IR 05000302/1986029

Insp Rept 50-302/86-29 on 860825-29.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection/ Prevention & Followup on Previously Identified Insp Items

ML20215E836
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	09/22/1986
From:	Conlon T, Wiseman G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20215E822	List: IR 05000302/1986029 ML20215E817
References
50-302-86-29, NUDOCS 8610150522
Download: ML20215E836 (10)

Text

.- .

UNITE 3 STATES

/pmRCgb o,^ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N

& REGION il h 101 MARIETTA STREET. *- I ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323

\,*...*/

Report No.: 50-302/86-29 Licensee: Florida Power Corporation 3201 34th Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Docket No.: 50-302 License No.: DPR-72 Facility Name: Crystal River 3 Inspection Conducted: August 25-29, 1986 Inspector: I.*

G. R. Wiseman U'"a 9[/7[Ilo Date Signed Approved //N/ V 8 - 2 2. -8d.-

t T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed l Plant Systems Section, Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY

'

Scope: This routine, announced inspection was conducted in the areas of fire protection / prevention and followup on previously identified inspection item Results: No violations or deviations were identified.

l

,

!

!

!

l

.

l 0610130322 061003 2 PDR ADOCK 0D00(

[

-

G

. . - , . - . . . . .. . - _ , . - - . . . - . . .- - -_ .. _

.-.

. .

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees R. A. Arnold, Nuclear Team Instructor

• W. K. Bandlaver, Assistant Nuclear Operations Manager

• C. G. Brown, Manager of Outages

• J. L. Buckner, Nuclear Security Superintendent

• A. E. Friend, Nuclear Staff Engineer

• A. H. Geiston, Nuclear Electrical /I&C Engineering Supervisor

• L. A. Hill, Manager Site Nuclear Services

• J. Londer, Director, Nuclear Projects and Outages

• M. S. Mann, Nuclear Compliance Specialist P. F. McKee, Director, Nuclear Plant Operations

• R. L. McLaughlin, Nuclear Outage and Modifications E. A. McLeod, Nuclear Assistant Shift Supervisor / Fire Team Leader

• L. Rossfeld, Manager, Nuclear Compliance

• J. L. Russell, Senior Fire Protection Specialist

• E. Williams, Fire Protection Specialist

• K. R. Wilson, Manager, Site Nuclear Licensing Oth'er Organization ,

• H. S. Howard, Howard and Associates NRC Resident Inspector

• J. E. Tedrow

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on August 29,,1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection finding No dissenting comments were received from the license The following new itcms were identified during this inspection, IFI (302/86-29-01), Review of Licensee's Corrective Actions for Poor l Housekeeping in Radwaste Decontamination Areas Identified by SP-809 -

paragraph IFI (302/86-29-02), Possible Degradation of TSI Fire Barrier Enclosures paragraph ;

t L

_ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ - - . - - .

.. .

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (Closed) Unresolved Item (302/85-30-03), Completion of Dedicated HVAC System for Control Complex: On September 11, 1985, the NRC issued a safety evaluation report which approved the design concept of the control complex dedicated HVAC system for use in safe plant shutdown during a fire event.

,

The inspector's review of MAR 82-10-19-09 indicated that the installation

!

and test of the control complex dedicated HVAC system was completed on April 1, 198 Functional testing for the dedicated HVAC system was conducted under M0P-502 test procedure for MAR 82-10-19-09. Functional testing was completed on March 28,1986, and the unit placed in operation. The inspector reviewed Operating Procedure OP-409 (Rev.16) and verified that the dedicated HVAC unit was included within the procedure for periodic surveillance. Based on this review, this item is close . Unresolved items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspectio . Fire Protection Prevention Program (64704) Fire Prevention / Administrative Control Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Prevention / Administrative Procedures:

Procedure N Title

-

CR-3 Fire Protection Plan (Rev. 2)

AI-1000 Good Housekeeping (Rev. 19)

AI-2200 Guidelines for Handling, Use, and Control of Transient Combustibles (Rev. 1)

, AI-2205 Administration of CR3 Fire Brigade Organization (Rev. 2)

EM-201 Duties of an Individual who Discovers an Emergency (Rev. 4)

EM-206 Emergency Plan Roster and Notification (Rev. 33)

EM-216 Duties of the Nuclear Plant Fire Brigade (Rev. 14)

.

_ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

TOP-307 Nuclear Emergency Team Training Program (Rev. 6)

Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC Guidelines of BTP APCSB 9.5-1, Appendix Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Protection System Surveil-lance Procedures:

Procedure N Title SP-190A Functional and Operability Test of the Auxiliary Building Fire Detection Instrumentation (Rev. 0)

l SP-364 Outside Fire Equipment, Hose Station and Fire Cart Inventory (Rev. 22)

SP-3658 Fire Pump Operability and Recirculation, and Diesel Fuel Sampling: Fire Suppression Water System - Valve Position Check (Rev. 25)

SP-809 Fire Protection Weekly Inspection (Rev. 2)

SP-810 TSI Fire Barrier Check (Rev. 0)

The above surveillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the various test outlines and inspection instructions adequately implement the surveillance requirements of the plant's Fire Protection Technical Specification In addition, these procedures were reviewed to determine if the inspection and test instructions followed general industry fire protection practices, NRC fire protection program guidelines and the gu.delines of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Codes. Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures are satisfactory, Fire Protection System Surveillance Inspections and Tests The inspector reviewed the following surveillance inspection and test records for the dates indicated:

(1) Functional and Operability Test of the Auxiliary Building Fire Detection Instrumentation - SP-190A Semiannual tests conducted on August 6,1985 and March 12, 1986

.

. .

(2) Outside Fire Equipment Hose Station and Fire _ Cart Inventory -

SP-364 Monthly Hose House Inventory conducted between June 28, 1986 and August 23, 198 Fire Reel Hose Stations Hose and Nozzle monthly checks conducted between June 28, 1986 and August 23, 198 (3) Fire Pump Operability - SP-365B Weekly Fire pump run tests conducted between May 1,1986 and August 14, 1986 (4) Fire Protection Weekly Inspection - Sp-809 Weekly inspections conducted between June 20, 1986 and August 2, 1986 (5) TSI Fire Barrier check - SP-810 This surveillance has not yet been conducte This inspection is to be conducted on an 18 month frequency in accordance with TS 8.7.12 based upon refueling outages. 1his surveillance will be performed during the next scheduled refuel outag Test records will be reviewed during a subsequent NRC inspectio The surveillance test record data and testing frequency associated with the above fire protection system surveillance tests / inspections were found to be satisfactory with regard to meeting the reqbirements of the plant's Fire Protection Technical Specifications, d. Fire Protection Audits The most recent audit report of the fire protection program was reviewed. This audit included:

Annual Fire Protection Audit - Audit Report QP-276 for audits for the period of September 23, 1985 to October 16, 198 This audit identified several fire protection program discrepancies, and recommended several program improvements. The licensee has either implemented the corrective actions associated with the audit findings or a scheduled date for complution of the correction actions had been establishe The licensee appears to be taking' the appropriate corrective actions on the audit finding .

. .

e. Fire Brigade (1) Organization The fire brigade is composed of approximately 89 personnel from the plant staff. The on-duty fire brigade team consists of a fire team leader and four brigade members. The fire team leader is normally the Nuclear Assistant Shif t Supervisor and the remaining fire brigade members are composed of Operations and Building Services personnel. The inspector reviewed the " Control Center Log" for the period July 2, 1986 through August 27, 1986, and verified that sufficient qualified fire brigade personnel were assigned to each on-duty shift to meet the provisions of Technical Specification 6. (2) Training Procedure TDP-307 outlines the fire brigade training progra Each fire brigade member receives fire brigade initial training which is designed to provide basic knowledge and manual fire fighting skill The initial fire brigade training program is approximately 44 hours5.092593e-4 days <br />0.0122 hours <br />7.275132e-5 weeks <br />1.6742e-5 months <br /> in duration and includes 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of classroom training,16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> of hands-on training at the Florida State Fire College and a four hour plant familiarization sessio A requalification program consisting of quarterly training sections is repeated over a two year period to assure that each member's training is maintained up-to-dat A review of the training records for two fire brigade team leaders and five brigade members verified that these employees had received the fire brigade initial training and drills for 1985 and two quarters of 1986. The review indicated that the two on-duty fire brigade team leaders identified above had received fire brigade leadership training, however, not all personnel who potentially could be designated as a fire brigade team leader have received brigade leadership training. The licensee stated that these individuals are scheduled to complete this training prior to January 1,198 This will be reviewed during a future NRC inspectio (3) Fire Brigade Equipment The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equipment consisting of turnout gear (coats, boots, gloves, helmets, etc.) and the self contained breathing apparatus (SCBAs)

stored at the fire brigade response location on 95' elevation of the turbine buildin Additional turnout gear and fire fighting equipment such as fire hose and nozzles, lanterns, extra air bottles, and portable exhaust fans are stored on two fire carts located in the auxiliary building (Elevation 119') and turbine building (Elevation 145').

