IR 05000266/1992028
| ML20126J353 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1992 |
| From: | Creed J, Madeda T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126J257 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-266-92-28, 50-301-92-28, NUDOCS 9301060126 | |
| Download: ML20126J353 (2) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ -
- _ _ - _ _ _ _
_
'
Enclosure conto h3-SAFCCUARDS f ut arWMION
U on SepDratlon Thga P
PdDS Is Decontrolled
,
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
REGION III
Reports No. 50-266/92028(DRSS); 50-301/92028(DRSS)
Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 Licenses No. OPR-24; DPR-27 Licensee Wisconsin Electric Power Company 231 West Michigan Milwaukee, WI 53201 Facility Name:
Point Beach Nucicar Plant, Units ) and 2 i
inspection At:
Plant site, Two Rivers, Wisconsin
.
Inspection Dates:
November 30 - December 4, 1992 l
Date of Previous Physical Security inspection:
Between August 17'and 26, 1992
-
Inspector:
ktud 9c 12 h s/97
}PTerryJ.'Wadeda Date Physical Security inspector Approved By:
bom lL 67 IPd97 pJames R'. Creed, Chief Date Safeguards Section i
k Insnection Summary
Insperdion on November 30 - December 4.1992 (Recorts No. 50-166/92028(DRSS):
No. 50-301/92028(DRSS))
Areas Inspected:
Routine, announced physical security and reactive material control and accountability inspection involving: management support; V tal i
area barriers.and assessment aids; access control of personnel; power supply; _
testing and maintenance; followup on previous inspection findings; and review of licensee actions after discovery of a loss of a small-amount of Special Nuclear Material (SNM).
.
.
.
flqin]11:
Three violations were identified relating to a failure to conduct
,.
required SNM inventories,-a failure to maintain records of disposal of SNM and a (non-cited)-violation relating to a failure to report a loss of SNM to the NRC in a timely manner. One inspector followup item relating to weak security dri11'results was identified.
Licensee corrective action to resolve a
,
previously identified esentting issue was not fully effective, i-Enclosure Conteins i
,
!
9301060126-921230 SAFEGUARDS It;pojjnTION-i gDR ADOCK0500g6 U on Separation This P
i
. -. - -
,-
.
.
.
.
-.
_
_
-.
i
- ' ' ~
re w arn cent 3fn.3
!
L../JAJs It@)m; Inn l',en Copar:- t ! -n
,3
' c* Io h < ars!Jod The licensee's performance in implementing the security program was good, i
Management effectiveness and support for the security program was good.
Maintenance support continued to improve and was good.
Continuing progress was noted in reducing the backlog of security maintenance work requests and reducing the number of security door events. Security equipment effectiveness and observed security personnel performance was generally very good. However, specific weaknesses were noted involving some drill results and reduced reliability of some intrusion alarm detection devices, r
i I
reelomiro Cont'itns f;AM;GUALDS IJ:!auiJLATloN Ur^a SepTrition This Ru In recontroIIod-
--
.,
,
.
....
,- --., _ - _ _, - -
_., _. _ -.
,.
,
.