IR 05000293/1987028
| ML20235M453 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1987 |
| From: | Wiggins J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235M437 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-293-87-28-MM, NUDOCS 8707170202 | |
| Download: ML20235M453 (24) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:-- .. .. l U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Meeting No.: 50-293/87-28 Docket No.: 50-293 j i License No.: DPR-35 Licensee: Boston Edison Company M/C Nuclear
800 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts Facility Name: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Meeting Location: NRC, Regicn I i Meeting Conducted: June 29, 1987 Prepared By: J. Lyash, Resident Inspector Reviewed By: M. McBride, Senior Resident Inspector Approved By: [ // c.
- 7/[[[ J.
ggitr's, Chig, }rojects Section 18, DRP Da t'e Meeting Summary: A licensee /NRC management meeting was held at the NRC Region I office on June 29, 1987 to discuss the status of the outage, licensee program improvements, and other restart activities.
Licensee, NRC: Region I, and NRC:NRR management representatives were in attendance.
Six items requiring ongoing interaction between the NRC and licensee staffs were identified for followup.
8707170202 870708 PDR ADOCK 05000293 Q PDR _ _ _ _ _
.. . DETAILS 1.0 Purpose The management conference was held at the request of NRC: Region I.
The licensee was asked to discuss outage status, program improvements and preparations for. plant restart.
The purpose of the conference was to identify pertinent restart. issues and to review the licensee approach to restart assessment.
2.0. Meeting Summary The meeting was opened with brief-comments by NRC: Region I Administrator, W.
Russell.
Coston Edison (BECo) Senior Vice President-Nuclear, R.
G.
l Bird, began the licensee presentation with a description of past and pre-sent licensee problems and the steps taken to address these areas. This included a discussion of recent management changes and staffing increases.
Mr. Bird also presented a summary of the process to be used by BECo to
evaluate readiness for plant restart, and a proposed schedule for submiss- ! ion of a restart readiness report.
Mr.
E.
Howard, BECo Vice President-Engineering and Quality Assurance presented a brief description of safety enhancement modifications which will be implemented during the current outage. Mr. Bird then stated that a three-or four-shift operator rota-tion will be used during the restart instead of the six-shift rotation discussed at a previous NRC management meeting. This change will provide more operator experience on each shift.
I Six areas requiring continued communication between the NRC staff and the l licensee were identified.
These six areas, as well as NRC and BECo con-tacts responsible for followup, are described below.
1.
The NRC staff will need to review the licensee's process and criteria for determining those maintenance requests which require closure { prior to restart.
Contacts - Lead / Alternate i NRC: J. Wiggins, RI/M. McBride, SRI BECo: R. Ledgett i 2.
The licensee should provide the results of the recently conducted Institute of Nuclear Power Operation maintenance self assessment report and the licensee's plans for addressing these results.
Contacts - Lead / Alternate l NRC: J. Wiggins, RI/M. McBride, SRI i BECo: R. Ledgett ___ - - _- _ O
_ _ - _ _ .. .. , 3.
The licensee and the NRC staff need to closely review the status of revision 4 of the Emergency Procedure Guidelines, the changes made to BEco Emergency Operating procedures, and associated operator training.
Contact - Lead / Alternate NRC: B. Boger, NRR/R. Keller, RI BECo: R. Ledgett ) 4.
The licensee should arrange to provide to NRR detailed information regarding the proposed safety enhancement program modifications and , any associated licensing submittals as soon as possible.
Contact - Lead / Alternate ] l NRC: W. Kane, RI/B. Boger, NRR i BECo: E. Howard/J. Fulton 5.
The licensee should provide a. detailed, graduated power ascension test program with provisions for an internal self assessment during startup.
This assessment should be done by line management and should stress communicating lessons learned from the restart to the organization.
Contact - Lead / Alternate NRC: J. Wiggins, RI/B. Boger, NRR > BECo: R. Ledgett I 6.
The licensee should arrange to provide NRC detailed information regarding fire protection work expected to be outstanding as of plant startup, the potential impact of NRC not approving the existing fire protection exemption requests prior to startup and those fire pro-tection compensatory measures expected to be in place at startup.
Contact - Lead /Alterr. ate NRC: B. Boger, NRR/C. Anderson, RI BECo: R. Ledgett The visual aids utilized during the presentations are attached for infor-mation.
.
.- .-
3.0 Concluding Statements In' closing Mr. Russell stressed that the NRC assessment' of licensee readiness for restart will include programmatic inspections, a team inspection and at least one full Commission briefing.
This process is expected to take about six to eight weeks and.sh..uld begin after the i submission of the licensee's restart readiness assessment _ report.
