IR 05000293/1986041
| ML20207L050 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 12/19/1986 |
| From: | Wiggins J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207K456 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-293-86-41-MM, NUDOCS 8701090605 | |
| Download: ML20207L050 (133) | |
Text
1
,
ATTACHMENT 2 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Meeting No.:
50-293/86-41 Docket No.:
50-293 License No.:
DPR-35 Licensee:
Boston Edison Company M/C Nuclear 800 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts Facility Name:
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Meeting Location:
Boston Edison's Chiltonville Training Facility Meeting Conducted: November 24, 1986 Prepared By:
J. Lyash, Resident Inspector Reviewed By:
M. McBride, Senior Resident Inspector Approved By:
l_ _ _M l
IT b ggins, Thief', gojects Section Date J.
IB RP O
Meeting Summary: A management meeting was held at Boston Edison Company's Chiltonville Training Facility on November 24, 1986 to discuss plant status, the status of licensee management system improvements, SALP improvement status, Mark I Containment enhancement and a number of other issues. The meeting lasted about five hours. Members of the state legislature, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Massachusetts Civil Defense Agency, INPO, Town of Plymouth Advisory Committee on Nuclear Matters, and the press attended the meeting.
.
gro: M M@d?
O
_
DETAILS-1.0 Purpose The management conference was held at the request of NRC Region I.
The licensee was asked to discuss program improvements and other topics of interest at the plant.
.
2.0 Meeting Summary The meeting was opened with brief comments by NRC Region I Administrator, Dr. T. Murley, and Boston Edison President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. S. J. Sweeney. Boston Edison Chief Operating Officer, J. M. Lydon, began the presentations with an overview of the newly implemented work activities management system.
Subsequent presentations addressed the status of overall backlog item resolution and individual section plans and progress. NRC regional management requested that reports documenting the progress of backlog reduction and the percentage resolved be provided for review by the resident inspectors.
Proper prioritization of out-standing items to ensure completion prior to plant restart was stressed.
The Operations Department Section Head discussed ongoing efforts and plans to address the licensed operator staffing shortage. The low number of licensed reactor operators continues to be a problem.
The licensee's Radiological Section Head summarized Boston Edison's perspectives on the progress of the Radiological Improvement Program (RIP) and results of a recent NRC inspection of the RIP. Dr. Murley stressed that the NRC is not yet satisfied with the program.
The implementation of the program and its effectiveness in assuring the safety of day-to-day activities is critical. The NRC will evaluate this implementation during future inspections.
Additional presentations reviewed: 1) the status of organizational changes and stafftag, 2) primary containment enhancements, 3) fire protection program status and 4) emergency planning.
Visual aids utilized during the presentations are enclosed for information.
3.0 Concluding Statements Dr. Murley closed the meeting by indicating that program improvement ef-forts appear to be having a positive impact.
Licensee progress in address-ing both backlog and current issues prior to plant restart will continue to receive close NRC attention.
Further, Dr. Murley indicated that the containment enhancements planned by Boston Edison during the current out-age are commendable and a sign of licensee management's positive approach to this issue.
Dr. Murley requested that the next management meeting be scheduled in late January, 1987.
.
. - _ -
.---_
___
._.
._
.
.-
.
MEETING ATTENDEES 50-293/86-41 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission T. Murley Regional Administrator W. Kane Director Division of Reactor Projects R. Bernero Director, BWR Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
S. Ebneter Director, Divison of Reactor Safety R. Bellamy Chief, Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection Branch J. Strosnider Chief, Materials & Processes Section J. Wiggins Chief, Reactor Projects Section IB M. McBride Senior Resident Inspector, Pilgrim J. Lyash Resident Inspector, Pilgrim R. Auluck Project Manager, NRR
.
Boston Edison Company (BECo)
S. Sweeney President and CEO J. Lydon Chief Operating Officer J. Tyrbell Executive Vice President E. Howard Vice President - Engineering & QA
-
A. Oxsen Vice President - Nuclear Operations C. Gustin Vice President - Corporate Relations-A. Pederson Plant Manager K. Roberts Director of Outage Management R. Swanson Nuclear Engineering Manager S. Hudson Operations Section Head
'
-
N. Brosee Maintenance Section Manager J. Seery Technical Section Manager
[
T. Sowdon Radiological Section Manager E. Ziemianski Nuclear Management Services Section Manager R. Grazio Field Engineering Sectior. Manager J. Ashkar Assistant to the Presider.t J. Fulton Staff-Vice President Nuclear Operations W. Frigard Senior Counsel W. Stowe Legal Department D. Horan Legal Department R. Silva Emergency Preparedness Coordinator L. Mcdonald Planning and Scheduling R. Tis Public Information M. Monahan Public Information
.
P. Hamilton Compliance D. Tepper Human Resource Consultant i
i i
.
_.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
_ _ _
_. _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _.... _ _
.
.
-Other Attendees C. Barnett Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities P. Garrity Massachusetts Department of Pubite Utilities P. Forman State Representative - Plymouth /Kingston P. Agnes Jr.
Assist. Secretary of Mass. Department of Public Safety T. Matthews Mass. Department of Public Health G. Swible Mass. Department of Public Health R. Boulay Director, Mass. Civil Defense Agency J. Ryan Plymouth Advisory Committee on Nuclear Matters C. Adey Plymouth Advisory Committee on Nuclear Matters T. Bosen Plymouth Advisory Committee on Nuclear Matters B. Conway INP0 - Vice President Press i
F. Creane The Enterprise J. Crockford Patriot Ledger J. Bernstein Old Colony Memorial
l
.
(..
.,
,
.
-
BEC0/NRC MEETING 11/24/86 AGENDA TAB 1 NRC Opening Remarks T. E. Murley
TAB 2 Hork Activities Management J. M. Lydon
TAB 3 Backlog Resolution R. E. Grazio
TAB 4 Management Performance Indicators J. H. Ashkar
Pilgrim Station Status:
Operations Status S. D. Hudson TAB 5
-
Radiological Status T. L. Sowdon
.
TAB 6
-
RIP Order Closeout
TAB 7 Technical Status J. A. Seery
-
Maintenance Status M. N. Brosee
~
TAB 8
-
TAB 9
-
Management Service Status E. J. Ziemianski TAB 10 Containment Enhancement Design /
R. N. Swanson
Schedule Status TAB 11 Organization and Staffing A. L. Oxsen
R. N. Swanson l
TAB 12 Appendix R/ Fire Protection R. Velez
TAB 13 RFO-7 Schedule /Startup Checklist K. P. Roberts
TAB 14 Emergency Planning R. E. Silva
'
TAB 15 BECo Up,date on Various Activities A. L. Oxsen
,
l l
I
,
.
...
- - -
n._. _ _ -..,,. _,,, -,.. _ _.,,, _ _,
_ _ _ _,, _,, _ _,,,, _ _ _ _ _,, _ _,
_
_ _ _ _ _,, _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
,
.. _
-
.
_
-
_
O
.-
.
.
.l t
!
I i
WORK CONTROL PROCESS l,
.
,
i l
\\
l l
'
BACKLOG (PRIOR 9/1/86)
!
I
!
NEW WORK
.-
(AFTER 9/1/86)
'
i
.
)
.
.
k
.
.
,
,O-
- ,_
!
!
OBJECTIVES
.
l
-
!
~lDENTIFY ALL UNDERLYING WORK ACTIVITIES
1
-
,
f ESTABLISH ACdOUNTABILTY L
'
j
.
h l
!
'
DISPOSITION OF ALL ACTIVITIES i
'
.
