IR 05000313/2019011
| ML19276E481 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear |
| Issue date: | 10/02/2019 |
| From: | Geoffrey Miller Division of Reactor Safety IV |
| To: | Richard Anderson Entergy Operations |
| Azua R | |
| References | |
| IR 2019011 | |
| Download: ML19276E481 (12) | |
Text
October 2, 2019
SUBJECT:
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNITS 1 AND 2 - BIENNIAL
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION
REPORT 05000313/2019011 AND 05000368/2019011
Dear Mr. Anderson:
On August 22, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a biennial problem identification and resolution inspection at your Arkansas Nuclear One Units 1 and 2, and discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. Brian Patrick and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
The NRC inspection team reviewed the stations corrective action program and the stations implementation of the program to evaluate its effectiveness in identifying, prioritizing, evaluating, and correcting problems, and to confirm that the station was complying with NRC regulations and licensee standards for corrective action programs. Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that your staffs performance in each of these areas adequately supported nuclear safety.
The team also evaluated the stations processes for use of industry and NRC operating experience information and the effectiveness of the stations audits and self-assessments.
Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that your staffs performance in each of these areas adequately supported nuclear safety.
Finally, the team reviewed the stations programs to establish and maintain a safety-conscious work environment and interviewed station personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs. Based on the teams observations and the results of these interviews the team found no evidence of challenges to your organizations safety-conscious work environment. Your employees appeared willing to raise nuclear safety concerns through at least one of the several means available.
The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Geoffrey B. Miller, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 05000313 and 05000368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6
Enclosure:
As stated
Inspection Report
Docket Numbers:
05000313 and 05000368
License Numbers:
Report Numbers:
05000313/2019011 and 05000368/2019011
Enterprise Identifier: I-2019-011-0002
Licensee:
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Facility:
Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2
Location:
Russellville, Arkansas
Inspection Dates:
August 5, 2019, to August 22, 2019
Inspectors:
I. Anchondo-Lopez, Reactor Inspector
R. Azua, IPAT, Acting Team Leader
P. Jayroe, Reactor Inspector
T. Sullivan, Resident Inspector
Approved By:
Geoffrey B. Miller
Deputy Director
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring the licensees performance by conducting a biennial problem identification and resolution inspection at Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information.
List of Findings and Violations
No findings or violations of more than minor significance were identified.
Additional Tracking Items
None
INSPECTION SCOPES
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs)in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html.
Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE
71152B - Problem Identification and Resolution Biennial Team Inspection (IP Section 02.04)
The inspectors performed a biennial assessment of the licensees corrective action program, use of operating experience, self-assessments and audits, and safety-conscious work environment (SCWE).
- Corrective Action Program Effectiveness: The inspectors assessed the corrective action programs effectiveness in identifying, prioritizing, evaluating, and correcting problems.
- Operating Experience, Self-Assessments and Audits: The inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the stations processes for use of operating experience, audits and self-assessments.
- Safety-Conscious Work Environment: The inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the stations programs to establish and maintain a SCWE.
INSPECTION RESULTS
Assessment 71152B Effectiveness of Problem Identification: Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that the licensee's performance in this area adequately supported nuclear safety. Overall, the team found that the licensee was identifying and documenting problems at an appropriately low threshold that supported nuclear safety. On average, the licensee was identifying and documenting approximately 1360 Condition Reports (CRs) per month.
Effectiveness of Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues: Overall, the team found that the licensee was appropriately prioritizing and evaluating issues to support nuclear safety. Of the samples reviewed, the team found that the licensee correctly characterized each condition report as to whether it represented a condition adverse to quality, and then prioritized the evaluation and corrective actions in accordance with program guidance.
Effectiveness of Corrective Actions: Overall, the team concluded that the licensee's corrective actions supported nuclear safety. Specifically, Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, developed effective corrective actions for the problems evaluated in the corrective action program and generally implemented these corrective actions in a timely manner commensurate with their safety significance. However, the team did identify some CRs that were difficult to follow or where it was not clear that the corrective actions were addressed. Ultimately, it was determined that the corrective actions were all completed appropriately, but that the documentation could have been better. It was noted by the team that these examples were for CRs written in 2016 and 2017. More recent CRs appeared to be better written with a clear line of sight as to how the corrective actions were addressed.
Corrective Action Program Assessment: Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined the licensee's corrective action program complied with regulatory requirements and self-imposed standards, and the licensee's implementation of the corrective action program adequately supported nuclear safety. The team found that management's oversight of the corrective action program process was effective.
