IR 05000309/1988005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-309/88-05 on 880314-18 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup on Findings of Regulatory Effectiveness Review Conducted on 870608-12
ML20151N571
Person / Time
Site: Maine Yankee
Issue date: 04/11/1988
From: Bailey R, Keimig R, Lancaster W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151N543 List:
References
50-309-88-05, 50-309-88-5, NUDOCS 8804250329
Download: ML20151N571 (4)


Text

.

.

.

-

-

.1.:'t.x. : / :

=E -

J.s2.Wstn1tD.....

... -.

p.-;

2..M

.NMc: /2Z YL3 'N

, - Q"- :

i:mzi

.

,.

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report-No.

50-309/88-05

. Docket No.

50-309 License No.

ORP-36 Licensee:

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company 83 Edison Drive Aucusta, Maine 04336 Facility Name:

Maine Yankee Atomic Pcwer Station Inspection At: Wiscasset, Maine

' Inspection Conducted: March 14-18, 1988 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: June 8-12, 1987 Type of Inspection:

Routine. Unannounced Physical Security Inspectors:

M f

/ /'

R. J. B~aile9, Physical Se'curity Inspector

' da':e

~

lf YNf}'S W. K. Lancaster, Physical ~ Security inspector

/ daf.e f.

M - 88 M /*

//

Approved by:

.

.

R 4. R. Keimig,(Chief, ja eguards Section, date Division of Radi fi n Safety and Safeguards Inspection Summary:

Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on

.

March 14-18, 1938 (Inspection No. 50-309/88-05)

l Areas Inspec*ed:

Follow-up on the findings of the Regulatory Effectiveness e

Review conducted on June 8-12, 1987.

"

Results:

The licensee responded to the NRC regarding the RER findings by letter dated January 29, 1988.

Based upon that response and the inspection of actions taken to date, add':tional.information is required from the licensee.

The licensee committed to provide it by May 16, 1988.

l 8804250329 880413 PDR ADOCK 05000309 O

DCD

_

.-..,,.

,,

_ _ _ _ _ - -. - _ _.. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ - - -

_ _

.

, _..

.,:..- - - _ _

- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _

__._

_ _ _ -

.

. _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - ________ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

-s

-

.

.

.

.9 DETAILS 1.

Key Persons Contacted

-

a.

Licensee Personnel P. S. Lyon, Vice President, Finance and Administration J. Brinkler, Assistant Plant Manager R. Blacknan, Manager Operations Department S. F. Castonguay, Manager, Acministration

.

S. Evans, Licensing Engineer L. Olsterling, Assistant Licensing Engineer H. Torberg, Security Supervisor b.

U.S. Nuclear Reculatory Commission Personnel C. Holden, Senior Resident Inspector

,

The inspectors also interviewed other licensee and contractor security personnel.

2.

Follow-uo on Regulatory Effectiveness Review Findings On Novemoer -2-6,1957, the NRC conducted a Regulatory Effectiveness Review (RER) at the MaineLYankee Atomic Power Station.

The report of the RER findings was transmitted to the licensee on December 9, 1937.

On January 29, 1953, the licensee responded to the RER findings outlining those actions already taken, and those actions to be taken, as aporopriate.

During this inspection, the inspectors reviewed the licensee's response and those actions taken to cate, and cetermined that the licensee's did not address, in all cases, the full extent of the RER Team's findings.

This was discussed with representatives of the licensee during this inspection and they acknowledged that their response required further information.

They cd,.mitted to supplement the January 29 response by May 16, 19S8.

.

The results of the inspectors' review of the licensee's action taken to date a e contained in Paragraph 3 of this report.

3.

Review of Licensee Actions on RER Findings The following are the results of the inspectors' review of the licensee's actions, to date, on the findings of the RER Tear-B p -9er -;"...

....s..,.c.

q...

r

,,',

.

7,.;',... J/,,,,,;3,, "

J,* r. c

-

4.. r

"

...

.,,f-..

..

.8

..,

...t:

.

.,,,,,

r +

-9 & - - - - + - - - - - - - - -

s-v--

., - - + - -

-w---

-,, * * - > < -, - -, - = - * -

+

v,-,,

,

T e +


,w<-ve-.--*----

---.----,-~w--

-<=

-+---v

a

-.

1

'

-

.

.

(

e

.

.g

,

i

?,n '. f. (% * (,". M ',' / } {) (J

, 8 *g*

T ', !,* {,,* * O8

  • ., e + dj i l...

.e

.

t.

e*'

.i tt

,

',-s.

,

.,

t?

-s

,,

<e sa

.

's

's

.g.s

-

t

,

,

6,1

I.

t.,

",,.

(,

,

'f '

>*#

-

.

6; e

,.

..

t.

.

.

...

,

.

I

!

,...

,.,... -

-

. -.. - - -,... -,.., -..

,.

,,., -. -,, -

, - -...,..,,

.

.

.

e

-

I * ' '.* C.'.5 8 k '- o.s e,* n 9.,.

i.

' -*

.',%

9..,~.

.

,

,

..,

,. :,' !> U7 in

.s.., ;

sas

.:u -.vi.n p :,..

ir-

..

..

,,

-

.

..,...i

,.,

.,,,

c

.,,,

f.

Other RER Findinos

-

ine following RER findirgs require further review and action by -he licensee:

2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.4, 2.2.5, 2.2.7, 2.3.2, 2.3.3, 2.3.6, 2.3.7 and 2.4.1.

Those will be reviewed during a subsecuent NR^

inspection, e

6