. _ _ _, -
__
--
WORK SOURCE DEFINITIONS
NRCCC NRC ON SITE INSPECTIONS OPEN ITEMS DR'S QA DEFICIENCY REPORTS RESPONSE / ACTION ITEMS NSRAC NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW AND AUDITCOMMITTEE ISSUES RA&P (LIC)
REG AFFAIR & PERFORMANCE GROUP COMMITMENTS / ACTION ITEMS F&M FAILURE AND MALFUNCTIONS RESPONSE AND ACTION ITFJAS INPO INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS COMMITMENTS SALP SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENTOF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REP ACTION ITEMS ORC OPERATIONS REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUEST / ACTION ITEMS spi SECURITY PROGRAM OF IMPROVEMENTS ACTION ITEMS OERP CPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM RESPONSES / ACTION ITEMS QAR OUALITY ASSURANCE RECOMMENDATION RESPONSES / ACTION ITEMS ANI AMERICAN NUCLEAR INSURERS COMMITMENTS / ACTION ITEMS EP EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTION ITEMS ESR ENGINEERING SUPPORTREQUESTS PDC PLANTDESIGN CHANGES PCAO
_
POTENTIAL CONDITION ADVERSE TO QUALITY ISSUES MCAR MANAGEMENTCORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS NCR NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS BNP BROKEN NOTIFICATION POINTS'
SMA STOCK MA'IERIAL AUTHORIZATIONS
,
SPECINO STORES DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATON INQUIRIES h
TEMP MODS TEMPORARYMOOlFICATIONS PlP'S
._
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ACTION ITEMS ROCS RADIOLOGICAL OVERSITE COMMITTEE ACTION ITEMS
-
RIP RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OPEN ITEMS LER'S LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS RESPONSES / ACTION ITEMS i
T.S.REV PL&G PICKARD. LOWE, & GARRICK TECH. SPEC. REVIEW ACTION ITEMS DON DESIGN DEFICIENCIES NOTICES ROR RADIOLOGICALOCCURRENCE REPORTS M R'S MAINTENANCE REQUESTS
!
AIP'S AVAILABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
.
t
_.
-., - -. -
,,,. - -
, - - - - - - - -
,----------,--v~
- - - ~ ~ - ~ " ~ ' * ~ - ~ ' - - ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ^ ' ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ ' ' ' ' - -
g-
- -
.
.
ACCOUNTABILITY (OWNERS)
NUCLEAR DEPARTMENTS / FUNCTIONS SECTIONS
.
'
ENGINEERING
-
OPERATIONS OUTAGE MANAGEMENT
-
RADIOLOGICAL
,
TECHNICAL NUCLEAR OPERATIONS
-
.
!
'
MAINTENANCE l
- QUALITY ASSURANCE /
l QUALITY CONTROL SECURITY / TRAINING
-
.
FIRE PROTECTION / COMPLIANCE NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES
,
l t
ORGANIZATION STAFF
-
,
.
.
-
_.
Q'
'T.
- ">
-
DISPOSITION OF ACTIVITIES I
SOURCE DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDENCE
-
(EXTERNAL / INTERNAL)
WAR ROOM
-
i SELECTIVE REVIEW a
,
i f
-
DETERMINE TRACK ASSIGN ACTION DEVELOP PROGRESS
!
CORRECTIVE ACTION -+
PRIMARY 4 REQUIRED, +
PLAN &
&
i PROGRAMS
!
OWNER PRIORITY, SCHEDULE MONITOR
& URGENCY PERFORMANCE
.
i
!
INDICATORS
.
- i
.
<
I i
i i
!
-
AUDITS / INSPECTIONS
-
i
'
!
i i
i
i i
-
>lt ACCOUNTABILITY >!<
DISPOSITION & MANAGE
>
lt WORK ACTIVITIES
,
i
- -
._
?,
.
..
y
_
,
,
.
,
,
STATUS OF BACKLOG (8/L). IIAR ROOM (M/ fed). Ape NEW IIORK (NW/tIK) ITEMS IN THE N.R.C. CChedITMDiT 00NTROL PROGRAtt AS OF 11-19-66 8/L 8/L 8/L M/Inf M/ Val M/Ind NW/tIK NN/tIK NW/tIK RESPONSIBILITY......................
TOTAL CnF LT OPEN TOTAL CaFLT OPEN TOTAL CnFLT OPEN NED
29
39
31
2 2e ledSD
3
1
1 NOD
2
l NOD - MAINTENANCE SECTION
14
39
31
3
MOD - MANAGDfENT SERVICES SECTION
22
19
12
3
NOD - OPERATIONS SECTION
30
28
24
12
N00 - RADIOLOGICAL SECTION
42
2
18
9 NOD - TECMICAL SECTION
8
4
6
mi
2
1
3
2 OAD
9
2
V.P. - NUCLEAR ENG.' & QUALITY ASSUR.
1
2
V.P. - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS
8,
1
2
1
- - -
- -
- - -
447 156 291 134
107 124
92 12 recorde listed.
.
,
,
.
S s
..
.
.
.
..
.
..
..
.
.
.
-
- - -
- - - -
- -
-
.
_
-
-
(3
-
C
,
l SUMMARY l
OVERALL WORK CONTROL PLAN l
l
.
.
.
DISPOSITION BACKLOG WORK
.
COMPLETE WORK PRIOR TO STARTUP PLhN AND SCHEDULE WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED AFTER STARTUP l
'
DISPOSITION NEW WORK TO PRECLUDE NEW BACKLOG FROM DEVELOPING
.
!
-
'
l
)
MONITOR PROGRESS VIA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
.
-
!
,
.
-
l
_
-
__
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -- --
--
-
.
... -
.
.
.
.
..
..
i i
-
-
,
!
!
-
J i
BACKLOG RESOLUTION
i (
,
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
-. - - -
..
.
,
,
R.E. Grazio Field Engineering Section Manager November 24, 1986
-
,
-
.
'
.-.
..
,
.
!
t
.
i
!
\\
.
!
BACKLOG RESOLUTION HAS BOTH A NEAR TERM i
l AND A LONG TERM PURPOSE
-
i
!
-
i Near Term: Recommend How The Backlog Will j
-
l Be Dispositioned
-
i l
l
'
Long Term: Improve Work Management to Solve
I
-
'
Problems Rather Than Address Symptoms
.
L e
e
"
~~
...
g
.
.
,
,
i
)
-
i l
BACKLOG WORK TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR-
I TO STARTUP HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTIFIED
!
!
!
. Complete Commitments Required Before Startup i
i l
. Address important Evaluation items (SALP, INPO)
i
-
i
,
!
. Implement improvements Requiring Plant Outage
,
l
.
l
,
-
-
.
_
m
.
.
,
,
.
SOME CURRENT BACKLOG WILL BE PERFORMED AFTER STARTUP l
'
l I
Long Term Program Will Become A Management Commitment Tool
!
.
Emergent Work Will Be Integrated With Backlog Solution Of Broad Problems Will Become Basis For Setting Priorities
.
Resolution Of Backlog Will Be Performed Aggressively
.
.... - -
w
-
.
. -_ _ _.
.
.
.
.-
'
PART OF SUCCESSFUL BACKLOG RESOLUTION IS PREVENTING A NEW BACKLOG FROM FORMING
,
l l
Categorize Potential Work Based On Systems / Programs
-
l
.
i i
j Define Problems On A System /l rogram Basis
-
!
!
-
'
Prioritize Work Based Upon Problem Solutions l
-
.
!
.
.
Monitor Plant Performance To Verify Effectiveness Of Solutions
-
i
-
l
.
--.
-
-
-
.
-
-.
..
-
Q'
<T.
- '-
.
.
i
~
TWO SEPARATE EFFORTS ARE
'
)
ATTACKING THE BACKLOG
.
.
j i
"Section Backlog"
- Work Requiring Resources From A
.
Single Section/ Department
.
!
- Work Not Yet Scoped Sufficiently For Planning i
l
-
" Organization Backlog"
- Work Requiring Resources From More Than i
.
l One Section/ Department l
i I
!
'
l
.
.
l
-
-
, ~.
.
,
,
\\
'
THE ORGANIZATION BACKLOG IS LARGE
!
AND REQUIRES A SUBSTANTIAL COMMITMENT
!
!
!
.
!
!
Work Analysis And Review" Method Was Used
"
.
!
Key Managers invested A Total Of 20 Man-Weeks
Over 1000 Significant Activities Were Analyzed j
l l
- Benefit j-Items Required For Startup i
- Problem Statements Generated Where Appropriate
'
.
l
'
.
