IR 05000344/1981024
| ML20032A872 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/06/1981 |
| From: | Willett D, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032A870 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-344-81-24, NUDOCS 8111020491 | |
| Download: ML20032A872 (5) | |
Text
.
~
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION V
Report No.
50-344/81-24 Docket No.
50-344 License No.
NPF-1 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Portland General Electric Company 121 S. W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204
__
Facility Name:
Trojan Inspection at:
Rainier, Oregon Inspection conducted:
August 17-26, 1981 Inspectors:
sunA bNd A
/6-5- 5 /
nisJ.Widett,ReactorInspector
9*
Date Signed Approved by:
dh hh. 8 /ff/
G. ht49, Chi @, i eactor Project Section 1, Date Sig'ne'd R
Reactor Operations Projects Branch Summary:
Inspection on August 17-26, 1981 (Report No. 50-344/81-24)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of plant operations, surveillance testing, physical security, maintenance, and housekeeping.
The inspection involved 36 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC Regional Inspector.
Results:
No items of concampliance or deviations were identified.
{
RV Form 219 (2)
L
-
,
.
'
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- C. P. Yundt, General Manager
- R. P. Barkhurst, Manager, Operations & Maintenance C. A. Olmstead, Manager, Technical Services 0. Scheel, Maintenance D. Nelson, Maintenance
- D. Honaker, Maintenance Planner / Scheduler
- H. J. Caballero, Safety Coordinator
- M. R. Snook, Senior Quality Assurance / Quality Control Inspector
- D. L. Bennett, Control & Electrical Supervisor
- J. D. Reid, Manager, Plant Services J. Dunlap, Operational Quality Assurance
- P. A. Morton, Quality Assurance Supervisor The inspector also interviewed and talked with other licensee employees during the course of the inspection.
These included shift supervisors, reactor and auxiliary operators, maintenance personnel, plant technicians and engineers, and quality assurance personnel.
- Denotes those attending the exit interviews.
2.
Housekeeping / Cleanness
'
The following Administrative Orders-(A0s) and Maintenance Procedures (MPs) pertaining to housekeeping and cleanliness were reviewed:
A0-10-1, Plant Safety and Housekeeping
'
A0-7-2, Reporting Reguirements
.
MP-3-5, Cleanliness-Control
.
PS-7 (Plant Safety), Welding, Cutting, and Brazing These documents were reviewed to verify that administrative controls for general housekeeping had been established which include:
a.
Establishment of housekeeping zones.
b.
Control of housekeeping during maintenance and construction activities.
c.
Criteria for identifying and defining zone cleanliness.
d.
Requirements for cleaning safety-related components and systems.
e.
Establishment of cleanliness classification for plant systems.
. -
-
-
-.
-
.
-
-
..
-
-2-
'
The procedures were reviewed against the guidance contained in ANSI Standard N-45.2.3, " Housekeeping During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," ANSI N-45.2.1, " Cleaning of Fluid Systems and' Associated Components:During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," and' ANSI N-18.7, " Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants, Section 5.2.10."
The following areas of concern were expressed to the licensee's management:
Housekeeping
~
a.
No definition of plant housskeeping zonesfas outlined by
~
ANSI N-45.2.3,and ANSI N-18.7, Section 5.2.10. (81-24-04)
b.
No cleanlin7ss' acceptance cr.iteria'for plant housekeeping zones as outlined by ANSI.N-45.2.3 an'd NSI N-18.7, Section 5.2.10.
(81-24-05)-
The above items, a and b, are considered unresolved.
The following items, c, d, and e, are considered open items and will be reviewed during subsequent inspections, c.
PS-7 (Plant Safety Procedure) should be referenced in Maintenance Procedures for welding. ' (81-24-01)
d.
A0-10-1, " Plant Safety and Housekeeping Procedure," should reference MP 3-5, " Cleanliness Control Procedure." (81-24-02)
e.
Monthly Housekeeping Report - After housekeeping problems are identified, there is a lack of corrective action reporting to management.
(81-24-03)
3.
Maintenance-The following A0s and MPs relating to maintenance were reviewed:
A0-1-4, Operations and Maintenance Requests A0-3-9, Maintenance Requests A0-3-14, Safety-Related Equipment Outages A0-3-15, Temporary Procedures A0-5-1, Plant Changes and Alterations A0-5-3, Spare Parts Equivalency Evaluation Procedure A0-7-1, Plant Records
-
. -
- -
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
- - -
- - -.
-
- -
-
- - -
-
-3-
-
~
A0-12-5, Emergency Procurement of Quality-Related Replacement Parts
-
or Services MP-4-1, Maintenance Records, Forms and Drawings MP-3-8, Mechanical'and Electrical Preventive Maintenance Program
~
These documents were reviewed to. verify that administrative controls for maintenance activities' have been established,. including:
'
a.
Procedures for initiating requests.
b.
Criteria and responsibilities for review and approval of maintenance requests.
,
c.
Criteria and responsibilities for designating maintenance activities as safety /non-safety.
d.
Criteria and responsibilities have been established for inspection and functional testing of maintenance activities.
These procedu'res were reviewed against the guidance contained in ANSI Standard N18.7, Sections 5.2.7 and 5.2.18, ANSI N45.2.3, and ANSI N45.2.1.
In addition to the procedural reviews, maintenance activities including both preventive and corrective maintenance were observed by the inspector. The inspector verified the proper approvals, system clearances, tests of redundant equipment, and dual verification of system lineups. During the actual performance of maintenance, the inspector checked for proper radiological controls and housekeeping.
Upon completion, the inspector verified that the system was properly tested and returned to service.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Independent Inspection During this period, the inspector observed control room activities to verify the licensee's adherence to limiting conditions for
'
operations as prescribed in the facility technical specifications.
Logs, instrumentation, recorder traces, and other operating records
.
were examined to obtain information on plant conditions, trends,
'
and compliance with regulation ~s.
On the occasions when a shift turnover was in progress, the turnover of information on plant status was observed to determine that all pertinent information was
.
relayed to the oncoming shift.
During this period, the inspector toured the accessible areas of the facility to observe the following items:
,
,
.m*
-
-
-,,.-,..~.
,,,______,,,,---,#_,.
..-.,,
,,
y--,,
,,,~
,-, -.
-
.
..
..
.
_4
'
.
a.
General plant and equipment conditions.
~
b.
Maintenance requests and repairs.
c.
Fire hazards and fire fighting equipment.
d.
Ignition sources and flammable material control.
5.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations.
Unresolved items disclosed during
"
the inspection are discussed in Section 2.
6.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)
,
at.the conclusion of the inspection on August 26, 1981.
The scope and findings of the inspection were discussed and summarized as set forth in Paragraphs 2 through 4.
c t
t
a
- ..
i. *
,
a
p
. 4
^
g_
_
&
/ -
,
'@ -
.g
>
s
_W-
.%$
, - - - - _ _ - -. -... _ - - _ _ _. _ _ - -. _ _. _ - - _ - - _ _
.-
-.
. -.
.
-..
-
.
.-
- - -
. - -
-