IR 05000213/1979001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-213/79-01 on 790109-11.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Followup on Previous Insp Findings,Review of Monthly Operating Repts & LER Received in District Office
ML19284A643
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 01/26/1979
From: Keimig R, Lazarus W, Mcnatt T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19284A641 List:
References
50-213-79-01, 50-213-79-1, NUDOCS 7903150141
Download: ML19284A643 (9)


Text

.

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

-

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No. 50-213/79-01 Docket No. 50-213'

,

License No. DPR-61 Priority Category C

--

Licensee:

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company P. O. Box 270

-

Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Facility Name:

Haddam Neck Plant Inspection at:

Haddam, Connecticut Inspection conducted: Januar' 9-11, 1979 Inspectors:

/

/

f W. J. La 6rus, Reactor Inspector 6 ate signed bw/

b

/f26/?.P u

T. G. Mdlatt, Reactor Infpector date signed date signed

//r 6 f79 Approved by-

V&

g. R. KeImig, Chief, Reactor Projects date signed Section No. 1, R0 & NS Branch Insoection Summary:

Inspection on January 9-11,1979 (Report Number 50-213/79-01)

Areas Inspected:

Routine, unannounced inspection by regional based inspectors of plant operations including shift logs and operating records and a tour of accessible areas; followup on previous inspection findings; review of monthly operating reports and Licensee Event Reports received in the RI office.

The inspection involved 26 inspector-hours on site by two regional based inspectors.

Results:

No items of noncompliance were identified.

.

Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)

700315 0 /Y/

-

-

.

,

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted

  • N. Burnett, Operations Supervisor J. Ferguson, Engineering Supervisor S. Fleming, Training Supervisor
  • R. Graves, Plant Superintendent J. Levine, Maintenance Supervisor
  • R. Traggio, Assistant Plant Superintendent The inspector also interviewed other plant personnel including shift operations, engineering staff, and administrative personnel.
  • denotes those present at the exit interview.

2.

Licensee Action on Previous Insoection Findings (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (213/77-07-01):

The licensee has trained auxiliary operators to inspect fer boric acid leaks during their tours of the plant and to submit a maintenance request for any leaks identified.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (213/77-08-01): The inspector reviewed the formal training program established to insure that operators, technicians, and mechanics are informed of pertinent LER informa-tion.

The program has been implemented and is acceptable.

(0 pen) Inspector Followup Item (213/77-11-02): The inspector reviewed a report received by the licensee which determined the cause of the pipe cracks in the boric acid system piping to be the result of chloride stress corrosion from the outside to the inside of the pipe. The affected piping has been replaced.

The licensee plans to submit an update to LER 77-4/lT.

(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (213/77-12-18): The inspector reviewed PORC minutes and interviewed PORC members to verify that revised procedures are reviewed by the PORC, as a group, prior to implementation.

No discrepancies were identified.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (213/77-18-06): The inspector verified that the hangers had been inspected by the licensee, that the track welds were intact and the one hanger with an uncorrect setting has been readjusted.

.

-

.

,

(Closed) Unresolved Item (213/77-18-08): The inspector verified that the modification involving replacement of the relief valves had been completed.

(0 pen) Unresolved Item (213/77-19-06): A PDCR to install air filters in the ventilation supply for the switchgear room has been approved. The modification should be completed during the upcoming refueling outage.

This item will be reviewed after completion of the modification.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (213/77-26-02):

The inspector verified that procedure N0P 2.1-1 had been revised to reflect modifications made to the Reactor Coolant System to prevent overpressurization.

(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (213/78-21-02): The inspector verified that the licensee met his conmitment to assign a third person to the plant training staff as stated in letter CYH 77-277 to RI dated September 23, 1977.

(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (213/78-24-02):

The inspector reviewed the revised Job Order form which now clearly provides for specifying the level of housekeeping / cleanliness to be main-tained for each maintenance activity.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (213/78-24-04):

The inspector verified that procedure E0P 3.1-4, " Loss of Coolant," Revision 5, had been revised to include operator action in the situation when the core cooling systems are not set for automatic initiation.

