|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022 NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022 (SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022 Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022 Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022 S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving Snf at San Onfre ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021 NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021 NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021 NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021 March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021 Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006 ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020 E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020 LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020 Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362) ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020 Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020 Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020 4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020 Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003) ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020 ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020 ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020 OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020 ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020 Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019 ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019 2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019 2.206 Petition Status Notification Email ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019 ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019 Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019 ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019 ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019 ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019 Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019 Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019 Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019 Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019 Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019 Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019 SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019 Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019 LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre ML19158A1312019-05-31031 May 2019 Paragon Energy Systems LLC -10 CFR Part 21 Report of Defect GS2 Terry Turbine Introl Positioners 2022-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed.-Nov 30, 2012 14:30 PAPER NUMBER: LTR- 12-0740 LOGGING DATE: 11/30/2012 ACTION OFFICE:
695 AUTHOR: Chrystal Coleman 4H* EDODEDMRT AFFILIATION: CA DEDR ADDRESSEE: Chairman Resource DEDCM AG
SUBJECT:
Restart of San Onofre PivU ACTION: Appropriate DISTRIBUTION:
LETTER DATE: 11/29/2012 ACKNOWLEDGED No SPECIAL HANDLING:
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
Wright, Darlene From: chrystal coleman [chrystalcoleman79@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:01 PM To: Collins, Elmo; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource; Ethics@EdisonIntl.com
Subject:
San Onofre My name is Chrystal Coleman. I live in Vista, 26 miles from San Onofre. I am a mother of 3 daughters. My family has lived in this area for over 5 generations. When the nuclear industry was introduced, 58 years ago, I had no voice in this matter. Today, I am here to speak for MY children, who have no voice in this matter.
I oppose the restart of the defective San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant. EVER. The recent radiation leaks at San Onofre and the subsequent inadequate response do not inspire public confidence that the restart of San Onofre would be safe. I would like to add my voice to thousands of others in the community in the call for a full, transparent Ajudicatory hearing where both the NRC and Southern California Edison are under oath.
Restarting San Onofre is essentially a "nuclear experiment" on the people of Southern California. The risks are too great. The nuclear industry is asking us to risk everything- our family, friends, homes, property, businesses, churches, schools, tourism, local economy, our food and water supply ..... our future generations ....... All for something we don't really need.
Nuclear Radiation is something we can't see, taste or smell. It knows no boundaries.
Exposure to nuclear radiation causes birth defects. It causes cancer. The effects sometimes don't show up until 10 or 20 years after exposure. It alters our DNA so that even if we don't experience it's effects, our children, our grandchildren and even our great-great grandchildren will. Children and developing fetuses are much more susceptible to radioactivity than adults.
I'm sure you know all this.
In 1986 the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant also conducted a "nuclear experiment" which ended in one of the worst nuclear disasters in our history. Millions of peoples' lives ruined, cut short or cut off, with no predictability of the direction the fall out would take or the havoc it would wreak. Contaminated food and water, exclusion zones, children developing any number of health problems prematurely. Families split up. Homes lost. Over $250 million dollars spent in recovery costs alone. Now we have Fukushima ....... Who's next? How many MORE times does it have to happen before we admit that nuclear power was a bad idea and stop perpetuating it? Certainly, we've been told our whole lives to expect" the big one" here in southern California. We can't accurately predict that a large scale earthquake would NEVER happen here. Hasn't a new fault line been discovered nearby? If San Onofre were being built today, would it's license even be granted considering the changes in standards and the lessons learned over the last several decades? Isn't it time to cut our losses and thank our lucky stars?
No matter how regulated the nuclear industry is, no matter how safe the equipment is, no matter how many laws we have in place, we cannot guarantee that there will never be an accident. There is no escape route. No going back.
There is no such thing as safe nuclear energy.
1
What happened at Chernobyl; and now at Fukushima- is a wake up call. And if we are lucky we can head off our own disaster before it truly is too late for our communities. What we need is a plan of action. A plan that starts by phasing out nuclear power plants immediately, and building up renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. A plan that begins with permanently decommissioning the nuclear plant that holds the worst safety track record in the country- San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Chrystal Coleman Mother and North County San Diego resident 2