Text

Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 27
	ML14134A041
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	05/14/2013
From:	Russell J; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	LR-N14-0084
	Download: ML14134A041 (158)
	v • d • e

SER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES RINTED20140328 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL FOR PSEG NUCLEAR LLC SALEM GENERATING STATION Revision 27 Prepared By: Reviewed by: SQR Accepted by: Approved by: ODCM Coordinator John Russell-A&ra ýýSalem Chemistry Mkager RVied 7Ay C-4 Reviewed by MarkPyl J Date Date Date Date PORC Chairman Robert IeNight Meeting #: 2-..Plant Mana'get/.)Larry Wagner Page 1 of 158 I -2 USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES PRINTED20140328 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Revision Summary ATTACHMENT 1 ODCM Change Summary Matrix Page 1 of 1 Salem X Hope Creek Fter (old) (new) Description of Change Date No. Rev. Rev. 27 Implemented 26 pg page No.page No.See plant 11 13 Reverted back to the Members of the Public definition, manager's signature for Justification:

rationale for using both I OCFR20 and 40CFRI 90 not adequate.

date 2 18 19 Modified 4.0.1 to reflect current Technical Specifications Editorial Justification:

Follows approved Technical Specifications 3 18 19 Modified 4.0.1 to reflect current Technical Specifications Editorial Justification:

Follows approved Technical Specifications 4 18 19 Modified 4.0.1 to reflect current Technical Specifications Editorial Justification:

Follows approved Technical Specifications 5 19 20 3.3.3.8.d Added "Report all deviations in the Radioactive Effluent Release. Report" Editorial Justification:

no reportability requirements for 3.3.3.8.a 22 23 Action 31 Added "grb"".in front 6f sampling.

Editorial Justification:

Matches other Action steps 7 25 26 3.3.3.9.c Added "Report all deviations in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report" Editorial Justification:

no reportability requirements for 3.3.3.9.a 8 32 33 Table 4.1 1-1 a. Added units (sec) to .and At and changed ; to Y Editorial Justification:

Editorial 9 35 36 3.11.1.3 Changed to "exceed 0.06 mrerm to the whole b'.ody or 0.2 mrem to any organ in a 31- See plant day period," and editorial revision to the paragraph.

manager's signature for Justification:

need appropriate 31 day limit, aligns with NUREG 1301. date 10 36 37 3.11.2.b and 4.11.2.1.2 Added 1-133 See plant manager's Justification:

original TS used "radioiodines" later revision changed to 1-131 but omitted I- signature for 133 as required by TS 6.8.4.g (9) date 11 40 41 3.11.2.3.a and 4.11.2.3 Added 1-133 See plant manager's Justification:

original TS used "radioiodines" later revision changed to 1-131 but omitted 1- signature for 133 133 as required by TS 6.8.4.g (9) date 12 41 42 3.11.2.4 changed limits to "0.2 mrad in air from gamma radiation, or See plant 0.4 mrad in air from beta radiation or, 0.3 mrad to any organ to a MEMBER OF THE manager's PUBLIC" signature for Justification:

need appropriate 31 day limit, aligns with NUREG 1301 date 13 42 43 .3.11.4.a changed to 10 CFR Part 20.2203 (iv) from 10 CFR Part 20.405c Editorial Justificationt regulatory reference changed Page 2 of 158 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Item (old) (new) Description of Change Date No. Rev. Rev. 27 Implemented 26 pg page No.page No.14 42 43 4.11.4.1 changed to the CONTROLS reference rather than the surveillance section Editorial Justification:

Typos 15 45-51 46-52 Renamed Table 3.12.1-1 to Table 3.12-1 Editorial Justification:

Agreement with text references 16 45 46 Table 3.12-1 changed number of direct reading dosimeters to 58 from 49. April 2010 &Changed distances of the outer ring to match NUREG 1301. January 2013 Editorial Removed not bounded by water Justification:

Reflects current number of locations.

17 45 47 Changed and added number of air sample locations and changed "high" to the NUREG January 2011 specified "highest" Justification:

Reflects current number of locations and aligns with the NUREG 18 46 48 Removed sampling of the Cooling Tower Blowdown sediment Editorial Justification:

Inadvertently copied when revising Salen/Hope Creek revision 16 19 48 50 Aligned requirements for Food products from 3/4 12.2 Editorial Justification:

Alignment with the NUREG 20 49 51 Table 3.12-1 Note (2). Added clarification ofPD, "a device meeting the criteria of ANSI Added N545", and all sectors now have a passive dosimeter.

additional monitoring.

Justification:

Clarification allows any type of dosimeter:

all sectors have a dosimeter..

21 49 51 Table 3.12-1 Note (3) Added explanatory note for additional air sampler locations.

Editorial Justification; Added new air samplers from above 22 50 52 Table 3.12-1 Note (9). Changed to read "The dose shall be calculated for the maximum See plant organ and age group using the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. There are no manager's farms that meet the 5 km requirement and it is unlikely that any releases from the site will signature for approach the I mrem criteria at 5 to 8 kim. Milk samples will be taken (owner obliging) date within 8 km and other management audit samples within 16 kim. Broad leaf vegetation (within 8 kin) shall be sampled using the site gardens to demonstrate compliance with this pathway.Justification:

Clarification of pathway 23 54 55 Table 4.12-1 (2) deleted "thermoluminescent" Editorial Justification:

Allows for technical substitution of qualified dosimeters 24 53 55 Corrected calculation for the picocurie LLD Editorial Justification:

2.22 E6 is the dpm to microcurie conversion factor 25 53 55 See plant Added value for very low count rate samples manager's Justification:

Added from NUREG 4007 signature for date 26 55 57 Added text for elevated releases Editorial Justification:

Alignment with the NUREG 27 57 59 3.12.3 Added "that has been approved by the Commission, that correspond to samples Editorial required by Table 3.12-1." to the end of the paragraph.

Page 3 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Item (old) (new) Description of Change Date No. Rev. Rev. 27 Implemented 26 pg page No.page No.Justification:

Editorial enhancement.

28 64 66 BASES 3/4.11.2.3 Added 1-133 Editorial Justification:

original TS used "radioiodines" later revision changed to 1-131 but omitted 1-133 133 as required by TS 6.8.4.g (9)29 66 68 BASES 3/4.12.1 Added text from the NUREG that had been omitted. Editorial Justification:

Editorial enhancement.

30 80 82 Updated section 1.6 to reflect changes to control 3.11.1.3 See plant manager's Justification:

Aligns with the 31 day limits in NUREG 1301 signature for date 31 107 109 Added new location to controlling pathways.

See plant manager's Justification:

Carbon 14 dose calculations added a new pathway signature for date 32 136 138 Appendix D Corrected Table reference to Table 2-3 from Table 3.2-4 in W variable Editorial description.

Justification:

Table 3.2-4 doesn't exist. Table 2-3 describes the required values.33 141 143 Added PD locations to Table E-1 Editorial Justification:

Aligns with new dosimeter locations 34 142 144 Added Air Sample locations to Table E-1 Editorial Justification:

Aligns with new dosimeter locations 35 145 146 Added Broadleaf Sampling locations 2006 Justification:

Have been part of the program, but not noted.36 147 149 Updated map Editorial 37 148 150 Updated map Editorial I I I I!I I Page 4 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 9 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS 10 1.0 DEFINITIONS 12 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 18 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY 18 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 20 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 20 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 26 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 31 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION 31 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE 35 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT 36 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 37 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE 37 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES 40 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE 133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM 41 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT 42 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE 43 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 44 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM 44 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS 57 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORA TORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 59 BASES 60 3/4.3 INSTR UMENTA TION 61 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 61 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 62 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 64 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 64 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 65 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE 67 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 68 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM 68 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS 68 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 68 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES 70 5.1 SITE 70 5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS 70 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 72 6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 72 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 72 Page 5 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 74 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES 75 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 76 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls 76 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination 76 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service Water. 77 I 1.2.2 Conservative Default Values 78 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 79 1.4 Liquid Effltent Dose Calculation

-10 CFR 50 79 I 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents.

79 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation.

81 Total Body 81 I 1.5 Secondai.v Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents and Dose Calculations During Primary to Secondary Leakage 81 1.6 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections 82 I 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 82 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls 82 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination 84 I 2.2.1 Containment and Plant Vent Monitor 84 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values 85 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations

-10 CFR 20 85 I 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases 85 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates 87 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations

-10 CFR 50 87 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases 87 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases 88 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations

-10 CFR 50 89 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates 89 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates.

89 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations 90 2. 7 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection 92 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSES 93 3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY 93 3.2 Total close to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 93 3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations 93 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination.

94 3.3 Doses Due to Carbon 14 in Gaseous Effluents 94 3.3.1 Estimation of Carbon 14 in Annual Releases 94 3.3.2 Carbon 14 dose Determinations 95 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 95 4.1 Sampling Program 95 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program 95 Page 6 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLES TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL M ODES ....................................................................................

15 TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION ...............................................................................

16 TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION

......................................................................................................................................................

2 1 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

...................................................................................

24 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING IN ST R U M EN T A T IO N ................................................................................................................

27 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

.............................................

29 TABLE 4.11-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM.......................................................................................................................................................

3 2 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P R O G R A M ...................................................................................................................................

3 8 TABLE 3.12-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM * ........ 46 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN EN VIRONM ENTAL SAM PLES .............................................................................................

53 TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE A N A L Y S IS .2. ...........................................................................................................................

54 Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1 .............................

99 Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations

-Unit 2 ............................

100 TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Aio .......................

................... 101 T able 1-3: B ioaccum ulation Factors ...........................................................................................

103 Table 2-1: D ose Factors For N oble G ases ..................................................................................

106 Table 2-2.1: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations

-Unit 1 ..........................

107 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Detenninations

-Unit 2 .........................

108 Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathw ays ..............................................................................

109 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases ........................................................

110 Table A-l: Calculation of Effective M PC -Unit 1 .....................................................................

125 Table A-2: Calculation of Effective M PC -Unit 2 .....................................................................

126 Table B-1: Adult Dose Contributions

-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit I ......................

130 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions

-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 2 ......................

131 T able C -i: Effective D ose Factors ..............................................................................................

136 Table D -1: Infant D ose C ontributions

........................................................................................

140 TAB LE E-1: R EM P Sam ple Locations

......................................................................................

143 Table F-i: M aximum Perm issible Concentrations

.....................................................................

152 Page 7 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FIGURES FIGURE 5.1-3: AREA PLOT PLAN OF SITE ....................................................................

71 Figure 1-1: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 1 ........................................................................

96 Figure 1-2: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 2 ........................................................................

97 Figure 1-3: Liquid Radioactive Waste System ....................................................................

98 Figure 2-1: Salem Ventilation Exhaust Systems and Effluent Monitor Interfaces

............

104 Figure 2-2: Gaseous Radioactive Waste Disposal System .....................................................

105 Figure E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

.................................................................

149 Figure E-2: OFFSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

...............................................................

150 I I I I I I I I APPENDICES APPENDIX A: EVALUATION OF DEFAULT PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID EFFLUENTS

..............................

123 APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATIONS

-LIQUID EFFLUENTS

.........

128 APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL BASES FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS -GASEOUS EFFLUENTS

................

133 APPENDLX D: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATION

-GASEOUS EFFLUENTS

....... 138 APPENDIX E: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM .........................................

142 APPENDIX F: MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATION (MPC) VALUES -LIQUID EFFLUENTS

........ 152 Page 8 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Salem Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is a supporting document to the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications.

The previous Limiting Conditions for Operations that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Tecnmical Specifications (RETS) are now included in the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls (REC). The ODCM contains two parts: Part I -Radiological Effluent Controls, and Part II -Calculational Methodologies.

Part I includes the following: " The Radiological Effluent Controls and the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specifications 6.8.4* Descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively.

Part II describes methodologies and parameters used for: " the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints; and* the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates, cumulative quarterly and yearly doses, and projected doses.Part II also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP), and the liquid and gaseous waste treatment systems.Revisions to the ODCM shall be made in accordance with the Technical Specifications Section 6.14.The current licensing basis applies Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPCs) for radioactive liquid effluent concentration limits. Since the MPC values were removed from 1 OCFR20 effective 1/1/94, the MPC values are provided as Appendix F to the ODCM. As discussed in the Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation related to Amendment Nos. 234 and 215, letters between the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) concerning the differences between the "old" 1 OCFR20 and the "new" 1 OCFR20 allowed continued use of the instantaneous release limits (MPCs).The NUMARC letter of April 28, 1993, concluded that the RETS that reference the "old" Part 20 are generally more restrictive than the comparable requirements of the "new" Part 20, and therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1008, the existing RETS could remain in force after the licensee implements the "new" Part 20. The letter stated that the existing RETS which reference the "old" Part 20 would maintain the level of required protection of public health and safety, and would be consistent with the requirements of the "new" Part 20.Page 9 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 I I I I Page 10 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS Page 11 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1.0 DEFINITIONS DEFINED TERMS 3 1.1 The DEFINED TERMS of this section appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these CONTROLS.ACTION 1.2 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions.

CHANNEL CALIBRATION 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output such that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel monitors.

The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel, including the required sensor, alarm, display, and trip functions, and shall include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. 1 Calibration of instrument channels with resistance temperature detector (RTD) or thermocouple sensors may consist of an inplace qualitative assessment of sensor behavior and nonnal calibration of the remaining adjustable devices in the channel. Whenever an RTD or thermocouple sensing element is I replaced, the next required CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include an inplace cross calibration that compares the other sensing elements with the recently installed sensing monitor. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION may be perfonned by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel I steps so that the entire channel is calibrated.

CHANNEL CHECK I 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation.

This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter.

CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST I 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the primary sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions.

CONTROL 1.10 The Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications were transferred to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) and were renamed CONTROLS.

This is to distinguish between those LCOs that were retained in the Technical Specifications and those LCOs or CONTROLS that were transferred to the ODCM.DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of I-131 (microcuries per gram), which I alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Federal Guidance Report No. II (FGR 11), "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion".

Page 12 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.13 The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.2.GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.14 A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the primary system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment.

MEMBER(S)

OF THE PUBLIC 1.15 MEMBER(S)

OF THE PUBLIC shall include all persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of the licensee, its contractors, or vendors.Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries.

This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational or other purposes not associated with the plant OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)1.16 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alanrn/trip setpoints, and in the conduct of the environmental radiological monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain (1)the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Enviromnental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specification Section 6.8.4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and the Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Technical Specification Sections 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively.

OPERABLE -OPERABILITY 1.17 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, normal or emergency electrical power source, cooling and seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component or device to perform its specified safety function(s) are also capable of perfonning their related support function(s).

OPERATIONAL MODE -MODE 1.18 An OPERATIONAL MODE (i.e., MODE) shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table 1.1.PURGE -PURGING 1.23 PURGE or PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.

Page 13 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 RATED THERMAL POWER 1.25 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactorI coolant of 3459 MWt.REPORTABLE EVENT I 1.37 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in Section 50.73 to 1OCFR Part 50 or 10CFR 72.75.SITE BOUNDARY 1.29 The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land or property is not owned, leased, or otherwise controlled by the licensee, as shown in Figure 5.1-3.SOURCE CHECK 1.31 SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel response when the channel sensor is exposed to either (a) an external source of increased radioactivity, or (b) an internal source of radioactivity (keep-alive source), or (c) an equivalent electronic source check.THERMAL POWER 1.33 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.UNRESTRICTED AREA 1.35 An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY, access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals flom exposure to radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or industrial, commercial, institutional, and/or recreational purposes.VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.36 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine and radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment (such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents).

Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components.

VENTING 1.37 VENTING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in system names, does not imply a VENTING process.WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM 1.41 A WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting Reactor Coolant System offgases from the Reactor Coolant System and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment.

Page 14 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL MODES MODE 1. POWER OPERATION 2. STARTUP 3. HOT STANDBY 4. HOT SHUTDOWN 5. COLD SHUTDOWN 6. REFUELING**

REACTIVITY CONDITION, Keff THERMAL POWER*> 0.99 >5%> 0.99 < 5%< 0.99 0< 0.99 0 AVERAGE COOLANT TEMPERATURE

> 350OF> 350°F> 350°F 350°F > Tavg> 200°F< 200°F< 140°F< 0.99<0.95 0 0* Excluding decay heat.** Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.Page 15 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION S D w M Q SA R S/U P N.A.FREQUENCY At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .At least once per 7 days.At least once per 31 days.At least once per 92 days.At least once per 6 months.At least once per 18 months.Prior to each reactor startup.Prior to each release.Not applicable.

Page 16 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 17 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 I 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY CONTROLS !3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS contained in the succeeding CONTROLS is required during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet the CONTROL, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met.3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROLS and U associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals.

If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in a MODE in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in: 1. At least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months , 2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months , and 3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.

I This CONTROL is not applicable in MODE 5 or 6.3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition: (a) shall not be made when the conditions of the CONTROL are not met and the associated ACTION requires a shutdown if they are not met within a specified time interval.(b) may be made in accordance with ACTION requirements when conformance to them permits I continued operation of the facility for an unlimited period of time.This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL MODES as required to comply I with ACTION requirements.

Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.I Page 18 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPLICABILITY SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

4.0.1 Surveillance

Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for individual Limiting Conditions for Operation, unless otherwise stated in the Surveillance Requirement.

Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the Limiting Condition for Operation.

Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified frequency shall be failure to meet the Limiting Condition for Operation, except as provided in Specification

4.0.3. Surveillances

do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment or variables outside specified limits.4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified surveillance interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the specified surveillance interval.4.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the Limiting Condition for Operation not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or up to the limit of the specified frequency, whichever is greater. This delay period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance.

A risk evaluation shall be performed for any Surveillance delayed greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months and the risk impact shall be managed.If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the Limiting Condition for Operation must immediately be declared not met and the applicable Actions must be entered.When the Surveillance is performed within the delay period and the Surveillance is not met, the Limiting Condition for Operation must immediately be declared not met and the applicable Actions must be entered.4.0.4 Entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability of an LCO shall only be made when the LCO's Surveillances have been met within their specified Frequency, except as provided by SR 4.0.3. When an LCO is not met due to Surveillances not having been met, entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability shall only be made in accordance with LCO 3.0.4.This provision shall not prevent entry into MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS or that are part of a shutdown of the unit.Page 19 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION

!I i i I I CONTROLS 3.3.3.8 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 1, the radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-12 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded.

The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be detennined in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).APPLICABILITY:

During all liquid releases via these pathways.ACTION: a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-12. Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

d. Report all deviations in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.8 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-12.Page 20 of 158!I

-- = M--- -M l M IM m -M M- -Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS OPERABLE UNSTRI JMFENT ACTION INSTR MENT 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line 2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE 1 (1R18, 2R18)4 (1R19A-D, 2R19A-D)26 27 a. Containment Fan Coolers -Service Water Line Discharge b. Chemical Waste Basin 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES 2(Unit 1) (1R13A, B)2 (Unit 2) (2R13A, B)1 (R37)28 31 a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1 (1FR1064, 2FR1064)4 (1FA-3178, -3180, -3182, -3184, 2FA-3178, -3180, -3182, -3184)29 29 Page 21 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION ACTION 26 -ACTION 27 -ACTION 28 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may continue provided that prior to initiating a release: a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with CONTROL 4.11.1.1.1, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1..B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed:

a. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is greater than 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-13 1, or b. At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is less than or equal to 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that: a. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months , local monitor readouts for the affected channels are verified to be below their alarm setpoints, or b. With a Service Water System leak (inside containment) on the Containment Fan Coil Unit associated with the inoperable monitor either: 1. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months , grab samples are to be collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed, or 2. Isolate the release pathway.c. With no identified service water leakage (inside contaimnent) on the Containment Fan Coil Unit associated with the inoperable monitor, at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , collect grab samples and analyze for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed.

