IR 05000269/1989035

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-269/89-35,50-270/89-35 & 50-287/89-35 on 891030-1101.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Soils & Concrete for Installation of ISFSI
ML15224A602
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/1989
From: Conlon T, Harris J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML15224A601 List:
References
50-269-89-35, 50-270-89-35, 50-287-89-35, NUDOCS 8912130277
Download: ML15224A602 (4)


Text

Pt REG (UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.: 50-269/89-35, 50-270/89-35, and 50-287/89-35 Licensee:

Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270, License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, and and 50-287 DPR-55 Facility Name:

Oconee 1, 2, and 3 Inspection Conducted: October 30 - November 1, 1989 Inspector:

/t-S i

J. R. Harris Date Signed Approved by


__

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

/

~~

T. Conlon, Chief Date Signed Plant Systems Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of soils and concrete for installation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation at the Oconee sit Results:

In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identifie REPORT DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • R.-D. Lingle, Duke ONS Operations
  • E. G. Legette, Duke ONS Compliance
  • M. S. Tuckman, Duke Station Manager Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included craftsmen,,engineers, operators, mechanics, and technician NRC Resident Inspector
  • P. Skinner
  • Attended exit interview 2-.

Temporary Instruction 2690/00 Inspection of Horizontal Storage Modules for dry storage of spent fuel at Oconee Nuclear Station a. Review of Quality Assurance Implementing Controls. Quality Assurance implementing controls examined by the inspector included the following specifications, procedures and drawing. Specification OSS-0009.000-0002, Backfill for QA Conditions 2. Specification OSS.0009.00-00-0004, Earthwork for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage (ISFSI)

3. QCC-4, Inspection of Compacted Earth Fills 4. QCC-5, Inspection of Structural Steel Fabrication and Erection 5. QCC-1, Inspection of QA Condition Concrete 6. QCC-2, Inspection of Structural Grouting 7. Drawing No. 0-39.01.01, Earthwork and Drainage 8. Drawing No. 0-39.01.02, Earthwork and Drainage Sections and Details 9. Drawing No. 0-39.01.05, Earthwork and Drainage Secondary Spoil Area 1 Drawing N.01.06, Project Earthwork and Drainage Alternate Secondary Spoil Area

  • I

1 Drawing N.01.07,, Earth Work and Drainage Alternate Secondary Spoil Area Sections and Details 1 Drawing N.02.01, Horizontal Storage Modules Concrete Plans 1 Drawing N.02.02, Project Horizontal Storage Modules Concrete Sections 1 Drawing No. 0-39.02.03, Horizontal Modules Concrete Sections 1 Drawing No. 0-39.03.01, Horizontal Storage Modules Reinforcing Plans 1 Drawing No. 0-39.03.02, Horizontal Storage Modules Reinforcing Sections 1 Drawing No 0-39.03.03, Horizontal Storage Modules Reinforcing Plans and Section.

Drawing No. 0-39.04.01, Horizontal Storage Modules Miscellaneous Steel 1 Drawing No. 0-39.04.02, Horizontal Storage Modules Miscellaneous Steel Review of these specifications, procedures and drawings indicated that they met NRC requirements and national codes and standard Review of records for the foundation covered field density tests, borings, and compaction test Review of these records indicated that these tests were performed in accordance with NRC and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) requirement c. Review of Records Documenting Certification, Test Data and Inspections Review of records included certification records for cement, aggregates and reinforcing steel; test data for slump, air, concrete weight and concrete strength; quantities of cement aggregates and water being included in concrete mixe Review of certification records and test data showed that the materials met specification requirements and that the concrete being placed met design require ment Review of QA records showed that the inspections were being performed and documented in accordance with requirement The inspector also verified that the concrete being placed was done in accordance with NRC, American Concrete Institute (ACI)

and ASTM requirement. Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on November 1, 1989, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection result The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.