ML20207K453

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Mgt Meeting Rept 50-293/86-41 on 861124.Concerns Re Slow Response to Findings & Weaknesses in Areas,Including Control of Worker Overtime,Fire Protection & Security Noted. Partial List of Startup Issues Encl
ML20207K453
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 12/31/1986
From: Kane W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Lydon J
BOSTON EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20207K456 List:
References
NUDOCS 8701090424
Download: ML20207K453 (7)


See also: IR 05000293/1986041

Text

!

.

.

DEC 311988

Docket No. 50-293

Boston Edison Company M/C Nuclear

ATTN: Mr. James M. Lydon

Chief Operating Officer

800 Boylston Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02199

Gentlemen:

I

Subject: Management Meeting 50-293/86-41

We appreciated the opportunity to discuss your plans for program improvements

at Pilgrim and the status of current outage activities at the management

meeting on November 24, 1986. Our meeting report is attached.

We believe that the program changes you discussed, including the establishment

of an on-site systems engineering group and management structure changes, have

the potential to significantly improve your future performance. However, we are

concerned by the slow response to some NRC findings and weaknesses in areas

which were previously identified in our inspections and criticized during the

1985 Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP). These areas include

control of worker overtime, and the fire protection, security, and radiological

protection programs. As we indicated in our letter dated November 6, 1986, we

also do not believe that you are taking prompt action to resolve our concerns

in the surveillance test prngram.

In addition, the number of licensed reactor

operators on shift is low and continues to decrease.

The NRC is looking for strong evidence of progress at Pilgrim prior to restart.

Current performance is still weak in several areas and needs significant im-

provement. We have summarized many of the issues we plan to review prior to

startup in Attachment 1 to this letter. The list is not all inclusive and we

expect that we will add more issues to it. We anticipate that you will factor

these issues into your restart plans. Our Senior Resident Inspector will dis-

cuss and further clarify these issues if you so desire.

Further, you should

,

note that we plan to complete a SALP review prior to reaching a position

regarding the restart of the Pilgrim facility.

Evaluation of your progress

in resolving the issues listed in Attachment I will be an integral part of

this SALP.

Consequently, please inform us in writing of your schedule for completion of

your corrr.ctive actions to address the items in Attachment 1.

Further, please

advise us periodically of the status of your actions.on these items as well as

on the status of other startup issues that are subsequently identified.

The esponses described in this letter are not subject to the clearance

precedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

l

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

MNGMT MTG PIL 86-41 - 0001.0.0

'

l

12/31/86 I g o l

10gg g

7

PDR

i L$

f

.

.

Boston Edison Company M/C Nuclear

2

.s

Your cooperation is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Driginal Sisuaa;p

William Kane, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

1.

Attachment 1 - Partial List of Startup Issues

2.

Attachment 2 - Management Meeting No. 50-293/86-41

cc w/ enc 1:

L. Oxsen, Vic.e President, Nuclear Operations

A. Pedersen, Station Manager

Paul Levy, Cnairman, Department of Public Utilities

Edward R. MacCormack, Senior Regulatory Affairs and Program Engineer

Chairman, Board of Selectmen

Plymouth Civil Defense Director

J. D. Keyes

The Honorable E. J. Markey

Senator Edward P. Kirby

The Honorable Peter V. Forman

Sharon Pollard

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room )LPOR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

Commonwealth of Massachusetts (2)

bcc w/ encl:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o enc 1)

Section Chief, DRP

W. Raymw:d, SRI, Vermont Yankee

T. Shediosky, SRI, Millstone 1&2

H. Eichenholz, SRI, Yankee

P. Leech, LPM, NRR

PA0 (2) SALP Reports Only

Robert J. Bores, DRSS

DRP

RI:DRP

RI:DRP

R:F:

$ McBride

iggins

Blough

Ka

12/f8/86

2/\\y86

/

12/)l/86

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

MNGMT MTG PIL 86-41 - 0001.1.0

12/18/86

.-

.i

<

.

ATTACHMENT 1

Startup Issues

The following is a partial list of startup issues at Pilgrim as of November

24, 1986. Items are grouped according to SALP functional area.

1.

OPERATIONS

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Low Number of Licensed Operators

1985 SALP,

86-06

Lack of Staff Support for Operations

1985 SALP,

Department

86-06

Worker Overtime _ Control

1985 SALP,

85-26,

85-25, 86-37

Unreadable Station Drawings

86-37

2.

