HBL-17-003, License Termination Plan Technical Basis Documents

License Termination Plan Technical Basis Documents

ML17194A827
Person / Time
Site:	Humboldt Bay
Issue date:	07/06/2017
From:	Sharp L Pacific Gas & Electric Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
HBL-17-003
Download: ML17194A827 (429)

Text

Pacific Gas .and Loren D. Sharp 735 Tank Farm Road Elecl.ric Company¢' Senior Director San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Nuclear Decommissioning .

Phone: 805595.6481 Email: LDSL@pge.com July 6, 2017 PG&E Letter HBL-17-003 U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Docket No. 50-133, License No. DPR-7 Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3 License Termination Plan Technical Basis Documents

Dear Commissioners and Staff:

On May 3, 2013, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) submitted PG&E Letter HBL-13-008, "Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3 License Termination Plan Supplemental Information." That letter included five technical basis documents (TBDs) to aid the NRC in its review of the License Termination Plan (LTP). One of the TBDs was titled "In Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS) as Applied to Scan Requirements in Support of Final Status Survey at HBPP," dated September 26, 2012.

Recently, PG&E discovered an instrument geometry error in the original ISOCS TBD. This error has been entered into the HBPP Corrective Action Program (CAP).

PG&E reviewed every field use of ISOCS for Final Status Survey and found that in no case did it affect the conclusion of the area meeting the clearance criteria. PG&E has corrected the error in the "In Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS) as Applied to Scan Requirements in Support of the Final Status Survey at HBPP," TBD. Revision 2 of the TBD is contained in Enclosure 1.

In addition, on August 13, 2014, PG&E submitted PG&E Letter HBL-14-015, "Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3 License Termination Plan, Revision 1." LTP Section 5.4.2.5.3, states that a TBD will be developed for the bulk assay system and

• submitted to the NRC prior to being used. The TBD, which is titled "Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System," has been developed and is contained in Enclosure 2. The TBD, however, was used and provided to NRC inspectors during the August 9-11, 2016 inspection, but not formally submitted. This oversight has been entered into the HBPP (CAP).

There are no new or revised regulatory commitments (as defined in NEI 99-04) made in this letter.

r--

1 Document Control Desk PG&E Letter HBL-17-003 July 6, 2017 Page2 If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. William Barley at (707) 444-0856. ,

oren D. Sharp Senior Director, Nuclear Dec mmissioning Enclosures cc: Kriss M. Kennedy, NRC Region IV Administrator John B. Hickman, NRC Project Manager HBPP Humboldt Distribution

Enclosure 1 PG&E Letter HBL-17-003 Technical Basis Document In Situ Object Counting System TM (ISOCS) as Applied to Scan Requirements in Support of the Final Status Survey at HBPP Revision 2

Nuclear Power Generation NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 Humboldt Bay REVISION 2 EFFEC DATE 6-19-17 Power Plant PAGE 1 of11 APPROVED BY TITLE IN SITU OBJECT CO UNTING SYSTEM' ORIGINAL SIGNED 6-15-17 (ISOCS) AS APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE DIRECTOR/PLANT MANAGER I DATE FINAL STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP HB NUCLEAR (Procedure Classification - Quality Related) 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This TBD is intended to cover the use of the Canberra ISOCS detector system as a scanning instrument for Final Status Surveys. This revision addresses SAPN 1425160 regarding a work group evaluation of a review of the Geometry Composer ISOCS Model used to determine investigation levels for Class 1 area scans.

2.0 DISCUSSION 2.1 The Canberra characterized High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detector will be used in conjunction with the Canberra Genie' software suite to achieve Final Status Survey (FSS) scans of building surfaces and land areas and possibly other media as deemed appropriate (e.g. piping systems). The !SOCS scanning technique achieves scan coverage over a defined area to set a-priori detection limits. These detection limits must be capable of detecting the investigation level to facilitate follow-up investigations where required.

2.2 System Description

Two !SOCS-characterized P-type HPGe detectors, manufactured by Canberra Industries, have been procured. As the project progresses, other !SOCS detectors (e.g. reverse electrode coaxial) may be employed. The key factor regarding the use of other ISOCS characterized detectors is that specific efficiency calibrations will be developed and evaluated to account for each detector's unique characteristics.

The HPGe detector is mounted on a bracket designed to hold the detector cryostat assembly and associated collimators. This bracket may be mounted in a cage-l ike frame.

This frame permits the detector to be oriented (pointed) over a full range from a horizontal to vertical orientation while being positioned above the surface being evaluated.

The InSpector (MCA) unit that drives the signal chain and the laptop computer that runs the acquisition software (Genie-2000) are mounted either in the frame or on a wheeled cart. These components are may be battery powered. Back-up power supplies (e.g.

inverter) may be used to support the duty cycle. A wireless network may also be installed so that the laptop computers used to run the systems can be controlled from remote laptop, eliminating the need for a direct cable connection between the operator's station and the ISOCS unit.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TITLE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL REVISION 2 STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP PAGE 2 ofll 2.3 LTP Chapter 5 Performance Criteria In the performance of required survey unit measurements, levels of radioactivity may be identified that warrant investigation. Depending on the results of the investigation, the survey unit may require no action, remediation, and/or reclassification and resurvey. In order to satisfy the requirements of the HBPP LTP (Ref 1), the scan sensitivity and coverage must be adequate to meet the dual specifications for coverage and investigation level as presented in Table 1 and Table 2.

• Table 1 Scan Survey Coverage Requirements I I Class 1 I Class 2 I Class 3 I Scan Coverage I 100% I 10-100 %* l Judllill.ental (1-10%)

• For Class 2 Survey Units, the amount of scan coverage will be proportional to the potential for finding areas of elevated activity or areas close to the release criterion in accordance with MARSSIM Section 5.5.3. Accordingly, HBPP will use historical information and the results of individual measurements collected during characterization to correlate this activity potential to scan coverage levels.

Table 2 Investigation Levels Classification Scan Investigation Levels Direct Investigation Levels

>DCGLEMc or >DCGLw and> a

>DCGLEMC statistical parameter-based Class I Value

>DCGLw or >MDCscAN if

>DCGLw Class 2 MDCscAN is greater than DCGLw Class 3 Detectable over Background >0.5DCGLw 2.4 Traditional Scan Methodologies Traditional gamma scan surveys have been performed with handheld instruments such as NaI(Tl) sci!ltillation detectors for gamma in potentially contaminated media or gas flow proportional probes when alpha/beta detection is desired.

Technicians will respond to all instrument indications of elevated activity while surveying.

Upon receiving an indication, the technician will stop and resurvey the last square meter of area surveyed to verify the increase. Technicians are cautioned, in training, about the importance of the verification survey and are given specific direction in the procedure as to survey extent and scan speed. If the indication is verified, the technician will mark the area with a flag or other appropriate means. Each area marked will be addressed in an investigation survey instruction prepared for the survey unit. The instruction will specify the required actions, such as a re-scan of the area, direct measurements, and collection of a soil sample (for land surveys). Each investigation will be evaluated and reported in the survey area report. (Investigation levels are shown in Table 2.)

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TI1LE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL REVISION 2 STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP PAGE 3 of11 With respect to Class 1 Survey Units, surveillance for elevated activity is performed via

• scan surveys using hand-held field instruments. Acceptance criteria (i.e. DCGLEMC) is derived by multiplying the DCGLw by the area factor associated with that area bounded by the grid used to locate soil samples. Occasionally, due to either background radioactivity or the size of the sample location grid, the detection sensitivity for these hand-held instruments exceeds the DCGLEMC* In such instances, the survey grid is reduced so that area factors yielding higher DCGLEMC values can be used. This approach has a side effect of additional sampling, which impacts project schedules and costs. Additional sampling is further experienced to distinguish between natural radioactivity and plant-derived radioactivity to investigate elevated instrument responses.

2.5 !SOCS Scan methodologies For the ISOCS scan method, the primary assumption made is that a potential one-square-meter of elevated radioactivity exists at the edge of the area being evaluated by a single in-situ measurement.

To account for detection (i.e. efficiency) radionuclide-specific investigation levels are developed. Since the investigation levels approximate the DCGLw, assay results below investigation level(s) satisfy both the DCGLw and DCGLEMC criteria.

The ability of ISO CS to perform radionuclide identification is also beneficial where influences from background radioactivity (e.g. ISFSI) impede survey efforts. Count times can be tailored to achieve required detection sensitivities and the detector can be collimated to minimize the influence from sources outside the detector's field of view.

2.6 Setup The ISOCS is most commonly deployed on its cart, a tripod or a crane to accommodate the physical requirements of various measurements. Power may be supplied by battery, AC line or generator. The decision regarding the selection of collimator configuration is determined by the engineer. In some cases it may be desirable to use a 180 degree collimator, taking advantage of exposing more of the detector's sensitive volume

. whenever background sources are at an insignificant level. Accordingly, it should be noted

. that such a design should be used in large Class 3 open land areas where the survey design requires a greater efficiency and field of view for optimal coverage and detection of discrete activity. It also.should be noted that scan survey designs of this nature should be such that the calibration ISOCS model generated incorporates a "95% Efficiency" model relative to the infinite plane efficiency for the most limiting radionuclide of concern.

• Data c.ollection to support FSS activities will be administered by a specific Survey Plan.

Survey Plans may include an index of measurement locations with associated spectrum filenames to ensure that all the required measurements are made and results appropriately managed. Personnel specifically trained to operate the system will perform data collection activities.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TI1LE IN SITU OBJECT COuNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL REVISION 2 STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP. PAGE 4 ofll Data collection activities will address environmental conditions that may impact soil moisture content. Logs shall be maintained so as to provide a mechanism to annotate such conditions to ensure that efficiency calibration files address the in-situ condition(s). In extreme cases (e.g. standing water, etc.) specific conditions will be addressed to ensure that analysis results reflect the conditions. As previously discussed with respect to water, when unique environmental conditions exist that may impact analysis results, conservative compensatory factors will be applied to the analysis of the data to the analysis of the data.

2. 7 Efficiency C~libration The central feature of the portable ISOCS technology is to support in-situ gamma spectroscopy via the application of mathematically derived efficiency calibrations. Due to the nature of the environment and surfaces being evaluated (assayed), input parameters for the ISOCS efficiency calibrations will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to ensure the applicability of the resultant efficiency. Material densities applied to efficiency calibrations will be documented. In practice, a single efficiency calibration file may be applied to the majority of the measurements.

The geometry most generally employed will be a circular plane assuming uniformly distributed activity. Efficiency calibrations will address a depth of 15 cm for soil and a depth up to 5 cm for concrete surfaces to account for activity embedded in cracks, etc.

Other geometries (e.g. exponential circular plane, rectangular plane, etc.) will be applied if warranted by the physical attributes of the area or surface being evaluated. Efficiency calibrations are developed by radiological engineers who have received training with respect to the ISOCS software. Efficiency calibrations will be documented in accordance with procedure C&RP B-20, "Modeling Counting Geometries for Final Status Surveys."

Attenuation by standing water will need to be modeled into the shot and carefully verified so as to not understate the depth. Experience has shown that it becomes difficult to meet detection limits with more than two inches of water in a scan shot. Damp soil should have a lower density than the default value of 1.6 g/cm3, thus it should not reduce the measured in 'situ activity of the soil. ,

2.8 Designing coverage

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TITLE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS REVISION 2 APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP PAGE 5ofll It is frequently desirable or required to ensure 100% scan coverage of a survey unit. This may be achieved through the use of a triangular grid pattern with positions determined using the Visual Sample Plan (VSP) software." For the purposes of this discussion, it is assumed that the 90 degree collimators are installe4 and that the detector face is orientated downward and is lifted to the desired height, h above the horizontal plane. The field of

• view of the detector is a circle of radius h. By geometric construction, the maximum horizontal distance L, between the scan shots becomes:

Equation 1 L=-Jl*ll Where, L is the triangular grid spacing; and h is the vertical height of the detector To use VSP to design a triangular grid pattern for a given survey unit, we recommend using a random start point. The current version (v. 6.2d) of the VSP software requires the number of desired samples N, be used as Samples desired, N be input to establish a triangular grid with a random start point of appropriate grid spacing. This input may be determined by using the familiar' triangular grid equation from the MARSSIM:

Equation 2 Or, stated more purely; Equation 3 L=

Thus Using Equations 1and3:

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TI1LE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL REVISION 2 STATUS SURVEY ATHBPP PAGE 6 ofll Thus, A

3h2 = - - -

N* -J3 2

Solving for N, Equation 4 A

N=----

3h2 * -J3 2

It is recommended that N+ 1 be input into the VSP run to ensure a slight additional overlap for conservative margin. As shown in Figure 1, once the triangular grid is constructed it will be necessary to verify that 100% of the area is covered by plotting the scan measurement locations and the field of view for each measurement in a drafting program such as AutoCAD. Additional scan shots on the periphery of the survey unit may be readily added by plotting additional measurement locations using the sample points al_ong the triangular grid. The manually added scan shot locations are shown in red.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TITLE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS REVISION 2 APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP PAGE 7 ofll Figure 1- Using VSP for plotting ISOCS scan locations 3.0 HBPP Required Detection levels 3.1 Class 1 Survey units As noted earlier, the primary assumption made is that a potential one-square-meter of elevated radioactivity exists at the edge of the area being evaluated by a single in-situ measurement. In order to determine the required scan MDC one needs to determine the DCGLEMCfor this hypothetical case. Tables 3 and 4 present the DCGLEMC scan requirement for Class l Areas for the primary nuclides of concern Cs-137 and Co-60.

Table 3 Soil Values Nuclide DCGLw (pCi/g) Area Factor DCGLEMC (pCi/g)

(lm 2)

Cs-137 7.9 14 110 Co-60 3.8 10 38.0 Table 4 Surface Values 2 2 Nuclide DCGLw (dpm/100 cm ) Area Factor DCGLEMC (dpm/100 cm )

(lm2)

Cs-137 4.6E4 13 5.98 E5 Co-60 1.3 E4 15 1.95 E5 3.2 Discussion of Calculation of Class 1 Effective Investigation Levels for ISOCS

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TITLE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL REVISION 2 STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP PAGE 8of11 For calculation of an effective investigation ISOCS scan value for each radionuclide of concern above for Class 1 areas, it is important to note that the very conservative (worst case) assumption that an elevated 1~2 area is present at the DCGLEMC on the edge of the detector's field of view (12.6 m 2). As the ISOCS system is only sensitive to gamma photons that interact within the active detector volume, moving a homogenous source term in a lm2 circular plane offset approximately 1.44 mto reflect its location on the edge of the field of view, the source term activity appears as more of an isotropic point source, with activity falling off as a function of two phenomenon: the inverse square law, and to a smaller degree source directionality (angular dependency) relative to the active detector volume. For a collimated system used above, another factor that reduces the efficiency for a point source offset at the edge of the field of view is the masking (shielding effect) of a significant portion of the detector volume by the lead collimator. To account for these effects, a calculation of the "effective" investigation level must be performed. The key parameters used for the effective investigation calculation involve comparing the efficiency for a circular plane modeled for a 2 m detector field surface height fitted with a 90 degree lead collimator (12.6 m 2 field of view), with the efficiency for a lm2 circular plane at the same height above the surface but offset to the edge of the 2 m diameter field of view. The ISOCS Geometry Composer Rt;ports and associated model calibration efficiencies are provided in Attachment 2, with a summary of the results provided in Table 5:

Table 5 Investigation Levels lm2

• 1m2 Line* 12.6 m 2 Nuclide Line Adjustment Derived*

Energy DCGLEMC Efficiency13 Line Factorc .* hivestigation ~**

.*.

• A (keV) ,, (pC1/g} .modeled . ',

with2

. ~f~ciency13 , .. . Level.*. , .*

anJ.44m I ,,., '(p.',c,., iig)~ ' '

.* ***~. ': ':6ffset * ' , :*,***c, Cs-137 661.7 110 4.31E-01 6.68E+OO 6.46E-02 7.14E+OO Co-60 1332.5 38 3.64E-01 5.47E+OO 6.65E-02 2.53E+OO Note A: lm soil DCGLEMC = DCGLw

• AF from Table 3 above 2

Note B: Line Efficiencies provided from Geometry Composer and !SOCS Calibration Reports provided in Attachment 2.

Note C: Adjustment factor= (1 m2 efficiency/12.6 m2 efficiency)

Note D: Derived Investigation Level = lm2 DCGLEMC

• Adjustment factor It should be noted that a soil density of 1.6 grams/cubic centimeter (g/cm3) was used for the two geometries modeled above as it is the a reasonable density given the densities typically encountered from dry soils sampled at HBPP.

3.3 Class 2 Survey Units Since the investigation Level for Class 2 Survey units is given from Table 2 as:

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TI1LE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS. IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL REVISION 2 STATUS SURVEY ATHBPP PAGE 9ofll

>DCGLw or >MDCscAN if MDCscAN is greater than DCGLw This requirement is met by setting detection limits such that:

>DCGLw in a 1 m2 area at the edge of the field of view may be detected.

3.4 Class 3 Survey Units Since the fr1vestigation Level for Class 3 Survey units is given from Table 2 as:

Detectable over background.

This requirement is met by investigating any scan that positively detects activity in excess of the site assessed soil background level of 0.1 pCi/g Cs-137 as provided in TBD-200, "Site Background Levels of Cs-137" (Ref. 8).

Attachment 1 provides a site specific ISOCS run that demonstrates the scan detection limits that may be met for varying count times.

4.0 LIMITATIONS The use of the in-situ techniques should be limited to characterized HPGe detectors utilizing appropriate geometries and will be used in conjunction with the Canberra Genie' software suite.

All operations should be conducted in accordance with applicable site procedures.

Additionally, the following condition must be satisfied:

• The geometries must be reviewed by a Subject Matter Expert (SME) to ensure they are correctly developed and accurate or conservative approximations of the media being measured.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TI1LE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS REVISION 2 APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP 1 PAGE lOofll

5.0 CONCLUSION

Caution needs to be used in the application of geometries for ISOCS scanning. Careful verification that the environmental c~nditions and geometric arrangement are appropriate to the detector geometry is pivotal to ensuring the accuracy of the results.

Field conditions may also sigi:iificantly influence the practical applicability of the ISOCS as a field instrument. Experience has shown that the impact of attenuation from standing water may be particularly problematic in achieving the required detection sensitivity. Consequently, it is recommended that standing water be avoided to the extent practical and sufficient counting times are planned for where it is impractical to eliminate. \

'-* The ISOCS methodology presented has been demonstrated as an acceptable means for achieving survey scan objectives; provided that proper care is taken to ensure that the results are valid. --

6.0 REFERENCES

\

6.1 NUREG- 1575, MARSSIM "Multi-Agency Radiation Site Survey and Investigation Manual", Rev 1, August, 2000.

6.2 HBPP License Termination Plan DRAFT (May 2012) 6.3 ENG-HB-003 "Humboldt Bay Soil Derived Concentration Guideline Levels", Rev 0, 2-29-12

' 6.4 ENG-HB-004 "Humboldt Bay Building Surface Derived Concentration Guideline Levels,

Rev 0, 2-29-12.

6.5 ENG-HB-005 "Area Factors for Use with Humboldt Bay Soil DCGLs", Rev 0, 3:.02-12.

6.6 ENG-HB-006 "Area Factors for Use with Humboldt Bay Building Surface DCGLs", Rev 0, 3-02-12.

6.7 C&RP B-9 Vol. 8, Rev 0, "OPERATION OF THE GENIE-2000 GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY SYSTEM" 6.8 TBD-200,"Site Background Levels of Cs-137", Rev 3, 7106106

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-402 VOLUME 12 TITLE IN SITU OBJECT COUNTING SYSTEM' (ISOCS) AS REVISION 2 APPLIED TO SCAN REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY AT HBPP PAGE 11 ofll 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 7.1 Demonstration of Achieving Required Detection Limits for Soils in a I 0 Minute Count Interval 7.2 Geometry Composer and !SOCS Calibration Results Reports 8.0 RECORDS None 9.0 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION Site Closure I -

• Attachment 1 Attachment 1 Demonstration of Achieving Required Detection Limits for Soils in a 10 Minute Count Interval TBD-402 Page 1 of7

Attachment 1

~**~*********************************************************************

• w-;..**1<-;,__'>1* ' GAMMA S P E C T R U M ANAI,YSIS Detector SN 3920 Report Generated On 5/22/2012 11: 38: 36 AM Sample Identification Det 3920 Sample Title 2m LLD, FOV 12m Sample Information Sample Type Sample Geometry Peak Locate 'fhreshold 3.00

!.>eak Locate Range (in channels} 100 - 4096 Peak Area Range {in channels) 100 - 4096 Identification Energy Tolerance 1.000 keV Sample Size 1. OOOE+OOO g Sample Taken On 5/17/2012 11: 51: 00 AM Acquisition Started 5/17/2012 11: 51 :22 AM Live Time 600.0 seconds Real 'I'ime 601. 0 seconds Dead Time 0.16 %:

Energy Calibration Used Done On 0/4/2011 Efficiency Calibration Used Done On 8/17/2011 Efficiency ID. 2m Soil Sm Shld TEST DATA ONLY FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES Date:_ _ _ N_l_A___

NIA NIA Reviewed by TBD-402 Page 2 of?

Attachment 1 Peak Locate Analysis Report 5/22/2012 11:38:37 AM Page 2

• • • • • P E A K L 0 C A,T E REPORT *****

Detector Name: SN 3920 Sample

Title:

2m-LLD, FOV 12m Peak Locate Performed on: 5/22/2012 11:38:36 AM Peak Locate From Channel: 100 Peak Locate To Channel: 4096 Peak Search Sensitivity: 3.00 Peak Centroid Centroid' Energy Peak No. Channel Uncertainty (keV) Significance 1 1165.13 0.3892 582.85 3.09 2 2921.16 0.2137 1460.66 7.89

? = Adjacent peak noted Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma TBD-402 Page 3 of7

Attachment 1 PeaK Analysis Report

• I I 5/22/2012 11:38:37 AM Page 3

• • • • • P E A K A NA L YS I S REPORT *****

Detector Name: SN 3920 Sample

Title:

2m LLD, FOV 12m Peak Analysis Performed on: 5/22/2012 11:38:36 AM Peak Analysis From Channel: 100 Peak Analysis To Channel: 4096 Peak ROI ROI Peak Energy FWHM Net Peak Net Area Continuum No. start end centroid {keV) {keV) Area Uncert. Counts 1 1162- 1169 1165.13* 582.85 1.25 1. 08E+001 7.10 1.62E+001 2 2915- 2928 2921.16 1460.66 1. 54 1. 71E+002 13.37 3.04E+OOO M First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma TBD-402 Page4 of7

Attachment 1 Nucliae Identification ~eport 5/22/2012 11:38:37 AM Page 4

• • • • • N U C L I D E I D E N T I F I C A T I 0 N R E P 0 R T *****

Sample

Title:

2m LLD, FOV 12m Nuclide Library Used: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILES\HBPP.NLB

• e t t t t I t t t t t t I I e I I t t IDENTIFIED NUCLIDES t t t t t t t I t t t I I t t t t I t I Nuclide Id Energy Yield Activity Activity Name Confidence {keV) (%) {pCi/g ) Uncertainty K-40 0.996 1460.81* 10. 67 1.374E+001 1. 207E+OOO Tl-208 0.688 277.35 6.80 583.14* 84.20 8.342E-002 5.491E-002 860.37 12. 46

• = Energy line found in the spectrum.

Energy Tolerance : +.ooo kev Nuclide confidence index threshold 0.30 Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma

• • • • • • • • • • UN I DE N T I F I E D PE AK S **********

Peak Locate Performed on: 5/22/2012 11:38:36 AM Peak Locate From Channel: 100 Peak Locate To Channel: 4096 Peak Energy Peak Size in Peak CPS Peak Tol.

No. {keV) Counts per Second  % Uncertainty Type Nuclide All peaks were identified, M = First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma TBD-402 Page 5 of7

Attachment 1 Nut:lille MDA Report 5/22/2012. 11:38:37 AM Page 5

• • • • • N U C L I D E MDA R E P 0 R T *****

Detector Name: SN 3920 Sample Geometry:

Sample

Title:

2m LLD, FOV 12m Nuclide Library Used: G:\GENIE2K\CAMFILES\HBPP.NLB Nuclide Energy Yield Line MDA Nuclide MDA Activity Name (keV) (%) (pCi/g ) (pCi/g ) (pCi/g )

.+ K-40 1460.81* 10.67 9.5472E-001 9.55E-001 1.3739E+001 Co-60 1173.22 100.00 1. 8273E-001 1.83E-001 -6.5896E-092 1332.49 100.00 1. 9793E-001 4.5600E-002 Nb-94 702.63 100.00 1. 7495E-001 1.68E-001 -4.7263E-002 871.10 100.00 1. 6800E-001 -1.4617E-002 Ag-108m 79.20 7.10 1.1801E+001 2.19E-001 -1.2975E+OOO 433.93 89.90 2.2376E-001 -9.2283E-002 614.37 90.40 2.4723E-001 -2.0506E-001 722.95 90.50 2.1874E-001 9.1741E-002 Cs-134 569.31 15.43 1. 4419E+000 2.21E-001 -3.6585E-001 604.70 97.60 2.2080E-001 -3.2585E-002 795.84 85.40 2.6160E-001 -1. 2721E-002 Cs-137 661.65 85.12 2.9969E-001 3.00E-001 2.7738E-001 Eu-152 121. 78 28.40 1.3258E+OOO 7.lOE-001 1.1491E-002 244.69 7.49 3.3434E+OOO 9.8786E-001 344.27 26.50 7.0956E-001 ~6.ll33E-001 778.89 12.74 1. 5412E+OOO -3.6755E-001 867.32 4.16 4.7168E+OOO -1.0484E+OOO 964.01 14.40 1.5175E+OOO -1.3070E-001 1085.78 10.00 2.0568E+OOO -3.6315E-001 1112.02 13.30 1.6850E+OOO -9.5302E-001 1407.95 20.70 8.4534E-001 3.5688E-001 Eu-154 123.07 40.50 9.1728E-001 5.15E-0Ql 3.5029E-001 247.94 6.60 3.7264E+OOO -9.5294E-001 723.30 19.70 1. 0339E+OOO 6.8229E-001 873.19 11. 50 1. 4954E+OOO -7.4302E-001 996.32 10.30 l.5732E+OOO -5.1660E-001 1004.76 17.90 ' 9. 7848E-001 -1.1725E-001 1274.45 35.50 5.1461E-001 2.8913E-001 Eu-155 105.31 20.70 2.0415E+000 2.04E+OOO -1.3835E-001 Pb-206 803.10 100.00 2.1576E-001 2.16E-001 6.0968E-002 Ac-228 338.32 11. 40 1.8988E+000 8.49E-001 9.8160E-001 911. 07 27.70 8.4911E-001 5.6391E-001 969.11 16.60 1. 337 OE+OOO '7.3501E-001 Th-234 63.29 3.80 4.5458E+001 1.08E+001 2.9680E+001 92.59 5.41 1.083J!E+001 4.3335E+OOO U-235 143.76 10.50 3.0022E+OOO 4.98E-,001 1.5837E-001 163.35 4.70 6.1955E+000 5.0275E-001 185.72 54.00 4.9762E-001 -2.0189E-001 205.31 4.70 4.8387E+OOO -5.0339E+000 Np-237 311. 98 38.60 5.9409E-001 5.94E-001 1.3611E-001 Am-241 59.54 35.90 6.0109E+OOO 6.0lE+OOO -2.1662E+OOO TBD-402 Page 6 of7

Attachment 1 Nuclide MDA Report 5/22/2012 11:38:37 AM Page 6

. ' ' I Nuclide Energy Yield Line MDA Nuclide MDA Activity Name (keV) ( %) (pCi/g ) (pCi/g ) (pCi/g )

+ = Nuclide identified during the nuclide identification

• Energy line found in the spectrum

> Calculated MDA is zero due to zero counts in the region or the region is outside the spectrum

@ Half-life too short to be able to perform the decay correction TBD-402 Page 7 of?

Attachment 2 Attachment 2 Geometry Composer and ISOCS Calibration Results Reports TBD-402 Page 1 of 10

Attachment 2 A

Geometry Composer Report CANBERRA

.Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 09:58:45

~escription: 2m Soil, Sm Collimator (_ 1CJ. /VI p ci II) .

Comment: 2m Soil, Sm Collimator File Name: C:\GENIE2K\lsocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR,_PLANE\2m Soll, Sm Colllmator.geo Software: ISO CS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 3920 Collimator: 25mm-90d old (oldISOCS 25mm side 90deg colllmation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 60 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 80%

Integration: =

Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm) 1 Side Walls 2 Layer 1 3 layer2 4 Layer3 0 5 Layer4 0 6 Layer 5 0 7 layer6 0 B Layer 7 0 9 Layers 0 10 Layer9 0 11 Layer 10 0 12 Absorber 1 13 Absorber 2 14 Source - Detector

• 200 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 10.0 20.0 ~n ~n ~o ~5 60.0 61.0 70.0 80.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 600.0 660.0 661.7 662.0 663.0 800.0 1000.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1331.0 1332.5 1333.0 1500.0 2500.0 y

t'k_-__

/ z x

14.J rl

[1 copy*

A TBD-402 Page 2of10

Attachment 2 Geometry Composer Report A

CANBERRA

-_Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 09:58:45

(

Description:

2m Soll, Sm Collimator Comment: 2m Soll, Sm Collimator File Name: C:\GENIE2K\lsocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR._PLANE\2m Soil, Sm Collimator.geo Software: ISO CS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

.. r * -.. *, - ...

. : : . . : . ..: . . . .:. .. :.. . :. .. ~. :*.. :.*..* ~- :. . . ~ . . .

.=::. *.. _.:*--..:**. *-.**.*: .. : *- .

'*.. :-=.<:-: *::_ ... :.~._*< .... -.<.::: .* *:* . *. ': ..... * ..

• . * * . *:i*i***'*

. . :;- : *;* .>*~- -~

. *... : . :": ...:  :. ~

\-,.= =* . .* .

• _. 1*.

TBD-402 Page 3of10

Attachment 2 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\2m Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 08/17/11 09:37:46 Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\2m Soil Sm .CAL G,,..*.,ie Oal Time: 08/17/11 10:04:05 - -

i

' .plate: CIRCULAR PLANE Geom

Description:

2m Soil Sm Shld Comment: ISOCS:UNITS=ACT/G 2M_SOIL,_SM_COLLIMATOR Detector: 3920 Collimator: 25MM-90D OLD Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 1.2566e+001 (C)

~ass [Grams]: 3.0159e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty  %.Convergence Final # of Voxels

( X Mass) 10.00 4.98337e-020 20.0 0.765830 27220 20.DO l.62725e-015 20.0 30.00 0.022777 872925 2.82366e-006 20.0 -0. 086117 45.00 5.68310e-002 218225 15.0 0.228611 436465 58.00 8.40232e-001 10.0 59.54 -0.242875 6775 l.03257e+OOO 10.0 -0.298996 60.00 l.09605e+OOO 6775 10.0 -0.303913 6775

61. 00 1.20881e+OOO 10.0 -0.333334 6775 70.00 2.50849e-h000 10.0 I -0.464690 6775 80.00 4.26787e+OOO 10.0 -0.556374 100.00 6.95166e+OOO 6775 10.0 -0.516969 6775 50.00 9.65846e+OOO 10.0

~DD.OD

-0.548414 6775 9.86728e+OOO 8.0 -0.530546 300.00 8.84319e+OOO 6775 8.0 -0.350321 6775 400.00 7.88400e+OOO 8.0 600', 00 -0.213358 6775 6.88428e+OOO 6.0 -0.091989 660.00 6.69235e+OOO 6775 6.0 -0.073433 6775 661.65 6.68068e+OOO 6.0 -0.071660 662.00 6.69778e+OOO 6775 6.0 -0.071590 6775 663.00 6.67896e+OOO 6.0 -0.071649 6775 800.00 6.31889e+OOO 6.0 -0.066937 1000.00 5.91949e+OOO 6775 1172.00 5.66953e+OOO 4.0 -o. 071232 6775 4.0 -0.064342 6775 1173.22 5.6665le+OOO 4.0 -0.062582 1174.00 5.66395e+OOO 6775 4.0 -0.063173 6775 L331.00 5.46725e+OOO 4.0 -0.046045 6775 L332.49 5.46833e+OOO 4.0 -0.041743 6775 1333.00 5.46025e+OOO 4.0 -0.041392 1500. 00 5.19425e+OOO 6775 4.0 -0.042582 6775

~500.00 3.99988e+OOO 4.0 -0.044001 6775 TBD-402 Page 4of10

Attachment 2

( Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve

,. m Measured - - Calculated j.

\

Q-lllW'--~~~~~~+-~~~~~~~1---~~~~~~--l~~~~~~~--l~~~~~~~---l 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: SN_3920

/

TBD-402 Page 5of10

Attachment 2

( Interpolated Efficiency Calibratlon Curve J m Measured - - Calculated j 10 1

0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1e-005 1e-006 1e-007 1e-008 1e-009 1e-010 1e-011 1e-012 1e-013 1e-014 1e-015 1e-017 1e-018 1e-019 1e~020 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: SN_3920 TBD-402 Page 6of10

Attachment 2 A l

-1 I

Geometry*composer*Report CANBERRA .. . I Date: Wednesday, November 23; 2016 - 09:34:16

==

Description:==

3920 2m Soil (12mFOV) lm on o/s edge of FOV Sm CollimatorDl.6 Comment: Calib. Date 11/23/16 File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Siti.J\GRCULAR_P1.ANE\3920 12m FOV lm Soil Sm Col.geo Software: ISO CS Template: GRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: Det_3920 Collimator: 25mm-90d old (oldISOCS 25mm side 90deg collimation [large hole*collimator])

Environment: = =

Temperature 60 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity 80% =

Integration: = =

Convergence 1.00%, MDRPN 24 (16), CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (cm) 1 Side Walls 0 113 .. none 2 Layer 1 15 dirt2 1.6 i.oo I 3 Layer 2 0 <none>

4 Layer3 0 <none>

s Layer4 0 <none> I 6 Layer 5 0 <none>

7 Layer 6 0 <none>

B Layer 7 0 <none>

9 Layer B 0 .. .'

<none>

10 Layer9 0 <hone>

11 Layer 10 0 <none>

12 Absorber!

13 Absorber2 14 Source-Detector 200 144 0 144 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 45.0 58.0 59.5 60.0 61.0 70.0 80.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 600.0 660.0 661.7 662;0 663.0 800.0 1000.0 1172~0 1173.2 1174.0 1331.0 1332.5 1333.0 1500.0 2500.0 y

t. ,- x k.*:_~z

---

~~

• / Refcrnnco ~

.* Plane J I I  :

( :R j_,_,-~

i A ,~//J'

---

'-*~1 1.2 lnsid11. diomuier \ ..... - /'*

t------©-.-0--14.1 ,...,

14.3 14.r-? 0 o;roctlon

-r-- e Convention i1.s '~ /J

~  ;:O~aD ,,~.9-~;.1?-

d. 'f1c14M~ 11 *.;1,q./(;t; TBD-402 Page 7of10

Attachment 2 A

Geometry Composer Report CANBERRA Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 - 09:34:16

==

Description:==

3920 2m Soil (12mFOV) lm on o/s edge of FOV Sm Collimator Dl.6 Comment: Calib. Date 11/23/16 File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\ORCULAR_PLANE\3920 12m FOV lm Soil Sm Col.gee Software: I SOCS Template: ORCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) y r * ... x TBD-402 Page 8of10

Attachment 2 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\3920j 12r ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11(23/16 09:34:04 i Genie Cal File: C: \GENIE2K\CALFILES\Old Calib\3920 12m FOV lm SC dl. 6.CAL I Genie Cal Time: 11/23/16 09:43:19 Template: CIRCULAR PLANE Geom

Description:

2M Soil lM Dl.6 Comment: ISOCS:UNITS=ACT/G CALIB. DATE 11/23/16 Detector: DET 3920 Collimator: 25MM-90D OLD Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 1.0029e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.4069e+005 (C)

Length [Meters]: no~ used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS

_(U) = Value modified by us.er Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels

( X Mass) 45.00 3.31096e-003 15.0 0.010437 128670 58.00 5.. 3.2072e-002 10.0 -Q.010192 1.28670 59.54 6.58330e-002 10.0 -0.010398 128670 60.00 7.00307e-002 10.0 -0.01*0589 128670

61. 00 7.75108e-002 10.0 -0.010872 128670 70.00 1.65132e-001 10.0 -0.758796 8090 80.00 .2. 8 4 960e-ci 01 10. 0 -0.612222 8090 100.00 4.70226e-001 10.0 -0.455607 8090 150. 00 6.46712e-001 10.0 -0.342978 809.0 200.00 6. 525.64e-001 8.0 -0.297887 8090 300.00 5.74178e-001 8.0 ~0.253011 8090 400.00 5. 09197e-001 8.0 -0.113870 4070 600.00 4. 43596e.-001 6.0 -0.099499 4070 660

• 00 I 4.31935e-001 6.0 -0.098339 4070 661. 65 4.31341e'-001 6.0 -0.098689 4.070 662.00 4.32450e-001 6.0 -0.098686 4070 663.00 4.31422e-001 6.0 -0.099303 4070 800.00 4.114lle-001 6.0 -0.098225 4070 1000.00 3.89338e-001 4.0 -0*. 097886 4070 1172.00 3.75662e-001 4.0 -0.093654 4070 1173. 22 3.75139e'-001 4.0 -0.093216 4070 1174.00 3.74978e-001 4.0 -0.092434 4070 1331 .. 00 3.64003e-001 4.0 -o. o87e73 -- 4070 1332.49 3.63656e-001 4.0 -o. 087118 4070 1333.00 3.62819e-001 4.0 -0.086902 4070 15.00.00 3.47333e-001 4.0 -0.081391 4070 2500.00 2.71472e-001 4.0 -0.055561 4070 TBD-402 Page 9of10

Attachment 2 Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve

~-*_ _Meas_ur_ed_ _ _ _ ca_1cu

_ lated \

0 . 7 ~--+--+------------------- -- -

i.

I I i.

_u__l-----4----------1 0.6 t -

l r 0.5 j l

• I ff 0.4 +--------+---*-~ff----.'-----

03h - - .

I 0.2 +-* -,--- ______ _.._________________

1-0.1 t- .- - - - - - ' - ,- - - - - - - + - - - - -

• o~o

--__J~~~_,__~~-+--

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: SN_3920 TBD-402 Page 10of10

Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter HBL-17-003 Technical Basis Document Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System

Nuclear Power Generation NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 Humboldt Bay REVISION 1 EFFEC DATE 6-19-17 Power Plant PAGE lof30 APPROVED BY TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, ORIGINAL SIGNED 6-15-17 CALIBRATION, AND OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY DIRECTOR/PLANT MANAGER I DATE SYSTEM HB NUCLEAR (Procedure Classification - Quality Related) 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This document presents a large vo lume assay system and its potential application as a bulk material survey system in support of decommissioning of the Humboldt Bay Power Plant (HBPP) site. GARDIAN, which stands for GAmma Radiation Detection and In-container ANalysis, is a large container assay system designed to determine the radioactive material content in large containers or other simi lar volumes of waste. The system includes the capability of monitoring truck-mounted loads of waste or material (e.g., ro ll-offs, intermodals, sealands, etc.) and other containerized waste volumes (e.g., 55-gallon drums, B-12 or B-25 boxes, etc.)

The first field use of GARD IAN was during the Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant decommissioning project. Specific setup and calibration data used for the Big Rock Point project are included in thi s document as examples of typical evaluations/calibrations that can be performed with GARDIAN.

2.0 DISCUSSION 2.1 The Energy Solution GARDIAN Mobile Assay System consists of two semi-trailers positioned in a parallel configuration (see Figure 9.1). Truck or trailer-mounted containers/waste (e.g. , ro ll-off containers or intermodals) or other similar waste volumes are processed through the system by slowly moving the container/waste between the two trailers. The survey/assay of the material in the containers is monitored by a combination of plastic scintillation detectors and high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors. The plastic scintillation detectors (one per trailer) are mounted on the inboard ends of the trailers (see Figure 9 .1) to perform a gross scan survey of the container/waste as it is moved into position between the trailers. The scan survey ensures that sign ifi cantly elevated or highly non-uniform radioactivity is not present in the container (a pass/fail survey).

At the end of the scan survey, the container is positioned at a designated position between the trailers to allow the HPGe detectors (two per trailer) to conduct a qualitative and quantitative nondestructive assay of the waste. The HPGe detectors are pre-positioned for each large container type/configuration to optimize coverage of the containerized waste during the count as illustrated by Figure 9.2. The HPGe detectors are controlled by state-of-the-art nuclear instrumentation modul e (NIM) electronics, or equivalent, interfaced to a multi-channel analyzer that is contro lled by an IBM-compatible computer system.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 2 of30 The combination of detector types, and both scan and fixed position counting ensure that the radioactivity content of each surveyed container or item is effectively measured. This allows proper characterization of the radioactivity content or verification of its absence to allow release of the waste/material as allowed by approved release limits and protocols.

The GARDIAN system also includes the capability to assay waste or material in conventional containers (e.g., 55-gallon drums, B-12 or B-25 boxes, etc.). In this mode of operation, the system's conveyor and platform are used with the Main Assay Trailer to move and position containers in designated counting positions as appropriate for the given container (see Figure 9.3). The detectors are rotated inward to allow a detector view on each side of the box or container. Alternatively, all four system detectors may be used (as shown in Figures 9.3) if greater coverage of the container is desired. Multiple counting positions may be pre-programmed based on the desired number of measurements and locations using the system's PLC control unit and measurement control software.

The GARD IAN system is controlled using Canberra Industries Genie-2000/NDA-2000 software. Genie-2000 is the basic gamma spectroscopy software and NDA-2000 (Non-Destructive Assay) is supplemental software designed to facilitate the use of gamma spectroscopy in waste assay applications. NDA-2000 allows various counters, count types, containers, and geometries to be defined. Quality control features (e.g., control and trending of source checks and background checks) are also included with the Genie-2000/NDA-2000 software to ensure proper operation of the system prior to use.

Calibration curves for the various geometries established for GARDIAN are created using Canberra's ISOCS (In-Situ Object Counting System) software. ISOCS, in conjunction with a specific characterization of the system's detectors, allow detector efficiencies to be mathematically determined and applied to counting results. This calibration method is especially useful and necessary for large geometries where construction of large calibration sources or phantoms is not practical.

All operations includingthe calibration and routine counting of the GARDIAN system are controlled by specific procedures. TBD-GC-003 (Reference 8.1) and TBD-GC-001 (Reference 8.2) have been developed to ensure proper calibration, operation and maintenance of the system. Unit 3 exterior surfaces are relatively clean in terms of hazardous materials and radiological contamination; however, as surfaces are disturbed

• and Systems, Structures, and Components (SSC) configuration changes during D&D, radiological hazards have decreased as components are removed and disposed. Facility configuration is managed using the design change process under and HBAP C-1.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 3of30 Alpha emission from transuranic elements dispersed throughout structures, systems, and components (SSC) is the primary radiological concern during D&D. Decommissioning Accident Analysis, "Dry Active Waste (DAW) Fire" (Cale NX-323) results indicate the dose acceptance criteria in 10CFR20 would be met in a postulated fire with the bounding conditions for DAW stated as Precautions and Instruction in procedure RCP-61, "Collection, Labeling, Packaging, Storage, and Accountability of Radioactive Material."

Any postulated fire in the Environmental Count Room Building is enveloped by this analysis.

3.0 SYSTEM DESIGN 3 .1 Conceptual Designs To select an appropriate design for GARD IAN, various design options were studied during its development. Questions answered by the study included: 1) how many detectors should be used, 2) what type of detectors should be used, 3) what should the placement/orientation of the detectors be relative to the assayed container and 4) the overall process of how the system will be used (i.e., how best to optimize use of the system for both quality of performance and efficiency of use). The following paragraphs in this section provide a brief summary of the designs considered and rationale for the design selected.

3.1.1 Number of Detectors To answer the question of how many detectors are needed for a given assay system, consideration should be made for the required counting sensitivity, the size of container(s) to be assayed, and the potential for non-homogenous activity distributions within the containers. More detectors, when summed to provide an overall response of a system, increase the sensitivity of the system. A greater number of detectors also allow larger containers to be more fully "covered" and closer spacing of detectors provides better accounting of non-homogeneous activity distributions (provided the detectors can be placed close enough to the container for meaningful differentiation).

Conversely, a system with a greater number of detectors is more costly, more difficult to calibrate and maintain, and has a greater chance of failure of a given component of the system. Therefore; an appropriate balance between the requirements of a given application and potential drawbacks must be made when.

selecting a system design.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TI1LE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 4 of30 In balancing the above, the optimum number of detectors for GARDIAN was determined to be four. Modeling and sensitivity an~lysis indicated that a four detector system would be able to meet the minimum detectable activities (MDA) required by HBPP Site Closure. Placing the four detectors, two per side, also provides for a reasonable sectioning of a large roll-off type container into quadrants (Figure 9.2). The advantage of better coverage for non-homogeneous activity distributions provided by a system with more detectors can be addressed (as was done with GARDIAN) by supplementing the system with scanning detectors as described in this document.

3.1.2 Type of Detectors Qualitative analysis of potential gamma-emitters is required by the HBPP Site Closure Group for the disposition of bulk materials. Therefore, some of GARDIAN's detectors had to include gamma spectroscopy capability. High purity germanium (HP Ge) detectors were selected over sodium iodide due to their greater peak resolution, gain stability, and available calibration benefits (i.e., may be characterized for ISOCS calibrations, which are necessary for practical calibrations oflarge geometries). To supplement the system with scanning detectors, sodium iodide and plastic scintillation detectors were considered. While sodium iodide was initially considered, plastic scintillation detectors were ultimately chosen due to their low cost and availability in large sizes/volumes, high sensitivity, and durability in rugged environments. The complementary combination ofHPGe and plastic scintillation detectors used with GARDIAN makes optimum use of two proven radiation measurement technologies.

3. l .3 Placement/Orientation of Detectors To assay a large container of waste, such as an intermodal or roll-off type container, radiation sensitive detectors may be positioned under the container, above the container, at the side of the container or some combination thereof. Positioning detectors under a large container such as inter-modals or roll-offs, was considered to be the least practical option for the following reasons: 1) there is greater and non-homogeneous shielding at the bottom of typical large containers (i.e., heavy gfluge metal and loading/unloading rails) that complicates the modeling and efficiency determination necessary for accurate assay measurements; 2) positioning containers into such a position would be the most difficult and time consuming (i.e.,

lifting/placing large containers by forklift), and/or 3) high cost and setup time of an alternative underground system, which also adds shielding from the truck bed/structure. Therefore, the most viable positions for placement of assay detectors were considered to be above the container and/or at the side the container.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESI.GN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 5 of30 Two spe'cific preliminary assay system designs were evaluated for potential use for GARDIAN; These were an overhead system, where assay detectors are positioned above the container, and a side viewing system, where* assay detectors are

_positioned along each side of the container. With both systems, a supplementary scanning system would be incfoded to perform a gross contamination level screening and to scan for significant non-uniformities (i.e., hot spots). Both of the conceptual designs were reviewed and compared and the side viewing system was selected due to its simplicity, flexibility, portability and ease of use, while still meeting all assay measurement requirements ofHBPP Site Closure.

3.1.4 Conclusion A side-viewing system with multiple detectors (i.e., four HPGe and two plastic scintillation detectors) was the selected configuration for GARDIAN. This .

combination and configuration is flexible (i.e., easily adapted to count boxes as well as larger containers of various shapes and sizes), can be quickly setup (simply pull and park trailers.in setup location), is portable should the system need to be relocated (only a power supply and truck road/path is required), and combines the best of complementary and proven technologies. The system as designed will meet all the assay measurement requirements of HBPP.

3 .2 Equipment Descriptions This section describes in more detail each of the components comprising the GARDIAN Mobile Assay System as constructed. Information concerning calibration, operation and testing of the assembled system is found in the applicable section later in this document.

3 .2.1 Assay Trailers The GARD IAN Mobile Assay System includes two semi-trailers that house and provide support for the system's equipment/instrumentation as well as transportation means. The trailers include a 51 feet long by 8.5 feet wide Main Assay Trailer and a 48 feet long by 8.5 feet wide Support Trailer (Figure 9.1). Mounted inside of each trailer are two detector tracks and towers that are used to position the system's HPGe detectors at the correct spacing and height. The Main Assay Trailer also includes the assay office or control room for the system.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 6 of30 3.2.2 GARDIAN Assay Office/Control Room The front end of the Main Assay Trailer includes a temperature-controlled office that serves as the control room for the GARDIAN system. The system's computer and accessories, detector electronics, monitors, and desk are located in this office to provide a convenient location for control and oversight of GARDIAN's operation.

A closed circuit camera/monitoring system is also present in the office (with cameras mounted at strategic locations between the trailers) to allow the Gardian operator to view.the trucks/containers during their survey and assay.

3.2.3 Platform/Conveyor When GARD IAN is operated in its box container mode (i.e., for survey of smaller containers), the system's platform and conveyor are used (Figure 9.3). The conveyor is positioned perpendicular to the Main Assay Trailer and connected to the platform and track in the trailer to allow the platform to move in and out of the trailer. Boxes or other similar containers are loaded on the platform outside the Main Assay Trailer and brought inside the trailer and positioned adjacent to the detectors. The HPGe detectors inside the Main Assay Trailer are rotated inward (i.e., facing each other) during this mode of operation to view the containers during their assay.

Counting may be performed with one detector per side or two detectors per side (if Support Trailer detectors are transferred to the Main Assay Trailer as shown in Figure 9.3).

3.2.4 Detector Tracks There are four detector track units included with the GARD IAN system. Two tracks are located in each trailer to provide support for the detector towers and allow a variable spacing between the towers. As appropriate for the container type and size, designated positions on the tracks are pre-selected for each tower to optimize the assay of the containers (i.e., center each detector at its container quadrant). Lock-down clamps secures and maintains the towers at the designated position on the tracks.

3.2.5 Detector Towers There are also four detector tower units included with the GARD IAN system. As is the case with the detector tracks, two detector towers'are located in each trailer (i.e.,

one tower on each track) to provide support for the detector housings and allow a variable height adjustment of the detectors. For a given container type/size, designated heights are selected for the detectors to optimize the assay of the container and are maintained in proper position by the tower lead screw and gear drive.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TI1LE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 7 of30 3.2.6 Detector Housings Each detector is supported by an enclosure that houses and supports the detector and secures the detector and associated housing to a detector tower via a lead screw.

The vertical position of the detector is set by manual adjustment using a gear drive (driven by a powered hand-tool/attachment) that raises or lowers the detector and housing on the lead screw.