' i i ! ! ! u i l
' l '
, '( MEETING ATTENDEES 50-293/87-28 U.,S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission W. T. Russell, NRC:RI, Regional Administrator J. Allan, NRC:RI, Deputy Regional Administrator "#. F. Kane, NRC:RI, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP);. ^ T. Martin, NRC:RI, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards (DRSS) W. Johnston, NRC:RI, Director, (Acting) Division of Reactor Safety (DRS) 5. J. Collins, NRC:RI, Deputy Director, DRP R. Bellamy, NRC:RI, Chief, EP&RPB, DRSS J. Gutierrez, NRC:RI, Regional Counsel e . J. T. Wiggins, NRC:RI, Chief, Reactor Projects Section t h DRP 3, ' M. McBride, NRC, Senior Resident Inspector .., J. Lyash, NRC, Resident Inspec t t T. Kim, NRC, Resident Inspect- . D. Florek, NRC:RI, Acting Test rogram Section Chief, DRS F. J. Miraglia, NRC:NRR, Assoc, ate Director for Projects
8. Boger, NRC:NRR, Assistant Director Region I Reactors ' O. Gormley, NRC:NRR, Project Engineer Boston Edison Company (BECo) R. G. Bird, BECo, Senior V.P. - Nuclear ' E. Howard, BECo, V.P. - Nuclear Engineering and QA ' R. Ledgett, BECo, Executive Assistant to Senior V.P. - Nuclear K. Roberts, BECo, Nuclear Operations Manager D. Gillispie, BECo, Director Planning & Restart
J. Fulton, BECo, Staff Assistant. V.P. - Nuclear ' E. Robinson, BECo, Manager Nuclear Information l ) e i ( , i
. . HANDOUTS for J.
E.
HOWARD PRESENTATION 6/29/87
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. . $ MARG O Y R N P A P T M N O E C N M O E S C . ID N E N A O E T N SO E B YTEFA & _ S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ s _ _ - . _ - , _
_ ' s
t* a . . O g . I
.! ) ! O ! : I: S
. - _ ! l
jj id - . -
_ . - _ s W - s .y e c n u i i d c l e o a i P e t R s R i _ t l I n ib G l e a a mn b . _ n o o @ Q i i t r a t a P g n r n R k o e d n i p n n C O a a @h P e . R l t e n c d h P I W v e t o t i B o d s o s r i t e s i p c n s c e G t i r u n mc m e d d fa A d e e T I r r D e n R r o n t U a t M C a e D o p - R R R s f l t r o - e n e l t r N o y ne P t t b W od @ _ o a n R B_ si ic y t r e d s e e p e dc c v i EA n E t v O r s e E i t I s e o n ne g C M n n h p e og e r i t p d t a o a m m u s p r n i S c o E s T .- N M i e c Ba A D R d s t
f t n e n a n o A e h e e i i s a t r hr t mT i t l t r io o e n s b s v i E M WC p e e a s e e mr p e r p e a s u S da u u
@ v d s s A n o ef S o e C so
M t r c E U n R t p o n y e s i mP a t o s ye r t g a s o e c e e t n l l i P f l t p v n b e a f S n s t n n o i @ c u l a i l t e e eq a i e d R f e v P a e v l f B r s i f
c Es A i
e U s tn p l c c n l T I.
n o e a e O e i a A f e e i o m v o h c rC r e e a a R G e y i e r G t e p d s c c r l s p n e p v S n t E t mime mome ha h ff S m g g g E I y i A r i r r C d e f r st s i e e n mr e o g ni n l l I i I R T a E u T a .b i s s P ea e . r f e n g me sb s y s e eo e s E r a i n o y h hr h t . i n v d o l r a T TP T e f e e n e n N d R a L P A
2
. . . I - - - - - . I1l l l !
. - pmu . g M I . A c R i ts G in - _ O m i ' r R e te P D d T n - . N Ac s t s E i t t n .- s e n .. M m m e L i " l i s b n e a v e E o b o v it r o . C o a p r r p c P m m N if I i h d e I A to o r m B M u H e d t - t e s s n c y . N e e o S sy m P n r E t p la i s e n u n m - , Y A q o g e i E t n g , T y a i t t r n an e n e E i f a p a a s a r ' F n S P O T M l t e A m S e l - + - . - E . m - a . ' re - orP . . -
- tne mevorp . m u M Ie l u A b m i t s R n s e o G m P e h O g t i d W R e u l s J b P a n t t d e r n l i e A T a m p v t e x N A v l E u i o E m r n B a p O s M h T I d A e m e h E c l e s a a t l a o C o c b B n s B i . i N r h o g e s n s p c P A p T y e i i e s t i l f D H A ib d i t a l e n a N p c e u n d t a E e I p C ir o e t e t c Y n n p t x r o a l T E To C P E t e e l s E r z o a y F M le p la A l e l e a r n S h r P A a T P e A - - lb e m u e s ~ s r s u . - A P - - . . . . t . . ll ll !
