IR 05000275/1982009
| ML20050A018 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1982 |
| From: | Carlson J, Mendonca M, Young J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050A012 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-82-09, 50-275-82-9, NUDOCS 8203290552 | |
| Download: ML20050A018 (4) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
REGION V
e s
Report No. so_27 s /a7_no Docket No. so_2 7 s License No.
DPR-76 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Pacific Cas and Electric Connany P.
O.
Box 7442 San Francisco. California'94106 Facility Name:
Diablo Canyon Unit 1 Inspection at:
Diablo Canyon Site. San Luis Obispo County, California Inspection con cted:
January 30 to February 27, 1982 Inspectors:
]~
.
Jo in D. Cpron, S(j id edt eactor Inspector Date Signed t
~
gu4,.
3-g-sa-
.
Megonca Rfsident/ Reactor Inspector Date Signed Marvin M.
Date Signed b
37/#M
.
Approved by:
,
-
Young Jr.GChief Rp/1ctor Projects Section 2 Date Signed Reactor Operations (?rMjects
~ '
T.
Branch Date Signed Summary:
Inspection of January 30 to February 27, 1982'(Report No. 50-275/82-09 Areas Inspected:
Routine inspections of plant operations, surveillance testing, physical security, maintenance, and programmatic reviews of document control, records, and personnel qualifications.
The inspection involved 145 inspector-hours by two NRC Resident Inspectors.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were
-
identified.
RV Form 219 (2)
8203290552 820310 PDR ADOCK 05000275 C
~
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- R.
Thornberry, Plant Manager-
- R.
Patterson, Plant Superintendent
- J.
M.
Giscion, Power Plant Engineer
- D.
A.
Backens, Supervisor of Maintenance
- J.
A.
Sexton, Supervisor of Operations
- J.
V.
Boots, Supervisor of Chemistry and Radiction Protection
- C.
M.
Seward, Acting Supervisor of Quality Assurance
- W.
B.
Kacfer, Technical Assistant to the Plant Manager
- R.
G.
Tadaro, Acting Security Supervisor The inspectors also' talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including shift supervisors, reactor and aux-iliary operators, maintenance personnel, plant technicians and engineers, quality assurance (QA) personnel and members of general construction.
- Denotes tnose attending the exit interview.
2.
Operational Safety Verification During the inspection period, the inspectors observed and examined activities to verify the operational safety of the licensee's facility.
The observations and examinations of those activities were conducted on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis.
On a daily basis, the inspectors' observed control room activities to verify the licensee's adheren'ce to limiting conditions for prescribed in,the facility Technical Specifications.
operations as Logs, instrumentation, recorder traces, and other operating records were examined to 6btain information on plant conditions, trends, and compliance with regulations.
The turnover of in-formation-oh' plant s tatus-was observed to determine that all pertinent,information was~ relayed.
During'each' week, 'the inspectors toured the accessible areas of the facility to observe the following items:
a.
General plant and equipment conditions; b.
Maintenance requests and repairs; c.
Fire hazards and fire fighting equipment; d.
Ignition sources and flammable material control; e.
Conduct of activities as per the licensee's administrative controls and approved procedures; f.
Interiors of electrical and control panels;
,
_f_
'
o
,
,
,
g.
Implementation of the licensee's physical, security plan; and
'
h.
Plant hou s eke e p ing1 c leadline s s'; ~
'
During each week, the inspect'is conversed withoperat' ors in o
the control room, and other plant personnel'.
The discussions centered on pertinent topics; relating to general ^~pla'nt condi-tions, procedures, security,_ training, and other. topics aligned with the work activities involved.
The inspectors examined the licensce's nonconformance. reports to confirm the deficiencies
'
were identified and traced by the system.
Identified noncon-formances were being tracked and followed to the completion of corrective action.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Maintenance Maintenance activities including both preventive and corrective maintenance were reviewed by the inspectors during the month.
Observations-by the inspectors verified that proper approvals, system clearance, and tests of redundant equipment were performed, as appropriate, prior to maintenance of safety-related systems or components.
The inspectors verified that qualified personnel performed the maintenance using appropriate maintenance pro-cedures.
Replacement parts were examined to determine the proper certification of materials, workmanship, and tests.
During the actual performance of maintenance activity, the inspectors checked for proper fire protection controls and-housekeeping,-as appropriate.
Upon completion of the main -
tenance activity, the inspectors verified that the component or system was properly tested prior to returning the system or component to service,
,
.No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Surveillance The' surveillance testing of safety-related systems were reviewed by the inspectors.
Observations by'the' inspectors included verification that proper procedures were used, test instrumenta-tion'were calibrated, and that the system or component being tested was properly removed from service if required by the l
test procedure.
Following completion of the surveillance tests, i
the inspectors verified that the test results met the acceptance criteria of the Technical Specifications and were reviewed by the cognizant licensee personnel.
The inspectors also verified that corrective action was initiated, if required, to determine
!
i
-3-
,
..
o for any unacceptable test results and to restore the the cause system or component to an operabic status consistent with the technical specification requirements.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Records ~ Program This inspection found that the licensee was implementing a program relating to the control of records that is in con-formance with Regulatory requirements, commitments-in the FSAR and industry guides and standards'.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Document Control Program This inspection ascertained that the licensee was implementing a QA Program for document control that is in conformance with Technical Specifications, Regulatory requirements, commitments in the FSAR and applicable industry guides and standards.
No items of noncompliance or deviations wcre identified.
,
7.
Personnel Qualification Program
.
This inspection found.that the l'icensee_had a,QA'Pogram for r
qualification of personnel that is..in conformance with Reg-ulatory requirements, commitments,in the application'and in,-
dustry guides and standards.
'
,.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified. ' '
8.
Emergency Borate Closed Centrifugal Charging Pump Recirculation Valves - Need to Open This open item is closed based on the' review of the subject procedure which includes caution to open the valves on high pressure (811301).
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) on February 26, 1982.
During this meeting, the scope and findings of the inspection were summarized by the inspectors.