IR 05000293/1986032

Mgt Meeting Rept 50-293/86-32 on 860909.Major Items Discussed:Status of Licensee Mgt Sys Improvements,Salp Improvement Status & Mark I Containment Enhancement. Viewgraphs Encl

ML20215C334
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	09/25/1986
From:	Lyash J, Strosnider J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20215C316	List: IR 05000293/1986032 ML20215C314
References
50-293-86-32-MM, NUDOCS 8610100240
Download: ML20215C334 (49)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:e ' e Y U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Meeting No.

50-293/86-32 Docket No.

50-293 License No.

DPR-35 Licensee: Boston Edison Company M/C Nuclear 800 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts Facility Name: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Meeting At: Boston Edison's Chiltonville Training Facility Meeting Conducted- -S te er 9, 1986 Prepared by: '24. c J<M

5 f . Lyash, Resident Inspector Date Approved by: 9 J!#

. Strosnider, Chief, Projects Section Date IB, DRP Meeting Summary: A management meeting was held at Boston Edison Company's Chiltonville Training Facility on September 9,1986 to discuss plant status, the status of licensee management systems improvements, SALP improvement status, Mark I Containment enhancement and a number of other issues.

The meeting lasted about four hours. Members of the state legislature and the State Department of Public Utilities attended the meeting.

< 10100240 860929 R ADOCK 05000293 G PDR

L .- __.

. m

e i DETAILS 1.0 Purpose The management conference was held at the request of NRC Region I.

The licensee was asked to discuss program improvements and other topics of interest at the plant.

2.0 Meeting Summary Dr. T. Murley, NRC Region I Administrator, opened the meeting with a brief discussion of recent regulatory actions, areas of ongoing concern, and NRC expectations regarding Boston Edison Company's improvement programs and conditions for plant restart. Mr. S. J. Sweeney, President and Chief Executive Officer, opened for Boston Edison by briefly describing the status of program improvements and outage plans.

Mr. A. L. Oxsen, Vice President of Nuclear Operations, then introduced Boston Edison's presentation. Copies of written material distributed by Boston Edison have been included as attachment 2 to this report.

a.

Refueling Outage Tasks Current and planned outage tasks were discussed. Those items constituting the preliminary outage critical path were summarized.

Ongoing inspection of the residual heat removal and core spray pumps, plans for completion of appendix R modifications and the licensee's plant decontamination program were reviewed in some detail. Primary containment enhancements to be implemented during this outage had not yet been factored into the outage schedule.

b.

Startup Checklist Development Development of the licensee's startup checklist was reviewed.

General categories of information and issues to be addressed prior to startup were presented by Boston Edison. NRC management stressed that the checklist should identify all pertinent issues, and should , be sufficiently detailed to assure that issues are fully resolved.

Boston Edison stated that detailed startup and power escalation plans, including suitable NRC evaluation and approval hold points, will be developed.

c.

Containment Enhancements Status The licensee discussed possible primary coatainment enhancements and their implementation schedule.

Preliminary plans include improve-ments to drywell spray and containment venting capability. Additional improvements are under evaluation, including the installation of a third emergency diesel genetstor at the site. NRC management compli-mented the licensee's approach to the station blackout problem, l 't

. e

focusing on prevention of a blackout rather than compensatory mea-sures. The licensee stated that those modifications addressing dry-well spray and containment venting capability will be completed prior to restart. Training of the operations staff in use of revised emergency operating procedures, and in the capability to control degraded conditions beyond the design basis event will also be completed. The need for careful and complete consideration of any changes made was stressed by NRC management.

d.

Management Performance Indicators The licensee briefly described the program in place to track the status of selected performance indicators. This program wil.1 consider INPO, NRC and industry standards in measuring overall performance.

e.

Operational Staffing Status The present licensed operator staffing situation, plans for increasing the number of licensed individuals, requalification training and simulator status were reviewed. The present shortage of operator licenses may continue until June 1988. The licensee stated that management SR0s may be used to supplement the R0 complement. Regional management pointed out that the removal of key management individuals to alleviate the R0 shortage could weaken the organization in other areas, and that this should be carefully considered. The need for forward looking plans to ensure that a strong operator pipeline is established was also stressed by the NRC.

f.

Six Week Management Improvement Process The results of the licensee's six week internal management assessment were discussed. The changes and improvements made to the work control system were outlined. The licensee stated that not all work items had been captured and factored into the improved work control system.

This effort is expected to be complete by the end of October.

Full-time planners have been assigned to each section to support this effort. Regional management stated that completion of this planning effort would be an important step.

g.

SALP Improvement Status Management improvements directed at SALP-identified weaknesses were discussed.

The development of better communications and personnel accountability were cited by the licensee as important steps.

Planned additions to the station personnel complement were outlined.

