At 0247 hours0.00286 days <br />0.0686 hours <br />4.083995e-4 weeks <br />9.39835e-5 months <br /> on October 25, 2006, with H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant (HBRSEP), Unit No. 2, in Mode 1 at 100% power, control room operators responded to alarms received for steam flow greater than feed flow on all three steam generators.
0Turbine first stage pressure indicated 0 psig.0Three of the four turbine governor valves indicated closed, the fourth indicated an intermediate position.0The control0rods began automatically inserting, as expected.0The net megawatt recorder indicated that electrical generation had rapidly reduced from 742 to 0 megawatts.0The control room operators diagnosed the event as a 100% load rejection and initiated a manual reactor trip at 0248 hours0.00287 days <br />0.0689 hours <br />4.100529e-4 weeks <br />9.4364e-5 months <br />, 68.8 seconds following the start of the event.
The root cause of this event was failure of a turbine governor valve electro-hydraulic control system card.0A pressurizer power operated relief valve lifted and reseated during the event.
The condition described in this Licensee Event Report is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), any event or condition that resulted in manual or automatic actuation of any of the systems listed in 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B). |
I. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT
At 0247 hours0.00286 days <br />0.0686 hours <br />4.083995e-4 weeks <br />9.39835e-5 months <br /> on October 25, 2006, with H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant (HBRSEP), Unit No. 2, in Mode 1 at 100% power, control room operators responded to alarms received for steam flow greater than feed flow on all three steam generators [EIIS System:Component AB:SG].
Turbine first stage pressure [EIIS System:Component TA:PI] indicated 0 psig. Three of the four turbine governor valves [EIIS System:Component TA:FCV] indicated closed, the fourth indicated an intermediate position. The control rods [EIIS System AA] began automatically inserting, as expected, due to the difference between reactor coolant average temperature and reference temperature, which is based on turbine first stage pressure. The reactor operator placed the rod control system in manual based on a misdiagnosis that a turbine first stage pressure channel had failed, since indicated pressure was 0 psig. The net megawatt recorder indicated that electrical generation had rapidly reduced from 742 to 0 megawatts. The control room operators diagnosed the event as a 100% load rejection and initiated a manual reactor trip at 0248 hours0.00287 days <br />0.0689 hours <br />4.100529e-4 weeks <br />9.4364e-5 months <br />, 68.8 seconds following the start of the event.
A pressurizer power operated relief valve (PORV) [EIIS System:Component AB:RV] lifted and reseated during the event. As a result of lifting, the pressurizer PORV has a current leakage rate of approximately 0.03 gpm. This leakage is being monitored in accordance with site procedures. The auxiliary feedwater system (AFW) [EIIS System BA] also initiated during the event, as expected, due to the low steam generator level that resulted from rapid closure of the turbine governor valves.
II. CAUSE OF EVENT
Investigation of this event was conducted using the Corrective Action Program and documented in Significant Nuclear Condition Report (NCR) 210311. This investigation found that the root cause of this event was a component failure in one of the five logic cards in the turbine governor valve electro-hydraulic control (EHC) system [EIIS System JJ].
The following five EHC system logic cards were replaced:
1. Digital-to-Analog (D/A) Converter 2. Up-Down Counter 3. High-Thresold Logic (HTL) Gate 6 4. Input Expander 5. HTL Gate 1 Technical representatives from Westinghouse and Data Techniques (a Westinghouse vendor) tested the removed logic cards. Three of the five cards were found to have anomalies. A weak transistor on the up-down counter card may have caused the counter to count incorrectly and could have caused the condition experienced. The vendor recommended that this card be replaced with a new style card.
The D/A converter card was found to be slightly out of calibration. The vendor determined that the small offset would not have an effect on the system. The HTL Gate 6 card had an intermittent failure of a single-gate circuit which is not believed to have contributed to this event.
III. ANALYSIS OF EVENT
The condition described in this Licensee Event Report is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), any event or condition that resulted in manual or automatic actuation of any of the systems listed in 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B).
The health and safety of the public and plant personnel were not impacted by this event. The required safety functions were maintained and the operating parameters of the plant remained within required safety limits. The steam generator PORVs and a pressurizer PORV lifted as designed to relieve system pressure. Based on a review of plant data, if the control room operators had taken no action, the automatic trip logic would have been satisfied and would have tripped the unit within 1 to 2 seconds of the manual trip. Given this short duration, no additional safety significance would have resulted if the manual trip had not been initiated.
