IR 05000317/1987028
| ML20153B443 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1988 |
| From: | Bailey R, Keimig R, Lancaster W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20153B435 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-317-87-28, 50-318-87-29, NUDOCS 8803220147 | |
| Download: ML20153B443 (8) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:2U9I5" D EY : ~ i p.. Yriont$ _ ap" - _.
(51CLL (EUZ) - _see: xm..a1 J. f f) ( 0.T.GI2/dICG) (pp,rg) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
50-317/87-28 Report Nos.
50-318/87-29 50-317 Docket Nos.
50-318 DRP-53 License Nos. DPR-69 Licensee: Baltimore Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 1475 Baltimore, Maryland 21203 Facility Name: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Lusby, Maryland Inspection Conducted: December 15-18, 1987 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: February 17-20, 1987 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspectors: of o24-88 ' R'. J. Bailey, Ppical Secu(fty Inspector date A -2b W i A m W. K. Lincaster, Physica,1/ Security Inspector date Approved by:
.& 2 -2 u I R. R. Keintig( Chief, Safeguardg Section date Division of Radiation Safety /and Safeguards
) Inspection Summary: Routine, Unannounced, Physical Security Inspection on l December 15-18, 1987 (Combined Inspection Nos. 50-317/87-28 and 50-318/87-29)
! Areas Inspected: Followup on Security Program Event Reports and previously identified violations; Management Effectiveness; Security Program Audit; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers (Protected and Vital Areas); , Followup on NRC Regulatory Effectiveness Review Findings; Lighting; Access i Control (Personnel, Packages and Vehicles); and Training and Qualification l Program.
Results: The licensee was in compliance with the NRC-approved security program plans in the areas inspected.
8803220147 880304 PDR ADOCK 05000317 G PDR - J
. - , DETAILS 1.
Key Personnel Contacted L. Gibbs, Nuclear Security General Supervisor L. Blankenship, Supervisor, Security Training M. Cox, Supervisor,. Support Services - A. Butler, Supervisor, Security Screening T. Harris, Nuclear Security Supervisor D. Dean, Security Training Specialist The inspector also interviewed other members of the licensee's proprietary security force.
2.
Followup on Previously Identified Violations (Withdrawn) Violations (50-317/86-04-01 and 03, and 50-318/86-04-01 and 03): Failure to follow security event reporting procedures and failure to test all intrusion detection devices.
The inspectors determined, based upon information provided by the licensee in the response to the violations that the licensee was not in violation of the NRC-approved physical security plan. Additionally, to avoid confusion in the future, the licensee clarified the wording in the associated procedures.
3.
Followup on Security Program Event Reports The inspectors reviewed records and discussed three security events, reported to NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 73.71, which occurred on March 14, October 28 and October 29, 1987.
Two of the events involved equipment failure on vital area doors and the third event involved the loss of emergency power to security systems while maintenance was being performed on other plant systems.
The inspectors determined that the licensee took timely and appropriate compensatory and corrective actions with respect to all three events.
4.
Management Effectiveness The inspectors were informed of the following actions undertaken by the licensee to enhance the effectiveness of the security program at Calvert Cliffs since the last inspection: The licensee intends to purchase a new security computer and - associated access control devices and equipment in July 1988.
A new, well equipped, firing range was constructed on owner - controlled property and is currently in use, b a
. . .
Quality Assurance auditors received training on March 25-27, 1987 to - enable them to conduct more effective audits of the security program.
5.
Security Program Audit The inspectors determined that the annual security program audit had been recently conducted but that the final report was not yet available.
The results of the audit will be reviewed by the inspector during a future inspection.
6.
' Testing and Maintenance The inspectors observed maintenance technicians conducting calibration and detection tests of a perimeter intrusion detection system zone and security force personnel conducting tests of the search equipment located in the Main Gate at the beginning of each security shift change. All tests were conducted in a satisfactory manner in accordance with established procedures.
7.
Physical Barriers (Protected Area) The inspectors observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the protected area in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan. An inspector requested test of the perimeter intrusion detection system was conducted during the hours of - darkness on December 16, 1987, and the re:" cf the test were satisfactory.
The inspectors also observed that the licensee had installed a vehicle restraint device at the main vehicle gate.
8.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspectors conducted a review of the actions taken by the licensee, since the last inspection, in response to the findings of the NRC Regulatory Effectiveness Review (RER).
The inspection findings are as follows: a.
References: RER Report, Part II, paragraph 2.2.1; Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/318-86-04, paragraph 8a; and 87-02, paragraph 5.a.
i ,;; l . ,, - < - - , _ ,
- .
vt- , '
1 '*J ,.,, [.. . {~* I
F h!", . . . -
Tl,. !:.. .-., ,e .,... > c. e,. m.n.. r,0 S .. . e. a i. u , .... l,., c t,,....,,,m... c ... - - c.s r m. -i > b a,i..n..g p, .a v. c. v,. ;. -.. c c c. - gr e.., r ., a. o v.n. a ll<t . ..i.
f '* T 9 f 1 ))d'1 t. t. 4 .a . b.
References: RER Report, Part II, paragraph 2.3.1; Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/318-86-04, paragraph 8c; and 87-02, paragraph 5.b.
