IR 05000269/1989006
| ML16127A307 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1989 |
| From: | Blake J, Robert Carrion NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16127A306 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-89-06, 50-269-89-6, 50-270-89-06, 50-270-89-6, 50-287-89-06, 50-287-89-6, NUDOCS 8903160485 | |
| Download: ML16127A307 (9) | |
Text
REC0J UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
S101MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:
50-269/89-06, 50-270/89-06, and 50-287/89-06 Licensee:
Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270, License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, and and 50-287 DPR-55 Facility Name:
Oconee 1, 2, and 3 Inspection Con te January 30 -
February 3, 1989 Inspector:
2*-3*
e7
.
Ia-r
v__
Date Signed Approved by: lake, ChiefSigned M at i als and Processes Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas *of observation of ISI activities, including review of NDE organization, procedures, personnel records and witnessing-of several NDEs. Also, housekeeping practices were observed during a walkdow Results:
In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identifie This inspection indicates an effective ISI progra REPORT DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- E. Anderson, Design Engineer, Oconee Site Office C. Boyd, Sr. Project Engineer, Oconee Site Office
- R. Brackett, QA Director, OPS, Oconee T. Coleman, Technical Support Specialist H. Dummeyer, QA Surveillance Specialist B. Evans, QA Inspection Clerk
- E. LeGette, SS/Compliance C. Rogers, Maintenance Insepctor A J. Setzer, Maintenance Inspector, Level II (NDE Section)
- M. Tuckman, Station Manager Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included engineers, operators, technicians, and administrative personne Other Organization Babcock and Wilcox W. Pursinger, ISI Inspector, Level II NRC Resident Inspectors P. Skinner, Senior Resident Inspector (SRI)
- L. Wert, Resident Inspector (RI)
- Attended Exit.Interview 2. Observation of Inservice Inspection (ISI) Activities (73753)
a. The licensee was in the mi.dst of the eleventh outage of the second interval of the second ten-year cycle for Unit 1. Units 2 and 3 are scheduled for outages later in the yea During this inspection, nondestructive examinations (NDEs)
were witnessed on four welds, including three on which liquid penetrant tests (PT)
were performed and one on which ultrasonic testing (UT)
was performe For each witnessed examination, the inspector verified that the following requirements were met:
(1) Approved procedures were available, were being followed, and specified NDE equipment was being use (2) Examination personnel were knowledgeable of examination method and operation of test equipmen (3)
Examination personnel with proper level of qualification and certification were performing the various examination activities, including designation of examination method/
technique to be used, equipment calibration, examination, and interpretation/evaluation/acceptance of test result (4) Examination results, evaluation of results, and any corrective actions/repairs/replacements were being recorded as specified in the ISI program and NDE procedure The UT witnessed by the inspector was performed on weld number 1PZR-WP33-1, between a pressurizer relief nozzle and the pressurizer head of the -pressurizer located in the "A" cavity of the Unit 1 Containment Buildin The complete examination was witnessed, including pre-and post-instrument calibration, inner radius examination using a 45 transducer, as well as examinations using 0, 45 and 60 transducer Specifics about equipment/materials used include:, search unit instrument type was Krautkramer, USD-10, serial number 31501-537, calibration due date April 12, 1989; digital thermometer, identification number OCQA-177, calibration due date September 23, 1989; the.couplant was Ultragel II, batch number 8661, manufactured by Echo. Ultrasound, Inc., of Lewistown, P The PTs witnessed were performed on weld number 1PIA2-12, between a nozzle and Reactor Coolant Pump 1A2 of Unit 1, and 1-53B-10-B80 and 1-53B-10-B81, between spool pieces of system 53B located in the Unit 1 Auxiliary Building. The complete examination of each weld was witnessed. Consumables used include:
Spotcheck Cleaner/Remover SKC-S, batch number 87JO29; Spotcheck Penetrant SKL-HF/SKL-S, batch number 84H015; Spotcheck Developer SKD-S, batch number 88CO42. All of the above-referenced consumables were manufactured by Magniflu The inspector reviewed the qualifications and certifications of the inspection personnel (Levels I and II)
observed during observation of work activities, as well as five other randomly selected examiners involved with the ISI to ascertain whether the qualification and certification records properly reflect the following:
-
Employer's name
-
Person certified
-
Activity qualified to perform Level of certification
-
Effective period of certificatibn Signature of individual certifying title and level Basis used for certification, such as the required number of training hours, etc., for the examination method specified Annual visual acuity, color vision examination, and periodic recertificatio b. Review of Inservice Inspection Program (73051)
The licensee's ISI program was reviewed for completeness and conformance with regulatory requirement In particular, the following sections of the Duke Power ASME Section XI Manual were reviewed:
Date of Section Title Revision Issue A
Purpose, Organization and Responsi-
6/24/88 bility B
Control of Manual
6/24/88 C
Procurement and Handling of Code
6/24/88 Items Inservice Inspection and Testing
6/24/88 Repair, Replacement, and Maintenance
6/24/88 Activities Records
6/24/88 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment
6/24/88 Authorized Inspection Agency
6/24/88 Audit and Surveillance Activities
6/24/88
Also reviewed were Procedure QA-513, Revision 6, entitled "Control of Inservice Inspection Plans and. Reports,"
issued on, April 29, 1988, from the Duke Power QA Program Manual, and Procedure QCL-14, Revision 8, entitled "ISI Visual Examination, VT-3 and VT-4," issue on June 27, 1988, from the Duke Power Quality Control Procedure Manua Based on the above, the inspector concluded that:
-
The ISI program, including examinations and tests, is in conformance with relevant ASME Code Section XI editions and addenda, and Code cases proposed for use as part of the pla.The services of an Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII)