Emergency Preparedness reorganization, staffing increases and drill / exercise plans were discussed.

i L _ ___

o -#

h.

Other Topics Other discussion topics included: 1) the recurring failure of the-recirculation MG set field breakers, 2) surveillance test scheduling problems, 3) involvement of the safety review committee in assessing readiness for restart, 4) Appendix R modification status, 5) diesel generator differential relays and 6) residual heat removal (RHR) system leakage.

The recurring failure of the recirculation MG set field breaker to trip on demand, and its impact on the anticipated transient without scram function was discussed. The licensee stated that General Electric had been contracted to perform a root cause analysis, and that corrective measures including alternate designs were being evaluated.

It was also stated that satisfactory resolution of this issue would be reached prior to restart.

Regional management strongly stressed the need for thorough investigation and strong action to prevent future problems. The Regional Administrator indicated that the final resolution would be closely reviewed.

Recent surveillance test scheduling problems were discussed. A licensee evaluation will be performed to identify all once per cycle tests and determine the correct test requirement.

Modifications and maintenance performed to address the RHR system in-leakage problem were briefly reviewed. The licensee stated that at least two of the system injection valves, i.e., the M0-1001-29A and B valves, will be replaced during this outage.

The licensee outlined plans for performance on an independent restart readiness review by the corporate safety review committee.

This review will cover the spectrum of issues impacting startup.

3.0 Concluding Statements Dr. Murley closed the meeting by indicating that Boston Edison appears to be taking positive steps to improve performance. The effectiveness of these measures will be closely monitored by the NRC.

Progress of the licensee's effort to identify all outstanding work items and issues will be reviewed during the next management meeting, w

o e ATTACHMENT I TO MEETING REPORT 50-293/86-32 MEETING ATTENDEES U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission T. Murley Regional Administrator W. Kane Director Division of Reactor Projects H. Kister Chief, Reactor Projects Branch #1 J. Strosnider Chief, Reactor Projects Section IB M. McBride Senior Resident Inspector, Pilgrim J. Lyash Resident Inspector, Pilgrim P. Leech Project Manager, NRR Boston Edison Company (BECo) S. Sweeney President and CEO J. Lydon Chief Operating Officer E. howard Vice President - Engineering & QA A. Oxsen Vice President - Nuclear Operations A. Pederson Plant Manager K. Roberts Director of Outage Management R. Swanson Nuclear Engineering Manager S. Hudson Operations Section Head C. Gustin Vice President - Corporate Relations J. Ashkar ' Assistant to the President W. Frigard Senior Counsel W. Stone-Assistant General Counsel H. Brannan Quality Assurance Manager R. Silva Emergency Preparedness Coordinator.

L. Mcdonald Planning and Scheduling R. Tis Public Information M. Monahan Public Information P. Hamilton Compliance Other Attendees Senator Edward P. Kirby Representative P. V. Forman C. Barnett Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities P. Garrity Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities S. Hanley Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities s__

r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . e s . . ' 9/1/86 10/1/86 12/1/86 2/15/87 3/25/87 4/25/87 START Ui) VESSELREASSENELY APPENDIX TT CUTOVERS g ' B ' CORE SPRAY i

FLOW EVALUATION i i i I

i . .

• A * D/G APP. R CUTOVER i

i . i i

i

. . . . i ' B ' D/G APP. R CUTOVER j g33g j j !

INSPECTIONS

VESSEL

S/U CHECKUST lNN RECEIVE.CHANkEL & INSPECT NEW FUEL AND u SYSTEM

[SU

LEAKAGE i EN . . .:

HYDROSTATIC

. - -

EFUELFLOOR

5 CRD'S LPRM. 5 TEST

i PREPARATIONS

i

DRYTUBES

S/U PPESSUREE - -. VESSEL

. i.

i i i . DINSNCT

. OISASSEMBLg i INSTALL & TEST i NEWREFUEL

- -

pip

liOWPRESSURE _ j p' l'"' CABLE! !ILRTj jSYSTEp BRIDGE

i i.

BLADES

. MJDE

. . .. . i i H 2 ELP8M i i SWITCH i i iCAQLE

5 TESTING i I . ,.... .

i RFO#7 MODEi i .

CLOSEOUTS & i

TURNOVERS % PHYSICS -

TtSTiNG

, . SLOW ESCALATION TOeOwER . P_RELIMINARY ORITI_ CAL PATH P_R_01E_0_TLON F_OR RF_07+ .

. . . , . - . l - .

i .l l . s

i R@lVIIPIREIBIEKSILVE_IP_1LAFT :DECROFTAMIIEAE@F :ELAK i . OBJECTIVE - i l l l CONTUSUED Personnel Entry In Street Clothes, Into l All Critical Safeguards Areas And Operating Areas Not Designated As Contaminated Areas.