Ti!!'; nu,,.,, ps o'r0. :l,.'., ; n;' *., ',COll T;' p..r.e> e, 3,;r mygnyg ., - DIM'r;3:;;;;, c ,, . a :,, : T F03 pyg9., Lcn or.h:' ' ' icc W llI'0*.n,n't'[ )' 'iv a,: , I
. $
s THIS Pt,iw-imi c0llTAlflS S AFECUARDS NIF03,'AT:0: '"" lS NOT F0f!FUBLIC D!SCl OSUP.I., ii iS INTEMI!ONALLY LEFT Bl?iHX.
The inspectors concur with the licensee's assessment and additional actions. However, this matter remains open pending documentation of the commitment to conduct further testing.
c.
References: RER Report, Part II, paragraph 2.2.2; Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/318-86-04, paragraph 8.g; and 87-02, paragraph 5.d.
Ti!!S FAPM""" CON f.tdHS SAFEGUARDS HiF0P"l.i:f.' "!C :S NOT FOR PUBLIC D!SCLOSUM,!T lS !NTENT!ONALLY LETIPLANK.
This matter remains under consideration by NRC and will be reviewed during future inspections of the security program.
d.
References: RER Report, Part II, paragraph 2.3.5; Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/318-86-04, paragraph Sc; and 87-02, paragraph 5.e.
T;"^ i' ';c v [[ q v!gs . . NNIL h.~} U;] P,Ijd[j] ' D!SI;U
- i.', 6
- d,:.'O N A L L'/
' LU T !Al Nc., , , .,.. _ _ _ _. _ _ . - - - , _ _ _. - _ _. _ _ ~. - _. - ~. -, -. _ _
. s .
THis Paar'"'n r:pHIA!NS SAFEGUMDS . INTCPMn ; ' S 13 NOT FOR PUBLIC Dl5Cl05i;q, O C !NIEND0h'MLy L ETI Bl; INK.
. . This matter remains under consideration by NRC and will be reviewed during future inspections of the security program.
e.
References: RER Report, Part II, paragraph 2.3.4; Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/318-86-04, caraoraoh 10: and A7-02, naranranh 5 f.
Tills oAi:ASm:' CC!iT'liiS SATECUARDS INin'WT" ':' ' N M91 T OR PUDUC DISCLfiSU?.C. :I . NIEfff:0NAllY LEF i at ;NS.
. This item is considered to be resolved.
f.
References: RER Report, Part II, paragraph 2.3.3; Cornbined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/318-86-04, paragraphs 9 and 11; and 87-02, paragraph 5.1.
TiUT, ;"'t " CDNT A:NS SAFEGUMDS INin:MlTG." ', s pgi fan pugtjg D15Cl 05tF,E, !T iS INTENil0NALLY LEH ELANX.
This matter is considered to be resolved.
g.
References: RER Report, Part II, paragraph 2.3.2; Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/318-86-04, paragraph 8d; and 87-02, paragraph 5.c.
T;'15 Pt r " ' ""i AiNS S ATEGU ARDS
- u7g mr - - epg]FenPUBUC OlSCI OS
- c.i !I'. UIENI'CNALLY LE?! DUdin.
.-. .. .. . ... . .. - -. . _.
. .
Inspector's Observations: The inspectors verified that the licensee's corrective action, as discussed in the referenced inspection report, addresses the concerns found during the RER and that no further action is required by the licensee.
This item is considered to be resolved.
9.
Lighting The inspectors conducted a tour of the isolation zones and the protected area during the hours of darkness on December 16 and 17, 1987, accompanied by representatives of the licensee.
The inspectors found and observed that the areas were illuminated as committed to in the NRC-approved physical security plan.
No discrepancies were noted.
10. Access Control (Personnel) The inspectors observed that the licensee's access control procedures were as committed to in the NRC-approved physical security plan.
The licensee conducted an emergency accountability drill between 8:15 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on December 17, 1987.
The inspectors observed members of the security force perform their required tasks and observed that security management directed the security force in a professional manner.
No discrepancies were noted during the conduct of the drill.
11. Training and Qualification Program The inspectors conducted a review of the training files for fiftcen security personnel. No discrepancies were noted.
The records were well organized and maintained for easy retrieval. Training facilities and office space were observed to be well-organized and clean.
12.
Physical Barriers (Vital Areas) The inspectors toured several vital areas and, with the exceptions noted in paragraph 8a, b and c, found them to be in accordance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.
13. Access Control (Packages) The inspectors observed packages and materials entering the protected area being searched as required.
Based upon these observations, it was determined that the licensee was in compliance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.
,. .- -_ _ _ -.. _. _ _ _ - _ _ .-.__ _ _ . ,--_-_ _.-- -,_ -.
. .
- 14. Access Control (Vehicles)
The inspectors observed vehicles entering the protected area being searched and controlled as required. Based upon these observations, it was determined that the licensee was in compliance with the NRC-approved physical security plan.
15.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with the licensee representatives indicated in paragraph 1 at the completion of the inspection on December 18, 1987, and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
No written material was provided to the licensee during this inspection.
. l l l , ,.. _..., _ . _. _..... _ - _ _ - _ - - _ _ _,, _. - -... _ _ _ - - - - -. - - - - - - - _ - - -. - - - - - }}