Page 22 of 158 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION ACTION 29 -ACTION 31 -With the number of chanmels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during actual releases.Pump perforlnance curves may be used to estimate flow.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that grab sampling is conducted in accordance with the following table: Frequency 1 per week I per day Condition During normal operation (all MODES)During operation with an identified primary to secondary leak on either Salem Unit The grab samples shall be analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11 -1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 shall be performed.

Page 23 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK SOURCE CHANNEL CHECK CALIBRATION CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line D D P#M R(3)R(3)Q(l)Q(l)2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Containment Fan Coolers -Service Water Line Discharge D D M M R(3)R(3)Q(2)Q(5)b. Chemical Waste Basin Line 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line D(4)D(4)N.A.N.A.R R N.A.N.A.Page 24 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.3-12 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Control Room Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Control Room Instrument indicates a downscale failure.4. Instrument controls not set in operate mode. (On instruments equipped with operate mode switches only {Unit 1})(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers.

The activity of the calibration sources were reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS (now NIST) standards.

(4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release.CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.(5) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alanr/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)# The R18's channels off-line channels which requires periodic decontamination.

Any count rate indication above 10,000 cpm constitutes a SOURCE CHECK for compliance purposes.Page 25 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS U 3.3.3.9 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 1, the radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-13 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded.

The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM.APPLICABILITY:

As shown in Table 3.3-13 ACTION: a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip I setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-13.Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

d. Report all deviations in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report.SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.9 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by perfonnance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-13.Page 26 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPI ,IC AnII .ITV A CTTONI APPLICABILITY CTION 1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 2. CONTAINMENT PURGE a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 3. CONTAINMENT PRESSURE -VACUUM RELIEF a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 4. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM##a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1 (1R41A&D, 2R41A&D)1 (1R12A or 1R41A&D, 2R12A or 2R41A&D) #1 (1R12A or 1R41A&D 2R12A or 2R41A & D) #1 (1R41A&D, 2R41A&D)******31 34 37 33 36 36 32 32 b. Iodine Sampler I (1RME4, 5 or 1XT8911, 2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)c. Particulate Sampler 1 (1RME4, 5 or 1XT8911, 2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) 1 (1RM-1FA8603, 2RM-2FA8603)

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 1 (1RM-1FA17079 or S1PAS-1FA6863Z, 2RM-2FA17079 or S2PAS-2FA6863Z)

1. The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described: (a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Contaimnent Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 27 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 ACTION 31 -ACTION 32 -ACTION 33 -ACTION 34 -ACTION 36 -ACTION 37 -TABLE 3.3-13 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, the contents of the tank(s) may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiating the release: a. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valving lineup;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months and these samples are analyzed for gaseous principal gamma emitters at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL TABLE 4.11-2.A, B, or C within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, immediately suspend PURGING of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 4.11-2.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, Containment Pressure Reliefs may be performed provided that prior to initiating the release: I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I a. At least two independent samples of containnment are analyzed, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations.

Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.* At all times, other than when the line is valved out and locked.** During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure -Vacuum Relief APPLICABILITY:

Modes 1-6, R41A/D Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Modes 1-5, RI2A Monitor providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Mode 6, R12A Monitor providing Alarm only (Automatic Termination of Release is not required).

During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, contaimnent purge is reclassified as a building ventilation process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.# During movement of irradiated fuel within contaimnent with the Containment Equipment Hatch OPEN, only R4IA/D can be credited for MINIMUJM CHANNEL OPERABLE.During movement of irradiated fuel within contaimnent with the Containnment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R41A/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.Page 28 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REOUIRED 1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor- Providing P P R(3) Q(1)Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 2. CONTAINMENT PURGE AND PRESSURE -VACUUM RELIEF a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor P P R(3) Q(M) **3. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM#a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(3) Q(2) *b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) D N.A. R N.A. *e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor W N.A. R N.A. *# The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described: (a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Containment Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 29 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.3-13 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this 3 pathway and Control Room alarm anmunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alam-/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Control Room Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Alarm Only) I (2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation I occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarnm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Control Room Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous I calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers.

The activity of the calibration sources were reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS (now NIST) standards.

At all times I** During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure -Vacuum Relief Surveillance requirement

-Modes 1-6, R41A/D Monitors providing Alarn- and Automatic Termination of Release I Modes 1-5, R 12A Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release Mode 6, R12A Monitors providing Alarrn only (Automatic Termination of Release is not required).

During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, contaimnent purge is reclassified as a building ventilation process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containmnent Equipment Hatch I OPEN, only R41A/D can be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.During movement of irradiated fuel within contaimnent with the Containment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R41A/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.Page 30 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 In accordance with the Salem Units I and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 2 and 3, the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (See Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 10-4 microcuries/ml.

APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the concentration to within the above limits.SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analyses program in Table 4.11-1.4.11.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.Page 31 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.11-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Liquid Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)a Type Frequency Frequency Analysis ([LCi/ml)A. Batch Waste P P Release Each Batch Each Batch Principal Gamna 7 Tanksb Emittersc 5x1 O 1-131 1x10-6 P M Dissolve and 5 One Batch/M Entrained Gases lx 0 (Gamma Emitters)P M H-3 Each Batch Composited 1x 10-Gross Alpha 1x10-7 P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Each Batch Composite Fe-55 1X10 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I B. Continuous Releasese 1. Steam Generator Blowdown Principal Gamma Emitters'5x10-7 W Grab Sample W Page 32 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.11-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):

LLD= 4.66eSb E

V

2.22E6

Y

exp(-AAt)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume), 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1301 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute), E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration), V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume), 2.22E6 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable), Xý is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec -1) , and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting (sec).Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a prori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact)limit for a particular measurement.

Page 33 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.11 -1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed to assure representative sampling.c. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides:

Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-i 34, Cs-i 37, Ce-141, and Ce-144*. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported.

Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported.d. A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume, e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.* The LLD for Ce-144 shall be 2x 10-6 pCi/ml.U I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I Page 34 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.4 and 5, the dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited: a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrern to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mremr to any organ, and b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mremn to any organ.APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Cormnission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 35 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS I 3.11.1.3 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the liquid radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of the system used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses due to the liquid effluent, from each unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) would exceed 0.06 mrem to the total body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in a 31 day period.APPLICABILITY:

At all times. I ACTION: a. With the radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the I above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11. 1.3 Doses due to liquid releases shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the ODCM.I Page 36 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.3 and 7, the dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:

a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and b. For iodine- 131, iodine 133, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined continuously to be within the above limits in accordance with the ODCM.4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate forn with half lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11-2.Page 37 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Gaseous Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (PmCi/ml)A. Waste Gas P P Storage Each Tank Each Tank Principal Gamma x 10i4 Tank Grab Sample Emittersb B. Containment P P Principal Gamma 1x10-4 PURGE Each PURGE Each PURGE Emittersb Grab Sample H-3 1x10-6 C. Plant Vent Mc'de Principal Gammrna 1 x -4 Grab Sample Mc Emittersb H-3 1x10-6 D. All Release Continuous f W9 1-131 1x10-12 Types as Charcoal Listed in A, Sample B, and C Above Continuousf Wg Principal Ganmma 1x 1011 Particulate Emittersb Sample (1-131, Others)Continuousf M Gross Alpha 1x1 0-I Composite Particulate Sample Continuousf Q Sr-89, Sr-90 1x 101 Composite Particulate Sample Continuousf Noble Gas Noble Gasses 1 x 10-6 Monitor Gross Beta or Gamma I!I I I!I I I I I I I I Page 38 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.11-2 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined in Table 4.11.1 b. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides:

Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, Xe-138 for gaseous emissions and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 for particulate emissions.

This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported.

Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported.c. Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup or a THERMAL POWER change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER unless: 1. Analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of three; and 2. The noble gas activity monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.d. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months when the refueling canal is flooded.e. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the ventilation exhaust from the spent fuel pool area whenever spent fuel is in the spent fuel pool.f. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2 and 3.11.2.3.g. Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months after changing (or after removal firom sampler).

Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup or THERMAL POWER change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months of changing.

When samples collected for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement does not apply if (1) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.Page 39 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES CONTROLS !3.11.2.2 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 8, the air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, from the site areas and I beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.

APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 40 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE 133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 9, the dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine- 131, from tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated air dose from the release of iodine-131, iodine 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine-131, iodine 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 41 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.2.4 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall OPERABLE and appropriate portions of these systems shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses in 31 days due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3), would exceed: 0.2 mrad in air from gamma radiation, orI 0.4 mrad in air from beta radiation, or 0.3 mrad to any organ to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC 3 APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: a. With gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Explanation of why gaseous radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.4 Doses due to gaseous releases from the site shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the ODCM.Page 42 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4. In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification s 6.8.4.g. 11, the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, due to releases of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ (except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem).APPLICABILITY:

At all times ACTION: a. With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2a, 3.11.1.2b, 3.11.2.2a, 3.11.2.2b, 3.11.2.3a, or 3.11.2.3b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the reactor units and from outside storage tanks to determine whether the limits of this CONTROL have been exceeded.

If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. 2203 (iv), shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations.

If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 and 10 CFR 72.104. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, 3.11.2.3, and in accordance with the ODCM.4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor units and from radwaste storage shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM.Page 43 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.1. In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h. 1, the radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 3.12-1.APPLICABILITY:

At all times. I ACTION: I a. With the radiological enviromnental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Enviromnental Operating Report required by Technical Specification 1 6.9.1.7, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence.

b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within I 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3.

When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 3.12-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if: concentration (1) concentration (2) _ > 1.0 reporting level (1) reporting level (2)When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.12-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the I calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3.

This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual I Radiological Enviromnental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.*The methodology used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report. 3 Page 44 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS ACTION: (Cont'd)c. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program.Pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report. Include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).

d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1 The radiological enviromnrental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12-1, and the detection capabilities required by Table 4.12-1.Page 45 of 158 M --- M M M =--- -M-Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM *EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE 1. DIRECT RADIATION (2)NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (I)Fifty-eight routine monitoring stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows: SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly An inner ring of stations one in each land based meteorological sector in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY;An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 6 to 8 km range from the site;and The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations.*The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable.

Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sample program.Page 46 of 158

=mm M M -M Mm m Mn M M m Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (I)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 2. AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 5 (3) locations:

Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading.Radioiodine Canister 1-131 analysis weekly.Three samples from close to the SITE BOUNDARY location, in different sectors, of the highest calculated annual average ground level D/Q One sample from the vicinity of a community having a highest calculated annual average ground-level D/Q; and One sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 kin distant and in the least prevalent wind direction.

Particulate Sampler Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change (4).Gamma isotopic analysis(5) of composites (by location)quarterly.

Page 47 of 158 M M -M M M-- M M M M M m M MM m =Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCYOFANALYSIS

3. WATERBORNE

a. Surface(6)One sample upstream One sample downstream One sample outfall One sample cross-stream Grab sample monthly Gamma isotopic analysis(5) monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly.

b. Ground c. Drinking (if)d. Sediment Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be affected~8).One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its discharge One sample from downstream area One sample from cross-stream area One sample from outfall area One sample from upstream area One sample from a control location One sample from shoreline location Monthly Composite sample over two-week period(7) when 1-131 analysis is performed; monthly composite otherwise.

Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis(5) monthly and tritium analysis quarterly.

1- 131 analysis on each composite when the dose calculated for the consumption of the water is greater than 1 mrem per year(9). Composite for gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis(5) monthly Composite for tritium analysis quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis(5) semiannually Page 48 of 158

= M M M M " M M M mm M M M MM Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (I)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 4. INGESTION a. Milk Samples from milking animals in three locations within 5 km distance having the highest dose potential.

If there are none, then, one sample from milking animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per yr'9 .One sample from milking animals at a control location 15 to 30 km distant.One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge.

Semimonthly when animals are on pasture, monthly at other time Gamma isotopic (5) and 1-131 analysis semi-monthly when animals are on pasture; monthly at other times b. Fish and Invertebrates Sample in season, or Gamma isotopic analysis(5) on semiannually if they are not edible portions.seasonal Page 49 of 158 M- M --M M M M m M M M M W M M mm =Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS

(")SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF-ANALYSIS

c. Food Products One sample of each principal class of food products from any area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged Samples of three different kinds of broad leaf grown nearest each of two different offsite locations of highest predicted annual ground level D/Q if milk sampling is not performed.

One sample of each similar broadleaf vegetation grown 15 to 30 kmn distant in the least prevalent wind direction of milk sampling is not performed.

At time of harvest (10)Gamma isotopic analysis (5) on edible portion.Monthly during growing season Gamma isotopic analysis (5) on edible portion.Monthly during growing season Gamma isotopic analysis (5) on edible portion.Page 50 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the midpoint of a line between the center of the Salem units 1 & 2 containment domes, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12-1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability and malfunction of automatic sampling equipment.

If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period.All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, submit in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.(2) One or more instruments, such as pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters.

For the purposes of this table, a Passive Dosimeter (PD), a device meeting the criteria of ANSI N545 is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters.

Film badges shall not be used for measuring direct radiation.

The frequency of analysis or readout will depend upon the characteristics of the specific dosimetry system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. The number of direct radiation monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical limitations; e.g., at an ocean site, some sectors will be over water so that the number of dosimeters may be reduced accordingly.

(3) There are four additional air sample locations

-a "duplicate" air sampler at location 5S2, 5D1, 1F11 and 2F6 which are maintained for their historical data.(4) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, ganmna isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.(5) Ganmma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of ganmma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.Page 51 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION I (6) The "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge.

The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone. "Upstream" samples in an estuary must be taken far enough upstream to be beyond the plant influence.

Saltwater shall be sampled only when the receiving water is utilized for recreational activities.

(7) A composite sample is one which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short relative to the compositing period in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.(8) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for contamination.

(9) The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group using the I methodology and parameters in the ODCM. There are no farms that meet the 5 km requirement and it is unlikely that any releases from the site will approach the I mrem criteria at 5 to 8 kin. Milk samples will be taken (owner obliging) within 8 km and other management audit samples within 16 km. Broad leaf vegetation (within 8 kin) shall be taken to meet this pathway.(10) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products.

The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged.

However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations.

(11) No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However for management audit, one raw and one treated ground water sample from the nearest unaffected water supply is required.I Page 52 of 158

=m n m -n n -n m m m- M M MM Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet)H-3 3 x 10 4 Mn-54 1 X 10 3 3 x 10 4 Fe-59 4 x 10 2 1 X 104 Co-58 1 X 103 3 x 10 4 Co-60 3 x 102 1 x 10 4 Zn-65 3 x 102 2 x 104 Zr-Nb-95 4 x 102 1-131 20 0.9 3 1x 10 2 Cs-134 30 10 1x10 3 60 1 x 10 3 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 10 3 70 2x10 3 Ba-La-140 2 x 10 2 3 x 102 Page 53 of 158 M-m m m -M- m --M- -M M M n Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(')

(2)LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD)(3)Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry)gross 4 1 x 10-2 beta H-3 3000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58,60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 1-131 10 7 x 10-2 1 60 Cs-134 15 5 x 10-2 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 6 x 10-2 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15 Page 54 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered.

Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.(2) Required detection capabilities for dosimeters used for enviromnental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13.(3) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

LLD =4.66*Sb E

V

2.22 e Y o exp(-AAt)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as picocuries per unit mass or volume), 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1301 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute), E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration), V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume), 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable), k is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-'), and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting (sec).Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

For low count rates, a value of 2.71 may be added to the numerator Page 55 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued) i TABLE NOTATION___ I It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions.

Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable.

In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 56 of 158!

Salem ODCM Rev. 27 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS CONTROLS 3.12.2. hI accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.2, a land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden*of greater than 50 m 2 (500 ft 2) producing broad leaf vegetation.

[For elevated releases as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.111, Revision 1, July 1977, the Land Use Census shall also identify within a distance of 5 km (3 miles) the locations in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of all milk animals and all gardens of greater than 50 m2 producing broad leaf vegetation.]

APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8.b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1, add the new location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days.The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census was conducted.

Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).

c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be perfoirmed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Q in lieu of the garden census. CONTROLS for broadleaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12-1.4c shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.Page 57 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS (Cont'd)SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, visual survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities.

The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Envirornental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 58 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.3 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.3, analyses shall be perforned on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program that has been approved by the Commission, that correspond to samples required by Table 3.12-1.APPLICABILITY:

At all times.ACTION: a. With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4. are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCM. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Enviroinental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.Page 59 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 BASES FOR SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTE The BASES contained in the succeeding pages summarize the reasons for the CONTROLS of Sections 3.0 and 4.0, but are not considered a part of these CONTROLS.Page 60 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents.

The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.CROSS REFERENCE

-TABLES 3.3-12 and 4.3-12 Unit 1: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross 1R18 Activity lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1R19A, B, C, and D(.Gross Activity 2a Containment Fan Coolers Service 1 R13A and B(1" Water Line Discharge Gross Activity Unit 2: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross 2R18 Activity lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line 2R19A,B,C, Gross Activity and D"'2a Containment Fan Coolers -Service 2R13A and B(" Water Line Discharge Gross Activity 2b Chemical Waste Basin Line Gross R37 Activity (1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's"Minimum Channels Operable" requirement.

Page 61 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents.

The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.CROSS REFERENCE

-TABLES 3.3-13 and 4.3-13 Unit 1: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Waste Gas Holdup System 1R41A and D (I)(2)Noble Gas Activity 2a Containment Purge and 1R12A Pressure -Vacuum Relief or Noble Gas Activity IR41A and D (I)(2)3a Plant Vent Header System IR41A and D (1)(21 Noble Gas Activity 3b Plant Vent Header System IRME 4,5 (1R41)Iodine Sampler (3) or 1XT8911 (1R45)3c Plant Vent Header System IRME 4, 5 (1R41)Particulate Sampler (3) or 1XT8911 (1R45)I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I (1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel"Minimum Channels Operable" requirement.

(2) IR41D is the setpoint channel. IR41A is the measurement channel.for the ODCM's (3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded.

Alan-i/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components.

Page 62 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES Unit 2: T/S Table Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Item No. Channels I a Waste Gas Holdup System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D(1)(21 2a Containment Purge and Pressure -Vacuum Relief 2R12A or 2R41A Noble Gas Activity and D"1(21 3a Plant Vent Header System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D' 1)12)3b Plant Vent Header System Iodine Sampler (3) RME 4, 5 (2R41)or 2XT8911 (2R45)3c Plant Vent Header System Particulate Sampler (3) 2RME 4, 5 (2R41)or 2XT8911 (2R45)(1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's "Minimum Channels Operable" requirement, (2) 2R41D is the setpoint channel. 2R41A is the measurement channel.(3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded.

Alanr/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components.

Page 63 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 *3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION The CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid I waste effluents will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(a) to the population.

The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). 3 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, and IV.A of I Appendix I. 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." Also, for freshwater sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculations in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that confornnance with the guides of 3 Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated.

The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual 3 release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, 3 October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purposes of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.The CONTROL applies to the release of liquid effluents from each reactor at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are proportioned among the units sharing that system. I Page 64 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable".

This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section 11.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth the Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents.

3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 [10 CFR Part 20.106(b)].

For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the individual will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY.

Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC with the appropriate occupancy factors shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 mrem/year to the whole body and 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year.

This CONTROL applies to the release of gaseous effluents from all reactors at the site.3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be Page 65 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES substantially underestimated.

The dose calculations established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 3 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for detennining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions.

3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE 133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM 3 This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the I guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCM calculational methods specified in Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that I conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated.

The ODCM calculational methods for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977.These equations also provide for determining the actual dose based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions.

The release rate controls for iodine- 131, iodine 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways to man in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY.

The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2)deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3)deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objectives given in Section 11.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section Ii.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.

Page 66 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have now been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 by 46 FR 18525 as well as the dose limitations specific to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104.Over the long term, as more storage casks are placed on the ISFSI pads, it is expected that ISFSI operations will become the prominent contributor to the dose limits in this section. ISFSI dose contribution is in the form of direct radiation as no liquid or gas releases are expected to occur. The PSEG 10 CFR 72.212 Report prepared in accordance with 10 CFR 72 requirements assumes a certain array of casks exists on the pads. The dose contribution from this array of casks in combination with historical uranium fuel cycle operations prior to ISFSI operations was analyzed to be within the 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 limits. The CONTROL requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from plant including the ISFSI radioactive effluents exceed 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor units including outside storage tanks, etc. are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 limits. For purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered.

If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 and 10 CFR Part 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 until NRC staff action is completed.

The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in CONTROLS 3.11.1 and 3.11.2. An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.Page 67 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING U 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM I The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this CONTROL provides measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation.

This monitoring program implementsSection IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

The initial specified monitoring program will be effective for at least the first three years of comm-ercial operation.

Following tlhis period, program changes may be initiated based oin operational experience.

The required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses are tabulated in tenrs of lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLDs required by table 4.12-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories.

It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

Detailed discussion if the LLD, and other detection limits, can be found in Currie, L.A., "Lower Limit of Detection:

Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the HASL procedures Manual, HASL-300.3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door survey, aerial survey or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50m1 2 provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: 1) 20% of the garden was 2I used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) yield of 2 kg/m 2.3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM This requirement for participation in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for envirolnmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are reasonably valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.Page 68 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES Page 69 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES 5.1 SITE 5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1-3. (Provided FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Technical Specifications Section 5.0 is controlling.)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I!I I Page 70 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FIGURE 5.1-3: AREA PLOT PLAN OF SITE i!-cn C-0 CDC%LU.~.. -*I I.-.I I I I I-c LUJ L-L hi I'I LII"--=--'IF-(L I ~CD SECURITY FENC I-------------------

-i i i*LLI=L-)LLI=C F- n-------=L E -aWf-uPBc LLiZ-)---I =0a. *L-J ,)CLpM)pE iRIVER Page 71 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 6.9.1.7 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7, The Annual N Radiological Environmental Operating Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. 3 The Annual Radiological Enviromnental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies with operational controls (as appropriate), and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment.

The reports shall also include the results of land use 3 censuses required by CONTROL 3.12.2. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all measurements taken during the period pursuant to the Table and Figures in the enviromnental radiation section of the3 ODCM; as well as summarized and tabulated results of locations specified in these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.The reports shall also include the following:

a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps, one covering sampling locations near the SITE I BOUNDARY and a second covering the more distant locations, all keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the midpoint of a line between the centers of Salem units 1 & 2 containment domes; the results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, required by I CONTROL 3.12.1; and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 4.12-1 was not achievable.

6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.8 In accordance with Salem Units l and 2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.8, The Annual I Radiological Effluent Release Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May I of each year and in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.36a.

I The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21."Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those I sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.Page 72 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued)

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing of magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured), or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability.

The report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. The report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1-3) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments (i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location) shall be included in these reports. The historical annual average meteorology or the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents (as determined by sampling frequency and measurement) shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall identify those radiological environmental sample parameters and locations where it is not possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In addition, the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples should be identified.

The report should also include a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation) for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Enviromnental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation and 10 CFR 72.104, Criteria for Radioactive Materials in Effluents and Direct Radiation from an ISFSI or MRS. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, October 1977.The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period: a. Container volume, b. Total curie quantity (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), d. Source of waste and processing employed (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, evaporator bottoms), e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde).

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a list of descriptions of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.Page 73 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued)

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP), the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), or radioactive waste systems. Also list new locations identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2. for dose calculations or environmental monitoring.

6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 6.15.1 Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste system (liquid, gaseous and solid): I. Shall be reported to the Commission in the UFSAR for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC). The discussion of each change shall contain: a. A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with 10CFR50.59;

b. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information;

c. A detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;d. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid I waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;e. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to individual in the unrestricted area and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments I thereto;f. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and I gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made;g. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and 3 h. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the PORC.2. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the PORC.I Page 74 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES Page 75 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Salem Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g I and ODCM CONTROLS are summarized as follows: 1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination)

-l-R18 (Unit 1) and 2-R18 (Unit 2) provide the alarm I and automatic termination of liquid radioactive material releases as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.l-R19 A, B, C, and D provide the alarm and isolation function for the Unit 1 steam generator blowdown lines. 2-R19 A, B, C, and D provide this function for Unit 2.2) Alarm (only) -The alarm functions for the Service Water System are provided by the radiation monitors on the Containment Fan Cooler discharges (1R 13 A and B for Unit 1 and 2R 13 A and B for Unit 2).Releases from the secondary system are routed through the Chemical Waste Basin where the I effluent is monitored (with an alarm function) by R37 prior to release to the environment.

Liquid radioactive release flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented as Figures 1-1 and 1-2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively.

The Liquid Radioactive Waste System is presented in Figure 1-3. 3 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8, alarm setpoints shall be established for the liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of ODCM 3 CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, (Appendix F) for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 [LCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases).The following equation*

must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions:

3 C! C(F + f)f Where: C = the effluent concentration limit of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 implementing the 10 3 CFR 20 MPC (Appendix F) for the site, in [tCi/ml c = the setpoint, in ptCi/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, Page 76 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 represents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20 (Appendix F) in the UNRESTRICTED AREA f = the flow rate at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but in the same units as F, below F = the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit time[Note that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), then (F+ f) = F.]* Adapted from NUREG-0133

1.2.1 Liquid

Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service Water.The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station are determined by the following equations:

SP <[MPCe*SEN*CW*C

+ug (1.2)RR with: Z Ci (gamma only)MPCe = (1.3)Ci (gamma only )Z MPC.Where: SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)MPCe = an effective MPC value for the mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides in the effluent stream (.tCi/ml)Ci = the concentration of radionuclide i in the undiluted liquid effluents (pCi/ml)MPCi = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) (piCi/ml)SEN = the sensitivity value to which the monitor is calibrated (cpm per .Ci/ml)CW = the circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at th e time of release (gal/min)RR = the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)bkg = the background of the monitor (cpm)CF = Correction factor to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides in setpoint calculations.

AF = an allocation factor applicable for steam generator blowdown The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the circulating water dilution is potentially at its lowest value. Reduction of the waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to meet the discharge criteria.

However, in order to maximize the Page 77 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 available plant discharge dilution and thereby minimize the potential offsite doses, batch releases from either Unit-i or Unit-2 may be routed to either the Unit-i or Unit-2 Circulating Water System discharge.

Procedural restrictions prevent simultaneous batch releases from either a single unit or both units into a single Circulating Water System discharge.

1.2.2 Conservative

Default Values Conservative alarm setpoints may be determined through the use of default parameters.

Tables 1 -1.1 and 1-1.2 summarize all current default values in use for Salem Unit-i and Unit-2, respectively.

They are based upon the following:

a) substitution of the effective MPC value with a default value of 6.05E-06 pCi/ml (Unit 1) and 4.81E-06 pCi/ml (Unit 2). (refer to Appendix A for justification);

b) for additional conservatism*, substitution of the 1-131 MPC value of 3E-07 [tCi/ml for the R19 Steam Generator Blowdown monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and the R- 13 Service Water monitors;c) for conservatism, use of an allocation factor of 0.5 for the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors to limit consequences of potential simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks in two steam generators.**

The allocation factor equals 1.0 for all liquid effluent setpoints; I d) substitutions of the operational circulating water flow with the lowest flow, in gal/min;***

e) substitutions of the effluent release rate with the highest allowed rate, in gal/min; and, f) substitution of a Correction factor of 0.75 to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides.For batch liquid releases a fixed alann setpoint is established for the 1, 2 R18 monitors and the release rate is controlled to ensure the inequality of equation 1.1 is maintained.

With this approach, values I selected for the parameters in the setpoint calculation (e.g., Table 1-1.1 and Table 1-1.2) should be any set of reasonable values that provide a setpoint value reasonably above anticipated monitor response, plus background, so as not to yield spurious alarms. The release rate is controlled to ensure compliance I with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.Calculations, as performed by Engineering, to establish the actual fixed setpoints for use in the plant, I incorporate uncertainties and instrument drift. These factors will cause the actual installed instrument setpoint to be at a lower (conservative) value. However, for batch releases, when the rate is controlled, these uncertainties and drift should not be included in the evaluation of acceptable release rate, since this could cause a non-conservative correction, i.e., a higher allowable release rate. Therefore, for 1, 2 RI 8 monitors, the setpoint value used for calculating the allowable release rate should be that value prior to correction for uncertainty and drift.Based upon the potential for 1-131 to be present in the secondary and service water systems, the use of the default effective MPC (MPCe) value as derived in Appendix A may be non-conservative for the 1, 2 R-19 SGBD monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and the R-13 Service Water monitors.**Setpoints using the Allocation Factor of 0.5 become invalid if primary-to-secondary leaks are identified in more than two steam generators simultaneously.

- - The Containment Fan Coil Unit Discharge to Service Water Line is routed to the opposite Unit's Circulating Water System discharge.

Therefore, during periods when circulating Page 78 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 water pumps are out of service, such as during refueling outages, the default setpoints of the other Unit's R13 radiation monitors are not valid.1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Circulating Water System) to less than the concentrations as specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) for radionuclides other than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2.OE-04 .tCi/ml.Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established as addressed above to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded.

However, in the event any liquid release results in an alarmn setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 may be performed using the following equation:__C RR~IcL* CW+RR 1 1 MP -- ) --(1.4)Where: Ci -actual concentration of radionuclide i as measured in the undiluted liquid effluent (pCi/ml)MPC the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (pCi/ml) [ODCM Appendix F]2E-04 tCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases RR the actual liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)CW the actual circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of the release (gal/min)1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation

-10 CFR 50 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents.

ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each unit of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station to:-during any calendar quarter;< 1.5 mrem to total body per unit< 5.0 mrem to any organ per unit-during any calendar year;< 3.0 mrem to total body per unit< 10.0 mrem to any organ per unit.Page 79 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Per the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 4.11.1.2, the following calculational methods shall be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from Salem: Do 1.67E-02*VOL

Y(Ci*Aio)

CW i (1.5)Where: Do = dose or dose commitment to organ o (mrem). Total body dose can also be calculated using site-related total body dose commitment factor.Aio = site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ o for radionuclide i (mrem/hr per pCi/ml)Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL ([aCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Aio) are presented in Table 1-2 and have been derived in accordance with the requirements ofNUREG-0 133 by the equation: I I I I I!I i I I I i I A io =1. 14E ++/-05 *[(UI

Bl)+ (UF* BF i+ DF i (1.6)Where: Aio= composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ o of an adult for radionuclide i, for the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways (mremihr per pCi/ml)UI -adult invertebrate consumption (5 kg/yr)BIi = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in invertebrates from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1)UF = adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr)BFj = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in fish from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1)DFio = dose conversion factor for nuclide i for adults in pre-selected organ, o, from Table E-1 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (mrem/pCi) 1.14E+05 = conversion factor (pCi/jtCi

nil/kg per br/yr)The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4,11.1.2 are those as identified by gammna spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.1.1, Table 4.11-1.Radionuclides requiring radiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will be added to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the required minimum analysis frequency of ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.Page 80 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation.

In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented in Section 1.4.1, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2. (Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)Total Body 1.21E + 03

VOL (7 D~b

C (1.7)Maximum Organ 2.52E + 04

VOL Di max -Ci CW l(*8 Where: Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (.tCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)Dtb = conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem)Dmna. = conservatively evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem)1.21E+03 = conversion factor (hr/min) and the total body dose conversion factor (Fe-59, total body-- 7.27E+04 mrerm/hr per laCi/ml)2.52E+04 = conversion factor (hr/min) and the conservative maximum organ dose conversion factor (Nb-95, GI-LLI -- 1.5 1E+06 mrem/hr per pCi/ml)1.5 Secondary Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents and Dose Calculations During Primary to Secondary Leakage During periods of primary to secondary leakage (i.e., steam generator tube leaks), radioactive material will be transmitted from the primary system to the secondary system. The potential exists for the release of radioactive material to the off-site enviromnnent (Delaware River) via secondary system discharges.

Potential releases are controlled/monitored by the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors (R19) and the Chemical Waste Basin monitor (R37).However to ensure compliance with the regulatory limits on radioactive material releases, it may be desirable to account for potential releases from the secondary system during periods of primary to secondary leakage. Any potentially significant releases will be via the Chemical Waste Basin with the major source of activity being the Steam Generator Blowdown.With identified radioactive material levels in the secondary system, appropriate samples should be collected and analyzed for the principal gamma emitting radionuclides.

Based on the identified Page 81 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental doses may be calculated based on equation (1.5).Because the release rate from the secondary system is indirect (e.g., SG blowdown is normally routed to condenser where the condensate clean-up system will remove much of the radioactive material), samples should be collected from the release point (i.e., Chemical Waste Basin) for quantifying the radioactive material releases.

However, for conservatism and ease of controlling and quantifying all potential release paths, it is prudent to sample the SG blowdown and to assume all radioactive material is released directly to the environment via the Chemical Waste Basin. This approach while not exact is conservative and ensures timely analysis for regulatory compliance.

Accounting for radioactive material retention of the condensate clean-up system ion exchange resins may be needed to more accurately account for actual releases.In addition to the secondary releases described in this section, the Salem Ground Water Remediation System also can potentially discharge radioactive material to the Chemical Waste Basin. To ensure regulatory compliance, the releases are monitored by Radiation Monitor R-37. Samples are also collected, and analyzed for radionuclides.

Based on the identified radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental doses may be calculated based on equation (1.5). I 1.6 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.3 requires that the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the monthly projected doses exceed:-0.06 mrem to the total body, or-0.2 mrem to any organ.The applicable liquid waste processing system for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA is the ion exchange system as delineated in Figure 1-3. Alternately, the waste evaporator as presented in the Salem FSAR has processing capabilities meeting the NRC ALARA design requirements and may be used in conjunction or in lieu of the ion exchange system for waste processing requirements in accordance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.3.

These processing requirements are applicable to each unit individually.

Exceeding the projected dose requiring processing prior to release for one unit does not in itself dictate processing requirements for the other unit.2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls I The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and ODCM CONTROLS are summarized as follows: 1) Waste Gas Holdup System -The vent header gases are collected by the waste gas holdup system. I Gases may be recycled to provide cover gas for the CVCS hold-up tank or held in the waste gas tanks for decay prior to release. Waste gas decay tanks are batch released after sampling and analysis.

The Page 82 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 tanks are discharged via the Plant Vent. l-R41D provides noble gas monitoring and automatic isolation of waste gas decay tank releases for Unit-1. This function is provided by 2-R41 D for Unit-2.2) Containnent Purge and Pressure/Vacuum Relief -containment purges and pressure/vacuum reliefs are released to the atmosphere via the respective unit Plant Vent. Noble gas monitoring and auto isolation function are provided by 1 -R4 1 D for Unit-I and 2-R41 D for Unit-2. Additionally, in accordance with ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, Table 3.3-13, I-Rl2A and 2-R12A may be used to provide the containment monitoring and automatic isolation function during purge and pressure/vacuum reliefs (*).3) Plant Vent -The Plant Vent for each respective unit receives discharges from the waste gas hold-up system, condenser evacuation system, containment purge and pressure/vacuum reliefs, and the Auxiliary Building ventilation.

Effluents are monitored by R41D, a flow through gross activity monitor (for noble gas monitoring).

Radioiodine and particulate sampling capabilities are provided by charcoal cartridge and filter medium samplers.

Additionally, back-up sampling capability for radioiodine and particulates is provided at the 1 -R45 and 2-R45 sampling skids. Plant Vent flow rate is measured and as a back-up may be determined empirically as a function of fan operation (fan curves). Sampler flow rates are determined by flow rate instrumentation (e.g., venturi rotameter).

Gaseous radioactive effluent flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented in Figures 2-1. A simplified diagram of the Gaseous radioactive waste disposal system is provided in Figure 2-2.* The R12A in Mode 6 provides containment monitoring and alarm functions without automatic isolation Page 83 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 I 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination I 2.2.1 Containment and Plant Vent Monitor Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous I effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases does not exceed the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1, which corresponds to a dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY of 500 mrernlyear to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin.Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., grab sample of the Containment atmosphere, waste gas decay tank, or Plant Vent), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be established by the following calculation method. The measured radionuclide concentrations and release rate are used to calculate the fraction of the allowable release rate, as limited by Specification 3.11.2.1, by the equation: FR4C =04.72E +02 * *V (Ci*Ki)]1500 (2.1) I F 1 I FRA C =L4.72E+ 02 *%

VF Z(Ci *(Li +l.IMi))j3000 (2.2)Where: I FRAC = fraction of the allowable release rate based on the identified radionuclide concentrations and the release flow rate= annual average meteorological dispersion to the controlling site boundary location (sec/mi 3)VF = ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (ft 3/min)I Ci = concentration of noble gas radionuclide i as detenriined by radioanalysis of grab sample (ptCi/cm 3)Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mremr/yr per ýtCi/m 3 from Table 2-1) I Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [tCi/mn 3 from Table 2-1)Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mremlyr per pCi/mi 3 from Table 2-1)1.1 = mrem skin dose per inrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) 500 = total body dose rate limit (mremlyr)3000 = skin dose rate limit (mrernlyr) 4.72 E+02 = conversion factor (cmn 3/ft 3

rain/sec)Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher value) as determined above, the alarm setpoints for the applicable monitors (R41 D, and/or R12A) may be calculated by the equation: Page 84 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 SP=[AF* FRAC +bkg (2.3)Where: SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)SEN = monitor sensitivity (cpm per pCi/cm 3)bkg = background of the monitor (cpm)AF = administrative allocation factor for the specific monitor and type release, which corresponds to the fraction of the total allowable release rate that is administratively allocated to the release.The allocation factor (AF) is an administrative control imposed to ensure that combined releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will not exceed the regulatory limits on release rate from the site (i.e., the release rate limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1).

Normally, the combined AF value for Salem Units 1 and 2 is equal to 0.5 (0.25 per unit), with the remainder

0.5 allocated

to Hope Creek.Any increase in AF above 0.5 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station will be coordinated with the Hope Creek Generating Station to ensure that the combined allocation factors for all units do not exceed 1.0.2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust the setpoint to reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm setpoint may be conservatively determined by the default values presented in Table 2-2.1 and 2-2.2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively.

These values are based upon:-the maximum ventilation (or purge) flow rate;-a radionuclide distributiona comprised of 95% Xe-133, 2% Xe-135, 1% Xe-133m, 1% Kr-88 and 1% Kr-85; and-an administrative allocation factor of 0.25 to conservatively ensure that any simultaneous releases from Salem Units I and 2 do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate. For this radionuclide distribution, the alarm setpoint based on the total body dose rate is more restrictive than the corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate.a) Adopted fiom ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, Source Term Specifications, Table 6 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations

-10 CFR 20 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a limits the dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY due to noble gas releases to <500 mrern/yr, total body and <3000 mrer/lyr, skin. Radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded.