War Room" Outputs input To Outage Planning And
"
l Parallel Executive Review
-
l Non Outage Scope Will Be Planned Before Startup
.
.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - -
0'
?-
'
'
l
.
.
THE WAR ROOM RECOMMENDS COMPLETION OF MORE'
!
THAN 50% OF THE ORGANIZATION BACKLOG BEFORE STARTUP
i
.
Sent To War Room 1281 Dispositioned To Section Backlog 425
,
I Total Organization Backlog-856
!
l
-
Completed Or Ca'ncelled During War Room 180
-
Complete Before Startup 332 l
Complete After Startup 306 Under Further Review
.
.
..
.
. - _ _
_
_
_
.
._.
.
- -.
,
,,
l
_
,
.
FUTURE USE OF WORK ANALYSIS AND REVIEW WILL IMPROVE PRESENT WORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
'
i l
.
. System / Program Format Assures Common Basis For Work Management l
Problem Statements Provide Basis For Resource Allocation
-
!
!
Combining Operational And Engineering Perspectives Allows A
More Complete Perspective
!
'
Monitoring Results Of Completed Work Will Verify Effectiveness
Of Solutions
-
,
.
.
i l
l
^gT
.. ~,
,
,
I
!
,
I
-
i
!
PILGRIM STATION
~
!
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PROGRAVI
!,
i
-
l
-
O Background i
!
l Purpose of revised indicator system i
\\
-
l Revision process and current status i
l
'
l Remaining plans
.
. -
). -
,,
g-
.
!
,
,
i i
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR BACKGROUND i
i
<
l
,
.
Started in 1985
!
,
,
-
!
INPO Overall Indicators
_
.
I
'
i
!
Currently 39 Reports
'-
!
-
l t
.
!
!
i i
!
..
-
.
.
-
..
.
-
,
fww... u.= =wnw o e a w vrew....
4.'adTf?HING
.
Gd
-
i i
{
.
,.
--
'
.
{~*
e
.,
-
-
.
.
.
.
Forced Outage Rate
~
= =.m.,
%-
1eem r
w
.
e M<
.
ses.
.
.
m.
.
- ~
ses.
.
,
aos.
'"8 8L 3 Aseenen C
.
2 Assesser C 4.s.
.
se.
.
.
ses..
,
.
m a
,,--_ _ =
_.
. a.
- _ - _
m e-e-a-a a X e
es -e+e+e+e+eF ";";",,:
- "- : :"- : +e M S:=:= = = =- -
n s.,o,emm nw o.asi r.= w a w a.u a.e e. on sen one m F e m Apr umr.u.u % s, on.
e l
ms is.
i e
.
l
.
.
.
.
l
'
<.-
9,
Percent of planned available time that the unit was not available for production.
,,
i
'-
!
'
s
-.-s--
-.
. _.
.....
l
,
!
i
.. _..,
:- - - - - -.-
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
-
-
.
-
. __
_
.
_
. ~.
.
- ~.
'
I
!
I j
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PURPOSE
'
i
.
l Focus on Overall Results (Mission)
!
'
!
'
-
)
Establish Respo sibiltiy
!
-
l
_
Cover ALL Management Aspects l
l
!
l
-
>
e
.
=
-
-
.
g.
.
.
.-
,
.
i
!
!
'
!
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR j
SELECTION PROCESS & CRITERIA
-
Safety:
Control of Hazards and Risk
'
Nuclear, Radiological, Fire, Security, Ind., Env.
i
!
Z Reliability:
Power Generation-While At Power Outage Control While Off - line
,
Z Management:
.
Effective Compliance with License & Tech Spe6s Effective Prevention of Generation Loss
.
Effective Corrective Action Attainment of High, Third-party Ratings
-
,
-. _ _ _ -
_
._
.
9-
- -
,
.
!
i i
!
!
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
!
ROLE IN MANAGEMENT
.
!
-l l
.
.
Performance Indicator i
Annual Reports Planning / budget
,
.
............................... E x e c u t.iye
.
i
_
.......................... D e p a rt m e n t Section
..............
'
Responsibility
.
'
Management
.
l Reports
,
'r a
a a
a
I
!
Performance
>
Performance Data
!
!
!
--
.
- -
- -
- -
-
-
_-
--
. _ _
_
..
Q'
- T
!
Ei
-
i i
i i
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
1
!
CATEGORIES
-
I i
.
Externalindicator sources
-
General plant / site indicators
-
l Work management system indicators I
!
!
Individual management indicators l
'
General
.
Specific
.
.
-
__ - - _.
- _.
-
-
.
.
l
,
9-
.
!
!
!
PERFORVIANCE INDICATORS
!
EXAMPLES
.
!
CRITEFilA INDICATORS f
E SAFETY:
- of unplanned scrams, lost-time accidents radiation exposure, safety system unavailability i
E RELIABILITY:
Equivalent availability, forced outage rate,
)
outage duration / planned
'
.
-
-
MANAGEMENT: Expense / budget, backlog status, preventative maintenance overdue, training hours / planned, staffing status
.
.
.
.__
.__
__
_.
.
-
_
_
_
-['
@-
,
,
,
REMAINING PLANS
'
.
Performance Indicators Selected Complete Responsibilities Established Complete
.
!
i l
Develop Goals (Trends) & Supporting December
,
i Plans Select Indicator Sub-categories December Plan for New Data Collection December l
Revise Performance Monitoring January
'
.
'
Report Revise Controlling Procedures February i
j implement New Data Collection As Planned l
Plans
.
t
-
--
-
_
- -
-
.___
_
_
._
Q-
- T l
- --;
-
i l
i-l
<
i
!
J i
-
!
OPERATIONS STATUS
.
i
!'
i
-
!
STAFFING
-
l
!
i j
-
-
TRAINING
.
%
!
SIMULATOR
-
i
.
BACKLOG
'
-
t a
.
!
l
.,
l
.
.
i O
StevenD. Hudson l
Operations Section Manager
1
.-
-
-.
-
_ _ -
O
- ~:
j
- 7,
,
.
!
!
!
!
-
l
-
)
OPERATOR STAFFING
.
!
OBJECTIVE
-
!
-
!
A Sufficient Number Of Licensed i
t i
And Non-Licensed Operators To
.
Man A 6 Section Watchbill
-
,
i
.
e e
i
!
.
.
i
~
O-
-_
.
_
l
l
.
BENEFITS TO BE GAINED -
-
-
,
l Normal 40 Hour Work Week Avoids
-
!
Excessive Use of Overtime I
i
.
l l
Allows For Training, Vacation, And Extended Absences
-
i
!
Minimizes Short Term Operator Fatigue
!
-
.
Prevents Long Term Operator Burn-out Which Aids
<
-
Stability Of The Group
t
.
-.
_
.
.-
.
-
..
-.
.
__
Q-q_
'
.
l
!
!
!
l RECENT ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT STAFFING PLAN
,
!
'
i l
.
Complement increased From 39 To 42
.
l 9 Men Take Aptitude Test Nov,1986
-
-
.
p 9 Men Take Aptituda Test Dec 4956
-
Tour School Scheduled For Jan,1987
-
'
.
5 R.O. Candidates Begin School in Jan,1987
-
i
,
I
-
i l
l
.
.
,
- - - -
r
,-
--
-
- - -
- _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _
_ _ _ _
-
- - _
._ -
.
._ ___
_.
-
' l'
~
l
'
,
,
TRAINING SCHEDULE J
F le A
II
1 A
S O
N
J F
ll A
at J
,1 A
fl O
N l} I.I F
M A
M J
J
,
,
'lli 111 I; I Ill 1. I { jail 111 Ill Ill III I
I Ill ill ii III ii g yI Ill II 111 Ill II I
I lii iggiii sii iii'
_
1/5/87 11/12/87 k
7 4EEN.
2 MEN
l CO School a
RO School l
1 28 i
-
s uEN a
-
,_
q
~.
b88 (NRC E'xam)
e
,
'
ULNPO Cont.
