IR 05000298/1986031
| ML20215D788 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1986 |
| From: | Bennett W, Jaudon J, Skow M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215D779 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-298-86-31, NUDOCS 8612170037 | |
| Download: ML20215D788 (6) | |
Text
t
'
'
.
.
,..
APPENDIX
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
+
NRC Inspection' Report:
50-298/86-31 License: DPR-46 Docket: 50-298 Licensee ~: Nebraska Public Power District P. O. Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68601 Facility Name: CooperNuclearStation(CNS).
Inspection At: Cooper Nuclear Station, Brownville, Nebraska Inspection Conducted: November 17-21, 1986 Inspectors:
M
[
'lA/J /P4 W. R. Bennett, Project Engineer, Project Date Section A, Reactor Projects Branch
/Zl.3lfd M. E. Skow, Project Engineer, Project Date '
Section A Reactor Pr ects Branch Approved:
/u/ M
/2 3 [
P/ Jau on, Chikf, Project Section A Datp '
actor ojects Branch Inspection Summary
,
Inspection Conducted November 17-21, 1986 (Report 50-298/86-31)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of quality assurance annual review, audit program, audit implementation, and procurement.
Results: Within the four areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8612170037 861205 PDR ADOCK 0500029B
'
G PDR
,
-
,
I
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
,
?
i
- G. R. Horn, Division Manager of Nuclear Operations R. Brungardt, Operations Manager
&
i R. L. Beilke, Chemistry and Health Physics Supervisor
- G. E. Smith, Acting Quality Assurance (QA) Manager
-
- J. R. Flaherty, Plant Engineering Supervisor
-
D. R. Robinson, QA Specialist
'
"
D. Overbeck, Purchasing / Materials and Accounting Supervisor R. Gibson, QA Specialist E. R. Behrends, QC Inspector R. Minadeo, Acting Equipment Qualification Coordinator, PATEL i
- J. M. Meacham, Senior Manager - Technical Support
- C. R. Goings, Regulatory Compliance Specialist
.
- C.
R. Moeller, Technical Staff Supervisor I
- V. L. Wolstenholm, Division Manager, QA
!
- S. S. Freborg, Lead Mechanical Engineer i
- Denotes those persons present at the exit meeting.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
!
(Closed) Violation 298/8530-01:
Failure to Follow Procedure. This violation concerned failure to issue findings for discrepancies noted
during surveillances. The licensee reviewed previous surveillances for the checklist 800-3 that was noted in the violation for the previous
,
t 6 months. Any case where a discrepancy was noted and a finding was not i
issued was listed for reinspection. For all items listed, all were found g
by the licensee to have been corrected during this subsequent
reinspection. The licensee stated that any items noted during the fire gg g protection surveillance will be cited as a finding.
In addition, the (.R.
licensee stated that housekeeping items will be dispositioned in
.
( @'.
l accordance with procedure 0.11 which is a managers and supervisors s.
.
-
inspection of the plant and not performed by working level QA personnel.
y:.
-
This item is closed.
F
[;y'.{
3.
Quality Assurance Annual Review I
The purpose of this portion of the inspection was to ascertain whether
,
ti revisions to QA implementing procedures are in conformance with the latest I
approved docketed QA Program, and that the licensee is implementing a QA E
program that is in conformance with regulatory requirements, commitments, and industry guides and standards.
,
cL
V
_ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _______-_- __ _ - __ _-
__ __
_ _
__
._
u y
'
,
,
-
.
The NRC Inspectors reviewed the'following QA procedures:
~
Number Rev Date Title
~
.QAI-1 L8 10/05/83 Guidelines for Preparation and Issuance of Quality Assurance Documents QAI-2
04/07/86 Controlled Distribution of Quality Assurance
'
Documents
~
f
- QAI-3
06/07/84 Definition'of Terms
.QAI-4
04/10/86 General Guidelines - Quality Assurance Surveillance QAI-5
07/22/86 General Guidelines - Quality Assurance Audits
- QAI-6
09/15/83 Personnel Qualifications and Training for QA Assignments QAI-7-
~15 -04/15/85 Quality Records Retention, Storage, and Distribution-QAI-8 6.~11/24/80 Applicability of NRC Quality Assurance Criteria QAI-9 8-05/04/82 Guidelines for Establishing Quality-Classifications of Components and Materials QAI-11
11/21/83 Delegation of Specific Responsibilities QAI-12-
07/22/86 Guidelines for Audit Frequency and
~
Scheduling-QAI-16
04/07/86 Supplier Approval
,
QAP-200
02/18/85 Station Operation
- QAP-600
_02/12/85 Surveillance Testing QAP-1400 12 06/20/86 Procurement and Control of Essential Spare Parts, Materials, and Equipment QAP-2200
03/06/85 SRAB and 50RC Activities Based on the review of the above procedures, the NRC inspectors found that recent changes to the QA program did not appear to have an adverse effect on quality or safety, and that the procedures did appear to be in conformance with the approved QA program.
