NL-09-1410, VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML092520157)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)
ML092520157
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2009
From: Ajluni M
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-09-1410
Download: ML092520157 (12)


Text

Southern Nuclea:

Operating Company, Inc SOUTHERN'\

September 09, 2009 COMPANY tuogy to Sal't' limr World Docket Nos.: 50-425 NL-09-1410 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On April 23, 2009, Southern Nuclear Company (SNC) submitted relief request VEGP-ISI-RR-01 which requests relief from performing strand testing on Vogtle Unit 2 containment tendons, applicable for the 3rd inservice inspection interval.

On July 29, 2009, SNC received a request for additional information (RAI) letter, which contained three (3) questions. Per teleconference on July 24, 2009, the NRC staff acknowledged RR-L-2 submitted by SNC on April 5, 1999 and approved by the NRC on June 16, 2000 which approved SNC request to align containment tendon schedules for Unit 1 and Unit 2 for the second inspection interval. The staff requested SNC submit a similar request for the third inspection interval.

Enclosure 1 contains the SNC responses to the request for additional information.

Enclosure 2 contains the revised relief request VEGP-ISI-RR-01.

Enclosure 3 contains VEGP-ISI-ALT-04, proposed alternative in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a. VEGP-ISI-ALT-04 requests approval to align Unit 1 and 2 Class CC testing schedules.

SNC requests approval by May 1, 2010 to support testing scheduled for summer 2010.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Log: NL-09-1410 Page 2 This letter contains no NRC commitments. If you have any questions, please advise.

Sin~~~

M. J. Ajluni Manager, Nuclear Licensing MJAITAH/Iac

Enclosures:

1. Response to Request for Additional Information
2. VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)
3. VEGP-ISI-ALT-04, Version 1.0, Proposed Alternative in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i) cc: Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. J. 1. Gasser, Executive Vice President Mr. 1. E. Tynan, Vice President - Vogtle Ms. P. M. Marino, Vice President - Engineering RType: CVC7000 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator Ms. D. N. Wright, NRR Project Manager - Vogtle Mr. M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector - Vogtle State of Georgia Mr. C. Clark, Commissioner - Department of Natural Resources

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

Enclosure 1 Response to Request for Additional Information

Enclosure 1 Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

The licensee is requested to:

1. "Provide a detailed explanation and justification of how the "Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use" stated in RR VEGP-ISI-RR-01 ensures that the Unit 1 strand testing that is credited for Unit 2 is representative of the material condition of the Unit 2 tendons at the time of Unit 2 lift-off testing."
2. "The NRC staff requests the licensee to provide the dates of the most recent tendon lift-off testing performed for Unit 1 and Unit 2;"
3. "The NRC staff requests the licensee to provide the approximate schedule for tendon lift-off testing for Unit 1 and Unit 2 for the duration of the third 10-year lSI interval (5/31/2007 -5/30/20 17), for which the relief is requested."

RAI Response The following is SNC's response to the RAI:

1. VEGP-ISI-RR-01 has been modified to include that Unit 1 and Unit 2 liftoff testing is performed at the same time as modified by VEGP-ISI-ALT-04.

In addition, information has been included to justify the basis for utilizing IWL-2421.

2. Liftoff testing was last performed on Unit 2 during 2005, including one vertical tendon detensioned on Unit 1 for testing in accordance with RR-L
3. Liftoff testing on Unit 1 was last performed during 2000, including one horizontal and one vertical tendon detensioned on Unit 1 for testing in accordance with RR-L-3. Although approval was obtained to align liftoff testing for both units through RR-L-2 and Technical Specifications, lift off testing was not performed at the same time during the last interval.
3. See Table 1 of VEGP-ISI-ALT-04.

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

Enclosure 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

Enclosure 2 Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

Plant Site - Unit: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) - Unit 2.

Interval Interval Dates: 3rd lSI Interval, May 31,2007 through May 30, 2017.

Req uested Date for Approval: Approval is requested by May 1, 2010, to support examinations scheduled during the summer of 2010.

ASME Code Components Affected: VEGP-2 tendon strands.

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda: ASME Section XI, 2001 Edition through the 2003 Addenda.

Applicable Code Requirement: IWL-2523 requires that a strand sample be examined and tested.

IWL-2523.1 requires that one sample tendon, from each type, be detensioned completely and a single strand removed from each detensioned tendon.

IWL-2523.2 requires that the strands selected in IWL 2523.1 are tension tested and examined for corrosion and mechanical damage.