The plant responded as designed and the operating crew manually tripped the reactor in response to the conditions they observed. The AFW system initiated during the event, as expected, due to the low steam generator level that resulted from rapid closure of the turbine governor valves.
During the event the reactor operator placed the rod control system in manual based on a misdiagnosis that a turbine first stage pressure channel had failed. Turbine first stage pressure channel failure indications were present during the initial stages of the event and some of the indications for a first stage pressure channel failure and a 100% load rejection are common. Once the load rejection was properly diagnosed, the crew took the appropriate and conservative actions to place the plant in a safe condition. The Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Section 15.2.2, Loss of External Load, includes the assumption that the rod control system is in manual at the start of the event. Additionally, the investigation of this event included simulator modeling to understand the impact on plant parameters due to having the rod control system in manual. This modeling found the impact to be minimal, and further found that the pressurizer PORV would have lifted if the rod control system had been left in automatic.
Therefore, placing the rod control system in manual did not significantly affect the event.
IV. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Immediate Corrective Actions:
The five logic cards in the EHC system were replaced. Operators have reviewed information and received simulator training on the proper response to turbine governor valve failures with regard to placing the rod control system in manual.
Planned Corrective Actions:
In accordance with vendor recommendations, the EHC system up-down counter card will be replaced with a new style card (1B51049-101) during the next refueling outage, which is currently scheduled to begin in April 2007.
V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Failed Component Information:
The failed EHC system card was a Westinghouse up-down counter card, Part Number 2822A82.
Previous Similar Events:
Licensee Event Report 1998-003-00 On April 25, 1998, at approximately 1334 hours0.0154 days <br />0.371 hours <br />0.00221 weeks <br />5.07587e-4 months <br />, steam generator (SG) level deviation alarms were received on all three SGs. Control room operators observed that turbine first stage pressure was rapidly decreasing and reactor control rods were automatically inserting. The control board operator placed the rod control system in manual based on a misdiagnosis that a turbine first stage pressure transmitter had failed low. Reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure increased to approximately 2335 psig resulting in opening of a pressurizer PORV.
The initiating event was the inadvertent closing of the turbine governor valves, which reduced steam flow and resulted in an increase in steam generator pressure. The increased steam generator pressure resulted in shrinkage of the steam generator levels below the reactor trip setpoint.
Troubleshooting of the EHC system, which controls the turbine governor valves, was performed by maintenance personnel assisted by a vendor technical representative. Various failure modes of the EHC system were investigated. Of the EHC system failures investigated, only changes to the impulse channel (which monitors turbine first stage pressure) corresponding to a pressure spike of approximately 35 psig, were found to duplicate the turbine governor valve response recorded during the event. No equipment failures were identified that would have resulted in the initiation of the event and the root cause of the event could not be definitively determined.
|
---|
|
|
| | Reporting criterion |
---|
05000305/LER-2006-010 | | | 05000456/LER-2006-001 | Unit 1 Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary Leakage Due To Inter-Granular Stress Corrosion Cracking of a Pressurizer Heater Sleeve | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | 05000454/LER-2006-001 | Technical Specification Required Action Completion Time Exceeded for Inoperable Containment Isolation Valves Due to Untimely Operability Determination | | 05000423/LER-2006-001 | Loss Of Safety Function Of The Control Room Emergency Ventilation System | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident | 05000369/LER-2006-001 | Ice Condenser and Floor Cooling System Containment Isolation Valve inoperable longer than allowed by Technical Specification 3.6.3. | | 05000353/LER-2006-001 | HPCI Ramp Generator Signal Converter Failure | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000352/LER-2006-001 | Loss Of One Offsite Circuit Due To Invalid Actuation Of Fire Suppression System | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000336/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor | 05000316/LER-2006-001 | Failure to Comply with Technical Specification 3.6.2, Containment Air Locks | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000315/LER-2006-001 | Plant Shutdown Required by Technical Specification Action 3.6.5.B.1 | | 05000293/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | 05000289/LER-2006-001 | | | 05000287/LER-2006-001 | Actuation of Emergency Generator due to Spurious Transformer Lockout | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000251/LER-2006-001 | Turkey Point Unit 4 05000251 1 OF 6 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000247/LER-2006-001 | Manual Reactor Trip Due to Multiple Dropped Control Rods Caused by Loss of Control Rod Power Due to Personnel Error | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000440/LER-2006-001 | Incorrect Wiring in the Remote Shutdown Panel Results in a Fire Protection