RO School
"
(RO Prep.)
vi U
8/15/87
!
y 8/15/87 NLNPO 7/15/88 i
l
'
10 nEEN continuina RO School l
'
(
1/13 5/18 UJ 1/8/87
-,
I Tow ScW
'
(3 On Watch
'
(4 aden (
G.
-
i Q.
i i
O
-
)
p.-
-
iTour School i
.
1/5/87 4/15/87
.
g)
8/30/88 I 11agEN
,'
l lTw m, w y
f 0 88*n g
i
'
,
'
O
~
Licensed RO
'
STA School j
complement aym
]
(C) Cwrent '
t
.
.
j
!
i i
)
l
.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
.
- -.
--
-
-
g-
- ,
.
i LICENSED REACTOR OPERATOR COMPLEMENT i
i i
25 =
l
-
i i
20 -
l
-
l
i 15 -
'
I
12
-
- - - - - - -
0)
'
10 -
"O
'
E i
'
.
I
-
-
s
.
.
NOV 86 APR 87 JUN 87 DEC 87 AUG 88 l
l ASSUME:
1)
N.O. Leaves Operations Before April 87
'
2)
85% Pass R.O. Exam j
3)
1 More R.O. Leaves Operations Before Aug. 88 l
-
. - -. -
- _ _ - _ _ _ _ -.
-
- -
._-
._
.
-_
'
,.
..
i
)
i SIMULATOR STATUS i
-
.
Plant Specific Being Built
-
in Montreal
'
-
'
I l
!
Acceptance Test Program Complete - Feb,1987
-
Prior to Start-Up
-
,
.20 Hours of Hands-On Training per Shift
- Emphasize Normal Plant S/U
and Operating Transients
!
l
.
- Revised Emergency Operating Procedures
!
'
.
.
!
l
,
_-
_-
-.
.
.
,
)
ACTIONS TO ADDRESS OPERATIONS
!
SECTION BACKLOG
-
'
.
204 Items in the Backlog
-
.
Goalis to Disposition Allitems
-
3'
Prior to Start-up
.
Implement Specific items
-
-
Prior to Start-up 2 Beco Engineers Assigned j
-
.
as Co-ordinators i
6 Contractor Engineers on Board
-
-
December 1,1986
,
21% Complete as of Nov 19,1986
-
,
l
'
l
!
-
_ _ _
-
.,
..
,
.
~ DC PMH8MNTAT0@N l
\\
NOV. 24,1986 (
BY
.
O THOMAS L. SOWDON
-
,
~
RADIOLOGICAL SECTION HEAD
.
e
$
I.
.
I
-
. _ _ _ _
__ _-
..
.
.
_. - _ _.._
.._.__
-
.
..
't,
'
OBJECTIVES OF THE RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PROGRAM
'
.
]
AT PILGRIM STATION 1) PROVIDE A SAFE WORKING ENVIRONMENT AT PILGRIM STATION.
!
2) MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO RADIATION EXPOSURE.
~
3) MAINTAIN RADIATION EXPOSURE AT PILGRIM
- @
STATION AS LOW AS REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE
'
(ALARA).
l 4) DEVELOP AN OUTSTANDING RADIATION PROTECTION
'
PROGRAM THATTAKES FULL ADVANTAGE OF THE KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AVAILABLE FROM THE NRC, INPO, AND OTHER REGULATORY AND
'
ADVISORY AGENCIES.
.
.
t
$
. *
F
.
-..
- -,.
- _
..
.
.-.
.
-. -
-
.
.
.-- - -. -
C '.
,
BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM
.
.
1) IMPROVED HEALTH AND SAFETY FOR THE WORKER.
2) IMPROVED WORKER EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS.
3) IMPROVED WORKER ATTITUDES.
,
4) REDUCED COSTS AND NUMBER OF WORKERS.
.
5) INCREASED CONFIDENCE IN BOSTON EDISON'S h
ABILITY TO OPERATE PILGRIM SAFELY AND EFFICIENTLY.
!
-
'
/
.
!
,
e e
C (. -
-...
--
..
. --
-
-. - -----
...
-
--.. - -..
- - -
.. _....
... _,
-.
.
_
_
.
l
-
-
. ~
.
,
STATUS OF THE PROGRAM
'
.
1) SUBSTANTIALIMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE LAST18 MONTHSIN THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
. PROCEDURES AND COMPLIANCE WITH THEM l
. ALARA PROGRAM AWARENESS l
. HEALTH PHYSICS EQUIPMENT
. ACCESSIBILITY & INVOLVEMENT BY RADIATION PROTECTION MGMT TRAINING ( QUALITY, QUANTITY, AND i-DOCUMENTATION )
..
STAFFING
. DECONTAMINATION COMMITMENT
_
. WORK CONTROL AND TRACKING SYSTEMS
/
.
2) THE RECENT RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
'
AUDIT SUGGESTED THAT WE ARE "OVER THE HUMP" BUT SOME WORK REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED.
!
,
.,
.
$
l
!
(~.
l
.
.. - - _. _ -. -
-. - ~.. -.
...
...
.
.- -...
-
_.
_.
,
-
-
-
,..
'
FUTURE PLANS FOR THE PROGRAM
-
.
.
j 1) CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND l
QUALIFICATIONS OF RADIATION PROTECTION l
PERSONNEL.
2) FURTHER UPGRADE PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT.
l 3) FULLY IMPLEMENT THE ALARA PROGRAM AND REDUCE TOTAL STATION EXPOSURE TO A LEVEL WELL BELOW THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.
.
4) IMPROVE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE HEALTH
~
PHYSICS STAFF AND OTHER PLANT GROUPS.
l l
~
5) DEVELOP AN EXCELLENT RADIATION PROGRAM AND-EARN AN EXCELLENT SALP RATING.
.
-
.
$
..-
l,..-
-_ -.
- -
.
-.
. -.
- -
-
-
.
-
-
.-
_
__
- - - - _
_
.
_
_
BACKLOG EFFORT
, (..
..
.
1) CONSIST OF ALL ITEMS IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 1,1986
-
,
2)
NRC INSPECTIONS, INPO ASSESSMENTS, ANI INSPECTIONS, QA SUGGESTIONS, LICENSEE IDENTIFIED OPEN ITEMS, AND OTHER OPEN ITEMS ARE INCLUDED.
>
r 3) ALL TASKS HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
TASK DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED DATE
,
.
COMPLETION CRITERIA DUE DATE
-
PRIORITY MAN-HOURS REQUIRED
.
.
~
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER CHARGE NUMBERS
.
-
4) TOTAL MAN-HOURS TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS HAVE BEEN ESTIMATED.
(APPROXIMATELY 6000 MAN-HOURS)
5)
NECESSARY STAFF TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IS BEING ASSEMBLED. ( 6 TO 8 CONTRACTOR ENGINEERS )
-
.
.
6)
ITEMS HAVE BEEN PRIORITIZED.
7) ALL ITEMS WILL BE DISPOSITIONED BEFORE RESTART.
,,
- '
( 130 ITEMS )
- - -
-.
-
.-
-
-
- -
.
...-. - -
__
_.
"'
BREAKDOWN OF BACKLOG TASKS
-
.
ISSUE
.
OPEN TASKS CLOSED TASKS ( SINCE SEPT.1,86)
NRCCC ITEMS
42 DEFICIENCY REPORTS
0 NSRACITEMS
0 FAILURE AND MALFUNCTIONS
0 INPO ITEMS
0
-
EPITEMS
2 Q
QA RECOMMENDATIONS
0
-
REG AFFAIRS & PROGRAMS ITEMS
0
.
RADIOLOGICAL OVERSIGHT ITEMS
.Q.
TOTALS 130
.
e
$
e f
e
....
..
..
.
..
.
.
..
--
_
_ -.. _ _ _.
- _.
.
RADIOLOGICAL IMPR~OVEMENT PROGRAM
~
.
OPEN ITEMS
'
.
i 1) ALARA PROGRAM 2) ATTITUDE TOWARD RADIATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 3) ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ADHERENCETO RADIOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS
.
@
l
,
l
.
l
.
$
l
,
l
l
-.