Observation: Operating Experience, Self-Assessments, and Audit Assessment 71152B Operating Experience: The team reviewed a variety of sources of operating experience including Part 21 notifications and other vendor correspondence, NRC generic communications, and publications from various industry groups including Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). The team determined that Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, is adequately screening and addressing issues identified through operational experience that apply to the station and that this information is evaluated in a timely manner once it is received.
Self-Assessments and Audit Assessment: The team reviewed a sample of the licensee's departmental self-assessments and audits to assess whether they regularly identified performance trends and effectively addressed them. The team also reviewed audit reports to assess the effectiveness of assessments in specific areas. Overall, the team concluded that the licensee had an adequate departmental self-assessment and audit process.
Observation: Safety-Conscious Work Environment Assessment (SCWE)71152B Safety-Conscious Work Environment: The team interviewed approximately forty individuals in eight group interviews. The purpose of these interviews was
- (1) to evaluate the willingness of your staff to raise nuclear safety issues, either by initiating a CR or by another method;
- (2) to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of the corrective action program at resolving identified problems; and
- (3) to evaluate your SCWE. The focus group participants included personnel from Security, Radiation Protection, Projects, and Instrumentation and Controls. Overall, Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, has an adequate SCWE.
Willingness to Raise Nuclear Safety Issues: In most focus groups, the team found no evidence of challenges to the SCWE. Individuals in these groups expressed a willingness to raise nuclear safety concerns and other issues through at least one of the several means available. However, the team found some work environment challenges in the Security Department. Through interviews with the staff members, the team identified a significant decline in morale that appears to permeate throughout the Security Department work environment. This degradation in morale appears to be caused by excessive overtime. The team brought this observation to senior plant managements attention, who were aware of many of the issues. While not currently affecting the SCWE, the team discussed with station management that continued degradation of staff morale could negatively impact staff performance. Specifically, distracted people are more likely to make mistakes.
Overall, the team concluded that all work groups at Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, maintained a healthy SCWE. However, morale issues in the Security Department may have a negative effect on staff performance and potentially on plant safety.
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
On August 22, 2019, the inspectors presented the biennial problem identification and resolution inspection results to Mr. B. Patrick and other members of the licensee staff.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Inspection
Procedure
Type
Designation
Description or Title
Revision or
Date
Corrective
Action
Documents
CR-ANO-X-
XXXX-XXXXX
1-2015-00631, 1-2015-01110, 1-2016-00673, 1-2016-03526,
1-2016-04473, 1-2016-04833, 1-2017-02109, 1-2017-02512,
1-2017-02518, 1-2017-03143, 1-2017-03472, 1-2017-03537,
1-2017-03673, 1-2018-00052, 1-2018-00053, 1-2018-00180,
1-2018-00181, 1-2018-00182, 1-2018-00530, 1-2018-00733,
1-2018-00851, 1-2018-00977, 1-2018-00999, 1-2018-01260,
1-2018-01348, 1-2018-01351, 1-2018-01408, 1-2018-01495,
1-2018-01610, 1-2018-01792, 1-2018-01959, 1-2018-02240,
1-2018-02282, 1-2018-02561, 1-2018-02821, 1-2018-02824,
1-2018-02845, 1-2018-03238, 1-2018-03540, 1-2018-03567,
1-2018-03614, 1-2018-03632, 1-2018-03729, 1-2018-03754,
1-2018-03930, 1-2018-04294, 1-2018-04314, 1-2018-04376,
1-2018-05007, 1-2018-05186, 1-2018-05187, 1-2018-05188,
1-2018-05206, 1-2018-05206, 1-2018-05244, 1-2018-05244(1),
