IR 05000344/1981014

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-344/81-14 on 810513-20.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preparations for Refueling, Refueling Activities,Pump & Valve Inservice Insp & IE Bulletin & Circular Followup
ML20004D895
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/1981
From: Carlson J, Sternberg D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20004D892 List:
References
50-344-81-14, NUDOCS 8106100277
Download: ML20004D895 (3)


Text

.

,

.

.

U. C. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0ff4ISSION G

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION V

Report fio. 50-344/81-14 Docket !!o. 50-344 License No.

NPF-1 Safeguards Group Licensee: Portland General Electric Ccmpany 121 S. W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Facility Name: Trojan Inspection at: Rainier, Oregon Inspection conducted: May 13-20, 1981 Inspectors f g/

J. D. Carlson, Reactor Inspector Date Signed Date Signed y

/

Approved b

c.

v-D. H. Sternberg, Chief

/

Date Signed Reactor Projects Section 1 Sumary:

Inscectiori on May 13-20, 1981 (Report No. 50-344/81-14)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspectic; of Preparations for Refueling; Refueling Activities; Pump and Valve Inservice Inspection and Bulletin /

Circular followup. The inspection involved 52 inspector hours onsite by one NRC inspector.

Results : No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

-

RV Fonn 219 (2)

8106100'17 7

-

,

'

.

.

,

,

.

..

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted

  • C. P. Yundt, General Manager
  • R. P. Barkhurst, Manager, Operations and Maintenance
  • J. D. Reid, Manager, Plant Services
  • C. A. Olmstead, Manager, Technical 52 vices
  • H. R. Sager, QA Supervisor
  • R. P. Schmitt, Engineering Supervisor
  • B. Dixon, Oregon DOE The inspector also interviewed other licensee employees during the course of the inspection. These included plant staff, engineers and licensed operators.
  • Present at Exit Interview.

2.

Preparations for Refueling The inspector complettd the review of licensee preparatiens for refueling.

The inspection was conducted in two %ses:

1) receipt of new fuel and 2) review of refueling and fuel

,,4ction procedures. The senior resident inspector conducted the review of new fuel receipt and storage (see report no. 50-344/81-08). The project inspector reviewed the

-

following procedures and verified they were consistent with the criteria

.

of ANSI N18.7-1976:

FHP T-12: Refueling Procedure for Cycle III-IV FHP T-13: Spent Fuel Inspection Procedure for Cycle III-IV Additionally, the inspector verified an NRR approved technical specification change describing the revised core physics / design parameters was issued for Cycle IV.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

3.

Refueling Activities Prior to actual fuel handling, the inspector verified all surveillance testing required by technical specifications was completed and the results were satisfactory for comencing fuel handling operations.

Additionally, the inspector verified all preregrisites were completed prior to actual fuel movement.

During the actual fuel handling operations, the inspector witnessed two shifts cf fuel movement operations in containment and spent fuel pool area. The inspector verified periodic testing required by technical specifications was being conducted, containment integrity was being maintained, housekeeping was adequate, and licensee's shift staffing was correct.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

.

.

'

.

.

..

.

-2-

Followup on TMI Committments Based on discussion with the licensee and review of the licensee requalification training program, the inspector verified NUREG-0737 requirements were implemented as follows:

I.A.2.1 Modify Training (closed):

Item C.1, C.2 and C.3 of Enclosure 1 require the licensee's requalification program to be modified to include:

1) training in heat transfer, a degraded core, 2)ynamics, and mitigation of accidents involving fluid flow, thermod modifying the criteria for passing to require 80%

overall and 70% each category, 3) additional control manipulation criteria.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

5.

Pumo and Valve Inservice Insnection (ISI)

The inspector reviewed the licensee's program for Inservice Testing for Pumps and Valves that was submitted in 1979 and approved on an interim basis by an NRR letter on June 10, 1980. Subsequently, the licensee's program has been given full approval by issuance of amendcent 61 to the technical specifications on May 8,1981. The inspector commenced the review of the pregram implementation procedures. The Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Pump ISI Procedure was reviewed against the licensee's program and the ASME Code Chapter XI, Section IWP criteria.

Results of the review were satisfactory. The inspector attempted to review the implementation procedure for the ISI testing for the RHR system valves.

It was determined the implementation of the valve

testing program had not been completed. The procedures had been prepared and were awaiting the Plant Review Board approval.

In the exit interview, the licensee commited to fully implement the Punp and Valve ISI Program by July 1,1981(81-14-01).

No itens of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6.

Exit Interview

,

The inspector met with the licensee's representatives denoted in paragraph 1 on May 20, 1981. The scope and findings of 'he inspection were discussed.

.

b w-