3 .2. 7 System Detectors GARDIAN currently uses HPGe detectors manufactured by Canberra. The detectors are germanium coaxial detectors with a 20% efficiency rating (i.e., relative to a 3" by 3" Nal) and 2.0 keV resolution rating based on the 1332 keV gamma from Co-60 (GC2020 model designation). The detectors include an integral liquid nitrogen cryostat (dewar) with a five-day rating. The detectors must be cooled down to liquid nitrogen temperature before applying voltage to the detectors, which include a high voltage inhibit circuit to protect the detectors from unscheduled/accidental warm up.

To allow use of Canberra's ISOCS calibration software, each of the GARD IAN detectors has been characterized by Canberra. The characterization process included detailed measurements of the detectors and modeling using the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory. Actual measurements of point sources in various locations about the detectors are also performed during the modeling process to confirm the detector's characterization.

Replacement or significant repairs to any of GARDIAN's HPGe detectors requires a repeat of the characterization process and re-establishment of the associated calibration files.

3.2.8 System Electronics The GARDIAN system includes state-of-the-art spectroscopy electronic equipment including the following:

• ICB Digital Signal Processors (4 each)

• ICB 6 KV High Voltage Power Supplies (4 each)

• NIM BIN/Power Supply (6, 12, 24V) 110 V AC (2 each)

• Acquisition Interface Modules (2 each)

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 8 of30 Each of the above components is housed/mounted in an environmental cabinet and powered via an Uninterrupted Power Supply system (UPS) for system continuity and stability. The cabinet with components is located in the environmentally controlled assay office.

3.2.9 Computer Hardware/Software The GARDIAN computer system currently consists of the following equipment: 1

• Computer: Pentium III-600 PC

• SDRAM: 128MB

• Hard Disk: 10/20 GB TR5 Internal EIDE D

• CD-ROM: 48X Internal IDE

• Ethernet Interface Adapter (PC I Bus)

.

• Display: 17" Color SVGA

• Printer: HP LaserJet 4050 The operating software for GARDIAN has been developed by Canberra and includes the following:*

• Windows NT, V 4.0 Operating System

• Genie-2000 Gamma Spectroscopy Software

• Genie-2000. Quality Assurance

• NDA 2000 Integrated Neutron/Gamma Analysis Software

• ISOCS Efficiency Calibration Software 3.2.lOLudlum Model 3500-1000 Radiation Detection System The Ludlum Model 3500-1000 Radiation Detection System includes two large plastic scintillation detectors, infrared sensors monitor, and computer control software. The detectors are 2" by 5" by 48" long and are contained along with their associated photo-multiplier tube in a cylindrical PVC housing. The detectors/housings and infrared sensors are mounted at the inboard ends of the GARDIAN system trailers (see Figure 9.1). The infrared sensors allow the system to operate in a background measurement mode until the presence of a truck/container is sensed at which time the system switches into "measurement" mode (with measurement subtraction of continuously updated background).

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 9 of30 The µionitor for the system, located inside the Main Assay Trailer office, supplies detector high voltage, signal processing, measurement readout and alarm settings/features (including both visual and audible alarms). Computer control software is also included with the system to allow additional alarm setting controls/instructions, visual indication of background corrected readings and specific locations of alarms (i.e., a front or back, and right or left side indication is provided when a preset alarm setting is exceeded).

The Ludlum scanning system is included with GARD IAN to provide a more thorough and comprehensive survey/assay of large containers of waste. The large active volume of the system's detectors provide for a very sensitiye and timely go/no-go analysis of containerized waste and also a guard against the release of significant localized activity via its top-to-bottom, front-to-back, scan survey of both sides of the container/waste.

The alarm setting for the Ludlum scanning system is adjustable in increments of background standard deviations. The recommende4 setting-for the system and basis (depending on specific project or customer needs) is detailed in Section 4.4.2 of this document. '.--

3.3 Design Specifications 3.3.l System Capacity NOTE: The quoted capacity is based on high-density concrete rubble or similar type waste and includes time requirements reasonably expected for staging, Ingress/egress, and subsequent processing and review of results (higher throughputs may be possible in specific cases).

• 84 million pounds per year

• 420,000 pounds per* ten-hour work shift (four ten-hour shifts/week for 50 weeks)

• 14 roll-off type containers per work shift (assumes approximately 30,000 pounds per roll-off container)

• 30 minute total processing time per roll-off (assay in operation 70% of each work day to allow for daily startup/shutdown, QC tests and system maintenance)

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 10 of30 3 .3 .2 Sensitivity Criteria The GARD IAN system was designed to meet a minimum detectable activity (MDA) of 5.0 pCi/g (at 95% confidence) or less of total gamma emitters principally present in commercial nuclear power waste (i.e., primarily Co-60 and Cs-13 7). For most waste types and gamma emitters a counting sensitivity at or below 1.0 pCi/g for individual nuclides will be possible with relatively short count times (i.e., a few minutes or less).

3.3.3 System Support Needs The following equipment and other support requirements are necessary to support the field operation of GARD IAN:

• Power Supply-200 Amps @ 240 V AC/60HZ (Single Phase, Neutral, Ground)

• Setup Area- 45' by 60' area required for setup of the Main and Support Trailers (additional space as necessary for trucks/containers to maneuver through the system)

• Scale with capacity capable of weighing containers/waste to be processed

• A means or method of determining container fill volume (this information is used with waste weight to determine the average waste density in the container)

• An entry awning or other suitable enclosure is recommended for the trailers if GARD IAN is used in locations subject to inclement weather 3 .3 .4 Backup Mode of Operation The de~ign of GARDIAN allows up to a 50% loss of detectors and/or associated electronics without a significant impact to operation or project schedule. If part of GARDIAN is inoperable, the system is re-configured to perform the assay of

, containers in a two-step process. The functioning detectors and electronics (if not already) are placed in the front positions in the trailers and truck mounted containers are assayed in two steps (front half followed by back half after re-positioning the truck/container). This backup mode of operation allows repair or replacement of malfunctioning equipment without significant impact to system performance or schedule.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 11 of30 4.0 CALIBRATION METHOD 4.1 Energy Calibration 4.1.1 Energy Calibration Source The source used to perform the energy calibration of the Energy Solutions GARDIAN Mobile Assay System is the multi-energy nuclide Eu-152. Specifically, the energy calibration is performed using the seven (7) predominant gamma energies listed in Table 4-1 below. As shown in Table 4-1, Eu-152 has a wide range of abundant energy lines that cover the bulk of the energy range of nuclides expected to be potentially present in waste forms assayed by GARDIAN. For example, the two most prominent gamma emitters potentially present in most waste or material from nuclear power facilities are Co-60 and Cs-13 7, whose gamma energies of 1173 keV and 1332 keV (for Co-60) and 662 keV (for Cs-137) are within the range of Eu 152 gamma.

Table 4- 1 Energies and Abundances of Eu-152 Energy(keV) Abundance(%)

121.8 28.4 244.7 7.49 344.3 26.5 778.9 12.7 964.1 14.4 1112.1 13.3 1408.0 20.7 4.1.2 Energy Calibration Process The energy calibration is performed in accordance with the Genie-2000/NDA-2000:

software developed by Canberra. The process involves collection of a spectrum using each of the system's detectors and the Eu-152 calibration source. After adjusting the system amplifier gain and/or ADC zero setting (as necessary) for 1

approximately 0.5 keV per channel; the primary Eu-152 gamma energies are identified to the system and a fitted energy calibration curve is determined by the software. This calibration allows the energy of detected gamma peaks to be identified.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 12 of30 4.2 Shape Calibration During the performance of the energy calibration, the FWHM values (Full Width at Half Maximum) for each calibration source peak are also determined. From the measured FWHM values, a calibration curve is determined, which allows the system to determine the expected peak shape versus peak energy. Region of Interest (ROI) and peak identification parameters are based on the expected peak shape (i.e., FWHM), which are applied to each potentially present gamma energy.

4.3 Efficiency Calibration 4.3.1 ISOCS Calibration Software To calibrate the various counters, containers and geometries used by GARDIAN, Canberra's ISOCS calibration software is used; ISOCS is a mathematical method of determining detector efficiencies. Several densities are modeled for each general material type expected in order to determine a multi-curve efficiency file that allows correction of assay results over the range of expected waste/material densities.

The first step in conducting an ISOCS calibration is the preparation of a Geometry Template (i.e., a description of the particular container and counting arrangement).

The geometry template file is then processed to create (via mathematical modeling) an efficiency curve for the geometry and detector(s). The ISOCS efficiency curve is then combined with other curves as appropriate (e.g., various waste densities.to cover the expected range) to form a multi-curve efficiency. This process is repeated for each geometry, container, and count type of each counter defined for GARDIAN. The results are subsequently specified as an overall efficiency file for each possible arrangement.

Additional detail of the ISOCS calibration process is provided below. Preparation of geometry templates and the completion of each step of the process is conducted in accordance with Reference 8.1.

4.3.2 Geometry Templates Performance of an ISOCS calibration for a given geometry requires the establishment of an input data file or geometry template. The geometry template fully specifies all necessary parameters for the geometry including: detector characterization file; description/dimensions of collimator; description of all shields/attenuators (e.g., detector housing plate, trailer wall, and container wall thickness and material types); source to detector geometry; density, dimensions and waste material type(s) of source; and gamma energies to be evaluated.*

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 13 of30 Geometry templates were prepared for both concrete rubble and soils for the HBPP decommissioning project including a set of densities that would span the range that could be encountered for each. Average waste densities of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.5 glee were included for concrete (typical concrete rubble is between I .O and I .5 glee due to intermixed air space) and 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 glee for soils. To illustrate how geometry templates are prepared, copies of the geometry templates prepared during establishment of the initial efficiency calibrations performed for GARDIAN at HBPP are included in Attachment IO.I.

4.3.3 Efficiency Curves Geometry template files are processed using the ISOCS software to calculate efficiency values for the arrangement at energies specified in the template (e.g.,

energies in the range of O. I to 2.0 MeV were selected to span the Possible gamma emitters present in HBPP bulk materials). A best-fit curve is mathematically determined from the calculated data to allow assay results for any detected gamma energy to be properly corrected for efficiency in the given geometry/arrangement.

Since multiple HPGe detectors are used with GARDIAN, a summed efficiency is also determined by summing the results for each individual detector into a summed efficiency file. This allows an overall or average response for an entire container to be determined. With the individual and summed efficiency files, GARDIAN is able to determine both the overall (i.e., average) results in a given container as well as the results from individual detectors. The efficiency curve results for both individual detectors and summed responses are provided on ISOCS MEfficiency reports. Attachment I 0.2 includes the efficiency curve results determined for the geometries and material types specified-for use at HBPP.

4.3.4 Multi-Curve Efficiencies After efficiency curves are established for each density and_ geometry, a multi-curve effipiency-file is constructed. The multi-curve consists of all applicable densities for each given geometry so sample results can be corrected for the actual density of the sample. When the waste weight and volume are entered during the start of an assay, the average waste density is determined for the sample. The sample density is then used to determine (via interpolation) an efficiency curve for the actual sample density.

ForHBPP, multi-curve efficiencies were created for both concrete rubble and soils as previously noted. Copies of the combined multi-efficiency curves initially prepared for HBPP are included in Attachment 10.3.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 14 of30 4.3.5 Efficiency Files The final step in the completion of an ISOCS based calibration is the generation of an efficiency file for each geometry, combination of detectors, and container type for each specified counter. For GARDIAN, this includes efficiency curves for each separate detector as well as the summed detector response to determine the overall average results in a given container using the multi-detector system.

4.4 Calibration of Ludlum Model 3500-1000 Radiation Detection System 4.4.1 Electronic Calibration The Ludlum Model 3500-1000 is factory set. Detector high voltages, thresholds and other required settings (except for alarm set-point setting as described below) are preset by Ludlum and no further field calibrations are required. Source checks are required to verify the proper operation of the system prior to use each day.

System failures will require return of the unit to Ludlum for repair and re-adjustment. The system includes a startup self-diagnostic that ensures proper operation of the system prior to each use.

4.4.2 Scan Alarm Point Setting For GARDIAN's use with HBPP bulk materials, an alarm set point of approximately 10 µR/hr above background was selected. This level is consistent with the approximate alarm setting of the truck monitor used as the final check for released waste at HBPP and also provides assurance that the total activity potentially present in a given container is minimized.

To actually set the alarm level, MicroShield was used to determine the distance between the 10 µCi. Cs-137 button source (that came with the Ludlum system) and the center of the scanning detector required to produce 10 µR/hr. The source was then placed at this distance from each detector while adjusting the alarm set point until an alarm was just received. For the MicroShield modeling, a two-foot section of the four-foot long detector was evaluated by dividing the detector half into four six-inch sub-sections (with the dose point at the center of each subsection). Due to symmetry, modeling of only one-half of the detector is required. The results of the calculation, based on the initial activity of the source, are provided in Attachment 10.4.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TI1LE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 15 of30 4.4 Calibration of Ludlum Model 3500-1000 Radiation Detection System NOTE: Management has opted not to use this feature of the GARD IAN monitor system for the following reasons:

• The Ludlum Model 3500-100 monitor was included in the GARDIAN monitor primarily to enhance the ability to detect Co-60 particles. Co-60 has not been observed to be a major concern for the HBPP project due to several half-lives of Co-60 having transpired since HBPP' s cessation of power reactor operations in 1976.

• Co-60 is readily detectable by the gamma spec systems of the GARDIAN making the use of this gross count detector redundant.

• .Increased false positive rates have been experienced with other applications these detectors.

4.4.1 Electronic Calibration The Ludlum Model 3500-1000 is factory set. Detector high voltages, thresholds and other required settings (except for alarm set-point setting as described below) are preset by Ludlum and no further field calibrations are required. Source checks are required to verify the proper operation of the system prior to use each day. System failures will require return of the unit to Ludlum for repair and re-adjustment. The system includes a startup self-diagnostic that ensures proper operation of the system prior to each use.

4.4.2 Scan Alarm Point Setting For GARDIAN's use with HBPP bulk materials, an alarm set point of approximately lOµR/hr above background was selected. This level is consistent with the approximate alarm setting of the truck monitor used as the final check for released waste at HBPP and also provides assurance that the total activity potentially present in a given container is minimized.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 16 of30 I

To actually set the alarm level, MicroShield was used to determine the distance between the 10 µCi. Cs-137 button source (that came with the Ludlum system) and 1 the center of the scanning detector required to produce 10 µR/hr. The source was then placed at this distance from each detector while adjusting the alarm set point until an alarm was just received. For the MicroShield modeling, a two-foot section of the four-foot long detector was evaluated by dividing the detector half into four six-inch sub-sections (with the dose point at the center of each subsection). Due to symmetry, modeling of only one-half of the detector is required. The results of the calculation, based on the initial activity of the source, are provided in Attachment 10.4.

4.5 Routine Calibration Checks 4.5.1 Quality Control (QC) Source Checks A daily QC source check prior to use of the GARDIAN system each day will be performed and plotted on a control chart with established limits for performance. The QC source will be a multi-gamma energy source with energies that span the range of expected gamma emitters present in the waste. Parameters of the QC source check include peak location (i.e., channel number to confirm the system's energy calibration) and peak activity (to confirm the system's efficiency calibration) for a low and high end gamma energy (as appropriate for the potential gamma energies of interest for the given waste). Each of the system's four HPGe detectors are separately checked and monitored during the check.

4.5.2 Weekly Environmental Background Count A weekly Environmental Background Count is performed to determine the presence of any low-level interfering nuclide specific activity. The Environmental Background Count establishes background correction values that are subtracted from any detected activity results in subsequent sample assays. The Environmental Background Co1mt is also repeated any time there are significant changes to the background in the area the system is operated.

4.5.3 Daily Background Check (

In addition to the weekly Environmental Background Count a daily Background ,

Check will also be performed while the system is in operation. The Background Check ensures that background levels in the counting area are not significant and are consistent to levels established during the Environmental Background Count. This is confirmed by performing a count (with a count time at least as long as the longest expected sample count time) and verifying the absence of any detected nuclid~s (excluding naturally occurring nuclides).

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TI1LE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1

• OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 17 of30 5.0 GEOMETRY CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Container Placement Sensitivity Analysis 5 .1.1 General Discussion The GARD IAN Mobile Assay System is calibrated assuming the truck/container being monitored is centered between the two system trailers with regard to position along the trailer lengths (i.e., longitudinal position) and spacing between the trailers (i.e., lateral position). Since the exact placement of a given truck/container of waste may vary, the effect of positional imprecision has been evaluated using the system's ISOCS calibration software.

To evaluate the effect Of non-centered trucks/containers, the position of the truck/container was varied up to 12 inches on each side of center. ISOCS calibrations cases were modeled using the same input parameters as the actual calibration files, except for the varied longitudinal or lateral position. A typical concrete density was assumed and three of the standard calibration energies (i.e., 500 keV, 1000 keV, and 1400 keV) were used in the modeling to span the primary energies expected in typical waste (i.e., 662 keV from Cs-137 and 1173 keV and 1332 keV from Co-60).

5 .1.2 Longitudinal Variations As shown in Figure 9.4, variations in the longitudinal position of a given truck/container result in only a very minor relative system error (relative system error is the difference between the modeled response of a specified position versus the modeled response of the centered position assumed by calibration). The relative error for an individual detector was only about 3% at a 12 inch offset. By symmetry, each of the system's four detectors responded the same to a given offset. The potential error on average (i.e., summed r~sponse of all four system detectors) was less (within 1.5%) because while the response of two detectors decrease as the container moves away, the response increases for the other two detectors which are moving closer to the center of the container.

It should also be noted thatthe difference in the response between the three energies evaluated was negligible indicating the slight difference observed was primarily due to geometric effects:

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 18 of30 5 .1.3 Lateral Variations A similar evaluation as described above was performed for1 lateral variations in the position of a truck/container between the GARDIAN system trailers. Figure 9.5 depicts the relative system error noted: for variations up to +/-12 inches. As shown in the figure, the potential error vanes by a greater degree than for longitudinal variations (i.e., up to about 20% at +/-12 inches). This is expected since lateral variations move the container (i.e., the source) away from or closer to the detectors in a more direet

• way. The average response, however, isn't significantly affected. As the response of the detectors in one of the GARDIAN trailers decreases, the response of the opposite side detectors correspondingly increases resulting in only a minor difference in the overall response of the system (i.e., average response within 3% at +/-12 inches offset).

As was observed by longitudinal variations, there was *also a negligible difference between the responses of each of the three gamma energies evaluated in the lateral case (i.e., effect is geometry related as expected).

5 .1.4 Conclusion It is expected that routine methods used to aid in correct placement of a given truck/container within the GARD IAN system will be able to ensure placement within

+/-12 inches. Therefore, truck/container placement and its effect on the results will not be significant. Even the approximate +/-20% noted for individual detectors for a 12-inch lateral offset is within typical counting uncertainties for activity levels near the Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA). The potential error for the system due to longitudinal offsets as well as the system as a whole in both longitudinal and lateral cases was shown to be negligible.

5.2 Container Fill Volume Sensitivity Analysis 5.2.l General Discussion Variation of position or placement of a given container within the GARD IAN System's trailers and the associated effect on the system's response was evaluated in the previous section for two dimensions (i.e., front-to-back or longitudinal and side-to-side or lateral variations). The third possible dimension (i.e., height of container relative to GARDIAN's system detectors) is not evaluated since use of a specified truck/container type and associated placement of the detectors on the detector towers will center and fix the arrangement. However, a related effect could occur due to a variable fill level/volume in a given container. This section evaluates the effect that partially filled containers could have on the response of the GARDIAN system.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 19 of30 5.2.2 Analysis To eyaluate the effect of partially filled containers, multiple ISOCS calibration files were prepared as previously described with the same parameters used during calibration except for the container fill volume. Fill volumes, in six-inch increments from 12" of material up to a full container (i.e., 42" for the container to be filled at Big Rock Point) were compared to the nominally expected fill of 30" to 36" (based on typical waste densities and container weight limitations). Figure 9.6 illustrates the relative system response for the different fill volumes evaluated.

As shown in Figure 9.6, the effect of fill volume is negligible. There was only a very small difference observed (approximately 1% or less) over the range of fill levels 1 evaluated (no difference between gamma energies as before). The minimal effect is understood since the conical field-of-view of the GARD IAN system detectors/collimators and detector-to-container distance is sufficient to encompass one-half of a given container's length, which is much greater than the height of a typical container. Therefore, from a geometry standpoint, variable fill volumes are relatively minor and are still in the approximately center of the detector's field-of-view.

5.2.3 Conclusion Although knowledge of the approximate fill volume within a given container is important (in order to properly access the volume and therefore* density of the waste in the container), the actual fill level is not. The response of the GARDIAN system to a wide range of possible fill levels will not significantly affect the reported result or its accuracy.

5 .3 Layered Contamination within a Container 5 .3 .1 General Discussion An additional evaluation was performed to determine the effect of "layered" contamination within a given container. For-example, if a large roll-off container is loaded and only the first "bucket or two of waste is contaminated; a contamination layer could reside in the bottom of the container (assuming clean material is subsequently loaded on top of the contaminated waste). Contamination could also similarly reside in the middle or top regions of a container. This evaluation was prompted in part as a follow-up to help explain and evaluate some of the empirical measurements observed during testing of the GARDIAN system as will be discussed in Section 6 of this document.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 20 of30 5.3.2 Analysis To perform the layered contamination evaluation, multiple layers of contaminated waste were placed in the bottom, center, top, and mid-points between center and top/bottom of the roll-off container specified for the Big Rock Point project. A 12-inch layer of contamination was assumed (very thin layers of contamination were not considered reasonable). The results of this evaluation are provided in Figure 9. 7 .

.As shown by the figure, the variation in the GARD IAN system's response to the summed layered contamination profile was not significant nor gamma energy dependent. The system's response would be slightly high if centered in the container (since the contamination is more centered within the detector's field-of-view) and slightly low if in the top or bottom of the container (where the modeled relative system error was determined to be within 6%). By symmetry, each of the four system detectors would respond the same and therefore, Figure 9.7 also represents the overall system response.*

5.3.3 Conclusion The precise location of a layer of contamination within a container is not a significant concern. The overall modeling and assumptions provide for a reasonable assessment of the total amount of contamination (or potential contamination if not detected) present in an assayed container without regard to the specific location of the contamination.

5 .4 Highly Localized Contamination Considerations 5.4.1 General Discussion The evaluations and analysis presented thus far in this document have examined the effects of gamma energy, waste type and density, geometrical variations, and a realistic non-uniform contamination profile on the results of the GARDIAN assay system. Another question often asked, in regard to the assay of large volumes of waste, is the effect of localized contamination (i.e., highly non-uniform spatial distribution of contamination within a waste volume). This section summarizes some of the features of GARD IAN as well as other' technical considerations that mitigate potential consequences of non-uniform activity distributions.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 21 of30 5.4.2 Maximum Activity Potentially Present per Container To begin a discussion of non-uniform activity in a given large container, it is helpful to first identify the maximum total activity potentially released in the container due to its size and sensitivity of the assay. This information, by comparison, aids further discussion of the maximum activity potentially present in highly non-uniform activity distributions. The nuclide Cs-137 is used in the following discussion since it represents the principle nuclide potentially present in most HBPP bulk materials.

The maximum activity concentration of Cs-13 7 that is allowed per HBPP LTP (DCGL) is 7.9 pCi/g. For a 10 yard dump truck loaded with approximately 20,000 pounds of waste; this would result in about 71 µCi of potential activity (i.e.; 20,000 .

lbs x 454 g/lb x 7.9E-6 µCi/g-= 71 µCi). Therefore, in order to be released, assay of the example truck will show that the total Cs-137 activity potentially present is below 71 µCi.. ,

5.4.3 GARDIAN Scanning System Response to Localized Contamination As previously discussed, a Ludlum Model 3500-1000 Radiation Detection System is included with the GARD IAN system to supplement the overall survey of a large container of waste. This system includes plastic scintillation detectors on each side of the monitored container and is provided to allow for a timely go/no-go screening survey and a guard against highly non-uniform activity.

The worst-case contamination distribution for GARD IAN would be a very small source (in physical size) located in or near the center of the container. For a large roll-off container loaded with concrete rubble of typical density, a couple oftenth-value layers of waste would shield/attenuate a source located in the center of the roll-off.

Nevertheless, the GARDIAN system still provides an upper limit on the maximum amount of activity that could be present as an isolated point source.

In addition to container size and waste. density, the upper limit of localized activity in a large container of concrete rubble is dependent on the alarm set point of the Ludlum scanning system. As previously described in Section 4.4.2, the recommended set point for GARD IAN corresponds to an exposure rate of approximately 10 µR/hr above background. Modeling using MicroShield (with a point source placed in the middle of a concrete rubble filled container of the type used at Big Rock Point) indicates that a source of about eight (8) mCi of Co-60 (the principle nuclide potentially present in most Energy Solutions customer waste) would result in a 10

µR/hr increase in the exposure rate at the position of the Ludlum plastic scintillation detectors (MicroShield report included in Attachment 10.4).

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 22 of30 Eight (8) mCi of Co-60 activity is approximately a factor of20 above the amount of total activity assumed to be present during the radiological dose assessment as was previously shown. A factor of 20 (although large for some measurement situations) is

. considered to be a reasonable and practical limitation for such a hypothetical (and highly unlikely) scenario. Realistic non-uniform activity distributions are more readily accounted for by GARDIAN due to the statistical averaging that occurs with randomly distributed localized sources of activity.

5.4.4 Statistical Considerations Another consideration regarding the use of GARD IAN as a waste disposal surv~y system is the statistical nature of randomly distributed activity when considered over several containers of waste. While it is possible for a worst-case deposition of activity in, or near, the center of a roll-off container, it is also possible that such activity is located near the side of the container resulting in an over-response. In a statistical data set, the average of a number of measurements (if system bias is not present) approaches the true mean activity as the number of measurements increase.

To further illustrate by example, consider a pile of 15 million pounds of waste debris or rubble (the maximum amount of waste that may be released to a given landfill in a given year per Energy Solution's BWAP). If the pile of waste was assessed by random sampling, there would be a very high statistical certainty associated with the mean result of 500 samples. This total number of samples is roughly th~ number of containers (assuming 15 million pounds were released at approximately 30,000 pounds per container) that could be released in a given year. When considering the total activity potentially released to a given landfill over several years, the statistical power improves even more.

The GARD IAN approach is further strengthen (relative to sampling) by the fact that the final survey of waste via GARDIAN effectively assays a much larger amount of waste by assaying 100% of all containers than would be achieved by grab sampling.

Therefore, when considering all waste released to a landfill over time, a properly calibrated and operated assay system should be able to demonstrate that the total amount of activity potentially released is within the amount assumed and justified by assessment. This is true even for non-uniform activity due to the statistical averaging that occurs in a large data set.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 23 of30 5.4.5 Conclusion The radiological assessment performed to establish the appropriate release limits and sensitivity requirements for GARDIAN's use in conjunction with Energy Solution's BWAP accounts for the low levels of radioactivity potentially released. Even if non-uniform activity is potentially present, GARDIAN is capable of verifying that the total amount of radioactivity potentially released via the system is within the amounts assumed by the assessment used to establish the HBPP limits. The maximum amount of activity in a given container is also limited by the system's sensitivity requirements and the combination of detection technologies used by GARD IAN.

6.0 SYSTEM VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION 6.1 Introduction To V &Veach of GARDIAN's HPGe (high purity germanium) detectors and ensure the system is ready for use at the Humboldt Bay Power Plant, testing was performed of each detector using a NIST traceable multi-energy source. The source modeled for testing using ISOCS calibration software iqcluded the radionuclide Eu-152, which has several key gamma energy lines across the energy spectrum of interest at HBPP (i.e., 100 to 2000 keV). Each detector MCA was configured with a 4 channel per ke V conversion gain using channels 400 to 8,000 to span the energy range.

After verification of each detectors ISOCS characterization file (including evaluation of current dead layer thickness which can grow for p-type HPGe detectors like those used with GARDIAN), base line measurements were collected with each detector and its associated check source (i.e., a source originally containing 1 µCi each ofEu-155 and Na-22). The low and high energy range of the source (i.e., 86.5 keV and 1274.5 keV) were specifically measured to establish a reference point for future response testing to confirm detector responses remain consistent throughout system operation.

The following sections describe the testing configuration and present V&V test results.

The attachments in the V &V document (Reference 8.6) provide detailed information on the ISOCS models, assay reports and spreadsheet evaluations of results.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 24 of30 6.2 V&V Test Configuration 6.2.1 Test Source A NIST traceable source containing Eu-152 was used to perform the V& V tests of the GARDIAN-1 HPGe detectors. The source (EnergySolutions ID number 099803) is a point source sealed in a thin layer of epoxy forming a 3/8" diameter spot in the bottom of a l" diameter plastic vial. Seven key energies from Eu-152 were specifically evaluated including 122, 244, 344, 779, 964, 1112, and 1408 keV.

These energies provide a good representation of the GARDIAN-I system energy range (100 to 2000 ke V) as well as the range of energies expected to be encountered in HBPP waste/materials.

The original source activity of the source included 33.54 µCi +/-5% ofEu-152 (9/2111998 certificate date), but had decayed to 14.621µCi at the time ofV&V testing. The higher activity level of the source (relative to typical check sources) provided better counting precision at a distance that avoided coincidence summing issues and minimized potential error with precise source positioning. A copy of the source certificate for source #099803 is included in Reference 8.6.

6.2.2 Measurement Configuration To minimize coincidence summing loses and positioning errors, the outside of the source vial was positioned 24 inches from the detector end cap during testing (i .e.,

24.5" from the center of the l' diameter vial). The source (in the bottom of the vial) was positioned in I ine with the center of the detector as shown by Figure 6.1 below.

Figure 6- 1 Measurement Configuration (detector aligned with point source in bottom of vial)

The vial (liquid scintillation vial) included a 0.033" wall oflight density polyethylene. The Model S573 ISOCS Calibration Software Technical Reference Manual was used to ensure proper setup of the geometry composer reports for each detector. Copies of the geometry composer reports for each of the four detectors are included in Reference 8-6.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 25 of30 J

6.3 V&V Measurement Results Table 6-1 below presents the individual detector results obtained for each of the key Eu-152 energies and the result for the four-detector system as a whole. Although individual detector results are obtained when operating the GARDIAN-1 system (to provide an indication of the activity distribution in containers/materials assayed), the primary result is the summed detector response, which effectively is the average activity concentration throughout the container.

The weighted mean activity ofEu-152 measured by each of the system detectors, which provides the best quantification ofEu-152 present in the vial, was also evaluated. Table 6-2 below provides the weighted mean activity for each of the detectors and the system's summed (i.e., average) response.

Table 6-1 V&V Test Results for GARDIAN HPGE Detectors Energy Det#1 Det#2 Det#3 Det#4 Det Current  %

keV 3994 3996 3997 3998 SUM Activity Difference

µCi µCi µCi µCi µCi µCi 121.8 15.33 15.44 14.91 15.34 15.26 14.62 +4.4%

244.7 14.45 14.23 14.22 15.26 14.54 14.62 -0.1%

344.3 13.69 13.57 13.85 15.70 14.20 14.62 -2.9%

778.91 14.18 13.23 13.53 15.98 14.23 14.62 -2.7%

964.0 14.26 13.93 13.42 14.80 14.10 14.62 -3.6%

1112.0 14.40 13.23 14.08 15.17 14.22 14.62 -2.7%

1408.0 13.24 13.35 13.90 14.66 13.79 14.62 -5.7%

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARD IAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 26 of30

- "t Repo rte dbIY GARDIAN HPGE De t ec t ors T a bl e 6 2 E u- 152 A Cf IVltY Eu-152 Reported Eu-152 Source Detector Activity (µCi) Activity (µCi)  % Difference

1. 1 3994 14.15 14.62 -3.2%

1. 2 3996 13.86 14.62 -5. 2%

1. 3 3997 14.01 14.62 -4.2%

1. 4 3998 15.34 14.62 +4.9%

SUM (Average) 14.34 14.62 -1. 9%

6.4 Baseline Measurements Upon completion of V & V testing, a base line for the current performance of each of the system detectors was established using the detector's specific response test source to provide a reference value for future detector evaluations. The standard source provided by Canberra for ISOCS detectors was used for this evaluation by attaching the source to the top end of the detector as shown in Figure 6-2 below. The l" button source at the end of the source jig is positioned 3.5" from the detector end cap when positioned with the tab against the end cap as shown in the figure below.

Figure 6- 1 Position of Check Source and Detector for Base Line Measurements Three measurements were collected for each detector and its associated check source and the average result for both the 86.5 keV peak (from Eu-155) and the 1274.5 keV peak (from Na-22) is shown in Table 4-1 below.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 27 of30 Table 6- 3 Base Line Measurements for GARDIAN HPGE Detectors Source Control 1274.5 keV Line Number 86.5 keV Line Activity (cps)

Detector Activity (cps) Test Date 080701

1. 1 -3994 HBS598 30.94 6.27 10/13/14 080702

1. 2-3996 HBS599 28.44 5.81 10/13/14 080703

1. 3-3997 HBS600 27.17 6.09 10/13/14 010702

1. 4- 3998 HBS601 36.00 7.17 10/10/14 Quality Control charts have been setup for each detector to monitor the response at both the high and low energy peaks. QC parameters to be monitored include peak centroid for both peaks (to provide validation of the detector energy calibration) and peak activities for both peaks (to provide validation of the detector efficiency calibration).

6.5 Summary/Conclusion V & V testing has been completed for all four HPGe detectors associated with the GARDIAN-1 assay system. Activities at several gamma energies in the range expected at HBPP have shown proper response using each detector's associated ISOCS characterization file. All gamma energies tested were within 10% of the certified source activity for all four detectors and the summed detector response (i.e., indication of the overall system result) was within 6% of source certified activity for each energy and within 2% of the weighted mean activity for Eu-152.

Base line measurements have been collected for the system's detectors to allow future evaluations of detector responses. Quality Control charts have been setup to allow future response testing and comparison to acceptance criteria. The system's HPGe detectors are ready for operation.

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 28 of30 7.0

SUMMARY

/CONCLUSION Energy Solution's GARD IAN Mobile Assay System was designed to assay bulk materials targeted for potential beneficial reuse on-site or other similar characterization needs.

Specifically, its design and detector locations/orientations were selected to simplify the operation of the system in support of an efficient and reliable means of performing assays of large volumes of material. It combines proven technologies to allow accurate measurements to be taken of materials in a variety of geometries including truck mounted roll-off, 10 yard dump trucks or intermodal type containers. The system is portable and flexible to accommodate a variety of project or field situations. An Engery Solutions GARDIAN Mobile Assay system with 6 detectors is also available at HBPP and has a similiar configuration to the 4 dectetor system described herein.

The calibration method for GARDIAN is well documented and has been validated through*

evaluation and testing as presented in this document. The effects of gamma energy waste type and density, and container type/geometry are all taken into account by the system's calibration.

The reliability of the system has been supported through both a comprehensive vendor V & V of the GARDIAN system software and by empirical measurements of NIST traceable sources and,previously assayed waste distributions. As a result of the design and post-development testing, the Energy Solutions GARDIAN Mobile Assay System is considered to be a reliable and an appropriate system for assay and characterization of waste/materials in various containers (including large roll-off, dump trucks or intermodal type containers) prior to reuse or disposal.

8.0 REFERENCES

8.1 EnergySolutions, LLC. TBD-GC-003, Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the GARDIAN Mobile Assay System r 8.2 EnergySolutions, LLC. TBD-GC-001, Technical Basis for Design and Calibration of the Duratek Box Assay System '

8.3 Model S573/S574 ISOCS/LabSOCS, Validation & Verification Manµal 8.4 Model 8573 ISOCS Calibration Software, User's Manual/ Detection System 8.5 MicroShield Version 6.02, Grove Engineering, 2003 8.6 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, 2014

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE 29 of30 9.0 FIGURES 9.1 GARD IAN Mobile Assay System Large Container Mode 9.2 GARD IAN Mobile Assay System Top View 9.3 GARD IAN Mobile Assay System Box Container Mode 9.4 GARD IAN Response versus Longitudinal Placement of Container 9.5 GARD IAN Response versus Lateral Placement of Container 9.6 GARDIAN Response versus Variable Fill Level in container I

9.7 GARD IAN Response versus Layered Contamination in Container 9.8 GARDIAN Response versus 10 µCi Cs-137 Source 9.9 GARDIAN Response versus 6 µCi Eu-152 Source 9.lOGARDIAN Response Testing of GIC Assayed Concrete Rubble 9.11 GARD IAN Response Testing of GIC Assayed DA 10.0 ATTACHMENTS 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files 10.2ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots 10.4MicroShield Modeling Results 10.5Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT NUMBER TBD-401 VOLUME 12 TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR DESIGN, CALIBRATION, AND REVISION, 1 OPERATION OF THE GARDIAN MOBILE ASSAY SYSTEM PAGE -- 30 of30 11.0 RECORDS None 12.0 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION Site Closure

GARDIAN Figures Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System

)

DETECl'OR 10WER (ADJUSTABLE DEl'ECTOR HEJGHl)

Figure 9- 1 Gardian Mobile Assay System - Large Container Mode TBD-401 Page 1 of7

GARDIAN Figures Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and 0 eration of the Gardian Mobile Assa S stem DURATEK GAROIAN SYsTEM

• GENERAL ARRANGEMENT U.'WE COlll'"-"'1!11 ASSAY MOD:E (mt>::;I( MOl.W!CD)

RLV 1/tO-:U.-OZ Figure 9- 2 Gardian Mobile Assay System - Top View TBD-401 Page 2 of 7

GARDIAN Figures Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assa S stem DURATEK GARDIAN SYSTEM MB-90 INDMOUAL BOX />SSAY MOOE REV 1/10-22-02 Figure 9- 3 Gardian Mobile Assay System - Box Container Mode TBD-401 Page 3 of7

GARDIAN Figures Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System 00%

40%

31.l"t.

i 2':1%

l 10%

~

0% ,_,. ~

oil)

-10%

~

! *20%

-30%

-40%

-60%

. -12" .9* .a- -3"' ()" +3" " :*.' +6" ~ +12" Dlsb!nce from Center l-0-o:iobNc..1- -+-tClll0<1/'/~ ~1<<0bV~ ~aronv-. ;-*-1@biivA...._. ~t~bl/knn;JO I Figure 9.4: Ganlian Response~ L<!rigitudinal Placement of Container 60%

.. 40".4 30%

... v.;__

£E 20%

~

i 10%

0%

"""' ~

~ ~

~

i

-1~

~20%

-30%

-40%

-50%

• 12" ~ -69 .;J' O" +a* +9' +12'"

Distance From Center Figure 9.5: Gardian Response versus Lateral Plac;cment of Container TBD-401 Page 4 of?

GARDIAN Figures Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System

'60%.....-~-----~-....~---~~~..-~--------..-----~~~..-----------.

40%-l-~~~~-P~~~~~-i-~~--~-+-~--~~~-1-----------l

• i 10%+-~---,-----.,..+----------+----------+~~------+-----~~~

ij .

0%.fiii.~-------i!iJ-~--~--i!l'~---------11t-~------~iii-----~~~*ill*'*

• th%

~ -~~-1----------1------------1--~--~~-+~~-------1-------~-1

~ ~0%+-----------+----------+-------~-1---~~-----1---...;...._----~-1

-40'>C.+-----------+----------+-----------+-----~----+----------1

• -$l'll'o+-----------+-----------1----------------------+-------~-t e w - ~ .~

Container Fill t.ovel Figuni 9.6~ Gatdia11 Respol,lSe Ver&US Container Fill ~el 5ll%----~--~---~~~~~~~---------------------~~------.

40%+-----------------------------------------------------l

~+-~~~------------------------------------------------1

! 2!)~+------------------------------------------------------1 E 10%+-~----------------------------------------------------1

!~~~__.~~~*~~~-----~~

l!l:lr""  !!3

,1 *10%

1~**

~0%+---~------------------------------------------------4

-40%~-~-------------------------------------------------~--i 0-12" 7..5-~9.5" 1s.27" 22.£34..5" ContamTMtlO:n Loyer LCHll.IU11n i=-9-li:IOhl'/--IDflO~ _.....l4i>>iovl I Figure 9.7: Gardian ReS°ponse verSIJs La.yer< -"""M --:"TlwVnW t FigUre 9.8: Gardiii.n.Responseto a 10 µa cs..131 Button Source

• ~1' " ' ;. I ~ ' ~-

a~ s+-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;;;:;;;;;;;;:;;;;;~~--1 A

I 4+-~~~~~~~~~~~~~--T~~~~~~~~~~~~--1 2 3 Datsctor Number Figure 9.9: Gardian Response tCi*Eu-152 Vilil Source TBD-401 Page 6 of7

GARDIAN Figures Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System sa

!IQ

';J40 i

-3D 820 .

'tD D

1 2 ' 3 4 DW!Ctor Number Figure 9.10: G~Responsc versus ~IC ~ayed Concrete Rnbbfo

~ a-1-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--1

§

~ 4-1-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1 2 3 4 Dotector Number Figure 9.11: Gardian Response Vct91l!l GIC Assayed DAw TBD-401 Page 7 of7

Attachment 10.1

!SOCS Geometry Template Files Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System Revision 0 Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files TBD-401 Page 1 of 14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files GARDIAN SYSTEM Calibration Records Energy I FWHM Calibration TBD-401 Page 2of14

Attachment 10.1

!SOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibration Report 11/18/2014 3:32:39 AM Page 1

• • • • • E N E R G Y C A L I B R A T I 0 N R E P 0 R T *****

Detector Name: DETOl Sample

Title:

Det 01 3994 7000 Sec 111814

• • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Energy Calibrate Performed on: 11/18/2014 3:30:01 AM by:

Energy Calibrate Type: POLY Energy ( keV) -0.655 + 0.251*ch + -2.39E-007*chA2 + 1.80E-Oll*ch"3

• • • • • • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Shape Calibrate Performed on: 11/18/2014 3:30:01 AM by:

FWHM 0.515 + 0.042*E"l/2 LOW TAIL 5,4E-001 + 1.1E-003*E

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE ****************

Centroid Centroid Energy Channel error (keV )

239,95 0.03 59.54 422.47 0.02 105.31 2644.90 0.02 661.64 4691.98 0.03 1173.21 5097.33 0.07 1274.53 5329.30 0.04 1332.46

• • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE *********

Energy FWHM FWHM TAIL TAIL (keV ) channels error channels error 59,54 3.42 0.07 2.17 0.20 105.31 3.72 0.04 3.10 0.30 661. 64 6.39 0.04 6.95 1. 23 1173.21 7.73 0.06 8.15 1. 46 1274.53 7.83 0.14 6.43 0.90 1332.46 8.13 0.07 8.43 1. 00 TBD-401 Page 3of14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Shape Callbratlon Curves

• • • B**** FWHM ~LowTa!I 2.5

.1~/

I/

2

,~v I

/

v k

e v

1.5 I/

y

/

0.5 0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 Energy = -6.548e-001 keV + 2.5o9e-001'Ch - 2.3B7e-007'Ch'2 + 1.604e-011*ch'3 FWHM = 5.147e-001 keV + 4.179e-002'E'1/2 Lo Tall = 5.411e-001 keV + 1.102e-003'E TBD-401 Page 4of14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibration Curve ra Measured - - Calculated j 2500 2000 -

~

1500

~

k .~

v e

1000 L/

~

I~

500

~

0

~

0 1024 2046 3072 4096 5120 6144 7166 8192 Channel Dalasource: DETO 1 Energy = -6.54Be-001 keV + 2.509e-001*ch - 2.3B7e-007'Ch'2 + 1.804a-D11'Ch'3 FWHM = 5.147e-001 keV + 4.179e-002'E'112 Lo Tall = 5.4116-001 keV + 1.102e-003'E TBD-401 Page 5of14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibration Report 11/18/2014 3:33:45 AM Page 1

• • • • • • EN E R GY C A L I B RAT I 0 N R E P 0 R T *****

Detector Name: DET02 Sample

Title:

Det02 3996 7000 Sec 111814

• • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Energy Calibrate Performed on: 11/18/2014 3:25:48 AM by:

Energy Calibrate Type: POLY Energy(keV) -0.132 + 0.250*ch + 4.82E-008*ch"2 + -l.04E-Oll*ch"3

• • • • • • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Shape Calibrate Performed on: 11/18/2014 3:25:48 AM by:

FWHM 0.083*E"l/2 LOW TAIL 4.2E-001 + 1.2E-003*E

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE ****************

Centroid Centroid Energy Channel error (keV )

238.63 0.02 59.54 421.69 0,01 105.31 2646.28 0.04 661.64 4693.23 0 .10 1173.21 5098.67 0.13 1274.53 5330.67 0.13 1332.46

• • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE *********

Energy FWHM FWHM TAIL TAIL (keV ) channels error channels error 59.54 3.00 0.05 1. 93 0.17 105.31 3.23 0.02 4.12 1. 00 661.64 7.82 0.08 4.90 0.24 1173.21 12.39 0.20 7.48 0.54 1274.53 13.43 0.25 8.37 0.73 1332.46 13.39 0.24 8.11 0.64 TBD-401 Page 6of14

I\

Attachment 10.1

!SOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibratlon Curve IJ Measured - - Calculated 2500

~

2000

~

1500

~

k ~

v e

1000

~~

~

500

~

~

0

~

0 1024 2048 3072 4096 5120 6144 7168 8192 Channel Datasource: DET02 Energy = -1.317e-001 keV + 2.500e-001 'Ch + 4.820e-008'Ch*2 - 1.037e*011 'Ch*3 FWHM = -1.951...002 keV + 8.270e-002'E"112 Lo Tail = 4.190e*001 keV + 1.237e*003'E TBD-401 Page 7of14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Shape Callbrallon Curves j . 1~ FWHM - + - LowTall 3.5

~

$ ~~

i~

3 .* I/'

2.5

~

.. I~

2

. Lv

~*

I k

e ~

v 1.5

~.

1 ~

0.5 i

'.~*~

0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Dalasource; DET02 Energy = -1.317e-001 keV + 2.500e-001'Ch + 4.B20e-006'Ch"2-1.037e-011'Ch*3 FWHM = -1.951 e-002 keV + 8.270e-002'E*1/2 Lo Tail = 4.190e-001 keV + 1.237e-003'E TBD-401 Page 8of14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibration Report 11/12/2014 3:05:27 PM Page 1

• • • • • E N E R GY C A L I B R A T I 0 N R E P 0 R T *****

Detector Name: DET03 Sample

Title:

Det03 3997 7000 11114

• • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Energy Calibrate Performed on: 11/12/2014 3:03:41 PM

\ by:

Energy Calibrate Type: POLY Energy(keV) -0.267 + 0.251*ch + -l.58E-007*chA2 + 9.51E-012*chA3

• • • • • • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Shape Calibrate Performed on: 11/12/2014 3:03:41 PM by:

FWHM 0.459 +

LOW TAIL 5.7E-001 + 8.5E-004*E

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE ****************

Centroid Centroid Energy Channel error (keV )

238.64 0.02 59.54 421. 35 0.01 105.31 2644.68 0.02 .661. 64 4692 .11 0.03 1173.21 5097,67 0.04 1274.53 5329.67 0.02 1332. 46

• • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE *********

Energy FWHM FWHM TAIL TAIL (keV ) channE?ls error channels error 59.54 3.04 0,03 2.15 0.16 105.31 3.22 0.02 15.30 1. 00 661.64 5.24 0.03 6.30 1. 00 1173.21 6.67 0.06 5.46 .0.39 1274.53 6.84 0.08 9.47 1. 00 1332.46 7.05 0.05 6.90 0.47 TBD-401 Page 9of14

Attachment 10.1

!SOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibration Curve El Measured - - Calculated 2500 2000 --

~

1500 -~

k ' ~

e ~-

v 1000

~

500

~

~

0

~

0 1024 2048 3072 4096 5120 6144 7168 8192 Channel Datasource: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILESIDET03_3997_70000_111114.CNF r Energy" -2.672e-001 keV +2.506e-001'Ch -1.576e-007'Ch"2 + 9.512e-012'Ch"3 FWHM " 4.585e-001 keV + 3.461e-002'E'1/2 Lo Tall " 5.684e-001 keV + 8.527e-004'E TBD-401 Page 10of14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Shape Calibration Curves L~ FWHM ---+- low Tall k

e v

o+-~~~~~~-+~~~~~~~f--~~~~~~+-~~~~~~--+~---'-~~~~----1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILESIDET03 3997 70000 111114.CNF Energy= -2.e12e-001 keV +2.506e-001*Ch .:-1.s1ee:oarch*2 + 9.512e-012'Ch'3 FWHM = 4.585e-001 keV + 3.461e-002'E'112 Lo Tall = 5.684e-001 keV + a.527e-004'E TBD-401 Page 11 of 14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibration Report 11/12/2014 2:58:43 PM Page 1

• • • • • E N E R G Y C A L I B RAT I 0 N R E P 0 R T *****

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~************************

Detector Name: DET04 Sample

Title:

DET04 3998 7000 SEC 111214

• • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Energy Calibrate Performed on: 11/12/2014 2:56:55 PM by:

Energy Calibrate Type: POLY' Energy(keV) -0.148 + 0.250*ch + -l.62E-008*chA2 + -3.25E-013*chA3

• • • • • • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION COEFFICIENTS *************

Shape Calibrate Performed on: 11/12/2014 2:56:55 PM by:

FWHM 0.445 +

LOW TAIL 5.5E-001 + 8.0E-004*E

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ENERGY CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE ****************

(

Centroid Centroid Energy Channel error (keV )

238.58 0.01 59.54 421.57 0.01 105.31 2645.92 0.02 661. 64 4692.02 0.03 1173.21 5097.32 0.05 1274.53 5329.05 0.03 1332.46

• • • • • • • • • SHAPE CALIBRATION RESULTS TABLE *********

Energy FWHM FWHM TAIL TAIL (kev l channels error channels error 59.54 2.92 0.02 2.30 0.12 105. 31 3.05 0.02 2.92 0.25 661.64 5.07 0.04 7.09 1. 00 1173.21 6.44 0.05 6.61 0.69 1274.53 6.64 0.09 6.66 1. 00 1332. 4 6 6.90 0.06 6.00 0.38 TBD-401 Page 12of14

Attachment 10.1 ISOCS Geometry Template Files Shape Calibration Curves I

2 r------,-----+--------'----r-----v-.

• rn ...... FWHM -~- Low Tall

.~----------.

.. . . . *v Vi

) ....