...
.
....
- -
.
. -.
-.
.
.
-
- - - - - - - -
r '-
ALARA PROGRAM
.
'
.
1) 14 OUT' OF 18 PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY ORC FOR IMPLEMENTATION.
2) ONGOING ALARA TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR SUPERVISORS AND WORKERS.
3) ALARA EXPOSURE BUDGETS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED FOR RFO #7 AND 1987 FOR EACH SECTION.
THESE
.
.pVDGETS WILL BE ENFORCED BY EACH SECTION MANAGER.
-
,
o
~
-
.
_ --
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
__
.
..
.
_ _ _ -
ATTITUDE TOWARD RADIATION e
PROTECTION
<
REQUIREMENTS
.
1) UPPER MANAGEMENT FULLY SUPPORTS RADIATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF ALL WORK ACTIVITIES.
2) WE ARE IMPROVING THE INTERFACE BETWEEN HEALTH PHYSICS, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATIONS.
3) HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL WILL NOT BE VIEWED
.
AS " POLICEMEN" BUT AS CONSULTANTS TO ASSIST OTHER GROUPS IN EXPOSURE CONTROL AND O
REDUCTION.
/
e l
e e
_
__
-
--
.
-
-
_. -. _ _ _ _.
.. -
..
.
-
U ACCOUNTABILITY FOR AbHERENCE TO RADIOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS
.
1) ALL SECTION MANAGERS ARE TAKING AN AGGRESSIVE ROLE IN ENCOURAGING PERSONNEL ADHERENCE TO HEALTH PHYSICS REQUIREMENTS.
2) SECTION MANAGERS WILL HOLD THEIR SECTIONS ACCOUNTABLE FOR EXPOSURE BUDGETS AND
-
WORKER COMPLIANCE.
O 3) POSITIVE INCENTIVES witt BE OFFERED FOR GOOD
_
PERFORMANCE.
i
.
-
4) THE NUCLEAR OPERATIONS MANAGER HAS ASSUMED THE ROLE OF ALARA COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN.
5) ALARA PERFORMANCE WILL BE INCLUDED IN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS. '
.
$
+
.-
- -
.
.
_ -
-. - -
-
.
-
-
-
. -
.
..
. _.
. _ - _ - _..
...
-
_
. _.
-
.
'
STATION DECONTAMIN-ATION
'
e:.
PROGRAM
~
GOALS:
.
-
'
. TO MAKE AS MANY AREAS OF THE PLANT AS
' PRACTICAL ACCESSIBLE IN STREET CLOTHES TO REDUCE RESPIRATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL IN ALL OTHER AREAS OFTHE PLANT
'
PLANS:
l
. IDENTIFY EQUIPMENT CONTRIBUTING TO
-
CONTAMINATION LEVELS
. CONFINE LEAKS OR REPAIR EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATE AREAS
'
ASSIGNMENTS:
e
.
OPERATIONS-IDENTIFY SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION AND CONFINE IF PRACTICAL
- MAINTENANCE-REPAIR EQUIPMENT AND
'
DECONTAMINATE AREAS l
. RADIOLOGICAL-TRACK, SCHEDULE AND MONITOR
,
.
(-
<
.
-.--. -,-.--.- -
--,.__---_--____..r_
..
- - -....
_,. _.., _ _.,. - - _. - -. _, -. _..
_
Decontamination Project
.:
Goals
-
..
.
-
.
.
.
Contaminated 12649 9.8,"
t
.
t C
-
.
l Total Square Feet
.
e
--
<v-
-
-,,. -, - -.
.
,,,,, _. _ _. _,,.___,
,.,,, _... _ _ _ _ _ - - _.,
, _,,., _
.,, _ _ _,,,.,, _
_,
Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Contamination Level
'
-
.
.
.
Clean <1k 54.3%
.
e
'\\
'
N),
e
-
~. ' = _f Cont. 250k 17.8%
^n=
Cont. 21k <10k 15.8%
e?
'
?&^
_
Cont, 210k <50k 12%
_
/
r Contamination Levels in Dpm/100 sq.cm.
.
'
.
..
_ _ _..
,
. - -
I (.
PROGRESS ON DECONTAMINATION
.
TO DATE
~
1) CONDENSER BAY -WILL BE " STREET CLOTHES' BY
,
NOV. 30,1986 2) HYDRO BLASTED FLOOR DRAINS-REDUCED EXPOSURE BY 151 MANREM FOR RFO #7 3) HYDRO BLASTED CRD HEADERS-REDUCED EXPOSURE BY 60 MANREM FOR RFO #7 4) ELIMINATED RESPIRATORY PROTECTION FOR 12
-
AREAS 5) REDUCED 14 AREAS TO " STREET CLOTHES"
_
REQUIREMENTS i
I
.
.
f i.
l
.
...
_
. _ _. _. _ _. _
..
...
_
.
-
-
.
Decontamination Project
.
'
(;'
Goal
'
.
.
-
'
.
Contaminated 12449 9.8%
Clean 114900 90.2%
.
O
_
TotaleSquare Feet
.
l o
e
@
,.
-
-.. - -
-
.,or-..-,-.---
-, -,.. -, _. _ _ _ -. _ - -... -. _, _,.. _,..,_.,
__.._.,..,_,,___..m
-,_,_,__ _ _
..
Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Contamination Level
'-
.
t Clean <1k 54.3%
.
~
r
. :
b
r
Cont. 250k 17.8%
-
g g
g Cont. 21k <10k 15.8;; '.
_
e
.
_c q
^
~w Cont.110k <50k 12%
/
.
,
Contamination Levels in Dpm/100 sq.cm.
.
$
$
e
.
- -
- - - -.
... _ - -.
.
..
-
..
.
..
. - -......
c
\\
e
. Fage No.
I 11/14/86 DECONTAMINAi!0N SCHEDULE FOR PNFS
,
,,
,,
,
MEA NEEK AREA INITIAL CONTAMINATION PRIORlif EST ACT
. C.
ENDIN6 CONTAMINAi!ON 60AL
^ CODE HRS HRS t
!
!!/15/86 FAD, DEMIN RESIN ADD. AREA IK-5K (tr
24
.
11/15/B6 COEINSERBAY6'6/A IK-5K (tK
24
3 11/15/86 CONDENSATE PUMP BAY 2K (1K
24
4 11/15/86 A06 1K-70K (1K
24
5 11/15/B6 TIF RDOM 3K (1K
24
6 11/22/96 RCIC (lK-40K (lK
24
7 11/22/B6 CRD QUAD (lK 6/A DNLY (1K
24
8 11/22/06 8 FHR VALVE ROOM 2K-5K (lK
24
9 11/22/86 CFD EEFAIR ROOM 3K (1K 6/A, (10K F TANK
2
.
11/22/06 ERD STORAGE ROOM 4K (lK
24
'N; 11 11/22/86 A RF? VALVE ROOM IK-34K (*180K)
(1K
24
(d
11/22/86 STEAMTUNNEL 21K (10K
24
'
11/22/86 Il7'RB, SHIELD BLOCKS INACCESSABLE (50K
72
14 11/29/86 A RHR QUAD EK-450K (1K
144
'15 11/29/86 P FHR GUAD IK-20K (*60Ki (!K
144
16 12/06/06 F E U FUMP F00M IK-40K is!BOK)
(!K GIA, (10K PUPJS
24
17 12/06/06 F E U Hx ROCM IK-20K D600 (IK 6/A, (10s Hx
24
18 12/06/06 FUEL FOOL FILTER ROOM 5K (lK
24
19 12/06/66 FUEL P00L Hx R00M IK-12K kit 6/A,(10KHx
24
20 12/06/86 H9tDING PUMP ROOM 194K (10K
24
21 12/13/06 CHEM NASTE PUMP' ROOM 10E-80K (lr
24
-
o
12/13/06 CHEN kASTE TANK ROOM 155K (10K
24
23 12/13/86 TREATED WATER FUMP ROOM 4K-20K (tr
24
, 24 12/13!86 TREATED NATER TANK ROGM BK (10k
24
23 12/13/06 CONCENTRATOR CONSOLE GALLERY 20K (1K
2
26 12/13/96 RIN MONITOR PUMP R00M 78K (1K
24
. - -
- -
-
. -
e Fage No.