have been procured and the ISI plan has been reviewed by the ANII in accordance with Article IWA-2120 of the ASME Cod. Site administrative procedures are in place to define the authority and responsibilities of the persons or organizations involved with the final evaluation and acceptance of ISI results for the license Procedures are established for the corrective action of conditions adverse to quality as detected during examination, including provisions to preclude repetition of such adverse condition Audits or surveillances of ISI activities are conducted by qualified QA personnel to verify compliance with the ISI progra Procedures are established to effectively oversee contractor activities concerned with IS c. Review and Evaluation of Inservice Inspection Data The inspector reviewed site NDE inspection records for the current outage to:
(1) Ascertain whether the reported data covers the scope of examination required during the current inspection period of the inspection interva (2) Ascertain whether the ISI data files are complete and the data are within the previously established acceptance criteri (3) Ascertain whether the licensee's disposition of adverse findings and subsequent re-examiantion is consistent with regulatory requirement (4)
Ascertain whether the licensee is utilizing the services of a third party inspection agency, as require (5) Ascertain whether the selected records contain or provide reference to the following documents:
(a) Examination results and data sheets (b) Examination equipment dat (c) Calibration data sheets (d) Examination evaluation data (e) Records on extent of examination (f) Records on deviation from program and procedures including justification for deviation, if applicable (g) Records on disposition of findings (h) Identification of NDE material such as penetrant, penetrant cleaner, couplant, et (6) Ascertain whether the method, extent, and technique of examination comply with the licensee's ISI program and applicable NDE procedur (7) Ascertain whether the examination data are within the acceptance criteria as outlined in the applicable NDE procedur (8) Ascertain whether the recording, evaluating, and dispositioning of findings are in compliance with the applicable NDE procedur (9) Ascertain whether inservice NDE results are compared with the recorded results of prior Section XI examination (10)
Ascertain whether the method used for NDE was sufficient to determine the full extent of indication or acceptanc In addition, the inspector ensured that the following requirements for the test records reviewed were met:
-
The examination unit calibration data sheets show no major deviations between initial and final calibration Collected examination data and any recordable indications are properly recorded to permit accurate evaluation and documentatio Evaluation of examination data is performed by a Level II or Level III examine Evaluation of examination complies with the procedur Evaluation of indicators complies with the criteria of the NDE procedur d. Review of Inservice Inspection Procedures (73052)
In order to ascertain the technical adequacy of the licensee's procedures pertaining to nondestructive examinations, the Duke Power Company Quality Assurance NDE program was reviewe Specifically, the following procedures were reviewed:
Procedure Date of Number Revision Title Issue NDE-A
Nondestructive Examination 09/08/87 Program Procedure NDE-B
Training, Qualification and 04/05/88 Certification of NDE Personnel NDE-C
Calibration/Verification of NDE 07/26/88 Equipment NDE-35
Liquid Penetrant Examination 10/20/87 NDE-40
Ultrasonic Examination Procedure 07/24/87 and Techniques for Thickness Measurements, Lamination Detection, and Stud Location
The inspector also reviewed the following procedures from the Duke Power Quality Assurance Program Manual:
Procedure Date of Number
.
Revision Title
.
Issue QA-513
Control of Inservice Inspection 04/29/88 Plans and Reports QA-514
Procedure for Discrepancies 04/15/88 Found During Inservice Inspection Visual Examination of Supports (Oconee Only).
For the above referenced procedures, the inspector determined that:
(1) Qualifications of NDE personnel are specifie (2) Methods of recording, evaluating, and dispositioning findings are established and reporting requirements are in compliance with applicable Code requirement Records identified for retention include:
(a) Examination results and data sheets (b) Examination equipment data, including records of consumable materials such as penetrant materials, ultrasonic test couplants, et (c) Calibration data sheets (d) Calibration.blocks (3) Method of examination, extent, and technique is adequately describe e. Support Walkdown A walkdown of supports modified during the current outage was conducted to assure that the support drawings adequately reflect the installed configuratio The associated calculations were also reviewed for methodology, content, and general professionalis The following supports were walked down:
Support Drawing N Revision Support Calculation N Revision 1-03A-400B-H4139 A
OSC-0962-12-0005
1-07A-400B-DE017 1A OSC-0964-02-0005
1-07A-400B-DE055 2A OSC-0964-02-0015
1-07A-400B-DE056
OSC-0964-02-0016
Also review in conjunction with the walkdown was the Duke Power Quality Control Procedure QCL-14, Revision 8, issued June 27, 1988, entitled "ISI Visual Examination, VT-3 and VT-4."
The inspector felt that the drawings were of good quality and adequately reflect the installed configuration of the support The calculations were readily available and appear to have been done to applicable codes and standard. Independent Inspection Effort The inspector conducted a general inspection of several decks of the Turbine Building, with emphasis on Units 2 and 3, the Control Rooms for all three units, and the Radwaste Building to observe activities such as housekeeping, material control, and storag While on the Turbine Building mezzanine level of Unit 2, the inspector observed an instrument, identified as 2MS TE0439, within approximately 1/8" of being in contact with a structural flooring member in which its bottom flange and part of the web had been removed to accommodate the instrumen This observation was made known to the licensee, which issued Work Request 19790C on February 3, 1989, to. resolve the issu The request was given a Priority 3, which indicates that the work is to be completed within ten days from date of issu This item is identified as IFI 50-269, 270, 287/89-06-0 Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identifie. Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on February 3, 1989, with those persons indicated in paragraph The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection results listed belo Proprietary information is not contained in this repor Dissenting comments were not received from the license One item for followup was identified, IFI 50-269, 270, 287/89-06-01,
"Interference between temperature element and structural steel," paragraph 3.