In the event any gaseous releases from the station results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of the SITE BOUNDARY dose rate resulting from the release shall be performed using the following equations:

Page 85 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1 Db = ZQ * (Ki

Q) (2.4)and D, ' Q*j((Li+1.lMi)*Qi)

(2.5)I Where: I Dtb = total body dose rate (mrem/yr)D, = skin dose rate (mrem/yr)'/ /Q =tthSTEBUDR loain(c/3)

= atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/rn.I Qi = average release rate of radionuclide i over the release period under evaluation (pCi/sec)Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per laCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mnrem/yr per ýtCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per [tCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)1.1 = rnrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mreln/mrad)

As appropriate, simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will be considered in evaluating compliance with the release rate limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a, following any release exceeding the above prescribed alarm setpoints.

Monitor indications (readings) may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 15 minutes when determining noble gas release rate based on correlation of the monitor reading and monitor sensitivity.

I The 15-minute averaging is needed to allow for reasonable monitor response to potentially changing radioactive material concentrations and to exclude potential electronic spikes in monitor readings that may be unrelated to radioactive material releases.

As identified, any electronic spiking monitor I responses may be excluded from the analysis.NOTE: For administrative purposes, more conservative alarm setpoints than those as prescribed above may be imposed. However, conditions exceeding these more limiting alarm setpoints do not necessarily indicate radioactive material release rates exceeding the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a.

Provided actual releases do not result in I radiation monitor indications exceeding alarm setpoint values based on the above criteria, no further analyses are required for demonstrating compliance with the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a.

Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3 may be used for evaluating the gaseous effluent dose I rate.I Page 86 of 158,.

Salem ODCM Rev. 27 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.b limits the dose rate to <1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-131, tritium, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period (e.g., nominally once per 7 days). The following equation shall be used for the dose rate evaluation:

D, : (Rio Q) (2.6)Where: Do, = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr)YQ = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location for the inhalation pathway (sec/in 3)Rio, = dose parameter for radionuclide i (mrern/yr per ptCi/m 3) and organ o for the child inhalation pathway from Table 2-4 Qi = average release rate over the appropriate sampling period and analysis frequency for radionuclide i -- 1-131, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days ([tCi/sec)

By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for D 0 and solving for Q, an allowable release rate for 1-131 can be determined.

Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (see Table 2-3) and the most limiting potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation, child, thyroid -- Rio = 1.62E+07 mrem/yr per pCi/m 3), the allowable release rate for 1-131 is 42 ýtCi/sec.

Reducing this release rate by a factor of 4 to account for potential dose contributions from other radioactive particulate material and other release points (e.g., Hope Creek), the corresponding release rate allocated to each of the Salem units is 10.5 VCi/sec.For a 7 day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for 1-131, the cumulative release is 6.3 Ci. Therefore, as long as the 1-131 releases in any 7 day period do not exceed 6.3 Ci, no additional analyses are needed for verifying compliance with the ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 .b limits on allowable release rate.2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations

-10 CFR 50 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2 requires a periodic assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of<5 mrad, gamma-air and <10 mrad, beta-air and the calendar year limits <10 rnrad, gamma-air and <20 mrad, beta-air.

The limits are applicable separately to each unit and are not combined site limits. The following equations shall be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses: Dy = 3.17E -08*Z %Q*Z(Mi*Qi)

(2.7)i Page 87 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1 and D8 = 3.17E -08* Q * * (2.8)Where: Dy = air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad) I D13 = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)/ = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/mr 3)Qi = cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide i over the period of interest ([tCi) where pCi = ([tCi/cc)*(cc released) or (pCi/sec)*(sec released)Mi = air dose factor due to gamma emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per .tCi/mi 3 , from Table 2-1)= air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide I (mrad/yr per lICi/m 3 , Table 2-1)3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec)2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equations may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2. (Refer to Appendix C for the derivation and justification for this simplified method and for values of Meff, and NeIT..)Dy*3.17E-08 M//Q* Y,*Qi (2.9) I 0.50 /Q i and U D,8 3"1 7 E-8

_(2.10) U 0.50 N Where: I Mett = 5.3E+02, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per jiCi/m 3)Neff = 1.1 E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mnrad/yr per pCi/mi 3)Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (pCi), where pCi = (tCi/cc) * (cc released) or (pCi/sec)

(sec released)0.50 = conservatism factor to account for potential variability in the radionuclide distribution Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3, may be used for the evaluation of the gamma-air and I beta-air doses.I Page 88 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations

-10 CFR 50 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates In accordance with requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit of<7.5 mrem and calendar year limit<15 mrem to any organ. The following equation shall be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to releases of 1-131, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days: Daop = 3.17E-08

W

SFp* Z(Riop

Qi)Where: Daop = dose or dose commitment via all pathways p and controlling age group a (as identified in Table 2-3) to organ o, including the total body (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2-3= atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other YQ pathways (sec/mi 3)D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (m-2)Riop = dose factor for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [Ci/m 3) or (in 2 -mrern/yr per [tCi/sec)and organ o from Table 2-4 for each age group and the applicable pathway p as identified in Table 2-3. Values for Ri 0 p were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0 133.Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131, tritium, or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (pCi).SFp = annual seasonal correction factor to account for the fraction of the year that the applicable exposure pathway does not exist.1) For milk and vegetation exposure pathways: A six month fresh vegetation and grazing season (May through October) = 0.5 2) For inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways:

= 1.0 For evaluating the maximum exposed individual, only the controlling pathways and age group as identified in Table 2-3 need be evaluated for compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3.2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates.

In lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-13 1, tritium, and particulates) dose assessment for the resident/dairy location as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 (refer to Appendix D for the derivation and justification of this simplified method).Dmax = 3.17E- 08* W*SFp *t -131 *ZQ (2.12)i Page 89 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Where: I Dmax maximum organ dose (mrem)Ri-131 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway= 1.05E+12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling (mi 2 -mrem/yr per .tCi/sec)W = D/Q for radioiodine, 2.1 E-10 1 /mi 2 Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i 13 1, tritium, or radioactive material in particulate from with half life greater than 8 days (ýtCi)The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3. If more limiting exposure pathways are determined to exist in the surrounding enviromnent of Salem by the amnual land-use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2. I 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations I During periods of primary to secondary leakage, minor levels of radioactive material may be released via the secondary system to the atmosphere.

Non-condensables (e.g., noble gases) will be predominately released via the condenser evacuation system and will be monitored and quantified by the routine plant vent monitoring and sampling system and procedures (e.g., RI 5 on condenser evacuation, R41D on plant vent, and the plant vent particulate and charcoal samplers).

However, if the Steam Generator blowdown is routed directly to the Chemical Waste -Basin (via the SG blowdown flash tank) instead of being recycled through the condenser, it may be desirable to account for the potential atmospheric releases of radioiodines and particulates from the flash tank vent (i.e., releases due to moisture carry over). Since this pathway is not sampled or monitored, it is necessary to calculate potential releases.Based on the guidance in NRC NUREG-0133, the releases of the radioiodines and particulates shall be calculated by the equation: Qi=Ci*Rsgb*Fft*(I-SQftv)

(2.13)Where: Qj = the release rate of radionuclide, i, from the steam generator flash tank vent (.tCi/sec)

[Ci = the concentration of radionuclide, i, in the secondary coolant water averaged over not more than one week (jiCi/ml)Rsgb = the steam generator blowdown rate to the flash tank (ml/sec)Fft = the fraction of blowdown flashed in the tank determined from a heat balance taken around the flash tank at the applicable reactor power level I SQftvz the measured steam quality in the flash tank vent; or an assumed value of 0.85, based on NUREG-0017.

1 Tritium releases via the steam flashing may also be quantified using the above equation with the assumption of a steam quality (SQfiv) equal to 0. Since the H-3 will be associated with the water Page 90 of 158!

Salem ODCM Rev. 27 molecules, it is not necessary to account for the moisture carry-over which is the transport media for the radioiodines and particulates.

Based on the design and operating conditions at Salem, the fraction of blowdown converted to steam (Fft) is approximately 0.48. The equation simplifies to the following:

Qi = 0.072* Ci

Rgb (2.14)For H-3, the simplified equation is: Qi = 0.48

Ci

R&gb (2.15)Also during reactor shutdown operations with a radioactively contaminated secondary system, radioactive material may be released to the atmosphere via the atmospheric reliefs (PORV) and the safety reliefs on the main steam lines and via the steam driven auxiliary feed pump exhaust. The evaluation of the radioactive material concentration in the steam relative to that in the steam generator water is based on the guidance of NUREG-00 17, Revision 1. The partitioning factors for the radioiodines is 0.01 and is 0.005 for all other particulate radioactive material.

The resulting equation for quantifying releases via the atmospheric steam releases is: Qo = 0.13 * (C 0

SFo)* PFi (2.16)Where: Q'j = release rate of radionuclide i via pathway j,(ýtCi/sec)

Cij= concentration of radionuclide i, in pathway j,([tCi/ml)

SFj = steam flow for release pathway j= 400,000 lb/hr per PORV-850,000 lb/hr per safety relief valve= 62,500 lb/hr for auxiliary feed pump exhaust PFi = partitioning factor, ratio of concentration in steam to that in the water in the steam generator-0.01 for radioiodines

-0.005 for all other particulates

-1.0 for H-3 0.13 = conversion factor -[(hr*ml) / (sec*lb)]Any significant releases of noble gases via the atmospheric steam releases can be quantified in accordance with the calculation methods of the Salem Emergency Plan Implementation Procedure.

Alternately, the quantification of the release rate and cumulative releases may be based on secondary samples. The measured radionuclide concentration in the secondary system may be used for quantifying the noble gases, radioiodine and particulate releases.Page 91 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Note: The expected mode of operation would be to isolate the effected steam generator, thereby reducing the potential releases during the shutdown/cooldown process. Use of the above calculation methods should consider actual operating conditions and release mechanisms.

The calculated quantities of radioactive materials may be used as inputs to the equation (2.11) or (2.12)to calculate offsite doses for demonstrating compliance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and the ODCM CONTROLS.2.7 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires that the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM be used to reduce radioactive material levels prior to discharge when projected doses exceed one-half the annual design objective rate in any calendar month, i.e., exceeding:

0.2 mrad in air from gamma radiation, or* 0.4 mrad in air from beta radiation or,* 0.3 mrad to any organ to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC.The applicable gaseous processing systems for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the Auxiliary Building normal ventilation system (filtration systems # 1, 2 and 3) and the Waste Gas Decay Tanks as delineated in Figures 2-1 and 2-2. Dose projections are performed at least once per 31 days.Page 92 of 158 I I I I I I i I I I I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSES 3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY In accordance with ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.8, the Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall include an assessment of radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY.The calculation methods as presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 may be used for determining the maximum potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC located inside the site boundary.

For the purpose of this calculation, a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is an adult individual who is not subject to occupational exposure (i.e., an un-monitored site worker) perfonning duties within the site boundary, and who is exposed to radioactive material in gaseous effluent for 2,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months per year via the inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways.

The values for the atmospheric dispersion coefficients at the point of interest inside the site boundary (e.g., 0.25 mile) shall be developed from the current year meteorological data.3.2 Total dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall also include an assessment of the radiation dose to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC for reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including dose contributions from effluents and direct radiation from on-site sources).

For the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the vicinity of Artificial Island, the sources of exposure need only consider the Salem Nuclear Generating Station and the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station which includes the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI): No other fuel cycle facilities contribute to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC dose for the Artificial Island vicinity.The dose contribution from the operation of Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station will be estimated based on the methods as presented in the Hope Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (HCGS ODCM).As appropriate for demonstrating/evaluating compliance with the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.4 (40 CFR 190), the results of the environmental monitoring program may be used for providing data on actual measured levels of radioactive material in the actual pathways of exposure.3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations For purposes of implementing the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.4 and the reporting requirements of 6.9.1.8 (RERR), dose calculations for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station should be performed using the controlling pathways and locations of Table 2-3 and the calculation methods contained within this ODCM. If more limiting exposure pathways are determined to exist in the surrounding environment of Salem by the annual land-use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.Average annual meteorological dispersion parameters or meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period under evaluation may be used.Page 93 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 I 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination.

Any potentially significant direct exposure contribution to off-site individual doses may be evaluated based on the results of the environmental measurements (e.g., PD, ion chamber measurements) and/or by the use of a radiation transport and shielding calculation method.Only during a non-typical condition will there exist any potential for significant on-site sources at 3 Salem that would yield potentially significant off-site doses (i.e., in excess of I mrem per year to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC), that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104.However, should a situation exist where the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculation techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 compliance.

3.3 Doses

Due to Carbon 14 in Gaseous Effluents I Because gaseous effluent releases from a pressurized water reactor (PWR), such as the Salem Generating Station, can contain significant quantities of C-14 (i.e., approximately 5 to 7.3 curies annually -Regulatory Guide 1.21 rev 2), the NRC has recommended that licensees evaluate C-14 as a potential principal radionuclide for gaseous releases from their facility.

The results in an evaluation conducted in response to SAP Order 70096339 identified C-14 as a principal radionuclide in gaseous I effluent releases from the Salem Generating Station.3.3.1 Estimation of Carbon 14 in Annual Releases The methodology for estimating the quantity C-14 released annually from the Salem Generating Station incorporates the use of a normalized C-14 source term and a scaling factor based on power generation.

NCRP Report No. 81, Carbon-14 in the Environment, has been identified by the NRC as a source for scaling factors (refer to section 1.9 in Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.21). This approach is one of I three NRC-recommended methods for estimating the quantity of C-14 discharged in gaseous effluent (refer to Regulatory position 1.9 in Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.21). Electrical energy output value for the reporting period should be used to estimate the quantity of C-14 released.Page 94 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 3.3.2 Carbon 14 dose Determinations The methodology for determining doses from C-14 in gaseous releases incorporates dose models described in Regulatory Guide 1.109. Estimated C- 14 releases and average meteorological data for the reporting period should be used as input to the dose calculations.

The doses due to C-14 in gaseous releases are calculated for receptors located at and beyond the site boundary.

For doses at locations beyond the site boundaries, receptors shall be real individuals via active pathways as identified in the Annual Land Use Census. Doses due to C-14 in gaseous effluent and the assumptions used in the dose calculations shall be included in the annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1 Sampling Program The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is conducted in accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.12. The objectives of the program are:-To determine whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of radionuclides in the critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island;-To determine if the operation of the Salem Nuclear Generating Stations has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment;

-To detect any changes in the ambient gamnma radiation levels; and-To verify that SNGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

The sampling requirements (type of samples*, collection frequency and analysis) and sample locations are presented in Appendix E.*NOTE: No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly effected by liquid effluents discharged from Salem Generating Station.4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program ODCM CONTROL 3.12.3 requires analyses be performed on radioactive material supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program. Participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program provides a check on the precision and accuracy of measurements of radioactive materials in envirornuental samples.A summary of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program results will be provided in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.7.Page 95 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FIGURE 1-1: LIQUID RELEASE FLOWPATH UNIT 1 FROM VOLUME CONTROL TANKS TO VENTS TO CVCS#1 SPENT FUEL PIT DEMINERALIZER SAMPLING SYSTEM STEAM GENERATOR SAMPLING LINES UNIT 2 CROSS-CONNECT R18 MONITOR-I SERVICE WATER E CONTAINMENT FAN COIL UNITS GROUND WATER TO NON-RAD (C)REMEDIATION No (Figure 1-2)SYSTEM TO NON-RAD (B)(Figure 1-2)TO CIRCU ATING WATER SYSTEM R 13 MONITORS 4, To River Page 96 of 158 mnn- -mmm --m -Rev .mmm m Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FIGURE 1-2: LIQUID RELEASE FLOWPATH UNIT 2 FROM VOLUME CONTROL TANKS CVCS#1 SPENT FUEL PIT DEMINERALIZER SAMPLING L SYSTEM STEAM GENERATOR SAMPLING LINES UNIT I CROSS-CONNECT WATER FROM UNIT I (B)(Figure 1-1)NON-RAD LIQUID WASTE DISPOSAL CONTAINMENT FAN COIL UNITS t TO CIRCULATING T WATER SYSTEM FROM UNIT 1 (C) (Figure 1-1) c R 13 MONITORS Page 97 of 158

= --- M- -M--- M M-- M M M =Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FIGURE 1-3: LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE SYSTEM Page 98 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1 Parameter Actual Default Comments Value Value Units MPCe Calculated 6.05E-06

Ci/ml Calculated for each batch to be released.MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A LtCi/ml 1- 131 MPC conservatively used for SG blowdown and Service Water monitor setpoints.

Ci Measured N/A .Ci/ml Taken from ganmma spectral analysis of liquid effluent.MPCi as determined N/A pLCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 11, Col 2 (Appendix F).Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled l-R18 tpCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint 1-R19 (A,B,C,D)

Document (PSBP) 315733 1-R13 (A and B)CW as determined 1.00E+05 gpm Circulating water system -single CW pump ***RR as determined gpm Determined prior to release; release rate 1-R18 120 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL compliance 1-R19 250 Steam Generator blowdown rate per Generator l-R13 1.00 E +05 Service Water flow rate for Containment fan coolers Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under I-R 18 Public Service Blueprint Document 1-R19 (A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315733 1-R13 (A and B)**Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-(Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.Allocation Factor 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude 1-R19 exceeding MPC limit in the case of simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks at both Salem Units* Refer to Appendix A for derivation

- The MPC value of 1-131 (3E-07 p.Ci/ml) has been used for derivation of R19 Steam Generator Blowdown and R13 Service Water monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2** During periods when Unit 2 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for l-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.Page 99 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations

-Unit 2 Parameter Actual Default Units Value Value Comments MPCe Calculated 4.81E-06

pCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released.MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A pCi/ml 1-131 MPC conservatively used for SG blowdown, Service Water and Chemical Waste Basin monitor setpoints.

