IR 05000346/1975009

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-346/75-09 on 750519-22.Noncompliance Noted: Inadequate QA Program Review,Failure to Promptly Correct Conditions Adverse to Electrical Const, & Seismic & Electrical Separation Requirements Not Written Into Specs
ML19326A447
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/1975
From: Hayes D, Jablonski F, Sutton J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19326A444 List:
References
50-346-75-09, 50-346-75-9, NUDOCS 8002040605
Download: ML19326A447 (11)


Text

fn.

%);,, a

..-

-.-

a.

.

t

.-

-

.

',.

-

.

.

,

,

'

'

.

.

.

.

.

,

-

.

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR RECUL* TORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENTORCDENT

,

,

REGION III

,

,

.

Report of Construction Inspection

\\

.

I

'

-

.

.IE Inspention Report No. 050-346/75-09

-

-

.

.

.

Licensee:

Toledo Edison Cc=pany

.

300 Madison Avenue

.

.

Toledo, Ohio 43652

'

.

~

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station License No. CPPR-80 Oak Harbor, Ohio Category:

B

.

'

Type of Liet.asee:

PWR (B&W) 872 We

-

.

"

Type of Inspection:

Special, Unannounced

.

.

Dates of Inspection:

May 19 - 22, 1975

-

Iu b'" k'

Principal aspector:

.

.

(Date)

.

,

3p.pd-se

Accompanying Inspectors: F. J. Jablonski S -/ ~7~ 7 I (Date)

..L

'

-

Y' /7' 7I K.

. Naidu (Date)

~

,

,

'

'

Ce.w

-

b- /.7-73~

.

C. Et ones (Date)

.

.

.

Other Accompanying Personnel: None

-

-

[//7[7[

Reviewed By:

D.

y Senior Inspector

/ (Date)

~

Construction and Engineering

Support Branch

'

,

,

.

.

,

,- * Attachment 1

,

,

8 0 02 0 4(ht>$

I

.

..

..

.

..

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

-

-v

..

.

.

,

..

-

-

.

... -

-

.

,,

.

,

,

'

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

,

.

'

-

.

.

s

.

-

..

Inspection Summarv

'

-

.

,

.

Rev?ewed i

Inspection of May 19-22, 1975 (75-09):

Special-Electrical, cable installation records and observed cable, raceway and support installatio'ns. Five (5) items of nonco=pliance were identified:

inadequate review of QA program; failure to translate seismic and electrical separation requirenents into specifications and procedures; failure to perform electrical inspections in accordance with procedures;

,.

acceptance of cable routing cards when cables were determined to have

'

been incorrectly routed; and failure to promptly correct conditions adverse to electrical construction.

.

.

,

.

.

.

Enforcement Action

-

.

.

A.

Items of Noncompliance 1.

Violatiens

,

,

Contrary to 10 CFR Part 50," Appendix 3, Crtierion II, the licensee has not reviewed the status, adequacy and i=ple=ent-

.

ation of the Quality Assurance Program.

Specific Items of Noncompliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix 3, criteria III, V,

-

XIV, and XVI, when tiewed ecliectivel, indicate a braak down

/

.

,

in managenent and procedural controls with respect to

maintenance of an effective-Quality Assur nee Program.

.

(Report Details, Paragraph 4)

This violation was identified by the inspectors and had the

,

substantial potential for causing or contributing to an item with safety significance.

"

2.

Infractions

-

~

Contrary to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 3, Criterion III,

'

s.

requirements relative to seismic support of electrical

-

-

conduit and cable separation criteria have not been translated into specifications, procedures, and instructions.

(Report Details; Paragraph 3.a)

=

.

..u

,

.

-2',

-

.

.

e

.

.

-..

,

'

.

,

.

.

,

-

  • g