,
ll/14IB6
"
DECONTAMINATION SCHEDULE F0R FNFS
-*
( ',
AREA WEEK AREA IN!ilAL CONTAMINAi!0N P;1DRITY EST ACT NO.
ENDING 20NTAMINATION 60AL CODE HRS HRS
.
12/13/86-9' D/W UhDER VESSEL eRad (50K
268.
2B 12/13/06 SLUDE PUMP ROOM 27K (10K
24
29 12/20/96 FLATEED FILTER ROGN A 3K-12K (10K
24
30 12/20/06 FLATBED FILTER ROOM B 6K-30K 960K)
(10K
24
31 12/20/06 SOLID PAC ROOM 147K (10K
24
32 12/20/06 FLOC RECYCLE ROOM 161K (10K
48
33 12/20/B6 SLURRY TANK AREA IK-6V (tr
24
34 11/20/86 CHEM FILTER POOM 50K (10K
24
35 12/20/66 TOP OF CHEM FILTER R00M 2K (lK
24
~
12/27/06 FILTRATE PUMP ROOM BK-100K (50K
24
m (
)37 12/27/06 F/W SUMP AREA 6K-100K (50K
24
v
12/27/06 6 I 6 ROOM 500K (50K
24
_
12/27/66 KING KONS F00M 220K i
(50K
24.
40 12/27/B6 SFENT EESIN TANr. AND FUMP RM mrad (50K
24
41 12/27/66-13' R/W GIA 2K-10K (lK
24
42 12/27/86 HFCI IK-4K (lK
24
'
12/27/06 FISC. WASTE PUMP ROOM IOK (lK
6
44 12/27/66 FISC WASTE TANK EDOM 3K qK
6
43 01/10/67 COND. DEMIN. TANK ROOM A and B 12K (!r
24
86 01/10/B7 COND. DEMIN. REGEM. R00M IK-5K (!K
24
.
01/10IB7 SANDEDI AREA, EAST AND WEST 2K,
(lK
24
46 01/10/07 CRD ACCUMULA10FS 1.5K (10r
24
47 01/10/S7 UT FESIN CLEANING APEA 2r (tr
24
-
(1/10/87 BAC6 WASH REC. TANT RM. F0YER 81K (10K
24
51 01/10'87 TORUS F00M T0F 60F, BOTT. BK (It
504
52 01/17/67 CLEAu WASTE TANK ROOM mrad (10r
24
_
_ _
-
-
-
-- -.
.
.
- _ _
. _ _
_
.__.
_.
.
..
.,
Page No.
.
11114/86 DECONTAMINATION SCHEDULE FOR PNFS
,,
-
.
HEA NEEK AREA INITIAL CONTAMINAi!0N PRt0RiiY EST ACT C.
EWOING CONTAMINATION 60AL CODE HRS HRS t
01/17/87 CLEAN WASTE PUMP POOM eRad (!K
24
,
01/17/87 R/N' TRUCK LOCK IK-5K (lK
24
-
01/17/07 HOT MACHINE SHOP 5K-22K (lK
24
01/17/87 PEMA!NINS MISC. FLOOR DRAINS VARIABLE S16. DOSE RATE RED.
144
0
/ /
'O O
O
/ /
0
.
m
.
J f
-
,
I t
h (. '.-
.
.
,
-, -, -... -, -, -,,,, - -, - -, -, -.. - - - - - -, - - - - -.. -., -..
. -... - - -..., -.... - -. -,. -, - - - - - -...
Controlled Area Contamination Status (.
Areas by Contaminntion Level Clean <1k 45.1%
'
.
C.2t. 21k <10k 25.1%
Cont. 250k 17.8%
Cont. 210k <50k 12%
.
Contamination Levels in Opm/100 sq.cm.
Controlled Area / Contarnination vs. Cle an
.
- * "
Floor Space gg y
,
E
h f
contarninated
..
,:
$
$
3 3 I
$
$
!' l l clean
s
C
--
-
h h
h h
h h
h 1--
!
E
!
s s
s s3 i,
?
?
?
?
?
?
~
&,a.
?
$
'
Jr
!
!
!
s l @ l
- e--
h h
h h
h I4
s a--
!
!
!
!
!
E s
s s !
""
!
!
!
!
!
E E
!
!
s
""
$
$
s h
h
[' '.
l
S S
-
,
.
S S
S S
?
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Deo as of 11-7_se
-.. - - -
.
-
-.. -.
. -..
.....-
- -
l
'?>
&'
'.
'
'
.
.
TECHNICAL SECTION BACKLOG DISTRIBUTION I
60-O 50 l
)
F
.
i
'
T 30 i
S 20 l
K
E 0 Eii m
i i
i-i i
i i
i i
i
.
LER INPO QADR F&M EMER PIP TEMP NSRAC OAR NRC OERP LICEN
'
PREP MODS
!
DOCUMENT NAME
.
!
E BACKLOGCOMPLETE E BACKLOG
!
-
j i
'
i l
i
-.
-
.
. _ _ - - -.
.-
.
-
g.
.g
.-
,
,
.
PILGRIM STATION TECHNICAL SECTION
.
TECHNICAL SECTION REORGANIZATIUON Objectives
-
-
Old An'd New Organization
Benefits To Be Gained Status And Plans l
'
TECHNICAL SECTION BACKLOG SATUS
.
-
- - -
,9-
,7
-
j OBJECTIVES
Develop " System Specialists", Accountable l
.
l For Performance And Material Condition Of
'
]
Important Plant Systems
.
i
.. Strengthen Program And Methods For Review l
Of Operating Events At Pilgrim And Industry i
l
)
~
Technical Resources Provide Operations Section With Dedicated
.
i
.
Provide Software And Hardware Specialists,
.
Dedicated To Support Three Major Computer l
Systems:
.
'
l Plani Process Computer And SPDS Security Computer
'
-
Training Simulator Computer Apply increased Emphasis To Programs For
-
-
Containment Leak Rate Testing And i
In-Service Testing i
'
..
._ _.
.
-
.
..
9-
.
.
\\
i OLD TECHNICAL SECTION ORGANIZATION j
.
.
l
'
Technical Section
-
!
Manager (1)
!
.
.
l l
l On-site Safety &
Technical Group Performance Grouf
-
Chief Engineer (1)
-
!
Group Leader (1
!
!
- Shift Technical Advisor (10)
- Sr. Mechanical Engr. (1)
l
- Performance Analysis Er.gr. (2)
- Sr. Electrical Engr. (1)
!
- Nuclear Technician (1)
- Sr. I&C Engineer (1)
.
l
- Sr. Waste Mgmt. Engr. (1)
-
!
- Sr. Reactor Engr.
'
- Sr. Chemical Engr. (1)
'
-
- Reactor Engr. (1)
- Nuclear Technician (3)
- S.O.D. Computer Support (4)
'
.
.
-
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __.
_.
__
l[_' a
~ ' ? '.
'
.
NEW TECHNICAL SECTION ORGANIZATION
.
.
Technical Section Manager (1)
Administrative Assistant (1)*
.
I I
Technical Group On-site Safety And
Systems Chief Engineer (1)
Performance Group
,
Group Leader (1).
Group Leader (1)
-Sr. Systems Spbcialist (9)*
-Sr. Mechanical Engineer (1)
-Sr. Reactor Engineer (1)"
-Reactor Engineer (1)"
i-Systems Specialist (3)*
-Sr. Electrical Engineer (1)
-Sr. Engineer - Operating-Sr. l&C Engineer (1)
--Reactor Engineer Techs. (3)"
-Nuclear Ops. Dept. Computer Experience Review (1)"
-Sr. Waste Management Engineer (1)
.
Support Personnel (7)"
-Admin Assist - Operating-Sr. Chemical Engineer (1)
-Performance Analysis
-
Experience Review (1)..
-Technical Engineer (1)
Engineer (2)
,
-Nuclear Technicians (1)
.