. .

Based on this inspection, the designated inventory of fire brigade equipment stored at the fire brigade response locations and on fire carts appeared to be properly maintained and stored in a

• ready conditio (4) Fire Brigade Firefighting Pre-Fire Plans The inspector reviewed the following pre-fire plans to determine if the plans developed proper firefighting strategies and addressed the NRC guidelines established in Appendix A to BTP APCSB 9.5-1, Rev. Pre-Fire Plan N Plant Area AB-95-12 RWSW Pump Room AB-119-11 Emergency Diesel Generator 3A Room CC-124-1 Control Rod Drive Relay Room CC-134-1 Cable Spreading Room Based on this review, the fire brigade pre-fire plans appeared satisfactor (5) Fire Brigade Drill During this inspection, the inspector witnessed an unannounced firo brigade drill conducted on the evening on-duty shift. The driil scenario was a fire in the Control Rod Drive and Communication Equipment Room (Fire Area CC-124-111) on elevation 124' of the control complex. The apparent drill fire condition was caused by a fire within the Electro Hydraulic Control (E.H.C.) cabine Nine fire brigade members responded to the pending fire emergenc Five brigade members assembled outside the equipment room in full protective firefighting turnout clothing and self contained breathing apparatus. An initial size-up of the fire condition was made by the Fire Team Leader who communicated to the control room to deenergize the E.H.C. cabinet and room ventilation system Based on this sizeup, the brigade team established one lh-inch water fire attack hose line and a 1 inch exposure hose line and advanced into the plant area experiencing the fire condition. The initial fire attack utilized a multipurpose portable fire extinguisher with final fire extinguishment with hose lines and fog stream The fire attack and exposure lines were placed in service at the fire location in approximately 11 minute The fire brigade utilized adequate manual firefighting methods and reacted to the fire drill scenario in an effective and efficient manne e O 7 Plant Tour A tour of the plant was made by the inspector to review the licensee's implementation of the fire protection program. In general, the housekeeping was considered satisfactory except for several radwaste decontamination areas located on elevation 143' of the auxiliary building and on elevation 160' of the operating floor. Within these areas, some combustible materials (wiping rags and cloth, untreated plywood, and solvents) were identified as not properly stored after completion of the day shift activities. These conditions were reported by the Site Fire Protection Specialist during his weekly housekeeping walkthrough (Surveillance Procedure, SP-809) and is identified as Inspector Followup Item (302/86-29-01), Review of Licensee's Corrective Action for Poor Housekeeping in Radwaste Decontamination Areas Identified by SP-80 The sprinkler systems for elevations 95' and 119' of the intermediate and auxiliary buildings were inspected and found to be in servic The fire alarm system control panels (Nos. 3 and 5) were reviewed and four.d to be in servic An inspection was made of the TSI fire barrier wraps for safe-shutdown related raceways in the following areas to verify their completeness and condition:

Location Raceway Fire Area CC-124-111 120 623 Fire Area CC-124-116 EFE95 MSS 46 Fire Zone AB-119-7A 562 Fire Zone IB-95-200C EFE96 302 The fire barrier enclosures inspected above appeared to be complete, and continuous through the fire area or zon The installations included fire proofing of the load-bearing structural steel members which support the raceway fire barrier enclosures. The inspector noted, however, that some of the TSI barrier material within fire area CC-124-116 and fire zone IB-95-200c appeared to be leaking moisture and in some areas, was flaking from the surface of the assembly. The licensee stated that this condition had been previously identified and that the vendor (TSI Inc.) had been requested to come to the site to review the cause of the condition.

. .

_

. .