. l l

---

_ - _ --- --

- - - _ - - - - -

---

_ --- -_ _ _ ._ - - , . .. - ,

! I!1NIIPHIEEIDEIID_ ACCESS _I[S_A_PHAd_@IR C_@NiMRIIIBFEUR _ T_@ @VEIRALIIa_IEEIRF@IRMANCE_IIIVIIEIR@VEMENI? _ , . .

• SAFER OPERATION
• MORE RELIABLE OPERATION

' IMPROVED MANAGEMENT CONTROL

• CREATES A FAVORABLE IMPRESSION AND ENVIRONMENT

. I

, - _ _ _ . - . . ,. . . . PLAN BllE8 NSl@NS . ' . -

• Team Approach With Clear Responsibilities And Authorities-

! Incorporates INPO Good Practices - - ' l Continuous Identification And Correction Of Contamination

l Sources Effectiveness Reports To Executive Management And All

Station Personnel l . Training Program Philosophy And Requirements,

Decon And Containment Techniques < . i l } -.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __ -- _ _ . . , .. - . ERCGK JM[KMmW1M11@H . , , Select Contractor With Proven Technical-Expertise l-

Authorized And Hiring 4 Management Persons

To Learn Techniques From Contractor Authorized And Hiring 30 Persons That Will Permit

. l Continued Implementation by BECo.

l

' i

,

. . . ., , . e . ! SSIIE_03PMHP CEDf8_CEILHST WI3&_ ADDRESS _ AIL ::PACE 7E C - _ E FHDLEAE_ELAFT @EERASP:::@F AMD RilAEAGEPflERU @ _

.

! i . i ' ' )

• Safety Issues - BECo, NRC And INPO
• Management Performance Indicator Program And Management Readiness Assessment

Station Hardware And Software Operational Readiness

, l NRC/INPO Compliance Status Review

l (Commitment Backlog) . .

- - . , . l '

! I ' _TIBIE_S_TAIRTKJIP CHDECM4ET WIILL_AIDID:RESS_ALL_IFACETS _@:F NUCLEAIR_IP_LAN" @lERIRATIL@JC AhTD MANAGEMBE? .

• Station Physical And Radiological Cleanliness

l

• Fitness For Duty
• Emergency Preparedness

, !

• Controlled Escalation To Power Operation With Special Tests

. I

. - , . .. l . IYIASTEIR_IPIREsSTAIR5ISTIP CIEIECM40TGLOBERTS) . <

REDEX . i i A. Plant Modifications (Swanson) l B. NRC Commitments Backlog (Mcdonald) i C. Plant Housekeeping (Pedersen)- ~. D. Overtime Contro1 Effectiveness (Oxsen) E. Management Readiness Assessment (Oxsen) F. Operating Procedure Update As Required (Hudson) fi G. SALP Issues (Pedersen) < ~ l H. Performance Indicator Program Approval (Oxsen, Howard) ' I. Plan For Excellence (Ashkar) l J. Technical Specification Changes (Keyes) i K. Operator Re-Training Prior to (Hudson) - , L. Emergency Planning (Silva) M. Plant Startup Program (Pedersen) N. INPO Open Items , ( (Mathis) .

. ' ) ' . . i . JB@STON 3]KIS@N'S G@AIS.

, OUTAGE Identify And Implement Containment Improvements Responsive GOAL: To Bernero's Draft Policy Prior To Startup. Revise Procedures And Train Operators To Improve Operational Readiness For Effective Severe Accident Management.

. . LONG Perform A Comprehensive Probabilistic Risk Assessment RANGE Supported By Deterministic Analyses of Severe Accidents GOAL: To Ensure That: 1. The Pilgrim Specific Response To Severe Accidents Is . Well Understood.

2. These Insights Are Effectively Used For Severe Accident l Risk Management Within Boston Edison.

3. These Insights Are Available In Support Of Emergency - Preparedness Plannin ;< . . . . EEIRNEIR@'S PIR@POSEID - SEVEIRE AC_CHIDEW C@WI%HNIVIEWi:%:LI:CY ':23 :BWIR's , ! Hydrogen Control

Reliable Containment Drywell Sprays ,, - e Reliable Containment Wetwell Venting j

• Core Debris Barriers
• Emergency Procedures And Training -

l . I

}

. . , . .. . $ _@ 3 5_l_O E 3 U E 124 M E R L O $_ U E ! J r 3 5 K E . HYDROGEN CONTROL . '

• No Need For Major Design Change

.

• Administrative Control To Limit The Amount Of Time Containment Is Deinerted Is Under Study
• Decision Will Be Made After Reliability Evaluation

' Of Nitrogen Inerting Function Is Completed , !

'

- - - . . .. ' . AC":::@NE ::P::aANICE:D AU ::P::::A:XMI !