• 1.5 + - - - - - - - - - - l - - . : . . __ _~~+-=*-"_"-,j.L,,/:._+-+---+-------+----------l k

e

/

v

/'./~v

Y 0.51-*---------l-------1---------+--------+------___,

Qi--------+--------+--------+---------1---------l 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Oatasource: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILESIDET04_3996_70000_111214.CNF Energy = -1.476e*001 keV + 2.502e-001'Ch

• 1.61Be-008'Ch'2 -3.251e*013'Ch'3 FWHM = 4.451e*001 keV + 3,354e-002'E'1/2 Lo Tall = 5.530e*001 keV + 7.967e-004'E TBD-401 Page 13of14

Attachment 10. 1

!SOCS Geometry Template Files Energy Calibration Curve m Measured - - Calculated 2500

~

2000

~

~

,/

1500 k ~ - /

v e

1000

/

~

500

~

~

0

~

0 1024 2048 3072 4096 5120 6144 7168 8192 Channel oatasource: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILES\DET04_3998_70000_111214.CNF Energy = -1.476e.001 keV + 2.so2e-001*ch -1.618e-ooe*ch*2 - 3.251e-013'Ch'3 FWHM = 4.451e.001 keV + 3.354e-002'E*1f2 Lo Tall = 5.530e.001 keV + 7.Q67e-oo4*E TBD-401 Page 14of14

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System Revision 0 Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports TBD-401 Page 1of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports

\'

GARDJLAN SYSTEM C21Iliilbrn~atiiolill Re~~rdls

• 10 Yard End Jlla11mp Summations TBD-401 Page 2 of93

\

IO Yard End Dump 11/19/14 11/18/2014 10:05:58 PM ctPILt:+/-J~lJMP TRUCK; DETOl; Position 1 2.646 3~S27 4.409 1Q-5

. I I

1 o.,e - I*

I f

-I 1 Q-7 OJ 0

J,..

~

• ~

0 l

C,.)

c -+/-==t1-1-----t

.CD 1 Q-8 -~--*~

- - ::T .

C,.) - -~: -___i;__ 6 __ = r?.3 ~

tt::

w 1Q-9 (ii 0

0 en m

!l Q,

(])

1 Q-10. :l

.Q o~

)>

-0 c Ol Ol co

(]) 3 g.

(])

w ;u (])

(]) ~

g, "O ......

(0 w 102 103 0 0

i.

C/l N Energy (keV)

10 Yard End Dump 11/19/14 11/18/2014 10:06:57 PM c:iPILt+/-JYRPLJ2PMP TRUCK ; DET02; Position 1 2.646 3.527 4.409 1Q-5

~

. 1 Q-6 I 1t

. 1Q-7 I

R 0 . l

~

(.) I c

_ CD 10-8 i I

-- c .

~ _---___ C:. ___ -_~; , - ---~ 9 .

(.)

~

LU 1 Q-9 1Q-10

-0 Dl (C

Cl> - I I I I I I

- I

.j:>.

0 co

(..)

102 103 Energy (keV)

10 Yard End Dump 11/19/14 11/18/2014 10:07:44 PM

~ILt:+/-J YRfriflJMP TRUCK ; DET03; Position I 2.646 3.527 4.409 1Q-5 10-6 I

-I

~ 10-7

[IJ 0

j,.

0

~

-~

(.)

c

_Q)

(.)

1 Q-8 -

r: -* r= -* -- ~. ~ Ii!

ti=

LU 1 Q-9

-0 1 Q-10

&l .

CD - I c.n 0

co w 102 103 Energy (keV)

10 Yard End Dump 11/19/14 11/18/2014 10:08:45 PM ciPILj ~I~ TRUCK; DET04; Positio~ 1 2.646 3.527 4.409 1 Q-5 1 Q-6 -

~

0

>, 1 Q-7 0

c **-------*---

a> G . - C E'.3* ... EJ C 0

~ .

w 10-a Cii 0

()

en m

!l 1Q-9 Q.

Cb

I

.Q )>

o:=::

c: OJ "U

OJ <

Cb 3 g.

cc Cb ;a Cb CJ) Cb 0 "O ~

(0 w 102 10 3 Do

i..

(/) "'

Energy (keV)

10 Yard End Dump 11/19/14 11/18/2014 10:09:45 PM scw10 L+/-J D~ TRUCK ; Sum of all segment spectra; 2.646 3.527 4.409 10-5 1Q-6 I

-I CD 0

.J:,..

0

~

0~

~

(.)

II I

I

- *-- . ~--- -

c 10-7 f _____ ___

Q)

I r::* -~---

(.)

~-. **B -- rs;-

lt:

UJ 10-8 en 0

0 CJ) m

ll Q.

Cl>

I 1Q-9 _.Q )>

o:::i:

c Dl "U

Dl cc

< 3g.

Cl>

Cl> ;a Cl>

-..J Cl>:::!.

"C ~

~

CD w 102 10 3 0 0

lo.

CfJ N Energy (keV)

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports GAJRIDHLAN SYSTEM C21Iliilbnr21tfton JRe~oJrcdl§ 101laR-cl End Dump Attachecl-o 10 Y111'<l End Dump Wnll Thickness o Gnrdi~n Traile1* Wnll Thickness o Encl Dmu11 Positioning .

o Det. 1-4 Density 1.2 models, indMdual efficiency cnls, Summation Cnl.

o Def. 1-4 Density 1.6 models, inclil'i<1unl efficiency cals, Summation Cnl.

o Def, 1-4 Density 2.0 models, inclh*idunl efficiency cnls, Summation Cnl.

o Def. 1-4 Sum Curves for Density 1.2, 1.61 & 2.0.

o Sum of nil Segment Spectrn Performed by -.fjt)~tf-4-1?-"/ Dnte //-/ 'l -It/

Rel'ICwcd by  !)'i//J;Jj~ Dale I}- U'*-fl{

TBD-401 Page 8 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports C&RP B-20 Appendix 8.3 Re\'. 0 Pag.: I of I 10 Ya rd End Dump Wa ll Thickness (Homogenized)

Each detector is positioned 54" from side of dump truck walls with a 90 degree collimator, giving a Field of View of 108" diameter.

Wa ll Steel = 3/16" = 0.1875" I 08" x 36" = 3888 in 2 at 0.1875" thick In the field of view,

+ 3 Vertical Rai ls 6" x 35" = 630 in 2

+ I Lower support beam 98" x 6" = 588 in2

+ 1 End Ra ils 36" x IO"= 360 in 2 Top 98" x 4" support beam not included, sample matrix is expected lo be 4" below top.

Tota l Area= 3888+630+588+360 = 5466 in 2 Effective Thickness = 5466/3888 x 0. 1875" thickness = 0.26" Steel TBD-40 1 Page 9 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports C&RP B-20 Appendix 8. 1 Rcv. O Page I of I Energy Solutions Main Trailer Wall Steel Ch annel flattened = 7" Detector is positioned 14" behind the outside wall of the Main Trailer. Utilizing a 90 degree collimator will give a 28" diameter Field of View. Worst case positioning will place the detector between two of the channels, thus including both in the field of view. The channels also contain 0.5 by 2 3/8" rectangular holes which will not subtracted from the steel area thus being more conservative.

M aterial area Total area of the field of view: A = rrr 2 = rr14 2 = 615.75 in 2.

Area of flatten ed steel chann el: (7" x 18.8") + (1/2 7" x 3.525" x 2ends) x 2channels =312.55 in 2

• Area of PVC: 615.75 in 2

- 312.55 in 2

=303.20 in 2*

Area of trailer skin : 615 .75 in 2

• Effective Thickness PVC = 1/16" thick x (303.2/615.75) =0.031" Steel= 1/16" thick x (312.55/615.75) =0.032" Al Skin= 1/16" thick x 615.75/615.75) = 0.063" Homogenized Wall Density Total Effective wall thickness = 0.031+0.032 + 0.063 =0.126" Density= 0.031/0.126* 1.4g/cc PVC+ 0.032/0.126* 7.86g/cc steel+ 0.063/0.126* 2.7g/cc Al= 3.69 g/cc.

Material percentage= 0.344/3.69 =9% PVC, 2.00/3.69=54% Steel, 1.35/3.69= 37% Al.

For Modeling purposes, the Main Trailer Wall (MTWall) (Absorber 1) = 0.126" thick at 3.69 g/cc comprised of 9% PVC, 54% Steel and 37% Al.

TBD-401 Page 10 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports C&RI' B-20 Appendix 8.2 Rev. 0 Page I of I Energy Solutions Support Trailer Wall Steel Channel flattened = 3 5/8" Detector is positioned 14" behind the outside wall of the Support Trailer. Utilizing a 90 degree collimator will give a 28" diameter Field of View. Worst case positioning will place the detector between two of the channels, thus including both in tile field of view. Tile channels also contain 0.5 by 2 3/8" rectangular holes which will not subtracted from tile steel area thus being more conservative.

Material area Total area of the field of view: A = rrr 2 = rrl 4 2 = 615. 75 in 2.

Area of flattened steel channel : (3.625" x 11.28") +(1/2 3.625" x 2.775" x 2ends) x 2channels = 102 in 2

• Area of wood: 615.75 irl- 102 in 2 = 513. 75 in 2

• 2 Area of trail er skin : 615.75 in

• Effective Thickness Wood= 1/4" thick x (513.75/615.75) = 0.209" Steel= 1/16" thick x (102/615.75) = 0.010" Al Skin= 1/16" thick x 615.75/615 .75) = 0.063" Homogenized Wall Density Total Effective wall thickness = 0.209 + 0.010 + 0.063 = 0.282" Density= 0.209/0. 282*0.75g/cc wood+ 0.010/0.282* 7.86g/cc steel+ 0.063/0.282*2.7g/cc Al = 1.44g/cc.

Material percentage= 0.556/1.44 =39% wood, 0.279/1 .44=19% Steel, 0.603/1.44= 42% Al.

For Modeling purposes, tile Support Trailer Wall (STWall) (Absorber 1) =0.282" thick at 1.44g/cc comprised of 39% wood, 19% Steel and 42% Al.

TBD-401 Page 11 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports 10 Yard End Dump

~

168" 1.

l I

40" Q I J

~

1' "' I 180" 90"

~ 84" -~

WlthDet+/-45"

~ I 54" standolf~ FOV 108"

~~

14" l

<(

I

~

\y 36" overlap 88" TBD-401 Page 12 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports GAJIDIAN SYSTEM C aililb> iratio Jill Reco irdls 10 Yard End Dump Density 2.0 TBD-401 Page 13 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

CANBERRA Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 07:28:29

==

Description:==

10YRD_DET1_D20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_19_14 File Name: E.:\SIMPLE_BOX\10YRD_DETCD20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE.:_BOX, Version:* (default)

Dete~or: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL) ,.

Environment: = =

Temperature 22 °C, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 {16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimen~ions (inches)

No. .Desctlpl:!on: '.d~1' 'd;~'~ '* l'.

.d:3:. 'dA" di~ . di6',' * ; **1_Matenal( .. 'Deaj'sltf ,Re1;*:conc; 1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 csteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer ~6 dirt3 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.027559 ., gerrnanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 54 45 0 45 0 List of energies for efficiency cunre generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 34;3.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 Do---.-

6.2 TBD-401 Page 14 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

Geometry ompose1 Repo A Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 07:28:29

==

Description:==

10YRD_DET1_D20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_19_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\10YRD_DET1_D20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 15 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C: \GENIE2K\isocs\data \GEOMETRY\In-S.itu\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 19:06:45 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DETl 020.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/iB/lA 26:04:30 - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom Deacription~ lOYard DETl 020 Comment*: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 19 14 Detector: 3994 - - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]~ 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [G~ams]: 1.8689e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 8.15031e-012 10. 0 0. 069643 77672 59.54 l.67946e-Oll 10.0 0.069955 77672 61.00 3.09474e-011 10.0 0.069981 77672 311. 00 9.57934e-Ob8 10.0 0.014674 77672 311. 98 9.57408e-008 io.o 0.014921 17672 313.00 9.57056e-008 10.0 0.014500 77672 343.00' 9 .. 46628e-008 8.0 0.009458 77672 344.27 9.45986e-008 8.0 0.009386 77672 345.00 9.45654e-008 8.0 0.00933Ei 77672 660.00 7.98467e-008 6.0 -0.008603 71672 661.65 1:97217e-008 6.0 -0.008623 77672 663.00 7. 96932e-008 6.0 -0.008717 . 77672 701. 00 7.85861e-008 6.0 -0.009200 77672 702.63 7.85016e-008 6.0 -0. 009169 77672 703.00 7.85056e-008 6.0 -0.009254 77672 722.00 7.80072e-008 6.0 -0.009190 77672 723. 00 7.79657e-008 6.0 '-Q.009413 17672 724.00. 7.79431e-008 6.0 -0.009362 77672 870.00 7.48425e-008 6.0 -0.009585 77672 871.10 7.47975e-008 6.0 -0.009548 77672 872. 00 7.48454e-008 6.0 -0. 009686 77672 1172.0b 7.1623le-008 4,0 -0.008179 77672 1173.22 7 .16213e-008 4.0 -0.008190 77672 1174.00 7.15900e-OQ!3 4. 0 -0.008222 77672 1273.00 7. 09065e.-oos 4.0 -0:007795 77672 1274.45 7.08861e-008 4.0 -0.007726 77672 1275.00 7.08790e-008 4. 0 -0.007798 77672 1331.bO 7.03723e-098. 4.0 -0.007414 77672 1332.49 7,03928e-008 4. 0 -0.007369 77672' 1334.00 7.03716e-008 4. 0 -0. 007296 77672 1406.00 6.9328le-008 4.0 -0.006728 77672

• 1407. 95 6.93304e-008 4.0 -0.006837 77672 1409.00 6.93300e-008 4.0 -0.006619 77672 1460.80 6.85815e-008 4.0 ~0.006201 77672 TBD-401 Page 16 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I O Measu.red - - Calculated I 1e-007

~I

• ~

Be-008

~111 r~

--+-++-.!,I l T 6e-008 4e-008 2e-008 0

0

) 500 1000 1500 2oqo 2500 Energy {keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 17 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve J o Measured - - Calculated J 1e-007 --

I I

I 1e-008' I

I I

1e~009 I

I

/

1e-010

{

I I

1e-011 1e-012 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

()atasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 18 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

CAN Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:04:30

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_Dffi_D20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\1n-Situ\10YRD_Soil_Dm_D20.geo Software: I SOCS Templ~te: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GAROIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Tem~rature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: =

Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN 24 (16), CRPN 24 {16) =

Dimensions (inches)

"No*. _ Description' ~.di1 d;6: Matetlat ' l Dei151fy* Rel.iei>nc~

1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 dirtl 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 ml.wall 3;7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 gerrnanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 54 -45 0 -45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 . . 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1

• 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 Do--~-

&.3

\

TBD-401 Page 19 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

Geometry on1poser Report CA A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:04:30

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_Dffi_D20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_ 13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In -Situ\10YRD_Soil_Dffi_D20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default) y TBD-401 Page 20 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02: 38: 43 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DET2 020.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:41:58 -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

lOYRD DET2 020 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE_ll_1~_14 Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Converg~nce: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.8689e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value mddified by user 1

Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # .of Voxels 58.00 7.23612e-012 10.0 . 0.072978 77672 59.54 1. 50329e-011 10.0 0.073368 77672

61. 00 2.78963e-011 10.0 0.073443 77 6.72 311. 00 9.51758e-008 10.0 0.027414 77672 311. 98 9.51248e-008 10.0 0.027628 77672 313.00 9. 50911*e-008 10.0 0.027307 77672 343.00 9.40890e-008 8.0 0. 02268.0 77672 344.27 9. 402.65e-008 8.0 0.022586 77672 345.00 9.39942e-008 8.0 Q.022508 77672 660.00 7.95025e-008 6.0 0.007774 77672 661.65 7.93786e-008 *6.0 0.007748 77672 663.00 7.93505e-008 6.0 0.007698 77672 701. 00 7.82570e-008 6.0 0.007553 77672 702.63 7.8:i732e-008 6.0 0.007568 77672 703.00 7.81773e-008 6.0 0.007505 77672 722.00 7. 768.50e-.008 6.0 0.007682 77672 723. 00 7.76440e-008 6.0 0.007523 77672 724. 00 7.76216e-008 6.0 0.007551 77672 870.00 7.45598e-008 6.0 0.008246 77672 871.10 7,45151e-008 6.0 0.008276 77672

!372.00 7.4563ie-008 6.0 0.008094 77672 1172.00 7.13897e-008 4.0 0.010576 77672 1173.22 7.13880e-008 4.0 o.. 010581 77672 1174.00 7. 13569e-008 4.0 0.010563 77672 1273.00 7.06843e-008 4.0 0.011462 77672 1274.45 7.06641e-008 4.0 0.011537 77672 1275.00 7.b6570e-008 4.0 0.011489 77672 13.31. 00 7.Q1563e-008 4.0 0.012137 77672 1332.49 7.01769e-008 4.0 0.012209 77672 1334.00 7. 01558e-008 4.0 0.012243 77672 1406.00 6.91207e-008 4.0 0.013043 77672 1407.95 6.91232e-008 4.0 0.013002 77672 1409.oo 6.91229e-008 4.0 0.013126 77672 1460.80 6.83800e-008 4.0 0.013761 77672 TBD-401 Page 21 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolate~ Efficiency Calibration Curve I El Measured - - Calculated I

.11,,~

Be-008 1~111 T~

~-+-?++t 6e-008 4e-008 I

2e-008 0

0

_) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 22 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency ~urve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculated I 1e-007

I I

I 1e-008 v

I I

1e-009 I l

I I/

1e-010 v I i

• J

)

1e-011 l

1e-012 10 100 , 10000 Energy (keV).

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 23 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports J)~

CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:05:57

Description:

10YRD_Soil_DET3_D2Q Comment: CAL. DATE 11_13_14

File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET3_D20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl ((JARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: =

Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), ~RPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

N9,

• D~sCriptloO: 'd;1.

Box o.26 180 40 88 csteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <hone>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 dirtl 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4

6. Source-Detector 54. 45 0 45 0 J

Lii;t of energi~ for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703;0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 811.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 js1MFLE eox I Do----.-

6,3

!-<------,-©--.<>I

© 6.2 TBD-401 Page 24 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

Geometry Composer eport A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:05:57

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET3_020 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET3_D20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 25 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:44:56 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRO Soil OET3 020.CAL Genie Cal Time.: 11/13/14 03:46:23 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

IOYRO OET3 020 Comment: ISOCS:CAL OATE_li_l3_14 Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence~ 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1~86ff9e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of \foxels 58.00 l.08926e--,Qll 10.0 0.070983 77672 59.54 2.19507e-011 10.0 0.071186 77672.

61. 00 3.96820e-Oll 10.0 0.071114 77672 311. 00 9.59608e-008 10.0 0.014680 77672 311. 98 9.59068e-008 10;0 0.014827 77672 313.00 9.5870le-008 10.0 0.014507 77672 343.00 9.47924e-008 8.0 0.009463 77672 344.27 9.47270e-008 8.0 0.009391 77672 345.00 9.4693le-008 8.0 0.009341 77672 660.00 7.98805e-008 6.0 -0.008602 77672 661. 65 7.97554e-008 6.0 -0.008ti22 77672 663.00 7. 97268e-008 6.0 -0. 008716 77672 701.00 7.86173e-008' 6.0 -0.009198 77672 702.63 7.85327e-008 6.0 -0.009168 77672 703.00 7.853666-008 6.0 -0.009253 77672 722.00 7.8037le-008 6.0 -0.009189 77672 723.00 7.79956e-008 6.0 -0.009412 77672 724. 00 7. 79729e-008 6.0 -0.009361 77672 870.00 7.48664e-008 6.0 -0.009584 77672 871.10 7.48214e-008 6.0 -0.009547 77672 872. 00 7. 48694e.-008 6.0 -0. 009685 77672 1172.00 7.16420e-008 4.0 -0.008178 77672 1173.. 22 7.16402e-008 4. 0 -0.008189 77672 1174.00 7. lti089e-008 4.0 -0.008222 77672 1273.00 7.09255e-008 4. 0 -0.007795 77672.

1274.45 7.0905le-008 4.0 -0.007725 77672 1275.00 7.Q8980e-008 4.0 -0.007797 77672 1331. 00 7.03917e-008 4.0 -0.007414 77672 1332.49 7.04122e-008 4.0 ~0.007368

\

77672 v

1334.00 7.03910e-008 4.0 -0.007296 77672 1406.00 6.93482e-008 4.0 -0. 006727 77672 1407.95 6.93506e-008 4. 0 -Q.006836 77672 1409.00 6.93502e-008 4.0 -0.006618 77672 1460.80 6.86024e-008 4.0 -0.006207 77672 TBD-401 Page 26 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibra~lon Curve I El Me.,sured - - Calculated I 1e-007 .*

11,.~

8e-008

~111 r~

--+-++ .*. _,(,I IT 6e-008 4e-OOB Ze-008

/

0 0

) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 27 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated. Efficiency Calibration Curve

.I El Measured - - Calculated I 1e-OO? ',

I

'~ '""'

I I

/.

I 1e-ooa -

I I

I I

1e,-009

/_

1ec010 I

I 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Dat!:lSOut9e: DET01 TBD-401 Page 28 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports P~

CAi\ll3El=<RA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:07:00

==

Description:==

10YRD~Soil_DET4_D20 Comment: CAL bATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET4_D20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX; Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

- d;l .d.3< **d:4. . di5 - - : _d;6-No. Descrj1>tioi:i d;2. :Mat!lrial  : .QensJtY,. (l"el*'~ri~

1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 So.urce - Bottom Layer 36 dirt! i 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 Source*Detector 54 -45 0 -45 0 Lisi: of energies for efficiency curve generation

\

58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660~0 661.7 663.0 701.0. 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 . 1174.0

' 1273.0 1274.4 . 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 js1MPLE aox I

'oo--~-

R 1---------E-.l

©

>' l

-(-r 6.4~~----D-,,.:*"-.=o--,..,-.rn--~"""'--

Q e 04,,,.,,,;;.

LA TBD-401 Page 29 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

Geometry Composer Report A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:07:00

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET4_D20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET4_D20.geo Software: !SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 30 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C: \GENIE2I~\isocs \d~ta \GEOMETRY\In-Si tu \SIMPLE_BOX\lOYRD~So,il IsOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:50:38 Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DET4 020.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:51:55 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

lOYRD DET4 D20 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE_11_13_14 Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [$q Meters]: 4 .1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.8689e+007 (C)

Lehgth [Meters]: not used

{Cl = Value calculated by rsocs (U) = Val~e m6dified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 4.49302e-0.11 10.0 -0.073740 77672 59.54 8.20018e-Oll 10.0 -0. 07154.5 77672

61. 00 l.36332e-010 10.0 -0.069738 77672 311. 00 l.03752e-007 10.0 0 .. 016161 77672 311. 98 1. 03594e-0.07 10.0 0.015924 77672 313.00 l.03536e-d07 10.0 0.016068 77672 343 . .ob l.00723e-007 8.0 0.015831 77672 344.27 1.00604e-Cl07 8.Q 0.015864 77672 345.00 l.00588e-007 8.. 0 0.015728 77672 660.00 8.81793a~oos 6.0 0.008555 77672

'661. 65 8.80832e-008 6.0 0.008398 77672 663.00 8.80873e-008 6.0 0.008279 77672 701. 00 8. 71192l-OQ8 6.b 0.007715 77672 702. 63 8.70804e-008 6.. 0 0.007650 77672 703.00 8.70489e-008 6.0 0.007428 77672 722.00 8.66337e-008 6.0 0.006982 77672 723.00 8,65977e-008 6.0 0.007046 77672 724.00 8.65910e-008 6.0 0. 007203 77672 87Q.OO 8,40002e-008 6.0 0.005234 77672 871.10 8.39893e-008 6.0 0.005376 77672 872. 00 8.399\)9e-008 6.0 0.005237 776.72 1172.00 8.14758e-008 4.0 0.004310 77672 1173 .22 8.15067e-008 4.0 0.004193 77672 1174.00 8.14578e'-008 4.0 0.004013 77672 1273,00 8.07000e-008 4.0 0.004305 77672 1274.45 8.07045e-008 4.0 0.004461 77672 1275.QO 8.06919e-008 4.0 0.004560 77672 1331. 00 8.01464e-008 4.0 0.004946 77672 1:332. 4 9 8.01938e-008 4.0 0.004855 77672 1334.00 8.01985e-008 4.0 0.004898 77672 1406.00 7.94446e-008 4.0 0. 005*401 77672 1407.95 7.94099e-008 4.0 0.005389 77672 1409.00 7. 94078e-008 4.0 0.005431 77672 1460.80 7.88892e-008 4.0 0.005855 77672 TBD-401 Page 31 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.2e-007 1e-007 I

~

Be-008

~tTIL-t- ~L,J,_1 I I

~

I I T T T 6e-008 4e-008 --

2e-008 I

0

_)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 32 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Cur\ie J D Measur~ - - Calculat.ed J 1e-006

~~~

1ecoo7

- -- - H I

I

- ~~~

1e-008 I

I I

1e-009 I

I J

{

1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy. (keV)

Da,tasource: DET01

\ I TBD-401 Page 33 of93

i~~~~cyta~~~~.b~~~~~~=----~---~----~------------------~

!!__.-w-e-~~h-=:_t-=_-=_~:1_-=_-=_-=_-:=_~58=-~o.l._ _ _~5=9=,5"!____6~1~.o~l_ _---'3~1~1-~o*!____3~1=2=.o~l_ _-=-3~13=-0~'*-----'34'-=3.=0,!___-=-344-'-""'.3~!___-034~5=*~011~_ _ _6=6=0~-~: _ _ _6_61_.7~

II 1 1.000 8.15e-012 1.68e-011 3,ose-011 9.58e-008 9.57e-008 9.57e-008 9.47e-008 9.46e-008 9.46e-008 7.98e-008 *7.97e-008 2 1.000 7.24e-012 1.50e-011 2.79e-011 9.52e-008 9.51e-008 9.51e-008 9.41e-008 9.40e-008 9.40e"008 7.95e-00.8 7.94e-008 3 1.000 1.09e-011 2.20e-011 3.97e-011 9.60e-OQ8 9.59e-008 9;59e-008 9.48e-008 9.47e-008 9.47e-008 7.99e-008 7.98e-008 4 1.000 4.49e-011 8.20ec011 1.36e-010 1.04e-007 1.04e-007 1.04e-007 1.01e-007 1.01e-007 1.01e-007 8.S2e-008 8.81e-008 Sum 7.12e-011 1.36e-010 2.35e-010 3.91e-007 3.90e-007 3.90e-007 3.84e-007 3.84e-007 3.84e-007 3.27e-007 3.27e-007.

Error,% 1.00e+001 1.00e+001 1.00e+001 1.00e+001 1.00e+001 1.00e+001 8.00e+OOO 8.00e+OOO 8.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path 1 1OYRD_Soil_DET1_D20.gis Tue_Nov_ 18_19: 05:55_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\l'.!ata\GEOMETRY\ln-S~u\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 1OYRD_Soil_DET2_D20.gis Thu_Nov_ 13_02:37:53;_2014 C:\GENIE21<\isocs\data\(3EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI 3 1OYRD_Soil_DET3_D20.gis Thu_Nov_13_02:44:06_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

4. 1OYRD_Soil_DET4_D20.gis Thu_Nov_ 13_02:49:47;_2014 C:\GENI E2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

File Name File Stamp Path

Description:

1OYRD_Soil_SUM_D20 Comment Calib Date 11/19/14 A

CANBERRA Muiti-Efficiencv Report (ii 0

0

(/)

m

!l Q.

CD

i

..\2 )>

-u o:=::

c: Dl Dl cc CD

< 3g.

CD

u

"' CD

~

CD ~

0 "C o~

co  ;:i.

CJ)

!=='

I'-)

MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 19:08:49

Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

663.0i 701.ol 702.61 103.ol 722.0i 723.ol 724.0i 87o:oi 871.1 I 872.0! . 1172.ol 1173.2 7.97e-008 7._86e-008 7.85e-008 7.85e-008 7.80e-008 7.80e-008 7.79e-008 7.48e-008 7.48e-008 7.48e-008 7.16e-008 7.16e-008 7.94e-008 7.83e-008 1.82e-008 7.82e-008 7.77e-008 7.76e-008 7.76e-008 7.46e-008 7.45e-008 7.46e-008 7.14e-008 7.14e"008 7.97e-008 7.86e-008 7;85e-008 7.85e-008 7.80e-008 7-.80e-008 7.80e-008 7.49e-008 7.48e-008 7.49e-008 7.16e-008 7.16e-008 8.81e-008 8.71e-008 8.71e-008 8.70e-008 8.66e-008 8.66e-008 8.66e-008 8.40e-008 8.40e-008 8.40e-008 8.15e-008 8.15e-008 3.27e-007 3.23e-007 3.22e-007 3.22e-007 3.20e-007 3.20e-007 3.20e-007 3.08e-007 3.08e-007 3.0Be-007 2.96e-007 2.96e-007 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO. 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

1OYRD_Soil_SUM_D20 Calib Date 11/19/14 A

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report

-u Dl cc CD w

01

~

CD w

Multi Efficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday,. November 18, 2014, 19:08:49 2

Prima Efficiency taken from ECC files. for set energies.~,_:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,

1------1-'-'1-'-74"".o;:_i _ _ _1=-=.2~73=-:.o=-.i_ _ _1.:.: 2:.:. .74~.4. :.,l _ _ _1=-=2~75"",o"",l*----'1"'33~1=.o:cl.--""'1-"-33=2=.s,_,_l_ __c1-"-33~4=*0=-i**--""'1"-'40=6:=.oi _ _"'"'14=o"-7=.ei_ _ _1'-4=oe=.=.Joi_ _ _1"'"4=5=0.=-s1 7.16e-008 7.09e-008 7.09e.008 7.09e-008 7.04ecoos 7.04e-008, 7.04e.008 6.93e-008 6.93e-008 6:93e-008 6.86e-008 7.14e-008 7.07e-008 7.07e-008 7.07e-008 7.02e-008 7.02e-008 7.02e-008 6.91e-008 6.91e-008 6:91e-008 6.84e-008 7.16e-008 7.09e-008 7.09e-008 7.09e-008 7.04e-oos 7.04e-008 7.04e-oos 6.93e~oos 6.94e-oos ~.94e-oos 6.86e-oos 8.15e-008 8.07e-008 8.07e-008 8.07e-008 8.01e-008 8.02e-008 8.02e-008. 7.94e-008 7.94e-008 7.94e*QQ_8~ 7.89e*008 2.96e-007 2.93e-007 2.~3e-007 2.93e-007 2.91e-007 2.91e-007 2.91e-007 2.~7e-007 2~87e-007 2.S?e-007 2.84e-007 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e:+QOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OQO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:IGENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GE0tv'JETRY\ln-S~u\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SlrillPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GE0.METRY\ln"Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI

• Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

10YRD_SoiLSUM_D20 Calib Dafe 11/19/14 Multi-Efficijenc

\l Dl

<O (1) w Cl>

0 (0

w MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 II Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 19:08:49

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports

!SOCS/LABSdCS ~ES0LTS ISOCS/Labsocs File: C:\GENIE2K\isoC:s\da.ta\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multiefficiency\10YRD ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: :I.i/18/14 19: 09: 31 -

Genie Cal File: C:\f;ENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil SUM 020.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 20:06:52 - - -

Template: {SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom

Description:

lOYard SUM 020 - - * -

• Comment: I.SOCS: Ca.lib Date 11/19/14 D~tector: ( 3994) + (3996,) + ( 39.g7) + q998 )+

Collimator: (GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl}+(GARDIAN Gl)+

Convergence: 1. 00 % - - - -

Area [Sq Meters]: 1.0000e-004 (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.ooooe+ooa (Cl Length [Meters]: not tlsed (C) = Value calt:ul9te.d by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 7 .12b92e'-011 10.0 0. 0729780 64.000 59.54 1. 35780e.,...010 10,0 0.0729780 64.000

.61. 00 2. 34.858e-010 10.0 0. 0729780 64000 311. 00 3 .. 90682e-007 10.0 0. 0729780 64000 311.98 3.90366e-007 10.0 0. 0729780 64000 313. 00 3.90203e-007 10.0 0. 0729780 64.000 343: 00 3.84267e-007 8.0 0. 0729780 64000 344.2.7 3.83956e-007 8.0 0. 0729780 64000 345.00 3.8384le-007 8.0 0. 0729780 64000 660.00 3.27409e-007 6.0 0. 0729780 64000 661. 65 3. 269J9e-007 6.0 0. 0729780 64000 663.00 3. 26858e-007 6.0 0. 0729780 64000 701.00 3.22580e-OQ7 6.0 0.0729780 64000 702.63 3.22288e-007 6.0 o'. 0729.780 64000 703. 00 3.22268e-007 6.0 0. 072.9780 64000 722. 00 3.20363e-007 6.0 0. 07297.80 64000 723. 00 3.20203e-007 6.0 0. 0729780 64000 724.00 3.20129e-007 6.0 0.0729780 64 00.0 870.00 3.08269e-007 6.0 b.0729780 64000 871. 10 3 ..08123e-007 6.0 b. 0729780 64000

.872. oo 3.0827~e-007 6.o 0.0729780 64000 1172.00 2.9613le-007 4.0 0.0729780 64000 1173.22 2. 96156e-007 4.0 0.0729780 64000 1174.00 2.96014e-007 4.0 0.0729780 64000 1273.00 2.93216e-OQ7 *4. 0 0.0729780 64000 1274.45 2.g3160e-007 4.0 0.0729780 64000 1275.00 2.931268-007 4. 0 0.0729780 64000 1331. 00 2.91067e-007 4.0 0 .. 0729780 64000 1332.49 2.91176e-007 4.0 0.0729780 64000 1334. 00 2.91117e-007 4. 0 0. 0729780 64000 1406.00 2.87242e-007 4.0 0 .. 0729780 6.4000 1407.95 2.87214e-007 4.0 0.0729780 64000 1409.00 2.8721ie-007 4.0 0. 0729780 64000 1460.80 2.84453e-007 4.0 0. 0729780 64000 TBD-401 Page 37 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Ml:)as.ured - - Calcul.ated I 4e-007 3~5e-007

~

3e-007 1k I I

lt-~i~

2.Se-007 2e-007 1.Se-007 -

1e-007 Se-008 I

0 -

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Da!asource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 38 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Cal~i.daled. I 1e~ooa

~..:....

I "'

1e-007 I

I I

I 1e-008 I

I I

I

' I 1e-009 I

l '

I 1e-010 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 39 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports GAR.DIAN SYSTEM Callilbratii(Q)Im Records 10 Yard End Dump Density 1.6 TBD-401 . Page 40 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

CANBEFl!RA Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 09:41:03

==

Description:==

10YRD_DET1_D16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_19_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\10YRD_DET1_D16'.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

DimensiQns (inches)

No; Box 0.26 180 40 88 <:steel 7.9 2 source.- Top Layer 0 <none.>

3 Source - BOttom Layer 36 dirt2 1.6 Loo 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 ,Absorber2 0.027559 gennanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 54 45 0 45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58,0 59.5 61.Q 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345;0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 lsl!.tPLE BOX j f -x IL.z Do--~~

6.3

______ 0_ _._6.l

©

..~ l TBD-401 Page 41 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

Geometry omposer Report A Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 09:41:03

==

Description:==

10YRD_DET1_D16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_19_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\10YRD_DET1_D16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 42 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 21:54:49 - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DETl D16.CAL Genie Qal Time: 11/18/14 22:01:40 - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

10 Yard OETl Dl6 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 19 14 Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.4951e+007 (Ct Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Val~e ~odifi~d by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 l.01605e-011 10.0 -0.161760 77672 59.54 2. 0934 5e-011 10.0 -0.158453 77672

61. 00 3. 85728'e-011 10.6 -0.155549 77672 311. 00 l .. 18915e-007 10.0 -o'. 045167 77672 311. 98 1.18846e-007 10.0 . -0.044722 77672 313. 00 1.18808e-007 10.0 -0.044708 77672 343.00 l.17489e-007 8.0 -0.040519 77672 344.27 1.17406e-007 8.0 -0.040274 77672 345.00 l.17369e-007 8.0 -0.040069 77672 66.0. 00 9.88879e-008 6.0 -0.015800 77672 661. .65 9. 87294e-oo*8 6.0 -0. 015711 77672 663.00 9.86978e-008 6.0 -0.015696 77672 701. 00 9.73006e-008 6.0 -0.014058 77672 702.63 9. 71922e-008 6,0 -0.013961 77672 703.00 9.71998e-008 6.0 -0.014011 77672 722.00 9.6568le-008 6.0 -0.013142 77672 723. 00 9.65143e-008 6.0 -0. 013272 77672 724. 00 9.6489le-008 6.0 -0.013185 77672 870.00 9.2570le-008 6.0 -0.008256 77672 871.10 9.25154e-008 6.0 -0.008317 77672 872; 00 9.25695e-oo8 6.0 -0.008331 77672 1172.00 8.84542e-oos 4.0 -0.002153 77672 1173.22 8.84420e-008 4.0 -0.002124 77672 1174.00 8.84034e-008 4. 0 -0 .. 002094 77672 1273.00 8.75225e-008 4.0 -0.000601 77672 1274.45 8. 74960e-008 4. 0 -0.000571 77672 1275.00 8.74882e-008 4.0 -0;000623 77672

. 1331. 00 8.68524e-008 4.0 0.000170 77672 1332.49 8.68678e-008 4.0 0.000243 77672 1334. o*o 8.68371e-008 4.0 0.000299 77672 1406.00 8.55200e-008 4.0 0.001228 77672 1407.95 8.55199e-008 4.b 0.001194 77672 1409.00 8.55226e,--008 4.0 0.001205 77672 1460.80 8.45792e-008 4.0 0.001890 77672 TBD-401 Page 43 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency .Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.2e-007

'Pl

~

1e-007

~111 T~f--

8e-008

-+-? J IT 4e-008 2e-008 I

0

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page44 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve.

I o Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006 mm n.

1e-001 ..

I I

I I

1e-OOB I

I I

1e-009 I ,I

• • -~

I I

I.

1e-010 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasoutce: DET91 TBD-401 Page 45 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:04:13

==

Description:==

10YRD:_Soil_DITT_D16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DITT_Dl6.geo Software: ISOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: = =

Temperature 65 °i=, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: = =

Convergence 1.00%, MDRPN 21 (16), CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (inches)

Ng; D8$qlj>~pjl ~;1 .. d,2 .,* d;3, ,d;,4 I' .. d;s,.* :d;G * .::Matei:!ati, ** l)i:insify Ret;:con*~

1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 esteel 7.9 2 Source -Top Layer 0 \ <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 I dirtl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mlwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 54 -45 0 -45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663,0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409~0 1460.8 I

k:*

js1t.tPLr sOx Do--~-

i-----~-0-.--&I 0.

TBD-401 Page 46 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

Geometry .omposer Report ... AN A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:04:13

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET2_D16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 Fi le Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET2_D16.geo Software: ISOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 47 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISbCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: ll/13i14 02:34:43 . . - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DET2 D16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:40:3~ - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

RD SOIL DET2 D16 Comll)ent: ISOCS:CAL DATE 13- 14 Detectd:t: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area* [Sq Meters] : 4 .1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams] : 1. 4 95le+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: nbt used

{C) = Value calculated by !SOCS (U) = V~lue modified by ~ser Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final II o.f Voxels 58.ciO 9. 01847e-012 10.0 -0.156533 77672 59.54 1.87334e-011 10.0 -0.153068 77672

61. 00 3. 47604e-011 10.0 -0.150053 77672 311. 00 1.18133e-007 10.0 -0. 057013 77672 311. 98 1.18066e-007 10.0 -0.056600 77672 313.00 1.18029e-007 10.0 -0.056581 77672 343.00 1.16762e-007 8.0 -0.052637 77672 344.27 1.16682e-007 8.0 -0. 05241.9 77672 345.00 l.16646e-007 8.0 -0.052247 77672 660.00 9.84607e-008 6.0 -0.029700 77672 661. 65 9.83034e-008 6.0 -0.029648 77672 663.00 9.82724e-008 6.0 -0. 029629 77672 701.00 9.68930e~oo8 6.0 -0.028071 77672 702.63 9. 6.7856e-008 6.0 -0.027992 77672 703.00 9.67933e-008 6.0 ...'.o. 028058 77672 722.00 9.61697e-008 6.0 -0.027219 77672 723.00 9.61163e-008 6.0 -0.027334 77672 724. 00 9.60916e-008 6.0 -0.027200 77672 870.00 9.22230e-b08 6.b -0.022175 77672 871.10 9.21686e-008 6.0 -0.022252 77672 872. 00 9.22228e-008 6.Q -0. 022296 77672 1172. 00 8.81702e-008 4.0 -0.014922 77672 1173.22 8.81581e~oo8 4.0 -0.014891 77672 1174.00 8. 81197e-008 4.0 -0.014866 77672 1273.00 8.72530e-008 4.0 -0.013145 77672 1274.45 8.72268e-008 4.0 -0.013092 17672 1275.00 8.72191e-008 4.0 -0.013097 77672 1331. 00 8. 6590%-008 4.0 -0.012165 77672 1332.49 8.66064e-008 4. 0 -0.012059 77672 1334.00 8.65759e-008 4.0 -0. 011984 77672 1406.00 8.52694e-008 4.0 -0.010787 77672 1407.95 8.52694e-008 4.0 -0.010784 77672 1409.00 8.52722e-008 4.0 -0.010789 77672 1460.80 8.43359e-008 4.0 -0.009817 77672 TBD-401 Page 48 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpol.filed Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - . - - Calculated j 1.2e.-007

'n~

1~1,,

fo-007

'iiti--l-H-+-t1 Be-008 6e-008 4e-008 2e-OOB I

0 0

_)

- 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Dat11sou.rce: DET01 TBD-401 Page 49 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports

• Interpolated Efficiency Calibration curve I G Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006 r.>r.o*

1e-007 *~r1;.

I I

1e-008 I

I 1e-009 I I

1e-010 J

1e-011 1e~o12 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 50 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports J:\

CANBER,RA Date: Thursday, November 131 2014 - 17:05:15

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET3_Dl6 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 file Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Sbil_DET3_D16.geo software: I SOCS T~mplate: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 {16), CRPN = 24 {16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. _Description' *d;1

• d*7' di3,. *d;4* _d;S .*:<<J.6 Matet1~1,

• Density,' Rel_;-.co.11~:

1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 csteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 dlrtl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 54 45 0 45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313;0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 i275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 lsn.1FLE eox I Do--~-

---

6.1

© 0 6.2 TBD-401 Page 51 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Geometry Co A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:05:15

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET3_D16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET3_D16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 52 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/Labsots File: C:\~ENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:43:00 -

(;enie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DET3 016.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:45:14 - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

lOYRD DET3 Dl6 Conurient: ISOCS:CAL DATE 13 - 14 Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.4951e+007 (C)

Length [Metera] : not used (C) = Value calculated by !SOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 1. 35747e-011 10.0 -0.160582 77672 59.54 2.73528e-011 10. 0 -0.157357 77672

61. 00 4. 94437e-011 10.0 -0.154530 77672 311.00 1.19100e-007 10.0 -0.045153 77672 311.98 - i.19030e-007. 10.0 -0.044709 77672 313.00 1.18989e-007 10.0 -0.044695 77672 343.00 1.17628e-007 8.0 -0.040509 77672 344.27 1.17544e-007 8.0 -0.040264 776.72 34.5. 00 l. l 7506e-007 8.0 -0.040059 77672 660.00 9.89158e-008 6.0 -0.015798 77672 661.65 9.87571e-008 6.0 -0.015709 77672 663.00 9. 87254e-008 6.0 -0.015694 77672 '

701.00 9.73257e-008 6.0 -0.014056 77672 702.63 9. 72172e-008 6.0 -0.013959 77672 703.00 9.72249e-008 6.0 -0.014009 77672 722. 00 9.65921e-008 6.0 -0.013140 77672 723.00 9.65382e-008 6.0 -0.013270 77672 724. 00 9.65129e-008 6.0 -0.013183 77672 870.00 9.25882e-008 6.0 -0.008254 77672 871.10 9.25334e-008 6.0 -0.008315 77672 872. 00 9.25876e-008 6.0 -0.008330 77672 1172.00 8. 84 681e.-008 4.0 -0.002152 77672 1173.22 8.84559e-008 4.0 -0.002123 77672 1174.00 8.84172e-008 4. 0 -0.002093 77672 1273.00 8.75369e-008 4.0 -0.000599 77672 1274.45 8.75104e-008 4.0 -6.000570 77fj72 1275.00 8.75026e-008 4.0 -0. 000621 77672 1331.00 8.68676e-008 4.0 0. 000171 77672 1332.49 8.68830e-008 4.0 0.000244 77672 1334.00 8.i8522e-008 4.0 0.000301 77672 1406.00 8.55365e-008 4.0 0.001229 77672 1407.95 .8. 55364e-008 4.0 0. 001195 77672 1409.00 8.5539le-008 4.0 0.001207 77672 1460.80 8.45969e-008 4.0 0.001891 77672 TBD-401 Page 53 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I El Measured - - Calculated I 1.2e-007 r~

1e-007

~111 r~ .

Be-008

-+++-+~ . T 6e-ooa 4e-008 2e~ooa I

0

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Data.source: DET01 TBD-401 Page 54 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve J El Measured - - Calculated J 1e-006

= =i

n"'- .n 1e-007 I

I I

I I

1e-008 I

I I

1.e-009 -

I I

I/

1e-010 I/

I 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 55 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports P\

CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:06:42

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DEf4_D16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DEf4_D16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLUMADON MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, .Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: _convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

• d,6 No. Description ..

• d.1* .- d;2. d;3 ;d;4'. 1i:s- Ma~rial' ** Denslfy Rel;. Cone; 1 Box 0.26 180 40 BB esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>*

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 dirt! 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 Source-Detector 54 -45 0 -45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 jstMFLE BOX I Do--~-

---

6.1

©

© TBD-401 Page 56 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports 1etry Compo eport CAN A Date: TI1ursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:06:42

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET4_D16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E: \GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET4_D16.geo Software: !SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Pag e 57 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\ciata\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:48:46 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DET4 Dl6.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:50:29 - - .

Template.: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

lOYRD DET4 Dl6 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 13 - 14 Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1,00 ~

Area [Sq Meters): 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Gr~ms]: l.495le+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy E:ff iciency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final 11 of Voxels 58.00 5. 60906e-Oll 10. 0. -0.077528 77672 59.54 l.02353e-010 10.0 -0.075364 77672

61. 00 l.70138e-010 10.0 -0. 07350.1 77672 311. 00 i. 28772e-007 10.0 -0.015791 77672 311. 98 i.28588e-007 10.0 -0.015865 77672

.313.00 l.285Q7e-007 10.0 -0.015640 77672 343.00 l.2499le-007 8.0 -0. 0133.94 77672 344.27 l.24843e-007 8.0 -0.013203 77672 345.00 1.24819e-007 8.0 -0.013355 77672 660.00 1.09196e-007 6.0 -0.006283 7767.2 661.65 l.0907le,.-007 6.0 -'-0.006350 77672 663.00 1. 0-9074e-007 6.0 -0.006320 77672 701. 00 1. 07849e-007 6.0 -0.006148 776.72 702.63 l.07800e-007 6.0 -0.006097 77672 703.00 1.07765e-007 6.0 -0.006236 77672 722. 00 1.07234e-007 6.0 -0.006339 77672 723. 00 1.07195e-007 6.0 -0.006231 77672 724. 00 1.07184e-007 6.0 ..,.o.006063 77672 870.00 1.03895e-007 6.0 -0.005238 77672 871.10 1.03877e-007 6.0 -0.005068 77672 872.00 1.03889e-007 6.0 -0.005196 77672 1112. cio l.00622e-007 4.0 -0.002468 77672 117~.22 1.00651e-007 4.0 -0.002507 77672 1174.00 1.00594e-007 4.0 -0.002532 77672 1273.00 9.96057e-008 4.0 -0.001293 77672 1274.45 9.96058e-008 4.0 -0.001370 77672 1275.00 9.95888e-008 4.0 -0.001336 77672 1331.00 9.88965e-008 4.0 -0.000403 77672 1332.49 9.89484e-008 4.0 -0.000519 77672 1334. 00 9.89486e-008 4.0 -0.000529 77672 1406.00 9.79944e-008 4.0 0.000338 77672 1407.95 9.79486e-008 4. 0 0.000376 77672 1409.00 9.79398e-008 4. 0 0.000490 77672 1460.80 9.72771e-008 4.0 0.001086 77672 TBD-401 Page 58 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports lnt~rpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculated I 1.4e-007 I

- ~

~

1.2e-007 "-._

1e-007 N--~~ I l

T I

Ti I I l ;-

ae-008 6e-008 4e-008 2e-008 I

0 -

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 59 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Cuf'Ve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006

~0- >--r.

1e-007 f-- *- '"

J I

v 1e-OOB I

J I

--~ C-i-I I

1e-009 J

I

/_

~

1e-010 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 60 of93

1. I  : Primal)'_ Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies~-'--:--------------- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____,

_I Weight I 58.0! 59.51 61.oi 311.ol 312.oi 313.ol 343~0: _ _ _344=--*'-"".3c.i_----=-34""5"'".o,_,!_____,6""6-=-0.""o_i._----=-66-=-1=--".7 1 1.000 1.02e-011 2.09e-011 3.86e-011 1.19e-007 1.19e-007 1.19e-007 1.17e-007 1.17e-007 1.17e-007 9.89e-008 9.87e-008 2 1.000 9.02e-012 1.87e-011 3.48e-011 1.18e-007 1?1se-007 1.18e-007 1.17e-007 1.1'7e,007 1.17e-007 9.85e-008 9.83e-008 3 1.000 1.36e-011 2.74e-011 4.94e-011 1.19e-007 1.19e-007 1.19e-007 1.18e-OOT 1.18e-007 1.18e-:007 9.89e-008 9.88e-008 4 1.000 5:61e-011 1.02e-010 1.70e-010 1.29e-007 1.29e-007 1.29e-007 1.25e-007 1.25e-007 1.25e-007 1.09e-007 1.09e-007 Sum 8.88e-011 1.69e-010 2.93e-010 4.85e-007 4.85e-007 4.84e-007 4.77e-007 4.76e-007 4.76e-007 4.05e-007 4.05e-007 Error,% 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 8.00e-1{)00 8.00e-1{)00 8.00e-1{)00 6.00e-1{)00 6.00e-1{)00 Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path 1 10YRD_Soil_DET1_D16.gis Tue_Nov_ 18_21:53:59_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 1OYRD_Soil_DET2_D16.gis Thu_Nov_13_02:33:52_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\d.ata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

3 1OYRD_S.oil_DET3_D16.gis Thu_Nov_13_02:42:09_2014 c:\GENIE2Klis_ocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-S!tu\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 10YRD_SoiLDET4_D16.gis Thu_Nov_13_02:47:55_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

File Name File Stamp Path

Description:

tOYard Soil SUM 016 Comment . Cal Date 11/19/14 A

CANBERRA Muiti-Efficiencv Report Cii 0

0

(/)

m

ll Q.