The licensee stated that TSI had indicated that this condition did not degrade the fire resistive properties of the barrier enclosure, but that the condition needed further revie Based on this information, this is identified as Inspector Followup Item (302/86-29-02), Possible Degradation of TSI Fire Barrier Enclosures, and will be reviewed during a subsequent NRC inspectio . Inspector Followup Items (IFI) (Closed) IFI (302/81-25-01), Implementation of an Administrative Procedure for the Fire Fighting Strategies: The inspector reviewed CR3 Fire Protection Plan, Revision 2, Section 3.2.8.1 which addresses implementation of the Pre-fire Plans for CR3. Administration of the Pre-Fire Plans is directed by the Site Nuclear Services Procedure Manual, AMI-06 which appears sufficient to assure proper control of the plans. On the basis of this review, this item is considered close (Closed) IFI (302/85-14-01), Inadequate Fire Protection Program Implementation Procedures: The inspector reviewed those procedures identified in paragraphs 5.a. and 5.b. of this report to verify that plant implementing procedures were issued for fire protection / preven-tion features as housekeeping, control of combustibles and ignition sources and transient fire loads. Verification of the implementation of these procedures is accomplished through use of a plant audit program conducted by the plant supervisors and the Site Fire Protection Staff. Based upon these reviews, these procedures appear to provide satisfactory implementation of the requirements of the Fire Protection Pla (Closed) IFI (302/85-14-02), Surveillance Procedure Revision Required to Verify No-Flow Blockage to Fire Hose Stations: Procedure SP-802, Rev.12, Annual Fire Hose Hydro Test and Hose Reel Inspection was revised on May 8, 1985, to include step 6.4.6.5. This provides a test of unobstructed flow through the hose station valve at one-fourth turn open. This testing appears acceptabl (Closed) IFI (302/85-14-03), Revise Fire Pump Test Procedure to Include Acceptance Criteria for 150% Capacity Flow Tests: Procedure SP-363, Revision 23, Fire Protection Systems Tests, provides for fire pump flow testing at three points; O gpm, 2000 gpm, and 3000 gpm, which represents testing to 150% of the pump capacity. This test is acceptable to comply to the requirements of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 20, Section 11- (Closed) IFI (302/85-14-04), Inadequate Independent Verification Provided for Fire Protection System Components: Procedure SP-366, Rev.17, Fire System Annual Valve Surveillance, dated June 25, 1986, has been issued to require independert verification and signoff for the conduct of valve positioning and required restoration position. Based on the revision of this procedure, this item is close . o

f. (Closed) IFI (302/85-14-05), Revision of Procedure SP-407 to Identify All Fire Barrier Penetration Seals: Procedure SP-407, Rev.13, dated July 8,1986,'has been issued to require surveillance of all designated fire barrier penetration seals separating safety-related fire areas or redundant systems on a 18 month frequenc This appears adequat g. (0 pen) IFI (302/85-14-06), Revision of Fire Hazards Analysis: The revised Fire Hazards Analysis was issued on October 18,1985, to FPC

, for site use. This document, however, has not yet been submitted to the NRC/NRR for revie This item remains ope h. (Closed) IFI (302/85-30-01), Verification of Cable Raceway Fire Barrier Installation: The inspector reviewed work request 63560 of the Modification Approval Records (MAR) package MAR 82-10-19-04 which indicated that installation of TSI Fire Protection barrier wraps on elevations 95' and 119' of the Auxiliary Building were completed on January 31, 1986. The inspector verified during walkdowns of selected plant areas that this work was indeed completed. Based on this review and walkthrough, this item is close . (Closed) IFI (302/85-30-04), Review of Licensees Completed Fire Door Modifications as Denoted by MAR No. 85-02-10-01: The inspector reviewed the completed MAR 85-02-10-01 package and work request 6398 These documents indicated that the fire door modifications were completed on December 2,1985. The inspector visually inspected fire doors C-213, C-304, and C-305, and verified that the subject penetra-tions in the transom panels had been sealed, therefore, this item is close J. (Closed) IFI (302/85-30-05), Verification of Unobstructed Sprinkler System Spray Patterns: During the July 29, 1985 NRC Fire Protection Audit, the inspectors were unable to evaluate if serious obstructions existed between the sprinklers and the floor (which might affect proper water distribution) because large amounts of construction equipment was in the area during the outage. During this walkthrough inspection, several sprinkler systems within the control complex, intermediate building, and auxiliary building, Elevation 95',119' and 124' were reviewed for sprinkler obstructio No major obstructions were identified where only ceiling level sprinklers were installed. It appeared that where many obstructions did exist the licensee had installed an intermediate level sprinkler system located below such obstructions. Based on the review and walkdown of these systems, this item is considered close . - - .