IR 05000244/1991006
| ML20029C309 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1991 |
| From: | Della Ratta A, Keimig R, King E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20029C301 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-244-91-06, 50-244-91-6, NUDOCS 9103270147 | |
| Download: ML20029C309 (8) | |
Text
"
- StJTGUA033 INF0E(ATl0tl E DdBTl?N !.iADE B%
/J_0_ _ ) A d C l d. d m.t d M M v2 3l, s/y
--,.n.oma rse U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
50-244/91-06 Docket No.
50-244
,
License No.
DPR-18 Licensee: Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 59 East Avenue flochester, New York 14649 i
Facility Name:
R. E.__G4nna Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At:
Ontario, New York Inspection Conducted:
February 11 15, 1991 Inspectors:
~A
_ 03 * H,f/
A.
ella'Ratta, Physiseal Security Inspector date vW d. /b./
3/t3/c7; E. B. q ngz Physicr}ecurityInspector
'dat6 Approved by:
AM Rit t
]J / 9/
R. R. Keimig. Chief, Safeguards Section
/ datt Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards In_spection Summary:
Routine Unannounced Physical heurity (Inspection Report No. 50-244/91-06)
Areas inspected:
Onsite Follow up of Previously Identified items; Management Support, Security Program Plans and Audits; Protected and Vital Area Physical
.
Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aids; Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Power Supply; Testing, Maintenatte and Compensatory Measures; and Security Training and Qualifications.
Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements in
,the areas inspected.
l l
9103270147 910313 I
PDR ADOCK 05000244
PDR y
.-
.
..
.
-..
._
_
.
_
._
._. _
-
. - - - -
'
.
i
.
DETAILS i
1.0 Key Personnel Contacted
'
1.1 Licensee and Contractor Personnel J. Widay, Superintendent, Ginna Production
S. Spector, Plant Manger - Ginna T. Powell, Manager, Risk Management
W. Dillon, Director, Corporate Security
R. Wood, Supervisor, Nuclear Security
,
M. Fowler, Security Operations Coordinator
R. Teed, Security Training Coordinator
T. Porter, Security Systems Specialist
5. Eckert, Access' Authorization Administration
D. Leeper, Instrument and Controls Foreman
K. Laubacher, Lead Engineer M. Lilley, Manager, Nuclear Assurance
J. Fischer, Manager, Maintenance Picnning and $cheduling
A. Jones, Corrective Action Coordinator
E. Palmer, Training Supervisor - Wackenhut Corporation
L. !cott, Security Of ficer - Wackenhut Corporation M. Echert, Security Of ficer - Wackenhut Corporation 1. Beane,. Project Manager - Wackenhut Corporation 1.2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
>
'T. Moslak, Senior Resident Engineer
N. Perry, Resident Inspector l
indicates those present-at the exit interview-The inspectors also interviewed other-licensee personnel'and members of the contract security force during this inspection.
2.0 Follow-up of Previously Identified Item
.
2.1 (Closed) VIO 90-04-01:
The licensee was found in violation of the-
-
NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan) by allowing a person who was originally badged for. entry into the--Protected Area (PA) to -
exit the PA and re enter without again passing through the access search equipment, The inspectors determined through observation that theLlicensee had physically changed the configuration of the access control processing equipment such that it now prevents by-cassing the search equipment.
-.
-
.
.
-
.
.
.
--
..
.
.
.
3.0 Management Support, Security Program Plans, and Audits 3.1 Management Support - Management support for the licensee's physical security program was determined to ' e adepuate by the inspectors.
o This determination was based upon the inspectors' review, during this inspection, of the progress being made on program upgrades and the continuation of long term planning as documented in this report.
Since the last routine physical inspection, which was documented in NRC Inspection Report No. 50-244/90-21, the licensee continued to upgrade the security progrom as described below:
The licensee has issued a purchase order for three mobile
,
security shelters.
.
The licensee has purchased twelve bullet resistant vests for
the security of ficers (50's).
The licensee has provided the 50's with binoculars to better
observe the Owner Controiled Area during their tours.
New replacement binoculars were also placed in the defensive positions and in the bullet resistant area of the Guard Office.
The licensee's security contractor is in the process of purchasing
new weapons for the armed SO's.
Due to the need to train all armed S0's in the use of the now weapons, the contractor has enrolled an additional instructor in an approved firearms training course specifically developed by the manufacturer of the new weapons.
The addition of this new instructor will increase the contractor's training department to three instructors.
The licensee has scheduled unarmed self-defense training for
the contractor's training supervisor.
Based upon the inspectors' review of :the licensee's security program and the efforts being made to upgrade and enhance it, the inspectors determined that the program is continuing to receive appropriate management attention and support.
3.2 Security Program Plans - The inspector determined that the licensee is in the process of submitting a complete rrvision to tha NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan). The licensee expects to submit the revised plan to the NRC ciring May 1991.
