IR 05000280/1982013

IE Insp Repts 50-280/82-13 & 50-281/82-13 on 820601-02.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Planning,Specifically Interface Between Licensee & Region 3 at Emergency Response Facility

ML20058G162
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	07/07/1982
From:	Jenkins G, Taylor P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20058G155	List: IR 05000280/1982013 ML20058G149
References
50-280-82-13, 50-281-82-13, NUDOCS 8208030221
Download: ML20058G162 (4)

Text

. .

[ 'o, UNITED STATES 8 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$ E REGION 11 o, - 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W SUITE 3100 s ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303

Report Nos. 50-280/82-13 and 50-281/82-13 Licensee: Virginia Electric and Power Company P. O. Box 26666 Richmond, VA 23262 Facility Name: Surry Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 Inspection at Surry site near Surry, Virginia Inspector: t[ d af 7- 7- P. A. Taylo ,

g Date Signed Approved :/ [ ##" #d 7~7~#d

.

-

G. R. Jenkins, Chief " Date Signed

-

Emergency Preparedness Section EPOS Division SUMMARY Inspection on June 1-2, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved nine inspector-hours on site in the i areas of emergency planning, specifically the interface between the licensee organization and the responding NRC Region II organization at the Emergency Response Facilities.

l Results Within the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

i l

!

8208030221 820707 0PDR ADOCK 05000280 PDR

.. .

DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• R. Saunders, Assistant Station Manager

• F. Cox, Coordinator, Emergency Planning

• E. Topping, Corporate Emergency Planner R. Smith, Staff Engineer J. Martin, Director Emergency Preparedness W. Stewart, Manager Nuclear Operations & Maintenance S. Sarver, Health Physics Supervisor B. Dunlap, III, Engineer Other Organizations H. Allard, Chief, Radiological Planning Branch, Commonwealth of Virginia NRC Resident Inspector

• Davis, Resident Inspector

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 1, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 abov . Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspecte . Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio . Emergency Response Facilities General The inspector reviewed with a licensee representative aspects of an NRC Region II response to an emergency at the site and the necessity that preplanning take place in order to interface effectively with the licensee organization and other organizations (Federal, State and local

. -. -- - . - -_ - - - - - _

.. .  !

,

!

1 agencies) particularly at the Technical Support Center (TSC) and the I

Emergency Operating Facility (EGF).

i Included in the review with the licensee representatives were the following Region II activities which explain the nature of the NRC role onsite during an emergency.

l

?

-

Response to incident of the " Site Aree." and " General" unergency severity classification level as defined in 10cFR50, Appendix E,Section I *

-

Interface with the licensee organization in order to evaluate the nature and extent of the incident, ascertain plant status, monitor licensee activities and ensure appropriate corrective actions are

taken to minimize the consequences of the inciden ,

-

Inform the public and others of plant status and the technical details concerning the inciden Develop projections of onsite and offsite radiological effects for

! use by other Federal, State and local agencie ' ' Interim Technical Support Center

! The inspector toured the interim TSC which is located adjacent to the i

control room and in a room (approximately 25' x 30') identified as the ,

,

control room annex. The Emergency Director, selected plant super- <

visors, supporting technical and administrative personnel operate from

this room to assess and manage an emergency. An office (approximately l 9' x 15') inmediately adjacent to the location of the Emergency Director has been designated for NRC use. The location of this office should enable a direct interface between NRC Region II management and

. the licensee organization. The NRC room is equipped with commercial /

inplant telephones (2), the NRC emergency notification system (ENS)

i telephone, desks (2),chairsandchalkboard. No NRC health physics -

l network (liPN) telephone is installed within the interim TSC. Another

office (approximately 12' x 15') within the TSC is used by the licensee for environmental and radiological data coordination and technical

'

suppor .

! Interim Emergency Operations Facility The inspector toured the interim E0F which is located in the Surry

Power Station Training Center. The training center is approximate i mile from the plant. During an emergency the Recovery. Manager and

! specified licensee personnel conduct their operations from the training i

!

,

._v., m , ~ ,- -y,,,. ,y . -.__.r.-..--7 m- , m-._ . - --. . - - _ .-s-- . - .- - - . . - . . . . . . _ = . . . - - - _ - - . . .-- - -- .

-3-l'

'

i

,

f l

center simulator room. The area where the Racovery Manager and his staff is

.

located is approximately 15' x 20'. Activities that are conducted in this area include environmental and radiological data coordination and communi-cations coordination. The inspector informed.9 licensee ' representative that NRC i

Region II management would need to interface directly with the licensee organization at this location in order to properly evaluate an incident. ' A table  ;

i and chairs for three or four NRC representatives will be'provided in this are The NRC (ENS) telephone is not located in this area. TheNRC(HPN)telephoneis

located in this area. A classroom adjacent to the EOF (approximately 18' x 40')

l has been designated for NRC use and is equipped with several tables, chairs and i

'

commercial /inplant telephones (3). The NRC (ENS) and (HPN) telephones are not installed in the classroo ~

,

The NRC mobile laboratory is nohmally sent to the E0F during a NRC Region II

! response. A licensee representative indicated that space and support could be i provided for the mobile laboratory. The inspector gave the licensee representa-

{ tive the following information concerning the mobile unit: Level space (14' x

'

35'); ' electrical power (3-115V, 20 amp power receptacles; hubble twist lock); and a conmerdial' telephone line or and extension of an existing commercial telephone .

j line equipped with a jack for connecting to the mobile unit.

!

$-

a 1 t m

l <

\

!

'e i

'

\

'

'.

.

*

y *

/4

.

• ,

,

L

!

t i

'

.

I

!  ;

- -._ _ , , - _ _ ___, .- _ ,,. _ - _ - _ -