_
- ---