CD

J

.Q )>

ll o::i:

r:: Dl Dl cc CD CD 3 g.

~  ::0 CD CD  ;::?.

-0 ~

8. 0 0 co  ;:i..

en w N MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 // Printing: Tuesday, November 18,_ 2014, 21 :59:11 1

Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies (keV):

663.0l 701.0! 702.61 703.o: n2.ol 723.o! 724.0 1 870.01 871.1i 872.0i 1172.ol 1173.2 9.87e-008 9.73e-008 9.72e-008 9.72e-008 9.66e-008 9.65e-008 9.65e-008 9~26e-008 9.25e-008 9.26e-008 8.85e,.008 8.84e-008 9.83e-008 9.69e-008 9.68e-008 9.68e-oos 9.62e-008 9.61e-008 9.61e-008 9.22e-008 9.22e-008 9.22e-008 . 8.82e-008 8.82e-008 9.87e-008 9.73e-008 9:72e-008 9.72e-008 9.66e-008 9.65e-008 9.65e-008 9.26e-008 9.25e-008 9.26e-008 8.85e-008 8.85e"008 1.09e-007 1.0Se-007 1.0Se-007 1.08e-007 1.07e-007 1.07e-007 1.07e-007 1.04e-007 1.04e-007 1.04e-007 1.01e-007 1.01e-007 4.05e-007 3.99e-007 3.99e-007 3.99e-007 3.97e-007 3.96e-007 3.96e-007 3.81e-:007 3.81e-007 3.81e-007 3.66e-007 3.66e-007 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO -4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Sltu\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\is()cs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-SMSIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isoc~\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Sltu\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Sltu\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

10Yard*Soil SUM 016 Cal Date 11/19/14

-I OJ 0

A J,..

~

~AN BERRA Multi-Efficiency Report en0 0

Cf) m

ll Q.

Cl>

i

-52 )>

o::::

c Dl "U

Dl

<C Cl>

Cl> 3 g.

O>  ;:o Cl>

"' Cl>:=!.

0 "C ~

0 0

i..

co w rJ)"'

MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 21 :59:11 2

)

Prima Efficiency taken from ECC files, for.set energies ~:

1174.0i 1273.ol 1274.4i 1275.01 1331.0i 1332.51 1334.0: 1406.0t 1407.9i 1409.0 1460.8 8.84e-008 8.75e-008 8.75e-008 8.75e-008 8.69e-008 8.69e-008 8.68e-008 8.55e-008 8.55e-008 8.55e-008 8.46e-008 8;81e-008 8.73e-008 8.72e-008 ~.72e-008 8.96e-008 8:sse-ooa 8.sse~ooa 8.53e-008 8.53e-008 8.53e-008 8.43e-008 8.84e-O_Q8 8.75e-008 8.75e-008 8.75e-008 8.69e-008 8.69e-008 8.69e-008 8.55e-008 8.55e-008 8.55e-008 8.46e-008 1.01e-007 9.96e,Q08 9.96e-008 9.96e,008 9.89e-008 9.89e-008 9.89e-008 '9.80e-008 9.79e-008 9.79e-008 9.73e-008 3.66e-007 3.62e-007 3.62e,007 3.62e-007 3.59e-007 3;59e-007 3.59e-007 3.54e-007 3.54e-007 3.54e-007 3.51e-007 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\$1M.PLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-SitulSIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

10Yard Soil SUM D16 Cal Date 11 /19/14 Multi-Efficienc Ui 0

()

(/)

m

!l Q.

CD

J

..\2 )>

() ::!:

"U c: Dl Dl (C < g.

CD CD 3 *

(l') ;u CD w CD  ;:!,

s, "C Oo

~

co ~

w VIN MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 21 :59:11 3

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File*: C:\GE~IE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multiefficiency\10YRD ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 21:59:28 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil SUM Dl6.CAL Genie Ca,l Time: 11/18/14 22:03:08 - - -

Template: (SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom

Description:

10 Yard SUM D16 - - -

Comment: I SOCS: Cal Date 11/19/14 Detector: (3994)+(3996)+(3997)+(3998)+

Col_limat.or: (GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN_Gl)+(GARDIAN_Gl)+

Convergence:

• 1.00 % - -

Area [Sq Meters]: 1.0000e-004 (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.0000e+OOO (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Vaiue calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final j~ of Voxels 58.00 8. 884.43e-011 10.0 0.0000000 64000 59.54 1.69374e:-010 10.0 0.0000000 64000 61.00 2.92915e-010 10.0 0.0000000 64000

?11. 00 4.84920e-007 1.0. 0 0.0000000 64000 311. 98 4.84530e-007 10.0 0.0000000 64000 313.00 4.84333e-007 10.0 0.0000000 64000 343.00 4.76870e-007 8.0 0.0000000 64000 344.27 4.76475e-007 8.0 0.0000000 64000 345. 00 4.76340e-007 8.0 0.0000000 64000 660.00 4.05460e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 .

661. 65 4.0486le-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 663.00 4.04770e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 701.00 3.99368e-007 6.0 o.oooooo"o 64000 702.i53 3. 98995e-007 6.0 o. 0000.000 6.4000 103.oo 3.98983e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 722. 00 3. 965;64e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 723.00 3.96364e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 724. 00 3.96278e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 870.00 3.81276e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 871.10 3.81094e-007 6 .. 0 0.0000000 64000 872. 00 3.81269e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 1172.00 3.65714e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1173.22 3.65707e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1174.00 3.65534e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1273.00 3.61918e-007 4. 0 0.0000000 64000 1274.45 3.61839e-007 4. 0 0.0000000 64000 1275.00 3.61799e-007 4.o 0.0000000 64000 1331.00 3.59207e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1332.49 3.59306e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1334.. 00 3. 59214e-0.07 4.0 0.0000000 64000 14.06. 00 3.54320e-007 4.0 d.0000000 64000 1407.95 3.54274e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000

.1409.00 3.54274e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1460.80 3.50789e-007 4.0 0. 0000000 . 64000 TBD-401 Page 64 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibra~iQn Curve I O Measured - - Calculated I 5e-007

~

~II rtr-t-H-++- I I T 3e-007 2e-007 1e-007 I

0 0

) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Oatasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 65 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Cuive Reports Interpolated Etnclency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006 - --

'7 I -

I 1e-001 I

I I

1e-Oei8 I

F I

I I

1e-009 I

I 1e-010 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV) baiasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 66 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports GAJRIDIAN SYSTEM C aillft10 Jr a tft ([])fill JRec oJr dl § 10 Yard lEnd Dump Density 1.2 TBD-401 Page 67 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November13, 2014 - 17:01:42

==

Description:==

lOYRD_Soil_DETl_D12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Nam13: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET1_D12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: =

Temperature 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No; . Descrlj>tiol"! *. * 'd;~ d;2 '.d,i3 d;4' . ,'d;~~* "d.6 - Maten11I' Denslfy Re1.:conc; 1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source *- Bottom Layer 36 dlrtl 1.2 1,00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.02756 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 54 45 0 45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312,0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724,0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8

§11.1PLE soxl TBD-401 Page 68 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Geometry poser Report A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:01:42

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET1_D 12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E: \GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET1_D12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 69 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LA~SOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD Soil ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:25:31 ... . -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DETl 012.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:33:43 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

iC)YRD DETl 012 Comment: ISOCS:CAL OATE_ll_13_14 Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.1214e+b07 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Valbe calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of ~oxels 58.00 1. 34 969e-011 10.0 0.092520 87381 59.54 2.78046e-011 10.0 0.086318 87381 61.00 5 .12263e-011 10.0 0.081175 87381 311. 00 1.56802e-007 10.0 0.007994 87381 311. 98 1.56706e-007 10.0 0.008175 87381 313.00 1.56660e-007 10.0 0.007931 87381 343.00 1.54857e-007 8.0 0.004391 87381 344.27 1.54744e-007 8.0 0 .,004364 8738.1 345.00 1.54698e-007 8.0 0.004339 87381 660.00 1.29849e-007 6.0 -0.004267 87381 661.65 1.29635e-007 6.0 -0.004238 87381 663.00 1.29601e-007 6.0 -0.00428e 87381 701.00 1.27707e-007 6.0 -0.004267 87381 702.63 1. 27 563e-007 (). 0 -0.004228 87381 703.00 1.27575e-007 6.0 -0.004359 87381 722.00 1.26716e-007 6.0 -0.004200 87381 723. 00 1.26642e-007 6.0 -0.004383 87381 724.00 1.26612e-007 6.0 -0.004308 87381 870.00 1.2i300e-007 . 6, 0 -0.004133 87381 8.71.10 1.21231e-007 6.0 -0.004071 87381 872.00 1.21291e-007 6.0 -0.004142 87381 1172.00 1.15627e-007 4.0 -0.003736 87381 1173.22 1.15596e-007 4.0 -0..00370.2 87381 1174.00 1.15545e-007 4,0 -0.003717 87381 1273.00 1.14318e-007 4.0 -0.003549 87381 1274. 4,5 l.14282e-007 4.0 -0.003570 87381 1275.00 1.14274e-007 4.0 -0.003660 87381 1331.00 1.13416e-007 4.0 -0.003463 87381 1332.49 1.13423e-007 4.0 -0. 003422 87381 1334,00 1. 13372e-007 4.0 -0.003436 87381 1406.00 1. 11596e-007 4.0 -0.003239 87381 1407.95 l.11588e-007 4.0 -0.003249 87381 1409.00 1. 11596e-007 4.0 -0.003191 87381 1460.80 1.10328e-007 4.0 -0.003034 87381 TBD-401 Page 70 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.6e-007

[~

1.4.e-007 1.2e-007 -

l'iN I

---

t-f?--tt 1e-007 -

8e-00.8 6e-008 -***

4e-008 J 2e-008 I '

0 0

"j 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 71 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports

\

Interpolated Efrici!mcy Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculaled I 1e-006

- \JT.

1e-007 I

I/

1e-008 I

I I

1e-009 I

I I

1e-010 I

1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 72 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:03:55

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_Dm_D12 Comment:: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_Dm_D12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: T~mperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. .. Desc~lptiofi cu:* ""i:l;2 . . "d;3.- *'d;4'. . ' ;d:s:. "*~d.G Material* ~enslfy, Rel .. cone; 1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 dirt! 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 ml.wall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 54 '45 0 -45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 11732 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 jsn.iFLE eox I i-------:-0--6.!

© 6.2 TBD-401 Page 73 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports A

eometry Composer Report A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:03:55

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET2_D12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DITT_D12.geo Software: rsocs Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 74 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\dcita\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMi?LE_BOX\lOYRD_Soil_

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:32:37 Genie Cal File~ C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil'DET2 Dl2.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:39:06 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

lOYRD DET2 012 Corrunent: ISOCS:CAL DATE_ll_.)3_14 Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 % -

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: l.12i4e+007 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used

. (C) = Valu~ c.alculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final j~ of Voxels 58.00 l,19868e-011 10.0 0 .115154 87381 59.54 2. 48963e-011 lQ.O 0 .110206 87381

61. 00 4. 61920e-011 10.0 0.106257 87381 311. 00 l.55888e-007 10.0 0. 052999' 87381 311. 98 l.55794e-007 10.0 0. 053115 87381 313.00 1. 557 5le.-007 10.0 0. 052782 87381

.343.0b 1. 54009e'-007 8.0 0.046588 87381 344.27 l.53899e-007 8 .. 0 0.046394 87381 345.00 l.53855e-007 8.0 0.046281 87381 660.00 l.29344e-007 6.0 0.017183 87381 661.65 1.2913le-007 6.0 0.017120 87381 663.00 l.29098e-007 6.0 0.017049 87381 701.00 1.27224e-007 6.0 0.015833 87381 702.63 l.27081e-007 6.d 0.015736 87381 703.00 l.27093e-007 6.0 0.015643 87381 722. 00 1.26244e-007 6.0 0.015219 87381 723. 00 l.26170e-007 6.0 0.014991 .87381 724.00 1.26141e-007 6.0 0. 0150.72 87381 870. 00. 1.20888e-007 6.0 0. 011807 87381 871.10 1.20819e-007 6.0 0.011852 8.7381 872.00 1.20879e-007 6.0 0.011723 87381 1172.00 1.15289e-007 4.0 0.007933 87381 1173.22 l.15259e-007 4.0 0.007957 87381 1174.00 l.15208e-007 4. b 0.007956 87381 1273.00 1.13998e-007 4. 0 O.b07195 87381 1274.45 1.13963e-007 4.0 0.007123 87381 1275.00 1.13954e-007 4. 0 0.007108 87381 1331.00 1.13105e-001 4.0 0.006762 87381 1332.49 1.13112e-007 4. 0 0.006809 87381 1334.00 l.13062e-007 4. 0 0.006766 87381 1406.00 1. 11298e-007 4. 0 0.006501 87381 1407.95 1.11291e-007 4. 0 0.006456 87381 1409.00 1.11299e-007 4. 0 0. 0065.18 87381 1460.80 1.10039e-007 4.0 0.006363 87381 TBD-401 Page 75 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated. I 1.6e-007 1.4e-007 r~

1.2e-007

~~I -- --- --

--+-+Nf 1e-OQ7 -

Se-008 6e-008 -

4e-008 2e-008 I

0 -

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy .(keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 76 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I re-006

~~~

1e-007 J

""" . ' ~

~

I I

1e-008 I

I ,_ ,_~

I 1e-009 I

J I/

r--~- *-

~

.fl

~

1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (kW)

Datasourc~: DET01 TBD-401 Page 77 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports

'~

CANE\ ERR'°'

Date: Thursday; November 13, 2014 - 17:05:37

==

Description:==

10YRD_SOIL_DET3_~2 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13~14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_SOIL.,__DET3_12.geo Software: I socs Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: = =

Temperature 65 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: =

Convergence 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (inches)

No: Desc,riptJ~n _ <14 d,2* . d;3. .*d:~: ;d,5: .. d_.6 . .. *Material *_, Dens!tv Rel~:co,nc:

1 Box 0.26 180 40 88 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 dlrtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4 6 .source-Detector 54 45 0 45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 lsiMFLE sox I y L::

Do-----.,-

6.3 R

t - - - - - - - : - - - - 6.l

©.

0 6.2

,.. l

&.4',......-:;P.,,....----0--_,.-:::;IL.:::~.:...Z.._Uo-a_ ___,c;<::._-7"-*

-r-- 0 CV!W1HolJO.n

~

TBD-401 Page 78 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports eport A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:05:37

==

Description:==

10YRD_SOIL_DET3_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\10YRD_SOIL_DET3_12.geo Software: !SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: {default)

TBD-401 Page 79 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Sitti\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD SOIL ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: il/13/14 02:40:51 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DET3 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:43:42 - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

lOYRD DET3 12 Comment: ISOC.S: CAL DATE_l1_13_14 Detector: 3997 C0.llirtiator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: l.1214e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 1.80374e-011 10.0 0.092653 8738i 59.54 3. 6.3396e-011 10.0 0.086449 87381

61. 00 6. S6820e-Oll 10.0 0. 081303 87381 311. 00 1.57076e-007 10.0 0.008001 87381 311. 98 l.56977e-007 10.0 0.008182 87381 313.00 1.56929e-007 10.0 0.007938 87381 343.00 1.55069e-Cio7 8.0 0.004397 87381 344.27 1.54953e-007 8.0 0.004370 87381 345.00 1.54907e-007 8.0 0.004345 87381 660.00 1.29904e-007 6.0 -0.004265 87381 661.65 l.29690e-007 6.0 -0.004235 87381 663.00 1. 29656e-007 6.0 -0.004286 87381 701,00 l.27757e-007 6.0 -0.004265 873$1 702.63 1.27613e-007 6.0 -0.004226 87381 703.00 1.27625e-007 6.0 -0.004357 87381 722. 00 1. 26765e-007 6.0 -0.004198 87381 723. 00 1.26690e-007 6.0 -0.004381 87381 724.. 00 1.26661e-007 6.0 -d.004306 87381 870.00 l.21339e-007 6.0 -0.004131 87381 871.10 l.21270e-007 6.0 -0.004070 87381 872.00 1.21330e-007 6.0 -0.004140 873a1 1172.00 1.15657e-007 4.0 -0.003734 87381 1173.22 1.15627e-007 4. 0 -0.003700 87381 1174.00 1.15576e-007 4.0 -0. 003716 87381 1273.00 l.14349e-007 4. 0 -0.0'o3544 87381 1274.45 l.i4313e-007 4.o -0.003569 87381 1275.00 l .14305e-007 4. Q -0.003659 87381 1331. 00 l.13447e-007 4.0 -0.003462 87381 1332. 49 l.13454e-007 4.0 -0.003420 87381 1334.00 1.13404e-007 4.0 -0.003434 87381 1406.00 1.11628e-007 4. 0 -0.003237 87381 1407.95 1. l1621e-007 4.0 -0.003247 87381 1409.00 1. 11628e-007 4.0 -0.003190 87381 1460.80 1.10362e-007 4.0 -0.003033 87381*

TBD-401 Page 80 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculaled I 1.6e-007

• 1.4e-007 1.2e-007

' "i~

I

---

Y-+?--tt 1e-007 8e-008 4e-008 ***- --

I 0

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (ke\I)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 81 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Cal~lated I 1e-006 hr,t I

1e-007 '"'"""

~~~

I I

1e-008 I

I

- I 1e-009 I

I I

I/

1e-010 I*

1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DE:T01 TBD-401 Page 82 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports J>\

CANBEl~RA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:06:19

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET4_D12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET4_D12.geo Software: ISO CS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: = =

Temperature 65 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: =

Convergence 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (Inches)

No. De5.Cfip~im. d:4' *. l\fateria! '. * *. o;en!!ll:Y

• R.el.\COnc; Box 0.26 180 40 88 csteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 36 dirtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 Source-Detector 54 -45 0 -45 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 . 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7  !)63,0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 f11.1PLE BOX I y IL:

Do---.t-6.3

,.,I TBD-401 Page 83 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports omposer Report A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:06:19

==

Description:==

10YRD_Soil_DET4_012 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\10YRD_Soil_DET4_D12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 84 of 93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS IqOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\lOYRD_Soil_

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:46:50 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\10YRD Soil DET4 012.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:47:42 - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

lOYRD DET4 012 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3998* - - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 4.1806e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams}: 1.1214e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by rsocs (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 7. 439.34e-011 10.0 -0.060210 87381 59.54 1.35728e-010 10.0 -0.060704 87381

61. 00 2.25585e-010 10.0 -0.061424 87381 311. 00 1.69713e-007 10.0 -0.036141 87381 311. 98 1. 69490e-007 10.0 -0.036232 87381 313. 00 1.69370e-007 10.0 -0.036174 87381 343.00 l.64688e-007 8.0 -0.035327 87381 344.27 1. 64496e-007 8.0 -0.035269 87381 345.00 1. 64456e-007 8.0 -0.035464 87381 660.00 1.43400e-007 6.0 -0.024850 87381 661. 65 1.43227e-007 6.0 -0.024859 87381 663.00 1.43227e-007 6.0 -0.024788 87381 701. 00 1. 41562e-007 6.0 -0.023900 87381 702.63 1. 41497e-007 6.0 -0.023886 87381 703.00 1. 41458e-007 6.0 -0.023936 87381 722.00 1. 40728e-007 6.0 -0.023689 87381 723. 00 1.40683e-007 6.0 -0.023592 87381 724. 00 1.40663e-007 6.0 -0.023322 87381 870.00 1. 36174e-007 6.0 -0.020944 87381 871.10 1.36146e-007 6.0 -0.020829 87381 872. 00 . 1.36160e-007 6.0 -0.020815 87381 1172.00 1.31564e-007 4.0 -0.016714 87381 1173.22 1.31584e-007 4.0 -0.016771 87381 1174.00 1.31514e-007 4.0 -0.016842 87381 1273.0Q l.30llle-oo7 4.0 -0.015539 87381 1274.45 1.30103e-007 4.0 -0.015654 87381 1275.00 l.30079e-007 4.0 -0.015531 87381 1331.00 1.29132e-007 4.0 -0.014809 87381 1332.49 1.29187e-007 4.0 -0.014905 87381 1334.00 l.29176e-007 4. 0 -0.014808 87381 1406.00 1.27876e-007 4.0 -0.014015 87381 1407.95 l.27812e-007 4.0 -0.014093 87381 1409.00 l.27792e-007 4.0 -0.014048 87381 1460.80 l.26875e-007 4.0 -0.013575 87381 TBD-401 Page 85 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports lnterpola~ed Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated r 2e-007 1.5e-007

~~

~#-+- !-+-++-?+

1e-007 5e-008 0 --

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DETOt TBD-401 Page 86 of93

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006

/

""" - Q.

1e-007 f

I 1e-008 I

f I

I 1e-009 v

J

{

I 1e-010 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 87 of93

1. I i Primary Efficie~cy taken from ECC files, for set energies~.:

_1We~ 5a.o: 59.5: 61.ol 311.01 312.ol 313.0 343.0i 344.3: 345.ol 660.0: 661.7 1 1.000 1.35e-011 2.78e-011 5.12e-011 1.57e-007 1.57e-007 1.57e-007 1.55e-007 1.55e-007 1.55e-007 1.30e-007 1.30El-007 2 1:000 1.20e-011 2.49e-011 4.62e-011 1.56e-007 1.56e-007 1.56e-007 1.54e-007 1.54e-007 1.54e-007 1.29e-007 1.29e-007 3 1.000 1.80e-011 3.63e-011 6;57e-011 1.57e-007 1.57e-007 1,57e-007 1.55e-007 1.55e-007 1.55e-007 1.30e-007 1.30e-007 4 1.000 7.44e-011 1.36e-010 2.26e-010 1.?0e-007 1.69e-007 1.69e-007 1.65e-007 1.64e-007 1.64e-007 1.43e-007 1.43e-007 Sum 1.18e-010 2:2se-010 3.89e-010 6.39e-007 6.39e,.007 6.39e-007 6.29e-007 6.28e-007 6.28e-007 5.32e-007 5.32e-007 Error,% 1.00e-+-001 1.00e-+-001 1.00e-+-001 1.00e-+-001 1.00e-+-001 1.00e-+-001 8.00e-+-000 8._QOe-+-000 8.00e-+-000 6.00e-+-000 6.00e-+-000 Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path 1OYRD_Soil_DET1_D12.gis Thu_Nov_ 13_02:24:34_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 10YRD_Soil_DET2_D12.gis Thu_Nov_13_02:31;39_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

3 1OYRD_SOIL_DET3_12.gis Thu_Nov_ 13_02:39:54_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln*Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 1OYRD_Soil_DET4_D12:gis Thu_Nov_ 13_02:45:53_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\da_ta\GEOMETRY\ln*Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

File Nam!'! File Stamp Path

Description:

10YRD_Soil_SUM_D12

-I Comment: Cal Date 11113114 lJl

~0

~

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report Cii 0

0

(/)

m

ll Q.

CD

J

.Q )>

-u o:=::

c: Ol Ol co <! g.

CD (1) 3 00  :::0 CD 00 CD ~

"O ~

Q, Do

(!)  ;::).

en I\:>

w MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:17:07' 1

Primarv Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

663.0' 701.ol 702.~j 703.0[ 722.oi 723.0! 724.0' 870.oi 871.1 ! 872.0 1172.0i 1173.2 1.30e-007 1.28e-007 1.28e-007 1.28e-007 1.27e-007 1.27e-007 1.27e-007 1.21e-007 1.21e-007 1.21e-007 1.16e-007 1.16e-007 1.29e-007 1.27e-007 1.27e-007 1.27e-O_D7 1.26e-007 1.26e-007 1.26e-007 1.21e-007 1.21e-007 1.21e-007 1.15e-007 1.15e-007 1.30e-007 1.28e-007 1.28e-007 1.28e-0'07 1.27e-007 1.27e-007 1.27e-007 1.21e-007 1.21e-007 1.21e-007 1.16e-007 1.16e-007 1.43e-007 1.42e-007 1.41e-007 1.41e-007 1.41e-007 1.41e-007' 1.41e-007 1.36e-007 1.36e-007 1.36e-007 1.32e.007 1.32e-007 5.32e-007 5.24e-007 5.24e-007 5.24e-007 5.20e-007 5.20e-007 5.20e-007 5.00e-007 4.99e-007 5.00e-007 4.78e-007 4.78e-007 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6,ooe+eoo 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC* files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\da!a\GEOMETRY\ln-$itu\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI Information for saved file with multiefficiency da.ta:

10YRD_Soil_SUM_D12 Cal Date 11 /13/14 p

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report Cii 0

g rn

!l Q.

CD

..Q )>

("):::::

-0 c: D>

D>

c.c CD CD 3 g.

co ;o CD co CD ;::?_

"O ~

~ Do co  ;:i..

w "'N MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:17:07 2

Prima Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

1174.0 1273.0[ 1274.4! 1275.0[ 1331.0: 1332.sl 1334.0i 1406.0[ 1407.9! 1409.0f 1460.8 1.16e-007 1.14e-007 1.14e-007 1.14e-007 1.13e-007: . 1.13e-007 1.13e-007 1.12e-007 1.12e~007 1.12e-007 1.10e-007 1.15e-007 1.14e-007 1.14e-007 1.14e-007 1.13e-007 1.13e-007' 1.13e-007 1.11e-007 1.11e-007 1.11e-007 1.10e-007 1.16e-007 1.14e-007 1.14e-007 1.14e-:007 1.13e-007 1.13e-007 1.13e-007 1.12e-007 1.12e-007 1.12e-007 1.10e-007 1.32e-007 1.30e-007 1.30e~007 1:30e-007 1.29e-007 1.29e-007 1.29e-007 1.28e-007 1.28e-007 1.28e-007 1.27e-007 4.78e-007 4.73e-007 4.73e-007 4.73e-007 4.69e-007 4~69e-007 4.69e-007 4.62e-007 4.62e-007 4.62e-007 4.58e-007 4.00e-+000 4.00e-+000 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4. OOe-+000 4:ooe-+000 4.00e+OOO 4.00e-+Obo

• 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\G ENIE2Klisocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

G:\G ENIE2Klisocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\Sltv1PLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with tnultiefficiency data:

10YRD_Soil_SUM_D12 CalDate 11/13/14

-I OJ

~0

~

Mult!-Efficienc ort (ii 0

0 Ul m

Q.

CD

i

-52 )>

-u o~

Ill c Ill cc CD

< 3g.

CD CD  ::0 CD 0

CD  ;:t aCD

'C 0

i..

~

0 w rn N MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 // Pririting: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:17:07 3

Attachment 10.2

!SOCS Efficiency Curve Reports ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2I<\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multiefficiency\10Yrd ISbCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 Oi:18:06 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2I<\CALFILES\10YRO Soil SUM 012.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 03:57:02 - - -

Template: (SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom

Description:

lOYRb SUM 012 - - -

Comment: ISOCS:Cal Date 11/13/14 Detector: (3994)+(3996)+(3997)+(3998)+

Collimator: (GAROIAN Gl)+(GAROIAN Gl)+(GAROIAN_Gl)+(GARDIAN_Gl)+

Convergence: 1.00 % - -

Area [Sq Meters]: 1 1.0000e-004 (C)

Mass [Grams]: l.OOOOe+OOO (C)

Length [Metersl: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modifie.d by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final jf of Voxels 58.00 1.17 915e-010 10. 0 0.1151540 64000 59.54 2.24769e-010 10.0 0.1151540 64000

61. 00 3.88685e-010 10.0 0 .1151540 64000 311. OQ 6.39479e-007 10.0 0 .1151540 64000 311. 98 6.38967e-007 10.0 0 .1151540 64000 313.00 6.38710e-007 10.0 0 .1151540 64000 343.00 6.28623e-007 8.0 0 .1151540 64000 344.27 6.28092e-007 8.0 0 .11:51540 64000 345.0Q 6.27916e-007 8.0 0 .1151540 64000 660 .. 00 5.32497e-007 6.0 0 .1151540 64000 661.65 5.31683e-007 6.0 0 .1151540 64000

• 663. 00 5.31582e-007 6.0 0 .115154 0 64000 701. 00 5.24250e-007 6.0 0 .1151540 64000 702. 63 5,23754e-007 6.0 0. 115154 0 64000 703;00 5.23751e-007 6.0 0.1151540 64000 722. 00 5.20453e-007 6.0 0.1151540 64000 723. 00 5.20185e-007 6.0 0 .1151540 64000 724. 00 5.20077e-007 6.0 0.1151540 '64000 870.00 4.9970le-007 6.0 0.1151540 64000 871.10 4.99466e-007 6.0 0.1151540 6400'0 872. 00 4. 9966Qe-OQ7 6.0 0.1151540 64000 1172.00 4.78137e-007 4.0 0.1151540 64QOO 117'3. 22 4.78066e-007 4.0 0 .1151540 64000 1174.00 4.77843e-007 4.0 0 .1151540 64000 1273.00 4.72776e-007 4.0 0 .115154 0 64000 1274.45 4.7266le..,.007 4.0 0.1151540 64000 1275.00 4. 72612e-007 4. 0 0.1151540 64000 1331. 00 4.69100e-OQ7 4.0 0 .1151540 64000 1332. 49 4.69176e-007 4.0 0 .1151540 64000 1334. 00 4. 69014e-0.07 4.0 0 .1151540 64000 1406.00 4.62398e-007 4.0 0 .1151540 64000 1407.95 4.62312e-007 4.0 0 .1151540 64000 1409.00 4.62315e-007 4. 0 0 .1151540 64000 1460.80 4.57604e-007 4. 0 0.1151540 64000 TBD-401 Page 91 of 93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports lnte-rpolated Efflci!mcy Calibration Curve I El Measuriid - - Calculated J 7e-007 --

l 6e-007 ""-

~- -+-H-++

5e-007 4e-007 3e-007 2e-007 1e-001 I

0

_)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 92 of93

Attachment 10.2 ISOCS Efficiency Curve Reports Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve j O Measured - - Calculated j 1e-006 I

I 1e-007 I *-

I I I I **- -

I I

1e-OOB I

I I

I/

!/

I 1e-009 I) 1e-010 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 93 of93

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System Revision 0 Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots TBD-401 Page 1 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots GARD][AN SYSTEM Callibratfton Records.

MHF IP-1 &: IP-2 Intermodal Sttmmation TBD-401 Page 2of107

MHF STD Soil 11 18 14 11/17/2014 10:14:15 PM S~TJ;:lc~DAL STANDARD; DETOl; Position 1 2.646 3;527 4.409 10""5 10-6 I

'cf2. 10-7 1

>. I

(.) I*

I C. -

I I

(].) I

(.)

. c: - S1_ - - [~ -*'

ti= t0-8 w

10-9

-u Dl cc _/

CD I

(..)

.a~

0

-..J 102 103 Energy (keV)

MHF STD Soil 11 18 14 11/17/2014 10:15: 17 PM S~TEif-tf?DAL STANDARD; DET02; Position 1

• 2.646 3.527 4.409 1 Q-5

(

1Q-6 l I

I

~ 1Q-7 -i

~

(.)

c f Q.) . -.- --

I . z:z*

.o 1 Q-8 ti=

w en 0

0 UJ 10.;g_ s:

c a:

0 c

CJ) )>

m:::::

~~

-* :::r I I I I I CJ) 3

J CJ)

I ~ 3.

-u ~

102 103 [P

"'w Energy (keV)

MHF STD Soil 11 18 14 11/17/2014 10:17:04 PM SO~TE1o~DAL STANDARD; DET03; Position 1 2.646 3.527 4.409 1 Q-5 1 Q-6 I

- I

- I

'c>..

f!. 1 Q-7

(.)

c

(])

- I I

I

(.) .::..:..

r;'"'l -~~- .* - c --;

~ 1 Q-8 -

1 Q-9 iJ Dl

<C CD I I I I I 01 a I I 0

-..J 102 103 Energy (keV)

L_

MHF STD Soil 11 18 14 11/17/2014 10:18:01 PM S~TE1f[Jr>DAL STANDARD; DET04; Position 1 2.646 3.527 4.409 1 Q-5 1Q'."6

-I lll 0~

0

.J:,.. *-

~ _/ E

~ CJ

(.) l l

c 10-1 Q)

(.) I it=

w I

}

1 Q-8 J

-l I

-0 Ill cc Cl> I I I Ol 0 I 102 103

~

0

-..J Energy (keV)

MHF STD Soil 11 18 14 11/17/2014 10:19:04 PM SOIL; :m INL+/-JMOfcf~~ STANDARD; Sum of all segment spectra;.

2.646 3.527 4.409 1 Q-5

• o 10-6 * -

a::

>i

(.)

c

([)

.o 1 Q-7

~ .

r-~  ::z: c:c LU I I I

102 103 Energy (keV)

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots GAJRID)lIAN SYSTEM C aillfiIO Ir~mtn(()) nn Re~(()) 1ndl§ MHJF IP-1 & JfP-2 Jfnte1rmoclal Attacbed-o MHF Intennodal Wall Thiclmcss, IP-1 & 2 Specs.

o Gnnlinn Trailel' Wnll Thiclmes.s o Intel'lltodnl Positioning o Det. 1-4 Density 1.2 models, indivi<hml efficiency cnls, Smnmntion Cnl.

o Det. 1-4 Density 1.6 models, indM<lunl efficienc)' cnls, Sumnmtion Cnl.

o Def. 1-4 Density 2.0 models, inclMilunl efficiency cnls, Summntion Cnl.

o Dct 1-4 Sum Curves for Density 1.2, 1.6, & 2.0.

o Sum of nil Segment Spcctl'n Perforiuec1 b)' ,~AC/J:.{4;~ Dntc-;/,_,_/_-_./_,.'/_-_._l-17"'---

Rc\'icwcd by Jt-lfOv.k*v~r- Dnte_-"-/_/-_2._v_-~JY __

TBD-401 Page 8of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots MHF Intermodal Wall Thickness (Homogenized) 61" Wall Steel= 10 gauge= 0,1345" 230" x 60" = 13,800 in2 at 0.1345" thick

+ 3 Vertical Rails 60" x 15 = 2700 in2

+ 2 Horizontal support beam 480" = 960 in2

+ Chain guard 2"x2"x22" = 176 in2

+ ~100 lbs hardware 2,617*in2 3 2 o (if lOOlbs x 453.6g/Jb I 7.86g/cc = 5771cc = 352in /0.1345"=2617 in )

Total Area= 13800+2700+960+176+2617 = 20253 in2 Effective Thickness= 20253/1380-0 x 0.1345" thickness= 0.20" Steel TBD-401 Page 9of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots C&RP B-20 Appendix 8:1 Rev.O Page I of I Energy Solutions Main Trailer Wall.

Steel Cha~nel flattened= 7" Detector is positioned 14" behind the outside wall of the Main Trailer. Utilizing a 90 degree collimator will give a 28" diameter Field of View. Worst case positioning will place the detector between two of the channels, thus including both in the field of view. The channels also contain 0.5 by 2 3/8" rectangular holes which will not subtracted from the steel area thus being more conservative~

Material area Total area of the field of view: A = m.* 2 = rr142 = 615.75 in 2

• Area of flattened steel c;hannel: (7" x 18.8") + (1/2 7" x 3.525" x 2ends) x 2channels =312.55 in 2*

2 Atea of PVC: 615. 75 in - 312.55 in 2 = 303.. 20 in 2

• Area of trailer skin: 615.75 in 2

• Effective Thickness PVC= 1/16!'thick x (303.2/615.75) = 0.031" Steel = 1/16" thick x (312.55/615. 75} = 0.032" Al Skin= 1/~6" thick x 615.75/615.75) = 0.063" Homogenized Wall Density Total Effective wall thickness= 0.031+0.032 + 0.063 = 0.126" Density= 0.031/0.126*1.4g/cc PVC+ 0.032/0,126*7.86g/cc steel+ 0,063/0.126*2.7g/cc Al= 3.69 g/cc.

Material percentage= 0.344/3.69 = 9% PVC, 2.00/3.69=54% Steel, 1.35/3.69= 37% Al.

For Modeling purpos.es, the Main Trailer Wall (MTWall) (Absorber l} = 0.126" thick at 3.69 g/cc comprised of 9% PVC, S4% Steel and 37% Al.

TBD-401 Page 10 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots I

C&RPB-20 Appendix 8.2 Rcv.O

-Page I of I Energy Solutions Support Trailer Wall Sieel Channel flattened= 3 5/8" Detector is positioned 14'; behind the outside wall of the Support Trailer. Utilizing a_ 90 degree collimator will give a 28" dlamete-r field of View. Worst case positioning ';"ill place the detector between two of the channels, thus including both in the-field of view. The channels also contain o.s" by 2 3/8" rectangular holes which will not subtracted from the steel area thus being more conservative.

Material area Total area of the field of view: A == 7fr 2 = 7f14 2 = 615.75 in 2*

Area of flattened steel thannel: (3.625" x 11.28") +(1/2 3.625" x 2.775" x 2ends) x 2channels = 102 in 2

• Area of wood: 615. 75 in 2 -102 in 2 =513. 75 ih 2 ~

Area of trailer skin: 615.75 in 2*

Effective Thickness Wood_= 1/4" thick x (513.75/615.75) = 0.20_9" Steel = 1/1_6" thick x (102/615.75) = o.oio" Al Skin= 1/16" thick x 615.75/615.75) = 0.063" Homogenized Wall Density Total Effective Wall thickness= 0.209 + 0.010 + 0.063 = 0.282" Density= 0.209/0.282*0.75g/cc wood+ 0.010/0.282*7.86g/cc steel+ 0.063/0.282*2.7g/cc Al= l.44g/cc.

Material percentage_= 0.556/1.44 = 39% wood, 0.279/1.44=19% Steel, 0.603/1.44= 42% Al.

For Modeling purposes, the Support Trailer. Wall (STWall) (Absorber 1) =0.282" thick at Vl4g/cc comprised of 39% wood, 19% Steel and 42% Al.

TBD-401 Page 11of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots lntermodal IP-1 & IP-2

~

168" 41.S" I

I With Det +/- 57.5" t 115" I

55.5"standoff =FOV- 111" ~ 84" ~

~

14" L I

I l

85" TBD-401 Page 12 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 13 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 19 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 15 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 16of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 17of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This p*age contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 18of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 19 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 20 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 21 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 22 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 23 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 24 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 25 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots TBD-401 Page 26 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots GAIIDIAN SYSTEM Callilbratiion. Records MHF IP-1 & KP-2 Intermodal _)

Density2.0

\

TBD-401 Page 27 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS MulticCurve Efficiency Plots A

CANBE-RRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:14

==

Description:==

MHF_sm_SOIL_DET1_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_i3_14 File.Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF _sm _SOIL_DET1_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Xntegration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (inches)

No. ~ption**- d;1- ,,._ d;2: c -d;3;: f ,_ :d:<t; ~_d.5 .. - .-'.d;G'*.** '..*'Material *: Densltyi Reh:COnc.

1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 csteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Lliyer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirt! 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.02756 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generatli>n 58,0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312~0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 . 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 14Cl9.0 1460.8 jsn.IPLE sox j

• oo----,,-

1--------6.l

© 0

TBD-401 Page 28of107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Geometry Composer Report A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:14

==

Description:==

MHF_srn_SOIL_DET1_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 Fi le Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 29 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEdMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOI ISOCS/Lab~OCS 1ime: ~1/13/14 03:00:10 -

Genie Ca:l File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DETl 20.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:35:56 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF STD DETl 20 Comment: I SOCS: CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3994' - - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN_Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 3.5B81e+007 (C) t~ngth [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 2.49876e-011 10.0 -0.140676 81760 59.54 4.682Ble-011 10.. 0 -0.139760 81760

61. 00 7.95050e-011 10.0  :-0.138392 81760 311. 00 8.10604e-008 10.0 -0.019955 81760 311. 98 8.09781e-008 10.0 -0.019420 81760 313.00 8.09599e-008 10.0 -0. 019616 81760 343.00 7. 96462e-008 8.0 -0.017149 81760 344.27 7.95558e-008 8.0 -0.016964 81760 345.00 7.95516e-008 8.0 -0.017014 81760 660.00 6.57400e-008 6.0 -0.010410 81760 661.65 6.56224e-008 6.0 -0.010589 81760 663.00 6.56097e-008 6.0 -0.010200 81760 701.00 6.46329e-008 6.0 -0.010061 81760 702.63 6.45412e-008 6.0 -0.010248 81760 703.00 6.45537e-008 6.0 -0.010236 81760 722. 00 6.41027e-008 6.0 -0.010247 817qO 723.00 6.40636e-008 6.0 -0.010101 81760 724. 00 6.40506e-008 6.0 -0.010141 81760 870.00 6.12813e-008 6.0 -0. 009137 81760 871.10 6.12408e-008 6.0 -0.009192 81760 872. 00 6.12646~-008 6.o -0.009080 81760 1172.00 5.82074e-008 4.0 -0.007433 81760 1173.22 5.81753e-008 4.0 -0.007350 81760 1174.00 5.81511e-008 4.0 -0.007157 81760 1273.00 5.74669e-008 4.. 0 -0.006351 81760 1274 .45 5.74458e-008 4.0 -0.006582 81760 1275.00 5.74413e-008 4. 0 -0.006315 81760 1331. 00 5.70082e-008 4. 0 -0. 005966 81760 1332.49 5.69939e-008' 4. 0 -0.005833 81760 1334.00 5.69663e-008 4.0 -0.006223 81760 1406.00 5.60672e-008 4. 0 -0.004980 81760 1407.95 5.60634e-008 4.0 -0.005078 81760 1409.00 5.60761e-008 4.0 -0.005068 81760 1460.80 5.54286e-008 4.0 -0.004699 81760 TBD-401 Page 30 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve j D Measured - - Cale~

1e-007 8ec008 t.~

6e-008

~+#---l I

---M+9i I T 4e-008 2e-008 I

0 -

) 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 31 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve J o Measured - - Calculated J 1e-007

!)

I I

I I

I _,_ '-'--~

1e-008

I I

I I

1e-009 I ,_._ >-

J

, I/

/I

. 1e-010 -

1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Dalasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 32 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve EffiCiency Plots CANBEl~,RA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:59

==

Description:==

MHF_STp_SOJL_DITT__;,20 Comment: Calib 11/13/14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In,Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_Dm_zo.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN G1(CiARDIAN1 COLLIMATION MODEL) ,

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (1,6), CRPN = 24 (16) i:>imens!ons {inche5)

No;. c;f;l':* d;;r ,.(d;~*.  ;~;'t *dl!L  : ' ij;6' _* , f\'l~terlgil; *..'.~nsltV. B~ti (:tjij~

1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mlwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 gefnianuni 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 \ 660.0 661.7 663~0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722;0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.s 1334.0 i406.0 1407.9 1409,.0 1460.8 js1MPLE sox j L:

Do----.-

i-o-------,--~~l

©

© TBD-401 Page 33 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots

'omposer eport A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:59

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DITT_20 Comment: calib 11/13/14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DITT_20.geo Software: ISO CS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 34 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_STD.:__S01 ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:05:08 Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DET2 20.CAL Genie Cal Time: il/13/l4 04:19:32 - - - - '

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF STD DET2 20 Comment: ISOCS:CALIB 11/13/14 Detector: 3996 -

Collimator: GARDIAN_Gl Convergence:. 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters): 8.3097e+OOO (C)

M~ss [Grams]: 3.5881e+007 (C)

Length [Meters): not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %convergence Final # 6f Voxels 58.00 2.21412e-011 10.0 -0.132789 81760 59.54 4.18375e-011 10.0 -0.131275 81760

61. 00 7.153%e-Oil 10.0 -0. 1293'57 8l760 311. 00 8.05642e-008 10.0 -0.010783 81760 311. 98 8.04834e-008 10.0 -0.010302 81760 313.00 8. 04 663e-008, 10.0 -0. 010620 81760 343.00 7.91876e-008 8.. 0 -0.009344 81760 344.27 7.90987e-008 8,0r -0.009077 81760 345.00 7.90951e-008 8.0 -0.009236 81760 660.00 6.54683e-008 6.0 -0.-007340 81760 661.65 6.53515e-OQ8 6.0 -0.007470 817 6.0 663.00 6.53391e-008 6.0 -0.007098 81760 701.00 6.43732e-008 6.0 -0.007031 81760 702.63 6.42822e-008 6.0 -0. 007272 81760 703.00 6.42948e-008 6.0 -0.007160 81760 722. oo ~.38486e-008 6.0 -0. OQ7 l 98. 81760 723. 00 6. _38099e-008 6.0 -0.007153 8176,0 724.00 6.37971e-008 6.0 -0.007186 81760 870.00 6.10588e-008 6.0 -0.006087 81760 871.10 6.10186e-008 6.0 -0.006073 81760 872. 00 6.10424e-008 6.0 -0.005918 81760 1172.00 5.80243e-008 4.0 -0.003865 81760 1173.22 5. 7 9923e-008 4.0 -0.003731 81760 1174.00 5. 796839-008 4.0 -0.003471 81760 1273.00 5.72930e-008 4.0 -0.002482 81760 1274.45 5. 7272.le-008 4.0 -0.002809 81760 1275.00 5. 72676e-oo8 4.0 -0.002463 81760 1331. 00 5.68392e-008 4.0 -0.001970 81760 1332 .. 49 ,5. 68251e-008 4.0 -0.001852 81760 1334.00 5.67976e-008 4.0 -0.002246 8176.0 1406.00 5.59051e-008 4.0 -0.000826 81760 1407.95 5.59014e-008 4.0 -0.000960 81760 1409.00 5.59142e-008 4.0 -0. 001009 81760 1460.80 5.52712e-008 4.0 -0.000525 81760 TBD-401 Page 35 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I El Measured - - Calculated I 1.4e-007

~

1.2e-007 1e-007 l'ik1 ' l ---

---

+-++.h IT l

-Be-008 6e-008 4e-008 2e-008 I

0 o

") 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Da!asource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 36 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006 1e-007

"'=

- -1'1 "'-

I I

1e-ooa I I I

I I

v 1e-009 v

I J

1e-010 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01

(

TBD-401 Page 37 of 107

\ Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:10:29

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\lh-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_20.geo Software: ISOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Colllmator: GARDIAN .Gl (GARDIAN 1 C.OLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. DeStrlptl~i:i d;1 *.. cj;2 .* d~3.. .. ~;~::. .' .d.S: . '"*

d.6 f'l_ateria[ ** Density, Rel~Conc.