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS

'

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Continuing Weakness in Followup to

86-07,

Problems

86-21,

86-29

3

Worker Attitude Towards Radiation

86-06

Protection and Accountability

,

Implementation and QC of New

86-09

Environmental TLD Program

.

Communication between the Health

86-06

. Physics Group and Other Licensee

86-19

Departments

,

d

e

. .

.

.

. . .

.

. -

. - .

.

. . .

.

f

.

.

3.

MAINTENANCE AND MODIFICATIONS

A. Programmatic Con ~cerns

Reference

Maintenance Supervisory Staffing

86-06

Vacancies

Limited Maintenance - Operations

86-29

Interface

Implementation of Maintenance

1985 SALP,

Planning Group (Backlog Disposition)

86-27

Formalization and Implementation

1985 SALP,

of Preventative Maintenance

85-28,

Program

85-30

B. Hardware

ATWS Recirculation MG Set

83-09, 85-03,

Field Breaker Failures

85-14, 86-21,

86-24

Breaker Setting and Coordination

86-14

Implications of the Loss of Safety

Bus B-10

Minimum Flow Protection for

86-14,

Residual Heat Removal Pumps

86-25

Cracked Welds and Loose Bolts

85-28,

in Low-Pressure ECCS Systems

86-29,

86-34

Core Spray Check Valve and MOV

86-29,

Problems

86-29,

86-34

Heat Damage to Primary

86-29

Containment Isolation System

Cabling

Secondary Containment Damper

85-21,

Failures

86-25

.

.

Reference

Salt Service Water Piping Corrosion

86-34

Potential Corrosion of Primary

86-25

Containment Isolation Valves

Design Deficiency in Intermediate

86-25

Range Neutron Monitor Power Supply

Residual Heat Removal and Core Spray

86-21,

Pump Inspection Results

86-25, 86-34

Design Deficiency in the Standby

86-21, 86-37

,

Gas Treatment System

Potential Concrete Wall Issue

86-31

Design Deficiency in the High

85-18,

Pressure Coolant Injection

85-30

Turbine Exhaust System

Loose Wiring

86-14

.

Use of Fuses and Metal Links in

86-01,

Control Circuits

86-21,

86-25

Seismic Qualification of HCA Relays

86-37

4.

SURVEILLANCE

-

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Surveillance Scheduling Weaknesses

85-03,

86-21,

86-34

ECCS Test Adequacy

86-21,

Calibration and Testing of

86-25,

Protective Relays and Breakers

86-29

Control of Measuring and Test

86-14

Equipment

Local Leak Rate Test Program

None

Administration

B. Hardware Issues

Recurring Local Leak Rate Test

86-21

Failures

86-25

-

.

_.

,.

.--

- -

,

..

. - - .

..

.

5.

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Emergency Action Level Review

86-33

6.

SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Continuing Weaknesses in

85-32,

Following Up on Problems

86-34,

86-37

Prioritization of Security

86-08, 86-28

Maintenance

86-42

Termination of the Use of

86-08, 86-28

Long Term Compensatory Measures

86-42

7.

FIRE PROTECTION

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

.

Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills

86-21,

and Training

86-25, 86-36,

86-37, 86-38

Inadequate use of Corrective Action

86-25, 86-36

Program

Prioritization of Fire Protection

86-06, 86-36,

Maintenance

86-14,

6

l

86-38

l

B. Hardware Issues

Identification of Fire Barriers

83-06,

and Resolution of Penetration

86-21, 86-34,

Discrepancies

86-34

8.

QUALITY ASSURANCE

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Weakness in Responding to QA Findings

1985 SALP,

86-14

i

, _ . _ _ -

_ _ . _ _

-

.

.

.

.

-

. . . . -

9.

REFUELING AND OUTAGE MANAGEMENT

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Housekeeping Control

1985 SALP

B. Hardware Issues

Resolution of Inservice Inspection

86-34

NDE Indications on Safety Related

Piping and Loose Piping Supports

10. LICENSING

'

A. Programmatic Concerns

Reference

Technical Specification Changes to

1985 SALP,

Support Plant Startup

86-25,

86-29

!

1

J

!

i