I CORE DEBRIS BARRIERS I

• Core Debris Behavior Will Be Evaluated Using The IDCOR MAAP Code

l

• Based Upon Industry Studies To Date,

No Modifications Are Anticipated -- . ,

' - - ., .

. AC115NE3 l5[4AEE33 Af 2[7851 E i , ! - , , CONTAINMENT DRYWELL SPRAYS

I

• Fire Water System Will Be Interconnected to RHit System To Provide Additional Source Of Water For Drywell Spray
• Options To Provide For Control Of Essential Valves Under Station Blackout Conditions Are Being Evaluated
• Modifications To The Existing Spray Spargers Are Planned

' Based On Evaluation Of Severe Accident Events .

i

- - . .

/ , , . d_CI532125hMWU3 Ol? Kod32K

I . l l CONTAINMENT WETWELL VENTING

) i

• Capability For Venting Wetwell at Containment Design Pressure Using Supression Pool As Filtering Medium

Will Be Provided l

• Criteria And Guidance For Operational Use Of This Vent l

Will Be Prepared To Ensure That The Intended Risk ' Reduction Benefits Are Achieved .

• Options For Routing The Vent Discharge Are Under

! Evaluation. A Selection Will Be Made After Reliability ! And Risk Evaluations Are Available , I l l t . -.

. . . . . - _ _ _ _. . - - - . . . / . , . kCI_[_l_OES d_AM EE 3 d$~2lEU_8t3 1 E l L EMERGENCY PROCEDURES AND TRAINING , I

• Revise Procedures To Incorporate Plant Changes Made

This Outage - ! '

• Revise Procedures For Station Blackout Event i

j

• Review Procedures Against Current ATWS Event

! Analysis For Possible Improvements ! ' , i . Revise Procedures For Combustible Gas Control . Operators Will Be Trained In All Emergency . l -, e l

. -- _ --- - - - - - - - - _ . - . . ' ./ , .. . l $$ ?$ NS ? 8 NEh $N E $rX X

! OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ! ,

• Modifications Will Permit Fire Water To Be Supplied To l

The Reactor Thru The RHR Low Pressure Cooliint l Injection Valves Under Station Blackout Conditions .

• Capabilities To Backup The On-Site Fire Water Pumps

Using Fire Trucks Will Be Available. Pilgrim Now Has ! A Fire Truck At The Site.

! - j , Operators Will Be More Knowledgeable Of The

Plant Behavior And Capability To Control Degraded l Conditions Beyond Design-Basis Events As A Result Of Severe Accident Studies Being Done ,

• We Are Evaluating The Cost And Benefits OfInstalling i

l A Third Diesel Generator During This Outage

. - - . . . . . . . MAKARt:EEEEI? EEXF_EM::ARGE :::E:MCAt ?@::RE

.

INPO /NRC PROGRAMS INCORPORATED -

INDUSTRY GOALS-STANDARDS INDICATED

BECo GOALS INDICATED .. t

EXTENSIVE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION . m

a . WASTE VOLUMES SHIPPED BY TYPE -

LEGEND

l ] DE, m.

._._._._._._._._.-.-._._._._._.

I IBEAD RESIN ... :.__.

. _ _ _. -.. .____._._._._.

I powounno namin ' - - __.

_ _ _ _. _ _ _. ._.____.- __.-_.._ ___._.

I Ic-maw

, . _ . ___.".. _.i-._.-._._._._.

I I NC-oAinr ._.

. . _ g.

. ._.

. ___.

--_.-._._._._._.

- _ - _ _ - - - -. - - -. _ - - - - .. -. - - no.e.

_ _ _ .. _ _ ._ . _ _ _ _ . _.. _. _ _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _. _. .. -. _ _ __ ___ _______ _. ___ _. _ .. _._ _.__ . .. -_ .. __ _.

. _. _ _, .. _.._._._._.

.. \\ ' . . . . _.

. . . . p . rue van aan uAY..JUN JUL. AU. SEP 907 MOV 950 Jaw aan. sees runu onc. sees WASTE VOLUME 1986 CUBIC FEET / PERCENT

BEAD RESIN 4845 27.1N POWDERED RESIN 119.7N [ C-DAW R484 14.5N DE 1847 7.8K \\ l l uc_ DAW sero.s 4e.oM VOLUME YTD = 16,982.8 CU. FT.

avouer as, sese .

• * " -

-- ---w- - -.. -.. -. _.. _. _ _ _,,,. _ _ _ _. ,_

... - - _ _ _ _______ & . WASTE STATUS 198@ .

• ""

LEGEND MONT,HLY ALLOCATION Q agy, yog, asooo--- .--------------------- --- ---__________---___ _.

-

.. LE98it ...... ' ' soooo-------------- 1--- - 7' - - - - - - TOTAL vOL vro ._ .. .- .~ s ees MAXIMURS ' __ lI,oooo.

