IR 05000275/1982014
| ML20053C550 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1982 |
| From: | Carlson J, Mendonca M, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053C548 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-82-14, NUDOCS 8206020307 | |
| Download: ML20053C550 (3) | |
Text
1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1'
REGION V
'
Report No. 50 975/R? 16 Docket No. 5n 975 License No. nPR 76 Safeguards Group Licensee:
pnci fi c cnc nna vine,vic enmnnny P_
O.
Box 7449 J
Snn Francisco Cnlifornin 94106 Facility Name:
Diablo Cnnyon Unit 1 Inspection at:
Dinbin Canyon site; snn T.n i s Obisno County Cnl i forn i n Inspection conduc ed:
Anril 4 to Mnv 1 - 1989 N /M "b Inspectors:
[jM ' entPfactorInspector Date Signed
.
l,' S r. b Jo D. Ca 1s'ah
& 6 w W Y,,. &
5- /9 -29-MarvinM. Mend @ca,hsi/entR,dactorInspector Date Signed Date Signed Approved By:
7fM d "" /N '
.
TolbertYoung,hr., Ch8ef,[ Reactor Proj ects Date Signed Section 2, Reactor Operatione Projects Branch Summary:
Inspection of April 4 to May 1, 1982 (Report No. 50-275/82-14)
Areas Inspected: Routine inspections of plant operations, surveillance testing, physical security, maintenance and the quality assurance program.
The inspection involved 106 inspector-hours by two NRC Resident Inspectors.
Resultsj No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
8206020307 820512 gDRADOCK05000$
RV Fonn 219 (2)
.
_.
._-
-
- -.
.-
!
,
DETAILS
.
!.
1.
Persons Contacted
- R. Thornberry, Plant Manager
'
- R.
Patterson, Plant Superintendent
- J.'M.
Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer D. A. Backens, Supervisor of Maintenance
J. A. Sexton, Supervisor of Operations
'
- J. V. Boots, Supervisor of Chemistry and Radiation Protection C. M. Seward, Acting Supervisor of Quality Assurance
- W.
B. Kaefer, Technical Assistant.to the Plant. Manager
,
- R.
G. Tadaro, Acting. Security Supervisor j
- R. C. Howe, Regulatory Compliance Engineer The inspectors also talked with and interviewed a number 1Sf other licensee employees including shift supervisors, reactor
'
and auxiliary operators, maintenance personnel, plant tech-
'
nicians and engineers, quality assurance personnel and members of general construction.
i
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
!
2.
Operational Safety Verification i
i During the inspection period, the inspectors observed and i
examined activities to verify the operational safety of the licensee's facility.
The observations and examinations of those activities were conducted on a daily, weekly, or monthly
basis.
on a daily basis, the inspectors observed control room activities
,
!
to verify the licensee's adherence to limiting conditions for i
operations as prescribed in the facility technical specifica-I tions.
Logs, instrumentation, recorder traces, and other operation records were examined to obtain information on plant conditions, trends, and compliance with regulations.
The turnover of information on plant status was observed to determine that all pertinent information was relayed.
During each week, the inspectors toured the accessible areas of the facility to observe the-following items:
a.
General plant and equipment conditions j
b.
Maintenance requests and repairs c.
Fire hazards and fire fighting equipment d.
Ignition sources and flammable material control i
-- -
-.
. -
.-
- -..
.
. -
-
--
. _.
'
-2-e.
Conduct of activities.as per the licensee's administrative controls and approved procedures f.
Interiors of electrical and control panels g.
Implementation of the licensee's physical security plan h.
Plant housekeeping cleanliness During each week, the inspectors conversed with operators in the control room, and other plant personnel.
The discussions centered on pertinent topics relating to general plant con-ditions, procedures, security, training, and other topics aligned with the work activities involved.
The inspectors examined the licensee's nonconformance reports to confirm the deficiencies were identified and tracked by the system.
Identified nonconformances were being tracked and followed to the completion of corrective action.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Maintenance Maintenance activities including both preventive and corrective maintenance were reviewed by the inspectors during the month.
,
Observations by the inspectors verified that proper approvals, system clearance, and tests of redundant equipment were per-formed, as appropriate, prior to maintenance of safety-related systems or components.
The inspectors verified that qualified personnel performed the maintenance using appropriate main-tenance procedures.
Replacement parts were examined to deter-mine the proper certification of materials, workmanship, and tests.
During the actual performance of maintenance activities, the inspectors checked for proper fire protection controls and housekeeping, as appropriate.
Upon completion of the maintenance activity, the inspectors verified that the com-ponent or system was properly tested prior to returning the system or component to service.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Surveillance The surveillance testing of safety-related systems were reviewed by the inspectors.
Observations by the inspectors included verification that proper procedures were used, that test instrumentation was calibrated, and that che system or component being tested was properly removed from service if
_ _ _ _ _ __,
.
_..-_.
- _
.
,
.
_
_ _. _ _
..
'
-3-
'
.
required by the test procedure.
Following completion of the surveillance tests, the inspectors verified that the test results met the acceptance criteria'of the technical specifi-cations and were reviewed by the cognizant licensee personnel.
The inspectors also verified that corrective action was ini-tiated,.if required, to determine the cause for any unacceptable
test results and to restore the system or component to an a
operable status consistent with the technical specification requirements.
,
5.
Quality Assurance / Quality Control Administration Program The licensee's QA Program has been reviewed.
An interview must be conducted with QA management to discuss the findings.
This will be done during the first part of June.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
!
6.
Exit Interview
j The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) on April 30, 1982.
During this meeting, the scope and findings of the inspection were summarized by the inspectors.
.
f
!
r I
(
l l
l
se.,.7-t'""-
" ' ' * ' - - ' ' ' - - * " " ' ^ ~ ~*tF
' ' - ' ' * - - " " - ' ' " ' - '
'"'"*-*r'
' * - * ' ' ' " ' " - * " -
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' - ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -
' " - * " ~ ' ' '
-'