IR 05000285/1990028

Insp Rept 50-285/90-28 on 900423-27.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Design Change & Mod Program & Controls

ML20042G168
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	05/03/1990
From:	Johnsonc E, Stetka T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20042G166	List: IR 05000285/1990028 ML20042G165
References
50-285-90-28, NUDOCS 9005110169
Download: ML20042G168 (5)

Text

.s

,

Il

?.

.

V

.*.

~;

~

i APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

(

NRC Inspection Report: ' 50-285/90-28 Operating License: DPR-40

'

'l Docket: 50-285 l'

Licensee: OmahaPublicPowerDistrict(OPPD)

.,

Nuclear Operations 444 South 16th Street Mall Omaha, Nebraska 68102-2247 Facility Name:

FortCalhounStation(FCS)

.,

Inspection At: TCS, Blair, Nebraska Inspection Conducted: Apr1*. 03-E7, 1990 li.spector:

anb.

.

[

S

'$- @

C. E. Johnso, eTctor Inspector, Tiant 5ste

~

Systems Secti

. Division of Reactor Safety

,

J 5-!S p-Approved:

/ ~

~/

T. 7. 3thtka, hief, Plant SystemY3ection Dat( /

,

Division of Reactor Safety

.

g Inspection Summary L

Inspection Conducted April 23-27. 1990 (R_eport 50-285/90-28)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of design change and

.

modification program and controls.

<

Results: Within the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identified. Management attention in this area is evident. The design change i

and modification program has detailed procedures and flow charts on how design changes / modifications are implemented and controlled which is considered to be a strength.

>

\\

9005110169 900504 ADOCK0500gg3 DR

.

+.- s

.

.

• ;.

-

-2-DETAILS

,

1. -persons Contacted

,

OPpD

>

• R. Andrews,-Division Manager, Nuclear Services J. Chase, Manager, Nuclear Licensing

• 0. Clayton, Supervisor, Errergency Planning

. S. Gambhir, Manager, Station Engineering

,4

• J. Gasper, Manager, Training

• W. Gatet., Division Manager, Nuclear Operations

• R. Jaworski, Hrneper, Station Engineering i

O. Leibes, Secerity Supervisot

'

.

• S. Lindquist, Lteensing Engineer

'

'*D. Matthews, Supervisor, Statior Licensing

• T. Neithews, Station Lic< nsing f/egineer

'

,

J. O' Conner, Supervisor, Electrical /I&C Design Engineer

'4

• G.-Peterson, Flant Marager

,

L Siroons. Statica Licensing Engineer

• F. Smith Superviser, Cheir.istr 4D. Spires, Quality Assurance (y ) Auditor s.

>

qA

• H. Tesar, Supervisor, Trairdr.g-

-

~'

D. Trausch, Supervisor, Operctions N. Uhland, Supervisor, Technical Training NRC

,

• P. Harrell, Senior Resident; Inspector

• T.'Reis, Resident Inspector

• B. Spitzberg, Emergency Preparedness Analyst

• Denotes those that attended the exit interview.

'The inspector also interviewed other licensee errployees during the inspection.

,

2.

Design. Design Changes and Modification The purpose of this inspection was to ascertain that design changes'and i

nx>difications that are determined by the licensee to not require prior hpproval by the NRC are. in conformance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications (TS),10 CFR 50.59, Safety Analysis Report-(SAR), and the licensee'sQualityAssurance(QA) Plan.

.

2.1 proc,edure/ program Review The inspector reviewed several procedures portaining(S0) procedure G-21to the design package (DCP)/modificationprogram. Standing Order establishes the procedural steps and responsibilities for initiating,

,

i.

i.-

.

.

L t,

.

.

I-

-3-reviewing, approving and cancelling a modification. 50 G-21 also governs the implementation, acceptance, and closcout requirements for a modification and

L defines the. requirements applicable to field change documentation.

SO G-21 gives detailed instructions and provides flow charts on how modifications are controlled. Procedures reviewed by the inspector were adequate.

Procedures reviewed are listed in the Attachn.ent to this report.

• 2.2 DesignChangepackage(DCp) Review The inspector selected six DCPs/ modifications from various systems for

L docurentation review and examination. The majority of the DCPs reviewed were

~

still in progress. DCPs were reviewed by the inspecto. to determine if the following had occurred:

DCps were reviewed ard t.pnrw ed by the Plent Review Committee (PRC);

f

DCPs were controlled by gproved procedures; 10 CTR 50.59 u fety evaluaticos hed been port'orw e and contained suffleient

detail to evaluate 311 unteriewed tafety gestions;

Operator training ptograce, waie reviseu and i:ocessary operator trairing was cond,1cted prior to a modifico system bMng declared opertble;

,

Control room drawing changes, required as the result of a modification, were made; and.