-Sr. Engineer - LLRT/lLRT/'
IST (2)"
.
(
)* New Position (
)" Existing Position, But Reorganized (
) Existing Position, Not Reorganized
-
. _.
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
_
@-
??
-
.
,
.
l TECHNICALSECTION
MANAGER
.,
,
!
i ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
.
i
!
'
i SYSTEMS TECHNICAL ON-SITE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE GROUP GROUP GROUP l
l, Reactor Engineering System Specialists Mech, Elect, And
-
.
i & C Component /
'
,
Review
,
Computer Application, Operating Experience Equipmnt Support
-
Operations And Maintenance Rad. waste Support
-
Programs For Containment
[
.
-
Chemistry Support Leak Rate Testing And i
-
)
In-Service Testhg Temporary Mods
)
-
Performance Analysis
-
j
,
Technical Reviews And DPU Support ll
-
'
j Betterment Projects
-
.
1
e
.
-
-
---
- - -- - - - --- - - -- ---
-
- - - -
-
-._
T'
-@'
T:
.
BENEFITS TO BE GAINED
-
.
!
'
Improved System Performance Due To Sense of l
-
l Ownership And Accountability By System Specialists
l More And Better Root Cause Evaluations Of in-House
-
And Industry Experiences Applicable To Pilgrim
l Operations Section Acquires Dedicated Technical Resources
-
l Maintenance Section Gains Significant Additional On-Site
-
Technical Support
.
'
l
'
Specified Regulatory Programs Get Additional Management i
i
-
Attention By Dedicated, Fulltime Personnel
.
,
Support Of On-Site Computer Systems is Centralized
-
Within Technical Section.
.
__
-_
_ ____
__.
.-
__ _ _
_
__
_
..
.__
Q'
-}
'} '
'
,
STATUS
,
Technical Section Reorganization Authorized 9/86
.
Position Descriptions For New Jobs Approved 10/86
-
i
.
]
Positions Posted 10/86
.
!
7 Steam Ops Computer Personnel Transferred 11/86
'
-
l To NOD Tech Section
,
"
i Candidate For Systems Group Leader Recommended 11/86
.
i l
'
-
.
l FUTURE PLANS i
Complete Screening Of Resumes For System 12/86 (Target)
.
Specialists And Begin Interviews
,
,
i Complete Other Transfers Of Tech Section 1/87 (Target)
.
Personnel
'
Systems Group Operational 2/87 (Target)
-
l l
O'
'
'. ' ',
.
..
,
,
i
)
THE WORK CONTROL SYSTEM PROVIDES THE
l MANAGEMENT CONTROL OF THE MAINTENANCE ACTIONS
-
-
.
i
)
)
Maintenance Request Status
-
i
.
'
Maintenance Planning
-
i
'
Scheduling integration
-
-
'
i
.
.
_ _ -
. _ _ _.
_.
.
O-c.
-
..
-
!
i TOTAL MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE INCLUDES MANY CONSIDERATIONS
!
-
i
Task Priority
-
!
l Plant / System Conditions l
--
!
-
Fundamental Resources
-
Coordination & Availability of Support Activities
-
-
.
'
.
l
!
Related Tasks & Work Activities
-
.
l
1
.
. _ _
_.
-
--
- _ ----
_
.
Q-
.
- ~)
-
,
,
.
-
,
- .
i
!
!
-
l THE CONDUCT OF MAINTENANCE SUPPORTS PLANT OPERATION IN A SAFE AND EFFICIENT MANNER
,
i
!.
Activity identification & Correction
.
,
i
-
'
!
Work is Properly Authorized & Controlled
-
.
Adherence To Station Policies & Procedures
-
.
,
!
.
Minimize Radiation Exposure
-
.
.
--
- -
__
- _ _ _ _ - _. _
_ _ _ _ _.
_.
.
. _.
_
_
.
l-
.
,
_
,
i MAINTENANCE GROUP L
'
CHIEFMAINTENANCE ENGINEER (C M E )
i R.E. SHERRY
.
ASSISTANTTO C M E C.MEDIROS -
,
i STAFF ENGINEERS CLERK (2)
MECH (OPEN)
ELECT (OPEN)
CHIEFMAINTENANCE ENGINEER
'
P.J. MORAlTES
.J.A.C (OPEN)
CLERK
-
-
!
-
i INSTRUMM ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL PLANNING
& CONTROL
-
!
ENGi m ENGINEER ENGINEER
!
.
ENGINEER
\\
.
M.R. MAGUlRE G.LAFCN)
J. VENDER PS & CC --# J.R. GAEDTKE
.
<
r i
2 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 3 SUPERVISORS l
(E,l/C,M)
j B.COBB P.GINNETTY (OPEN)
,
(OPEN)
R.McCUE E.SPAKOSKI D.ON M.MM R.L M H.S. SHIDNER (OPEN)
(OPEN) -
J.SACCOACH
,
i 14 ELECTRICIANS 22 NCT's 27 MECHANICS
__ - -.
t
.
.
i
.
. - - -
.'*
%
.
q
,')
q?'
'
..
MAINTENANCE GROUP CHIEF MAINTENANCE ENGNEER (C M E)
R. E. SHERRY
.
.
ASSISTANTTO C M E C.MEDIROS
.
STAFFENGINEERS CLERK (2)
ADDITIONA ASSISTANT STAFF ELECT (OPEN)
CHIEFMAINTENANCE ENGINEER P.J. MORAITES I & C (OPEN)
CLERK
-
%
NSTRUMENT MANTENANCE ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL g
PLANNING ENGNEER NEER ENGNEER ENGINEER M.R. MAGUIRE G.LARJND J. VENDER J.R.GAEDTKE
,
PS & CC -->
,
2 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 3 SUPERVISORS ADDITIONAL (E,l/C*M)
D.COBB P.GINNETTY PLANNERS (OPEN)
(OPEN)
R.McCUE E.SPAKOSKI D.OLEARY RR REARDON R.LYONS H.S. SHIDNER (OPEN)
(OPEN)
J.SACCO/CH 14 ELECTRICIANS 22 NCT's 27 MECHANICS
...w,_.,._....
.....,n.,,
.,,,,.,
., _,
,
.
h
ADDITIONAL SUPERVISORS AND LABOR FORCE
-
-
. - _ _
.
--
..
-.
__
_-
.-
.
..
- - - - - _
.
.
o-
c-
.
,
_
OPEN MAINTENANCE GROUP BACKLOG MR'S
OPEN BACKLOG MR'S AS OF 9/1/86 =
1891
-
BACKLOG MR'S COMPLETED 9/1/86 TO 11/19/86 =
288 i
B CKLOG MR'S OPEN AS OF 11/19/86 =
1603 l
OF THE 1603 :
l
.
OUTAGE MR'S =
-491 1112
,
-15
{
!
1097
!
TEST MR'S =
-58
'
1039
'
.
'
.
-249 l
MISC - CMG,ETC. MR'S =
.
.
i 790
.
.
l
.
. _ _
-
.i
.;.
c-
-
,
THE BACKLOG TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS WILL BE DISPOSITIONED PRIOR TO STARTUP
.
i i
!
Maintenance
\\
'
l l
Technical
.
i
)
Operations
l
)
l Construction
,
.
.
!
'ther
j
.
.
i
!
'
..
.
I
"%
g..
.
!
.
p
.
'
Z
'
w 8e>
E
$
-
e
.
'
OM4
$
'
-
'
p C
.M
-
rm
- .
'
.,.
_
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
-
-
.
- '-
.
G)
T:
,
.
.
l
?
!
OBJECTIVES i
I
.
Improve the overall physical protection
!
program at Pilgrim Station through :
i complete reanalysis of regulatory requirements
.
upgrade of program documents
.
,
!
l upgrade of hardware
-
l
,
strengthening of management controls
.-
-
l l
l i
OB-1 l
i
..
-
__
_
.
!
i l
'
BENEFITS j
l
-
\\
l Increased awareness, visibility, emphasis
-
j and sensitivity to security requirements
!
e Simplification of program documents l
i to facilitate revisions and reviews
!
i Enhanced Security Force performance
-
with state-of-the-art hardware
.