Impracticality of Compliance: The VEGP Unit 2 post-tensioning system was designed so that no tendons can be detensioned without creating voids in the sheathing filler material. Without the capability to completely detension a tendon, strand samples cannot be removed and tested. VEGP was originally licensed so that tendon lift-off and strand testing would be performed on Unit 1 only. Only the Unit 1 containment structure is equipped with the provision for tendon removal with detensionable anchorage assemblies as stated in VEGP UFSAR section 3.8.1.7.2.

Therefore, relief from the Code requirements should be granted under 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i) based on impracticality. The Unit 2 containment post tensioning system can not be modified to allow for compliance with the code requirements. The proposed alternative, which is based on testing that was approved by the NRC for the 2 nd E2-1

Enclosure 2 Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii) lSI interval, ensures that the structural integrity of the containment is being maintained.

Burden Caused by Compliance: The current Unit 2 containment configuration does not provide for compliance with the code requirements and the post tensioning configuration can not be modified to allow for compliance.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use:

1. VEGP will perform lift-off testing on the Unit 2 tendons in accordance with IWL-2520.
2. The strands selected during lift-off testing of Unit 1 will be credited for Unit 2.

Both Unit 1 and Unit 2 containments utilize the same prestressing system, are essentially identical in design (with the exception that Unit 2 tendons were not designed to allow detensioning), and are similarly exposed to the same environment. The post tensioning operations for VEGP-1 were completed April, 1986 and VEGP-2 in December, 1986. Therefore, the VEGP units meet the criteria of IWL-2421 (a) allowing for examinations per IWL 2421 (b). Based on the above, Vogtle 1 and 2 meet the requirements of IWL-2421 (a) for a relaxed examination schedule. Therefore, performance of IWL-2520 exams on Unit 2 while crediting Unit 1 strand testing for Unit 2 provides reasonable assurance of structural integrity of the Unit 2 unbonded post tensioning system.

A full test schedule is outlined in VEGP-ISI-ALT-04, Table 1.

Duration of Proposed Alternative: 3rd lSI Interval, May 31,2007 through May 30, 2017.

Precedents: An equivalent Relief Request (RR-L-3) was previously approved for Plant Vogtle.

References:

NRC Safety Evaluation dated June 16, 2000 - TAC NOS.

MA5314 AND MA5315.

Status: Awaiting NRC approval.

E2-2

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Unit 2 VEGP-ISI-RR-01, Version 1.0, Relief Request in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

Enclosure 3 VEGP-ISI-ALT-04, Version 1.0, Proposed Alternative in Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i)

Enclosure 3 Southern Nuclear Operating Company VEGP-ISI-ALT-04, Version 1.0 Proposed Alternative In Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i)

Plant Site-Vogtle Electric Generating Plant -Units 1 and 2 Unit:

Interval-Interval 3 rd lSI Interval, May 31, 2007 through May 30, 2017 Dates:

Requested Date for Approval is requested by May 1, 2010 Approval and Basis:

ASl\tlE Code The exterior portion of the VEGP-1 and 2 Containment Components Buildings fabricated from concrete and their post-tensioning Affected: systems.

Applicable Code ASME Section XI, 2001 Edition through the 2003 Addenda Edition and Addenda:

IWL-2410(a) states: "Concrete shall be examined in accordance with IWL-2510 at 1,3, and 5 years following the completion of the containment Structural Integrity Test CC Applicable 6000 and every 5 years thereafter."

Code Requirements: IWL-2420(a) states: "Unbonded post-tensioning systems shall be examined in accordance with IWL-2520 at 1, 3, and 5 years following the completion of the containment Structural Integrity Test and every 5 years thereafter."

Both Unit 1 and Unit 2 containments utilize the same prestressing system, are essentially identical in design (with the exception that Unit 2 tendons were not designed to allow detensioning), and are similarly exposed to the same environment. The post tensioning operations for VEGP-1 were completed April, 1986 and VEGP-2 in December, 1986. Therefore, the VEGP units meet the criteria of IWL Reason for 2421 (a) allowing for examinations per IWL-2421 (b). Based Request: on the above, Vogtle 1 and 2 meet the requirements of IWL 2421 (a) for a relaxed examination schedule.

The Unit 1 Structural Integrity Test (SIT) was completed on August 23, 1986 and Unit 2 SIT was completed on November 14,1988. Based on these dates, IWL 2421 (b)(1 &2), requires a1l1WL-2500 exams for Unit 1 be performed during 2016 (30-year exams) and Unit 2 during E3-1

Enclosure 3 Southern Nuclear Operating Company VEGP-ISI-ALT-04, Version 1.0 Proposed Alternative In Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i) 2013 (25-year exams). The scheduling of IWL exams do not line up with the schedule approved in previous relief request (2 nd interval RR-L-2) and Technical Specification amendments for testing concrete containments.

