IR 05000298/1988020
| ML20196E382 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 12/02/1988 |
| From: | Callan L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Trevors G NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8812090328 | |
| Download: ML20196E382 (2) | |
Text
(' :. '..
,
at a
In Reply Refer. To:.
Docket:
50-298/88-20 Nebraska Public Power District
.
!
ATTN: Geor9e A. Trevors Division Manager - Nuclear Support i
P.O. Box 499 r
Colunbus, NE 68602-0499 j
Gentlemen:
I
.
'
Thank you for your letter of November 21, 1988, in response to our letter and Notice of Violation dated October 21, 1988. We have reviewed your reply
,
,
and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violation. We I
will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future j
inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be
maintained.
f i
Sincerely, C?ig;31kWSSE;
p.,e,13'!ACH
!
L. J. Callan, Director Division of Reactor Projects
!
CC:
Cooper Nuclear Station
!
i ATTN: Guy Horn, Division Manager of Nuclear Operations l
P.O. Box 98
,
Brownville, Nebraska 68321 l
,
Kansas Radiation Control Program Director i
Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director bec to DMB (IE-01)
f
!
L t
D' Dff I
RIV:PSfdh C:PSC Lka41an 1\\ \\!
GLMadse;df GLCon tab e 12/p88 12/t488 12/g /88
/y
.
_ _ _000298 FDR ADOCK 05 j
a PDC.
,
, - -
_-.
~
".
Nebraska Public Power District-2-
bec distrib, by RIV:
RRI R. D. Martin, RA SectionChief(DRP/C)
Lisa Shea, RM/ALF RPB-DRSS MIS System s
RIV File Project Engineer, DRP/C RSTS Operator DRP P. O'Connor, NRR Project Manager (MS:
13-D-18)
DRS P
L l
,
i
_
. _ _.
_ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _,
- e
.'%
,
.
.
x GFNERAL OmCE
+
Nebraska Public Power District
- ""d#EnM'f0'M*"*"
"
- @.. Il W..c.r-- 1 M
M..
-/l'~ @}
CfiSS883222
..D
..
E23e f
!
tiovember 21, 1988
,
U 1.;
e I
U.S. fluclear Regulatory Commission
_..
Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:
Subject: fiPPD Response to inspection Report 50-298/88 28 This letter is written in response to your letter dated October 21, 1988, transmitting inspection Report 50-298/88-28.
Therein you indicated that certain of our activities were in violation of tiRC requirements.
Following is a statement of the violation and our response in accordance with 10CFR2.201.
Statement of Violation Failure to Document Actions per Procedure 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, and the licensee's approved Quality Assurance Plan, require that activities shall be accompitshed in accor-dance with approved instructions, procedures, and drawings. fluclear Performance Procedure 10.27, "Cask IF-300 llandling and Shipping,"
Revision ll, dated August 11, 1988, requires sign offs in steps G.6, J.2, and J 5, of the procedure.
Contrary to the above, on September 20, 1988, steps G 6, J.2, and J.5 of tiuclear Performance Procedure 10.27 were not signed off even though those steps had been completed on September 19, 1988.
This is a Severity t.evel V violation.
(Supplement I) (298/8828 01)
Reason for the Violation This violation occurred as the result of a procedural inadequacy in that fluclear Performance Procedure 10.27 did not clearly specify that the l
deficient steps required signatures prior to proceeding with subsequent steps in the procedure.
It should be noted that the actions directed by steps G.6, J.2 and J.5 were actually performed, however, the steps were not signed at the time of performance. A verbal concurrence did exist between the responsible individuals prior to proceeding beyond these steps.
I m i ' h~ ng, ' -
'
C-M
&
-
,
=: i x m.v. w m n t:v m m a u m e : -
=
. :
- q
-
.
.-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- g h
'
.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 flovember 21, 1988 Corrective Steps Which llave Been Taken and The Results Achieved Signatures were obtained for steps G.2, J.2 and J.5 in the subject Nuclear Performance Procedure 10.27 "Cask IF 3000 llandling and Shipping".
This occurrence and the required corrective action have been discussed with Haintenance Department personnel who are qualified as floor supervisors for Cooper Nuclear Station spent fuel shipping activities.
Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid _Further Violation Nuclear Performance Procedure 10.27 is bei i revised to clearly delineate that the deficient steps require sign offs rior to proceeding to the next step. Additionally, the sequence of tome steps within the procedure will be changed for clarification and case of understanding.
Date When full Comp _llance Will Be Achieved Cooper Nuclear Station is currently in full compliance.
The revision to Nuclear Performance Procedure 10.27 will be achieved by December 15, 1988.
If you have any questions regarding this response, please contact me or G. R. Ilorn at the site.
Sincerely, (-
/ ifr(/;o*t&
A ev rs
.
Division Manager Nuclear Support GAT:GRil:Ju V
cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV Arlington,TX NRC Resident inspector l
Cooper Nuclear Station
- -
-
-.