1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dlrt1 2 1.00 l

4 Absorber1 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4 6 Source*Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 3443 345.0 660~0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 ls1MPLE sox I 6.2 TBD-401 Page 38 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots G ometry mposer port A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:10:29

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 39 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD .SOl tSOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:09:42 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Sqil OET3 20.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04~42:54 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

STD SOIL DET3 20 Comment: ISOCS: CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3997 - - - -

Collimator: GA~DIAN Gl Convergertce~ 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 3.588le+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 3.35690e-011 10.0 -0.140207 81760 59.54 6.15083e-011 10.0 -0.139286 81760

61. 00 1.02424e~o10 10.0 -0.137916 81760 3'1.1. Ob 8.12054e-008 1q.o -0.019950 81760 311. 98 8.11217e-008 10.0 -0.019415 81760 313.00 8.11023e-008 10.0 -0.019611 81760 343.00 7.97579e-008 8.0 -0.017145 81760 344.27 7.96664e-008 8.0 -0. 016960 81760 345.00 7. 96616e-008 8.0 -0.017010 81760 6(50.00 6 .. 57685e-008 6.0 -0.010409 81760 661.65 6.56507e-008 6.0 -0.010588 81760 663.00 6.56380e-008 6.0 -0.010199 81760 701. 00 6.4659le-008 6.0 -0.010060 81760 702.63 6.4!:)673e-008 Ei. 0 -0.010247 81760 703.00 6.45798e-008 6.0 -0.010234 81760 122.oo 6. 41278e-008 6.0 -0.010246 B176Q 723. 00 6.40887e-008 6.0 -0.010100 81.760 724. 00 6.40757e-008 6.0 -0.010140 81760 870.00 6.13013e-008 6.0 -0.009136 81760 871.10 6.12608e-008 6.0 -0.009191 81760 872. 00 6.12846e-008 6.0 -0.009078 81760 1172.0Q 5.82231e-008 4. 0 -0.007432 81760 1173.22 5. 8191.0e-008 4.0 -0.007349 81760 1174.00 5.81668e-'008 4.0 -0.007156 81760 1273.00 5.74826e-008 4.0 -0.006350 81760 1274.45 5.74615e-008 4.0 -0.006581 81760 1275.00 5.7457Qe-008 4.0 -0.006314 81760 1331.00 5.70242e-008 4.0 -0.005965 81760 1332. 4 9 5.70099e-008 4.0 -0.005832 .81760 1334. 00 5. 69823e.-008 4.0 -0.00.6222 81760 1406.00 5.60838e-008 4.0 -0.004979 81760 1407.95 5.60800e-008 4.0 -0.005077 81760 1409.00 5. 60928.e-.008 4.0 -0.005067 81760 1460.80 5. 5445%-008 4.o -0.004698 81760 TBD-401 Page 40 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Erriciency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculaled I 1.6e-007 1.4e-007

~

1.2e-007

~111 r~-- ~Nl 1e-007 8e-008 ---

6e-008 J

4e-008 J

2e-008 J

0

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 41 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots lnterpoiated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculate(! I 1e-006 1e-007 lo- i--.. t-- k:1 h -

I I

v I

1e-008 I

I I*

I I

I 1 e-009 I ~ ~--

1e-010 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Da!asourc~: DET01 TBD-401 Page 42 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots IA CANBEF~RA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:11:39

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version:. (default)

Detector: 3998 C()llimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperatµre = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: ,;Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 2" (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. Dei;ciij>tlon. .. d.1 ** ~- ~d;?-: 'd;3*. *d.4 'di5.' .- .- (1,6' ... ,, *Material~ *oenslty. R~I;:q>nC:

1 Boie 0.2 230 61 85 c:steel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 none 3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirt! 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 3il.O 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 '1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332;5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 lsu.1PLE Box J Do---1~

6.3

---

6.l

© ,.,. I

© TBD-401 Page 43 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-C urve Efficiency Plots A

eometry Composer Report CAN A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:11:39

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 44 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF_STD_SOl ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: li/13/14 63:14:11 . - . ~

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DET4 20.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:45:53 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF STD DET4 20 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3998 - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 3.5881e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by Isacs (U) = Value modified by us~t

' Energy Ef f ieiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Vo~els 58.00 1.42266e-010 10.0 0.043834 81760 59.54 2.35740e-Q10 10.0 0.046117 81760

61. 00 3.60753e-Q10 10.0 0.048386 81760 311. 00 8.83735e-008 10.0 0.025769 81760 311. 98 8.82670e-008 10.0 0.025580 81760 313.00 8.81727e-008 10.0 0.025542 81760 343.0b 8.52944e-008 8.0 *0.0188b7 81760 344.27 8.51903e-008 8.0 0.018856 81760 345.00 8.51633e-OQ8 8.0 0.018577 81760 660.00 7.29918e-008 6. ci -0.005087 81760 661.65 7.28881e-008 6.0 -0.005192 81760 663.00 7.28870e-008 6.0 -0.005077 81760 701.00 7.19214e-008 6.0 -0.006307 81760 702.63 7.18730e-008 6.0 -0.006296 81760 703.00 7.18649e-008 6.0 -0.006323 8i760 722. 00 7 .14353.e-008 6.0 -0.006815 81760 723. oo* 7.14239e-008 6.0 -0.006744 81760 724. 00 7.14017e-008 6.0 -0.006985 81760 S7o.oo Ei.88278e-008 6.0 -0.009108 81760 871. 10 6.88089e-008 6.0 -0.008843 8176b 872. 00 6. 8.8170e-008 6.Q -0.009136 81760 1172.00 6.61894e-008 4. 0 . -0.010379 81760 1173.22 6.61901e-008 4.0 -0.010275 81760 1174.00 6.61584e-008 4. 0 -0. 010077 81760 1273.00 6.54372e-008 4.0 -0.010389 81760 1274.45 6.54260e-008 4.0 -0.010020 81760 1275.00 6.54166e-008 4.0 -0.010127 81760 1331.00 6.49469e-008 4.0 -0.010131 81760 1332.49 6. 49788e-00.8 4.0 -0. 0100.08 81760 1334.00 6.49619e-008 4.0 -0.009991 81760 1406.00 6.43762e-008 4.0 -0.009344 81760 1407.95 6.43428e-008 4.0 -0.009342 81760 1409.00 6.43252e-008 4.0 -0.009227 81760 1460.80 6.39156e-008 4.0 -0.009238 81760

/

TBD-401 Page 45 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.6e-007 I*

'1.4e-007

~

1.2e-007

~111

~ ~~l I TT 1e-007 Be-008 6e-008 4e-008 I

2e-ooa I 0

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy {keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 46of107 I_ _ _ _

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006 j

PG- '--- ',_

~

1e-007 I

I I

1e-008 1 \

I I

I I/

I I/

,/

1e-009 I

I 1e-010 10 100 1000 10000 Energy {keV) ciatasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 47of107

1. I i Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

~ght sa.ol 59;5j *61.ol 311.ol 31*2.oi 313.ol 343.ol 344.3! 345.0'. 660.oi 661.7 1 1.000 2.50e-011 4.68e-011 7.95e-011 8.11e-008 8.10e-008 8.10e-008 7.96e-008 7.96e-008 7.96e-008 6.57e-008 .6.56e-008 2 1:000 2.21e-011 4.18e-011 7.*15e-011 8.06e-008 8.05e-008 8.05e-008 7.92e-008 7.91e-008 7.9.1e-008 6.55e-008 6.54e-008 3 1.000 3.36e-011 6.15e-011 1.02e-010 8.12e-008 8.11e-008 8.11e-008 7.98e-008 7:97e-008 7.97e-008 6.58e-008 6.57e-008 4 1.000 1.42e-010 2.36e-010 3.61e-010 8.84e-008 8.83e-008 8.82e-008 8.53e-008 8.52e-008 8.52e-008 7.30e-008 7.29e-008 Sum 2.23e-010 3.86e-010 6.14e-010 3.31e-007 3.31e-007 3.31e-007 3.24e-007 3.24e-007 3.23e-007 2.70e-007 2.70e-007 Error,% 1.00e+001 1.00ef{)01 1.00ef{)01 1.00e+001 1.00e+001 1.00ef{)01 8.00e+OOO 8.00e+OOO 8.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00ef{)OO Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path MHF_STD_SOJL_DET1_20 Thu_Nov_13_02:59:18_2014 C:\GENIE2Kiisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_20 Thu_Nov_13_03:04:16_2014 C:\GENIE21<\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

3* MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_20 Thu_Nov.J3_03:08:50_2014 C:\GENIE21<\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 MHF_STD_SOIL_D_ET4:._20 Thu_Nov_13_03:13:19_2014 C:\GENIE21<\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

File Name File Stamp Path

Description:

MHF_STD_SoiLSUM_D20 Comment: Cal Date 11/13/14 A

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report (ii 0

(')

U) s:

c

~

0 c

Cl> )>

"U rn~

Dl co gi ~

Cl> -* :::T Cl> 3 CP

J CD

~a a -u~

~

0 oo U) w

-.J 1

MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 II Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:26:49

Primary Efficienc).' taken from ECC files, for set energies (keV):

663.ol 101.ol 102.6! 703.ol 722.0[ 723.0! 724.0! 870.0! 871.1 i 872.0l 1172.0[ 1173.2 6.56e-008 6.46e-008 6.45e-008 6.46e-008 6.41e-008 6.41e-008 6.41e-008 .6.13e-008 6.12&-008 6.13e-008. 5.82e-008 5.82e-008 6.53e-008 6.44e-008 6.43e-008 6.43e-008 6.38e-008 6.38e-008 6.38e-008 6.11e-008 6.10e-008 6~10e-008 5.80e-008 5.SOe-008 6.56e-008 6.47e-008 6.46e-008 6.46&-008 6.41e-008 6.41e-008 6.41e-008 6.13e-008 6.13e-008 6.13e-008 5.82e-008 5.82e-008 7.29e~008 7.19e-008 7.19e-008 7.19e-008 7.14e-008 7.14e-008 7.14e-008 6.88e-008 6.88e-008 6.88e-008 6,62e-008 6.62e-008 2.69e-007 .2.66e-007 2.65&-007 2.65e-007 2.64&-007 2.63e-007 2.63e-007 2.52e-007 2.52e-007 2;52&-007 2.41e-007 2.41e-007 6:00ei-OOO 6.00ei-000 6.00ei-000 6.00ei-000 6.00ei-000 6.00ei-000 6.00ei-000 6.00ei-000 6.0oe+ooo 6.00ei-000 4.00ei-000 4;.00ei-000 Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:IGENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:IGENIE2K\isocs\datalGEOMETRYlln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency da~a:

MHF_STD_Soil_SUM_D20 Cal Date 11 /13/14

~

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report "U

D>

cc CD

.j>.

(!)

0

~

0

-..J MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 II Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014; 03:26:49 2

Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

1174.ol 1273.ol 1274.4! 1275.0\ 1331.ol 1332.s: 1334.0i 1406.0; 1407.91 1409.0 1460.8 5.82e-008 5.75e-008 5.74e-008 5.74e-008 5.70e-008 5.70e-008 5.70e-008 5.61e-008 5.61e-008 5.61e-008 5.54e-008 5.80e-008 5.73e-008 5.73e-008 5.73e-008 5.68e-008 5.68e-d08 5.68e-008 5.59e"008 s:sse~oo8 5.59e-008 5.53e-008 5.82e-008 5.75e-008 5.75e-008 5.75e-008 5.70e-008 5.70e-008 5.70e-008 5.61e-008 5.61e-008 5.61e-008 5.54e-008 6.62e-008 6.54e-008 6.54e-008 6.54e-008 6.49e-008 6.SOe-008 6.SOe-008 6.44e-008 6.43e-008 6.43e-008 6.39e-008 2.40e-007 2.38e-007 2.38e.007 2.38e-007 2.36e-007 2.36e-007 2.36e-007 2.32e-007 2.32e-007 2.32e-007 2.30e-007 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.0oe+aoo* 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for inpµt ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\lncSitu\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information .for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_STD_Soil_SUM_o;m

-I Cal Date 11/13/14 CD 0

J,..

0

~

Multi-Efficienc

-u D>

co Cl>

(11 0

a~

0

-...J MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 II Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:26:49 3

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multiefficiency\MHF S~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:27:03 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil SUM D20.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:49:l4 - - * -

Template: (SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom

Description:

HMF STD SUM D20 - - -

Comment: ISOCS:Cal Date 11/13/14 Detector: (3994)+(3996)+(3~97)+(3998)+

Collimator: (GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+

Convergence: 1.00 % - - .. -

Area [Sq Meters]~ l.OOOOe-004 (C)

M.ass [Grams] : 1. OOOOe+OOO (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 2.22964e-010 10.0 0.0438340 v 64000 59.54 3.85914e-010 10.0 0.0438340 64000

61. 00 6.14222e-b10 10.0 0.0438340 64000 311. 00 3.31203e-007 10.0 0.0438340 64000 311. 98 3.30850e-007 10.0 Q.0438340 64000 313.00 3.30701e-007 10.0 0.0438340 64000 343.00 3.23886e-007 8.0 0.0438340 64000 344.27 3.23511e-007 8.0 0.0438340 64000 345.00 3.23472e-007 8,0 0.0438340 64000 660.00 2.69969e-007 6.0 0.0438346 64000 661. 65 2. 69513e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 663.00 2.69474e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 701.00 2. 65587e-0*07 6.0 0.0438340 64000 702.63 2.65264e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 703.00 2.65293e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 722.00 2.63514e-007 q.O 0. 043.834.0 64000 723. 00 2.63386e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 724. 00 2.63325e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 870.00 2.52469e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 871.10 2.52329e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 872. 00 2.52409e-007 6.0 0.0438340 64000 1172.00 2.40644e-007 4.6 0.0438340 64000 1173.:22 2.40549e-OQ7 4,0 0.0438340 64000 1174.00 2.40445e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 1273.00 2.37680e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 1274.45 2.37605e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 1275.00 2.37583e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 1331.00 2.35818e-007 4. 0 0.0438340 64000 1332.49 2.35808e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 1334. 00 2.35708e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 1406.00 2.32432e-007 4. 0 0.0438340 64000 1407.95 2.32388e:..oo7 4. 0 0.0438340 64000 1409.00 2.32408e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 1460.80 2.30061e-007 4.0 0.0438340 64000 TBD-401 Page 51 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measurl!d - - Calculale~ I 3.5e-007

~

3e-007

~

~~ I 2.5e-007 I

---,*tt 2e-007 1.5e-007 I

1e-007 5e-008 I

0 0

z) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 52 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Callbratlon Curve

[ o Measured - - Calculaled I 1e-006 rlln

- -~-

I *~* - -

1e-007 I

f --

I I

1e-008 I

I I

/

J I/

1e-009 1e-010 10 100 1000 10QOO Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 53 of 107

Attachment.10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots GARDIAN SYSTEM Calli1bratioll1l Record§ MHF IP-1 & IP-2 Intermodal Density 1.6 TBD-401 Page 54 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:00

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_16.geo Software: ISO CS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl {GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: = =

Convergence 1.00%, MDRPN 24 (16), CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (inches)

No. .* DesCl:ijJtion d;l, *:d;2 .'* *d;3' .. d'A: d;S .. . ' .d:6: *.. ** Materla!' .* *oen*sltY .Ret; ~con:c;*

1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 source - Bottom Layer 56 ' dirtl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Abs9rber2 0.02756 germanum 5.4 6 Source* Detector 55.5. 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.S 61.0 311.Q 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.S 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 js1MFLE s.ox I y IL:

Do--~~

---

6.l 0

0 6.2 6.4...---:;;

r-6L A TBD-401 Page 55 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

Geometry Composer Report A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:00

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 Fiie Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 56 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\rn~situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOJ ISOCS/LabSOCS Time~ 11/13/14 02:57:59 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DETl 16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:34:55 - - .

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF STD DETl 16 Comment: ISQCS: CAL DATE_l1_13_14 Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN_Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.8705e+007 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calc~lated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 3,12367e-Oll 10.0 0.176087 81760 59.54 5.85305e-011 10.0 0.163146 81760 61.00 9. 93642e-011 10.0 0.152347 81760 311. 00 1.00814e-007 10.0 -0.021565 81760 311. 98 1.00714e-007 10.0 -0. 021104 81760 313.00 l.00691e-007 10.0 -0.021551 81760 343.00 9.90373e-008 8.0 -0.023355 81760 344.27 9.89250e-008 8.0 -0.023157 81760 345.00 9.89169e-008 8.0 -0.023358 81760 660.00 8.15883e-008 6.0 -0.025608 81760 661.65 8. 14 412e-008. 6.0 -0.025749 81760 663.00 8.14289e-008 6.0 -0.025400 81760 701.00 8.01935e-Ci08 6.0 -0.025135 81760 702.63 8.00826e-008 6.0 -0.025316 81760 703.00 8.00976e-008 6.0 -0.025343 81760 722. 00 7. 95294e-0.08. 6.0 -0.025267 81760 723. 00 7.94792e-008 6.0 -0.025071 81760 724. 00 7.94637e-008 6.0 -0.025102 81760 870.00 7. 59700e-o*os 6.0 -0 .. 023477 81760 871.10 7,59220e-OQ8 (?. 0 -0.023394 81760 872. 00 7.59474e-oos 6.0 -0.023274 81760 1172.00 7.207lle-008 4.0 -0.020161 81760 1173.22 7.20275e-008 .4. 0 -0.020Q73 81760 1174.00 7.19963e-008 4.0 -0.019895 81760 1273.00 7.11249e-008 4.0 -0.018839 81760 1274.45 7 .10986e-008 4.0 -0.019015 81760 1275.00 7.10939e-008 4.0 -0.018857 81760 1331. 00 7.05470e-008 4.0 -0.018274 81760 1332.49 7.05266e-008 4. 0 -0.018189 81760 13J4 .. Ob 7.04885e-008 4. 0 -0. 018.4 98 81760 1406.00 6. 93572e-008 4. 0 -0.017341 81760 1407.95 6.93491e-008 4.0 -0.017367 81760 1409.00 6.93658e-008 4. 0 -0,017276 81760 1460.80 6.85559e-008 4.0 -0.016776 81760 TBD-401 Page 57 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve

1. D Measured -*- - Calctilaled I 1.2e-007 1e-007

~ ~~II 8e-008

(!Ff=

~J l T 6e-008 4e-008 2e-008 I

0

_)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Dcitasourc!;l: DET01 TBD-401 Page 58 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve J D Measured - - Calculated J 1e-006 1e-007

.... .,. I-I-

I I

v 1e-008 I

I

-f I

1e-009

/

-- ,-~

i/

j 1e-01 o 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 59 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Cuive Efficiency Plots LA CANBE;RRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:44

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_16 Comment: calib Date 11/13/14 Fil~ Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_16.geo Software: ISOCS Template: SIMPLE-'-BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Enuironment: Temperature= 65 °F, Pressure= 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity= 70%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

.Nil~. Descri>.tlon c;U d.2 di3.: . 'd*en~ltY* .Rel;,ep!l:C; 1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 \ dirtl 1.6 1.00 4 . Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficlencv curve generation 58.0 .59.S 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 ls11.1PLE sox I '(

l::

Do--t~

6.3 6.2

..~I TBD-401 Page 60 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:44

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_16 Comment: calib Date 11/13/14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Sltu\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 61 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOME~RY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOl ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:03:35 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIEiK\CALFILES\HMF ST~ Soil DET2 16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:38:26 - ~ -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF STD DET2 Hi Comment: ISOCS:CALIB DATE 11/13/14 Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+dOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.8705e+007 (C)

Length [Meteis] : not used (C} = Value calculated by !SOCS (U) = Value modified by user

'i Energy Efficiency %Uncerta.inty  %<;::orivergenc;e Final # bf Voxels 58.00 2. 76775e-011 10.0 0.191809 817.60 59.54 5.22905e-011 10.0 .0.180106 81760

61. 00 8.94047e-011 10.0 0.170357 81760 311. 00 1.00180e-007 10.0 0.003898 81760 311. 98 1. 00082e--007 10.0 0.004259 81760 313.00 l.00061e-007 10.0 0.003663 81760 343.00 9.84523e-008 8.Q -0.000715 81760 344.27 9.83420e-008 8.0 -0.000519 81760 345.00 9.83347e-008 8.0 -0.000855 81760 660.00 8.12464e-008 6.0 -0.021893 81760 661.65 8.lld03e-008 6.0 -0.022030 81760 663.00 8.10884e-008 6.0 -0.021759 81760 701. 00 7.98674e-008 6.0 -0.022656 81760 702.63 7.97573e-008 6.0 -0.022874 81760 703.00 7. 97723e-008 6.0 -0.022865 81760 722. 00 7.92106e-008 6.0 -0.023278 81760 72'.?. oo 7.91608e-008 6.0 -0.023191 81760 724. 00 7.91457e-008 6.0 -0.023233 81760 870.00 7.56926e-008 6.0 -0.024652 81760 871.10 7.56451e-008 6 .. 0 -0.024558 81760 872. 00 7.56705e-008 6.0 -0.024424 81760 1172.00 7.18459e-008 4.0 -0.024722 81760 1173.22 7.18026e-008 4.0 -.0 ..024620 81760 1174.00 7.17715e-OOi3 4.0 -0.024424 81760 1273.00 7. 0912oe-'008 4.0 -0.024037 81760 1274.45 7.08859e-008 4..0 -0.024270 81760 1275.00 7.08812e-008 4.0 ....:0.024150 81760 1331. 00 7.03406e-008 4. 0 -'0.023778 81760 1332.49 7.03204e-Od8 4.0 -0.023752 81760 1334.00 7.Q2825e-008 4.0 -0.0.24043 81760 1406.QO 6.91598e-008 4.0 -0.023170 81760 1407.95 6.91519e-008 4. 0 -0.023208 81760 1409.00 6.91687e-008 4. 0 -0.023168 81760 1460.80 6.8.3646e-Od8 4.0 -0.022862 81760 TBD-401 _Page 62 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency CaUbration Curve J o Measured - - Calculated I 1e-007 I

8e-008

• ~ ./

6e-008

~+N I -~.L1

, I T 2e-008 I

0 ..:.

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV}

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 63 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Caiibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculat~]

1e-007 I

I 1---

I I

1e~ooa "-~

v I

I I

-- I 1e-009 I

I/

I I v

I 1e-010 1-~

1e-011 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 64 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots CANBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 20t4 - 17:10:12

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DEf3_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_SfD_SOIL_DEf3_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL) ,

Environment: = =

Temperature 65 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN 24(16), CRPN 2'4 (16)

Dimensions (Inches}

No. Desqiption' d~l ... ~;2 . d.* ~'. d,4* 'd;,5,: ,*. .~;6,'_.  !"fil!i!i:lill; __ 'l:>~o~t:V ,Rel.: cont; 1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 csteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 source - Bottom tayer 56' dlttl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4 G Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8

~11.!FLE BOX I y L::

I .,,,.,..-:

I _....-;;--"

___ l/Rr-*--6.l .© 6.3

© 6,2 6.4,...--;;,

-r-6L A TBD-401 Page 65 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

Geometry .ornposer eport CA A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:10:12

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 66 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOM~TRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOI ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03: 08: 10 I - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STO Soil DET3 16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:41:51 . - - . - - ..

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

STD SOIL DET3 16 Conuuent: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3997 - - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN G1 Convergence: 1.00 %

.Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.8705e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (Cf = Value calculated by !SOCS (U) = Value modified by user I

Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final JI of Voxels 58.00 4 .19632e-011 10.0 .. 0.173868 .81760 59.54 7. 6877le-011 10.0 0.161047 81760 61.00 1. 28004e-010 10.0 0.150373 81760 311. 00 l.00994e-007 10.0 j-0.021570 81760 311. 98 l.00892e-007 81760 /

10.0 :0. 021110 313.00 l.00868e-007 10.0 ~0.021557 81760 343.00 9.9176le-008 8.0 -0.023359 81760 344.27 9.90624e-008 8.0 -0.023160 81760 345.00 9.90536e-008 8.0 .:...o. 023362 81760 660.00 8 .. 16237e-Q08 6.0 "-0.025607 81760 661.65 8.14763e-008 6.0 -0.'025749 81760 663.00 8.14639e-008 6.0 -'-0. 025399 81760 701. 00 8.02260e-008 6.0 -0.025135 81760 702.63 8. 01150e-008 6.0 -;-0.025316 81760 703.00 8.01300e-008 6.0 -0.025342 81760 722.00 7.95606e-008 6.0 -0.025266 81760 723. 00 7.95103e-008 6.0 .:.0.025011 81760 724. 00 7.94948e-008 G.O -0.025101 81760 870.00 7.59948e-008 6.0 -;-0.023476 81760 871. 10 7.59469e-008 6.0 -0.023393 81760 872. 00 7.59722e-008 6.0 -;-0.023273 81760 1172.00 7.20906e-008 4.0 -0.020160 81760 1173.22 7.20469e-008 4.0 ...,.o. 020072* 8176.0 1174.00 7.20157e-008 4.0 -'-0.019895 81760 1273.00 7 .11444e~oo8 4. 0 -,0.018838 81760 1274.45 7.11180e-008 4. 0 -0.019014 81760 1275.00 7.11133e-008 4.0 -0.018856 8i760 133;1..00 7.05669e-008 4.0 ..:o.018273 81700 1332.49 7.05465e-008 4.0 -0.018188 81760 1334. 00 7.05084e-008 4.0 -0.018497 81760 1406.00 6.93777e-008 4. 0 -0.017340 81760 1407.95 6.93697e-008 4.0 --,0.017366 81760 1409.00 6.93865e-008 4.0 ~o. 011215 81760 1460.80 6.85773e-008 4.0 -0.016774 81760 TBD-401 Page 67 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Callbration Curve I I 1e-007 D

Measured - - , Calculated I

8e-008 r~

6e-008

~4 -r. _[ J _.I. .l T

IY-1 T I

4e-008 I

2e-008 I  !

0

) '

I 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Energy (k~V)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 68of107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efriciency Callbratlon Curve I D Measured --1calculated I 1e-007

• • ~

• t<-i...r.

t I

I v

• 1e-008 I -* - -~

I

) I I

I I

I 1e-009 I

• I  :

I I 1 e-01.0 --

I 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 69 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots

/)~

CANBEl~l~A DatE_!: Thur5day, November 13, 2014 - 17:11:25

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In~Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Collim<!tor: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relatjve Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 2~ (16)

Dimensions (inches) :

.d,1 .. .

l\!O. oesq1p~ori *d*2  ;

.~i3 *,',d*4' '"'-i ':d,5 cl.-6! : . . Ma~iia!. * ~Dehslt:Y. Rekcoiit.*

1 Box 0.2 230 61 ' BS esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 i none 3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 I dlrtl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorberl 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absoroer2 none 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 ' 0 Lisi: of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 . 663.0 701.0 I 702.6 703.0 722.o 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 js11.1PLE eo_x j Do----

6.3

,,.l TBD-401 Page 70 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

Geometry omposer eport CA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:11:25

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 71 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS I

ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GE0ME~RY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOI ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:12:44 I - - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DET4 16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 1)_/13/14 04:44:55 -  : - .

Template: SIMPLE BOX

~~om Descripti6n: HMF STD OET4 16 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097~+000 (C)

Mass [Grains]: 2. 870'5e+007 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U} = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence. Final # ~f Voxels 58.00 l.77637e-010 10. 0 To.224842 81760 59.54 2.94312e-010 10.0 -:-0.213056 81760 61.00 4.50364e-010 10.0 .:..0.202258 81760 311. 00 l.09841e-007 10.0 10.025382 81760 311. 98 l.09716e-007 10.0 -i-0.025292 81760 313.00 1.09593e-007 10.0 -0.025087 81760 343.00 1.0600le-007 8.0 -;-0.024978 81760 344.27 l.05872e-007 8.0 ..:..o. 024483 81760 345.00 l.05832e-007 8.0 -;-0.024774 81760 660.00 9.05776e-008 6.0 -'-0.022321 81760 661.65 9.04469e-008 6.0 _:.0,022381 81760 663.00 9.04425e-008 6.0 -0.022238 81760 701.00 8.92289e-008 6.0 10.022424 81760 702.63 8.91712e-008 6.0 -0.022355 81760 703.00 8.91625e-008 6.0 -'0.022435 81760 722. 00 8. 8620'~e-008 6.0 .l0,0,22430 81760 723.00 8.86058e-008 6.0 -0.022480 ~1760 724. 00 8.85783.e-008 6.0 ~0.022634 81760 870.00 8. 53372.e-008 6.0 -r0.022560 81760 871.10 8.53120e-008 6.0 -;0.022292 81760 872. 00. 8.53215e-008 6.0 -0.022468 8.1760 1172. 00 8.19703e-008 4.0 Jo.021828 81760 1173.22 8.19640e-008 4,0 ..:0.021687 81760 ll74.00 8.19268e-008 4.0 J0.021457 81760 1273.00 8.09978e-008 4.0 -0.021443 81760 1274.45 8. 09813e-008 4.0 -0.021349 81760 1275.00 8.09696e-008 4. 0 -0. 021141 81760 1331,00 8.03774e-008 4. 0 -0. 021152 81760 1332. 49 8,0409Eie-008 4.0 __10.021075 81760 1334.00 8.0385le-008 4.0 -Q. 021115 81760 1406.00 7.96422e-008 4.0 -;0. 020245 81760 .

1407.95 7.95991e-008 4.0 -0.020295 81760 1409.00 7.95752e-008 4.0 -:o. 020214 81760 1460.80 7.90476e-008 4.0 -:o. 020145 81760 TBD-401 Page 72 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots

I Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - :calculated /

I 1e-007 i

I I* I

-~  :

Se-008

'~

I I

I

--?-~+-?-?

6e-008 4e-008 I

2e-008

/ I 0

0

_)

500 1000 i

i I

I 1500 2000 2500 I

Energy (k~V)

I Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 73 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots I .

Interpolated EHiciency Calibration Curve J D Measured _ _ :Calculated J 1e-007

/* -

I

(

I I

I 1e-008 I I

I I I

/ i I/ - - --

I

/

I fo-009 I

I

[/

I '

l

(

I 1e-010

. 10 100 10QO 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 74 of 107

f Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

____i Weight i 58.o 59.51 61.ol 311.ol 312.ol 313.ol '343.0 344,31 345.o; 6so.ol 661.7 1.000 3.12e-011 5.85e-011 9.94e-011 1.01e-007 1.01e-007 1.01e-007 9.SOe-008 9.89e-008 9.8_9e-008 8.16e-008 8.14e-008 2 1.000 2.77e-011 5.23e-011 8.94e-011 1.00e-007 1.00e-007 1.00e-007 9.85e-008 9.83e-008 9.83e-008 8.12e-008 8.11e-008 3 1.000 4.20e-011 7.69e-011 1.28e-010 1.01e-007 1:01e-007 1.01e-007 9.92e-008_ 9:91e-008 9.91e-008 8.16e-008 8.15e-008 4 1:000 1.78e-010 2.94e-010 4.50e-010 1.10e-007 1.10e-007 1.10e-007 1.06e-007 1.06e-007 1.06e-007 9.06e-008 9.04e-008 Sum 2.79e-010 4.82e-010 7'..67e-010 4.12e-007 4.11e"007 4.11e-007 4.03e-007 4.02e-007 4.02e-007 3.35e-007 3.34e-007 Error,% 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 1.00e-1{)01 8.00e-1{)00 8.00e-1{)00 8.00e-1{)00 6.00e-1{)00 6.00e-1{)00 Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path 1 MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_16 Thu_Nov 13 02:57:07_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_16 Thu_Nov_13_03:02:43_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\G-EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

3 MHF_STD_S_QIL_DET3_16 Thu_Nov_13_03:07:18_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 MHF..:_STD_SOIL_DET4_16 Thu_Nov_13_03:11:52_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

File Name File Stamp Path

Description:

MHF_STD_Soil_SUM_D16 Comment: Cal Date 11/13/14 A

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiencv Report Ci5 0

()

CJ) s::

c csc CD )>

-0 m:::i:

Ill

<O ~~

-* ::r CD

-..J CD 3

J CD c.n .,52 3.

s....... -0 ......

i5' 0 0

-..J Cit w MultiEfficiency Report/Style21/ Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:25:27 1

Primarv Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies (~:

663.oi 701.0i 702.6! 703.0\ 722.0j 723.o: 724.0l 870.0! 871.1i 872.0 1172.0! 1173.2 8:14e-008 8.02e-008 8.01e-008 8.01e"008 7.95e-008 7.95e-008 7.95e-008 7.6-0ecOOB 7.59e-008 7.59e-008 7.21e-008 7.20e-008 8.11e-008 7.99e-008 7.98e-008 7.9~008 7,92e-008 7.92e-008 7.91e-008 7.57e-008 7.56e-008 7.57e-008 7*.18e-008 7.18e-008 8.15e-008 8.02e-008 8.01e-008 8.01e-008 7.96e-008 7.95e-008 7.95e-008 7.60e-008 7,59e-008 7.60e-008 7.21e-008 7.20e-008 9.04e-008 8.92e-008 8.92e-008 8.92e-008 8;86e-008 8.86e-ooa 8.86e-008 8.53e.:ooa 8.53e"008 a:53e-ooa 8.20e-008 8.20e-008 3.~007 3.30e-007 3.29e-007 3.29e-007 3.27e-007 3.27e-007 3.27e-007 3.13e-007 3.13e"007 3.13e-007 2.9~007 2.98e-007 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.0oe+Ooo 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2Klisocs\da_ta\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:IGENIE2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file.with multiefficiency data:

MHF_STD_Soil_SUM_D16

• Cal Date 11113/14 kA.

~AN BERRA Multi-Efficiency Report "U

Ol co

(])

-.J en 0

0

-.J MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:25:27 2

Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for setenergies ~:

1174.o: 1273.oi 1214.41

• 1275.o! 1331.ol 1332~5[ 1334.0! 1406.0: 1407.9i 1409.01 1460.8 7.20e-008 7.11e-008 7.11e-008 7.11e-008 7.05e-008 7.05e-008 7.0Se-008 6.94e-008 6.93e-008 6.94e-008 6.86e"008 7.18e-oo8 7.09e-008 7.09e-008 7.09e-008 7.03e-008 7.03e-008 7.03e-008 6.92e-Ob8 6.92e-008 6.92e-008 6.84e-008 7.20e-008 7~11e-008 7.11e-008 7.11e-008 7.06~*008 7.05e-008 7.05e-Q08 .6.94e-008 6.94e-008 6.94e-008 6.86e-008 8.19e-008 8.10e-008 8.10e-008 8.10e-008 8.04e-008 8.04e-008 8.04e-008 7:96e-008 7.96e-008. .7.96e-008 7.9oe,oos 2.98e-007 2.94e-007 2.94e-007 2.94e-007 2.92e-007 2.92e-007 2.92e-007 2.SSe-007 2.87e-007 2.87e-007 2185e-007 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE.:_BOX\

Information *for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF:_STD_Soil_SUM_D16 Cal Date 11/13/14

~NBERRA Multi-Efficiencv Report MultiEfficien~y Report/Style2 //Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:25:27 3

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\<::lata\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multiefficiel)cy\MHF S'l ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:25:39 . -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil SUM 016.CAL Geni~ Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:48:16 - - -

Temp.late: (SIMPLE BOX)+ (SIMPLE BOX)+ (SIMPLE BOX)+ (SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom

Description:

HMF STD SUM D16 - - -

Comment: I SOCS: Cal Date 11/13/14 Detector: (3994)+(3996)+(3997)+(3998)+

Collimator: (GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+

Convergence: 1.00 % - - - -

Area [S~ Meter~]: 1.0000e-004 (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.0000e+OOO (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 2. 78514e-010 10.0 0.1918090 64000 59.54 4. 82010e-010 10.0 0.1918090 64000

61. 00 7.67137e'--010 10.0 0.1918090 64000 311. 00 4 .11829e-007 10.0 0.1918090 64000 311. 98 4 .11404E!-007 10.0 0.1918090 64000 313. 00 4 .11213e-007 10.0 0.1918090 64000 343.00 4.02667e-007 8.0 0.1918090 64000 344.27 4.0220le-007 8.0 0.1918090 64000 345.00 4.02137e-007 8.0 o.i918o9o 64000 660.00 3.35036e-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 661. 65 3 .. 34 4 65e-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 663.00 3.34424e-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 701.00 3.29516e-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 702 .. 63 3.2912Eie-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 703.00 3.29162e-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 722.00 3.2692le-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 723.06 3.26756e-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 724. 00 3.26682e-007 6.0 0 .19180.90 64000 870.00 3.12995e-007 6.0 0.1918090 640@

871.10 3.12826e-007 6.0 0.1918090 64000 872. 00 3. 12 912e-00'7 (i. 0 0.1918090 64000 1172.00 2.97978e-007 4. 0 0.1918090 64000 1173.22 2.97841e-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 1174.00 2.97710e-oo7 4.0 0.1918090 6.4000 1273.00 2.94179e-007 4. 0 0.1918090 64000 1274.45 2. 94084e-007 4. 0 0.1918090 64000 1275.00 2.94058e"-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 1331.00 2.91832e-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 1332.49 2.91803e-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 1334. 00 2.91665e-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 1406.00 2.87537e-007 4. 0 0.1918090 64000 1407.95 2.87470e-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 1409.00 2.87496e-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 1460.80 2.84545e-007 4.0 0.1918090 64000 TBD-401 Page 78of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 5e-007 4e-007 I* ,

I~

3e-007 l'k_ I ir-?=t t 2e-007 1e-007 J

0 0

) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 79 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measu;ed - - Calculate9 I 1e-006

~.

I 1.e-007 I -

I I

I 1e-008 I -~

--t-I I

I I

1e-009 1e-010 10 100 1000 10000, Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 80 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots GARDIAN SYSTEM Calliilbnrantiion Re~ordl§ MHF IP-1 & JIP-2 Intermodal Density 1.2 TBD-401 Page 81 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

CANBERt~A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:07:30

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\Mi-JF_STD_SOIL_DET1_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No.* Description . d;~ d.2 tl*3 . '.d.4: !J*S_ .. :: d:G

• f.1~terial - pen~ltf.' Rql~ q>nc:

1 Box 0.2 230. 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer S6 dirt! 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 int.wall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.02756 germanum S.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.S 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency cmve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 js11.!FLE eox / y L:::

'Do----.-

6.3 i----------6.l

©

• 0 6.2

..-I TBD-401 Page 82 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

Geon1etry omposer R Ort RA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:07:30

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 83 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOJ ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 02:56:24 - - .

Genie C::al File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DETl 12,CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 o4;33:28 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF STD DETl 12 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3~94 - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.1529e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 4;15405e-011 10.0 -0 .112929 91980 59.54 7.78247e-011 10.0 -0.113004 91980

61. 00 l.32108e-010 10.0 -0 .112798 91980 311. 00 l.332Q8e-007 10.0 -0.068607 91980 311.98 l.3308le-007 10.0 -0.068161 91980 313. 00 l.33047e-007 10.0 -0.068302 91980 343.00 l.3083le-007 8.0 -0. 066094. 91980 344.27 l.30684e-007 8.0 -0.065931 91980 345.00 l.30:668e-007 8.0 -0.065958 91980 660.00 1. 0749le.-007 6.0 -0.046395 91980 661.65 1. 07297e-007 6.0 -0.046403 91980 663.00 1. 07286e-007 6.0 -0.046163 91980 701. 00 l .*05613e-007 6.0 -0.044700 91980 702.63 l.05475e-007 6.0 -0.045028 91~80 703.00 l.0549le-007 6.0 -0.044993 91980 722. 00 1. 04726e-007 6.0 -0.044413 91980 723. 00 1. 04658e-007 6.0 -0.044329 91980 724. 00 I. 04637e-007 6.0 -0.044340 91980 870.00 9.99225e-008 6.0 -0.040962 91980 871. 10 9.98635e-008 6.0 -0.040929 91980

?72. 00 9.98883e-008 6.0 -0.040878 9i98'0 1172. 00 9. 46111e-008 4. 0 -0.037512 91980 1173.22 9 . 4 5 4 9'8 e- 0 0 8 4.0 -0.037432 91980 1174.00 9.45068e-008 4.0 -0.037359 91980 1273.00 9;33125e-008 4. 0 -0.036299 91980 1274.45 9.32786e-008 4.0 -0.036724 91980 1275.0Q 9.32735e-008 4.0 -0.036563 91980 1331.00 9.25305e-008 4.0 -0.036077 91980 1332.49 9.25018e-008 4.0 -0.036043 91980 1334.00 9.24434e-008 4.0 -0.036217 91980 1406.00 9. 0923.6e-008 4.0 -0.035386 91980 1407;95 9.09060e-008 4.0 -0.035390 91980 1409 .. 00 9.09277e-OQ8 4.0 -0.035442 91980 1460.80 8.98473e-008 4.0 -0.035059 91980 TBD-401 Page 84 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculale<I I 1.4e-007

,'~

1.2e-007 1e-007

~r I I ----

l-4+-tt Be-008 6e-OOB -

4e-008 2e-008 I

0 -'-

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy {keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 85 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots lnterpol<1ted Efficiency Calibration Curve I G Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006

'"~

- -rih.. ,___

I I

1e-008 I

~-

I I

I 1e-009 I

I I{ '

1e-010 1e-011 10 100 1000 10000

) Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 86 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

G CANBEl-i!RA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:29

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_12 Co mment:. calib. Date 11/13/14 fil e Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_12.geo Software: ISOCS Te mplate: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

De teci:or: 3996 Col limator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

En vironment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 {16)

Dimensions (inches)

.-No.

Description:

.d.1' "d;2 di~ d;4: 'd.5' '.):6 ., fJJ at~ri.aJ * -* ;Density R¢1; C~O,,c; 1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source.- Top Layer 0 <none>

3 source - Bottom Layer 56 dirt! .1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5' 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency cunte generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663:0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 jsn.tPLE eox I Do--~~

6.3

..,.1 TBD-401 Page 87 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Cu rve Efficiency Plots G ometry Composer A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:08:29

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_12 Comment: Calib. Date 11/13/14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 88of1 07

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C: \GENIE2K\isocs\da.ta \GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF_$TD_ S01 ISOCS/LabSOCS Tlme; 11/13/14 03:01:50 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DET2 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:37:29 - - - '

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF STD DET2 12 Comment: ISOCS:CALIB. DATE 11/13/14 Detector: 3996 -

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: $.3097e+OOO (C)

Mas~ [Grams]: 2.1529e+Q07 (C)

Length [Metia.rs]: not used (C) = Value calctilat~d by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 3.68042e-011 10. () -0.122626 91980 59.54 6. 95213e-011 10.0 -0.123519 91980

61. 00 1.18855e-010 10.0 -0.123962 91980 311.00 1.32364e-007 10.0 -0.101613 91980 311. 98 1; 32-239e-007 10.0 -b. 101154 91980 313. 00 1.322Q8e-007 10.0 -0.10i345 91980 343.00 l.30051e-007 8.. 0 -0.098883 91980 344.27 1.29907e-007 8.0 -0.098567 91980 345.00 1.29892e-007 8.0 -0.098676 91980 660.00 1.07037e-007 6.0 -0. 074511 91980 661. 65 1.06844e-007 6.0 -0.074510 91980 663.00 1. 06834e-007 6.0 -0. 07425,2 91980 701.00 1.05180e-007 6.0 -0. 072371 9198,0 702.63 1.05043e-007 6.0 -0.072628 91980 703.00 1.05059e-007 6.0 -0 .. 072602 91980 722. 00 1.04303e-007 6.0 -0.071761 91980 723. 00 1.04235e-007 6.0 -0.071762 91980 724. 00 1.04215e-007 6.b -0. 071695 91980 870.00 9.95545e-008 6.0 -0.066523 91980 871.10 9.94959e-008 6.0 -0.069449 91980 872. 00 9.95209e-008 6.0 -0.066342 91980 1172.. 00 9.43124e-008 4.0 -0.059501 91980 1173.22 9.42514e-008 4.0 -0.059413 91980 1174.00 9.42086e-008 4. 0 -0.059300 91980 1273.00 9.30300e-008 4. 0 -0.057482 91980 1274.45 9.29963e-008 4.0 -0.057909 91980 1275.00 9.29914e-008 4.0 -0.057758 91980 1331.00 9.22565e-008 4.0 -0.056821 91980 1332.49 9.22281e-008 4.0 -0~056756 91980 1334.00 9.21700e-008 4.0 -0.056860 91980 1406.00 9.06617e-008 4.0 -0.055483 91980 1407.95 9.06444e-008 4.0 -0.055550 91980 1409.00 9.06661e-008 4.0 -0.055516 91980 1460.80 8.95934e-008 4. 0 -0.054770 91980 TBD-401 Page 89 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots

, Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.4e-007 I

1.2e-007

\

1e-001 ~IT----

I

---?---9+-J,TI I 8e-008 6e-008 4e-008 2e-oos J

0

_)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 90 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D

• Measured - - Calculaled I 1e-006 hn c

1e-007 ~

J I

!/

1e-008

/

I I

I I

1e-009 I/

- ,_ 1-~

1/

1e-010 l

100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 91 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots

!!>\

CAM BERRA Date: Thursday, November 13; 2014 - 17:09:58

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_12.geo Software: ISO CS I

Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3g97 '

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence ::::: 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

"No* Despiptioi:i d;:t 'd;2*.  :!h3. d~4: .d~:>< ' - <I*!? -,, Materlil! *

• _Del}slty. Rel *. ~rte:;

1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 csteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 - 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.o 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 i173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 ls1MPLE aox I

~-----,---- 6.1

©

© .6.2 TBD-401 Page 92 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots eometry Composer Report A

Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:09:58

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\In-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_12.geo Software: rsocs Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 93 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOC$/LabSOCS File: C:\G~NIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOl ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/1.5/14 03:06:41 ' - - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENig2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DET3 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:40:49.

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

STD SOIL DET3. 12 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 13- 14 Detec.tor: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl convergence: 1.00 '

Area [Sq Meters]~ 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.1529e+007 (C)

Leng~h [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by rsbcs (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final i of Voxels 58.00 5. 5803le.-011 10.0 -0. 111629 91980 59.54 l.02215e-010 10.0 '-0. il1660 91980 61.00 1.70179e-010 10.0 -0 .111436 91980 311. 00 i.33446e-007 10;0 -0.068584 91980 311. 98 l.33316e-007 10.0 -0.068138 91980 313.00 l.3328le-007 10.0 -0.068280 91980 343.00 l.31014e-007 8.0 -0.066076 91980 344.27 l.30866e-007 8.0 -0.065913 91980 345.00 1. 30848e-007 8.0 -0.065941 91980 660.00 l.07538e-007 6.0 -0.046390 91980 661.65 i. 07 3.438-007 6.0 -0.046399 91980 663.00 1.07332e-007 6.0 -0.046158 91980 701.00 l.05656e-007 6.0 -0. 044696 91980 702.63 1. 055.l 7e-007 6.0 -0.045024 91980 703.00 l.05533e-007 6.0 -0. 044 98.9 ~1980 722. 00 l.04767e-007 6.0 -0.044410 91980 723. 00 1.0469%-007 6.o -0.044325 919'80 724. 00 l.04678e-007 6.0 -0.044336 91980 870.00 9.99552e-008 6.0 -0.040959 91980 871.10 9. 98961e-ooa 6.0 -0.040925 91980 872. 00 9.99209e-008 6.0 -0.040875 91980 1172.00 9.46366e-008 4. 0 -0. 037.510 91980 1173.22 9.457S3e-008 4.0 -0.037430 91980 1174.00 9.45323e-008 4.0 -0.037356 91980 1273.00 9.33380e-008 4.0 -0.036296 91980 1274.45 9.33041e-008 4.0 -0.036721 91980 1275.00 9 .. 32991e,-008 4. 0 -0.036591 91980 1331.0b 9.25565e-008 4.0 -0.036075 91980 1332. 49 9.25278e-008 4.0 -0.036041 91980 1334.00 9.24694e-008 4.0 -0.036215 91980 1406.00 9.09506e-008 4.0 -0.035384 91980 1407.95 9.09330e-008 4.0 '-o. 035388 91980 1409.00 9. 0954 7e-008 4.0 -0.0:35440 91980 1460.80 8.98753e-008 4.0 -0.035057 91980 TBD-401 Page 94 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.2e-007 1e-007 *~

• ~

~Ali *'

Be-008 111-t-1++4-?~

6e-008 4e-008 2e-008 I

0

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 95 of 107

Attachmeht 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Callbrafion Curve I D Measured - - Calculated j 1e-007 . '

I' I I 1e-008 I

I ' -

I 1e-009 I

I I

v 1e-010 I

1e-011

. 10 1000 10000 100 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 I

I TBD-401 Page 96 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots CAi'\IBERRA Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17:10:55

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 Fiie Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD.c...SOIL_DET4_12.geo Software: ISO CS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL}

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. L\e5Cripl:\on d~l; '* (1;2 ' di3._: *_*cJ:!'I' '*

. diSi ' d~6' Material . *DenSJ.ty. Rel.~ri_c.