C, Measured N/A ptCi/ml Taken from ganmma spectral analysis of liquid effluent.MPCi as determined N/A PCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Col. 2 (Appendix F)Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled 2-RI8 pCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint Document 2R19(A,B,C,D) 315734 2-R13(A and B)R37 CW as determined 1.0E+05 gpm Circulating Water System, single CW pump ***RR as determined 120 gpm Determined prior to release; release rate 2-R18 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL Compliance 250 2-R19 Steam Generator Blowdown rate per Generator I.OE+05 2-R13 Circulating Water System, single CW 1200 Pump R37 Chemical Waste Basin discharge Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under 2-R18 Public Service Blueprint Document 2-R19(A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315734 2-R13(A and B)**R37 **Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-(Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.Allocation Factor 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude 2-R19 exceeding MPC limit in the case of simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks at both Salem Units* Refer to Appendix A for derivation

- The MPC value of 1-131 (3.OE-7 ttCi/ml) has been used for derivation of the R13, R19 and R37 monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2* ** During periods when Unit 1 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for 2-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.Page 100 of 158 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Aio (Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)(mrem/hr per pCi/ml)Nuld Bone Live T.od Th:Eo jjde LmG-H-3 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 C-14 1.45E+4 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 Na-24 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 P-32 4.69E+6 2.91E+5 1.81E+5 -5.27E+5 Cr-51 -5.58E+O 3.34E+O 1.23E+O 7.40E+O 1.40E+3 Mn-54 7.06E+3 1.35E+3 -2.1OE+3 2.16E+4 Mn-56 -1.78E+2 3.15E+1 -2.26E+2 5.67E+3 Fe-55 5.11E+4 3.53E+4 8.23E+3 --1.97E+4 2.03E+4 Fe-59 8.06E+4 1.90E+5 7.27E+4 --5.30E+4 6.32E+5 Co-57 -1.42E+2 2.36E+2 ---3.59E+3 Co-58 6.03E+2 1.35E+3 ---1.22E+4 Co-60 -1.73E+3 3.82E+3 ---3.25E+4 Ni-63 4.96E+4 3.44E+3 1.67E+3 ---7.18E+2 Ni-65 2.02E+2 2.62E+1 1.20E+1 ---6.65E+2 Cu-64 2.14E+2 1.01E+2 -5.40E+2 -1.83E+4 Zn-65 1.61E+5 5.13E+5 2.32E+5 -3.43E+5 -3.23E+5 Zn-69 3.43E+2 6.56E+2 4.56E+1 -4.26E+2 -9.85E+1 As-76 4.38E+2 1.16E+3 5.14E+3 3.42E+2 1.39E+3 3.58E+2 4.30E+4 Br-82 --4.07E+O -4.67E+O Br-83 --7.25E-2 --1.04E-1 Br-84 --9.39E-2 -7.37E-7 Br-85 --3.86E-3 -Rb-86 -6.24E+2 2.91E+2 -1.23E+2 Rb-88 -1.79E+O 9.49E-1 -2.47E-1 1 Rb-89 -1.19E+O 8.34E-I ---6.89E-14 Sr-89 4.99E+3 1.43E+2 ---8.OOE+2 Sr-90 1.23E+5 3.01E+4 ---3.55E+3 Sr-91 9.18E+1 3.71E+O ---4.37E+2 Sr-92 3.48E+1 -1.51E+O ---6.90E+2 Y-90 6.06E+O -1.63E-1 ---6.42E+4 Y-91 m 5.73E-2 -2.22E-3 ---1.68E-1 Y-91 8.88E+1 -2.37E+O ---4.89E+4 Y-92 5.32E-1 -1.56E-2 ---9.32E+3 Y-93 1.69E+O -4.66E-2 ---5.35E+4 Zr-95 1.59E+1 5.11E+O 3.46E+O -8.02E+O -1.62E+4 Zr-97 8.81E-1 1.78E-1 8.13E-2 -2.68E-I -5.51E+4 Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 -2.46E+2 -1.51E+6 Nb-97 3.75E+O 9.49E- 1 3.46E-I -1.11E+O -3.50E+3 Mo-99 -1.28E+2 2.43E+1 -2.89E+2 -2.96E+2 Tc-99m 1.30E-2 3.66E-2 4.66E-1 -5.56E-1 1.79E-2 2.17E+1 Tc-101 1.33E-2 1.92E-2 1.88E-1 -3.46E-1 9.81E-3 5.77E-14 Page 101 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE 1-2 (cont'd)Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Aio (Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)(mremlhr per pCi/ml)_i'd' K:. ,'r , Ru-103 1.07E+2 -4.60E+1 -4.07E+2 1.25E+4 Ru-105 8.89E+0 -3.51E+O -1.15E+2 5.44E+3 Ru-106 1.59E+3 -2.01E+2 -3.06E+3 1.03E+5 Rh-103m ---Rh-106 .....Ag-110n 1.56E+3 1.45E+3 8.60E+2 -2.85E+3 -5.91E+5 Sb-122 1.98E+1 4.55E-1 6.82E+O 3.06E-1 -1.19E+1 7.51E+3 Sb-124 2.77E+2 5.23E+O 1.10E+2 6.71E-1 -2.15E+2 7.86E+3 Sb-125 1.77E+2 1.98E+0 4.21E+1 1.80E-1 -1.36E+2 1.95E+3 Sb-126 1.14E+2 2.31E+0 4.1OE+l 6.96E-1 -6.97E+1 9.29E+3 Te-125m 2.17E+2 7.86E+1 2.91E+1 6.52E+1 8.82E+2 -8.66E+2 Te-127m 5.48E+2 1.96E+2 6.68E+1 1.40E+2 2.23E+3 -1.84E+3 Te-127 8.90E+O 3.20E+O 1.93E+0 6.60E+0 3.63E+1 -7.03E+2 Te-129m 9.3 1E+2 3.47E+2 1.47E+2 3.20E+2 3.89E+3 -4.69E+3 Te-129 2.54E+O 9.55E-1 6.19E-1 1.95E+O 1.07E+1 -1.92E+0 Te-131rn 1.40E+2 6.85E+1 5.71E+1 1.08E+2 6.94E+2 -6.80E+3 Te-131 1.59E+O 6.66E-1 5.03E-1 1.31E+O 6.99E+O -2.26E-1 Te-132 2.04E+2 1.32E+2 1.24E+2 1.46E+2 1.27E+3 -6.24E+3 1-130 3.96E+ I1 1.17E+2 4.61E+1 9.91E+3 1.82E+2 -1.01E+2 1-131 2.18E+2 3.12E+2 1.79E+2 1.02E+5 5.35E+2 -8.23E+1 1-132 1.06E+1 2.85E+1 9.96E+0 9.96E+2 4.54E+1 -5.35E+O 1-133 7.45E+1 1.30E+2 3.95E+1 1.90E+4 2.26E+2 -1.16E+2 1-134 5.56E+O 1.51E+1 5.40E+0 2.62E+2 2.40E+1 -1.32E-2 1-135 2.32E+1 6.08E+1 2.24E+1 4.01E+3 9.75E+1 -6.87E+1 Cs-134 6.84E+3 1.63E+4 1.33E+4 -5.27E+3 1.75E+3 2.85E+2 Cs-136 7.16E+2 2.83E+3 2.04E+3 -1.57E+3 2.16E+2 3.21E+2 Cs-137 8.77E+3 1.20E+4 7.85E+3 -4.07E+3 1.35E+3 2.32E+2 Cs-138 6.07E+O 1.20E+1 5.94E+0 -8.81E+O 8.70E-1 5.12E-5 Ba-139 7.85E+O 5.59E-3 2.30E-1 -5.23E-3 3.17E-3 1.39E+1 Ba- 140 1.64E+3 2.06E+O 1.08E+2 -7.02E- 1 1.18E+0 3.38E+3 Ba-141 3.81E+0 2.88E-3 1.29E-1 -2.68E-3 1.63E-3 1.80E-9 Ba-142 1.72E+O 1.77E-3 1.08E-1 -1.50E-3 1.OOE-3 2.43E-18 La-140 1.57E+O 7.94E-1 2.10E-1 --5.83E+4 La-142 8.06E-2 3.67E-2 9.13E-3 --2.68E+2 Ce-141 3.43E+O 2.32E+O 2.63E-1 -1.08E+O -8.86E+3 Ce-143 6.04E-1 4.46E+2 4.94E-2 -1.97E-1 -1.67E+4 Ce-144 1.79E+2 7.47E+1 9.59E+O -4.43E+1 -6.04E+4 Pr-143 5.79E+0 2.32E+0 2.87E-1 -1.34E+O -2.54E+4 Pr-144 1.90E-2 7.87E-3 9.64E-4 -4. 44E-3 -2.73E-9 Nd-147 3.96E+O 4.58E+O 2.74E-1 -2.68E+O -2.20E+4 W-187 9.16E+0 7.66E+O 2.68E+O -2.51E+3 Np-239 3.53E-2 3.47E-3 1.91E-3 -1.08E-2 7.11E+2 Page 102 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 1-3: Bioaccumulation Factors (pCi/kg per pCi/liter)*

H 9.OE-01 9.3E-01 C 1.8E+03 1.4E+03 Na 6.7E-02 1.9E-01 P 3.OE+03 3.OE+04 Cr 4.OE+02 2.OE+03 Mn 5.5E+02 4.OE+02 Fe 3.0E+03 2.OE+04 Co 1.OE+02 1.OE+03 Ni 1.OE+02 2.5E+02 Cu 6.7E+02 1.7E+03 Zn 2.OE+03 5.OE+04 As 3.3E+02 3.3E+02 Br 1.5E-02 3.1E+00 Rb 8.3E+00 1.7E+01 Sr 2.OE+00 2.OE+01 Y 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Zr 2.OE+02 8.0E+01 Nb 3.OE+04 1.OE+02 Mo 1.OE+01 1.OE+01 Tc 1.OE+01 5.0E+01 Ru 3.0E+00 1.OE+03 Rh 1.OE+01 2.OE+03 Ag 3.313+03 3.313+03 Sb 4.0E+01 5.4E+00 Te 1.0E+01 1.OE+02 I 1.0E+01 5.0E+01 CS 4.0E+01 2.5E+01 Ba 1.0E+01 1.0E+02 La 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Ce 1.0E+01 6.0E+02 Pr 2.5E+01 1.0E+03 Nd 2.5E+01 1.0E+03 W 3.OE+01 3.OE+01 Np 1.OE+01 1.OE+O 1* Values in this table are taken fiorn Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus (fish) which is adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver, arsenic and antimony which are taken from UCRL 50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.Page 103 of 158 Cl -I --- -,~ItlT. S I~ '%~~Salem UkL-IVI Kev. Z /FIGURE 2-1: SALEM VENTILATION EXHAUST SYSTEMS AND EFFLUENT MONITOR INTERFACES Simplified One Line I TO ATMOSPHERE lR41 SKID IDENSER R4SDi_ASTE _I GAS ECAY UCKS CONTAINMENT PRESSURE RELIEF UNIT i JEL ROUGH HEPA CHARCOAL SSURE FILTER FILTER FILTER:UCK!AY FUEL HANDLING EXH FILTER JEL UNIT SROUGH HEPA ICHARCOAL IDLING FILTER FILTER FILTER REA AUX BLDG EXH UNITS Page 104 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FIGURE 2-2: GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Simplified One Line Page 105 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-1: Dose Factors For Noble Gases Total Body Skin Garmna Air Beta Air Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Ki Li Mi Ni Radionuclide LtCi/m3) gCi/m3) LCi/m3) mtCi/m3)Kr-83m 7.56E-02 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.01 E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe- 131im 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11 E+03 Xe- 133m 2.51 E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135rn 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03 Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 Page 106 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-2.1: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setnoint Determinations

-Unit 1 Parameter Actual Default Units Comments Value Value X/Q calculated 2.2E-06 sec/m 3 USNRC Salem Safety Evaluation, Sup 3 VF as measured or (Plant Vent) fan curves 1.30E+05 ft 3/min Plant Vent -nornial operation (Cont Purge) 3.50E+04 Containment Purge AF coordinated 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor with HCGS to ensure combined releases do not exceed release rate limit for site.Ci measured N/A i.Ci/crn 3 Taken from gamma spectral analysis of gaseous effluent Ki nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1__Ci /M 3 Li nuclide specific N/A mrern/yr per Values from Table 2-1 iLCi/m3 Mi nuclide specific N/A mnrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1__tCi/m3 Sensitivities as deternmined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are I -R41 FiCi/m 3 or controlled under Public 1-R12A cpm per Service Blueprint Document pCi/cc (PSBP) 315733 Setpoint calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are 1 -R41D controlled under Public 1-R12A ** tCi/sec Service Blueprint Document (PSBP) 315733**Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6 Page 107 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations

-Unit 2 Parameter Actual Default Units Value Value Comments X/Q Calculated 2.2E-6 sec/mr 3 USNRC Salem Safety Evaluation, Sup 3 VF as measured or Plant Vent fan curves 1.30E+05 ft 3/min Plant Vent -normal operation Cont. Purge 3.50E+04 Contaimnent Purge AF Coordinated 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor with HCGS to ensure combined releases do not exceed release rate for site.C, Measured N/A pCi/cm 3 Taken from ganuna spectral analysis of gaseous effluent K, Nuclide N/A rnrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific jiCi/m 3 Nuclide N/A rnrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific [tCi/m 3 M, Nuclide N/A mnrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific pCi/m 3 Sensitivities as N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are 2-R41 determined tCi/mr 3 or controlled under Public Service 2-R12A cpm per Blueprint Document (PSBP)p.Ci/cc 315734 Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are controlled 2-R41D ytCi/sec under Public Service Blueprint 2-R12A ** Document (PSBP) 315734**Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6 Page 108 of 158 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathways and Atmospheric Dispersion for Dose Calculations

ODCM CONTROL Location Pathway(s)

Controlling Age Group Atmospheric Dispersion X/Q D/Q (sec/m3) (1/m2)3.11.2.1 a site boundary (0.83 mile, N)3.11.2.1b site boundary (0.83 mile, N)3.11.2.2 3.11.2.3 3.11.2.3 site boundary (0.83 mile, N)residence/dairy**