3.3 Audits - The inspectors reviewad che licensee's annual security program audit report dated November 20, 1990 and verified that the audit had been conducted in accordance with the Plan.
The audit was performed by the licecsee's quality assurance group. assisted by security personnel contracted by the licensee.
The use of personnel with security expertise a'apeared to improve the effectiveness of the audit, as it was very comprehensive in scope.
.
-
n.
.
- --
-
~.
..
_
.
.
-
-
- -
-,
a
-.
I 5 M AM$ g warm 4e2mra m a, % li M R TE m a g g rt sunt 4.0 Protected and Vital Area ohysical Barriers, Detection and Assessment A g
_
4.1 Protected Area Barriers - The inspectors conducted a physical
. inspection-of the protectotl area (PA) barrier on february ll,1991, and determined by otiservatun that the barriers were installed and
'
maintained as described in the Plan.
The inspectors noted that the licensee is in the tirocess of a barrier upgrade program that had been developed by a nuclear security consultant.
Progress on the
barrier upgrade will be monitored during subsc; vent inspections.
'
4.2 Protected Area 00tection Aids
.The inspectors observed the PA perimeter detection aids on February 12, '991, and determined that they were installed, maintained, and operated as committed to in the Plan.
AMS SkIEGUQt)$
R,liisI f
.
,
4.3 Isolatf on Zones - The inspectors verified that the isolation zones
-
were acequately maintained to permit observation of, activities on both sider, of the protected area barrier. No deficienci25 were
)<
noted.
-4.4 Assessment Aids - The inspectors. observed the PA parimeter assessment system and determined that 0;, was installed, maintained, and operated as committed to in the Plan,
.
I f
r
-
s e
~+,-e w-m
.,
-,m,
-.e, vrv a
_ _
._
. _ _ _
-
.
-
.
'
g IM W4ilAPH C04TA!N! Smsty;35 WRim)04 A@ !$ ;tg g pgtg McLB!tmE,liisimy. gym LOT stAK 4.5 Proteeted Area and Iso,l_ation Zone Lighting - The inspectors conducted
--
-
ifgt ting survey of the & and isolation ze.es on February 12, 1991.
i Se i.spectors determined by observations tut the lighting was very
?.ffe>sive and consistent with the Plan requirnents.
No deficiencies h
ere notori.
4.6 Vital rea Barrters - The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of seli Re7 vitaDrea (VA) barriers on February 13, 1991.
The inspectc*s determined t/ observation that the barriers were installed
and mi cath'd as described in the Plan.
No deficiencies were notect.
i Vital A ea Detection Aids - The inspectors obserted and raquested test % 07 selec*ec VA detection aids and deternA ud that they were
%stallec, maintained and operated as committed tc ( r. the Plan.
No deficiencies were noted.
N N I M CONIM f$ [ N C i E ;,3 BRMilA1104 D.D l$ M M jyu E lBS M, IT li I M lik % n 1DT KAK 5.0 Protected ard Vital Area Access Centrol of Personnel Packaoes and Vehicles 5.) Perv.nel A2 cess Control The inspectors determined that'the U cex(at was e ~rcising positive control over personnel access to the PA ant VY s.
TbP determination was based on the follwing:
The insp/
's verified by observation that personnel are pr.operly
identifixd, ed authorizatior, is checked, prior to issuance of badges and Q) strds.
No daficiencies were noted.
'
The inspectors veified that the licensee has a program to
confirm the trustv.'ethiness and reliability of employees and contractor person" 1.
This program includes checks on employment, crecH and criminal history and a psychological e x ah. > n a t i on.
No de 'iciencies were notri.
!
_,..
.___.
_ - - _.- - - - - -. - _ - - _ _ - -
- - - -
- - - - - - - - -
-
-
l
.
.
The inspectors verified that ti e licensee takes precautions to
ensure that an unauthorized name cannot be added to the access list by having a member of management review tne list every 31 days. No deficiencies were noted.
The inspectors verified that the licensee has a search program,
as committed to in the Plan, for firearms, explosives, incendiary devices and other unauthorized materials.
The inspectors observed plant personnel and visitor access processing several times during the inspection and interviewed 50's and the licensee's security staff regarding personnel access procedures.
(See also Section 3.3)
The-inspectors determined by observations that individuals in
the PA and VA's display their badges as required.
The inspectors verified that the li,ensee has escort procedures
for visitm 5 to the PA and VA's.
N: deficiencies were noted.
The inspectors verified that the licensee has a mechanism for
expediting access to vital equipment during emergencies and thr,t the mechanism is adequate for its purpose. No deficiencies were noted.
5.2 Package and Material Access Control - The inspectors determined that the licensee was exercising positive control over packages and materials that are brought into the PA at the main access control portal.