1 Box 0.2 230 61 85 c:.steel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 none 3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0~282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 Source-Detector 55.S -57.S 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for effidency cuive generation 58.0 59,5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723~0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 js1MFLE sox I k:

Do--~-

6.2 TBD-401 Page 97 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots A

try Composer Report CAN A Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 17: 10:55

==

Description:==

MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_13_14 File Name: E:\GEOS\ln-Situ\MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version : (default)

TBD-401 Page 98 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF STD SOJ ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:11:11 - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil DET4 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:44:00 - - . -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Ge.om

Description:

STD SOIL DET4 12 Comment: rsocs :.CAL DATE 11 13 14 Detector: 3998 - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 ~

Area [Sq Meters]~ 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.1529e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by !SOCS ~

(U) = Value modified by ~ser

~nergy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 2.36237e-010 10.0 -0. 066905 91980 59.54 3. 91345e-010 10.0 -0.062494 91980 61.00 5.98820e-010 10.0 -0.058443 91980 311. 00 1.45221e-007 10.0 -0.025770 91980 311. 9~ 1.45065e-007 10.0 -0.025710 91980 313.00 1.44895e-007 10.0 -0.025719 91980 343.00 1. 40109e-007 8.0 -0.027005 91980 344.27 1. 39939e.-007 8.0 -0.026636 9198,0 345.00 1.39875e-007 8.0 -0.026768 91980 660.00 i.19375e-007 6.0 -0.028793 91980 661.65 L 1920le-007 6.0 -0.028894 91980 663.00 1.19192e-007 6.0 -0.028781 9198.0 701.00 1.17555e-007 6.0 -0.029015 91980 702.63 1.17483e-007 6.0 -0. 028967 9198.0 703.0b 1.17473e-007 6. 0 -'-0.028869 91980 722. 00 1.1674Qe-007 6.0 -b.028978 91980 723. 00 1.1671.Se-007 6.0 -0.028942 91980 724. 00 1. 16682e-007 6.0 -0.029083 91980 870.00 1.12300e-007 6.0 -0.028853 91980 871.10 1.12265e-007 6.0 -0.028616 91980 872. 00 1.12274e-007 6.0 -0.028820 91980 1172.00 1.07649e-007 4.0 -0.027592 91980 1173.22 1.07629e-007 4.0 -0.027463 91980 1174.00 1.07582e-007 4.0 -0. 027231 91980 1273.00 1. 06283e.-007 4. 0 -0.026774 91980 1274. 45 l.06258e-007 4. 0 -0.026776 91980 1275. 00 1.06243e-007 4. 0 -0.026788 91980 1331. 00 1.05436e-007 4. Q -0,026531 91980 1332.49 1.05467e-007 4.0 -0,026446 91980 1334. 00 1.05427e-007 4.0 -0.026491 91980 1406.00 1.04410e~007 4.0 -0.025708 91980 1407.95 l.04351e-007 4. 0 -0.025660 91980 1409.00 1.04317e-007 4.0 -0.025598 91980 1460.80 1.0358le-007 4. 0 -0.025466 91980 TBD-401 Page 99 of 107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiencx Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.2e-007 I