(4.9 miles, W)Residence/garden/

beef (4.6 mi, SW)**noble gases direct exposure Inhalation and ground plane gamnma-air beta-air milk, ground plane and inhalation Ground plane, inhalation, garden produce, meat ingestion N/A child N/A infant Child 2.2 E-06 2.2 E-06 2.2 E-06 5.4E-08 8.0 E-8 N/A N/A N/A 2.1 E-10 2.4 E-10* The identified controlling locations, pathways and atmospheric dispersion are from the Safety Evaluation Report, Supplement No. 3, for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 (NUREG-0157, December 1978)** Location and distance are determined from the performance of the annual land use census as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.Page 109 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases II II II R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mremn/yr per ýtCi/m3)H-3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 C-14 1.82E+4 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 P-32 1.32E+6 7.71E+4 ---8.64E+4 5.01E+4 Cr-51 -5.95E+l 2.28E+1 1.44E+4 3.32E+3 1.OOE+2 Mn-54 3.96E+4 -9.84E+3 1.40E+6 7.74E+4 6.30E+3 Fe-55 2.46E+4 1.70E+4 --7.21E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 --1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 -6.92E+2 --3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71E+2 Co-58 1.58E+3 --9.28E+5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3 Co-60 1.15E+4 --5.97E+6 2.85E+5 1.48E+4 Ni-63 4.32E+5 3.14E+4 --1.78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Zn-65 3.24E+4 1.03E+5 -6.90E+4 8.64E+5 5.34E+4 4.66E+4 Rb-86 1.35E+5 --1.66E+4 5.90E+4 Sr-89 3.04E+5 ---1.40E+6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 St-90 9.92E+7 ---9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.1OE+6 Y-91 4.62E+5 ---1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4 Zr-95 1.07E+5 3.44E+4 -5.42E+4 1.77E+6 1.50E+5 2.33E+4 Nb-95 1.41E+4 7.82E+3 -7.74E+3 5.05E+5 1.04E+5 4.21E+3 Ru-103 1.53E+3 --5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.1OE+5 6.58E+2 Ru-106 6.91E+4 --1.34E+5 9.36E+6 9.12E+5 8.72E+3 Ag- 110m 1.08E+4 1.OOE+4 -1.97E+4 4.63E+6 3.02E+5 5.94E+3 Sb-124 3.12E+4 5.89E+2 7.55E+1 -2.48E+6 4.06E+5 1.24E+4 Sb-125 5.34E+4 5.95E+2 5.40E+1 -1.74E+6 1.01E+5 1.26E+4 Te-125m 3.42E+3 1.58E+3 1.05E+3 1.24E+4 3.14E+5 7.06E+4 4.67E+2 Te-127m 1.26E+4 5.77E+3 3.29E+3 4.58E+4 9.60E+5 1.50E+5 1.57E+3 Te- 129m 9.76E+3 4.67E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+5 1.58E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1.19E+7 6.13E+4 -6.28E+3 2.05E+4 1-132 1.16E+3 3.26E+3 1.14E+5 5.18E+3 -4.06E+2 1.16E+3 1-133 8.64E+3 1.48E+4 2.15E+6 2.58E+4 -8.88E+3 4.52E+3 1-134 6.44E+2 1.73E+3 2.98E+4 2.75E+3 -1.O1E+O 6.15E+2 1-135 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 4.48E+5 1.11E+4 -5.25E+3 2.57E+3 Cs-134 3.73E+5 8.48E+5 -2.87E+5 9.76E+4 1.04E+4 7.28E+5 Cs-136 3.90E+4 1.46E+5 -8.56E+4 1.20E+4 1.17E+4 1.10E+5 Cs-137 4.78E+5 6.21E+5 -2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 4.28E+5 Ba-140 3.90E+4 4.90E+1 -1.67E+1 1.27E+6 2.18E+5 2.57E+3 Ce- 141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 -6.26E+3 3.62E+5 1.20E+5 1.53E+3 Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 -8.48E+5 7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5 Pr- 143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3 -2.16E+3 2.81E+5 2.OOE+5 4.64E+2 Nd-147 5.27E+3 6.1OE+3 -3.56E+3 2.21E+5 1.73E+5 3.65E+2 I I Page 110 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrerniyr per ptCi/m3)H-3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 C-14 2.60E+4 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 P-32 1.89E+6 1.1OE+5 -9.28E+4 7.16E+4 Cr-51 -7.50E+1 3.07E+1 2.1OE+4 3.OOE+3 1.35E+2 Mn-54 -5.11E+4 -1.27E+4 1.98E+6 6.68E+4 8.40E+3 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 --1.24E+5 6.39E+3 5.54E+3 Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 --1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 -6.92E+2 --5.86E+5 3.14E+4 9.20E+2 Co-58 -2.07E+3 --1.34E+6 9.52E+4 2.78E+3 Co-60 -1.51E+4 --8.72E+6 2.59E+5 1.98E+4 Ni-63 5.80E+5 4.34E+4 --3.07E+5 1.42E+4 1.98E+4 Zn-65 3.86E+4 1.34E+5 -8.64E+4 1.24E+6 4.66E+4 6.24E+4 Rb-86 -1.90E+5 --1.77E+4 8.40E+4 Sr-89 4.34E+5 ---2.42E+6 3.71E+5 1.25E+4 Sr-90 1.08E+8 ---1.65E+7 7.65E+5 6.68E+6 Y-91 6.61E+5 ---2.94E+6 4.09E+5 1.77E+4 Zr-95 1.46E+5 4.58E+4 -6.74E+4 2.69E+6 1.49E+5 3.15E+4 Nb-95 1.86E+4 1.03E+4 -1.OOE+4 7.51E+5 9.68E+4 5.66E+3 Ru- 103 2.1OE+3 --7.43E+3 7.83E+5 1.09E+5 8.96E+2 Ru- 106 9.84E+4 --1.90E+5 1.61E+7 9.60E+5 1.24E+4 Ag-110m 1.38E+4 1.31E+4 -2.50E+4 6.75E+6 2.73E+5 7.99E+3 Sb-124 4.30E+4 7.94E+2 9.76E+1 -3.85E+6 3.98E+5 1.68E+4 Sb-125 7.38E+4 8.08E+2 7.04E+1 -2.74E+6 9.92E+4 1.72E+4 Te-125m 4.88E+3 2.24E+3 1.40E+3 -5.36E+5 7.50E+4 6.67E+2 Te-127m 1.80E+4 8.16E+3 4.38E+3 6.54E+4 1.66E+6 1.59E+5 2.18E+3 Te-129m 1.39E+4 6.58E+3 4.58E+3 5.19E+4 1.98E+6 4.05E+5 2.25E+3 1-131 3.54E+4 4.91E+4 1.46E+7 8.40E+4 -6.49E+3 2.64E+4 1-132 1.59E+3 4.38E+3 1.51E+5 6.92E+3 -1.27E+3 1.58E+3 1-133 1.22E+4 2.05E+4 2.92E+6 3.59E+4 -1.03E+4 6.22E+3 1-134 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 -2.04E+1 8.40E+2 1-135 3.70E+3 9.44E+3 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 -6.95E+3 3.49E+3 Cs-134 5.02E+5 1.13E+6 -3.75E+5 1.46E+5 9.76E+3 5.49E+5 Cs-136 5.15E+4 1.94E+5 -1.1OE+5 1.78E+4 1.09E+4 1.37E+5 Cs-137 6.70E+5 8.48E+5 -3.04E+5 1.21E+5 8.48E+3 3.11E+5 Ba-140 5.47E+4 6.70E+1 -2.28E+1 2.03E+6 2.29E+5 3.52E+3 Ce-141 2.84E+4 1.90E+4 -8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 Ce-144 4.89E+6 2.02E+6 -1.21E+6 1.34E+7 8.64E+5 2.62E+5 Pr-143 1.34E+4 5.31E+3 -3.09E+3 4.83E+5 2.14E+5 6.62E+2 Nd-147 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 -5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 5.13E+2 Page 111 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrern/yr per ýtCi/m3)I I H-3 -1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 C-14 3.59E+4 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 P-32 2.60E+6 1.14E+5 --4.22E+4 9.88E+4 Cr-51 -8.55E+l 2.43E+1 1.70E+4 1.08E+3 1.54E+2 Mn-54 4.29E+4 1.OOE+4 1.58E+6 2.29E+4 9.51E+3 Fe-55 4.74E+4 2.52E+4 -1.11E+5 2.87E+3 7.77E+3 Fe-59 2.07E+4 3.34E+4 --1.27E+6 7.07E+4 1.67E+4 Co-57 9.03E+2 --5.07E+5 1.32E+4 1.07E+3 Co-58 1.77E+3 --1.11E+6 3.44E+4 3.16E+3 Co-60 -1.31E+4 --7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4 Ni-63 8.21E+5 4.63E+4 --2.75E+5 6.33E+3 2.80E+4 Zni-65 4.26E+4 1.13E+5 -7.14E+4 9.95E+5 1.63E+4 7.03E+4 Rb-86 1.98E+5 -7.99E+3 1.14E+5 Sr-89 5.99E+5 --2.16E+6 1.67E+5 1.72E+4 Sr-90 1.01E+8 ---1.48E+7 3.43E+5 6.44E+6 Y-91 9.14E+5 ---2.63E+6 1.84E+5 2.44E+4 Zr-95 1.90E+5 4.18E+4 -5.96E+4 2.23E+6 6.11E+4 3.70E+4 Nb-95 2.35E+4 9.18E+3 -8.62E+3 6.14E+5 3.70E+4 6.55E+3 Ru- 103 2.79E+3 --7.03E+3 6.62E+5 4.48E+4 1.07E+3 Ru-106 1.36E+5 --1.84E+5 1.43E+7 4.29E+5 1.69E+4 Ag-110m 1.69E+4 1.14E+4 -2.12E+4 5.48E+6 l.OOE+5 9.14E+3 Sb-124 5.74E+4 7.40E+2 1.26E+2 -3.24E+6 1.64E+5 2.OOE+4 Sb-125 9.84E+4 7.59E+2 9.1OE+1 -2.32E+6 4.03E+4 2.07E+4 Te-125m 6.73E+3 2.33E+3 1.92E+3 -4.77E+5 3.38E+4 9.14E+2 Te-127m 2.49E+4 8.55E+3 6.07E+3 6.36E+4 1.48E+6 7.14E+4 3.02E+3 Te-129m 1.92E+4 6.85E+3 6.33E+3 5.03E+4 1.76E+6 1.82E+5 3.04E+3 1-131 4.81E+4 4.81E+4 1.62E+7 7.88E+4 -2.84E+3 2.73E+4 1-132 2.12E+3 4.07E+3 1.94E+5 6.25E+3 -3.22E+3 1.88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+4 3.85E+6 3.38E+4 5.48E+3 7.70E+3 1-134 1.17E+3 2.16E+3 5.07E+4 3.30E+3 9.55E+2 9.95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 4.44E+3 4.14E+3 Cs- 134 6.51E+5 1.01E+6 -3.30E+5 1.21E+5 3.85E+3 2.25E+5 Cs-136 6.51E+4 1.71E+5 -9.55E+4 1.45E+4 4.18E+3 1.16E+5 Cs-137 9.07E+5 8.25E+5 -2.82E+5 1.04E+5 3.62E+3 1.28E+5 Ba-140 7.40E+4 6.48E+1 -2.11E+I 1.74E+6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 Ce-141 3.92E+4 1.95E+4 -8.55E+3 5.44E+5 5.66E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-144 6.77E+6 2.12E+6 -1.17E+6 1.20E+7 3.89E+5 3.61E+5 Pr-143 1.85E+4 5.55E+3 -3.OOE+3 4.33E+5 9.73E+4 9.14E+2 Nd-147 1.08E+4 8.73E+3 4.81E+3 3.28E+5 8.21E+4 6.81E+2 Page 112 of 158 U i Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), ihhalation Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (rnrem/yr per RCi/m3)EI, , ___ _ __Il H-3 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 C-14 2.65E+4 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 P-32 2.03E+6 1.12E+5 ---1.61E+4 7.74E+4 Cr-51 -5.75E+1 1.32E+1 1.28E+4 3.57E+2 8.95E+1 Mn-54 -2.53E+4 -4.98E+3 1.OOE+6 7.06E+3 4.98E+3 Fe-55 1.97E+4 1.17E+4 -8.69E+4 1.09E+3 3.33E+3 Fe-59 1.36E+4 2.35E+4 --1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-57 -6.51E+2 --3.79E+5 4.86E+3 6.41E+2 Co-58 -1.22E+3 --7.77E+5 1.11E+4 1.82E+3 Co-60 -8.02E+3 --4.51E+6 3.19E+4 1.18E+4 Ni-63 3.39E+5 2.04E+4 --2.09E+5 2.42E+3 1.16E+4 Zn-65 1.93E+4 6.26E+4 -3.25E+4 6.47E+5 5.14E+4 3.11E+4 Rb-86 -1.90E+5 --3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Sr-89 3.98E+5 ---2.03E+6 6.40E+4 1.14E+4 Sr-90 4.09E+7 ---1.12E+7 1.31E+5 2.59E+6 Y-91 5.88E+5 ---2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+4 Zr-95 1.15E+5 2.79E+4 -3.11E+4 1.75E+6 2.17E+4 2.03E+4 Nb-95 1.57E+4 6.43E+3 -4.72E+3 4.79E+5 1.27E+4 3.78E+3 Ru-103 2.02E+3 --4.24E+3 5.52E+5 1.61E+4 6.79E+2 Ru-106 8.68E+4 --1.07E+5 1.16E+7 1.64E+5 1.09E+4 Ag-i I10m 9.98E+3 7.22E+3 -1.09E+4 3.67E+6 3.30E+4 5.OOE+3 Sb-124 3.79E+4 5.56E+2 1.O1E+2 -2.65E+6 5.91E+4 1.20E+4 Sb-125 5.17E+4 4.77E+2 6.23E+1 -1.64E+6 1.47E+4 1.09E+4 Te-125m 4.76E+3 1.99E+3 1.62E+3 -4.47E+5 1.29E+4 6.58E+2 Te-127m 1.67E+4 6.90E+3 4.87E+3 3.75E+4 1.31E+6 2.73E+4 2.07E+3 Te-129m 1.41E+4 6.09E+3 5.47E+3 3.18E+4 1.68E+6 6.90E+4 2.23E+3 1-131 3.79E+4 4.44E+4 1.48E+7 5.18E+4 -1.06E+3 1.96E+4 1-132 1.69E+3 3.54E+3 1.69E+5 3.95E+5 -1.90E+3 1.26E+3 1-133 1.32E+4 1.92E+4 3.56E+6 2.24E+4 -2.61E+3 5.60E+3 1-134 9.21E+2 1.88E+3 4.45E+4 2.09E+3 -1.29E+3 6.65E+2 1-135 3.86E+3 7.60E+3 6.96E+5 8.47E+3 -1.83E+3 2.77E+3 Cs- 134 3.96E+5 7.03E+5 -1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.33E+3 7.45E+4 Cs-136 4.83E+4 1.35E+5 -5.64E+4 1.18E+4 1.43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E+5 6.12E+5 -1.72E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3 4.55E+4 Ba- 140 5.60E+4 5.60E+1 -1.34E+1 1.60E+6 3.84E+4 2.90E+3 Ce- 141 2.77E+4 1.67E+4 -5.25E+3 5.17E+5 2.16E+4 1.99E+3 Ce-144 3.19E+6 1.21E+6 -5.38E+5 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 1.76E+5 Pr-143 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 -1.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 6.99E+2 Nd-147 7.94E+3 8.13E+3 -3.15E+3 3.22E+5 3.12E+4 5.OOE+2 Page 113 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (nrem/yr per ýtCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrem/yr per pCi/sec) for others I I X"--!--A--

9IFI-Iro H-3 -7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 C-14 3.63E+5 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 P-32 1.71E+10 1.06E+9 1.92E+9 6.60E+8 Cr-51 --1.71E+4 6.30E+3 3.80E+4 7.20E+6 2.86E+4 Mn-54 -8.40E+6 -2.50E+6 2.57E+7 1.60E+6 Fe-55 2.51E+7 1.73E+7 --9.67E+6 9.95E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.OOE+7 --1.95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 -1.28E+6 ---3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 4.72E+6 ---9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 -1.64E+7 ---3.08E+8 3.62E+7 Ni-63 6.73E+9 4.66E+8 ---9.73E+7 2.26E+8 Zn-65 1.37E+9 4.36E+9 -2.92E+9 -2.75E+9 1.97E+9 Rb-86 -2.59E+9 5- -.11E+8 1.21E+9 Sr-89 1.45E+9 -2.33E+8 4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 1.35E+9 1.15E+10 Y-91 8.60E+3 -4.73E+6 2.30E+2 Zr-95 9.46E+2 3.03E+2 -4.76E+2 -9.62E+5 2.05E+2 Nb-95 8.25E+4 4.59E+4 -4.54E+4 -2.79E+8 2.47E+4 Ru-103 1.02E+3 -3.89E+3 -1.19E+5 4.39E+2 Ru- 106 2.04E+4 -3.94E+4 -1.32E+6 2.58E+3 Ag-110 ln 5.83E+7 5.39E+7 -1.06E+8 -2.20E+10 3.20E+7 Sb- 124 2.57E+7 4.86E+5 6.24E+4 2.OOE+7 7.31E+8 1.02E+7 Sb-125 2.04E+7 2.28E+5 2.08E+4 1.58E+7 2.25E+8 4.86E+6 Te-125m 1.63E+7 5.90E+6 4.90E+6 6.63E+7 -6.50E+7 2.18E+6 Te-127rn 4.58E+7 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 -1.54E+8 5.58E+6 Te-129rn 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 -3.04E+8 9.57E+6 1-131 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+ 11 7.27E+8 -1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+1 6.97E-1 -8.22E-2 1.53E-1 1-133 3.97E+6 6.90E+6 1.01E+9 1.20E+7 -6.20E+6 2.1OE+6 1-134 --1-135 1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 -4.1OE+4 1.34E+4 Cs-134 5.65E+9 1.34E+10 -4.35E+9 1.44E+9 2.35E+8 1.1OE+10 Cs-136 2.61E+8 1.03E+9 -5.74E+8 7.87E+7 1.17E+8 7.42E+8 Cs-137 7.38E+9 1.OIE+10 -3.43E+9 1.14E+9 1.95E+8 6.61E+9 Ba-140 2.69E+7 3.38E+4 -1.15E+4 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.76E+6 Ce-141 4.84E+3 3.27E+3 -1.52E+3 -1.25E+7 3.71E+2 Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 -8.87E+4 -1.21E+8 1.92E+4 Pr-143 1.59E+2 6.37E+1 -3.68E+1 -6.96E+5 7.88E+O Nd-147 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 -6.37E+1 -5.23E+5 6.52E+O I I I I I I 1 I I i I I I I I I Page 114 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (rnrern/yr per [tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

lnreln/yr per pCi/sec) for others H-3 -9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 6.70E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 P-32 3.15E+10 1.95E+9 --2.65E+9 1.22E+9 Cr-51 -2.78E+4 1.1OE+4 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 5.OOE+4 Mn-54 -1.40E+7 4.17E+6 -2.87E+7 2.78E+6 Fe-55 4.45E+7 3.16E+7 -2.OOE+7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59 5.20E+7 1.21E+8 -3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.68E+7 Co-57 -2.25E+6 --4.19E+7 3.76E+6 Co-58 7.95E+6 --1.1OE+8 1.83E+7 Co-60 -2.78E+7 --3.62E+8 6.26E+7 Ni-63 1.18E+10 8.35E+8 -1.33E+8 4.01E+8 Zn-65 2.11E+9 7.31E+9 4.68E+9 -3.10OE+9 3.41E+9 Rb-86 -4.73E+9 -7.OOE+8 2.22E+9 Sr-89 2.67E+9 -3.18E+8 7.66E+7 Sr-90 9.92E+7 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.1OE+6 Y-91 1.58E+4 -6.48E+6 4.24E+2 Zr-95 1.65E+3 5.22E+2 7.67E+2 -1.20E+6 3.59E+2 Nb-95 1.41E+5 7.80E+4 -7.57E+4 -3.34E+8 4.30E+4 Ru-103 1.81E+3 -6.40E+3 -1.52E+5 7.75E+2 Ru-106 3.75E+4 -7.23E+4 -1.80E+6 4.73E+3 Ag-l!Orn 9.63E+7 9.11E+7 -1.74E+8 -2.56E+10 5.54E+7 Sb- 124 4.59E+7 8.46E+5 1.04E+5 4.01E+7 9.25E+8 1.79E+7 Sb-125 3.65E+7 3.99E+5 3.49E+4 3.21E+7 2.84E+8 8.54E+6 Te-125m 3.OOE+7 1.08E+7 8.39E+6 -8.86E+7 4.02E+6 Te-127m 8.44E+7 2.99E+7 2.01E+7 3.42E+8 -2.1OE+8 L.OOE+7 Te-129m 1.1 1E+8 4.1OE+7 3.57E+7 4.62E+8 -4.15E+8 1.75E+7 1-131 5.38E+8 7.53E+8 2.20E+ I1 1.30E+9 -1.49E+8 4.04E+8 1-132 2.90E-1 7.59E-1 2.56E+1 1.20E+O -3.31E-1 2.72E-1 1-133 7.24E+6 1.23E+7 1.72E+9 2.15E+7 -9.30E+6 3.75E+6 1-134 .....1-135 2.47E+4 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 L.OOE+5 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 Cs-134 9.81E+9 2.31E+10 -7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 -9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 Cs-137 1.34E+10 1.78E+10 -6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6.20E+9 Ba-140 4.85E+7 5.95E+4 -2.02E+4 4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+6 Ce-141 8.87E+3 1.35E+4 -2.79E+3 -1.69E+7 6.81E+2 Ce- 144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 -1.63E+5 -1.66E+8 3.54E+4 Pr-143 2.92E+2 1.17E+2 -6.77E+1 -9.61E+5 1.45E+1 Nd-147 1.81E+2 1.97E+2 -1.16E+2 -7.11E+5 1.18E+l Page 115 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrern/yr per [tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrneln/yr per pCi/sec) for others I I-I -I -I -I -I -I -I -H-3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 1.65E+6 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 P-32 7.77E+10 3.64E+9 -2.15E+9 3.OOE+9 Cr-51 5.66E+4 1.55E+4 1.03E+5 5.41E+6 1.02E+5 Mn-54 2.09E+7 5.87E+6 -1.76E+7 5.58E+6 Fe-55 1.12E+8 5.93E+7 3.35E+7 1.1OE+7 1.84E+7 Fe-59 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 --5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71E+7 Co-57 -3.84E+6 ---3.14E+7 7.77E+6 Co-58 1.21E+7 ---7.08E+7 3.72E+7 Co-60 4.32E+7 ---2.39E+8 1.27E+8 Ni-63 2.96E+ 10 1.59E+9 ---1.07E+8 1.O1E+9 Zn-65 4.13E+9 1.lOE+10 -6.94E+9 -1.93E+9 6.85E+9 Rb-86 8.77E+9 ---5.64E+8 5.39E+9 Sr-89 6.62E+9 ---2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 1.12E+Il I ---1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Y-91 3.91E+4 ---5.21E+6 1.04E+3 Zr-95 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 -1.21E+3 -8.81E+5 7.52E+2 Nb-95 3.18E+5 1.24E+5 -1.16E+5 -2.29E+8 8.84E+4 Ru-103 4.29E+3 -1.08E+4 -1.11E+5 1.65E+3 Ru-106 9.24E+4 --1.25E+5 -1.44E+6 1.15E+4 Ag-1 IOin 2.09E+8 1.41E+8 -2.63E+8 -1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 1.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.40E+5 -6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb-125 8.70E+7 1.41E+6 8.06E+4 -4.85E+7 2.08E+8 1.82E+7 Te-125mn 7.38E+7 2.OOE+7 2.07E+7 --7.12E+7 9.84E+6 Te-127m 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 -1.68E+8 2.47E+7 Te- 129m 2.72E+8 7.61E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 -3.32E+8 4.23E+7 1-131 1.30E+9 1.31E+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 -1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+O 5.85E+1 1.93E+O -1.48E+O 5.80E- I 1-133 1.76E+7 2.18E+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+7 -8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 .- 135 5.84E+4 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 1.61E+5 -8.OOE+4 4.97E+4 Cs-134 2.26E+10 3.71E+10 -1.15E+10 4.13E+9 2.OOE+8 7.83E+9 Cs-136 1.OOE+9 2.76E+9 -1.47E+9 2.19E+8 9.70E+7 1.79E+9 Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 -1.O1E+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 Ba- 140 1.17E+8 1.03E+5 -3.34E+4 6.12E+4 5.94E+7 6.84E+6 Ce- 141 2.19E+4 1.09E+4 -4.78E+3 -1.36E+7 1.62E+3 Ce-144 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 -2.82E+5 -1.33E+8 8.66E+4 Pr-143 7.23E+2 2.17E+2 -1.17E+2 -7.80E+5 3.59E+1 Nd-147 4.45E+2 3.60E+2 -1.98E+2 -5.71E+5 2.79E+1 U I Page 116 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrert/yr per pCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m'2

mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) for others Ir"! -j- -ir ---- : d" IF Y 1 9 ri, H-3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 C-14 3.23E+6 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 P-32 1.60E+1 I 9.42E+9 --2.17E+9 6.21E+9 Cr-5l -1.05E+5 2.30E+4 2.05E+5 4.71E+6 1.61E+5 Mn-54 3.89E+7 -8.63E+6 -1.43E+7 8.83E+6 Fe-55 1.35E+8 8.72E+7 -4.27E+7 1.11E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 2.25E+8 3.93E+8 -1.16E+8 1.88E+8 1.55E+8 Co-57 8.95E+6 --3.05E+7 1.46E+7 Co-58 2.43E+7 --6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 -8.81E+7 --2.1OE+8 2.08E+8 Ni-63 3.49E+/-+10 2.16E+9 --1.07E+8 1.21E+9 Zn-65 5.55E+9 1.90E+10 -9.23E+9 -1.61E+10 8.78E+9 Rb-86 2.22E+10 --5.69E+8 1.1OE+10O Sr-89 1.26E+10 --2.59E+8 3.61E+8 Sr-90 1.22E+11 ---1.52E+9 3.10E+I10 Y-91 7.33E+4 ---5.26E+6 1.95E+3 Zr-95 6.83E+3 1.66E+3 -1.79E+3 -8.28E+5 1.18E+3 Nb-95 5.93E+5 2.44E+5 -1.75E+5 -2.06E+8 1.41E+5 Ru- 103 8.69E+3 -1.81E+4 -1.06E+5 2.91E+3 Ru-106 1.90E+5 -2.25E+5 1.44E+6 2.38E+4 Ag- I1Oim 3.86E+8 2.82E+8 -4.03E+8 1.46E+10 1.86E+8 Sb- 124 2.09E+8 3.08E+6 5.56E+5 1.31E+8 6.46E+8 6.49E+7 Sb-125 1.49E+8 1.45E+6 1.87E+5 9.38E+7 1.99E+8 3.07E+7 Te-125m 1.51E+8 5.04E+7 5.07E+7 -7.18E+7 2.04E+7 Te-127m 4.21E+8 1.40E+8 1.22E+8 1.04E+9 -1.70E+8 5.1OE+7 Te-129m 5.59E+8 1.92E+8 2.15E+8 1.40E+9 -3.34E+8 8.62E+7 1-131 2.72E+9 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 -1.15E+8 1.41E+9 1-132 1.42E+O 2.89E+O 1.35E+2 3.22E+O -2.34E+O 1.03E+O 1-133 3.72E+7 5.41E+7 9.84E+9 6.36E+7 -9.16E+6 1.58E+7 1-134 --1.01E-9 ---1-135 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 8.74E+4 8.80E+4 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+10 -1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 -2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9 Cs-137 5.15E+10 6.02E+10 -1.62E+10 6.55E+9 1.88E+8 4.27E+9 Ba-140 2.41E+8 2.41E+5 -5.73E+4 1.48E+5 5.92E+7 1.24E+7 Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 -8.15E+3 -1.37E+7 3.11E+3 Ce- 144 2.33E+6 9.52E+5 -3.85E+5 1.33E+8 1.30E+5 Pr-143 1.49E+3 5.59E+2 2.08E+2 -7.89E+5 7.41E+1 Nd-147 8.82E+2 9.06E+2 3.49E+2 -5.74E+5 5.55E+1 Page 117 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (rnrem/yr per pCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrem/yr per ptCl/sec) for others I I-. ii .- -i il -il- I nl -i I~i, -i -1)II H-3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 C-14 8.97E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 P-32 1.40E+9 8.73E+7 --1.58E+8 5.42E+7 Cr-51 -2.79E+4 1.03E+4 6.19E+4 1.17E+7 4.66E+4 Mn-54 3.11E+8 -9.27E+7 -9.54E+8 5.94E+7 Fe-55 2.09E+8 1.45E+8 --8.06E+7 8.29E+7 3.37E+7 Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 --8.35E+7 9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Co-57 1.17E+7 ---2.97E+8 1.95E+7 Co-58 3.09E+7 ---6.26E+8 6.92E+7 Co-60 1.67E+8 ---3.14E+9 3.69E+8 Ni-63 1.04E+10 7.21E+8 ---1.50E+8 3.49E+8 Zn-65 3.17E+8 1.01E+9 -6.75E+8 -6.36E+8 4.56E+8 Rb-86 2.19E+8 ---4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Sr-89 9.96E+9 ---1.60E+9 2.86E+8 Sr-90 6.05E+11 ---1.75E+10 1.48E+10 Y-91 5.13E+6 ---2.82E+9 1.37E+5 Zr-95 1.19E+6 3.81E+5 -5.97E+5 -1.21E+9 2.58E+5 Nb-95 1.42E+5 7.91E+4 -7.81E+4 -4.80E+8 4.25E+4 Ru-103 4.80E+6 --1.83E+7 -5.61E+8 2.07E+6 Ru-106 1.93E+8 --3.72E+8 -1.25E+10 2.44E+7 Ag-I1 Oin 1.06E+7 9.76E+6 -1.92E+7 -3.98E+9 5.80E+6 Sb-124 1.04E+8 1.96E+6 2.52E+5 -8.08E+7 2.95E+9 4.11E+7 Sb- 125 1.36E+8 1.52E+6 1.39E+5 -1.05E+8 1.50E+9 3.25E+7 Te-125m 9.66E+7 3.50E+7 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 -3.86E+8 1.29E+7 Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 1.42E+9 -1.17E+9 4.26E+7 Te-129m 2.55E+8 9.50E+7 8.75E+7 1.06E+9 -1.28E+9 4.03E+7 1-131 8.09E+7 1.16E+8 3.79E+10 1.98E+8 -3.05E+7 6.63E--7 1-132 5.74E+1 1.54E+2 5.38E+3 2.45E+2 -2.89E+1 5.38E+l 1-133 2.12E+6 3.69E+6 5.42E+8 6.44E+6 -3.31E+6 1.12E+6 1-134 1.06E-4 2.88E-4 5.OOE-3 4.59E-4 -2.51E-7 1.03E-4 1-135 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 -1.21E+5 3.94E+4 Cs- 134 4.66E+9 1.11E++/-1 -3.59E+9 1.19E+9 1.94E+8 9.07E+9 Cs-136 4.20E+7 1.66E+8 -9.24E+7 1.27E+7 1.89E+7 1.19E+8 Cs-137 6.36E+9 8.70E+9 -2.95E+9 9.81E+8 1.68E+8 5.70E+9 Ba-140 1.29E+8 1.62E+5 -5.49E+4 9.25E+4 2.65E+8 8.43E+6 Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 -6.17E+4 -5.08E+8 1.51E+4 Ce-144 3.29E+7 1.38E+7 -8.16E+6 -1.11E+10 1.77E+6 Pr- 143 6.34E+4 2.54E+4 -1.47E+4 -2.78E+8 3.14E+3 Nd-147 3.34E+4 3.86E+4 -2.25E+4 -1.85E+8 2.31E+3 I I I I I I I I I I I U I I Page 118 of 158 U I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (rnrernlyr per [tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrem/yr per pCi/sec) for others Nuli '-'SoeLvr Tyo in J1Ln- G-L .o H-3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 P-32 1.61E+9 9.96E+7 ---1.35E+8 6.23E+7 Cr-51 -3.44E+4 1.36E+4 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 6.20E+4 Mn-54 -4.52E+8 -1.35E+8 9.27E+8 8.97E+7 Fe-55 3.25E+8 2.31E+8 -1.46E+8 9.98E+7 5.38E+7 Fe-59 1.81E+8 4.22E+8 -1.33E+8 9.98E+8 1.63E+8 Co-57 -1.79E+7 --3.34E+8 3.OOE+7 Co-58 4.38E+7 -6.04E+8 1.O1E+8 Co-60 -2.49E+8 -3.24E+9 5.60E+8 Ni-63 1.61E+10 1.13E+9 --1.81E+8 5.45E+8 Zn-65 4.24E+8 1.47E+9 -9.41E+8 -6.23E+8 6.86E+8 Rb-86 -2.73E+8 --4.05E+7 1.28E+8 Sr-89 1.51E+10 -1.80E+9 4.33E+8 Sr-90 7.51E+11 -2.11E+10 1.85E+11 Y-91 7.87E+6 -3.23E+9 2.11E+5 Zr-95 1.74E+6 5.49E+5 -8.07E+5 -1.27E+9 3.78E+5 Nb-95 1.92E+5 1.06E+5 -1.03E+5 -4.55E+8 5.86E+4 Ru-103 6.87E+6 -2.42E+7 -5.74E+8 2.94E+6 Ru- 106 3.09E+8 -5.97E+8 -1.48E+10 3.90E+7 Ag-11Orn 1.52E+7 1.44E+7 -2.74E+7 -4.04E+9 8.74E+6 Sb- 124 1.55E+8 2.85E+6 3.51E+5 1.35E+8 3.11E+9 6.03E+7 Sb-125 2.14E+8 2.34E+6 2.04E+5 1.88E+8 1.66E+9 5.OOE+7 Te-125m 1.48E+8 5.34E+7 4.14E+7 -4.37E+8 1.98E+7 Te-127m 5.51E+8 1.96E+8 1.31E+8 2.24E+9 -1.37E+9 6.56E+7 Te- 129m 3.67E+8 1.36E+8 1.18E+8 1.54E+9 -1.38E+9 5.81E+7 1-131 7.70E+7 1.08E+8 3.14E+ 10 1.85E+8 -2.13E+7 5.79E+7 1-132 5.18E+1 1.36E+2 4.57E+3 2.14E+2 -5.91E+1 4.87E+1 1-133 1.97E+6 3.34E+6 4.66E+8 5.86E+6 -2.53E+6 1.02E+6 1-134 9.59E-5 2.54E-4 4.24E-3 4.01E-4 -3.35E-6 9.13E-5 1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.1OE+6 1.50E+5 -1.05E+5 3.52E+4 Cs-134 7.09E+9 1.67E+10 -5.30E+9 2.02E+9 2.08E+8 7.74E+9 Cs-136 4.29E+7 1.69E+8 -9.19E+7 1.45E+7 1.36E+7 1.13E+8 Cs-137 1.01E+10 1.35E+10 -4.59E+9 1.78E+9 1.92E+8 4.69E+9 Ba-140 1.38E+8 1.69E+5 -5.75E+4 1.14E+5 2.13E+8 8.91E+6 Ce-141 2.82E+5 1.88E+5 -8.86E+4 -5.38E+8 2.16E+4 Ce-144 5.27E+7 2.18E+7 -1.30E+7 -1.33E+10 2.83E+6 Pr-143 7.12E+4 2.84E+4 -1.65E+4 -2.34E+8 3.55E+3 Nd-147 3.63E+4 3.94E+4 -2.32E+4 -1.42E+8 2.36E+3 Page 119 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrern/yr per [tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m'

mrem/yr per ptCi/sec) for others H-3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 C-14 3.50E+6 7.O1E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.O1E+5 7.O1E+5 P-32 3.37E+9 1.58E+8 ---9.30E+7 1.30E+8 Cr-51 -6.54E+4 1.79E+4 1.19E+5 6.25E+6 1.18E+5 Mn-54 6.61E+8 -1.85E+8 5.55E+8 1.76E+8 Fe-55 8.OOE+8 4.24E+8 --2.40E+8 7.86E+7 1.3 1E+8 Fe-59 4.01E+8 6.49E+8 --1.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 -2.99E+7 --2.45E+8 6.04E+7 Co-58 6.47E+7 -3.77E+8 1.98E+8 Co-60 3.78E+8 --2.1OE+9 1.12E+9 Ni-63 3.95E+10 2.11E+9 --1.42E+8 1.34E+9 Zn-65 8.12E+8 2.16E+9 -1.36E+9 -3.80E+8 1.35E+9 Rb-86 4.52E+8 --2.91E+7 2.78E+8 Sr-89 3.59E+10 ----1.39E+9 1.03E+9 Sr-90 1.24E+12 ----1.67E+10 3.15E+11 Y-91 1.87E+7 ----2.49E+9 5.01E+5 Zr-95 3.90E+6 8.58E+5 -1.23E+6 -8.95E+8 7.64E+5 Nb-95 4.1OE+5 1.59E+5 -1.50E+5 -2.95E+8 1.14E+5 Ru-103 1.55E+7 --3.89E+7 -3.99E+8 5.94E+6 Ru- 106 7.45E+8 --1.OIE+9 -1.16E+ 10 9.30E+7 Ag-11Om 3.22E+7 2.17E+7 -4.05E+7 -2.58E+9 1.74E+7 Sb-124 3.52E+8 4.57E+6 7.78E+5 -1.96E+8 2.20E+9 1.23E+8 Sb-125 4.99E+8 3.85E+6 4.62E+5 -2.78E+8 1.19E+9 1.05E+8 Te-125m 3.51E+8 9.50E+7 9.84E+7 --3.38E+8 4.67E+7 Te- 127m 1.32E+9 3.56E+8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 -1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-129m 8.54E+8 2.39E+8 2.75E+8 2.51E+9 -1.04E+9 1.33E+8 1-131 1.43E+8 1.44E+8 4.76E+10 2.36E+8 -1.28E+7 8.18E+7 1-132 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2 -1.99E+2 7.77E+1 1-133 3.59E+6 4.44E+6 8.25E+8 7.40E+6 -1.79E+6 1.68E+6 1-134 1.70E-4 3.16E-4 7.28E-3 4.84E-4 -2.1OE-4 1.46E-4 1-135 6.54E+4 1.18E+5 1.04E+7 1.81E+5 -8.98E+4 5.57E+4 Cs-134 1.60E+10 2.63E+10 -8.14E+9 2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 Cs-136 8.06E+7 2.22E+8 -1.18E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8 Cs-137 2.39E+10 2.29E+10 -7.46E+9 2.68E+9 1.43E+8 3.38E+9 Ba- 140 2.77E+8 2.43E+5 -7.90E+4 1.45E+5 1.40E+8 1.62E+7 Ce-141 6.35E+5 3.26E+5 -1.43E+5 -4.07E+8 4.84E+4 Ce-144 1.27E+8 3.98E+7 -2.21E+7 1.04E+10 6.78E+6 Pr-143 1.48E+5 4.46E+4 -2.41E+4 1.60E+8 7.37E+3 Nd-147 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 3.18E+4 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 I I I I I I 1 I!I I I I I I I I Page 120 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m2

mremn/yr per pCi/sec)Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-14 P-32 Cr-51 4.68E+6 Mn-54 1.34E+9 Fe-55 Fe-59 2.75E+8 Co-58 3.82E+8 Co-60 2.16E+10 Ni-63 Zn-65 7.45E+8 Rb-86 8.98E+6 Sr-89 2.16E+4 Sr-90 Y-91 1.08E+6 Zr-95 2.48E+8 Nb-95 1.36E+8 Ru- 103 1.09E+8 Ru- 106 4.21E+8 Ag-IOrn 3.47E+9 Te-125m 1.55E+6 Te-127m 9.17E+4 Te-129m 2.OOE+7 1-131 1.72E+7 1-132 1.24E+6 1-133 2.47E+6 1-134 4.49E+5 1-135 2.56E+6 Cs-134 6.75E+9 Cs-136 1.49E+8 Cs-137 1.04E+10 Ba-140 2.05E+7 Ce-141 1.36E+7 Ce-144 6.95E+7 Pr- 143 Nd-147 8.40E+6 Page 121 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX A Evaluation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents Page 122 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents A. Effective Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPCe)In accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8 the radioactive liquid effluent monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed the MPC value of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F). The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual radionuclide distribution and corresponding MPC values.In order to limit the need for routinely having to reestablish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established.

This default setpoint can be based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution of the liquid effluents from Salem and the effective MPC value for this distribution.

The effective MPC value for a radionuclide distribution is calculated by the equation: YCi (gamma)MPCe = i Z Ci (gamma)MPGi where: MPCe = an effective MPC value for a mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides

([tCi/ml)Ci = concentration of radionuclide i in the mixture MPCG = the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 MPC value for radionuclide i (Appendix F) (pCi/ml)The equation for determining the liquid effluent setpoints (Section 1.2.1, equation 1.2) is based on a multiplication of the effective MPC times the monitor sensitivity.

Considering the average effective MPC value for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998, it is reasonable to select an MPCe value of 6.05E-06 jiCi/ml for Unit 1 and 4.81 E-06 ptCi/ml for Unit 2 as typical of liquid radwaste discharges.

Page 123 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 B. Correction Factor The type of radiation detector used to monitor radioactive releases is not capable of detecting non-gamma emitting radionuclides such as H-3, Fe-55, and Sr-89, 90, as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1.

A conservative default safety factor can be determined to account for non-gamma emitting radionuclides.

Non-gamma emitting radionuclides are analyzed at Salem station on a monthly basis from a composite sample of liquid releases.Nuclide MPC (jCi/ml) Activity (,Ci/nil)

Activity / MPC H-3 3E-3 5.2E-1 173.3 Fe-55 8E-4 2.5E-3 3.1 Sr-89 3E-6 2.OE-5 6.7 Sr-90 3E-7 7.2E-7 2.4 Total 185.5 The values in the table above represent the maximum reactor coolant values for non-gamma emitting nuclides in 1994 for Unit 1 and 2. Reactor coolant values were chosen to represent the maximum concentration of non-gamma emitting nuclides that could be released from Salem Station. The activity values in the table will be diluted by a minimum factor of 800 prior to release. The minimum dilution factor is obtained by using the minimum circulating water flowrate of 100,000 gpm and the maximum release rate of 120 gpm.A conservative non-gamma factor for non-gamna emitting nuclides can be obtained using the highest Activity/MPC fraction and the minimum dilution factor as follows: I I I I I I I I I I!I I Non-Gamma Factor =Correction Factor =185.5 / 800 1 -0.25= 0.23 (Rounded up to 0.25)= 0.75 C. Default setpoint determination:

Using the information and parameters described above a default setpoint can be calculated for Unit 1 and 2 liquid radwaste disposal process radiation monitors (Rl18).Using these values to calculate the default R 18 alarm setpoint value, results in a setpoint that: 1) Will not require frequent re-adjustment due to minor variations in the nuclide distribution which are typical of routine plant operations, and 2) Will provide for a liquid radwaste discharge rate (as evaluated for each batch release) that is compatible with plant operations (refer to Tables I -1.1 and 1-1.2).Page 124 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table A- 1: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 1 Activity Released (Ci)Nuclide MPC* 1993 1994 1998 (LtCi/ml)