1-2018-05311, 1-2018-05360, 1-2019-00141, 1-2019-00219,
1-2019-00290, 1-2019-00795, 1-2019-01017, 1-2019-01073,
1-2019-01073(1), 1-2019-01222, 1-2019-01224, 2-2002-02040,
2-2006-00318, 2-2008-01439, 2-2008-01763, 2-2010-00036,
2-2010-02793, 2-2010-02863, 2-2010-02865, 2-2012-02609,
2-2014-03154, 2-2015-00793, 2-2016-00789, 2-2016-00946,
2-2016-01071, 2-2016-04263, 2-2016-04277, 2-2017-03161,
2-2017-03337, 2-2017-05291, 2-2017-05330, 2-2017-05335,
2-2017-05335(1), 2-2017-05335(2), 2-2017-05335(3),
2-2017-06020, 2-2017-06114, 2-2018-00425, 2-2018-00867,
2-2018-00868, 2-2018-01418, 2-2018-02045, 2-2018-02545,
2-2018-03171, 2-2018-03412, 2-2018-03431, 2-2018-03442,
2-2018-03454, 2-2018-03454(1), 2-2018-03601, 2-2018-03750,
2-2018-04556, 2-2019-00430, 2-2019-00432, 2-2019-00780,
2-2019-00856, 2-2019-00863, 2-2019-00935, 2-2019-00936,
2-2019-00937, 2-2019-00938, 2-2019-00948, 2-2019-00949,
2-2019-00951, 2-2019-00952, 2-2019-00953, 2-2019-00954,
2-2019-00955, 2-2019-00956, 2-2019-00957, 2-2019-00958,
Inspection
Procedure
Type
Designation
Description or Title
Revision or
Date
2-2019-00959, 2-2019-01073, 2-2019-01263, C-2012-01591,
C-2015-03033, C-2016-00614, C-2017-00203, C-2017-03180,
C-2017-04123, C-2017-04125, C-2017-04482, C-2017-04495,
C-2017-04517, C-2017-04759, C-2018-00299, C-2018-00495,
C-2018-00717, C-2018-01121, C-2018-01465, C-2018-01484,
C-2018-01846, C-2018-01846(1), C-2018-01928,
C-2018-02045, C-2018-02053, C-2018-02902, C-2018-03034,
C-2018-03052, C-2018-03070(1), C-2018-03210,
C-2018-03443, C-2018-03597, C-2018-03735, C-2018-04246,
C-2018-04316, C-2018-04349, C-2018-04570, C-2018-04572,
C-2019-00535(1), C-2019-01406, C-2019-02144,
C-2019-02193, C-2019-02894
Drawings
Large Pipe Isometric Service Water Piping from Loop 1 Header
to Penetration Valve 2CV-1511-1
2HCC-313-1
Large Pipe Isometric Service Water Piping from 2VE-IB to
Large Pipe Isometric Service Water from Control Room
Emergency Chiller 2VE-1B to 2K-4B Heat Exchanger
CBV-A%-10-
0011
Check Valve Sch 40 Socket Weld Ends, ANSI Class 600
M-2210
Piping & Instrumentation Diagram Service Water System,
Unit 2
M-507
Instrument Line Class Specification
ULD-2-SYS-10
ANO Unit 2 Service Water System
Miscellaneous
6030.109
Installation of Electrical Cable & Wire
Procedures
1000.006
Procedure Control
1104.023
Diesel Oil Transfer Procedure
1601.505
Processing of Spent Radioactive Resin
1903.069
Equipment Important to Emergency Response
2104.029
Service Water System Operations
115
CEP-NDE-0965
Visual Welding Inspections ASME, ANSI B31.1
CEP-WP-003
Qualification and Control of Welders
CEP-WP-GWS-1
General Welding Standard ASME/ANSI
COPD-024
Risk Assessment Guidelines
Employee Concerns Program
10/11
EN-FAP-LI-001
Performance Improvement Review Group (PRG) Process
Corrective Action Program
Self-Assessment and Benchmark Process
13/14
Cause Evaluation Process
27/29
Trending and Performance Review Process
23/25
Operating Experience Program
28/32
Operability Determination Process
Conduct of Operations
Nuclear Excellence Model
Safety-Conscious Work Environment (SCWE) Policy
Maintaining a Strong Safety Culture
Audit Process
Licensed Operator Requalification Training Program
Work Implementation and Closeout
OP-1032.036
Service Water Piping Leak Evaluation and Monitoring
OP-1102.015
Filling and Draining the Fuel Transfer Canal
OP-1104.002
Makeup and Purification System Operation
OP-1106.016
Condensate, Feedwater, and Steam System Operations
OP-1203-025
Natural Emergencies
OP-1402.240
Inspection of Watertight Hatches
OP-1903.010
EAL Classification
56/57
OP-1903.069
Equipment Important to Safety
OP-2104.036
Emergency Diesel Generator Operations
Self-
Assessments
LO-ALO-2018-
00063
Self-Assessment - Radiation Safety Hazard Assessment,
Airborne Controls, and Performance Indicators
08/05/2019
QA-10-2018-
ANO-1
2018 QA Audit of Maintenance
07/13/2018
QA-14/15-2017-
ANO-01
2017 QA Audit of Combined Radiation Protection and
Radwaste
11/14/2017
QA-3-2019-ANO-
2019 QA Audit of Corrective Action Program at Arkansas
Nuclear One
06/19/2019
QA-8-2019-ANO-
2019 QA Audit of Engineering Programs
04/11/2019
Work Orders
WO-XXXXXX
150817, 260381, 261219, 379285, 379287, 457963, 462301,
461547-1, 503751, 506252, 521657-01, 521759
WR-XXXXXX
21140, 421141