1ec007

~

~~~

8e-008

~?-+?

Be-008 4e-008 2e-008 J

0

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 I

TBD-401 Page 100 of 107

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Cailbration Curve I D Measured - - Calculat~ I 1e-006 ,--

-- ~

--~

Flrr 1e-007

'LO..'\'

I

/

I 1e-008 I

I I

/

I

'I j

/

1e-009 I

J 1e-01 O 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 101 of 107

_ _ ___,:-'-P-'-'ri'-"m=ary Efficien_fy taken from ECC files, for set energies~"-:-------------~---------------------!

~lweig'-'-'ht,_____.1_-----=5=8.=o_.i_-----=5~9.=5,!_-----=6-'-'1.=o: ____,3:...:.11""".=-oi._ _----=3'""12=.o=l------=3"-13=*=-o*'------=3'-'-43=*0"'".l_ _----=344~*3=!-----=345'--='*=ol'--------=6=6=0.=ol 661.7 1 1.000 4.15e-011 7.78e-011 1.32e-010 1.33e-007 1.33e-007 1.33e-007 1.31e-007 1.31e-007 1.31e-007 1.07e-007 1.07e-007 2 1.000 3.68e-011 6.95e-011 1.19e-010 1.32e"007 1.32e-007 1.32e-007 1.30e-007 1.30e-007 1.30e-007 1.07e-007 1.07e-007 3 1.000 5.58e-011 1.02e-0.10 1.70e-010 1.33e-007 1.33e-007 1.33e-007 1.31e-007 1.31e-007 1.31e-007 1.08e-007 1.07e"007 4 1.000 2.36e-010 3,91e-010 5.99e-010 1.45e-007 1.45e-007 1.45e-007 1.40e-007 1.40e-007 1.40e"007 1.19e-007 1.19e-007 Sum 3.70e-010 6.41e-010 1.02e-009 5.44e-007 5.44e-007 5.43e-007 5;32e-007 5.31e-007 5.31e-007 4.41e-007 4.41e-007 Error,% 1.00e+001 1.00e+o01 1.00e+o01 1;OOe+001 1.00e+o01 1.00e+o01 8.00e+OOO 8.00~+000 8.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path MHF_STD_SOIL_DET1 ..J2 Thu_Nov_13_02:55:25_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 MHF_STD_SOIL_DET2_12 Thu_Nov_13_03:00:51_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

3 MHF_STD_SOIL_DET3_12 Thu_Nov_13_03:05:42_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs \data\GEOMETRY\ln-SitU\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 MHF_STD_SOIL_DET4_12 Thu_Nov_13_03:10:12_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPU;_BOX\

Information for saved.file with multiefficiency data:

File Name File Stamp Path

Description:

MHF_STD_SoiL.SUM_D12 Comment: Cal Date 11/13/14 A

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report Cii 0

0

(/)

s::

c:

a:

0 c:

-u

< )>

(J)

Dl m~

cc (J) ~~

-* :::r (J) 3

J (J)

.Q :J

-u::.

OD en w MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:24:04 1

Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

663.0! 701.0 1 702.6! 703.0! 722.0 1 723.ol 724.ol 870.0i 871.1 i 872.ol 1172.0! 1173.2 1.07e-007 1.06e-007 1.05e-007 *1.05e-007 1.05e-007 1.05e-007 1.05e-007 9.99e-.008 9.99e-008 9.99e-008 9.46e-008 9.45e-008 1.07e-007 1.05e-007 1.0Se-007 1.05e-007 1.04e-007 1.04e-007 1.04e-007 9.96e-008 9.95e".008 9.95e-008 9.43e-008 9.43e-008 1.07e-007 1.06e-007 1.06e-007 1.06e-007 1.05e-007 1.05!!-007 1.05e"007 1.00e-007 9.99e-008 9.99e-008 9.46e-008 9.46e-008 1.19e-007 1.18e-00.7 1.17e-007 1.17e-007 1.17e-007 1.17e-007 1.17e-007 1.12e-007 1.12e-007 1.12e-007 1.08e-007 1.08e-007 4.4.1e-007 4.34e-007 4.34e-007 4.34e-007 4.31e-007 4.30e-007 4.30e-007 4.12e-007 4.12e-007 4.12e-007* 3.91e-007 3.91e-007 6:00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e-1{)00 6.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_STD_Soil_SUM_D12 Cal Date 11 /13/14 lA

~AN BERRA Multi-Efficiency Report

-u Dl cc ro MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 II Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:24:04 2

Prir:!)!!_I)' Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

1174.0[ 1273.0! 1274.41 121s.ol 1331.0! 1332.sl 1334_0! 1406.ol 1407.91 1409.0i 1460.8 9.45e-008 9.33e-008 9.33e-008 9.33e-008 9.25e-008 9.25e-008 9.24e-008 9.09e-008 9.09e-008 9.09e-008 8.98e-008 9.42e-008 9.30e-008 9.30e-008 ' 9.30e-008 9.23e-008 9.22e-008 9.22e-008 9.07e-008 9.06e-008 9.07e-008 -8.96e-008 9.45e-008 9.33e-008 9.33e-008 9.33e-008 9.26e-008 9.25e"008 9.25e-008 9.10e-008 9.09e-008 9.10e-008 8.99e-008 1.08e-007 1.06e-007 1.06e-007 1.06e-007 1.0Se-007 1.ose,007 1.0Se-007 1.04e-007 1.04e-007 1.04e,007 1.04e-007 3.91e-007 3.86e-007 3.86e-007 3.86e-007 3.83e-007 3.83e-007 3.83e-007 3.77e-007 3.77e-007 3.77e-Q07 3:73e-007 4.00e-+-000 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+DOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+oOO 4.00e+OOO Information for inpu_t ECC* files C:\G ENIE2K\isocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\G EN IE2K\isocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ)SIMPLE_BOX)

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_STD_Soil_SUM_D12 Cal Date 11/13/14 Multi.:.Efficienc (ii 0

0 CIJ s:

~ -

bc:

-u

< )>

(I)

Dl cc m::i:

(I) gi ~

-* :::r (I) 3

s (I)

~ 3.

-u ~

oo rn.w MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Thursday, November 13, 2014, 03:24:04 3

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS I$0CS/LaJ::>SOCS File:. C: \GENIE2K\isocs \data \GEOMETRY\In-Si tu \Mul tiefficiency\MHF S'l ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/13/14 03:24:17 . -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF STD Soil SUM D12.CAL G~nie Cal Time: 11/13/14 04:47:11 - - - -

Template: (SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom Descriptlon: STD Soil SUM 012 - - -

Comment: ISOCS: C.al Date li/13/14 .

Detector: (3994)+(3996)+(3997)+(3998)+

Collimator: (GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+

Convergence: 1.00 % - * - -

Area [Sq Meters]: 1.0000e-004 (C)

Mass [Grams]~ 1.0000e+OOO (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = V~lue calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty *%Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 3;70385e-010 10.0 0.0000000 64000 59.54 6.40906e-010 10.0 b.0000000 64000 6:)..00 1.01996e-009 10.0 0.0000000 64000 311. 00 5.44239e-007 10.0 0.0000000 64000 311. 98 5.43701e-007 10.0 0.0000000 64000 313,00 5 .. 43431e-Oo7 10.0 0.0000000 64000 343.00 5.32oo5e-oo7 8.0 0.0000000 64000 344.27 5.31396e-007 8.0 0.0000000 64.000 345.00 5.31283e-007 8.0 O.OOOOQOO 64000 660.00 4.4144le-007 6.0 0.0060000 64000 661.65 4.40685e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 663.00 4.40644e-Ob7 6.0 0.0000000 640QO 701. 00 4. 34o0.4e-oo7 6.0 0.0000000 64000 702.63 4 .. 33518e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 703.00 4.33556e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 722. 00 4.30536e'-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 723. 00 4.30310e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 724.0Q 4.30212e-007 (5. 0 0.0000000 64000 870.00 4. 11732e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 871. 10 4. 1152oe...:001 6.0 0.0000000 64000 8.7.2.00 4.11604e-007 6.0 O.OOOObOO 64000 1172.00 3.91209e-007 4. 0 0.0000000 64000 1173.22 3.91005e-007 4.0 0. 000000.0 64000 1174.00 3.90830e'-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1273.00 3.85963e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1274.45 3.85837e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1275.00 3.85807e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1331. 00 3.82779e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1332.49 3. 82725e-007 4. 0 0.0000000 64000 1334.00 3.82510e~007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1406.0Q 3.76946e-007 4' 0 0.0000000 64000 1407.95 3.76834e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1409.00 3.76865e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1460.80 3. 72897e-007. 4. 0 0.0000000 64000 TBD-401 Page 105 of 107

-- __J

Attachment 10.3 ISOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculated I 6e-007 5e-007 NN_

4e-001 1.

t=?=?=J.TI I

~e-007 2e-007 1e-007 I

0 --

) r~

0 500 100.0 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 106of107

Attachment 10.3

!SOCS Multi-Curve Efficiency Plots interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006

'" ~*

I " . '

I 1e-007 I

I I ~~

I I

1e-008 I ,_~

I I

I 1e-009 I .,.

-~ ~-

1e-010 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET01 TBD-401 Page 107of107

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System Revision O Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results TBD-401 Page 1 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results GARDIAN SYSTEM Calibratio1lll Records MHF :n:P~ 1 Intermodal with Liner Summation TBD-401 Page 2of101

MHF Intermodal Liner 11 18 14 11/18/2014 3:10:25 AM SCltJ~TEf~?DAL with LINER; DETO 1; P_osition 1 2.646 3.527 4.409

• 1Q - . - - . , , . . . , . . - - - - - - . . , . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .

10-6 10-7

?f2. 10'"8

>i

()

c L:..~ yr:~ - --

.Cl.> 1 Q.-9 - ---~

()

~

UJ10-10 1Q-11 1 0-12-.:-""'----'-------"-----'----'---4-------'------'--~-~~~~......___,.1_ _~

I 102 103 Energy (keV)

MHFintermodalLinerll 1.8 1411/18/2014 3:11:31AM ScrtJ~TE~?DAL with LINER; DET02; Position I 2.646 3.527 4.409 1Q-6 I

1Q-7 - 'I I

I I

I

~

-I CD 0

.J:,..

0

R 0 10"'8

~

>. r:; [:J

(.)

c I I

Q) 1 Q-9 I I

I

-- D

'(.) I

~

LU1 Q-10 1 Q-11 1 Q-12 i=:..<:-__!..._I --J....-L---l-~-----'-----'------'---'---'---'-----'---"---+-1-------'

I 102 103 Energy (keV)

MHF Intermodal Liner 11 18 14 11/18/2014 3:12:32 AM S'~TEf~PDAL with LINER; DET03; Position I 2.646 3.527 4.409 1 Q-6 1 Q I I

-I OJ 0 I I

.J,..

0

~

'cf2. 1 Q-8

(.)

c 2"1:6 f rI!

---*]

.ID

(..)

1 Q-9 I tt::

w 1Q-10 I I

I 1 Q-11

-u Dl cc (1) 01 0

• ~

~

102 103 Energy (keV)

MHF Intermodal Liner 11 18 14 11/18/2014 3:14:47 AM S'~TE~?DAL with LINER; DET04; Position 1 2.646 3.527 4.409 10-6 10-7

~

0

~* 1 o~a 9E1 -

i '

Q *-*-** -- - *-~-*--

~ -

c -- ' r: o- c _

(].)

(.)

~ 1Q-9 10-10

-a D>

<C Cl) 1 Q-11 I I

- I --

Cl) 0

~ 102 103 Energy (keV}

MHF Intermodal Liner 11 18 14 11/18/2014 3:15:50 AM SOIL; m INL+/-JM91EJ~ with LINER; Sum of all segment spectra;

' 2.646 3.527 4.409 1 Q-5 10"'6 I

I I

-i OJ 1Q-7 0~

0 j.. IE ~:

0 f

~

(.)

as 1a-a I I

I I

(.) I I

tt= i I

I Lll 1Q-9 -

1 Q-10 iJ Ill cc Cl> - I I I I I I

--J

s. I

~

0

~ 102 103 Energy (keV)

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results CGAmDJIAN SYSTEM C siilftlb)]r~ ti((J) nn Rtec<<J> irdl§ MHF IP-1 lfntermodal with lLinen*

Attached-o MI-IF Intermochll Wnll Thickness, nq Specs.

o G1mllnn Tmilcr Wall Thiclmess o Iutel'J11oclai Positioning o Dct. 1-4 Density 1.2 models, indMchml efficiency cnls, Summation Cnl.

o Det. J-4Density1.6 models, individual efficiency cals, Summation Cnl.

o Det. 1-4 Density 2.0 nu;ulels, iuclivichml efficiency cals, S11111mntion Cal.

o De.t l-4 Sum (:m'.\'cs for Density 1.2, 1.6, & 2.0.

o Sum of all Segment Spech*a Pcl'formed by (l_/d!/Au#Ad Date ---t.l_,_!-~l-!.'1_--'-1'f-1--

Re\'iewed by -~Clf.>1.-'iq.,j'.ci;'/l<.Ll().L_. r~" "-'-"'-~-=-

=-=-=v.:.-r-_**

.;___ _ Dntc._ _ f_l~_l_ZJ_-f_l_f_~

rPJ?

TBD-401 Page 8of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results MHF Intermoda l with Liner Wall Thickness (Homogenized) 61 "

Wall Steel = 10 gauge= 0.1345" 230" x 60" = 13,800 in 2 at 0.1345" thick

+ 3 Vertical Rails 60" x 15" = 2700 in 2

+ 2 Horizontal supp011 beam 480" = 960 in 2

+ Chain guard 2"x2"x22" = 176 in 2

+ - 100 lbs hardware 2,617 in 2

• (if IOOlbs x 453.6g/lb /7.86g/cc = 5771 cc = 352in 3/0. l 345"=2617 in2)

Total Area = 13800+2700+960+ l 76+2617 = 20253 in 2 Effective Thickness = 20253/13800 x 0.1345" thickness = 0.20" Steel

+ I Steel Liner Plate 230" x 48" = 11040 in 2 I 13800 in 2 x 0.1875" Thick = 0.15" Steel Tota l Effective Th ickness = 0.35" Steel TBD-401 Page 9of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results C&RP B-20 Appendix 8.1 Rev. 0 Page I of I Energy Solutions Main Trailer Wall Steel Channel flattened = 7" Detector is positioned 14" behind the outside wall of the Main Trailer. Utilizing a 90 degree collimator will give a 28" diameter Field of View. Worst case positioning will place the detector between two of the channels, thus including both in the field of view. The channels also contain 0.5 by 2 3/8" rectangular holes which will not subtracted from the steel area thus being more conservative.

Material area 2

Total area of the field of view: A= rrr 2 = rr14 2 = 615.75 in

• 2 Area of flattened steel channel : {7" x 18.8") + (1/2 7" x 3.525" x 2ends) x 2channels =312 .55 in

• 2 2 2 Area of PVC: 615.75 in - 312.55 in = 303.20 in

• 2 Area of trailer ski n: 615 .75 in

• Effective Thickn ess PVC = 1/16" thick x {303 .2/615.75) = 0.031" Steel= 1/16" thick x (31 2.55/615.75) = 0.032" Al Skin= 1/16" thick x 615.75/6 15.75) = 0.063" Homogenized Wall Density Total Effective w all thickness = 0.031 + 0.032 + 0.063 = 0.126" Density= 0.031/0.126* 1.4g/cc PVC + 0.032/0.126 *7.86g/cc steel+ 0.063/0.126* 2.7g/cc Al= 3.69 g/cc.

Material percent age = 0.344/3.69 = 9% PVC, 2.00/3.69=54% Steel, 1.35/3.69= 37% Al.

For Modeling purposes, the Main Trailer Wall (MTWall) (Absorber 1) =0.126" thick at 3.69 g/cc comprised of 9% PVC, 54% Steel and 37% Al.

TBD-401 Page 10of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results C&RP B-20 Appendix 8.2 Rev. 0 Page I of I Energy Solutions Support Tra il er Wa ll Stee l Channel fl attened = 3 5/8" Detector is positioned 14" behind the outside wall of the Support Trailer. Utilizing a 90 degree collim ator will give a 28" diameter Field of View. Worst case positioning will place the detector between two of the chann els, thus including both in the field of view. The channels also contain 0.5 by 2 3/8" rectangular holes which will not subtracted from the steel area thus being more con servative.

Material area 2

Total area of the field of view : A = rrr 2 = rr14 2 = 615.75 in

• 2 Area of flatten ed steel channel : (3.625" x 11.28") +( 1/2 3.625" x 2.775" x 2ends) x 2channels = 102 ln

• 2 2 Area of wood : 615.75 in -102 in = 513 .75 in' .

2 Area of trailer skin : 615.75 in

• Effective Thickness Wood = 1/4" thick x (513 .75/615.75) = 0.209" Steel= 1/16" thick x (10 2/615 .75) = 0.010" Al Skin= 1/16" thick x 615.75/615.75) = 0.063" Homogenized Wall Density Total Effective wall thickness= 0.209 + 0.010 + 0.063 = 0.282" Density= 0.209/0.282

• 0.75g/cc wood+ 0.010/0.282*7.86g/cc ste el+ 0.063/0.282*2.7g/cc Al = 1.44g/cc.

Material percentage= 0.556/1.44 = 39% wood, 0.279/1.44=19% Steel, 0.603/1.44= 42% Al.

For Modeling purposes, the Support Trailer Wall {STWa ll) {Absorber 1) = 0.282" thick at 1.44g/ cc comprised of 39% wood, 19% Stee l and 42% Al.

TBD-401 Page 11 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results lntermodal IP-1 8t IP-2 168" 41.5"

~

With Det +/- 57.~" I I 230"

~

°115" SS;S"standoff = FOVN 111" I fE-- 84" I

~~

. 14" L I 85"

/

TBD-401 Page12of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results HBPP IM Containers Ty11e A/IPZ lntermodals Type IPl lntermodals Type IPl lntermodals (Gray) Type IPl lntermocials (Gray) (Purple, Non, lined) (Purple; lined)

Tare Weight= 9450 lbs Tare Weight

• 8000 lbs Tare Weight = 8150 lbs Tare Weight= 10680 lbs

- I 1PGEU100:1. *1 MHFU-*120*1 :I. l'GEU :l.000 :t PGEU 101JIJ 2 SDCU 1002 2 MHFU-1'151 2 PGEU 1003 2 PGEU :L047 3 MHFU-1554 3 l'GElJ :l030 3 PGEU :l033 3 SDCU 1004

'1 MHFlHliGli tJ PGEU 1040 IJ PGELJ :l034 4 SDCU :LOOS G MHFU-1641 G MHrU-1712

=> PGEU 1052 !j PGf:U 1035 5 SDCU 1006 6 PGEU :toss Ci PGEU 103G 6 PGEU -:J.007 7 .MJ:IFW17'16 :*

7 PGEU :LOSG  ! 7 PGEU 1037 8 MHFLJ-*1757 7 PGEU 1008 9 MHFU-'1870 8 PGl:LJ 10G1 8 l'GEU 1038 8 PGEU 1009 10 Ml-IFU-'lt19li I 9 PGEU 1081 9 PGEU :L039 9SDCU1010 'l'I Ml*lf=U>l 905 :w PGEU 1109 10 J>Gl:U :t04:1.

• 12 MHFU-*l 9'13 11 PGEU 1132 1:1. PGl:U 1042 10 PGEU 1011

• 13 MHFU-*1938 12 PGEU :l142 12 PGEU 1043

1.1 PGEU 1012 14 MHFU-2005 :L3 PGEU :L045 12socu1013 :1.3 PGEU.1158

• 15 Ml-iFU-203G :l.IJ PGl:U 1046

'IG MHFU-20'14 14 rm:u :t169 1.3 PGEU 101.4 15 PGEU :lOtJB

• 17 MHFU-2071 15 PGEU 1:1.93

t4 PGEU 1015 16. P~EU 101]9

• ia Ml-IFIJ-2093) 16 PGEU :L20:1.

1.s PGEU 1o:iG :l7 P<-iEU 1050

• 19 Ml-IFU-2114' 1B l~GEU 105:1.

16SDCU1017 20 MHFU-2129 19 l'CiEU 1059

1.7 $DCU :LO:L8 2*1 MHFU,2162 20 PG EU :L063

L8 PGEU 1019 22 MHFU-2180 21 PGl:U :L06Ci 23 MHFU-2206 19 SDCU 1020 22 l'GEU 1079 24 MHFU-2207i 20 PGEU 1021 25 MHFU-22fo' 23 l'GEU :l087 21PGEU1022 2G MHFU-2212 24 PGEIJ :L094 22SDCU1023 27 MHFU-22'1G 2!.i PGEU :l098 28 MHFU-227'1 26 PGJ:U :l:LO'l 23SDCU1024 29 Ml-IFU-2297 27 J>Gf:lJ :L:lO(i 24 PGEU :l.025 30 MHFU-2310 28 l'GEiJ :l:l07 25 l'GEU :l.02G 3'1 MHFU-2337 29 PG 1;u :trnn 26 SDCU 1027 32 Ml-IFU-2300 30PGEU1110 33 MHFU-2383 3:1. PGEU :t:l:t2 27 PGEU :1.028 3'1 MHFU-2413 32 l'Gf:LJ :l:l13 28 SDCU 1029 35 MHFU-2417 33 PGELJ :tl:t8 29SDCU1031 3G Ml-IFU-2422 31 l'Gl!lJ 1:l19 30SDCU1032 3!.i PGEU :L121 ft;-! lntHrr.~Jt1 1h1~~d In liih\ bl~~- a re del°gl).)tt;:i tot ~P.Y ~tTr:"1"-1:nU o'.!r.tfhn~ an 3G PGEU :l:l.36 ad~i~~~1.2! of Ste~lc:!nlh! ~:~r .a~ 3 t<1~!! 37 l'GEU :1.:t43

~'./e!i:htof'"'IS!~_lb1 38 l'GElJ :1.3.!i:L

l!J l'GELJ :i.:1.72 IJO l'GEU 11'/!i Tb llr:!dlniermodits ht\°t' an 1iH1tion113/16" st.!ft Ciof stu:I tn~*& th-!

lrd'!trwaU19f tt,c con1~1nu. 1r~

st:.!eliroicCl';en tt-.~ IJ.cor. l{flh erA'1ar.d s"du .!r,d etteni1 .;s:" up rrom th: l!->1~.

, TBD-401 Page 13of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 14of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 15of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 16 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results This pag~ contains confidential commercial i_nformation and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 17 of 101 J

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 18of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results This page contains qonfidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 19of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results This page contains confidential commercial information and has been redacted.

TBD-401 Page 20of101 J

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results GARDIAN SYSTEM Calibration Records MHF IP-1 ][ntermodal with Liner Density 2.0 TBD-401 Page 21 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 ~ 15:43:14

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18'"._14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner:.._SOIL_DET1_20.geo Software: isocs Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimate1r: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F1 Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

D.lmenslons (inches)

. d;2 .. - d;4** .- d;6*

No. Descriplji;m _.. d:1 d.3'" d,5, .. Mateiijll *' .Denslt.V; Rel.'. Cone.

1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.02756 germanum 5.4 6 source-Detector 55.5 57.5 (j -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1i72.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 Jsn.tFLE sox J De----

6.3

.~ ~

TBD-401 Page 22 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Geometry Compos r Report A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:43:14

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 23 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMgTRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHt Liner ~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:05:41 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DETl 20.CAL Gertie Cal Time: li/18/1~ 02:41:QO - - - - ..

Template: SIMPLE.BOX Geom

Description:

HMF Liner Dl 20 .

Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 18 14 Detector: ~994 - - -

Collimator: GARIHAN Gl Convergence: 1.00' Area [Sq Meters] : 8. 3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 3.5881e+007 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used

{C) = Value calculated by ISOCS

{U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final j~ of Voxels 58.00 5. 07 355e-013 10.0 -0 .118527 8.17 60 59.54 1. 2284 9e-012 10.0 -0 .112697 81760

61. 00 2.60106e-012 10.0 -0.107622 81760 311. 00 5.70837e-008 10.0 -0.030549 81760 311. 98 5.70579e-008 10.6 -0.030180 .81760 313.00 5.70803e-008 10.0 -0.030422 81760 343.00 5. 70316e-008 8.0 -0.031052 81760 344.27 5.70019e-008 8.0 -0.030868 81760 345.00 5.70183e,-008 8.0 -0. 031117 81760 660.QO 5.i3165e-008 6.0 -Q.033302 81760 661.65 5.12385e-008 6.0 -0.033479 81760 663.00 5.12407e-008 6.0 -0.033135 81760 701.00 5.07914e-008 6.0 -0.033172 81760 702 .. 63 5.07306e-008 6.0 ~0.033386 81760 703.00 5.07452e-0Cl8 6.0 -0.033377 81760 722. 00 5.05368e-008 6.0 -0.033410 81760 723.00 5.05129e-008 6.0 -0.033298 Bi 760 724.00 5.05115e-008 6.0 -0.033372 81760 870.00 4.9279le-008 6.0 -0.032413 81760 871.10 4.92528e-008 6.0 -0. 032391. 81760 872. 00 4.92768e-008 6.0 -0.032272 Bl760 1172.00 4.82107e-008 4.0 -0.029503 81760 1173.22 4.81875e-008 4.0 -0.029425 81760.

1174.00 4.81703e-008 4.0 -0.029266 81760 1273.00 4.79540e-008 4.0 -0.028286 81760 1274.45 4.79408e-008 4.0 -0.028483 81760 1275.00 4.79390e-008 4.0 -0.028212 81760 133J.OO 4.77585e-008 4.0 -0.Q27758 81760 1332.49 4.77495e-Q08 4.0 -0.027658 81760 1334.00 4.773lle-008 4.0 -0.027999 81760 1406.00 4.71881e-008 4.0 -0.026588 81760 1407.95 4.71900e~008 4.0 -0.026713 81760 1409,00 4. 72039e~008 4.0 -b.026645 81760 1460.80 4.67976e-008 4.0 -0.026163 81760 TBD-401 Page 24of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculated I 6e-008 1)1~

5e-008 ~ff I

?+-~t l

T r 4e-008 3e-008 2e-008 --

1e-008 '

\ 0 .!..

) ,

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 25 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured -*- - Calcul.ated I 1e-007 I

1e-008 I

I 1e-009 I

I 1e-010 I

I/

1e-011 I

J

~ .

1e-012 1e-013 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 26 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:44:15

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner:_SOIL_DET2_20 Comment: Calib 11/18/14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_20.geo Software: ISOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. .Descriptlo11*: d;1: 'd.~ *d;3, . ~ d;4. 'd$: .. . *d.6 ~. l°'.'litterla!' ',' : Dei1sicy, Relrconc.

1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source.- Top Layer 0 <hone>

3. Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency cunre generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407:9 1409.0 1460.8 js1MPLE eox j Do--~~

i-------0---~l 0

TBD-401 Page 27 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Geom try Composer Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:44:15

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_20 Comment: Calib 11/18/14 Fi le Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 28 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\G~NIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SI~PLE BOX\MHF Liner~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:13:49 - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Sdil DET2 20.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:48:22 - - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom Oescription: MHF Liner 02 20 Comment: ISOCS:CALIB 11/18/14 Detector: 3996 -

Collimat:dr: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1. 00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 3.5881e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calqul~ted by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertatnty %Convergence Final Jt of Voxels 58.00 4.50229e-013 10.0 -0 .113920 81760 59!54 1.09907e~o12 10.0 -0 .107239 81760

61. 00 2.34344e-;-012 10. 0 -0.101340 81760 311. 00 5.67251e-008 10.0 -ci.004884 si 160 311. 98 5.67002e-008 10.0 -0.004519 81760 313. 00 5.67233e-008 10.0 -0.004837 81760 343.00 5.66950e-008 8.0 -0.006179 81760 344.27 5. 66662e-0'08 8.0 -0.006220 81760 345.00 5.66830e-008 8.0 -0.006548 81760 660.00 5.11028e-008 6.0 -0.016226 81760 661.65 5.10254e-008 6.0 -0.016373 81760 663.00 5.10278e-008 6.0 -0.016077 81760 701. 00 5.05863e-008 6.0 -0.016620 81760 702.63 5.05259e-008 6.0 -0.016855 81760 703.00 5.05405e-008 6.0 -0.016791 8) 760 722. 00 5.03357e-008 6.0 -0.017079 81760 723.00 5.03120e-008 6.0 -0.017052 81760 724. 00 5.03107e-008 6.0 -0.017141 81760 870.00 4.91007e-008 6.0 -0. 017868. 81760 871.10 4. 9074.6e-008 6.0 -0.017803 81760 )

872.00 4.90986e-008 6.0 -0.017663 817 60 1172.00 4.80615e-008 4.0 -0.017553 81760 1173.22 4.80385e-008 4. 0 -0.017450 81760 1174.00 4.80214e-008 4. 0 -0 ..017229 81760 1273.00 4. 78119e-008 4.0 -0. 016637 81760 i274.45 4.77989e-008 4.0 -0.016905 81760 1275.00 4.77971e-008 4.0 -0.016586 81760 1331. oo 4.76203e-008 4.0 -0.016301 81760 1332.49 4.76113e-008 4.0 -0.016231 81760 1334.00 4.75931e-008 4.0 -0.016564 81760 1406.00 4.70553e-008 4. 0 -0.015423 81760 1407.95 4.70573e-008 4. 0 --'0.015561 81760 1409.00 4.70712e-008 4.0 -0 .. 015551 81760 1460.80 4.66684e-008 4.0 -0.015254 .81760 TBD-401 Page 29 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - -

• Calculated I l*ll~

~ill I 5e-008 111 I 1

-?f-6Tt l 4e-008 3e-008 2e-008 1e-008 0 --

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 30 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve j D Measured - - Calculated j 1e-007

"" . 1- -i!

I I

1e-008 I

I 1e-009 I

I I

1e-010 I

~!--

I 1e-011

~

I 1e-012 1e-013 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page31 of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results j)\

CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:45:15

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_20 Comment: CAL OATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mrn Hg, Relative Humidity =70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

• Descrip_tio11 d;i .d.-2" .- d~3

-- -d.5. -* _Materl!JI'.' * .Density _Rel::eoni:.

-"dA. ,d;6, .

~

No.

1 Box 0.35 230 61. 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer o. <none;>

3 Source. - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency cuive generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 lsn.!FLE sox I 6.2 TBD-401 Page 32 of 1OL

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

CA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:45:15

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 33of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE 80~\MHF Liner~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:19:31 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET3 20.CAL Genie Cal Time: il/18/14 02:54:17 - - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geo~

Description:

MHF Liner D3 20 Comment: ISOCS:CAL D~TE_11_18_14 Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 8. 3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 3.5881e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 6. 78963e-013 10.0 -0 .116644 81760 59.54 l.60782e-012 10.0 -0 .110901 81760 61.00 3.33974e.,...012 10. 0 -0.105918 8176Q 311. 00 5.71854e-008 10,0 -0.030549 81760 311. 98 5.71588e-008 10.0 -0.030180. 81760 313.00 5.71804e-008 10.0 -0.030422 817 6.0 343.00 5. 71113e-008 8.0 -.0.031052 81760 344.27 5.70808e-008 8'. 0 -0.030868 81760 345.00 5.70969e-008 8:0 -c-0. 031117 8i760 660.00 5.133B7e-008 6.0 -0.033302 81760 661.65 5.12605e-008 6.0 -0.033479 81760 663.00 5.12628e-008 6.0 -0.033135 81760 701. 00 5.08120e-008 6.0 -0.033172 81760 702.63 5. 07511e-008 6.0 -0.033385 81760 703.00 5.07656e-008 6.0 -0.033377 81760 722. 00 5.05566e-008 6,0 -0.033409 81760 723. 00 5.05327e-008 6.0 -0. 033297 . 81760 724. 00 5.05312e-008 6.0 -0.033371 81760 870.00 4.92952e-008 6.0 -0.032412 .81760 871.10 4.92689e-008 6.0 -0.032391 81760 872. 00 4.92929e-008 6.0 -0.032271 81760 1172.00 4.82237e-008 4. 0 -0.029502 81760 1173.22 4.82005e~008 4.0 -0.029424 181760 1174.00 4.81833e-008 4.0 -0.029266 81760 1273.00 4.7967le-008 4.0 -0.028286 81760 1274.45 4.79539e-008 4.0 -0.028482 81760 1275.0b 4.7952le-008 4.0 -0.028212 81760 1331.00 4. 77719e-008 4.0 -0.027758 81760 1332.49 4. 7762,9e-008 4.0 -0.027658 81760 1334.00 4.77445e-008 4.0 -0.027999 8.1760 1406.00 4.72020e-008 4.0 -0.026587 81760 1407.95 4.72040e-008 4.0 -0.026712 81760 1409.00 4. 72179e-008 4. 0 -0.026644 81760 1460.80 4.68121e-008 4.0 -0.026162 81760 TBD-401 Page 34of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated EHiciency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculated I 6e-008 1µ1,~

5e-008 I ~JJJ. I IT! I i I

11 l

'J'-Y:" l I T

4e-008 3e-008 29-008 19-008 0 -

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV) oatasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 35of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efflclel)cy Callf:!ratlon Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-007

• ~ --c --

I 1e-OOB I

I 1e-009 I

I I

1e-010 I

I I

1e-011

[

1e-012 1e-013

. 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 36 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

CANl3ERl~A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:46:11

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_20.geo Software: rsocs Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: = =

Temperature 65 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. Descriptlo,i .. d.1* 'd;2' d;3 ':d;4 .:* . ,d;S:, - -.d.G. l\'liltetlal:,  :!)e11slt:V; Rel,; C!l(ti:.

1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top layer 0 none 3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 ls11.1PLE BOX I Do--~-

\

TBD-401 Page 37 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Geometry Composer Report:

Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:46:11

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_20 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_20.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 38 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF Liner S ISOCS/LabSOCS. Time: 11/18/14 02~25:34 -

Genie Cal File: C: \GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET4 20. CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:57:39 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

MHF Liner D4 20 Comment: rsocs:cAL DATE_11_18_14 Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN. Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 3. 5881e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncerta.inty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 2.816ble-012 10.0 -0.023530 81760 59.54 6.03942e-012 10.0 -0.018229 81760

61. 00 1.15387e-Oll 10.0 -0.013421 81760 311. 00 6.21344e-008 10.0 0.013212 81760 311.98 6.20973e-008 10.0 0.013226 81760 313. 00 6.20642e-008 10.0 0.013210 81760 343.00 6.09865e-008 8.0 0,009237 81760 344.27 6.09483e-008 8.0 0;009533 81760 345.00 6.09493e-008 8. 0 0.009222 81760 660.00 5. 69372e-008 6.0 -0.009404 81760 661.65 5. 68717e-008 6.0 -0.009517 81760 663.00 5. 68834e-008' 6.0 -0 .. 009409 81760 701.00 - 5.64863e-008 6.0 -0.010667 81760 702.63 5. 64 625e-008. 6.0 -0.010648 81760 703.00 5.64606e-008 6.0 -0.010658 81760 722. 00 5.62901e-008 6.0 -0. 011118 81760 723. 00 5.62907e-008 6.0 -0. 011111 81760 724.00 s.62813e~oo8 6.0 -0.011278 81760 870,00 5.53379e-008 6.0 -0.013359 81760 871.10 5.53289e-008 6.0 -0.013109 81760 872. 00 5.53425e-Q08 6.0 -0. 013353 81760 1172. 00 5.48156e-008 4. 0 -0. 013.869 81760 1173.22 5.48208e-008 4.0 -0.013776 81760 1174.00 5.47985e-'008 4.0 -0. 013572 8176.0 1273.00 5.46021e-008 4 .. o -0.013477 81760 1274.45 5.45974e-008 4.0 -0. 013i95 81760 1275.00 5.. 45917e-008 4.0 -0.013232 81760 1331. 00 5.44040e-008 4.0 -0.013070 81760 1332. 49 5. 4.4358e-008 4.0 -0.012956 81760 1334. 00 5.44270e-008 4.0 -0.012937 81760 1406.00 5.41744e-008 4. 0 -0. 012096 81760 1407.95 5.41522e-008 4.0 -0.012092 81760 1409.00 5.41387e-008 4.0 -0. 011995 81760 1460.80 5.39531e-008 4.0 -0 .. 011874 81760 I

I TBD-401 Page 39of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Cilllbratlcin Curve I l!l Measured - - Calculated I 7e-008 6e-Q08 h

--tt}- l T +-++*r 5e-008 4e-008 3e-008 2e-008 1e-608 I

0

_)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DETQ2

.TBD-401 Page 40 of 101

0 Attachment 10.4 I MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Callbr~tion Curve I o M~asured - - Calculated I 1e-007 p0 ,u . '

I I

I *-- --

1e-008 I

I I

-~-

1e-009 I

I I

I I/

I

~-

I J

1e-011 1e-012 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasourte: DET02 TBD-401 Page 41 of 101

I Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies~:

~iWeight I 58.ol 59.5i 61.0: 311.oi 312.0i 313.ol 343.ol 344.31 345.o! 660.ol 661.7 1.000 5.07e-013 1.23e-012 2.60e-012 5.71e-008 5.71e~oo8 5.71e-008 5.70e-008 5.70e-008 5.70e-008 5.:13e-008 5.12e-008 2 1.000 4.SOe-013 1.10e-012 2.34e-012 5.67e-008 5.67e-008 5.67e-008 5.67e-008 s:67e-bo8 5.67e-008 5.11e-008 5.10e-008 3 1.000 6.79e-013 1.61e-012 3.34e-012 5.72e-008 5.72e-008 5.72e-008 5.71e-008 5.71e-008 5.71e-008 5.13e-008 5.13e-008 4 1.000 2.82e-012 6.04e-012 1.15e-011 6.21e-008 6.21e-008 6.21e-OOB 6.10e-008 6.09e-008 6.09e-008 5.69e-008 5.69e-008 Sum 4.45e-012 9.97e-012 1.98e-011 2.33e-007 2.33e-007 2.33e-007 2.32e-007 2.32e-007 2.32e-001 2.11e-007 2.10e-007 Error,% 1.00ei-001 1.00ei-001 1.00ei-001 1.00ei-001 1.0Qei-001 1.00ei-001 8.00ei-000 8.00ei-000 8.00ei-000 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_2C Tue_Nov_ 18_02: 04:49_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln~Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_2C Tue_Nov_ 18_02: 12:56_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isoc;:s\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

3 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_2C Tue_Nov_ 18_02: 18:38_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_2C Tue_Nov_ 18_02:24:41_201.4 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

File Name File Stamp Path

Description:

MHF_Liner_SOll.:_SUM_20 Comment: Calib Date 11/18/14 A

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiencv Report MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 02:31:34 1

Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

663.0[ 701.0I 102.61 703.0! 122.ol 723.ol 724.0! 870.0i 871.11 872.0i 1112.ol 1173.2 5.12e-008 5.08e-o*o8 5.07e"008 5.07e-008 5.0Se-008 5.0Se-008 5.0Se-008 4.93e-008 4.93e-008 4.93e-OOS 4.82e-008 4.82e-008 5.10e-OOB 5.06e-008 5.05e-008 5.0Se-008 5.03e-OOB 5.03e-OOB 5.03e-008 4.91e-OOB 4.91e-OOB 4.91ei-008 4.81e-008 4.80e-008 5.13e-008 5.0Se-008 5.08e"OOB 5.08e-008 5.06e-008 5.05e-008 5.0Se-008 4.93e-008 4.93e-008 4.93e-008 4.82e-008 4.82e-ooa 5.69e-008 5.65e-008 5.65e-008 5.65e-OOB 5.63e-008 5.63e-008 5.63e-008 5.53e-008 5.53e-008 5.53e-008 5.48e-008 5.48e-008 2.10e-007 2.09e-007 2.0Se-007 2.09e-007 2.08e-007 2.oae-007 2.0Se-007 2.03e-007 2.03e-007 2.03e-007 1.99e-007 1.99e-007 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files.

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-SMSIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Sltu\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_Liner_SOIL_SUM_20 Calib Date 11 118114

~

CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report MLiltiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 02:31 :34 2

Primary Efficiency tak.en from ECC files, for set energies ~:

1174.o: 1213.ol 1274.41 1275.o: 1331.ol 1332.5* . - *-1334.01 1406.0i 1407.9~ 1409.0i 1460.8 4.82e-008 4.80e-008 4.79e-008 4.79e-008 4.78e-008 4.77e-008 4.77e-oo8 4.72e-008 4.72e-008 4.72e-008 4.68e-008 4.80e-008 4.78e-008 4.78e-008 4.78e-008 4.76e-008 4.76e-008 4.76e-008 4.71e-008 4.71e-008 4.71ec008 4.67e-008 4.82e-008 4.SOe-008 4.SOe-008 4.80e-008 4.78e-008 4.78e-008 4.77e-008 4.72e-008 4.72e-008 4.72e-008 4.68e-008 5.48e-008 5.46e-008 5.46e-008 5.46e-008 5.44e-008 5.44e-008 5.44e-008 5.42e"008 5.42e-008 5.41e-008 5.40e-008 1.99e-007 1.98e-007 1.98e-007 1.98e-007 1.98e-007 1.98e-007 1.97e-007 1.96e-007 1.96e-007 1.96e-007 1.94e-007 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.0oe+ooo 4.00e+OOO 4.00e.+000 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files.

C:IGENIE2K\isocsldata\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:IG ENIE2K\isocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI C:IGENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-SMSIMPLE_BQXI C:\G ENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRYl1n-Situ\SI MPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_Liner_SOIL_SUM_20 Calib Date 11 /18/14 Multi-Effidenc MultiEfficiency Report/Style2// Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 02:31:34 3

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multiefficiency\MHF Li ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:31:57 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil SUM D20.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 03:02:26 - - - -

Template: (SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom

Description:

MHF Liner SUM 20 - - -

Comment: ISOCS:Cali(l Date 11/18/14 Detectcir: (3994)+(3996)+(3997)+(3998)+

Collimator: (GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN_Gl)+(GARDIAN_Gl)+

Convergence: l.Od % - -

Area [Sq Meters]: 1.0000e-004 (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.0000e+boo (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculat~d by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58 .,00 4.45256e-012 10.0 0.0000000 64000 59.54 9.97480e-012 10.0 0.0000000 64000

61. 00 1.98229e-011 10. 0 Q.0000000 64000 311. 00 2.33129e-007 10.0 0.0000000 64000 311. 98 2 . .33014e-007 10. 0 0.0000000 64000 313.00 2. 3304,8e-007 10.0 0.. 0000000 64000 343.00 2.31824e-007 8.0 0.0000000 64000 344.27 2.31697e-007 8.0 0.0000000 64000 345.00 2 . 31 7 4 8 e.- 0 0 7 8.0 0.0000000 64000 660.00 2.10695e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 6'61. 65 2.10396e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 663.00 2.10415e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 701. 00 2.08676e-007 6,0 0.0000000 64000 702.63 2. 08470e-0_07 6.0 0.0000000 _64000 703.00 2.08512e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 722.00 2.07719e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 723'. 00 2.07648e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 724. 00 2.07635e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 870.06 2.03013e-007 6.0 0.0000000 64000 871.10 2.02925e-007- 6.0 0.0000000 64000 872. 00 2.03011e-007 6 .. 0 0.0000000 64000 1172.00 1. 993lle-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1173 ,,22 1.99247e-007 4.0 0;0000000 64000 1174.00 1.99173e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1273.00 1,98335e-007 4. 0 0.0000000 64000 1274.45 1.9829ie-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1275.00 1.982soe-001 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1331.00 1.97555e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1332.49 1.97559e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 133*4. 00 1. 97 4 96e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1406.00 1.95620e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1407.95 1.95604e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1409.0Q 1.95632e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 1460.80 1. 94231e-007 4.0 0.0000000 64000 TBD-401 Page 45of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Effl_ciency Calibration Curve

/ D Measured - - Calculated /

2,5e-007

~r~

2e-007 N~III J

l I I T-1? 1 I

1.5e-007 1e-007 5e-008 0

0

) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Dalasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 46of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-006

--t- -*-~

-- 0 1e-Ob7

)

I I

I 1e-008 I

I I t-C-f-1e-009 I

J 1e-010 I

t-C-f-I

.{ '*'

1e-011

~f-1e-012 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 47of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results GARDIAN SYSTEM Ca!ilbratfton Records MHF IP-1 Intermodal with Liner Density 1.6 TBD-401 Page 48 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:42:56

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: = =

Temperature 65 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: =

Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN 24 (16)! CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (Inches)

No.

Description:

d.:1: '* - cU. d;3" ., -.d;4_ * *, d;S'"* d.6 Mati;ir:lal\ *~nslt\f,* Rel~:eo_nc.

1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2' 0.02756 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 3443 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724,0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 jstMPLE sox j Do--~~

6.3

..-l TBD-401 Page 49 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroS hield Modeling Results Geo etry Cotnposer Report A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:42:56

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Pag e 50 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C: \GENIE2K\isocs \data \GEOMETRY\In-Si tu \SIMPL.E BOX\MHF Liner ~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:03:44 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DETl 16.CAL Genie.*. Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:39:22 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF Liner Dl 16 Comment: Isocs:CAL DATE 18 - 14 Detector: 3994 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.8705e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Vaiue calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 6.33573e-013 10.0 0.087456 81760 59.54 1.53396e-012 lQ.O 0.080981 81760

61. 00 3.2477o'e-012 10.0 0.075679 81760 311. 00 7.09848e-008 10.0 -0.028446 81760 311. 98 7.09546e-008 10.0 -0.028008 81760 313.00 7.09817e-008 10.0 -0.028447 81760 343.00 7.09089e-008 8.0 -0.030478 81760 344.27 7.08720e-008 8.0 -0. 030225 '81760 345.00 7.08902e-008 8.0 -0.030508 81760 660.00 6.36907e-008 6.0 -0.031712 81760 661.65 6.35930e-008 6.0 -0.031830 81760 663.00 6.35986e-008 6.0 -0.031523 81760 701.00 6,30231e'-008 6.0 -0. 031072 81760 702.63 6.29504e-008 6.0 -0.031264 81760 703.00 6.29676e-008 6.0 -0.031268 81760 722. 00 6.27029e-008 6.0 -0. 031150 81760 723. 00 6. 26720e-:-008 6.0 -0. 03092.9 81760 724. 00 6.26706e-008 6.0 -0.030975 81760 870.00 6 .10965e-008 6.0 . -0.029119 81760 871.10 6.10659e-008 6.0 -0. 029118 81760 872. 00 6.10924e-008 6.0 -0. 028929 81760 1172. 00 5. 97013e-Q08 4.0 -0. 025862 81760 1173. 22 5.96696e-008 4. 0 -0.025795 81760 1174.00 5.96471e-008 4. 0 -0.025642 81760 1273.00 5.93596e-008 4.0 -0.024495 81760 12-7 4 .* 45 5.93432e-008 4.0 -0.024726 81760 12.75.00 5. 934.16e-008 4.0 -0.024583 .81760 1331.00 5. 91092e-008 4.0 -0.023944 81760 1332.49 5.90960e-008 4.0 -0.023895 81760 1334.00 5.90698e-008 4.0 ...:0.024160 81760 1406.00 5.83823e-008 4.0 -0.023088 81760 1407.95 5.83819e-008 4.0 -0.023105 81760 1409.00 5.83999e-008 4.0 -0.022994 81760 1460.80 5.78899e-008 4.0 -0.022531 81760 TBD-401 Page 51 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results h1terpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D *Measured - - Calculated*-]

8e-008 7e-008 ~**-

~

1 6e-008

"-tkL I

I I I I

-y--y--tf r I

5e-008 4e-008 3e-OOB 2e-OOB 1e-008 I

0 -

j 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 52 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1e-007 liliJ

""cl. H I

1e-008 I

I 1e-009 I

I I

I 1e-01 O I

I I

1e-011 1e-012 1e-013 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasouri:e: DET02 TBD-401 Page 53 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:43:58

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_16 Comment: Calib Date 11/18/14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_16.geo Software: ISO CS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN G1 (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN ::: 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

Ni> *. Desgiptl(ln .d;f d.2. .d:3; *~ d:4* d.~:* d.6 .- .. (\'l~t(lrlal: .* ::O~nslty .lt(ll; <;one; 1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 d.irtl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mt.wall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Oetector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency cuive generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0. 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 ls1MPLE sox I y l:;

Do--~!

~3

>---------~!

© 0 6.2 rl TBD-401 Page 54of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Geometry 'ompos .r Report A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:43:58

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_16 Comment: Calib Date 11/18/14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-40 1 Page 55 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISQCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENit2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In~Situ\SIMPLE BbX\MHF Liner ~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:11:20 - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET2 16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:47:01 - - -

Template: SI,MPLE BOX Geom

Description:

MHF Liner D2 16 Comment: ISOCS:CALIB DATE 11/18/14 Detector: 3996 - - .

Collimator; GARDIAN Gl Convergence: i.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8. 3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: . 2.8705e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value motjified by us~r Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Conve.rgence Final # of Voxels 58.00 5. 62258e-013 10.0 0.094637 81760 59.54 1. 37243e-012 10.0 0.088870 81760

61. 00 2.92622e-012 10.0 0.084219 81760 311. 00 7.05694e'-008 10.0 -0. 011033 81760 311. 98 7. 05402e.-008 10. 0 -0. 0106.57 81760 313.00 7.05681e-008 10.0 -0.011217 81760 343.00 7.05194e-008 8.0 -0.014503 81760 344.27 7.04837e-008 8.0 -0.014262 81760 345.00 7.05023e-008 8.0 -0.014571 81760 660.00 6.34421e-008 6.0 -0.024023 81760 661.65 6.33451e-008 6.0 -0.024133 81760 663.00 6.33509e-008 6.0 -0.023852 81760 701. 00 6.27842e-008 6.0 -0.023817 81760 702.63 6.27121e-008 6.0 -0.024038 '81760 703.00 6. 27293e.-008 6.0 -0.024020 81760 722.00 6.24686e-008 6.Q -0.0.24027 81760 723. 00 6.24'.380e-008 6.0 -0.023912 81760 724. 00 6.24367e-008 6.0 -0.023954 81760 870.00 6.08879e-008 6.0 -0.023104 81760 871.10 6.08575e-008 6.0 -0.023070 81760 872.oo 6.08840e-008 6.0 -0. 0.22897 81760 1172.00 5.9!)253e-008 4. 0 -0.020810 81760 1173.22  !?.94938e-008 4.0 -0.020712 81760 1174.00 .5. 94715e-008 4.0 -0.020544 81760 1273.00 5.91917e-008 4. 0 -0.019544 81760 1274.45 5.91754e-008 4.0 -0.0.19792 81760 1275.00 5.91739e-008 4.0 -D.019687 81760 1331, 00 5.89455e-008 4.0 -0.019028 81760 1332.49 5.89325e-008 4.0 -Q.018976 81760 1334*. 00 5.89065e-008 4. 0 -0.019266 81760 1406.00 5.82248e-008 4.0 -0.018140 81760 1407.95 5.82245e-008 4. 0 -0.018191 81760 1409.00 5.8242('.ie-008 4.0 -0.018104 81760 1460.80 5.77366e-008 4.0 -0.017642 81760 TBD-401 Page 56 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 8e-008

?e-008

~

6e-008

~tI I I I

'I I -irt-T t 5e-008 4e-008 3e-ooa 2e-008 1e-008 I

o :I:

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (ke\I)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 57of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration c~rve I o Measured - - Calculated I 1e-007 I

/'

1e-008 I

I I

1e-009 I

I I

1e-010 I

I 1e-011 I

1-~

I*

1e-012 1e-013 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasourte: DET02 TBD-401 Page 58 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results CAN8ERl~A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 ~ 15:44:57

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3:_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_1!3_i4 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70°io Integration:

• Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. Des<:rlj:JtiC>!:' d;l" d.2. d;~,, d;4* *".. 'd*.5' ~d;G.* :;.1 Material;;* . ,De11~ltv lt~I~' COile*

1 Box 0.35 230 61 BS esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dlrtl 1.6 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 stwall i.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 germanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.o 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 ls11.1PLE sox I Do--t~

G.3

~~ {

6.2 TBD-401 ' Page 59 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results eometry Composer Report A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:44:57

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 60 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF_Liner_~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Ti~e; 11/18/14 02:17~45 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET3 16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:51:10 - - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

MHF Liner D3 16 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE_ll_l8_14 Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8,j097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams] : 2. 870Se+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 8.47855e-013 10.0 0.0864i:i2. 81760 59.54 2.00758e-012 10.0 0.080053 81760 61.00 4.16993e-012 10.0 0.074815 81760 311. 00 7.11112e-008 10.0 -0.028445 81760 311. 98 7.10800e-008 10.0 -0.028007 81760 313.00 7 .11061e-b08 10.0 -0.028446 81760 343.00 7.10079e-008 8.0 -0.030476 81760 344.27 7.0970le-Q08 8.0 -0.030223 81760 345.00 7.09879e-008 8.0 -0.030506 81760 660.00 6.37182e-008 6.0 -0.031710 81760 661. 65 6.36204e-008 6.0 -0.031829 81760 663.00 6.36259e-008 6.0 -0.031521 81760 701.00 6.30486e-008 6.0 -b.031071 81760 702 . .63 6.29758e-008 6.0 -0.031262 81760 703.00 6.29930e-.008 6.0 -0.031267 8'17 60 722. 00 6. 2727 4e-008 6.0 -0. 031148 81760 723.00 6.26965e-008 6.0 -0.030927 81760 724. 00 6.26950e-008 6.0 -0.030973 81760 870.00 ().11164e-008 6.b -0.029117 81760 871.10 6.10858e-008 6.0 -0. 029116 81760 872. 00 6.11123e-008 6.0 -0.028928 81760 1172. 00 5.97174e-008 4.0 -0.0258Eil 81760 1173.22 5.96856e-008 4.0 -0 .'025794 81760 i174.00 5.96632e-008 4. 0 -0.025640 81760 1273.00 5.93758e-008 4. 0 -0.024494 81760 1274.45 5.93594e-008 4. 0 -0. 024725 81760-1275.00 5.93579e-008 4,0 -0. 02458.1 81760 1331. 00 5.91258e-008 4.0 -0.023943 81760 1332.49 5.91126e-008 4. 0 -0.023893 81760 1334. 00 5,90864e-008 4. 0 -0.024159 81760 1406.00 5.83996e-008 4.0 -0.023087 81760 1407.95 5.83992e-008 4.0 -0.023104 81760 1409.00 5.84172e-008 4.0 -0.022993 81760 1460.80 5:79079e-008 4.0 -0.022530 81760 TBD-401 Page 61 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I El Measured - - Calculated I Be-008

.~.

7e-008

~

6e-008 N4 I

• 1 l

t I I ::J;

'l_j l T 5e-008 4e-008 3e-008 l

2e-008 1e-008 I

0 .-

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 '2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 62 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results lnt'3rpolated Efficiency CaHbration Curve I B Measured - - .Calculated I 1e-007

.. ~'-"1-i! ..

I 1e-OOB I

I 1e-009 I

I I

1e-010 I

~*-~

1 1e-011 1e-012 1e-013 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 63 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results CANBEl~RA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:45:55

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DEf4_16.g'eo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Conver~ence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches) d;G,

.. *.. * *Density' No; d;2 ,ll;;J. Ma~erlal' Rei;:con*.:~

,~

Descrlptjon - d.1 "d<3  :~ d.5 1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 none 3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirt! 1.6 1.00 4 Absorberl 0.282 st:.vall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.o 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 *1460.8 Js11.1FLE sox I t -x Lz t

6.3' 6.2

..J TBD-401 Page 64of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

eometry Co poser Report _,A N RA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:45:55

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_16 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_16.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 65 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In~situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF Liners ISdCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:23!20 - . - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET4 16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:56:41 - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

MHF Liner D4 *16 Comment: ISOCS: CAL DATE 11 18 14 Detector: 3998 - - -

Collj_mator: GARDTAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.8705e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modifi~d by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of V~xels 58.00 3.51674e-012 10.0 -0.106567 81760 59.54 7.54136e-012 10.0 -0. 099314 81760 61.00 1,44079e-011 10.0 -0.092374 81760 311. 00 7. 72792e-008 10.0 -0.005557 8.17 60 311.98 7. 72379e-008 10.0 -0. 005596 81760 313.00 7. 71930e-008 10.0 -0.005423 81760 343.00 7.58412e-008 8.0 -0.007321 81760 344.27 7.57938~-008 8.0 -0.007034 81760 345.00 7.57900e-008 8.0 -0.007220 .81760 660.00 7. 0684.3e-008 6.0 -0.014125 81760 661.65 7.06013e-008 6.0 -0.014153 81760 663.00 7.06135e-008 6.0 -0.013945 81760 701. 00 7. 01071e-008 6.0 -0.014423 81760 702.63 7.00797e-008 6.o -0. 014372 81760 703.0ci 7.00782e-008 6.0 -0.014428 81760 722.00 6.98590e-008 6.0 -0.014472 81760 723. 00 6.98589e-008 6.0 -0.014555 81760 724. 00 6.98474e-008 6.0 -0.014714 81760 870.00 6.86345e-008 6.0 -0.014608 81760 871.10 6.86220e-008 6.0 -0. 014296 81760

~72. 00 6.86383e-008 6.0 -0.014513 81760 1172*. 00 6. 7 903le-008. 4.0 -0.012609 81760 1173.22 6.79035e-008 4.0 -0.012484 81760 1174.00 6.78775e-008 4.0 -b.012206 81760 1273.00 6.76033e-008 4.0 -0. 011848 81760 1274.45 6. 7 5953~-008 4. 0 -0. 011803 8.1760 1275.00 6.75882e-008 4.0 -0. 011577 81760 1331. 00 6.73464e-008 4.0 -o-0. 011334 81760 1332.49 6.73795e-008 4. 0 -0.011289 81760 1334.00 6. 7365*5e-008 4. 0 -0.011341 81760 1406.00 6.70369e-008 4.0 -0.010037 81760 1407.95 6.70080e-008 4.0 -0.010066 81760 1409.00 6.69899e-008 4.0 -0.009990 81760 1460.80 6.67418e-008 4.0 -0. 009666 81760 TBD-401 Page 66 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculaled j 8e-008

~ ~lll I 1e-ooa 11r--r t

.L tt+-t 6e-008 -

5e-008 4e-008 3e-008 -

2e-008 1e-008 ~I 0 -'"

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Dala$ource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 67 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield M,odeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I El Measured - - .Calculaled I 1e-007 I

I 1e-008 I

I I

I 1e-009 I

I I

v I/

1e-010 I

I/

I

{

1e-011 1e-012 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 68 of 101

I Primary Efficiency taken from ECC files. for set energies~:

1. *Weight I----

58.0 59.5i 61.01 311.0i 312.0l 313.01 343.0 344.3! 345.0I 660.0! 661.7 1 1.000 6.34e,013 1.53e-012 3.25e-012 7.10e-008 7.10e-Q08 7.10e-008 7.09e-008 7.09e-00_8 7.09e-008 6.37e-008 6.36e-008 2 1.000 5.62e-013 1.37e-012* 2.93e-012 7.06.e-008 7.05e-008 7.06e-008 7.0Se-008 7.05e-008 7.05e-008 6.34e-008 6.33e-008 3 1.000 8.48e-013 2.01e-012 4.17e-012 7.11e-008 7.11e-008 7,11e-008 7.10e-008 7.10e-008 7.10e-008 6.37e-008 6.36e-008 4 1.000 3.52e-012 7.5'1e-012 1.44e~o11 7-.73e-008 7.72e-008 7.72e-008 7.58e-008 7,58e-008 7.58e-008 7.07e-008 7.06e-008

-Sum 5.56e-012 1.25e-011 2.48e-011 2.90e-007 2.90e-007 2.90e-007 2.88e-007 2.88e-007 2.88e-007 2.62e-007 2.61e-007 Error,% 1.ooei-001 1.00ei-001 1.00ei-001 1.00ei-001 1.00ei-001 1.00e;t-001 8.00ei-000 8.00e,+-000 8.00ei-000 6.00e+oOO 6.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files File Name File.Stamp Path 1 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_1E Tue_Nov_ 18_02:02:51_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

2 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_1E Tue_Nov_ 18_02: 10:28..;.2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

3 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_1E Tue_Nov_ 18:...02: 16:52..:.2014 C:\GENIE2k\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 MHF_Liner_~OIL_DET4_1E Tue_Nov_ 18_02:22:28_2014 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

File Name Fil? Stamp Path

Description:

MHF_Liner_SOIL_SUM_16

-I Comment Calib Date 11/18/14 CD 0

.),..

~

A

• CANBERRA Muiti-Efficiency Report "1J Dl (Q

Cl>

O>

CD

~

0 MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 II Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 02:30:04 1

Primaiy Efficiency taken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

663.ol 701.0i 102.6! 703.0i 122.ol 723.0I 724.ol 870.0 871.1 i 872.0, 1172.0i 1173.2 6.36e-008 6.30e-008 6.30e-008 6.30e-008 6.27e-008 6.27e-008 6.27e-008 6.11e-008 6.11e~oo8 6.11e-008 5.97e-.008 5.97e-008 6.34e-008 6.28e-008 6.27e-008 6.27e-008 6.25e-008 6.24e~ooa 6.24e-008 6.09e-008 6.09e-008 6.09e-008 s.sse~oo8 5.95e-008 6~36e-008 6.30e-008 6.30e-008 6.30e-008 6.27e-008 6.27e-008 6.27e-008 6.11e-008* 6.11e-008 6.11e-008 5.97e-008 5.97e-008 7.06e-008 7.01e~ooa 7.01e-008 7.01e-oos* 6.99e-008 6.99e-008 6.98e-008 6.86e-008 6.86e-008 6.86e-008 6.79e-008 6.79e-008 2.61e-007 2.59e-007 2.59e-007 2.59e-007 2.58e-007 2.58e-007 2.s8e-001 2.52e-007 2.52e-007 2.52e-OOT 2.47e-007 2.47e-007 6.00e+OOO 6.0.0e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OQP 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\G EN IE2K\isocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMRLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\Jn-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\G ENI E2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_Liner_SOIL_SUM_16 Calib Date 11/18/14 CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 02:30:04 2

Primar Efficiency taken from ECC files_, for set energies (keV)_~-------

1114.ol 1213.ol 1274.41 1215.o: 1331.ol 1332.5\ 1334.0i 1406.0i 1407.91 1409;0i 1460.8 5.96e-008 5.94e-008 5.93e-008 5.93e-008 5.91e-008 5.91e-008 5.91e-008 5.84e-008 5.84e-008 5.84e-008 5.79e-008 5.95e-008 5.92e-008 5.92e-008 5.92e-008 5.89e-008 5.89e-008 5.89e-008 5.82e~008 5.82e-008 5.82e-008 5.77e-008 5.97e-008 5.94e-008 5.94e-008 5.9~008 5,s1e-oos 5.91e-008 5.91e.008 5.84e-008 5.84e-008 5.84e-008 5.79e-008 6.79e-008 6.76e-008 6.76e-008 6.76e-008 6.73e-008. 6.74e-008 6.74e-008 6.70e-008 6.70e-008 6.70e-008 6.67e-008 2.47e-007 2.46e-007 2.45e-007 2.45e-007 2.45e-007 2.45e-007 2.44e-007 2.42e,007 2.42e-007 2.42e-007 2.40e-007 4:ooe+ooo 4.00e+OOO 4;ooe+000 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

.C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln"Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF:._Liner_S_QIL,_SUM_16 Calib Date 11118114 AN BERRA Mu!ti-Efficienc MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 02:30:04 3

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS

\

ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multieffidien6y\MHF Li ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:30:26 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil SUM D16.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 03:01:18 - - - -

Template: (SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

G.eom

Description:

MHF Liner SUM 16 - - -

Comment: ISOCS: Calib Date 11/18/14 DeteGtor: (3994)+(3996)+(3997)+(3998)+

Collimator: (GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN_Gl)+(GARDIAN_Gl)+

Convergence: 1.00 % - -

Area [Sq Meters]: 1.0000e-004 (t)

Mass [Grams]: 1.0000e+OOO (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficienc;:y %Uncertainty .%Convergence Final j~ of Vox~ls 58.00 5.56043e-012 10.0 0.0946370 64000 59.54 1.24553e-011 10.0 0.0946370 64000

61. 00 2.47518e-011 10.0 0.0946370 64000 311. 00 2.89945e-007 10.0 0.0946370 64000 311. 98 2.89813e-007 10.0 0.0946370 64000

.313.00 2.89849e-007 10.0 0.0946370 64000 343.00 2.88277e-OQ7 8.0 0.0946370 64000 344.27 2.88120e-007 8.0 0.0946370 64000 345.00 2.88170e-007 8.0 0.0946370 64000.

660.00 2.61535e-007 6.0 0. 094 6370 64000 661.65 2. 61160e-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 663.00 2, 61189e-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 701. 00 2.58963e-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 702. 63 2.58718e-007 6 .. 0 0.0946370 64000 703.00 2.58768e-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 722. 00 2.57758e-007 6.0 0. 0946370 64000 723. 00 2. 57665e.-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 724.00 2.57650e-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 870.00 2.51735e-007 (3. 0 0.0946370 64000 871.10 2.5163le-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 872.00 2.51727e-007 6.0 0.0946370 64000 1172.00 2. 4 684 7e.-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1173.22 2.46753e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1174.00 2.46659e-007 4.0 0.0946370 6AOOO 1273.00 2.45530e-007 4.0 0.0946370 6400Q 1274.45 2.45473e-007 4.0 o*. 0946370 64000 1275.00 2. 454 62.e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1331.00 2.44527e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1332.49 2.44521e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1334.00 2.44428e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1406.00 2.42044e-007 4.0 0. 094 6370 64000 1407.95 2.42014e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1409.00 2.42050e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 1460.80 2.40276e-007 4.0 0.0946370 64000 TBD-401 Page 72of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 3e-007 l*l1J~

2.Se-007

~I

~l-1 I I I

'~c. .l l II

/ I T I IT 2e-007 1.Se-007 1e-007 Se-008 0 .!.

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 73 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - C_alculaled I 1e-006

,.:.Cl 1e-007 I f

I f .

I 1e-009 I I

1e-010 f

)

1e-011 I

1e-012 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 74 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results GARDIAN SYSTEM Callibratfton Records MHF IP-1 Interruodal with Linet Density 1.2

\

TBD-401 Page 75 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:42:13

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_12.geo Software: ISO CS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Collimator: GAROIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: =

Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure 760 mm Hg, *Relative Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No. Description- - --d.1- d.2 d;3_ . .d:4:. d:G:. -* ~aterial '.D~ns'ty Rel; CC)~C. *'

1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 c:steel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer ' 56 dlrtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorberl 0.126 mtwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.02756 gennanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872;0 1172.0 11732 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.S 1334.0 140i5.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 jsu.1PLE sox I Do--~-

6.2 6.4....---:;;

-(-

5L A TBD-401 Page 76 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:42:13

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_1 8_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET1_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 77 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF Liner E ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 01:57:22 - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DETl 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: ll/l8/14 02:37:02 ~ - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

HMF Liner Dl 12 Comment: ISOCS:CAL DATE 11 18 14 Detector: 39.94 - - - -

Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.1529e+d07 (C)

Length [Meters]: n9t used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty *%Convergence Final # of Vdxels 58.00 8.44445e-013 io.o 0. 088722 91980 \

59.54 2.04422e-012 10,0 0.083712 91980

61. 00 4.32774e-012 to.o 0.079547 91980 311. 00 9.39137e-008 10.0 -0.024447 91980 311. 98 9.38764e-008 10.0 -0. 024172 91980 313. 00 9.39094e-008 10.0 -0.024589 919.80 343.00 9.37828e-008 8.0 -0.029085 91980 344.27 9.37350e-008 8.0 -0.029093 91980 345.00 9.37546e-008 8.0 -0.029295 91980 660.00 8.39616e-008 6.0 -0.040080 91980 661. 65 8.38325e-008 6.0 -0.040150 91980 663.00 8.38441e-008 6.0 -0.039926 91980 701.00 8.30464e-008 6.0 -0.039736 91980 702.63 8.29575e-008 6.0 -0.040105 91980 703.00 8.29767e-008 6.0 -0.040109 919.80 722 .. 00 8.26l40e-008 6.0 -0.040137 91980 723. 00 8. 25719e-008 6.0 -0.040063 91980 724. 00 8.25695e-008 6.0 -0.040080 91980 870.0b 8.03971e-008 6.0 -0.039646 91980 871.10 8.03602e-008 6.0 -0. 039647 91980 872. QO 8.03881e-008 6.0 -0.039589 91980 1172. 00 7.84016e-008 4. 0 -0.038832 91980 1173. 22 7.83568e-008 4.0 ....:o. 038'768 91980 1174.00 7.83257e-008 4.0 -0.038681 91980 1273. 00* 7.79048e,.-008 4.0 -0.038140 91980 1274.45 7.78840e-Q08 4.0 -0.038564 91980 1275.00 7.78828e-008 4.0 -0.038424 91980 1331. 00 7.75552e-008 4.0 -0. 038177 91980 1332.49 7.75367e-008 4.0 -0. 03815'2 91980 1334.00 7.74952e-008 4.0 -0.038306 91980 1406.00 7.65622e-008 4.0 -0.037686 91980 1407.95 7.65557e-008 4.0 -0.037724 91980 1409.00 7.65790e-008 4.0 -0. 037724 91980 1460.80 7.58944e-008 4.0 -0.0-37543 91980 TBD-401 Page 78of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - - Calculated I 1e-007 l*ll~

Nk1I I

ae-ooa II

-+=tfbl I T 6e-d08 4e-008 2e-008 0

0

) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV) batasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 79 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o ' Measured - - Calculal~d I 1e-007 . '

I I

I 1e-008 I

I I

1 e-009 I

I I

1e-010 I

t-- - t - t-f-I/

1e-011 1e-012 te-013 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 80of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:43:35

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_Dm_12 Comment: . calib. Date 11/18/14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_Dm_l2.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: =

Temperature 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative* Humidity =70%

Integration: = =

ConvergE!nce 1.00%, MDRPN 24 (16), CRPN 24 (16) =

Dimensions (inches)

No; Desi:rlptiini "d;l' *d*~; d_i3 .ci:<i .*'*d.5; c1.a .* l\'l?tetfat *oen_sJty: R!'!f;.c~iic; 1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dlrtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.126 mlwall 3.7 5 Absorber2 0.0315 germanum 5.4 6 Source* Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 *57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460;8 fn.tPLE sox I Do----.-

6.3

~----...,....---6.l

©

© TBD-401 Page 81 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Geom t y Composer Report A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:43:35

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_12 Comment: Calib. Date 11/18/14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 82 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF_Liner_~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:09:12 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET2 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:45:01 - - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

MHF Liner D2 12 Comment: ISOCS:CALIB. DATE_ll/18/14 Detector: 3996 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.1529e+007 (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency 5\;Uncertainty %Convergence Final ff of Voxels 58.00 7.4928le-013 10.0 0.08071'2 91980 59.54 1. 82865e-012 10.0 0.075307 "91980

61. 00 3.89860e-012 10.0 0.070819 91980 311. 00 9.32928e-008 10.0 -0. 015912 91980 311.98 9.3257le-008 10.0 -0.015573 91980 313. 00 9.32912e-008 10.0 -0.016074 91980 343.00 9.32008e-008 8.0 -0.019763 91980 344.27 9.31546e-008 8.0 -0. 019620 91~80 345.00 9.31749e-008 8.0 -0.019843 91980 660.00 8.35990e-008 6.0 -0.024412 91980 661.65 8.34709e-008 6.0 -0.024446 91980 663.00 8.34829e-008 6.0 -0.024199 91980 701.00 8.26989e-008 6:0 -0.023559 91980 702.63 8.261o7e-008 6.0 -0.023862 91980 703.00 8.26299e-oo8 6.0 -0.023859 91980 722.00 8.22735e-oo8 6.o -o .. 023657 91980 723. 00 8.22317e-oo8 6.o -0.023631 91980 724.00 8.222978-008 6.0 -0.023607 91980 870.00 8.00963e-Q08 6.0 -0.022100 91980 871.10 8.00597e-008 6.0 -0.022050 91980 872. 00 8.00876e-008 6.0 -0.021960 91980 1172.00 7.81512e-008 4. 0 -0.020953 91980 1173.22 7.81067e-008 4.0 -0.020829 91980 1174.00 7.80758e-Obs 4. 0 -0.020713 91980 1273.00 7. 76695e-00f3 4. 0 -0.019922 91980 1274.45 7.76458e-008 4.0 -0.020353 91980 1275.00 7.76447e-008 4. 0 -0.020202 91980 1331. 00 7.73233e-008 4.0 -0.019823 91980 1332. 49 7.73050e-008 4.0 -0.019768 91980 i334.00 7. 72638e-008 4. 0 -0.019926 91980 1406.00 7.63395e-008 4. 0 -0.019253 n98o 1407.95 7.63332e-008 4.0 -0.019349 91980 1409.00 7.63565e-008 4.0 -0.019317 91980 1460.80 7. 56779e-008 4.0 -0.019099 91980 TBD-401. Page 83of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculated I/

1e-007

~I~

Be-008 ~L-

. T -t=f.F.k1 l T 6e-008 4e-008 I

2e-008 0 -

~

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 84 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I o Measured - - Calculated I 1e-007 *\I: __,

I I

1e-008 I

I I

1e-009 I

I C-f-I 1e-010 I

J 1e-011 I

-- . -*** - - - r -

1e-012 1e-013 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasour_ce: DET02 TBD-401 Page 85 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results CANf.3ERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:44:35 Descripl:ion: MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 Fil~ Name: E;\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 70%

Integral:ion: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (inches)

No,"

Description:

d.1 *d.2" d;3 ~ [l;<J ~,s*. cl_;~ *_M_atelial p~nsity R.~1;* coric:.

1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dirtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 st:wall 1.4 5 Absorber2 0.03543 gennanum 5.4 6 Source-Detector 55.5 57.5 0 57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation

• 58.0 5.9.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 js1MFLE .sox I Do---.--

6.3 TBD-401 Page 86 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

Geome ry Composer port CAN Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:44:35

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version : (default)

TBD-401 Page 87of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isqcs\d~ta\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF Liner~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:15:59 - - -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET3 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:49:44 - - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

MHF Liner D3 12 Comment: I SOCS: CAL DATE_11_)8_14 Detector: 3997 Coliimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8. 3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.1529e+007 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Vaiue calculated by rs_ocs (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %0nGertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 1.13002e-012 10.0 0.088202 91980 59.54 2;67532e-012 10.() 0.083271 91980

61. 00 5.55651e-012 10.0 0.079174 91980 311. 00 9. 408_09e-008 10.0 ~0.024436 91980 311. 98 9.40422e-008 10.0 -0.024161 91980 313.00 9.40739e~oo8 10.0 -0. 02457_8 91980 343.00 9.39137e,.-008 8.0 -0.029076 91980 344.27 9.38646e-008 8.0 -0.029084 91980 345.00 9.3S836e-008 8.0 -01. 029287 91980 666.oo 8.39979e-008 6.0 -0. 0.40078 91980 661. 65 8.38686e-008 6.0 -0.040148 91980 663.00 8.38801e-008 6.0 -0.039924 91980 701. 00 8.30800e-d08 6.0 -0.039734 91980 702.63 8.29909e-008 6.0 -0.040103 91980 .

703.00 8.30i01e-008 6.0 -0.040107 91980 722. 00 8.26463e-008 6.0 -0.040135 91980 723. 00 8.26041e-008 6.0 -0.040061 91980 724. 00 8.26017e-008 6.0 -0.040078 91980 870.00 8.04233e-008 6.0 -0.039645 91980 871.10 8.03864e-008 6.0 -0.039646 91980 872. 00 8.04142e-008 6.0 -0.039588 91980 1172,00 7.84227e-008 4.0 -0.038831 91980 1173.22 7.83779e-008 4.0 -0.038767 91980 1174.00 7.83468e-008 4.. 0 -0.038679 91980 1273.00 7.79261e-008 4.0 -0.0381;39 91980 1274.45 7.79052e-008 4.0 -0. 038563 . 91980 1275.00 7.79041e~008 4.. 0 -0.038423 91980 l.331. 00 7.75769e-008 4.0 -0.038176 91980 1332.49 7.75585e-008 4. 0 -0.038151 .91980 1334.00 7.75170e-008 4.0 -0.038305 91980 1406.00 7.65849e-008 4.0 -0.037685 91980 1407.95 7.65783e-008 4. 0 -0.037723 91980 1409.00 7.66017e-008 4. 0 -0.037723 91980 1460.80 7.59180e-008 4.0 -0.037542 91980 TBD-401 Page 88 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - C~lculated I 1e-007

~I~

ae~ooa "i*=f- =1-==tt#

6e-OOB 4e-008 2e-OOB 0

0

) 500 1QOO 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 89 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated \

1e-007  ;-");. ~~\ ..

I I

1e-008 I I I

I I

1e-009 I \

I 7

I I

1e-010 I

I/

I I/

1e-011 l*l I

1e-012 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 90of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results I>\

CANBERRA Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:45:33

Description:

MHF_Liher_SOIL_DET4_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18__:14

'- File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_12.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Coliimator: GARDIAN Gl (GARDIAN 1 COLLIMATION MODEL)

Environment: Temperature = 65 °F, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Rela.tive Humidity = 70%

Integration: Convergence == 1.00%, MDRPN == 24 (16), CRPN == 24 (16)

Dimensions (Inches}

No *. l)escriptlon. - I '~' '

d;i' - d;2' ,d:3 *--d:4:. d.5. -. d.6

• Materia[ .' ;Denslfy.: Rei..())nc.

1 Box 0.35 230 61 85 esteel 7.9 2 Source - Top Layer 0 none 3 Source - Bottom Layer 56 dlrtl 1.2 1.00 4 Absorber! 0.282 st.wall 1.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 Source-Detector 55.5 -57.5 0 -57.5 0 List of energies for efficiency cuive generation 58.0 59.5 61.0 311.0 312.0 313.0 343.0 344.3 345.0 660.0 661.7 663.0 701.0 702.6 703.0 722.0 723.0 724.0 870.0 871.1 872.0 1172.0 1173.2 1174.0 1273.0 1274.4 1275.0 1331.0 1332.5 1334.0 1406.0 1407.9 1409.0 1460.8 jsn.1PLE sox j Dq---.--

---

E-1

© 0

TBD-401 Page 91 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results A

etry Composer Repo A Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 15:45:33

==

Description:==

MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_12 Comment: CAL DATE 11_18_14 File Name: E:\SIMPLE_BOX\MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_12.geo Software: ISO CS Template: SIMPLE_BOX, Version: (default)

TBD-40 1 Page 92 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\SIMPLE BOX\MHF_Liner_~

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:21:37 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil DET4 12.CAL Genie Cal Time: 11/18/14 02:55:46 - - -

Template: SIMPLE BOX Geom

Description:

MHF Liner D4 12 Comment: ISOCS:CA~ DATE_11_18_14 Detector: 3998 Collimator: GARDIAN Gl Convergence: 1.0b %

Area [Sq Meters]: 8.3097e+OOO (C)

Mass [Grams]: 2.1529e+007 (C)

Length [Meters] : not µsed (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncert~linty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 58.00 4.68234e-012 10.0 0 .116420 9.1980 59.54 1.00389e-Oll 10.0 0.108744 91980

61. 00 l.91777e-Oll 10.0 0.102527 91980 311. 00 l.02179e-007 10.0 0.013974 91980 311. 98 1.02130e-007 10.0 0.013989 91.980 313;00 l.02066e-007 10.0 0. 013959 91980 343.00 1.00251~-007  !LO 0.010098 91980 344.27 l.00189e-007 8.0 0.010372 91980 345.00 l.00176e-007 8.0 0.010201 91980 660.00 9.31600e-008 6.0 -0.005344 91980 661.65 9.30496e-008 6.0 -0.005414 91980 663.00 9.30631e-008 6.0 -0. 005296 91980 701. 00 9.23664e-008 6.6 -0.006252 91980 702.63 9.23336e-008 6.0 -0.006233 91980 703.00 9.23319e-008. 6.0 -0.006247 91980 722. 00 9.20284e-008 6.0 -0.006577 91980 723. 00 9.20261e-008 6.0 -0.006624 91980 724. 00 9. 20116e-b08 6.0 -0.006718 91980 870.00 9.03228e-008 6.0 -0.008769 91980 871.10 9. 0304%-008 6.0 -0. 008496 91980 872. 00 9.03232e-008 6.0 -0.008707 91980 1172.00 8.91776e-008 4.0 -0.010700 91980 1.173. 22 8.91684e-008 4.0 -0.010604 91980 1174.00 8.91356e-008 4.0 -0.010369 91980 1273.00 8.87091e'-008 4. 0 -0.010596 91980 1274.45 8.86957e-008 4.0 -0.010662 91980 1275.00 8.86866e-008 4.0 -0.010661 91980 1331.00 8.83446e-008 4.0 -0.010712 91980 1332.49 8.83785e-008 4.0 -0.010676 91980 1334.00 8.83531e-008 4.0 -0.010758 91980 1406.00 8. 78860e-008 4.0 -0.010295 91980 1407.95 \ 8.78466e-008 4.0 -0 ..010282 91980 1409.00 8.7821.le-008 4.0 -0.010200 91980 1460.80 8.74575e-008 4.0 -0.010322 91980 TBD-401 Page 93 of 101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculated I 1.2e-007 1e-007 t~ --~ -+- 1 TT.l IT l l T

Be-008 6e-008 4e-008 2e-008 I

0 0

_)

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (kilV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 94of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Calibration Curve I D Measured - - Calculaled I 1e-006 1e-007 tom *II 'II I

I I/

1e-008 I

I 1e-009 I ~

I I/

I I

1e-010 I/

1e-011 1e-012 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 95of101

1. !------ i Primary Efficiency"taken from ECC files, for set energ,=ie-=-s-'-'(k=e-'-Y),,,_:_________

- I - I ---------------------------__,

_I Weight 58 . 0! 59 . 5: 61:0! 311.01 _ _____;3:....:1.::=2:.=c.0:1_----"-31.:..;:3::..:.o:..l._______;:3'-"4-'-'3.c=..O_- ____344"-'-'='31 _ _ _34_5_.0 _ _ _6_6_0_.0_' ____6_61_.7 1 1.000 8.44e-013 2.04e-012 4.33e-012 9.39e-008 9.39e-008 9.39e,008 9.38e-008 9.37e-008 9.38e-008 8.40e-008 8.38e-008 2 1.000 7.49e-013 1.83e-012 3.90e-012 9.33e-008 9.33e-008 9.33e-008 9.32e-008 9.32e-008 9.32e-008 8.36e-008 8.35e-008 3 1.000 1.13e-012 2.68e-012 5.56e-012 9.41e-008 9.40e-008 9.41e-008 9.39e-008 9.39e-008 9.39e-008 8.40e-008 8.39e-008 4 1.000 4.68e-012 1.00e-011 1.92e-011 1.02e-007 1.02e-007 1.02e-007 1.00e-007 1.00e-007 1.00e-007 9.32e-008 9.30e-008 Sum 7.41e-012 1.66e-011 3.30e-011 3.83e-007 3.83e-007 3.83e-007 3.81e-007 3.81e-Oci7 3.81e-007 3.45e-007 3.44e-007 Error,% 1.00e+-001 1.00e+-001 1..Qoe+-001 1.00e+-001 1.00e+-001 1.00e-+-001 8.00e-+-000 8 . 00e+-000 8.00e+-000 6.00e+-000 6.00e-+-000 Information for input ECC files File Name File Stamp Path MHF_Liner:.._SOIL_DET1_1~ Tue_Nov_18_01:56:23_2014 C:\GENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETR'(\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI 2 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET2_ 1~ Tue_Nov_ 18_02:08:12_2014. C:\GENIE2K\i_socs\data\GEOMETRY11n-Situ\SIMPLE_BOXI 3 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET3_1~ Tue_Nov_ 18_02:15:00_2014 C:IGENIE2Klisocsldata\GEOMETRY11n-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

4 MHF_Liner_SOIL_DET4_ 1~ Tue_Nov_ 18_02:20:38_2014 C:IGENIE2Klisocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved filewith miJltiefficiency data:

File Name File Stamp Path

Description:

MHF_Liner_SOIL~SUM_12 Comment: Cafib Date 11/18/14 CANBERRA Multi-Efficiency Report MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, _02:28:01 1

Primary Efficienc).' taken fi"om ECC.files, for set energies ~:

663.0! 701.0! 702.6! 703.0] 722.0i 723.0! 724.0! 870.0) 871.1 i 872.0J 1172.0 1173.2 8.38e-008 8.30e-008 8.30e-008 8.30e-008 8.26e-008 8.26e-008 8.26e-008 8.04e-008 8.04e-008 8.04e-008 7.84e-008 7.84e-008 8.35e-008 8.27e-008 8.26e-008 8.26e"008* 8.23e-008 8.22e-008 8.22e-008 8.01e-008 *8.01e~008 .8.01e"008 7,82e-008 7.81e-008 8.39e-008 8.31e-008 8.30e-008 8.30e-008 8.26e-008 8.26e-008 8.26.e-008 8.04e-008 8.04e-008 8.04e-008 7.84e-008 7;84e-008 9.31e-008 9.24e-008 9.23e-008 9.23e-008 9.20e-008 9.20e-008 9.20e-008 9.03e-008 9.03e-008 9.03e-008 8;92e~008 8.92e-008 3.44e-007* 3.41e-007 3.41e-007 3.41El-007 3.40e-007 3.39e-007 3.39e-007 3.31e-007 3.31e-Q07 3.31e-007 3.24e-007 3.24e-007' 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+oOO 6.00e+OOO 6~00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+OOO 6.00e+oOO 6.00e+OOO 4.00e+oOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECC files C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-SMSIMPLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:IGENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Sltu\Slll,1PLE_BOX\

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Sltu\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_Liner_SOIL_SUM_12 Calio Date 11 /18/14

-I

[lJ 0

.J,..

0

~

Multi-Efficienc NiultiEfficiency Report/Style2 II Printing: Tuesday, November 18; 2014, 02:28:01 .2

Primary Efficiency_!aken from ECC files, for set energies ~:

1174.0! 1273.ol 1274.4' 1275'0: 1331.ol 1332.Si 1334.ol 1406.0i 1407.91 1409.0i 1460.8 7.83e-008 7.79e-Q08 7.79e-008 7.79e-008 7.768-008 7.75e-008 7.75e-008 7.66e-008 7.66e-008 7.66e-008 7.59e-008 7.81e-008 7.77e-008 7.76e-008 7.76e-008 7.73e-008 7.73e-008 7.73e~008 7.63e-008 7.63e-008 7.64e-008 7.57e-008 7.83e-008 7.79e-008 7.79e-008 7.79e-008 7.76e-008 7.76e-008 7.75e-008 7.66e-008 7.66e-008 7.66e-008 7.59e-008 a.91e-ooa* 8.87e-008 8.87e-008 8.87e-008 8.83e-008 8:84e-008 8.84e-008 8.79e-008 8.78e-008 8.78e-008 8.75e-008 3.24e-007 3.22e-007 3.22e-007 3.22e-007 3.21e-007 3.21e-007 3.21e-007 3.17e-007 3.17e-007 3.17e-007 3.15e-007 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO 4.00e+OOO Information for input ECG files C:\G ENI E2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln"Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\G ENI E2K\isocs)data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\G ENI E2K\is ocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln-Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

C:\G ENIE2K\isocs\data\G EOMETRY\ln"Situ\SIMPLE_BOX\

Information for saved file with multiefficiency data:

MHF_liner_SOIL_SUM_12 Galib Date 11/18/14

-I lll

);'.

0

~

A

~AN BERRA Multi-Efficiencv Report

-u Dl cc C1l (0

CXl 0

~

0

~

MultiEfficiency Report/Style2 //Printing: Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 02:28:01 3

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\Multiefficiency\MHF Lj ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 11/18/14 02:28:30 -

Genie Cal File: C:\GENIE2K\CALFILES\HMF Liner Soil SUM Dl2.CAL Gertie Cal Time: 11/18/14 03:00:09 - - -

Template: (SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+(SIMPLE BOX)+

Geom

Description:

MHF Liner SUM 12 - - -

Comment: ISOCS: Calib Date 11/18/14 Detector: (3994)+(3996)+(3997)+(3998)+

Cbllimator: (GARDIAN G1)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+(GARDIAN Gl)+

Convergence~ 1.00 % - - - -

Atea [Sq Meters]: 1.0000e-004 (C)

Mass [Grams]: 1.0000e+OOO (C)

Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value c<alculated by ISOCS-(U) = Value modified by u~er Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final Jt of Voxels 58.00 7.40609e-012 10. 0 0.1164200 64000 59.54 1. 65871e-011 10.0 0 .1164200 64000 61.00 3.29606e~Oll 10.0 0.1164200 64000 311. 00 3.83466e-007 10.0 0 .1164200 64000 311. 98 3.83306e-007 10.0 0 .1164200 64000 313.00 3.83341e-007 10.0 0.1164200 64000 343.00 3. 81148e-007 B.o 0 .1164200 64000 344.27 3.80943e-007 8 . ci 0 .1164200 64000 345.00 3.80989e-007 8.0 0. 1164200 64000 660.00 3.44718e-007 6.0 0.1164200 64000 661. 65 3.44222e-007 6.0 0 .1164200 64000 663.00 3.44270e-007 6.0 0 .1164200 64000 701.00 3. 41192e-007 6.0 0 .1164200 64000 702.63 3.40893e-007 6.Q 0 .1164200 64000 703.00 3.40949e-007 6.0 0. 1164200 64000 722.00 3.39562e-007 6.0 0 .1164200 64000 723. 00 3.39434e-007 6.0 0.1164200 64000 724.00 3.39413e-007 6.0 0 .1164200 64000 870.00 3.31239e-007 6.0 0 .1164'200 64000 871.10 3.31111e-007 6.0 0. 1164200 64000 872.00 3.3i213e-007 6.b 0 .1164200 64000 1172. 00 3.24153e-007 4.0 0. 116420"0 64000 1173.2.2 3.24010e-007 4.0 0. 1164200 64000 1174.00 3.23884e-007 4.0 0. 1164200 64000 1273.00 3.22206e-007 4.0 0 .1164200 64000 1274.45 '.3.22131e-007- 4.0 0.1164200 64000 1275.00 3. 22118e-007 4.0 0 .1164200 64000 1331. 00 3.20800e-007 4. 0 0 .1164200 64000 1332.49 3.20779e-007 4.0 0. 1164200 64000 1334. 00 3.20629e-007 4.0 0.1164200 64000 1406.00 3.17373e-007 4.0 0. 1164200 64000 1407.95 3.17314e-007 4.0 0 .1164~0_0 64000 1409;00 3.17358e-007 4. 0 0. i164200 64000 1460.80 3.14948e-007 4.0 0.1164200 64000 TBD-401 Page 99of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Callbrat.lon Curve j El *Measured - - Calculated j 4e-007 3.5e-007 3e-007

' -......_ I 11 11r-t -+-++-++ *--- --

2.5e-007 2e-007 1.5e-007 1e-007 5e-008 I

0 --

)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Energy (keV)

Dalasource: DET02 TBD-401 Page 100of101

Attachment 10.4 MicroShield Modeling Results Interpolated Efficiency Callbratlon Curve I d Meas\lred - - Calculaled I 1e-006 ,___

- OmB I_

1e~007 I

- v 1e-008 I

I I

1e-009 I

I I

1e-010 J I

• -+-

I 1e-011 1e-012 *'

10 100 1000 10000 Energy (keV)

Datasource: DET02 _/

TBD-401 Page 101 of 101

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O Technical Basis for Design, Calibration, and Operation of the Gardian Mobile Assay System Revision O Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay

, Power Plant, Revision 0 TBD-401 Page 1 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O

~

ENERGYSOLUTIONS PRE-OPERATIONAL VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION TESTING OF GARDIAN-1 SYSTEM HPGE DETECTORS FOR USE AT HUMBOLDT BAY POWER PLANT Revision 0 Prepared By:

~d~ n, Jeff Die~ Energ)'Sol11tio11s, LP&D itJ/23 /fif_

Date GARDIAN System SME, CHP Reviewed By: c"j~(h, (k') -~

_ ( u ~b

-;-A::~

Glenn Centola, EnergySo/11/io11s, PP&T

<>.- lb ti~~

Dnte 1\'--l GARDJAN Operalions Mnnagcr Reviewed By; dln ~CU/w~ //- 4-11_

Dee Anderson, Bartlett Services, Inc. Date Counting Room Supervisor

l

'.'.:~ 1 _-k- ~"'~"/ d__. ff,K:- ,B.lLLQAf.'.l_.--;y 4v) 1 Approved By:

J/_

Bill aney, P &E ba?c; 1 FSS Manager Approved By: CJ21,,J ;,(~!-<Fl Dnvc Gilson, CB&I Ii [ 11 /it{

I Date' Waste Manager TBD-401 Page 2 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 1.0 Introduction EnergySolutions' GARD IAN-I mobile waste assay system includes four (4) Canberra

!SOCS (In-Sit11 Object Counting System) characterized detectors. ISOCS technology allows large containers/volumes of waste to be accurately modeled for proper efficiency correction of measurement results. An important component of the ISOCS based calibration is the characterization file used with each container/geometry model. The model and applicable detector characterization file allow the detector's efficiency response to be determined for each co:ntainer/geometry. Validatio1i & Verification (V&V) of each detector's characterization file as part of pre-operational testing of the system is therefore an important part_ofthe system's quality control.

To V&V each ofGARDIAN-I's HPGe (high purity germanium) detectors and ensure the system is ready for use at the Humboldt Bay Power Plant (HBPP), testing was performed of each detector using a NIST traceable multi-energy source. The source modeled for testing using ISOCS calibration software included the radionuclide Eu-152, which has several key gamma energy lines across the energy spectrum of interest at HBPP (i.e., 100 to 2000 keV). Each detector MCA was configured with a 4 channel per keV conversion gain using channels 400 to 8,000 to span the energy range.

After verification of each detectors ISOCS 'characterization file (including evaluation of current dead layer thickness which can grow for p-type HPGe detectors like those used witli GARDIAN-1), base line measurements were collected with each detector and its associated check source (i.e., a source originally containing 1 µCi each ofEu-155 and Na-22). The low and high energy range of the source (i.e., 86.5 keV and 1274.5 keV) were specifically measured to establish a reference point for future response testing to confirm detector responses rem!lin consistent throughout system operation.

The following sections describe the testing configuration and present V&V test results.

The attachments at the end of the report provide detailed information on the ISOCS models, assay reports and spreadsheet evaluations ofresults.

2.0 V&V Test Configuration 2; 1 Test Source A NIST traceable source containing Eu-1~2 was-used to perform the V&V tests of the GARDIAN-lHPGe detectors. The source (EnergySo/utions ID number 099803) is a point source sealed in a thin layer of epoxy forming a 3/8" diameter spot in the bottom ofa l" dianieterplastic vial. Seven key energies fu>m Eu-152 were specifically evaluated including 122, 244, 344, 779, 964, 1112, and 1408 keV. These energies provide a gOdd representation of the GARDIAN-1 system energy range (I 00 to 2000 keV) as well as the range of energies expected to be encountered in HBPP waste/materials.

TBD-401 Page 3 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 The origiiial source activity of the source included 33.54 µCi +/-5% ofEu-152 (9/21/1998 certificate date), but had decayed to 14.62 µCi at the time ofV&V testing. The higher activity level of the source (relative to typical check sources) provided better counting precision at a distance that avoided coincidence smnmu1g issues and minimized potential error with precise source positioning. A copy of the source certificate for source #099803 is included as Attachment 6.1.

2.2 Measurement Configuration To minimize coincidence summing loses and positioning en-ors, the outside of the source vial was positioned 24 inches from the detector end cap during testing (i .e.,

24.5" from the center of the I' diameter vial). The source (in the bottom of the vial) was positioned in line with the center of the detector as shown by Figure 2- 1 below.

Figure 2-1: Measurement Configuration (detector aligned with point source in bottom of\ial)

The vial (liquid scintillation vial) included a 0.033" wall of light density polyethylene. The Model 8573 ISOCS Calibration Software Technical Reference Manual was used to ensure proper setup of the geometry composer reports for each detector. Copies of the geometry composer reports for each of the four detectors are included in Attachment 6.2.

3.0 V & V .Measurement Results Table 3-1 below presents the individual detector results obtained for each of the key Eu-152 energies and the result for the four-detector system as a whole. Although illdividual detector results are obtained when operating the GARDIAN-I system (to provide an indication of the activity distribution in containers/materials assayed), the primary result is tl1e summed detector response, which effectively is the average activity concentration throughout the container.

The weighted mean activity of Eu-I 52 measured by each of the system detectors, which provides the best quantification of Eu-152 present in the vial, was also evaluated. Table 3-2 below provides the weighted mean activity for each of the detectors and the system's sunmied (i.e., average) response.

TBD-401 Page 4 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O Table 3-1: V&V Test Results for GARDIAN-1 HPGE Detectors Energy Det#l Det #2 Det#3 Det#4 Dct Current  %

(keV) 3994 3996 3997 3998 SUM Activity Difference (uCi) (uCi) (uCI) (uCil (uCi) (uCB 121.8 15.33 15.44 14.91 15.34 15.26 14.62 +4.4%

244.7 14.45 14.23 14.22 15.26 14.54 14.62 -0.1%

344.3 13.69 13.57 13.85 15.70 14.20 14.62 -2.9%

778 .9 14.18 13.23 13.53 15.98 14.23 14.62 -2.7%

964.0 14.26 13.93 13.42 14.80 14.10 14.62 -3.6%

1112.0 14.40 13.23 14.08 15.17 14.22 14.62 -2.7%

1408.0 13.24 13.35 13.90 14.66 13.79 14.62 -5.7%

Detector Eu-152 Reported Eu-152 Source  % Difference Activi Ci Actlvi lCi

1. 1 - 3994 14.15 14.62 -3.2%

1. 2-3996 13.86 14.62 -5 .2%

1. 3 - 3997 14.01 14.62 -4.2%

1. 4 - 3998 15.34 14.62 +4.9%

SUM Average 14.34 14.62 -1.9%

4.0 Base Linc Measurement Results Upon completion ofV&V testing, a base line for the current perfo1mance of each of the system detectors was established using the detector's specific response test source to pro..,ide a reference nlue for future detector evaluations. The standard source provided by Canberra for ISOCS detectors was used for this evaluation by attaching the source to the top end of the detector as shown in Figure 4-1 below. The 1" button source at the end of the source jig is positioned 3.5" from the detector end cap when positioned with the tab against the end cap as shown in the figure below.

Figure 4-1 : Position of Check Source and Detector for Base Line Measurements TBD-401 Page 5 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Three measurements were collected for each detector and its associated check source and the average result for both the 86.5 keV peak (from Eu-155) and the 1274.5 keV peak (from Na-22) is shown in Table 4-1 below.

Table 4-1: Base Line Measurements for GARDIAN-1 HPGe Detectors Detector Source Control 86.5 keV Linc 1274.S kcV Line Test Date Number Activity (cps) Activitv (cps) 080701

1. J -3994 30.94 6.27 10/13/14 (HBS598) 080702

1. 2-3996 28.44 5.81 10/13/14

<HBS599) 080703

1. 3-3997 27.17 6.09 10/13/14 (iIBs6oo) 010702

1. 4-3998 36.00 7.17 '10/10/14 (HBS601)

Quality Control charts have been setup for each detector to monitor the response at both the high and low energy peaks. QC parameters to be monitored include peak centroid for both peaks (to provide validation of the detector energy calibration) and peak activities for both peaks (to pr9vide validation of the detector efficiency calibration).

5.0 Summary/Conclusion V&V testing has been completed for all four HPGe detectors associated with the GARDIAN~I assay system. Activities at several gamma energies in the range expected at HBPP have shown proper response using each detector's associated ISOCS characterization file. Ali gamma energies tested were within 10% of the certified source activity for all fqur det~ctors and the summed detector response (i.e., indication of the overall system result} was within 6% of source certified activity for each energy and within 2% of the weighted mean activity for Eu-152.

Base line measurements have been collected for the system's detectors to 11llow future eyaluatl.ons of detector responses. Quality Control charts have been setup to allow future response testing and comparison to acceptance criteiia. The systen1's HPGe detectors are ready for operation.

6.0 Attachments 6.1 V&V Source Certificate 6.2 ISOCS Geometry Composer Reports 6.3 V&V Measurement Assay Reports 6.4 Detector V&V Measurement Results 6.5 Detector Base Line Measurement Results TBD-401 Page 6 of 45

/

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O J

ATTACHMENT 6.1 V & V Source Certificate (2 pages including thls cover sheet)

TBD-401 Page 7 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O 1380 Seaboard Jndustrfal Blvd.

ANAJLYTICS Atlanta, Georgia 30318 *U.S.A.

Pnone (4114) 352-8677 Fa;: (404) 352-2837 CER'fIFJ1CATJE OF CALIBRATION Standard Radionuclide Source 56436-466 Point Source in Liquid Scintillation Vial

'l'bis standard radionuclide source was prepared using aliquots measured qravimetrically from mastef: radionuclide solution sources. The Am-241 was calibrated by 4 pi alpha liquid scintillation counting. The Eu-152 was calibrated in an ion Chamber that *was calibrated by the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, U.K., and is directly traceable to national standards. ~Y'l'ICS maintains traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology through Measurements Assurance Programs as described in USNRC Reg.

Guide 4.15, Revision 1.

lladionuclide purity and calibration were checked using a germaniwn gamma spectrometer system. The nuclear decay rate and assay date for this source are qiven below.

CALIBRATIO~ DATE1 September 21, 1998 12:00 EST rSOTOPEr Am-241 Bu-152 ACTIVITY (dpa): 4.975 E+OS 1.241 B+06 HALF-LIFE1 432,2 y 13.4 y TOTAL UNCBllTAINTY: 5.0% 5.0%

SYSTEMATIC: 4. 7111 4.7~

RANDOMs 0.3% 0.3%

P 0 NUMBER P00002429, Item 2 SOURCE *REPARED BYo ,,,/,~~~

M~e, Radiochernist Q.A APPROVEDz TBD-401 Page 8 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O ATTACHMENT 6.2 ll:SOCS GEOMETRY COMPOSER REPORTS (9 pages including this cover sheet)

TBD-401 Page 9 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 A

CANBERRA Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 - 17:14:26

Description:

Det 3994 V&V Test comment:

• File Name: E:\3994_W.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_CYLINDER, Version: (default)

Detector: 3994 Environment: Temperature ,,; 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%1 MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (Inches)

No. i:>es.cril!tlon d.1* d,5 d,6: r.t.a~tlal Der:isltv Rel;COnc.

1 Container 0.033. 0.375 0.05 lpolyeth 0.92 2 Source - Top Layer 0 <none>

3 Source

• Bottom layer 0.05 epoxy 1.1 1.00 4, Absorber! 0.0;!7559 germanum 5.4 5 Absorber2 none 6 *SourCe-Detector 24.5 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 122.0 244.0 344.0 779.0 964.0 1112.0 1408.0 ISIMPLE (;)UNDER I TBD-401 Page 10 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 A

Geome ry Compose1 Report CA BE RRA Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 - 17:14:26

==

Description:==

Det 3994 V&V Test Comment:

File Name: E: \3994_W .geo SOftware: ISOCS Template: SIMPLE_CYLINDER, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 11 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O A

CANBERRA Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 -17:13:14

==

Description:==

Det 3996 V&V Test Comment:

File Name: E:\3996_W.geo Software: ISOCS Template: SiMPLE_CYUNDER, Version: (default)

Detector: 3996 Environment: Temperature =22 °C, Pressure =760 mm Hg; Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN =24 (16), CRPN =24 (16)

Dimensions (Inches)

No; De5ct1ptlon d;l I d;2 r d;3 I d;.J d.5* I d;~ Mat;_e_rill.I .Density Re,l.co.ric:.

1 Container 0.033 I 0.375 I o.os I I lpo!yelh .0.92 I I I 2

3 Source

• Top Layer Source - Bottom Layer 0

0.05 I I

II I I I

<none>

epoxy 1.1 1.00 4

5 6

Absorber!

Absorber2 Source-Detector 0.031496 24.5 I

I 0 I

I 0 II 0 D I

I germanum none 5.4 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 122.0 244.0 344.0 779.0 964.0 1112.0 1408.0 ISIMPLE C'.UHDER I TBD-401 Page 12 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O eometry C 1nposer Report A

CAN BE RRA Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 - 17:13:14

==

Description:==

Det 3996 V&V Test Comment:

File Name: E:\3996_W .geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_CYLINDER, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 13 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 A

Geom .tr v Composer R port CA N BER A Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 - 17:14:02

==

Description:==

Det 3997 V&V Test Comment:

File Name: E:\3997_W .geo software: ISOCS Template: SIMPLE_CYLINDER, Version: (default)

Detector: 3997 Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 {16)

Dimensions (Inches)

No. Desmptl on d.1 d.2 I d.3 I d.4 I d.S I d.6 Material Density Rel. Cone.

1 Container 0.033 0.375 I 0.05 I I I lpolyeth 0.92 2 Source - Top layer 0 I I I I <none>

3 Source - Bottom layer 0.05 I I I I epoxy 1.1 1.00

• 1 I I 4

5 6

Absorber!

Absort>er2 Source-Detector 0.035433 24.5 0 I

I 0 I

I 0 I

I 0 I

I germanum none 5.4 I

List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 122.0 244.0 344.0 779.0 964.0 1112.0 1408.0 IS1W'l.E c .u 110ER I Y+, _,,, .,..

k .. -z TBD-401 Page 14 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Va lidation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O Geownetry omposer Report CA N ERRA Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 - 17:14:02

==

Description:==

Det 3997 V&V Test Comment:

Fiie Name: E:\3997_W.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_CYUNDER, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 15 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN- 1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O A

eomet y Composer eport CA A Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 - 10:37:55

==

Description:==

Det 3998 V&V Test Comment:

File Name: E:\3998_W.geo software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_CYLINDER, Version: (default)

Detector: 3998 Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (Inches)

No. Description d.1 d.2 I d.3 d .4 I d.5 r d.6 Material Derulty Rel. Cone.

1 Container 0.033 0.375 I 0.05 I I lpolyelh 0 .92 2 Source - Top Layer 0 I I I none 3 Source - Bottom Layer 0.05 I I T epoxy 1.1 1.00 4 Absorber! I I I none 5 Absortler2 I I I I none __J 6 Source* Detector 24.5 0 I 0 0 I 0 I List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 122.0 244.0 344.0 779.0 964.0 1112.0 1408.0 l s1t1Pl( CoUllDER I TBD-401 Page 16 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Geometry o*npose

• Report ERRA Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 - 10:37:55

==

Description:==

Det 3998 V&V Test Comment:

File Name: E:\3998_W.geo Software: I SOCS Template: SIMPLE_CYUNDER, Version: (default)

TBD-401 Page 17of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 ATTACHMENT 6.3 V &V MEASUREMENT ASSAY REPORTS (18 pages including this cover sheet)

TBD-401 Page 18 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O

. ***** G A MMA S P E C T R U M A NA L Y S I S *****

Filename: E:\DET01_101314 lST VIAL 600 SEC COUNT.CNF Report Generated On 10/16/2014 4:26:39 PM Sample Title DET 1 Sample Description VIAL 600 SEC Sample Identification SPECT 1 Sample Type Sample Geometry Peak Locate Threshold 3.00 Peak Locate Range (in channels) 1 - 65535 Peak Area Range (in channels) 400 - 8000 Identification Energy Tolerance 1.000 keV Sample Size 1.000E+OOO Unit Sample Taken On Acquisition Started 10/13/2014 10:55:03 AM Live Time 600.0 seconds Real Time 602.5 seconds Dead Time 0.42 ~

Energy Calibration Used Done On 9/16/2014 Efficiency Calibration Used Done On 10/16/2014 Efficie,ncy ID ET 3994 V&V_TEST TBD-401 Page 19 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Peak Analysis Report 10/16/2014 4:26:39 PM Page 2

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~*******************

• • • • • PE AK A NA L Y S I S R E P 0 R T *****

Detector Name: DETOl Sample

Title:

DET 1 Peak Analysis Performed on: 10/16/20_14 4:26:39 PM Peak Analysis -From Channel: 400 Peak Analysis To Channel: 8000 Peak ROI ROI Peak Energy FWH!-1 Net *Peak Net Area Continuum No, start end centroid (keV) (keV) Area Uncert. Counts 1 412- 421 418. 07 104. 5.9 0.30 3.19E+OOO 73.24 2.37E+003 2 480- 495 487.60 122.00 1.02 2.68Et004 199.10 4.29E+003 3 970- 987 978.89 244.98 1.13 4.80E+003 98.82 1.53E+003 4 1098- 1106 1101. 52 275.67 0.68 3.42E+001 34.67 5.47E+002 5 1175- 1190 1183.62 296.22 0.56 1.95E+002 51. 93 8.30E+002 6 1367- 1386 1376.90 344.58 1.16 l.12E+004 124.07 1.21E+003 7 1461- 1480 1470.89 368 .. 10 1. 24 4.19E+002 47.58 5.27E+002 8 1637- 1653 1643.96 411. 41 1. 07 7.lOE.f.002 47.50 4.93E+002 9 1692- 1701 1696.79 424.62 0.58 -G.82E+OOO 23.87 2.56E+002 10 1767- 1785 1775.49 444.31 1. 34 1.02E+003 51. 74 4.91E+002 11 1924- 1936 1929.01 482.72 0.60 2.75E+001 28.82 3.02E+002 12 2249- 2259 2254.66 564.17 0.99 4.59E+001 28.58 3.20E+002 13 2335- 2353 2345.28 586.84 b.39 1.14E+002 38.13 3.9.6E+002 14 2704- 2721 2713.61 678.95 1.35 l.49E+002 32.31 2.75E+002 15 2748- 2766 2754.67 689.21 1.04 1.43E+002 35. 40 3.28E+002 16 2974- 2987 2979.67 745.41 0.25 -1.39E+001 25.76 2.46E+002 17 3102- 3127 3115. 01 779. 30 1. 57 2.41E+003 66.18 4.65E+002 18 3236- 3247 3241.55 810.94 1.16 3.38E+001 22.52 1.85E+002 19 3456- 3482 34.69. 37 867. 88 1. 62 6.60E+002 50.99 4.43E+002 20 3842- 3869 3856.:::2 964.56 1. 68 2. 25E+00_3 59.35 2.84E+002 21 4012- 4030 4020.48 10Q5.60 1.27 1.04E+002 22.25 1.13E+002 M 22 4329- 4370 4343.72 1086.36 1. 81 1.34E+003 38.35 1-. 36E+002 m 23 4329- 4370 4359.68 1090.35 1. 81 2.34E+002 18.04 1. 33E+002 24 4434- 4462 4448.67 111-2. 58 1. 54 1.84E+003 53.31 2 .17E+002 25 4842--, 4863 4851.69 1213.24 1. 66 1.83E+002 23.21 9. 41E+001 26 4995- 5008 5000.97 1250.52 0.25 2. 29E+otn 11.82 4.llE+OOl 27 5187- 5209 5197.24 1299.53 1.25 1. 60E+002 18. 75 4.91E+001 28 5619- 5648 5633.47 1408.44 1. 77 2.12E+003 50.80 9.75E+001 M 29 5823- 5853 5831.04 1457.7.6 1. 83 4.87E+001 7.55 5.00E+OOO m 30 5823- 5853 5844.43 1461.10 1. 83 1.04E+002 10.62 5.25E+OOO M = First peak in a multiplet region m = Other peak in a multiplet region F = Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1. 000 sigma TBD-401 Page 20 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:26:40 PM Page 3

• • • • • NUCLIDE I DE N T I F I C A T I 0 N R E P 0 R T *****

Sample

Title:

DET 1 Nuclide Library Used: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILES\Eu152.NLB

• t e *I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IDENTIFIED N9CLIDES I I I I I It I I I I 1 t I I I I I I I Nuclide- Id Energy Yield. Activity Activity Name Confidence (keV) (%) (uCi/Unit) Uncertainty EU-152 0.974 121. 78* 28.40 1.53284E+001 4.23369E-001 244.69* 7.49 1. 44549E+001 4. 52689E-001-344.27* 26.50 l.36930E+001 2. 90951E-001 778.89* 12.74 1.41788E+001 4.99683E-001 964.01* 14.40 1.42625E+001 S.00773E-001 1112.02* 13.30 1. 43965E+001 S.48277E-001 1407.95* 20.70 l.32445E+001 4.69961E-001

• : Energy line found in the spectrum.

@ = Energy line not used for Weighted Mean Activity Energy Tolerance : 1.000 keV Nuclide confidence index threshold 0.30 Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma TBD-401 Page 21 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay

• Power Plant, Revision O Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:26:40 PM Page 4

• • • • • I N T E R F E R E NC E C 0 R R E C T E D R E P 0 R T *****

Nuclide Wt mean Wt mean Nuclide Id Activity Activity Name Gonf idence (uCi/Unit) Unqertainty.

EU-152 0.974 1.414865E+OD1 1.619683E-001

? nuclide is part of an undetermined soiution X nuclide rejected by the interference analysis

@ nuclide contains energy lines not used in Weighted Mean Activity Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma

\

TBD-401 Page 22 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:26:40 PM Page 5

• • • • • • • • • • U N I DE N T I F I E D p E AK S **********

Peak Locate Performed on: 10/16/2014 4:26:39 PM Peak Locate Frc;>m Channel: 400 Peak Locate To Channel: 8000 Peak Energy Peak Size i11 Peak CPS Peak Tol.

No. (keV) Counts per Second  % Uncertainty Type Nuclide 1 104.59 5,3202E-003 2294. 43 4 275.67 5.6954E-002 101. 45 5 296.22 3.2461,E-001 26.66 7 368.10 6.9873E-001 11.35 8 411. 41 1.1826E+OOO 6.69 9 424.62 -l.1372E-002 -349.88 10 444.31 l.6938E+OOO 5.09 11 482. 72 4.5751E-002 105.00 12 564.17 7.656QE-002 62.22 13 586;84 1.9022E-001 33.41 14 678.95 2.4818E-001 21. 70 15 689.21 2. 3911E-001 24.67 Sum 16 745.47 -2.3238E-002 -184.77 18 810.94 5.6309E-002 66.65 19 867. 88 1.1006E+OOO 7. 72 21 1905.60 1. 735gE-001 21.36 M 22 1086.36 2.2396E+OOO 2.85 Sum m 23 1090.35 3.9030E-001 7.71 25 1213.24 3.0487E-001 12.. 69 26 1250.52 3.8216E-002 51.54 27 1299.53 2.6652E-001 11. 72 M 29 1457.76 8 .1180E-002 15.50 Sum m 30 1461.10 l.7336E-001 10.21 M First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma TBD-401 Page 23 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O

• • • • • G A MMA S P E C T R UM ANA L YS I S *****

Filename: E:\DET02_101314_2ND VIAL 600 SEC COUNT.CNF Report Generated On 10/16/2014 4:27:56 PM Sample Title DET02 Sample Description VIAL 101314 @ 24" Sample Identification SPEC 2 Sample Type Sample Geometry Peak Locate Threshold 3.00 Peak Locate Range (in channels) 1 - ,65535 Peak Area Range (in channels) 400 - 8000 Identification Energy Tolerance 1. 000 keV Sample Size 1. OOOE+OOO Unit Sample Taken On Acquisition Started 10/13/2014 3:10:17 PM Live Time 600. 0 second.s Real Time 602.3 seconds Dead Time 0.39 ~

Energy Calibration Used Done On 9/16/2014 Efficiency Calibration Used Done On 10/16/2014 Ef £:iciency ID ET 399.6 V&V_TEST TBD-401 Page 24 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Peak Analysis Report 10/16/2014 4:27:56 PM Page 2

• • • • • P E A K A N A L Y S I S REPORT *****

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~************************************

Detector Name: DET02 Sample

Title:

DET02 Peak Analysis Performed qil: 10/16/2014 4:27:56 PM.

Peak Analysis From Channel: 400 Peak Analysis To Channel: 8000 Peak ROI RQI Peak Energy Fl'lHM Net Peak Net Area. Continuum No. start end centroid (keV) (keV) Area Uncert. Counts 1 479- 495 487. 71 121. 84 0.91 2.65E+004 198.58 4.15E+003 2 970- 988 979.31 244.85 0.99 4.69E+003 99.39 1.54E+003 3 1179- 1189 1183. 94 296.05 1.28 3.04E+002 38.86 5.06E+002 4 1367- 1387 1377.53 344.49 1.13 1.10E+004 12.4. 24 1.22E+003 5 1464- 1479 1471. 62 368.03 1.16 2.91E+002 41. 54' 4.78E+002 M 6 1637- 1670 1644.80 411. 35' 1.24 7.89E+002 31.87 4.10E+002 m 7 1637- 1670 1664.92 416.38 1.24 6.75E+001 16.90 4.02E+002 8 1768- 1786 1776.16 444.21 1. 24 9.89E+002 51.17 4.81E+002 9 2247- 2267 2256.23 564.30 1. 49 1.45E+002 41. 88 4.44E+002 10 2340- 2352 2345.52 586.63 0.47 1.03E+002 29.21 2.84E+002 11 2708- 2725 2714. 56 678.93 1. 55 l ..39E+002 32.73 2.84E+002 12 2745- 2764 2754.84 689.00 1.39 1. 73E+002 3.5.89 3.18E+002 13 2866- 2885 2879.20 720.10 1. 01 8.16E+001 33.73 3.00E+002 14 3054- 3066 3059.88 765.29 0.73 4.17E+001 23.89 2.00E+002 15 3105- 3128 3115. 94 779.30 1.50 2.24E+003 62.00 4.01E+002 16 3458- 3482 3469.98 867.83 1. 73 6.84E+002 46.89 3.66E+002 17 3669- 3685 3677.08 919.61 0.38 8.57E+001 23.08 l.41E+002 18 3845- 3870 3856.92 964.58 1. 48 2.19E+003 57.34 2.60E+002 19 4013- 4029 4021. 45 1005. 71 1.31 5.85E+001 20.57 1.16E+002 M 20 4331- 4370 43.44.18 1086.39 1. 79 1.36E+003 37.25 2 .14E+002 m 21 4331- 4370 4359.49 1090.22 1. 79 2.41E+002 17.61 1.73E+002 22 4434- 4463 4449.23 1112. 65 1. 57 l.68E+003 52. 97 2.36E+002 23 4846- 4861 4852.75 1213.51 2.15 1.14E+002 20. 46 1.00E+002 24 5185- 5207 5197.58 1299.70 1. 60 1.74E+002 18.11 3.98E+001 25 5619- 5649 5633.53 1408.65 1. 66 2.13E+003 50.33 8.39E+001 M 26 5824- 5854 5833.15 1458.53 1. 77 5.34E+001 7.78 5.00E+OOO m 27 5824- 5854 5845.15 1461.53 1. 77 7.69E+001 8.98 5.75E+OOO M First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region

-F Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1. 000 sigma TBD-401 Page 25 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operation_!31 Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:27:56 PM Page 3

• • • • • NUCLIDE I DE NT I F I C A T I 0 N R E P 0 R T ****'!<

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~*********************

Sample

Title:

DET02 Nuclide Library Used: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILES\Eul52.NLB t' ***** ' t. **I I* I I IDENTIFIED NUCLIDES 0 *It t t °'ta a I* t I I I I 1 I I Nuclide I<;! Energy Yi~ld Activity Activity Name Confidence (keV) (%} (uCi/Uriit) Uncertainty EU-152 0.970 121. 78* 28.40 1.54352E+001 4.26594E-001 244.69* 7.49 1.42339E+001 4.51163E-001 344.27* 26.50 1. 35700!H001 2.89565E-001 778.89* 12.74 l.32251E+001 4.68338E-001 964.01* 14. 40 1.39266E+001 4.86895E-001 1112. 02* 13.30 1.32294E+001 5.28954E-001 1407.95* 20.70 1.33470E+001 4.70520E-001

• = Energy line found in the spectrum.

@ = Energ~; line not used for Weighted Mean Activity Energy Tolerance : 1.000 keV Nuclide confidence index threshold 0.30 Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma TBD-401 Page 26 of 45 L__

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:27:56 PM Page 4

• • • • • • • • • ~*~**************************************~**********************

"***** I N T E R F E R E NC E C b R R E C T E D R E P 0 R T *****

• • • • • • • • i*****************************************i**********************

Nuclide Wt mean Wt mean Nuclide Id Activity Activity Name Confidence (uCi/Unit) Uncertainty EU-152 0.970 1.385616E+001 l.597139E-001

? nuclide is part of an undetermined solution X nuclide rejected by the interference *analysis

@ nuclide contains energy lines not used in Weighted Mean Activity

~rrors quoted at 1.000 sigma

• • • • • • • • • -1.* U N I DE N T I F I E D P E A K S **********

Peak Locate Performed on: 10/16/2014 4:27:56 PM Peak Locate From Channel: 400 Peak Locate To Channel: 8000 Peak Energy Peak Size in Peak CPS Peak Tol.

No. (keV) Counts per Second  % Uncertainty Type Nuclide 3 296.05 5.0746E-001 12.76 5 36.8. 03 4.8530E-OO:j. 14.26 M 6 411.35 1. 3145E+OOO 4.04 m 7 416.38 1.1245E-00l 25.05 8 444.21 1.6491E+OOO 5.17 9 564.30 2.4225E-001 28.81 10 586.63 1.7'089E-001 28.49 11 678. 93 2.3133E-001 23.58.

i2 689.00 2.8893E-001 20.70 Sum 13 720.10 1.3606E-001 41. 32 14 765.29 6.9496E-002 57.30 16 867.83 1.1394E+OOO 6.86 17 .919.61 l.4278E-001 26.94 19 1005.71 9.7543E-002 35.14 M 20 1086.39 2.266iE+cioo 2;74 Sum m 21 1090. 22 4.0248E-001 7.29 23 1213.51 l.8922E-001 18.02 24 1299.70 2.9028E-001 10.40 M 26 1458.53 8.9070E-002 14.55 m 27 1461. 53 1.2822E-001 11. 67 M-~-- First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F = Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1. 000 sigma TBD-401 Page 27 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0

• • • • • G A M M A SPECTRUM ANA L YS I S *****

Filename: E:\DET03_101314_1ST VIAL 600 SEC COUNT.CNF Report Generated On 10/16/2014 4:28:34 PM /

Sample Title DET 3 Sample Description VIAL @24" 600 SEC Sample Identification SPECT 1 Sample Type Sample Geometry Peak Locate Threshold 3.00 Peak Locate Range (in channels) 1 - 65535 Peak Area Range (in channels) 400 - 8000 Identification Energy Tolerance 1: 000 keV Sample Size  : 1.000E+OOO Unit Sampie Taken On Acquisition Started 10/13/2014 4:17:21 PM Live Time 600.0 seconds Rea.l Time 602.4 seconds Dead Time 0.40 56 Energy Calibration Used Done On 9/16/2014 Efficienc:",' Calibration Used Done On 10/16/2014 Efficiency ID ET 3997 V&V TEST TBD-401 Page 28 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O Peak Analysis Report 10/16/2014 4:28:34 PM Page 2

• • • • • P E A K A N A L YS I S REPORT *****

Detector Name: DETOl Sample

Title:

DET 3 Peak Analysis Performed on: 10/16/2014 4:20:34 PM Peak Analysi~ From Channel: 400 Peak Analysis To Channel: 8000 Peak ROI ROI Peak Energy FvmM. Net Peak Net Area Continuum No. start end, centroid

\

(keV) (keV) Area Uncert. Counts 1 479- 494 487.01 121.85 0. 92 2.51E+004 193.08 4.06E+Ci03 2 972- 987 978.25 244.82 1. 05 4.66E+003 94.11 1.39E+003 3 1175- 1189 1183.04 296.07 0. 65 2.21E+002 49. 25 7.65E+002 4 1366- 1385 1376.22 344.41 1.11 1.12E+004 124.88 1. 26E+003 5 1463- 1476 1470.10 367.91 1. 07 2.93E+002 38.60 4.33E+002 6 1635- 1653 1643.41 411.27 1.27 7.93E+002 49.83 5.01E+002 7 1764- 1785 1774.63 444.10 1.26 9:59E+002 56. 03 5.81E+002 8 1949- 1959 1953.53 488.85 1. 06 8*. 66E+001 26. 93

• 2. G7E+002 9 2339- 2350 2344.16 506.56 0.67 9.12E+001 28.10 2.78E+002 10 2706- 2721 2711. 60 670.44 1. 09 1.31E+002 30.05 2.54E+002 11 2743- 2761 2753.83 689.00 l.l4 1.55E+002 35.52 3.28E+002 12 2870- 2884 2876.00 719.55 0.78 9.lOE+OOl 28.51 2.50E+002 13 3102- 3127 3114.67 779. 22 1. 63 2.28E+003 67.34 5.30~+002 14 3458- 3478 34.60.76 867.73 1. 50 6.20E+002 44.29 3.70E+002

15. 3844- 386!:) 3855.82 9.64. 46 1. 67 2.10E+003 57.64 2.86E+002 16 4012- 4028 4020.08 1005.50 0.80 9.13E+001 21.21 1.15E+002 M 17 4329- 4368 4343.45 1086.29 1. 93 l.36E+003 38.94 l.67E+002 m 18 4329- 4368 4358. 71 1090.10 1. 93 2.52E+002 19. 40 1.64E+002 19 4434- 4462 4448.33 1112. 49 1. Bl 1. 79E+003 54.12 2.47E+002 20 4841- 4862 4852.75 1213.50 1. 82 1.70E+002 23.69 l.05E+002 21 5188- 5207 5198.00 1299.72 1. 95 1.62E+002 17.16 3.76E+001 22 5619- 5648 5633.34 1408.41 1. 78 2.21E+003 51.13 8.37E+001 23 5839- 5855 5845.56 14 61. 38 1.10 7.62E+001 14 .56 3 .. S8E+001 M First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F"' Fitted singlet Errors q\,1.oted at 1.000 sigma TBD-401 Page 29 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:28:34 PM Page 3

• • • • • N UC L I DE I DE NT I F I C A T I 0 N R E P 0 R T *****

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i*********************

Sample

Title:

DET 3 Nuclide Library Used: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILES\Eul52.NLB IDENTIFIED NUCLIDE$

Nuclide Id Energy Yield Activity Activity Name Confidence {keV) (%) (uCi/Unit) Uncertainty EU-152 0.984 121.78* 28. 40 1.49051E+001 4.12708E-001 244.69* 7.49 1.42189E+001 4.41600E-001 344.27* 26.50 l.38544E+001 2.94762E-001 778. 89* 12.74 1.35308E+001 4.98531E-001 964.01* 14.40 l.34l89E+OOi 4.81521E-001 1112.02* 13.30 1.40822E+001 5.50084E-001 1407.95* 20.70 1. 390) 7E+001 4.85202E-001

• = Energy line found in the spectrum.

@ = Energy line not used for Weighted Mean Acti v*i ty Energy Tolerance : 1. 0_00 keV Nuclide confidence index threshold 0.30 Errors quoted at *1.o'oo sigma TBD-401 Page 30 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:28:34 PM Page 4

• '* **"* ** * * ** * ** * ** ** ** ** **** * ** ** ** * * ** * * ** * ** ** ** * ** * *** * ** ** * * ** * **"Y * * **

• • • • • I N T E R- F E R E N C E C 0 R R E C T E D R E P 0 R T ******

• • • • • ~*******************************************************************

Nuclide Wt: mea.n Wt mean Nuclide Id Activity Activity Name Confidence (uCi/Unit) Uncertainty EU-152 0.984 1.400573E+001 1.613797E-001

? nuclide is part of an µndetermined solution X nuclide rejected by the interference analysis

@ nuclide contains energy lines not used in Weighted Mean Activity Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma

• • • • • • • • • • U N I DE NT I F I E D P E A K S **********

Peak Locate Performed on: 10/16/2014 4:28~34 PM Peak Locate From Channel: 400 Peak Locate To Channel: 8000 Peak Energy Peak Size in Peak CPS Peak Tol.

No. (keV) Counts per Second  % Uncertainty Type Nuclide 3 296.07 3. 6771E-00l, 22.32 5 367.91 4.8751E-001 13.20 6 411. 27 1.3217E+OOO 6.28 7 444.10 1.5988E+OOO 5.84 8 488.85 l.4438E-001 31.09 Sum 9 586:56 1.5204E-001 30.81 10 678.44 2.1841E-001 22.93 11 689!00 2.5870E-001 22.88 sum 12 719.55 1.5171E-001 31.33 14 867.73 1.0333E+OOO 7.14 16 1005.50 1.5208E-001 23.24 Ji.! 17 1086.29 2.2736E+OOO 2. 85 Sum m 18 1090.10 4.2077E-001 7.68 20 1213.50 2.8250E-001 13.98 21 1299.72 2.7063E-001 10.57 23 '1461. 38 1.2703E-001 19.10 M First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1. 000 sigma TBD-401 Page 31 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~*********

• • • • • GAMM A S P E C T R U'M A NA L Y S I S *****

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~******~****************

Filename: E:\100914_1ST 600 COUNT.CNF Report Generated On 10/16/2014 4:25:49 PM Sample Title DET 4 Sample Description AM - EU MULTI LINE @24" Sample Identification SPECT 1 Sample Type Sample Geometry Peak Locate Threshold 3.00 Peak Locate Range (in channe~s)

• 1 - 65535 Peak Area Range (in channels) 400 - 8000 Identification Energy Tolerance 1.000 keV Sample Size 1. OOOE+OOO Unit Sample Taken On Acquisition Started 10/9/2014 10:58:38 AM Live Time 600.0 seconds Real Time 602.9 seconds Dead Time 0.48 %

Energy Calibration Used Done On 9/16/2014 Efficiency Calibration Used Done On 10/16/2014 Efficiency ID ET_3.998_V&V_TEST TBD-401 Page 32 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O Peak Analysis Report 10/16/2014 4:25:50 PM Page 2

• • • • • P E A K A NA L YS I S R E P 0 R T *****

Detector Name: DETOl Sampie

Title:

• DET 4 Peak Analysis Performed on:. 10/16/2014 4:25:50 PM Peak Analysis From Channel: 400 Peak Analysis To Channel: 8000 Peak ROI ROI Peak Energy FWHM Net Peak Net Area Continuum No. start end centroid (keV) (keV) Area Uncert. Counts 1 479- 494 486.80 121. 80 0.88 3.07E+004 212. 68 4.85E+003

2. 908- 916 912.12 228.27 0.68 2.09E+001 42.55 8.35E+002 3 970- 986 977. 97 244.75 1. 02 5.28E+003 103.47 1.73E+003 4 1173- 1189 1182.92 296.04 1.05 3.51E+002 58.80 9.94E+002 5 1366- 1385 1375.91 344.34 1.13 L32E+004 137.22 l.61E+003 6 1459- 1478 1469.76 367. 82 1. 01 3 .. 85E+002 55.18 7.60E+002 M 7 1635- 1667 1643.14 411.20 1.17 8.41E+002 35.88 5.03E+002 m 8 1635- 1667 1662.29 415.99 1.17 4.85E+001 18.59 4.36E+002 9 1768- 1784 1774.18 443.98 1. 09 l.09E+003 53.13 5. 45E+002 10 1943- 1962 1953.13 488.75 1.13 2.05E+002 44. 62 5.08E+002 11 2249- 2261 2254.39 564 .11 0.59 1.29E+002 33.91 3.86E+002 12 2338- 2349 2343. 5.4 586.40 0.51 7.28E+001 31.28 3.60E+002 M 13 2692- 2718 2697.64 674.95 1.22 4.68E+001 16.05 2.90E+002 m 14 2692- 2718 2713.38 678 .. 89 1.22 1.12E+002 19.19 2.72E+002 15 2742- 2,757 2152.67 688. 71 1. 42 2.29E+002 33.96 3.08E+002 16 3100- 3125 3113. 40 778.90 1.55 2.85E+003 70.17 4.88E+002 17 3232- 3246 3240.83 810.75 1.29 1.29E+002 27.51 2.17E+002 18 3459- 3480 3467. 63 867. 44 1. 61 8.15E+002 49. 55 4.31E+002 19 3697- 3712 3703.29 926.34 1. 00 8.44E+001 22.04 1. 33E+002 20 3841- 3867 3854.49 964.13 1. 83 2.49E+003 65.62 4 .15E+002-21 4006- 4029 4019.97 1005.47 0.81 1.25E+002 29.51 1. 86E+002 M 22 4329- 4369 4342 .*06 1085.94 1. 84 l.58E+003 42.23 2. 28.E:+002 m 23 4329- 4369 4357.33 1089.76 1. 84 2.89E+002 20. 89 2.19E+002 24 4432- 4460 4446.82 1112 .11 1. 80 2.10E+003 58.87 2.95E+002 25 4842- 4860 4850.72 1213.00 1.02 1.59E+002 24.38 1.29E+002 26 5185- 5207 5195.56 1299.11 1.98 2.16E+002 21. 64 6.41E+001 27 5616- 5646 5631.39 1407.92 1. 88 2.63E+003 57.42 l.36E+002 28 5835- 5852 5843.90 14 60. 97 0.66 8.42E+001 16.47 5.58E+001 29 6106- 6120 6113.17 1528.17 0.56 4.09E+001 6.88 2.06E+OOO M First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F Fitted singlet Errors quoted at 1. 000 sigma TBD-401 Page 33 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 Interference Corrected Activity Report 10/16/2014 4:25:50 PM Page 3

• • • • • • • • • • • • • ~***********************************************************

• • • • • N U C L I _D E I D E N T I F I C A T I 0 _N R E P 0 .R T *****

$af!lp_le

Title:

. DET 4 Nuclide Library Used: C:\GENIE2K\CAMFILES\Eu152.NLB IDENTIFIED NUCLIDES Nuclide Id Energy Yield Activity Activity Name Confidence (keV) (%) (uCi/Unit) Uncertainty EU-152 0.999 121.78* 28.40 1.53425E+001 ~.21735E-001 244.69* 7.49 1.52565E+001 4.67700E-001 344.27* 26.50 1.56955E+001 3. 27724E-0.01 778.89* 12.74 l.59824E+001 5.28048E-001

-964.01* 14.40 1.4B020E+001 5.18535E-001 1112. 02* .13.30 1.51696E+001 5. 65938E-00l 1407.95* 20.70 1. 46645E+001 4.99159E-001

• ~ Energy line found in the spectrum.

@ =- Energ:~: line not used f~r Weighted Mean Activity Energy Tolerance : 1.000 keV Nuclide confidence index threshold 0.30 Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma TBD-401 Page 34 of45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O Interference Corrected~ctivity Report 10/16/2014 4:25:50 PM Page 4

• • • • • I N T E R F E R E N C E C 0 R R E C T E D R E P 0 R T *****

Nuclide Wt mean Wt meari Nuclide Id Activity Activity Name Confidence (uCi/Unit) Uncertainty EU-152 0-.999 1. 534008E+001 1.716352E-001

? nuclide is part of an und!=!termi:ned solution X nuclide rejected by the interference\analysis

@ nuclide contains energy lines not used in Weight~d Mean Activity Errors quoted at 1.000 sigma

• • • • • • • • • • U N I DE NT I F I E D P E A KS ** *********

• Peak Lo.cate Performed on: 10/16/2014 4:25:49 PM Peak Locate From Channel: 400 Peak Locate To Channel: 8000 Peak Energy Peak Size in Peak CPS Peak Tol.

No. (keV) Counts per Second Sj Uncertainty Type Nui:::lide 2 228.27 3. 4888E-.002 203.25 4 296.04 5.B496E-001 16.75 6 367.82 6.4210E-001 14.32 M 7 411..20 1.4015E+OOO 4.27 m 8 415.99 8.0841E-002 38.32 9 443.98 1. 8162E+OOO 4.88 10 488.75 3. 41l8E-001 21.80 Sum 11 564.11 2.1475E-001 26.31 12 586.40 1.2137E-001 42.95 M 13 674.95 7.792BE-002 34 .3.2 m 14 678. 89 1.B637E-001 17.16 15 688.71 3.8202E-001 i4.81 Su.m 17 810.75 2.1441E-001 21. 39 18 867.44 1 . 35 77E+OO 0 6.08 19 926.34 1. 4059E-001 26.13

• 21 1005.47 2.0818E-001 23,152 M 22 i085.94 2.6303E+OOO 2. 6.8 Sum Iil 23 1089.76 4.8167E-001 7.23 25 1213.00 2.6536E-001 15.312 26 1299.11 3.5988E-001 10.02 28 146Q.97 1.4033E-001 19.56 29 1528.17 6.8227E-002 16.81 M First peak in a multiplet region m Other peak in a multiplet region F Fitted singlet TBD-401 Page 35 of 45

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision 0 ATTACHMENT 6.4 DETECTOR V&V MEASUREMENT RESULTS (5 pages including this covel' sheet)

)

TBD-401 Page 36 of 45

l HPGe ISOCS Detector Verification & Validation Testing I Detector Position:

Detector ID Number:

- _- --~ ==-~~-~-=- __:_f__:-__ -

3994 1 . I J_1

--*--i--*-*-*-*-r--**---- *-

source ID Number

- --*~-ci9"9ao:r*-:-----*-**

. -_ . *----------...i..___, _______

Source Certification Date: r.!_/199~__:: _______ . __ ;___ I Detector Dead Layer fil!!!!)__ _ __92-_ ___J__ ________ j_______ I Test Date: . I 10/1312014 I  ; . -

I **-*---*-r-*---*-r--* Decay

! i I Original Corrected Measured Nuclide *-*---~-lj~f.:.~!!_ {_<!_ay~l~ !=n~~El.'lJ~~-- Activity (uCi) Activity~ Activity (uCi) o/o Difference

.,.152

• 094E*03 121.8 ~ 33.54 14.617 15.33 4.88%

Eu-152 ___ ,__ ___j__(~94E!93T~.. ~~:7 - -~~ .... 33.54_ -- 14.617 14.45 -1.14%

~~:~~~ ----*-* . . . ~-- . . .-~J;:~~~-<._. m:~=~:-~- ;;:~!

14.617 13.69 -6.34%

14.617 14.18 -2.99%

Eu-152 ~~g'.!._~+OL~--~~~---+*--*;3-3.54__ 14.617 14.26 -2.44%

-I Eu-152 I 4.894E+03 : 1112.0 *33_54 14.617 14.40 -1.48%

CD 0

Eu-152 ----*14.'8"94E+o3-~---*14o8.0 --T 33.54___ 14.617 13:24 -9.42%

.J,.

0

~

HPGe ISOCS Detector Verification & Validation Testing

-.,.------------r--------=i_--. *~**

I I l---- ~---

Detector Position: -i---~- ---*f--**------*_J_________ ,_____

Detector ID Number: J_ ___ .. _,3996____ _________ ,.__L_~--

1 Source ID Number  ; 099803 ,_J*--*----------1----*---*--J__ ___.

Source Certification Date: __J_ 9/21!~_998___ j______ ,_

• ___

Detector Dead Layer(mm}  ; _0.8~____ !______ ___.J_~-----

• Test Date:  ! 10/13/2014 : 1

• --*-- ******-----k----*---..J-----

Nuclide ----*-'

I  !

ii Original L!-!~Jf*L.~J~~~~i !=ne!_g_yj~~- -~ctivity_JuCil_

~~

Cor~ected Activity (uCi)

Measured Activity (uCf)  % Difference Eu-152 ' . 4~8~E+(l_~~-L ...1~1:~----I-* 33.54

• 4.894E+03 ,

• 244.7

• 33.54 I. 14.617 14.617 15.44 14.23 5.63%

-2.65%

Eu-152 Eu-152 __ _l_~*.?.~~~3. _1 ~- 34fi.=j:~~.... 33.Sif**- ---- --14.617 I 13.57 ~7.16%

£.i,s_~~---- ........ --... - - ... J.__.1:_~~r;::r_p~_; ___ __?l~:~--~-3~.:.¥___ -14.617 13.23 -9.49%

Eu-152 --J--.:f-.:.~~E:':Q~.'... j___ 964:Q..... _ ;__ 33.54 --14.617-- - - 13.93 -4.70%

CD Eu-152 -:.. -~8~E+O~__J_,____1_1_12.Q_t--~'..54 . 14.617 13.23 -9.49%

0 Eu-152 I 4.894E+03 I 1408.0 33.54 14.617 I 13.35 I '-'8.67%

J,..

0

~

-u Dl

. cc (1) w co 8.

-l>-

01

l HPGe iSOCS Detector Verification & Validation Testing

=~=----T---~------~=~===-~-,--

Detector ID Number: * --r-~997 ~-. I Source ID Number _-,.-.-.--*-.-l--099S03--l-----*------~i---**--.----t--------+-.------+--------l 1

r=---=----=-~-=-------------**-- *-**-------L~----*---"f-------1-------11-------1 Source Certification Date: J 9/211199_8 ____ ~-*-*--**--L. -----j~----+--------+-------1 Detector Dead Layer (ml"!!l_ __! __ p.90__ ---!------ __ _:_ __ J__________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - 1

~.t Date: ;___ _!0/1~.?Q~------* __ .l_ _____ - - t - - . . . , . - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - 1 1 I Decay

! I *Original Corrected Measurement Eu-152 Nucl_~-==f-'!1"-""-l<!ays)l_E~-~1~(uCIL__AcO..,,

4.894E+03 , 121.8 33.54 (uCl) ' ""'""" (uCI) % Diffenmco

--14__:6-1~7--'-1---1-4~.9~1~----2-.0-1_% _ _,

Eu-152 - 4]94E+cJ3--:-*-244.7-- - 33.54 14.617 - 14.22 -2.71%

~:....--'-'------*. -------.!------ ----------- - -------*c-*---,.-~=---t---..,...,--::--=---+---=-o.-=:-:--

Eu-152 i 4.894E+03 __;_ 344.3 33.54 14.617 13.85 -5.25%

Eu-152 ---i---4.894E+Of 1 --naT ___ -----33:54 14.617 +---13-.5-3---<---7-.4-3_%_ _,

Eu,1s2 - - - - *----.-*****---J"4.894E+0s*--i 964.o* ***

• 33.54 --.--**-'1:....:4;..:.6:....:1-'-1--1--.--1.:..:3::.:.,4.:..;2'---1---a:....:_-'-19::...0fc..:...--1 Eu-152 -***- 4.894ffi+03~-1---_J}12,o__ I 33.54 14.617 14.08 -3.67%

.,,E'"""'u--1-5,....2-------- I 4.894E+03 : 1408.0 I 33.54 14.617 13.90 -4.90%

-u Dl (C

CD w

co 0

.j>.

01

HPGe ISOCS Detector Verification & Validation Testing I Detector Position:

Detector ID Number:

!; --+/-~~=~=+ --=-~-+1--*-----1*-------1------1 3998*---l------L*------<------1-------+------1 Source ID Number I 09980?__;_*-*--***-+------~

Source Certification Date: _L 9/21/199~__:_*_.____ ___J_ _ _ * * - - __ ---1-------+------1 HPGe Dead Layer (mm)

Test Date:

-+--___ 9_. __L_ ______ .. ---1----

• 10/9/2014 * * :

• - ---r-----1-------1 i--:~~~-------+-*--------T--*----1-*----*-- *---i-----__,.------l I I. I J Original I Decay Corrected Measured Nuclide IHalf-Life (days)_~ergy (keV) 1 Activity.,_,(u._C_i,_)-+-A_ct_i_v~ity"-'-(u_C_i)'-+_A_ct_i_v~ity..,....,_(u_C_i)'-+_o/c_o_D_ifli..,..e_,r,.,.en_c_e-i Eu-152 1 4.894E+03 __J 121.8 I 33.54 14.625 15.34 4.89%

1 Eu-152 ~~94E+.Q?.~*-* .* _244,7. ... ___!_. 33.~-~--;---1,...,4,....,.6=2=5---+---1,.,,5._,,.2:-=6---r--.4=-.-=:34=::%7 0 _-i Eu-152 , 4.894E+O~*--' 344.?___ l-~~:54 14.625 ____ 15_:7_0_ ___,,___7_._35_%

Eu-15+/-__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J_ 4.89~E+O~ .._L__?_?§_,_9__ ._.J__ 33.54 14.625 15.98 9.27o/o-Eu-152 ~94E+03 i 96~.o I 33.54 14.625 14.80 1.20%

Eu-152 --~~~4E+C1L~ 1112.0 I __ 33.54 14.625 15.17 3.73%

Eu-152 I 4.894E+03 : 1408.0  : 33.54 14.625 14.66 0.24%

-a Dl cc Cl>

-1>-

o 0

-l>-

01

Attachment 10.5 Pre-Operational Validation and Verification Testing of GARDIAN-1 System HPGE Detectors for use at Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Revision O ATTACHMENT 6.5 DETECTOR BASE LINE MEASUIREMEN'JI' RESULTS (5 pages including this cover sheet)

TBD-401 Page 41 of 45

Verification Me~~!:~Lnt~~~~-=J~~~=~c~~te:~~~~--*------t*-----+---'----I

~-eline Measurements for p~~r#~~:- .._..J. *------ --+------ ~- ----1 *------+------1

~:~:~:~~D:  :---~!~~~~1~~ -*=~=t=~=--=t-----*--t---------+--------1 Current Date: +.-'!.Q(.1_3/_2Q.~j*--+------+*-*---*--+--i_____ - - - - - l - - - - - - 1

,___ _ _ _N_u_cl_id_e ._ _ _} ; ; e (~~~-~ner:;~~-~ Cou-~t ~o:. :0s,)_-'J_c=. o: .:u~n;: .t~2='=(c: . :p=s. . ._)-=Co. : .: =oun:.:,:t:_: 3"'°'(="cp" s"'-)-!- =M:;.;e;:;:;a: ;:n~(c?'p: .:s:.<_jl 1

i.:E:.:u:...-1:.::5.::.5_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ __ _1~_12~!03 -+----..§_6.5 __ -*~ __ _!31.500 -+--=-3o=-:;..:..66::.:7__ _-=3c.:.0::.:.6~67_-1--.;;,,30::.:.9..:..44-'-_ 1 i.:.N.:;;a;...:-22=--- _ _ _ _ _ _ _..._'~9.504E+02 1274.5 r 6.367 _6;;.;.*..:..33_3_--1'---6""'.1"-1_7__-1--6--'.2""7'-2---1 Verification Measurements forBetec~-.r--~i~t-.-_*::~~ ~~t~~~ -~~*---r--* ---->---

0ate:------*--*--*=J-* *197fai26Tr*=-=*--=-==L.

~- Corrected Eu-155 (cp~_l___].Q..94!._j ______ _'.__**--*- -*-*

_=-- __-_-~:._-~~--+--.----+------i Decay Corrected Na-22 (c~) I 6.272 *--*--'-.. *-*-*---i -----1------l-------l

~-----*---i'---*----+-------i

~==~~: ~:~~~~~)) J_i:~. *- . :t . -==:*~-~=--~1=--=~ t*-_-_-__-_-_-__

Eu-155 Error (+/-10%)

Na-22 Error(+/- 10%)

L__.Q.00~---~----------***-**~--------.+-1*

r 0.00%

• I *---+- -*----+-------+-------!

-+-------t------,-j

~~ci~::::~~==!~/;i-t- ~~-::t::=- __--==-r===-+~~-

~ --- --- ~=~--i-~=--===-+ *:--=-=-----1--t--

---

1---------+------I

---+-----1------J

'---*------* -=--=---=r~=---===~~~-=--=--=--=r=~=-=---~1=------- +-------1------1

"'U Dl

<O CD

~

a 01

yerific~tion_ Measu~~mf nts__Fo!'_~-~~e__!~_q~f-~tectors~--*

Baseline Measurements for Det~ctor#3996:-+-***-*--****-*- .. -;---.. *--*- ------------1-------1 Source ID

• -------*-**-~----

oeteciorio:**--- --_------~ * *-j9.9~ .. -+~~~=-===~*=~=~

r ___ _98070=?_ ___

- - ---- ----~-

j ________~---------1-------+------1

• +---------1------ *-

Current Date: ---~~_Q/1~~?Q14~-----------'------+-----+------1-----1 1

. Nuclide ____ k1f-L~~;~~)i_-~::rg~~~YJJ~~:~~~;s~T~~~w_ s.ount (c~l_ Mean-~ 3