The inspectors reviewed the package and material control procedures and found that they were consistent with commitments in the Plan. The inspectors also observed package and material processing and interviewed 50's and the licensee's security staff about package and material control procedures.
No deficiencies were identified.
5.3 Vehicle Access fontrol - The inspecters determined that the licensee properly controis access to and within the PA.
The inspectors verified that iehicles are properly processed prior to entering the PA. The process was consistent with commitments in the Plan.
The inspectors alsa reviewed the vehicle search prccedures and determined they were consistent with commitments in the Plan.
This deteruination was made by observing vehicle processing and search, inspection of vehicle logs, and by interviewing S0's and licensee's security staf f about vehicle processing and search procedure ~.
-.-
.
- - -.---.-
.- -
- -.
-
'?
j.
,
,
4
,
x
,
J-;
.
c
.
'[
g IB3 fat 48tAPli CORTES SMETEM
[
P HIFOl* Ail 0N DO IS Wii F0t PUBLR
'
"
SISClOSLTE, li 18 idIhTMALLY LEFTBLIR.
y
6.0 Alarm Station and Communications - The inspectors observed the operations d
,
of the.CentralfAlarm Station (CAS) and:the Secondary: Alarm Station (SAS)-
-and determined lthat they-were maintained andfoperated as committed to in
.
the Plan.
CAS:and SAS operators were interviewed by the inspectors and t
,
-
found to'be knowledgeable of their duties and ~ responsibilities. -The
. inspectors verified that the CAS and SAS do not contain any operational y
activities:that would interfere with-the assessment and response
functions, 1No deficiencies were neted.
7,0 Emeroency Power Supply'- The inspectors verified that there are several
',
-
systems:(batteries, dedicated diesel generator within_ a VA, and plant -
Lon-site:AC ;ower) that provide backup power to the' security systems.
The-t
. inspectors reviewed the test and maintenance records and procedures'for these. systems and_ found' that they were consistent with the Plan. ~ No.
deficiencies were noted;
,
J
8,0 ' Testing, Maintenarce and Compensatory Measures.The inspectors-reviewed
&
testing;and: maintenance reccrds and' confirmed the records committed to in
- 4 the Plan were on file and readily available-for' review, The security systems are maintained and repaired by. Instrumentation and Control (I&C)
staff' technicians,.However,, based on discussions with the licensee.and a JreviewLof I&C-records, the. Inspectors determined that, although the
_
M X
equipmentgrepairs~were being performedsinHaLtimely manner,'they wereinot J'
S
_being 'ef fectively --tracked.,Thellicensee committed to develop _:and _ implement aLmore' effective tracking method by June?l99L This tatter wil1 be-reviewed (duringfsubsequent inspections, dhe' inspectors also reviewed the licensee's use of-compensatory measures-
'
,
fandsdetermined them to be'as committed to intthe Plan, No deficiencies.
'
-
,
awere noted, j
a
'
&
l9,CT 5ecurity Trainino and Qualification:- During the inspection, several SO's x
_
' '
- were interviewed to determine.if.they possessed the requisite knowledge"
- .
and' ability to carry'out t_ heir assigned duties. The' interview results
3s a,
' 1'
indicated'that'they.were professional:and. knowledgeable of their job-OE j requirements as contained in ;the - formal 1 training program, No deficiencies y
were:noted.
a ji
-
L
,
w f
Y-l
. ':
- [;[ 'j g
-
- - -
_
l..
..
.-
The inspectors randomly selected and reviewed the training and qualification records for 7 S0's, including supervisory personnel.
Their physical and firearms qualification records were also inspected.
No deficiencies were noted.
However, during Inspection No. 50-244/90-21, the inspector determined, from interviewing the security training coordinator, that the training coordinator had no mechanism to incorporate lessons learned during program implementation into the formal lesson plans.
For example, lessons learned-were being incorporated into security procedures, but no changes were made to the lesson plans, although the training on lessons learned was being accomplished through on-the-job training.
During this inspection, the inspectors determined through a selected review of the contractor's lesson plans that revisions initiated due to lessons learned were being incorporated in the security procedures, but stili had not been included in the lesson plans.
The licensee stated that the revisions were being' accumulated and would be included in the lesson plans as soon as possible. At the completion of the inspection, the licensee informed the inspectors that all applicable lesson plans had been revised'
to reflect the changes made to the security procedures. Due to time constraints, the inspectors did not verify these changes in the lesson plans.
This matter will be reviewed during subsequent inspections.
10.0 Exit Intervie*, - The inspector met with the licensee representatives indicated iii faragraph 1 at the -~ nelusion of the inspection on February 15, 1991. At that time, the pu. ase and scope of the inspection'were reviewed acd theLfindings were presented.
The licensee's commitments, as documented in this report, were reviewed and confirmed with the licensee.
.