devor . M pp A A R o t G n I s s m O t a , R u r l s g P e o R r T P la y N c r i t E s ty u M h la d n n E c A I a e C o d h N r n . T p A e A p s s e I s n g n n c n H A g o t n h t a f i i i c e N s t a c e a r m x E D c P e E f v T i l l Y n i a d s a o o l u o t n v i T t o g n a i t p M u i l E e d a t n I m i c t e r n e F n n c e i v r h o A o a o p r t f a i l r c n C P P O T A I T S e t n a i r - - - - a - g t e n t i , n aM' I - - - . . . , l
i : l1 ! -
' ? - W - M lavo me - G R - - t p n a u o O e e i t H k a a r B y M e I a p - c V O P - - e P I D C R I r C o f F O R f d e e c O T r z u_ n N iS o o S it - a E a l r k a y u ] c n r l a o p D o M M t p t i t e a S u i h r R m d S e n d T - n ia A n d e m C a 'o H o t M e n G - - R g . e l f e W B T R r x - s t E e iN I t A n o i e T o D m T I V e r d E e s r l L T T e h i lo - g T - T o r D P e g n n a A tn o h E n I l o L C fO r is e t d n n t s a e t i e W v o o u _ r i p o P t o p e p t r id T k u r m e d i c S F S A _ I _ I a M - lB TE n
, _ . I o - . . A _ i
t _ a _ S tS . I . . . _ - = _ _ -
W $ S . O . S se ? g na h C c i $ go $ L
m m e 0_I a t e s t ts y m y S S a S $ m n r C W o p c L T i $a i t S B A r a T z a S r p i Sl r t . r o p i u r u o F m s T o F u s P e p s h i r n s p m t o y c r r e u i I W la D P i o n c B
e A t R c re i d t t n e G p a a $ e h u m w i c C k o d s A c t e irn R a u e n E T B A F a . r S T d
S-e U tap ic E i tn S A
' .
- '
no i tc l u o . . d r t e n R o y C w a M o r e p r lF S u A s d s l l n e e R A w rp y r G e r e g D v n O a f O h O t R C e ne P c e r m u n lz T z o i o S a t N N n la o n n E g o C y s i i s t - M k l e d k p i c p D d E u a u s A t S s y S C e a n - n e r R N R H i p a go S M R r A l t l i e o o H w T T N e m e y t N c r n r i n D T-V T e e E a f r m O e l t o g o n n o n r Y I P o f o r L T r i t n e e t o d a E P z a s v i e i F n m W t se o i r r e t e p p A m p r u m i n O F S I S ia tn - - . - o .C . . . , , - '
-
f f o O la tn e c e m c m n i o a a e t r u r g , F s e a s h I p n o e O a t B h M d T n e Y se e A.
v u c o R s n n r s
A g p I S i m t s s s e M n e i I s D e u y o d s l t M T i s a n c I c n a s U A a A P o l l n c e i y g t i S r n te n a e h f i c v M t i c a s l e e S p i S T x p A x e E e e v A i R p e l v s l o n h a l G m s e
n g o o e h O C R e i n t r i i s o p c d R T m.
n d es P s d o a A h n e C n g T d o y E n ts i d N A 's m M l y p o y f t i E mt E e a e e t f n n M . od ai h S d r o g gP n T n I E f I y ie r n o s B C Pa B t t t s n d l t N nS u e e I s t en e e m c A mi s t e o R i s t p et r e e H c a e h v x n E ng p T I N ai x t s hi E nM E e e t e i r s r f E d a An A e l nS Y yn c s e s eT t c t i B T eA n t ni n N f h eL ese gP
an c mg mi n S o e t t t T e n ei i IM mt i vi vi uA l t n n ie d oa ob A iy r v a r r r a t t ge o pe pp nef S mp ma o a y . i r r l O C CS r PP B I I a - . m , - - - - - mu S . . . . m !
- - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - , j ' ENCLOSURES .. . ...
i HANDOUTS for R. G.
BIRD \\ PRESENTATION ] \\ 6/29/87 j l i ) ! (NOTE: Separate Handouts for J.
E. Howard Presentation] l i l i _ _ -
I lf i1 I] - . .. ' ' .. -
1 - - /6
~
/6 _ g
n
- /
i
k
c
/ a
_
. rxe
Td
- /
n
I
t
/ cn N '
4 _ o ei _.
jt
o a
- /
n ri
9
1 l Pm a
_ - _ o- / . a G
. t
nn
8 _.
