IR 05000285/1990003
| ML20006B728 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1990 |
| From: | Kelley D, Seidle W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20006B725 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-285-90-03, 50-285-90-3, NUDOCS 9002050296 | |
| Download: ML20006B728 (5) | |
Text
.
.
'
.
-
.
APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
REGION IV
HRC Inspection Report: 50-285/90-03 Operating License: DPR-40 j
Docket:
50-285 I
Licensee: Omaha Public Power District (OPPD)
444 South 16th Street Mall!
Omaha, Nebraska 68102-2247 Facility Name: FortCalhounStation(FCS)
Inspection At: FCS, Fort Calhoun, Nebraska
Inspection Conducted: January 8-12, 1990
C
/ /ev /90 Inspector:
2m D. L. KelleyJeactor Inspector, Test Programs Date
Section, Division of Reactor Safety-i Approved:
!
// W/90
^
W. C. Seidle, Chief, Test Programs Section Date
!
Division of Reactor Safety Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted January 8-12, 1990 (Report 50-285/90-03)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the surveillance testing
{
and calibration control progrems.
.i Results: Within the areas -inspected, no violations or deviations were-i identified. The testing control programs appeared well conceived and
'
implemented. The programs appeared to be working well as. evidenced by the '
reduction in missed and/or overdue surveillance tests..At the time of this
!
inspection, there were no overdue surveillance tests.
!
.;
'I j
'
9002050296 900129
{DR ADOCK0500{tg5
- \\
.
.j
'
,
,
,
i
_ _.
_ _ _
_ _.
_. - _ _.. _ - _ - - _ _. - _ _ - _ _ _ _.. _
_-
..
__
-
-
i
'
W
,t
... -
,
..
'
.
-
.
-2--
?
' DETAILS
- 1 1.
PERSONS CONTACTED OPPD
,
- K. J. Morris, Division Manager, Nuclear Operations.
- i"
- S. K.- Gambhir. Division Manager E Production. Engineering:
- C, F. Simmons Station Licensing Engineer
,
- J. R. Geschwender, Licensing Engineer
.
- T. C. Mathews' Station ~ Licensing Engineer.
. i,
.
- G. M. Cook, Acting Station. Licensing Supervisor
..
.
.
- G. P. Schwartz, Manager,' Electrical / Instrument and Control Design-Engineering =
,
,
- R. L. Phelps,- Manager, Design' Engineering, Nuclear:
- G. R. Peterson,. Manager; Fort Calhoun Station ~...
a J. W. Chase, Nuclear Licensing and' Industry Affairs Manager
- J. D.' Kecy, Supervisor, System Engineering.
- M. R. Gore, Supervisor,sMaintenance.
~
- J. W. Tills, Assistant Manager, Fort Calhoun Station-i
,
l
- K.. R. Henry, Lead System Engineer
.
- S. Gebers, Supervisor, Radiological Service
.
- R. Mueller, Supervisor, Nuclear Services
- L. T. Kusek, Manager,. Nuclear Safety Review -
- A. L. Rogado,. Nuclear Safety Review-Specialist
- S. F. Swearngen. Nuclear Safety Review Specialist e
- T. J. McIvor Manager, Nuclear Projects'.
- R. F. Mehaffey Supervisor, Electrical / Instrument and Control.
.
.
i C. Linden, Computerized History and'Haintenance Planning System Coordinator-
'
E. Jun, Surveillance Test Coordinator
~
NRC-
<
- P. H. Harrell, Senior Resident Inspector
- Denotes those attending the exit interview on January 12, 1990.-
-During the inspection, the inspector also contacted other. licensee. personnel.
l 2.- SURVEILLANCE-TESTING AND CALIBRATION CONTROL PROGRAMS (61725)_
.The purpose of this inspection was to ascertain the effectiveness of the t!
licensee's program for contro111ng' surveillance testing 1and calibration j-activities.
.,
The inspector concluded that the control program was effectively designed and appeared to be functioning well to schedule and to track-surveillance tests and
-
>
calibration activities.
.
The-assessment of the surveillance testing and calibration control programs-was accomplished by reviewing the procedures and by discussing the aspects of the
,
,
<
$ [
+a
_ - - _-.. _ _ _ _ -,
- ___
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
.
--
- a
.
,
-
.
,
'
..
-3-
.
program with.' licensee personnel. The documents that were reviewed are listed
in the attachment to.this report.
The major com)onent of the surveillance and calibration activities is the computer.ized.11 story and maintenance planning system-(CHAMPS). CHAMPS'is a-data base that contains equipment information. LThe data base had been verified
'
.by the licensee _to'be accurate. The licensee had performed.a review to
,
,
determine.the Technical Specification (TS) required: surveillance testing and
<
the nonTS required testing and calibration. This review included the inservice?