• Test records / procedures were reviewed and approved by the licensee prior to the modified system being declared operable.

L The inspector noted one item of concern pertaining to the 10 CFR 50.59 annual reporting requirements. The licensee was submitting a monthly report that did not meet the requirements of the 10 CFR 50.59 regulation. Further investigation indicated that this item was previously identified in NRC Inspection

,

Report 50-285/90-06. As the result of this inspection report finding, the licensee committed in letter t.IC-90-0138, dated February 15, 1990, to provide

'

the 10 CFR 50.59 reports on an annual basis with the first submittal being March 1, 1991.

The inspector conducted interviews and held discussions with licensee personnel directly involved in the preparation, tracking, evaluation, and approval of a

DCPs. Personnel interviewed were knowledgeable of the current program and of'

the procedures in place. The DCPs reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

?

2.3 FieldyerificationofDCPs/Hodifications r

The inspector, accompanied by a licensee representative, visually inspected

'several modified systems to verify the as-built field condition. This inspection verified that the installation conformed to the as-built drawings.

No discrepancies were identifie,

f

[* ;.:

.

.

j.

.....

-4-

>

p.

L lv Temporary Modification 2.4 e

The inspector reviewed procedure S0 G-25 pertaining to the control of temporary L

modifications (TM). This procedure applies to both safety-related and nonsafety-reltted systems. The implementation of TM program controls requires the following:

Review and approval of the TM by the plant Review Comittee (PRC);

Performance of a 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation;

-

t

• . Maintenance of a formal record that provides the status of 1M5;

Independet,t verification; and, Use of datailed approved procedures v: hen perforwing IMs.

• Revitw of one TM by the inspector indicated that the requirements et

'

Froct:drye St! G-25 were implemented properly. The TM end procedure ret u;wed 4,re 11sttd in the Attachment.

.

Cn,c)usion 3.

i

- The inspector deteririnted that Ldequate controls arid procedures pertaining to

the design change /n'odification program including temporary nodifications isave

,

l

'been established and are in accordance with regulatory requirements and the i,

licensee's QA program..

l4 Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee personnel (denoted in paragraph 1) on April'27, 1990, and sumarized the scope and findings of. tais inspection as detailed in this report. - No information was identified as proprietary.

.

h

.' },

2I

-.

y

{.

-

,

y. a.

.

.

d.

• %.

.

i ATTACHMENT

'

Modification Procedures I

$0 G-21, * Modification Control,* Revision 39, March 16,1990 l

gel-3, " Preparation of Design Packages," Revision 3. January 31, 1990

.

?

Safety Evaluation Procedures t

..

O'

gel-27, "10 CFR $0.59 Safety Evaluation," Revision 0. November 15, 1990

-

N00-QP-3, "10 CFR 50.59 Saf ety Evaluations," Revision 7. february 15, 1990

!

f TemporitryHodificationProgegr,e, I

.

$0 G-2 3. " Temporary Mcdiff ration Control," Re.Hsion 30, March 27,1990

!

a

[

,

I

Document Control Protec'ures

!

GET.37, "Onwing Cct. trol Instruction for Design Charage Packa9es," Devisien 0,

!

December 198P.

,

GCli38, " Pal 0/EM Drawing 1%uatice Instruction," Revision 0, Pay 31,1989

'

GEI-39, " Marking of As-Duilt Drnings ilnder itevision," Revision 1, September 8,

[

1989-l 50-C-5, "Ft. Calhoun Station Print files," Revision 11, October.

i

.

'

17, 1989 i

. Design Change Packages / Modification Package

!

'*fC 85-033, " Evaluation Replacement of Process / Area Radiation Monitors'

FC B6-091, "Limitorque Motor Operator Update"

FC 86-049, " Redistribute Loads /DC !!usses and Inverter"

"

• FC 89-025, "RC5 Harrow Range Level Instrun.ent" l

FC 89-068, "Al-179 Indication!."

,

• fC 89-051, "DG fuel Transfer Pump Instrument PO-4A/4b-1 & F0-4A/4B

• Yerified by field inspection.

Temporary Hodification Package i

88-E-061, "RC Surge Line"

'

'

.

'

>

=

'(

,.

_.