.
-.... _....
.
.._
_
_
_
.
.
s
,
Interviews were conducted with various licensee personnel having i
responsibility for preparing implementing procedure changes to the QA program for operation. The personnel appeared to understand the significance of the specific changes.
Manning in the Quality Assurance division on site appeared less than would normally be expected for the work load assigned. The QA division has increased in size in recent years and three new positions have very recently been approved to further augment the QA presence on site.
In addition, the specific areas of Audit Program, Audit Implementation, and Procurement Control Program were reviewed and are discussed in the following paragraphs.
No violations or deviations were identified in this portion of the inspection.
4.
Audit Program and Implementation The purpose of this portion of the inspections was to ascertain whether the licensee has developed a quality assurance (QA) program relating to audits of activities that is in conformance with regulatory requirements and Technical Specifications.
It also was to ascertain whether the licensee is having qualified personnel conduct routine audits, ensuring that activities are in conformance with regulatory requirements, licensee commitments, and industry guides and standards.
In this regard, the NRC inspector reviewed the following documents:
Number Rev Date Title QAI-5
07/22/86 General Guidelines - Quality Assurance Audits QAI-12
07/22/86 Guidelines for Audit Frequency and Scheduling QAP-2200
03/06/85 SRAB and SORC Activities
Qaality Assurance Program for Operation Policy Document 1985 Audit Schedule 1986 Audit Schedule AUDITS:
86-15 09/09/86 QAP-200, Station Operations; Audit 86-15
,
85-21 01/13/86 QAP-1100, Preventive Maintenance Audit 85-21 85-24 03/11/86 QAP-1400, Procurement Audit 85-24
_
,
me s
,
.
During review of the schedules and procedures, the NRC inspectors found that the scope of the audit program had been defined and appeared consistent with the Technical Specification (TS) requirements.
It also appeared that responsibilities for the audit program were assigned in writirg, and that the audited organization was required to respond in writing to audit findings.
The procedures also included distribution requirements for the audit reports and corrective action responses.
h ing review of the audit packages, the NRC inspectors found that the
- coce of the audit and results were clearly defined, the audited crganization's response to findings appeared timely and adequate, and
'
appropriate followup actions appeared timely and adequate. The audits appeared to be conducted by trained personnel not having direct
-
responsibility in the area being audited.
The qualifications and records of four lead auditors were reviewed.
Documentation appeared adequate to support education, experience and E
qualification requirements.
g The licensee is required by procedure to perform all TS required audits each calendar year even where the TS requirement may be less frequent.
Because of the 1985 pipe replacement outage, several audits were rescheduled far December 1985.
In that period, it appeared that as many as seven audits were active at one time. Two of the audits selected for review by the NRC inspector were from this period.
It appeared that in spite of the heavy work load, that the audits were thorough and complete. The 1986 schedule showed only three audits scheduled to start in December. The QA specialist who will prepare the 1987 schedule plans to schedule no audits to start in December to allow for schedule slippage.
No violations or deviations were identified in this portion of the inspection.
5.
Procurement The purpose of this portion of the inspection was to ascertain whether the licensee is implementing a QA program to control procurement activities
.
that is in conformance with regulatory requirements, licensee commitments,
$1 and industry guides and standards.
In this regard, the NRC inspectors
['
reviewed the following documents:
&;
Arb1 Number Rev Date Title QAP-1400 12 06/20/86 Procurement and Control of Essential Spare Parts, Materials, and Equipment QAI-16
04/02/86 Supplier Approval 1.4
10/30/86 Requisitioning 1.11
05/22/86 Equipment Spare Parts Inventory (ESPI)
Program
__
- - - -.
g
_
..
.,
,..
e.
- - -
-
-
-
.
,
"
..
,
y Audit-
'-
85-24 03/11/86 QAP-1400, Procurement Audit 85-24 In addition, the NRC inspectors reviewed approximately 30 purchase
. orders.
'
The NRC inspectors determined that the procurement program was 'in conformance with regulatory requirements and industry standards interviews with QA, warehouse, and. engineering personnel demonstrated a knowledge of applicable procedures and programs. All purchase. orders reviewed were
' prepared in accordance with the appropriate procedures and properly reviewed for compliance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix B and Part 21 requirements.. All materials were purchased from qualified vendors as
. documented..in'an-approved vendors list which is updated monthly.
'
.No viol'ations or de' iations were; identified in this portion of the v
inspection.
.
b 6.
' Exit Meeting
~
The' NRC' inspectors conducted.and. exit meeting on November _21,1986, with
~
'
the licensee ' personnel denoted in paragraph 1.
Mr. D. Garrison, U.S. NRC Region-IV Inspector, also attended the meeting. At this meeting, the scope and findings of the, inspection were summarized.
..
Y
- - -
-.
.
.
..
- - -, _ _. - -