,
.
BE-1 I
.
l a,
Q-7:
.
i i
!
OUTLINE
!
'
{
. Organization
.
!
. Regulatory. Requirements Analysis Hardware
-
-
Facilities
'
i
-
. Training
.
i
.
i Corrective Action Systems
.-
l
'
Management Controls
.
.
i
!
!
l OIr1
)
!
.
.
-
- -
-
-
--
-
g.
.
~.
,
,
d l
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES SECTION l
l l
-
!
-
!
!
!
!
Resource Protection Compliance Group Training Group
'
.
& Control Group
,
j
- Fire Protection
.
l
- Security
-
Industrial Safety i
- Medical
.
!
!
I j
0-1
!
I i
-
.
i
,
_
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES SECTION j
.
,
i
-
-
Tra..ning i
F. ire Protect. ion 5 Security l
Compliance Group Group Group Leader B
Group
>
Leader Leader
$
Leader I
um?
l
-
,
'
.
s
e 0-2
-
_
.
.
_.
-
.- __-
-
.
O'
'1
~ ~ ~
\\
'
..
.
l l
l REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS l
.
l l
PURPOSE: To ensure that regulatory requirements are met l
.
by existing programs and procedures.
!
l PRIMARY PRODUCT: Revision to MASP consistent with
!
format of NUREG 0908.
!
STATUS:. All 1b modules completed.
l
!
Preparing for working level
.
meeting with NRC.
R-1
.
-
_
-
- _
--
g-
- .-
l 7,
.
.
i i
l
+
b
1
-
i HARDWARE IMPROVEMENTS
'
.
!
l
!
Barri
's
-
i l
!
!
. Intrusion Detection
I
'
l Access Control
.
Lighting
.
.
.
H-1
.
..__
-
g-
.
-
j
'
.
.
i
!
.
OVERALL APPROACH
.
!.
-
Engineered improvements to provide
.
- .
{
State-of-the-art equipment
Increased design margin
-
Accommodation for changes in
physical arrangement of the Site
,
!
'
increased operational efficiency l
l
-
i (
.
H-2
.
.
.
.
- -
- -
.
._ -
-.
_
__
_ _ _
_
-
_ _ _.
_ _ _
.
g.
.
.
.
J l
!
l
.
-
SCHEDULE
)
.
l Detailed design change packages
-
.
-
.
!
Working-level meeting with NRC
-
.
!
,
.
Implementation schedule commitments
!
'
-
.
.
<
c i
'
l
-
H-8
.
_.
_ _
_
.
.
-
i
..
.
,
i
,
l FACILITIES
.
i
!
-
l
)
Private office location for BECo Security management
.
i i
Additional office / working / lunchroom space for
!
.
)
Security force
-
l Improving various posts (Bechtel Warehouse; Alternate
'
.
l Access Gate)
-
-
)
'
Long-term space needs
-
.
l
.
.
F-1
- - -
.
.
.
-
_.
,
}
_
,Q-
~:
~'
-
-
!
I i
!
'
e TRAI:SIS'G i
i
!
-
!
l Module to ensure Security takes responsive
.
l
_ corrective action with thorough follow-up -
11/86 Overview module for BECo Senior Management - 11/86 l
.
i j
-
Establish initial technical training module for
.
.
'
j the new BECo Security Management
.
!
l
.
.
T-1
._-
.
_
.
- __ _
- - -
O-
_-
)-
_
-
.
.
_
!
I
.
!
l l
.
i
-
l CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEMS l
!
-
I NOP 83A9-Corrective Action Program
'
.
Month 1y trends being established
.
,
.
i l
Initial trend analysis report (Jan.1987)
e
!
-
l
-
C-1 ll - - -
.
.
_ _ -.
.
- - -.
.
_
.
.o.
--
-
_
!
l MANAGEMENT CONTROLS l
i
-
l
!
i
~ Established separate group l
-
i i
_
Strengthening controls over contractor performance
'
-
.
Adding key BECo positions
-
i
'
!
Establishing performance objectives and criteria
-
.
!
<
l Continuing with inter-company comparisons
-
.
l l
l
'
.
M-1 i
._
.
_ _.
_
__
r
-
-. _
..
-
-
- -
.
i
i
l
'
i FUTURE PLA3B
!
!
-
!
Continual imp'rovement through a Structured
.
l Seif-assessment process.
'
-
.
Enhanced integration of Security organization
-
l I
irito overall Station operations I
-
l
'
Continued reduction in dependency on
-
,
contractor Support
,
'
...
.
.
.
.. _
- _
.
-.
-
.-
.-
..
.
_
.@-
. :
^~
-
\\
)
i
.
NMSS BACKLOG
i
-
'
Status l
Backlog identified and quantified
'
j
. Contractor selected and P.O. issued Plans
.
.
Contractor support at full strength by
-
{
December 1,1986 i
,
i Disposition schedule established
-
.
.
I
{
BL-1
!
I.
-
-
@'
. '.
~
'[' '
-
.
.
-
!
!
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM i
l j
-
l UPDATE
!
i i
!
i
.
.
.
.
,
'
.
R.N. Swanson
!
Nuclear Engineering Manager
i
!
November 24, 1986
.
i l
l i
.
.
.
.
- - -.
-_
_
_
..
0'
.?
l
.
l l
i THE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM OUTAGE GOAL l
RESPONDS TO THE DRAFT NRC POLICY
'
i
-
.
J Respond And Implement Containment improvements l
Responsive To Draft NRC Policy Prior To Startup.
Revise Procedures And_ Train Operators To improve j
Operational Readiness For Beyond-Design-Basis a
.
!
Events.
-
l
,'
.
.
L
,
e
!
l
!
I
.
..
-_
-
___
.
-
>
.
!
PROPOSED NRC " SEVERE ACCIDENT l
CONTAINMENT" POLICY FOR BWR'S
~
l l
Hydrogea Centrol
-
i
- Prevent Containment Failures in Expected j
Accident Sequences including Station Blackout Reliable Containment Drywell Sprays
i
- Operable For Broad Spectrum Of Accident j
Sequences including Station Blackout Reliable Containment We.twell Venting
- Operable At Design Pressure Conditions To Prevent Containment Overpressure Failure And To Maximize
-
Use Of Suppression Pool As Filtering Medium
'
Core Debris Barriers
'
- Evaluate Paths For Core Debris Travel
- Add Barriers if Needed To Protect Suppression Pool j
,
Emergency Procedures And Training
- Review And Modify As Necessary To Ensure Operators Are
Able To Recognize Severe Accident Conditions
~
.
And Use Plant Equipment To Best Advantage
.
- - -
.
.
...
.
.
_
.
__
O'
.T.
. ' '
-
-
l
'
f.
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM STATUS - 11/24/86
.
L issue improvements Comments E
Hydrogen Control No Major Change Consider More Restrictive Deinerting Limits Prior To Startup
.
Containment Spray Firewater Intertie To Valve Control Alternatives Containment Spray in Station Blackout
.
Optimize Drywell Conditions Under Study
.
Spray Rate Containment Venting 8" Hard Pipe Vent Strict Operational l
From Wetwell To Guidance For Use To
'
l Main Stack Be Provided
'
.
Core Debris Barriers No Design Changes Focus On Drywell Sprays
.
.
-
w
- -
-
.
.
.__
_
_
_
l Q-7:
~~
.
..
!
l I
~
i SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM STATUS - 11/24/86
!
.
issue
!mprovements Comments
1
.
!
i Emergency Selected Revision To Review Procedures Procedures Current EOPs Against ATWS Analysis
& Training
Revise Procedures Draft EOPs Based On l
For Station Blackout Rev 4 EPGs
!
Train Operators
'
.
Other Third Diesel Generator To Complete Root Cause ;
i improvements Supply Emergency Buses Analysis / Upgrade l
Reliability Of
!
Complete ATWS Recirc Pump Trip B'reaker l
Rule Modifications
!
.
.
-
- - -
-