At the time of plant construction, it was decided that tendon surveillance for Unit 1 would involve the lift-off and detensioning of tendons, and that Unit 2 would require only visual examination. Since the two units are identical, credit was taken for lift-off testing and detensioning on both units when only one unit received lift-offs and detensioning. Due to the expense of repairing, inspecting, and testing the tendon surveillance platforms, Georgia Power Company, the former operator and licensee of VEGP and sister company to Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC), the current operator and licensee, requested a change to the Technical Specifications for VEG P-1 and 2 to allow testing of both containments during the same time period. The requested change was authorized by the NRC in a letter dated September 12, 1989, to Georgia Power Company, and resulted in Amendments 23 and 4 to the Technical Specifications for VEGP-1 and 2, respectively. In addition, lift-off testing was now required on Unit 2 beginning with the three-year inspection, so that lift-off testing would be performed on Unit 2 whenever lift-off testing and detensioning was performed on Unit 1.

Subsequently, with the adoption of the improved Standard Technical Specifications, containment tendon testing requirements were relocated to a containment testing program, TS 5.5.6, (Amendments 96 and 74). Amendments I 147 and 127, dated December 12, 2006, revised TS 5.5.6 to reference IWL for containment testina.

Prior to the amendment made to the VEGP Technical Specifications via SER dated December 12, 2006, containment tendon lift off testing was approved to be performed on a 1O-year frequency with both containment tests being performed during the same period. The 2006 Proposed amendment made reference to IWL for testing of the concrete containments; therefore, the schedule is no longer Alternative mentioned in Technical SpecHications. Continued use of and Basis for the previously approved Technical Specification change will Use: continue to provide assurance of containment structural integrity.

The frequency of proposed testing is equivalent to the requirements of the referenced edition and addenda of the ASME Section XI Code; however, on an alternate schedule E3-2

Enclosure 3 Southern Nuclear Operating Company VEGP-ISI-ALT*04, Version 1.0 Proposed Alternative In Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i) using an administrative date for the SIT date which aligns each Unit's testing with the original Technical Specification schedule (see proposed schedule below). The next tendon and concrete examinations will be performed on VEGP-1 and 2 by August 1, 2010 +/- 1 year and every 5 years +/- 1 year thereafter as outlined in Table 1.

Based on the lift off schedule being approved by a previous version of Technical Specifications, and these examinations being performed at the same frequency as required by the code, relief should be granted under 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i) because the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Duration of The 3rd lSI Interval, beginning May 31, 2007 and all Proposed subsequent intervals.

Alternative:

Similar alternative RR-L-2 approved for previous inspection interval by SER dated June 16, 2000 (TAC NOS. MA5314 and MA 5315).

Precedents:

A similar inspection schedule was approved for Farley Alternative RR-58 via SER dated March 28, 2006.

VEGP Technical Specifications SR 3.6.1.2 and 5.5.6 previously (prior to approval of Amendments 147 and 127

References:

for Unit 1 and 2, respectively, dated December 12, 2006) implemented the alternative examination schedule for lift off I testinQ.

Status: Awaiting NRC approval E3-3

Enclosure 3 Southern Nuclear Operating Company VEGP-ISI-ALT-04, Version 1.0 Proposed Alternative In Accordance With 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i)

Table 1 - Proposed IWL Examination Schedule Administrative SIT Date of 811/201 0 for application of future 5-year tests +/- 1 year (I)

Unit-I All IWL-2500 Cat. L-A Only IWL-2524 & All IWL-2500 Cat. L-A Only IWL-2524 &

&L-B IWL-2525 &L-B IWL-2525 08/01/09 - 08/0 III I 08/01114 - 08/01/16 08/01119 - 08/01/21 08/0 I/24 08/0 1/26 Unit-2 All IWL-2500 Cat. L-A Only IWL-2524 & All IWL-2500 Cat. L-A Only IWL-2524 &

& L-B as modified by IWL-2525 & L-B as modified by IWL-2525 VEGP-ISI-RR-OI 08/01114 - 08/01116 VEGP-ISI-RR-OI 08/01/24 - 08/01/26 08/01/09 - 08/01/11 08/0111 9 - 08/01/21 Foot notes:

(1) +/- 1 year means that examinations shall commence no earlier than 1 year prior to the specified date and shall be completed no more than 1 year after specified date (as allowed by IWL-241O(c) and IWL-2420(c)).

E3-4