3.

Shift Logs and Operating Records a.

The inspector reviewed the following plant procedures to determine the licensee's established administrative require-ments in this area in preparation for a review of selected logs and records.

ADM 1.1-5, Control Room Operating Log, Original.

--

ADM 1.1-6, Plant Records Collection, Storage, Mainten-

--

ance and Disposition, Revision 5.

--

ADM 1.1-43, Control Room Area Limits for Control Opera-tors, Origina.

,

--

ADM 1.1-44, Shift Relief and Turnover, Original.

QA 1.2-2.4, Housekeeping Requirements, Revision 4.

--

SUR 5.1-102, Monthly Audit of Bypass and Jumper Log,

--

Revision 1.

QA 1.2-14.1, Bypass and Jumper Control, Revision 1,

--

March 26, 1975.

--

QA 1.2-14.2, Equipment Control (Locking and Tagging),

Revision 1, January 1, 1976.

QA 1.2-16.1, Plant Information Reports, Revision 4.

--

The inspector verified that these administrative controls were acceptable.

b.

Shift Logs and operating recorc., were reviewed to verify that:

Control Room log sheet entries are filled out and

--

initialed;

-

,

Auxiliary log sheets are filled out and initialed;

--

--

Shift Supervisor and Control Room log entries involving abnormal conditions provide sufficient detail to communi-cate equipment status, lockout status, correction, and restoration; Log Book reviews are being conducted by the staff;

--

--

Operating orders do not conflict with Technical Specifi-cation requirements;

--

Jumper (Bypass) log does not contain bypassing discrepancies with Technical Specification requirements;

" Plant Information Reports" confirm there are no violations

--

of Technical Specification reporting or LC0 requirements; and,

--

Logs and records were maintained in accordance with Technical Specifications and the procedures in 5.a abov.

c.

The review included discussions with licensee personnel and the following plant shift logs and operating records.

N0P 2.2-2, Log Sheets which consist of Control Room

--

Part 1 and Part 2, Primary Side Survaillance Form, Secondary Side Surveillance Form, and Radiation Moni-toring System Daily Log for the period of November 15 through December 31, 1978.

Control Room Log Book for the period December ~1,1978

--

through January 10, 1979.

Night Orders Book for the period November 12, 1978

--

through January 10, 1979.

--

Bypass and Jumper Control Log for the period November 15, 1978 through January 10, 1979.

Tagging Log for the period November 15, 1978 through

--

January 10, 1979.

Plant Information Reports (PIR) (PIR 78-109 through

--

78-131, less Nos. 113,118-120, and 126).

--

PORC Minutes 78-61 through 79-1.

No items of noncompliance were ~ identified.

4.

Plant Tour The inspector conducted an inspection tour of accessible areas of the plant, including the Control Room, Primary Auxiliary Building, Turbine Building, Spent Fuel Building, Switch Gear Room, Diesel Generator Rooms, HP Control Point, Cable Spreading Area, and yard areas.

Details and findings are noted below.

a.

Monitorir.g Instrumentation and Annunciators _

The following control board instrumentation was checked to verify that instrument operability requirements were met and that parameters indicated were within Technical Specifi-cation limits (where applicable).

--

Volume Control Tank (VCT) level

.

Pressurizer pressure

--

Pressurizer level

--

Rod Position Indication

--

--

Axial Offset Nuclear Instrument power level (compared to computer

--

CAL-3 power)

--

RCS Average temperature, AT, and inlet temperature PWST level

--

Containment pressure and temperature

--

Control board annunciators were observed for abnormal alarms each time the inspector was in the Control Room.

No items of noncompliance were identified and the reason for each existing alarm was satisfactorily resolved, b.

Radiation Controls Radiation Controls established by the licensee, including posting and controls established for radiation /high radiation areas, radiological surveys, condition of step-off pads, and the disposal of protective clothing were observed for confor-mance with the requirements of 10 CFR 20 and Technical Specifi-cations.