-.- ' . _ _ _. _. _. _. _r" ~ ps ' _ _ _. _. _. _. ,/ . , .-

,- .. ' ,oooo.-. _. _. _ *.-:_.___._.___._._.

. - ....- . 2,'.'.. _. _. _. _. _. _. _. _. _... oooo. -.

. f s p , - . my p p p p " o JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC JAN. 1988 THRU DEC.1988 WAS74~ PROXC7/ON

• " *

LEGEND , l l MONTHLY ALLOCATION Q ACT. VOL.

asooo------------------------------ _______________________ / LIMIT ...... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -, fj 2 - - - - soooo- . _ TOTAL VOL YTD ,, T .' 1905 MAXIMUM '

i$ _

-. _. _. _. _. _. _/: * /

. ' ' ' N,o00. /

- . B - * - - - f

. ,. ._._._._.

. _. _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _.._ I ,

. ,

. /..** . 3-ls*~------------------------ acoa- -- B.~ E g mn d P 1 Fil P. m 2_ F. In 7. I. ff o , JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC l JAN. 1986 THRU DEC. 1986 Volumes shown f or Sept.-Dec. are FORECAST volumes o n ly.

1 . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ - -. _ - . --. . .. - -- - _ _ _ -

.____________ _ ____ __ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ ______ __ __ . . .

e ~ LAST Cm7 Y Eb O n -- s '- m g _ , .v o.= s FROM:, l28 AUGUST'86l TO: l3 SEPTEMBER *8el PNPS HAS HAD [9 ROR's TOTA!j ,

1. OF ROR's PER CATEGORY O

4

8

CATEGORY rrE- - 1. CLOTHING CONTAMINATION g 2. SKIN CONTAMINATION u - - 3. CLEAN AREA CONTAMINATION

g-, _ _ . 4. " SPILLS" g 5. PORTAL MONITOR ALARMS ,' ' g 6. IMPROPER FRISKING E 7. FAILURE TO USE ENG. CONTROLS " 8. ALARA CONCERNS !

1. -

- 9. PROCEDURE VIOLATION / INADEQUACY 10.RWP VIOLATION / INADEQUACY L- , l 11.NOT OBTAIN/ ADHERE TO H.P. BRIEFING E ' 12.H.P. EQUIPMENT U

13 VANDALISM E 14. POOR HOUSEKEEPING

15. MISUSE OF RESP./ ISSUE SYTEM E (, 1) - 16. EATING DRINKING,ETC IN CONTROLLED AREA 17.DOCR CONTROL - 18. KEY CONTROL (2) 19.lMPROPER POSTING 20. POSTING /S.O.P. VIOLATION 21.lMPROPER STORAGE 22. DOSIMETRY LOST /NOT WORN 23. DOSIMETER OFFSCALE 24.OTHER , MAJOR - MINOR - iEl::===E .i '. SIGNIFICANT OCCURRENCES 1. A Watch Engineer and R.P. Tech found candy in an R.P. Control Point desk on 23' Reactor Building.

2. During the weekly audit on High Radiation Area doors, the door to the Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger Room was found open. The locle. had been defeated with tape.

I _ _ _. _

i , i i i

- s ,.1 - ' 'l s.:... v. -- - . --n..-...,-....>.-~~.~-- %., w * " "dg,, h ldl> g . _. _.. - _ ,, ' . ' ' N ' - - haai .; og . . I a ' . . , . _ o.. - 6 i * "---"f",' , ' ' ' ' - -

- - g ac Ercv

. m ~>U ~ l... _h - x k.

. . ir-m '< .aa s , "" - -- ' .,,,,,,y b, f g-h / i em u

% x,n a ..* .p.. y(... R.

\\., n,_,_, ' - h ' mem ue r , . .- / ..,l..;.,1,u . ,.. . L & mr - ' ......- . s ,,, , , - , . . gg.

ggg

P

• e *

- ,.. qi - -

l E- - ELt2

E!f

, - . i. t . v ,' N :$ h ya.

gi - .- - y'.;;, \\-- ,,,, . _ _ __ _.. i 40'E' ,

n i

- 3;;;;;y7 Q. a.. . .. - pu..ys,, e - ]m - - ,. . _ ,a.4 Ses..nsg.t .- . '... g,h_ O . ... ., e ram,_' . -i .a .. _.

.. . . - - -, %, - a,-.... , - - -, w - . . S.. eg. . . .l.

• -

., c.

., as we -. 4.y,,n;;y:q

. e-- , . . , r, . _a ., s- , .

-- 3 e,u,nggpg . x.

- ;. j . k :,-- 9s p,., g-3 - - , , m.e e . , , e - E1 - ,,~

,,,,,,b; 4G .. .,, _ , . . ::' + - , - - ?w.,. "..Q -

• I.

' . ..