~~~~

5

-~~3~F~~- l-_---- .1.~~!5:-~.t=- z:::; :~. I- -~---~--=~~L Verification Measuremi:.!!~_for:*f!~~or #3~g~~-------+-------r=I __ -t-

~=g~~==-~~~~~~~~{j2i~~~-f~-~:-~~---r-*--

MeaSured Eu-155 (cps) _ --t-28.4_44 __ I_--;:~~=----1-:---

- -~*------+- ______,_________,

Meast11red Na-22 (cps)_ - _ ~ ... ?..§06____[______________ ---*-----1--------+--------1------1 Eu-155Error(+/-10%) t--*o.oo~-----'-----*---i--------------+------+------1 Na-22 Error (+/-10o/~ ___4__ 9.:QQ.~o_ J________ -t---**----1-----+/------+--------1 Eu-155 Channel (344 - 34L_~ ____346.67 __ j________ ------------*------j--------

Nla-22 Channel J5096

• 5100)____L ___ _?._Q~?..:.1~_L _________ . -~-- *f* -*---1---------+-------1

, __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .!__ _ _ ,;.__._,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J.__ 1 _____________ -+------'-1

=--*-==~~~=--= ,r*=~~~=~-~-- ~ -=~-=-~-~==-==~j-1.---==--**_-_. _--=--=--:========--+.;......------.:-_-_-_-_--_--_,

Verifica!ion _il{iea§>U!9-~~~~ f.~~--H~~-~l~Q9-~ 9_ete_~iors__ I_____--+-------+/--,-.- - - - - l

• I l

~line Measure~~~ Det=~~=~~f~-~--~~~~~~--~=-~~f~*

Detector ID:

.* ==l=----------1-----

L-29_!ll'._ _____ .;___________ .:_ ______=t_- - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - ____,

-+------1 1

~~:::t ~ate: ~ -*1~ft~J~~fi~-+====-t---------***-j---_:_*---->---------L*-----1 1------------~------+-'------***_j_______ - - - - - - - + - - - - - - l - - - - - - - l Nuclide _ !Hal!:.!-.!fe (d~~.>.L.5.ner~y (keV} I Co~nt 1(cps) Count 2 (cps) Count 3 (cps) Mean (cps)

Eu-155 I 1.8_12E+O?.. .. ~~---*-**-* 86.5 --~. _?_f?.833__ -,--27.333 *--t---2-=-7-=-.33:-::3::----+--2-=:-=.o~1:..,.J-.- - 1 Na-22 . *-*----~ r*-*-~-=-~~~~=-L--:~~~:?.~~.t==-~~183 ~~-~

Verification IY.!~asu!~~~nts f~r~9-o.~~~~?=-L---***-'--------L-----1-------1------1------1 6.183 5.917

-* ... _ ..... _ . *--* *---..!*--**- -*-----1-------* ....-L.. ------ *-*-+---------+-----~-----*

Date: i 10/13/2014 1 '

Ill

---

*--**~ **---**-- ---~*-*-*-----*-*"----

Decay Corrected Eu-155(cps} + _2?.:.!.~.!--.*~---*--- ..

Decay Corrected Na--22 Cce~L.J:__ __ ~Q_~ __ _j____

• --1*--*--* *

• L - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - -1

________J_--------1-------1-------1

~0 Measured Eu-155 (cps) +-+/-:?:: 1 16!.--i-------L------.. -~------1------1-------* /

..... Measured Na--22 (S>s} __ ~-Q.~+/- ... -1. -----------*-+--------l--

Eu-155 Error(~: 10%) I O.OO~ __ j ____ ---*----,-*----~-------+-------+------1 Na-22 Error (+/-10%) h0.00'}'?___ 1 - - - * - - - - i : - - - - - - * - - - t i - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - - - - 1

§!!:155 Channel (344 - 348L__.__ 346.2!___[" __________ .J__ _____ +-*-------1-----~-------1

~::.~ Channel (5096- 5100) 50~~.59 __:***------+*----*---*__,_------+----*-<--i_ _ _ _ __

1

!--------=___:____ -f-::::__::: :. -=~~=-_:: ~ ***~ *-_- _ -_-_-_--..:.~+*========~+-1~~-=-~~----l

Verification Measurements For HPGe iSOCS Detectors i Baseline MeasurementS.for f"----'-'--~'--"-'-:::..C- ...

Detecto-~~#3~~8: __:~-=-~--=--

==~--1.~:--.---=~--.----+------+-------1

-!--------t-*-*---------1--------+--------+-----*-

Detector ID: *+--3998--~-- -**---~----*-----~:---

Source ID  ! *-0-10702 . ----------,;--~----1--------1------1

~- 1~/10/20~~:~----***-+*-----1---------+------+------1 1

Current Date:

~._ _ _N_uclide ---*--*\Half*LE._e(days)___~e!:9L<!<e"l_ l Count1{cp~-~unt2 (cps)

• Count3(cps) Mean (c~)_

Eu-155 1.s12E+03 1 86.5 i 36.ooo _ ...__3_5_.8_33 ____,,__._36_._16_7_ __,___3_6_.o_o_o_ _,

Na-22 9.s0:1g:Q.~I~1?_?3}~~--r_:_::_:_::f.133 **-~--- _ _7""'.o'""o~o--+-__1....;;_3"-33'-'----1---'-7'--_1_12_-1

"-* *-----*J_______. _.=i. ___._______- - + - - - - - - t - - - - - - + - - - * - - - - 1 Verification Measurements for ~etectorf!~99!!:.__J_ ___ *-*-*-* --l---------+-------+------+------1

______________ ,. *-**--* .. - ____ .J**------*----'- -*-**---- *----------.-------!

~~=Y Corrected Eu-155 ~- l ~~~~b~i~~--i* *-~=~:::-_-~~==~-.

Decay Corrected Na-22 ~~_ 1 ___

--*-* 1--===---+--**===~=====::======-------i 7.172____ ~*---- . *~--------11------+------+-------1 Measured Eu-155(cps) 1 36.000  :. . 1_ _ *_-------+-------~--------<>-------<

Measured Na-22 ~-* ---=f-J.:!Z?..__ ._j:=~-=-==i------i--------+------+-----1 Eu-155 Error (+/-10%L______ ~-00o/'!.__ .~ -------L-.. **---

Na-22 Error {+/-10%) 1 _ O.OOo/~--+-****---*_j_-------+------+-------+-------1 Eu-155 Channel (345 - 349)  ! 346.17 . i Na-22 Channel {5096- 5100) I --~QS8~41-- r-=*~-=--=:~--r----*---~ ~~_:-----1------1-------1 1-------------==+=------r---------r---:---*----+------+-------+------i

---

**---*--*------*----+--- _____ _;__ ________,___~-------~-+-------

I  : '

---*--*----- *- -----*--~-** *----* **--T*--**-------*----~---------1------t-------c-------1

-u Dl cc CD

.j>.

CJ1 0

. .j>.

CJ1