Program Violation | | 05000413/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000368/LER-2006-001 | Completion of a Plant Shutdown Required by Technical Specifications Due to Loss of Motive Power to Certain Containment Isolation Valves as a Result of a Phase to Ground Short Circuit in a Motor Control Cubicle | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | 05000306/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | 05000298/LER-2006-001 | Cooper Nuclear Station 05000298 1 of 4 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000286/LER-2006-001 | I | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000282/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000266/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000261/LER-2006-001 | Manual Reactor Trip Due to Failure of a Turbine Governor Valve Electro-Hydraulic Control Card | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000255/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | 05000461/LER-2006-002 | Turbine Bypass Function Lost Due to Circuit Card Maintenance Frequency | | 05000458/LER-2006-002 | Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Manual Deactivation | | 05000456/LER-2006-002 | Units 1 and 2 Entry into Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3 due to Main Control Room Ventilation Envelope Low Pressure | | 05000443/LER-2006-002 | Noncompliance with the Requirements of Technical Specification 6.8.1.2.a | | 05000387/LER-2006-002 | DMissed Technical Specification surveillance requirement | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000362/LER-2006-002 | Unit 3 Shutdown to Inspect Safety Injection Tank Spiral Wound Gaskets | | 05000336/LER-2006-002 | Manual Reactor Trip Due To Trip Of Both Feed Pumps Following A Loss Of Instrument Air | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000316/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000315/LER-2006-002 | Failure to Comply with Technical Specification Requirement 3.6.13, Divider Barrier Integrity | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000293/LER-2006-002 | | | 05000289/LER-2006-002 | | | 05000251/LER-2006-002 | Intermediate Range High Flux Trip Setpoint Exceeded Technical Specification Allowable Value | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000440/LER-2006-002 | Scaffold Built in the Containment Pool Swell Region | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | 05000413/LER-2006-002 | Safe Shutdown Potentially Challenged by an External Flooding Event and Inadequate Design and Configuration Control | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000388/LER-2006-002 | Missed Technical Specification LCO 3.8.1 Entry for Unit 2 During Unit 1 ESS Bus Testing | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000348/LER-2006-002 | Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure to Close | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000305/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000301/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000286/LER-2006-002 | 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, N.Y. 10511-0249Entergy Tel (914) 734-6700 Fred Dacimo Site Vice President Administration September 13, 2006 Indian Point Unit No. 3 Docket No. 50-286 N L-06-084 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-P1-17 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Subject:L Licensee Event Report # 2006-002-00, "Manual Reactor Trip as a Result of Arcing Under the Main Generator Between Scaffolding and Phase A&B of the Isophase Bus Housing" Dear Sir: The attached Licensee Event Report (LER) 2006-002-00 is the follow-up written report submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73. This event is of the type defined in 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) for an event recorded in the Entergy corrective action process as Condition Report CR-IP3-2006-02255. There are no commitments contained in this letter. Should you or your staff have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Patric W. Conroy, Manager, Licensing, Indian Point Energy Center at (914) 734-6668. Fred R. Dacimo Site Vice President Indian Point Energy Center Docket No. 50-286 NL-06-084 Page 2 of 2 Attachment: LER-2006-002-00 CC: Mr. Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator — Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office Resident Inspector Indian Point Unit 3 Mr. Paul Eddy State of New York Public Service Commission INPO Record Center NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 06/30/2007
(6-2004)
. Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 50 hours.DReported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Records and FOIA/Privacy Service Branch (T-5 F52), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by internetLICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) e-mail to infocollects@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection. ■ 1. FACILITY NAME 2. DOCKET NUMBER I 3. PAGE
INDIAN POINT 3 05000-286 1 OF 6
4.TITLE: Manual Reactor Trip as a Result of Arcing Under the Main Generator Between
Scaffolding and Phase A&B of the Iso-phase Bus Housing | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000282/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000269/LER-2006-002 | High Energy Line Breaks Outside Licensing Basis May Result in Loss of Safety Function | | 05000263/LER-2006-002 | | | 05000255/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000254/LER-2006-002 | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000254 1 of 3 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000483/LER-2006-003 | Unexpected Inoperability of the Emergency Exhaust System due to Inoperable Pressure Boundary | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications |
|