;-

a - . .. 5.g&., . . ..: an , . . . . > _ - -j l . k W T 4"P . N -

---

re--.._

tN" ' I.

jY .' 4,pgjy

"" [_y et

i 9 '- ( ,,,p . , ,Q .J . ,- . ,,

. g-j oggs - - a . . .

. ca - v.r@.'. m..

._ ? TF' . ,, _ . $' , - . -. - . = - - - - ' AC.:- .a.

ne.

. . . - nn w _.n -ar.n f. b,y-gi . : + 29~.. 3+.._., a., ,,,,. - ' ,,L . . a r.

. .. . ew_ Ws1P6 .. ",,g gg ' ' - -- 7 fpuc% , = * - + - -

• -
• -

= * *"i t a ,. _ y ! snge . . . i.I ec"M MM' y .. - . . - l f #. ~ ~. ._ ' 1' -o s . . a _._ =

• -.

. _.

.= _g --g 1. y w .F%.

t -- - ._qg .. . m . f,. L _.. s . 51_. ~' _ ' ? :_^ - g.rpQ .g b &, ~

y . . f.

. . r, _ e - r - . . - -. -. >-c . . .

1 -. g .. _.- ,. ' . .:. . . _ .. __ .. - - - - _ - - __ ___,___

t;. : - !y !w5 .1 .n . ,-- ,w..a. me.e v - m- .. g ,, - m - . , f.we

. .... t 6_ uw - .

.

1 i y - i,- m- - - . _ , s

.

J _3 m, _ =n. vne 's a6. eg g_ ~,.am-1 w n u e<f -- - - . ;. n => n . m . . . _ + .. r ,1- ., e v_-- . .. . , . _ , e . -.

y ws%% %, . ' - -,%.h i U .!_ _.:. '.,. _ - . . . ' gM1.

I e, ' ' .. , . --. . . . . . ..,. b Tf *g g . ! pd n ye S - - 1% "TE J' *

E i E .. & un' sa m< - SH W . , , .

a n., n ie,.

4, ryi - - C m 'r"I Ib -

e.

.. _, - - - _ u. .--v--+ -- - _.

s1 I '

l. I j

l

' - .

ssa

, - . -- .:.3 . l-@, - . _

. , sancts e x<t. asn'-V ' .q . RDOR PMfGTE,tc!T-6' & 6'<f . -,-,,-m, - - - - -,, -,,,, -. - - - - , - - - -. . _ -.,, -, - - - ,, - - - - -.., _ - - - - - - - - - - - - --

I I .. . . I - i , - g .

' 849

d!rG G I4 @ mN < Q (SE b @ , . ' - I - -,.., ,. ~,,,, -, - - - -...,,. -,, - - - - - - - ,,,,,--,, -, -, - -

. -- - . . s, ., . . . . [1E_@NMalEl+WS_1@:Bi3_@lER_@ ! EKER T@ 85%BT UzP ' . '. - Annual Simulator Training In October,1986 In Morris, II.

- - Participate In On-Going Requal Program - Prior To S/U (February - March,1987) -

• 20 Hours Of Hands-On Training Per Shift On Our Plant Specific Simulator

'

• Emphasize Normal Plant S/U And Operating Transients

,

• Revised Emergency Operating Procedures

. - -

. , , . . ' .

_C_@ E 3 R @jL @:_7 :1@lEB_@ @VIKREK3

j - GoalIs 6 Shift Rotation , !

• Allows For 40 Hour Work

' . ~ i . Including Training And Vacation Coverage , - Negotiating With Union To Return 3 R.O.'s

To Operations ! l ' - Use Managenent SRO's As An Option ' To Maintain 12 "RO's" - Potential Shortage Of R.O.'s Until June 1988 ' Could Impact Goal Of 6 Shift Rotation .

__ ___________ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _____ _ _ _ _._________ - ___. __._ _

. . . . . SIMULATOR STATUS .

• BECo SIMULATOR BUILT BY CAE ELECTRONICS, MONTREAL, CANADA
• ACCEPTANCE TESTING PROGRAM AT CAE 8/25/86 -11/24/86
• BREAKDOWN, SHIPPING AND SETUP AT PNPS 11/25/86 - 1/9/87 s
• TESTING AT PNPS 1/12/87-2/27/87 3/2/87
• SIMULATOROPERATIONAL

- . e

. .. . ... . -- _._ ' . . . - -- __.

_ _ _ _ ___ ~ _ _

- 30 - l ' 25 =

20, , ., - . ' , c .

b

l . 'i 15 - k

13 k9 y ___ __ g_1E 9*$

12

&. s 1 0.- p9ig m- -

u) 7{4 .Ja

9 e

e-m: .m

~ S

s

! g ,t:; c.

e; .y - , , ,'$ D $ 1$ Nj <!$1 k 5= Ph, $.. -<! c54 p' At b f) ,,. o-) c.