_
9 o - oc - /
ie
8 tD
a
/ - d ne
_ _ i t
mh
- /
- g
i 1 2 e aW t - /2 - n
2 o
- /
c
- 1 7 _ . e - D - /
__ -
_ -
-/ _ - -
_ _ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0
0
0
0
0 O
0
0
0
0
0
8
4
0
6
2 -
1
1
1 _ - ! i-l > a
- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . .*; l. . , .. - ' Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Conta.mination Level
As.cio-ss-se i Clean <1k 44.1% Cont. 21k <10k 25.2% - . Cont. 210k <50k 9.8%
l ! Controlled Area Contamination Status
Areas by Contamination Level f as of 6/18/87 ] Clean <1k 52.3% ^- <m ! ' , i - l- - ., ' gqEQ [- ^ Cont 150k' 2% - Cont. 210k <50k 1.9% ] .
' f I - . i ' f _ _ - _-
Cont. 21k <10k 43.7%. i l I _ _....... .. .. . .. . .. . _ _ _ _ _ _
~ .
.
T . N - fB E G - M UA E
L
P ~ M
7
O
. C g C E A _ u D e R r _ o f O e B T sn A o
it
a R r L e U p i _ l J O _ . P ms _
a e O w _ _ x v
E a w e L R w . R O.
O m
sR s T _ - o N a e r - U o C w J M A 58 1 E w )3 R m
D w
B E w EF S w N w E w C w , L - - - - - L
0
2
5
2
1
(
_..- -- _ _- _
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION REPORT - PERFORMANCE MONITORING , Maintenance Requests (MR's) * ' .
1600 - { 1400 --
1200-- -e#e# { ,e - , No-e . ' 1000 - - N, Goal < 500 800 - ,_ _ - 800 . )
400 - RFO#7 200- $ - 1r l . . . . . . . . . . . . o Jun Jul Aug sep ,.Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 70N 1986 1987 Maintenance Requests (MR's)
Greater Than 3 Months Old * i 100%.. 90%< 80% - , , ' ~
70% - e %,N, 80%. e e' , SN- - J 40% - 30% - RFO#7 2n-1" j 3r 0% e- . . . . . . . . . . Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May { 1986 1967
- This quantity depicts the MR's with respect to the INPO definition (i.e.,
excludes preventive maintenance, technical specification surveillance, major modification work, etc.)
k i .INPO Industrial averaae I 7.1 i _ - - - _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - !
, EC x . N
AN \\.s ETN , .\\ A - I . ' M N M , T ~ ,N l E SY , S s e ' ,N N O IT , C ET - O -. R -- P -. l E R ' N IF ' - -
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
1 ,
.'< 's
I
... . O PILGRIM RESTART PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS l I.
Programmatic Management Improvements A.
Significant organizational and personnel changes B.
Increased staffing and support
II.
Specific Restart Prerequisites, l Associated Actions and Acceptance Criteria for Resolution l A.
Plant Operations B.
Radiological Controls C.
Quality Assurance D.
Maintenance E.
Surveillance F.
Fire Protection G.
Emergency Preparedness H.
Security and Safeguards I.
Outage Management, Modifications Technical Support Activities J.
Licensing Activities ' K.
Training and Qualification Effectiveness L.
Engineering and Corporate Technical Support i III. Existing Processes for Documentation, Prioritization,
and Timely and Effective Closure of Multiple Work Items
A.
Refueling Outage Work
B.
Maintenance Work l C.
QA audit / surveillance results D.
General documents, prioritization and closure of other multiple work items j IV.
Processes to Ensure System Restoration, Operability and Readiness j j A.
Plant Operational Condition Change Checklists B.
Systems Group , i , i
. . j
- _ _. - - - _ . _ _ _ . . . _ ._ --. sus.
. , .. . i V.
New Initiatives for Program Improvement A.
Work Control - Documentation, Prioritization,' Planning, Scheduling, and closure l B.
Maintenance Improvement , C.
Radiological Control I D.
Development of long term permanent organization , VI.
Power' Ascension Program, Holdpoints and ~ Regulatory Approval l i '1
l-l
6 .
q
' ENCLOSURE . y-i , r.
. A ! il'l I, Il I - - V !l
li i . :
1l8
'
1 i
I ' t ,........ 4 . , ,,i lll.
lblil '
i,
ll1 . ii ! . \\ . -l.
. -lli . ! -
-- H ll - ! - -- ... a cc , lI < u l ,
- 'i' g i O [ s: ! ' o
.;! . . ._J l LL A l i.
Z I " '-------- Illl8l < V-H - Ol - J J Jl , l- _ 0-i il.
p,_ g , CC
- i F-I
-....;: lllil <. . , <
CD $ 'II'l!l ~ ' j .
W ,v1'I l i - , G L .i ! ii!I litg j - -
. illI 11lll . ilhil --
' ! . . ...... .... . ~.. .. . . -. i }}