Except as noted below, no items of noncompliance were identified.

The inspector witnessed the installation of improved locked barriers for high radiation areas in the PAB. The installation was not complete prior to the end of the inspection and will be reviewed in a subsequent inspection (RI Report 50-213/78-27, detail 4.b).

c.

Plant Housekeeping Plant housekeeping conditions, including general cleanliness and storage of materials to prevent fire hazards, were observed in all areas toured to verify coaformance with QA 1.2-2.4,

" Housekeeping Requirements." No fire hazards were identified and general cleanliness was acceptabl.

.

d.

Fluid Leaks and Piping Vibration

'

Systems and equipment in all areas toured were observed for the existence of fluid leaks and abnormal piping vibration.

No abnormal conditions were identified.

e.

Pipe Hangers / Seismic Restraints Spring pipe hangers and hydraulic shock suppressors installed on various piping systems throughout the plant were observed for proper installation, orientation, position, and fluid levels as applicable.

No discrepancies were identified, f.

Emergency Power Availability The inspector verified that the four 480-volt buses were energized, both diesel generators were lined up for auto-matic actuation, off site power was available, and emergency batteries were operable by checking switch lineups and indications in the Control Room, Diesel Generator Rooms, and Switch Gear Room.

No items of noncompliance were identified.

g.

Equipment Caution Tags / Jumpers The inspector verified that the following tags were in place as indicated in the Tagout Log:

Clearance Nos. 1254-1 and 420-1 and 2.

The inspector also verified that all jumpers nissing from the jumper :abinet were accounted for in the Jumper and Bypass Log.

No discrepancies were identified.

h.

Selected Valve Positions By observation during the plant tour, the inspector verified that the following valves and associated locking devices were in the position required by Technical Specification 3.6 to insure the operability of core cooling systems.

SI - M0V-24 (RWST suction)

--

-

.

RH - MOV-21 (RWST-RHR suction)

--

SI-M0V-861A, B, C, and D (Loop injection valves)

--

RH-MOV-23 and 34 (Containment Spray valves)

--

HPSI and LPSI pumps lined up for auto start.

--

No items of noncompliance were identified.

1.

Licensee Plant Tours The licensee's policy and practice regarding plant tours have not changed since the previous inspection in this area.

No formal administrative requirements exist to specify frequency of tours by plant staff; however, it remains policy to conduct frequent tours to observe housekeeping and plant conditions.

j.

Control Room Manning Control Room manning was reviewed several times during the inspection to verify conformance with the requirements of Technical Specifications,10 CFR 50.54(k), and ADM 1.1-43.

No items of noncompliance were identified.

5.

In-Office Review of Licensee Event Reports (LER's)

The inspector reviewed LER's received in the RI office to verify that details of the event were clearly reported including the accuracy of the description of cause and adequacy of corrective action.

The inspector also determined whether further information was required from the licensee, whether generic implications were indicated, and whether the event warranted on site followup.

The following LER's were reviewed.

ETS 78-13, Loss of 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> fish impingement sample.

--

--

ETS 78-12, Rate of change of circulating water discharge exceeded.

ETS 78-11, Fish impingement overrun for October,1978.

--

".-

.

--

ETS 78-10, Anomalous radioactivity in the Connecticut River.

No items of noncompliance were identified. On site followup may be performed during the next environmental inspection.

6.

Refueling Outace Plans The inspector discussed plans for the upcoming refueling outage with the licensee and received a copy of the proposed schedule for the outage.

7.

In-Office Review of Monthly Operating Reports The inspector reviewed the licensee's Monthly Operating Report for November 1978 in the RI Office to verify that reporting requirements were met.

8.

Exit Interview The inspector held a management meeting at the conclusion of the inspection on January 11, 1979 (see Paragraph 1 for attendees)

to discess the scope and findings of the inspection as detailed in this report.