. r, .. r 3I g hh n,k... , h _ b.

I . a

.

v.

g,.: ,.- ,.q - ,$j,- kip;r s {h, FIj g c.. l

" hi,;. fN m v - u:. .au .a a - JUN 86 AUG 86 NOV 86 APR 87 JUN 87 JUN 88 . .____

W , . g ' - W g g 'A ;

g

g 8Mg g

- 1Fl - l l Jl l

l ' " Dl . l ? . [ . t y N[ ,, l ' , , l ' Ol ,, l , l Sl , l "* M l Al " . l ' " ' l Jl Y l

l 9Jl o .. P t l E 1 o sx U L M[[ hc )m # 7 w [ U s T l a

D Al o

x e hs R ' i,I I ' s ci1 I I I n E E s ,' l '3 ' t t.

e a cw A H M ll RC i c C n N - T l e ( o .n S S l F_ l u w ee mm l G s

- aa l N Jl !

?[ I l ( l N ' l I Dl ' . IA l R l Nl ' T l fo Lh 6 o Oc O ll 8h t e - l / c h Oa s c 3 S Hw / t l a o Sl 2O Cn s w So / l R N l a

n E o 'R l Al T M U l RA

O l Jl T T

l S

_ l _ w:IO3 y,m f+ Wz37 OWOZ

n, 42 W naOP= .. - I 9Jl - i }

_ i _ l

Ml l q 'O _ /

R O l Al SR ) l l _ m o l a

o Mj x h _ _ E c l t l S n . C n o e _ l _ Fl R o C p h u l o J o rM l N o e c s o0 S n e ( h O r . l P e i Jl c " P ru M s S

l N O O " L o s U (R T l R * l l , - - ' , l i!jll

I

!l

l l,>!!lii)i!!Iilj

- - - _ -. . - . . . . . . I 6 WEEK ACCOMPLISHMENTS i ' Familiarization Of New Team = - ~. Completed Initial Self-assessment

Instituted Team Building Periodic Meetings

Improved Work Control System

) . Determined Measurable Performance

Indications For Areas Requiring

l Immediate Attention

j Selective Hardware Improvement = l ' Selective Programmatic Accomplishments

-. l , - - - - - - - -

- _ _ l_- - -

. l .. . ! . ! 6 WEEKS OBJECTIVES - i l

• Familiarity of New Team Members

, ~ j

• Determine How To Recognize and Address j

Current Weaknesses ~

• Determine How To Achieve And Maintain Excellence l
• Review Previous Goals And Objectives And Set j

Performance Indicators To Measure Future Progress '

• Accomplish Selective Programmatic And Hardware Improvements

. I e e

- . .__ ._ .. -. _ _ . _ _ - . . . . . . EXAMPLES OF HARDWARE IMPROVEMENTS , ,

, . ~.

• Diesel Generator Relays

,

Security . ,

• Fire Protection

' i i i I i ,

M - -

- -- - -- ! . . - !.

..

I I FUTURE ACTIONS \\- i . ! Continue To Resolve SALP And INPO Concerns '

Develop And Measure Additional Performance Indicators Toward

i " Strive For Excellence" I

' Visit SALP #1 Performers

Participate In INPO Evaluations To Observe Other Top

- Performers Continue Periodic Self-Assessment And Team Building Meetings

! i ! Strengthen Work Status Reporting System -

r - -- - -

.____ -. .. _ -

- . . i.

', . . i SALP ISSUES CONTINUALLY ! BEING ADDRESSED

' i ! ] Staffing & Overtime Control

Security Upgrade

I . l Fire Protection Upgrade

. i

Maintenance Effectiveness Operator Effectiveness

J ! Commitment Control

. Quality Involvement

. I l Corrective Action Program l(

Radiological /ALARA Control - , Training Program

Surveillance a .

... , RECENT PROGRESS

. ! ACCOUNTABILITY

OWNERSHIP OF TASKS.

i e COMMITMENT SCHEDULING ! DEFICIENCY REPORTS (DR'S) e l RESOLUTION !

WORK CONTROL SYSTEM

- .

COMMUNICATIONS e DAILY MEETINGS i ITEMS OF IMPORTANCE e e MONTHLY ALL HANDS MEETINGS l e TOP DOWN MEETINGS ' l ACTIONS e ELIMINATED OVERDUE DR'S l e SELF ASSESSMENT MEETINGS .

! e FULL TIME PLANNERS e PLANS AND SCHEDULES FOR ALL WORK

, ._.

~.. __ j,- ... i - l - i.

i.

l EXAMPLES OF PROGRAMMATIC l' ISSUES ADDRESSED i ! ' . . Staffing And Overtime Control

, Operator Effectiveness

i i Commitment Control

' Radiological /ALARA

, Planning And Scheduling

Vendor Manual Validation And Continual Update

Maintenance Request System Upgrade

.

i

- . .. , . i - .