..
inspection and testing requirements of Section XI of the ASME code. The:
testing and calibration information was then loaded into CHAMPS with-data-on
"'
the testing and calibration periodicity and procedural' requirements.. From this4 s
information, repetitive tasks were generated. These repetitive tasks formed
,'
-the surveillance and preventive maintenance schedules. The schedule for TS g
testing and calibration requirements are controlled by the surveillance test s
^
program, and nonTS calibrations are controlled by the preventive maintenance'
t program.
>
,
Specific responsibilities and assignment's were delineated:in 1-
-'
Procedures S0 G-23, " Surveillance Test Program" and S0 M-2, " Preventive.
%
'
Maintenance Program."
'
'
'
t The scheduled tests, generated by CHAMPS, were distributed.to the assigned, j
responsible organizations for performance. The surveillanceitests were. tracked l
'
by the shift technical advisor (STA),- and the preventive maintenance-(PM) tests
'
"*
were tracked by the responsible group. The inspector reviewed the. January 1990 monthly surveillance testing schedcle and verified that all-tests required to be performed on each shift, each day (s,)and each week'were' identified with a test'
s procedure and the responsible group listed.
The inspector' discussed the scheduling efficiency with the resident inspectors--
,
and licensee personnel. The inspector was informed that the'use.of CHAMPS had resulted in more positive control of surveillance testing and.a marked. reduction in missed and overdue tests. At-the time of this inspection, there were no-overdue surveillance tests.
- The. responsibilities for completed, tests were specifically assigned by'the procedures which control the test programs. The procedures s)ecified that-
.."
completed tests were reviewed, completion ~ data entered into t1e tracking
.
system; and overdue or missed tests were flagged and corrective actions. assigned.'
Anomalies and deficiencies were reviewed and the applicable TS ;1imiting condition-
..for operation checked to ensure that they were _ not exceeded.
In addition, -the
?
shift supervisor was notified,'and a maintenance order was written to corrects j
any deficiencies.
An additional area examined by the inspector was. revision to the surveillance ;
test program resulting from the TS amendments. The inspector reviewed Amendments 119, 120, 121, and 122.. Amendment 121'to the.TS cc.tained changes
'
to the testing requirements for the containment spray nozzles.. Procedure 50 G-23
'
assigned the responsibility for ensuring testing requirement changes to the
!
. assistant manager, Fort Calhoun Station. A review of procedure
!
i
.
-_.
o
.y
.,
,.
'E
-
.;
.,,,,
,
,
,
.
.,
.
,
changes revealed that a procedure change had been initiated for Surveillance
. Procedure ST-flZ-1, " Containment Spray Nozzles".and that the. procedure had been revised and was presently in draf t form, awaiting plant review committee revie.i q
and' approval.
'
~
No violations or deviations were identified-in theireview of these program arear.,
3.
EXIT IllTERVIEll On January 12,1990 the inspector met with Mr. K. J. Morris and-other members ofLthe. licensee's or,ganization identified in paragraph 1.. The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection and presented the-inspection findings..
The licensee did not identify, as-propriet ry, any information Used'in the'
performance of.this inspection.
"
.
.
!
i i
i
!
!
.:
s
. 3
f
=i
-
!
,
<l I
l
.
..
-
.
.
&
'o
,e
.
'
.
.~
,
.
ATTACHMENT Documents Reviewed During This Inspection'.
SOG-23;"SurveillanceTestProgram"
,
-
'SO M-2, " Preventive Maintenance Program"
'
,
S0 M-26. " Calibration Procedures"'
SO G-30, "Setpoint/ Procedure-Changes and Generation" SO G-71,;" CHAMPS Data Base Update" USAR, Appendix A, Section A.12, " Test Control" and Section A'.15, " Inspection,
'
i Test, and Operating Status" Technical Specification Section 3.0, " Surveillance Requirements,"-
'
Amendments 119,' 120,121, and 122
'i
Quality Assurance Plan, QAP-6.1,." Preventive Maintenance;" QAP-8.2, " Inservice Inspection and Test;" QAP-8.3, " Plant Surveillance Test Program;"' and, QAP-8.4, " Test Control" l
CHAMPS Desk Instruction ST-NZ-1, " Containment Spray Nozzles"
~
-
~
' Draft, PE-ST-SI-0001, " Containment Spray Nozzle Flow Test"
.
,
'
'
l W
r
,
<
'
,
i t
s i
,
a-i f