IR 05000275/1982006
| ML20041C828 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1982 |
| From: | Carlson J, Mendonca M, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041C818 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-82-06, 50-275-82-6, NUDOCS 8203020592 | |
| Download: ML20041C828 (5) | |
Text
-
-
-
..
.. -_
.-.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
,
REGION V
,
Report No.
sn_,7sfa,_nn Docket No.
sn_97s License No.
DPR-76 Safeguards Group I
Licensee:
pnc,fic cnm ana viectric connany P.
n.
Rnv 7447 Rnn Frnncicco. cniffornin 94106
.
Facility Name:
ninhin ennynn unir 1 i
Inspection at:
ninhin canvnn stro san tuis obisno county. californin
'
Inspection conducted:
minnary 2 to.innnary 29.
1982 Inspectors:
A uL ML5"d
',
M O
~
M D.
ca'is.7, Sr.
~
es ent actor Inspector Date Signed alc am we a-93
'
.
R e a,$t o r Inspector Date Signed Marvin Mendor a,
Resi a
Date Signed Y
d[10d M~
Approved By:
.
/
r
'
Young,hr., Reaho Projects Section 2 Date Signed Tolbert Simnary:
Inspection of January 2 to January 29, 1982 (Report
'
No. 50-275/82-06)
Areas Inspected: Routine inspections of plant operations, surveillance testing, physical security, maintenance, and follow-up on LERs.
The inspection involved 54 inspector-hours by two NRC Resident Inspectors.
!
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
8203020592 820211
PDR ADOCK 05000275 RV Form 219 (2)
O PDR
, _.
,
-.
-
-.
.~
_ -
.
.. -
, _
--.. _._
_
__
m
.
_
.
._
-
-
e 4.
.
-
{, '
DETAILS
u
<
r
'
l.
Persons Contacted
.
,
R.
Thornberry, Plant Manager l
R.
Patterson, Plant Superintendent
~
- J.
M.
Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer
- D.
A.
Backens, Supervisor of Maintenance
J.-A.
Sexton, Supervisor of Operations 1*J.
V.
Boots, Supervisor of Chemistry and Radiation Protection
.
- C.
M.
Seward, Acting Supervisor of Quality Assurance (QA)
- W.
B.
Kacfer, Technical Assistant to the Plant Manager
- R.
G.
Tadaro, Acting Security Supervisor
-
The inspectors also talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including shift supervisors, reactor
and auxiliary operators, maintenance personnel, plant technicians and engineers, quality assurance personnel, and members of general construction.
i
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Operation Safety Verification
During the inspection period, the inspectors observed and examined activities to verify the operational' safety of the
!-
licensee's facility, The observations and examinations of j
those activities were conducted on a daily, weekly, or monthly
!
basis.
On a daily basis, the inspectors observed control room activities
,
to verify the licensee's adherence to limiting conditions for
. operations as prescribed in the facility Technical Specifications.
Logs, instrumentation, recorder traces, and other operation records were examined to obtain information on plant conditions, trends, and compliance with regulations.
The turnover of infor-
'
mation on plant status was observed to determine that-all pertinent i
information was relayed.
l
.
Dur'ing'each week, the inspectors toured the accessible areas of l
'the facility to observe the following items:
i a.
General plant and equipment conditions;
,
b.
Maintenance requests and repairs; c.
Fire hazards and fire fighting material control; d.
Ignition sources and flammable material control; e.
Canduct of activities as per the licensee's administra-
,
tive controls and approved procedures;
.
.~.v.--
.,--e,_
,,.-se.-,
, - - - ~ -.,,. - -.
.
-r
.
e _,,,.,, = - - -..,,,,,.
.., -,
,w
,
-,
-,,
y
- - - - - - - - -,, -
_-
.
__
_
_ _
_.
- -
... _ _.
_
_
._ __
_
_
<
.
.
-2-i
!
f.
Interiors of electrical and control panels; g.
Implementation of the licensee's physical security plan; and h.
Plant housekeeping and cleanliness; During each week, the inspectors conversed with operators in the control room, and other plant personnel.
The discussions centered on pertinent topics relating to general plant condi-tions, procedures, security, training, and other topics aligned i
with the work activities involved.
The inspectors examined the licensee's nonconformance reports to confirm the deficiencies were identified and traced by the
system.
Identified nonconformances were being tracked and followed to the completion of corrective action.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Maintenance Maintenance activities including both preventive and corrective maintenance were reviewed by the inspectors during the month.
l Observations by the inspectors verified that proper approvals, system clearance, and tests of redundant equipment were per-formed, as appropriate, prior to maintenance of safety-related systems or components.
The-inspectors verified that qualified personnel performed the maintenance using appropriate maintenance procedures.
Replacement parts were examined to determine the proper certification of materials, workmanship and tests.
During the actual performance of the maintenance activity, the inspectors checked for proper fire protection ~ controls and housekeeping, as appropriate.
Upon completion of the maintenance activity, the inspectors verified that the component or system was properly tested prior to returning the system or component to service.
No' items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
' Surveillance The surveillance testing.of safety-related s'ystems was reviewed
by the inspectors.
Observations by"the inspectors included i
verification that proper procedures.were used,-that test in-
!
strumentation was calibrated and that-the system or component being tested was properly removed from service if required by the test procedure.
Following com'pletion of the surveillance
,
tests, the inspectors verified that,the test results met the l
<
I i
,
-,, - -,, -.. -.. - -
,,,,,, -,
y,,,.,
,,e,,. -,,,
ww,,
y..,,,_-.,._,..-,,,,,,,,,.,,y
.,,.,,,,,,,,,yyy
,,,,,,c,c.,.
.
..,--3
,-,,,,,,y
-
,,3,,y-,-
-,-,,, -,
-
,,
.
_3_
-
acceptance criteria of tne Technical Specifications and were reviewed by the cognizant licensee personnel.
The inspectors also verified that corrective action was initiated, if required, to determine the cause for any unacceptable test results and to restore the system or component to an operable status con-sistent with the Technical Specification requirements.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Licensee Event Report (LER) Follow-up The circumstances and corrective action described in the LER Nos. 81-07, 81-08, 81-09, and 81-10 were examined by the in-spectors.
The inspectors found that each LER had been re-viewed by the licensee and reported to-the NRC within the proper reporting intervals.
The inspectors verified that appropriate corrective actions were taken.
These LERs are considered closed.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Non-routine Reporting Program This inspection was conducted to ascertain: (1) whether responsibilities have been assigned for review and evalua-tion of off-normal operating events, planned and unplanned maintenance activities, surveillance testing, and outage act-ivities assure conformance with regulatory requirements; and (2) whether there is a program to review and assure corrective action for vendor bulletins and circulars.
This inspection found that the licensee's program and its implementation is in conformance with NRC accepted programs.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Housekeeping / Cleanliness Program This inspection was conducted to ascertain whether the licensee is implementing adequate housekeeping and cleanliness controls to assure that the quality of safety-related systems is main-tained.
It is found that the licensee's program and its implementation is in conformance with the NRC accepted program.
!
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
General l
The resident inspectors attended the ASLB hearings for full power licensing, as support to the NRC staff.
l l
-
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _
.
.
-4-
Also, Commissioner Tom Roberts, Gary Zech, and Jessica Laverty, the Commissioner's technical and legal assistants, respectively, were given a site tour by the resident inspectors.
The tour included the control room, Unit 1 containment, and the Technical Support Center.
9.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) on January 29, 1982.
During this meeting, the scope and findings of the inspection were stimmarized by the inspectors.
l l
_- - ____-_