J

, !

. i SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULING '

• Identify All Tests With Once/ Cycle Definition

. ~. i

• Determine Test Frequency

• Obtain NRR Concurrence On Appendix J.

(program vs. component)

, I

• Submit Proposed Technical Specification Change l

. . ._ __ ' . - . ,. i - .. ! . j i , ! ! ! ! _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- A - ( __ !

. .l . Added 5 in Nuclear Management Services Section !

! Added 30 In Maintenance Section

, . . Added 4 Supervisors in Maintenance Section

. !

. Adding 13 Engineers in Technical Section

.

___ _ _______ _ _. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _. ________ - __ - -______-_ - -__ ____ _ _ _ _._ _ . , . . .. .

. -

!

! ENDEEGENC1f_IP_PJEIPAREDNESS @RGANIEATIL@ NAIL @ HART ! l A.L.OXSEN ,i VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS j

.

l l ! C. C. FULLER R. E. SILVA ASST. EMERGENCY l EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS PREPAREDNESS - i COORDINATOR COORDINATOR , J.F. CROWDER EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS l DRILL & EXERCISE NUCLEAR TRAINING ADMINISfRATIVE l COORDINATE INSTRUCTOR ASSISTANT l ! - !, l

___ - _ _. .__ __ _ . _ _. - . . . , ' .,. ! -

-.

l -

IE@::RGANIEAi?:::@N @:F C?:E:E :EK:E::RG:ENCY

!

IES:P@NS:E I?:EAKS8

Note: NRC recommended reorganization to insure the E.O.F. as an outward

j looking facility.

) 0.S.C./T.S.C.

E.O.F.

-

l Accident Mitigation Environment & State ' Primary concern Interface Primary Concern

! l

• EmergencyDirector
• EmergencyCoortlinator

! = RadiologicalEmergency

• EnvironmentEmergency I

Team Coortlinator Team Coortlinator , I j = EmergencyPreparedness Coortlimitor

• CommunicationsLiaison

! (MDCA-Framington)

• RelocationPosition
• NewPosition

' .

. .. .. .. !

EPEE 3EEERY ZKEl%EEJREER

-

Jammaury H, H@@@ - Nemme

i j Primary Objective: Achieve a S.A.L.P. -1 Rating i

Enabling Objectives: Completed to Date: .

'

• VisitedotherS.A.LP.-1 Sites

!

l

• IncmasedPermanentStaffComplement

. ! fremito 5 i I i

• Relocatedtostate-of-the-artE.O.F

' ' = SuccessfullyconductedSemi-AnnualH.P.

DrillandRemedialRe-EntryDrill

_ _ _ ! ... j .

e e EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS l Major Upcoming Emergency Preparedness Issues . Siren Test

. . , Full scale exercise

, Local plan revisions

j i . . Pending legislation to increase E.P.Z.

_.

. -. .- -. -. _.

_.

- j.

... j .

) e i EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS ! ! l Future Goals:

l l ! l

• State-of-the-art Emergency Facilities, j

Organization, Equipment, Procedures i and Plans !

l ' Continue to maintain a S.A.L.P. - 1

j Rating .

i ! - i l

• FEMA 350 approval

- .i O ! i t

__.

. _ _.

_ - _ . . . l - '.. ..

EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS i !

• Conduct dress rehearsal of annual l

exercise ! J

• Conduct additional practice drills as re-i quired to ensure successful Exercise on 10/23 i

l

• Conduct annual excercise 10/23

• Evaluate relocation of AEOF
• Medical Drill - Fa111986

! - !

• Reorganizing / updating E.N.L.
• Increasing Emergency Organizational Depth

.

• Evaluate EPZ Town Requests and

' facilitate procurement of required items

i

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - -- _ - _ - . . _ - _ ..- o , , .. i '

Enabling Ojectives in Process: . i . . Assessment of all PNPS Emergency l Facilities ! - i Commissioned new Evacuation Time e Estimated (E.T.E.) and comprehensive traffic management plan - l ! Generated action items and assigned re-

sponsibilities as a result of Emergency Facility walk thrus . Installation of teleconferencing system

- at all emergency facilities f Conduct call out of assigned emergency

l personnel l - Conduct FEMA siren test

. .

- l_ .... ..

i EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS l l Developed and submitted Annual Exercise = Objectives j j Conducted training /get acquainted sessions

! for approximately 100 local and state ] officials - i I Reviewed and revised PNPS Emergency Plan,

Procedures and Emergency Notification List l Conducted E.O.F., T.S.C., O.S.C., Media

l Center and Recovery Center walk-thru , l drills Represented company at local town meet- - * ! ings and State Senate Meeting i ' Reorganized PNPS Emergency Response ~ l

i Organization. Initiated and completed the necessary corrective actions , . ,y - - -- }}