CURIES CURIES CURIES BE-7 2.OOE-03 8.88E-04 ND ND NA-24 3.OOE-05 6.68E-04 1.62E-04 1.OOE-04 CR-51 2.OOE-03 5.38E-03 2.02E-03 ND MN-54 1.OOE-04 3.52E-02 1.37E-02 7.16E-04 MN-56 1.OOE-04 ND ND 0.OOE+00 FE-59 5.OOE-05 4.76E-04 4.84E-03 ND CO-57 4.OOE-04 1.03E-02 3.1OE-03 1.78E-05 CO-58 9.OOE-05 1.71E+00 6.47E-01 3.39E-02 CO-60 3.OOE-05 3.04E-01 1.1OE-01 2.42E-02 ZR-95 6.OOE-05 3.29E-03 7.13E-04 ND NB-95 1.OOE-04 5.78E-03 1.28E-03 ND NB-97 9.OOE-04 1.27E-03 1.07E-03 4.90E-05 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 2.66E-04 ND ND SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.18E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND 7.32E-06 ND MO-99 4.OOE-05 1.76E-04 1.76E-04 ND AG- 110m 3.OOE-05 1.19E-02 1.1OE-02 6.58E-05 SN-113 8.OOE-05 7.88E-05 4.91E-05 ND SB-122 3.OOE-05 1.21E-03 5.35E-04 1.12E-03 SB-124 2.OOE-05 2.08E-02 1.75E-02 1.73E-02 SB-125 1.OOE-04 9.04E-02 8.23E-02 3.56E-02 SB-126 3.OOE-06 ND 6.18E-05 2.23E-04 1-131 3.OOE-07 1.27E-01 1.82E-02 2.32E-03 1-133 l.OOE-06 2.16E-03 1.88E-04 8.32E-06 1-134 2.OOE-05 ND 3.63E-04 ND CE-141 9.OOE-05 ND 4.24E-05 ND CE- 143 4.OOE-05 5.42E-05 ND ND CS-134 9.OOE-06 3.54E-01 6.46E-01 2.49E-02 CS-136 6.OOE-05 3.61E-03 1.59E-03 ND CS-137 2.OOE-05 4.53E-01 8.54E-01 7.51E-02 CS-138 3.OOE-06 4.15E-06 1.35E-04 ND BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND 8.62E-05 ND LA-140 2.OOE-05 2.12E-04 1.86E-04 ND RU-105 1.OOE-04 2.21E-04 1.35E-04 ND RU-106 1.OOE-05 ND 1.03E-03 ND ZN-65 1.OOE-04 6.72E-04 ND ND Total Ci Ganmma 3.14E+00 2.42E+00 2.16E-01 MPCe (paCi/ml) 6.05E-06 1.28E-05 1.28E-05 MPC value for unrestricted area from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2.** ND -not detected Page 125 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table A-2: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 2 Activity Released (Ci)Nuclide MPC* 1993 1994 1998 (pCi/ml) CURIES CURIES CURIES BE-7 2.OOE-03 1.59E-03 2.88E-04 ND NA-24 3.OOE-05 1.05E-03 5.77E-05 7.39E-05 CR-51 2.00E-03 4.39E-03 1.55E-03 1.14E-04 I MIN-54 1.OOE-04 3.73E-02 1.37E-02 7.54E-04 MN-56 1.OOE-04 ND ND 4.66E-05 FE-59 5.00E-05 4.83E-04 3.25E-03 ND I CO-57 4.OOE-04 1.17E-02 3.24E-03 ND CO-58 9.00E-05 1.75E+00 6.60E-01 4.52E-02 CO-60 3.OOE-05 3.47E-01 1.03E-01 2.12E-02 I ZR-95 6.00E-05 2.34E-03 3.22E-04 ND NB-95 1.OOE-04 3.97E-03 1.11E-03 ND NB-97 9.00E-04 1.46E-03 1.1OE-03 4.22E-05 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 3.77E-04 ND 2.35E-06 SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.71E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND 1.43E-05 ND MO-99 4.OOE-05 ND ND ND AG- 10m 3.OOE-05 1.03E-02 1.34E-02 ND SN- 13 8.00E-05 7.45E-05 ND ND SB-122 3.OOE-05 1.20E-03 ND 6.37E-04 SB-124 2.OOE-05 3.77E-02 9.82E-03 1.44E-02 SB-125 L.OOE-04 1.35E-01 6.03E-02 1.88E-02 SB-126 3.OOE-06 3.51E-04 ND 1.97E-04 1-131 3.OOE-07 1.87E-01 7.98E-03 3.14E-03 I-132 8.OOE-06 8.72E-05 ND 1.68E-04 1-134 2.OOE-05 2.39E-04 1.85E-04 ND CE-141 9.OOE-05 ND 2.87E-05 ND CE-143 4.OOE-05 ND ND ND CS-134 9.OOE-06 4.57E-01 6.44E-01 2.64E-02 I CS-136 6.OOE-05 4.82E-03 1.51E-03 ND CS-137 2.OOE-05 5.70E-01 8.54E-01 7.97E-02 CS-138 3.OOE-06 ND ND 4.90E-05 BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND ND ND LA- 140 2.00E-05 2.03E-03 1.11E-04 ND RU-105 I.OOE-04 4.07E-05 ND ND I RU-106 1.OOE-05 ND 4.38E-04 ND ZN-65 1.OOE-04 1.59E-04 ND ND W-187 6.OOE-05 ND 7.98E-05 ND Total Ci Ganuna 3.57E+00 2.38E+00 2.31E-01 MPCe (pCi/nil) 4.81E-06 1.55E-05 1.12E-05 MPC value for unrestricted area from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2.** ND = not detected I Page 126 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX B Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations Liquid Radioactive Effluent Page 127 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations

-Liquid Effluents I The radioactive liquid effluents for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998 were evaluated to determine the dose contribution of the radionuclide distribution.

These were the most recent years of full power operation for both Units. This analysis was performed to evaluate the use of a limited dose analysis for determining environmental doses, providing a simplified method of determining compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2.For the radionuclide distribution of effluents from Salem, the controlling organ is typically the GI-LLI.The calculated GI-LLI dose is predominately a function of the Fe-55, Co-58, Co-60, Fe-59 and Ag-i 1Oim releases.

The radionuclides, Cs-134 and Cs-137 contribute the large majority of the calculated total body dose. The results of the evaluation for 1993, 1994, and 1998 are presented in Table B-1 and Table B-2.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculational process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative.

For the evaluation of the maximum organ dose, it is conservative to use the Nb-95 dose conversion factor (1.51 E+06 mrem/hr per [tCi/ml, GI-LLI). By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be overestimated since this nuclide has the highest organ dose factor of all the radionuclides evaluated.

For the total body calculation, the Fe-59 dose factor (2.32 E+05 mrem/hr per pCi/ml, total body) is the highest among the identified dominant nuclides.

For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2, the following simplified equations may be used: I Total Body Dibl .67E -02* VOL

AFe-59,TB

Ci (B.1)cw Where: Dtb = dose to the total body (mrem)A Fe-59,TB = 7.27E+04, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Fe-59 (mrem/hr per ýtCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)Ci = total concentration of all radionuclides

(ýtCi/hrl)

CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period(gal/min) 1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)Page 128 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Substituting the value for the Fe-59 total body dose conversion factor, the equation simplifies to: 1.21E+03*VOL

-IC(Dt/_w*,C (B.2)C W i Maximum Organ Dmax:= 1.67E-02*VOL

ANb_95,GILLI

ICi (B.3)CW Where: Dmnax = maximum organ dose (mrem)ANb-95,GI-LLI

= 1.51 E+06, Gi-LLI ingestion dose conversion factor for Nb-95 (mrem/hr per 1 tCi/ml)Substituting the value for ANb-95,GI-LLI the equation simplifies to: Dmax 2.5 2 E+0 4*VOL *-C. (B.4)CW i Tritium is not included in the limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is relatively negligible.

The average annual tritium release from each Salem Unit is approximately 350 curies. The calculated total body dose from such a release is 2.4E-03 mrem/yr via the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways.

This amounts to 0.08% of the design limit dose of 3 mrem/yr. Furthermore, the release of tritium is a function of operating time and power level and is essentially unrelated to radwaste system operation.

Page 129 of 158 M M M M M M M M M M M M M n M M M M M Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table B-1: Adult Dose Contributions

-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 1 Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.32E-2 3.51E-2 7.16E-4 * *

0.03 0.02 *

0.02 *Fe-55 1.49E-1 6.40E-2 8.39E-2 0.07 0.04 0.37 0.12 0.03 0.52 0.19 0.14 0.67 Fe-59 4.84E-3 4.77E-4 N/D 0.02 *

0.12 0.01

0.03 0.01 *Co-58 6.47E-1 1.71E+0 3.39E-2 0.05 0.18 0.02 0.31 0.51 0.13 0.01 0.07 *Co-60 1.IOE-1 3.04E-1 2.42E-2 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.24 0.24

0.03 0.01 Zn-65 N/D 6.72E-4 N/D

0.01 *

0.01 *

0.02 *Nb-95 1.28E-3 5.78E-3 N/D * * *

0.01 * * * *Ag-110m 1.1OE-2 1.19E-2 6.58E-5 * *

0.26 0.17 0.01 * * *Sb-124 1.75E-2 2.58E-2 1.73E-2 * * * *

0.04 * * *Sb-125 8.23E-2 9.04E-2 3.56E-2 * * * *

0.02 * * *Cs-134 6.46E-1 3.54E-1 2.49E-2 0.47 0.38 0.18 * *

0.38 0.37 0.09 Cs-137 8.54E-1 4.53E-1 7.51E-2 0.37 0.28 0.32 * *

0.37 0.35 0.20 Total 2.53E+0 3.21E+0 3.31E-1* Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 130 of 158

-M- m M M M M M M M M M M M M M MM Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions

-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 2 Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.37E-2 3.73E-2 7.54E-4 * *

0.01 0.02 *

0.01 *Fe-55 1.38E-1 6.61E-2 1.64E-2 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.27 Fe-59 3.25E-3 4.82E-4 N/D 0.01 *

0.08 0.01

0.02 * *Co-58 6.60E-1 1.75E+0 4.52E-2 0.05 0.16 0.04 0.29 0.51 0.29 0.01 0.06 0.01 Co-60 1.03E-1 3.47E-1 2.12E-2 0.02 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.27 0.37 0.01 0.03 0.02 Zn-65 N/D 1.59E-4 N/D * * * * * * * * *Nb-95 1.11 E-3 3.97E-3 N/D * *

0.06 0.01 * * * *Ag-11Orn 1.34E-2 1.03E-2 N/D * *

0.31 0.14 * * * *Sb-124 9.82E-3 3.77E-2 1.44E-2 * * *

0.01 0.06 * * *Sb-125 6.03E-2 1.35E-1 1.88E-2 * * *

0.01 0.02 * * *Cs-134 6.44E-1 4.58E-1 2.64E-2 0.48 0.41 0.26 0.01 *

0.39 0.40 0.20 Cs-137 8.54E-1 5.70E-1 7.97E-2 0.37 0.30 0.46 * *

0.38 0.36 0.45 Total 2.48E+0 3.65E+0 2.23E-1* Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 131 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX C Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors Gaseous Radioactive Effluent I Page 132 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX C: Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors -Gaseous Effluents Overview The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors which are radionuclide specific.These effective factors, which can be based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity released to approximate the dose in the environment (i.e., instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analyses only a single multiplication (Keff, Meff or Neff)times the total quantity of radioactive material released would be needed).This approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a detailed calculational technique.

Determination of Effective Dose Factors Effective dose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations:

Keff:Z(Ki*fi) (C.1)i Where: Keff = the effective total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released Ki = the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released fi = the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide i relative to the total noble gas activity Where: (L + 1.1 M)eff = the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble gases released (Li + 1.1 M) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Page 133 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 U MeimZ(M A) (C.3)I Where: Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released I Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Nrj=-(Ni*f) (C.4)Where: 1 Neff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releases from Salem have been maintained to such negligible quantities that the inherent variability in the data makes any meaningful evaluations difficult.

I Therefore, in order to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the primary coolant source term from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source Tenn I Specifications," has been used as representing a typical distribution.

The effective dose factors as derived are presented in Table C-1.Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose I calculational process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not significantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment.

For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2, the following simplified equations may be used: Dr3.17E-08 Q QI 8 *Me ff* (C.5)0.50 and I*3.17E-08

Neffs* Qi (C.6)0.50 Where: I Page 134 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 D7 = air dose due to gamma emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)Dp -= air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)X/Q atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/m3)Meff = 5.3E+02, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ýtCi/m3)Neff = 1.1 E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per jiCi/m3)Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (ptCi)3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec)0.50 = conservatism factor to account for the variability in the effluent data Combining the constants, the dose calculational equations simplify to: Dy=3.5E-05*

/Q* iQi and D,6=7.OE-O5*

Q* ZQi Q (C.7)(C.8)The effective dose factors are used on a very limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may be unavailable.

Page 135 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table C-1: Effective Dose Factors Noble Gases -Total Body and Skin Total Body Effective Dose Factor Keff (mremn/yr per ptCi/rn 3)Skin Effective Dose Factor (L+ 1.1 M)eff (mremlryr per pCi/rn 3)Radionuclide Kr-85 Kr-88 Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 0.02 1.5E+02 2.5E+00 2.8E+02 3.6E+01 4.7E+02 1.4E+01 1.9E+02 1.4E+01 6.6E+02 7.9E+01 9.6E+02 Total Noble Gases -Air Gamma Air Effective Dose Factor Meff (mrad/yr per pCi/rn 3)Beta Air Effective Dose Factor Neff (mrad/yr per [tCi/m 3)I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Radionuclide Kr-85 Kr-88 Xe-1331n Xe-133 Xe-135 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 0.02 1.5E+02 3.3E+00 3.4E+02 3.8E+01 5.3E+02 2.OE+01 2.9E+01 1.5E+01 1.OE+03 4.9E+01 1.1E+03 Total* Based on Noble gas distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANSI-18.1, "Source Term Specifications." Page 136 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX D Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculation Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Page 137 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1 APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculation

-Gaseous Effluents The pathway dose factors for the controlling infant age group were evaluated to determine the controlling pathway, organ and radionuclide.

This analysis was performed to provide a simplified I method for determining compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 For the infant age group, the controlling pathway is the grass-cow-milk (g/c/m) pathway. An infant I receives a greater radiation dose from the g/c/m pathway than any other pathway. Of this g/c/m pathway, the maximum exposed organ including the total body, is the thyroid, and the highest dose contributor is radionuclide 1-131. The results for this evaluation are presented in Table D-1.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant organ and radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for the organ and radionuclide.

Multiplication of the total release (i.e.cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative.

For the evaluation of the dose commitment via a controlling pathway and age group, it is conservative to use the infant, g/c/m, thyroid, 1-131 pathway dose factor (1.05E 12 m mrem/yr per [tCi!sec).

By this approach, the maximum dose commitment will be overestimated since 1-131 has the highest pathway dose factor of all radionuclides evaluated.

For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, the following simplified equation may be used: Dnax = 3.17E -08

W

R -131* ZQi Where: Dmnax = maximum organ dose (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameters to the controlling location(s) as identified in I Table 2-3.X/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/mi 3) 2 D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (i-2)Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radioiodines and particulates 3.17E-8 = conversion factor (yr/sec) I RI-1 3 1 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway= 1.05E++/-12 (M 2 mrem/yr per jiCi/sec), infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need not be considered when the above simplified calculation method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these pathways to the total thyroid dose.I Page 138 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g., Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground exposure pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than either the vegetation or milk pathway.However, use of the 1-131 thyroid dose parameter for all radionuclides will maximize the organ dose calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclide has a higher dose parameter for any organ via any pathway than 1-131 for the thyroid via the milk pathway (see Table D-1).The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3. If more limiting pathways in the surrounding environment of Salem are identified by the annual land use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.Page 139 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table D-1: Infant Dose Contributions Fraction of Total Organ and Body Dose I I PATHWAYS Target Organs Total Body Grass-Cow-Milk 0.02 0.23 Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 0.59 0.02 0.01 0.02 Ground Plane 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.15 Fraction of Dose Contribution by Pathway Pathway f Grass-Cow-Milk 0.92 Ground Plane 0.08 Inhalation N/A Page 140 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX E Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sample Type, Location and Analysis Page 141 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX E: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples are identified by a three part code. The first two letters are the power station identification code, in this case "SA". The next three letters are for the media sampled.AIO = Air Iodine APT = Air Particulates ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab ESF = Edible Fish ESS = SedimentSWA

= Surface Water WWA = Well Water IDM Immersion Dose (PD)MLK = Milk PWR Potable Water (Raw)PWT = Potable Water (Treated)The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from the site center point.The midpoint of a line between the centers of Salem units 1 & 2 containment domes was used as the site center point. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, 5=E, 6=ESE, 7=SE, 8=SSE, 9=S, 10=SSW, 11=SW, 12=WSW, 13=W, 14=WNW, 15=NW and 16=NNW. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the plant: I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I S = On-site location A = 0-1 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site C 2-3 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site E = 4-5 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site H = > 20 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-5D1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 5, centered at 90'(due east) with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 3 to 4 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance D). The number I indicated that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Table E- 1.Maps E-1 and E-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site center point.Page 142 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE E-1: REMP Sample Locations A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (IDM)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*iSi 0.55 mi. N 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE 2S4 0.60 mi. NNE; in the equipment laydown area 3S1 0.58 mi. NE 4S1 0.60 mi ENE; site access road near intersection to TB-02 5S1 0.86 mi. E; site access road 6S2 0.23 mi. ESE; area around helicopter pad 7S1 0.12 mi. SE; station personnel gate 8 S1 0.12mi. SSE, Fuel Oil Storage 9 S1 0.1 2mi. S, Fuel Oil Storage 10Si 0.14 mi. SSW; circ water bldg.11S]. 0.09 mi. SW; service water bldg.12S1 0.09 mi. WSW; Outside Security Fence 13S1 0.09 mi. W; Outside Security Fence 14S1 0.10 mi. NNW; Outside Security Fence 15SI 0.57 mi. NW; near river and barge slip 15S2 0.59 mi. NW, near river 16S1 0.57 mi. NNW; on road near fuel oil storage tank 16S2 0.60 mi. NNW; near security firing range 16S3 1.0 mi NNW, Consolidated Spoils Facility 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE; Alloway Creek Neck Road 5D1 3.5 mi. E; local farm 103D1 3.9 mi. SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW; Bay View, DE 15D 1 3.8 mi. NW; Rt 9, Augustine Beach, DE 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE; local farm 3E1 4.2 mi. NE; local farm I1 E2 5.0 mi. SW; Rt. 9 12E 1 4.4 mi. WSW; Thomas Landing 13EI 4.2 mi. W; Diehl House Lab 16EI 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn 1Fi 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg 2F2 8.5 mi. NNE; Salem Substation 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE; Salem High School 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; PSE&G Training Center Salem NJ 3F2 5.1 mi. NE; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 3F3 8.6 mi. NE; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE; Mays Lane, Hannersville, NJ 5F1 6.5 mi. E; Canton, NJ Page 143 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 TABLE E-1 (Cont'd)A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (1DM) (Cont'd)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*6F11 6.4 mi. ESE; Stow Neck Road 7F2 9.1 mi. SE; Bayside, NJ 8F11 9.7 mi. Woodland Beach 9F11 5.3 mi. S; off Route #9, DE 1 0F2 5.8 mi. SSW; Rt. 9 1IFI 6.2 mi. SW; Taylors Bridge, DE 12F1 9.4 mi. WSW; Townsend Elementary School, DE 133F2 6.5 mi. W; Odessa, DE 133F3 9.3 mi. W; Redding Middle School 133F4 9.8 mi. W; Middletown, DE 144F2 6.7 mi. WNW; Rt 13 and Boyds Comer Rd 15F3 5.4 mi. NW 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW; Delaware City Public School 1G3 19 mi. N; N. Church St. Wilmington, DE 3G1 17 mi. NE; local farm IOG1 12 mi. SSW; Smyma, DE 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE 16G 1 15 mi. NNW; Wilmington Airport 3H1 32 mi. NE; National Park, NJ B. Air Sampling Locations (AIO, APT)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*5S1 0.86 mi. E; site access road 5S2 0.86 mi. E; site access road 15S2 0.59 mi. NW, Hope Creek Barge slip 7S1 0.12 mi. SE; old Salem parking lot 5D1 3.5 mi. E; local farm 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; PSE&G Training Center Salem, NJ 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE Page 144 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table E-1 (Cont'd)C. Surface Water Locations (SWA) -Delaware River STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*11Al 0.2 mi. SW; Salem Outfall Area I lAla Alternate 0.15 SE location in plant barge slip area 12C 1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River 12C 1 a Alternate 3.7 mi.WSW at the tip of Augustine Beach Boat Ramp 7El 4.5 mi. SE; River Bank 1.0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 7E1a Alternate 8.87 mi SE at the end of Bayside Road 1F2 7.1 mi. N; midpoint of Delaware R.16F 1 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal 16FIa Alternate 6.84 mi. NNW; Located at the C&D Canal Tip D. Ground Water Locations (WWA)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*3El 4.2 mi NE, local farm No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However, this location (3El) is being monitored as a management audit sample E. Drinking Water Locations (PWR, PWT)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*2F3 8.0 mi NNE, City of Salem Water and Sewage Department No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly affected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations.

However, this location (2F3) is being monitored as a management audit sample.F. Water Sediment Locations (ESS)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*11Al 0.2 mi. SW; Salem outfall area 15A1 0.65 mi. NW; Hope Creek outfall area 16A1 0.24 mi. NNW; South Storm Drain outfall 12C 1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal 6S2 0.23 mi. ESE; area around helicopter pad Page 145 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table E-1 (Cont'd)G. Milk Sampling Locations (MLK)I i I STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*2G3 11.8 mi. NNE, local farm 13E3 5.0 mi W, local farm 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW; local farm 3G1 17 mi. NE; local farm H. Fish and Invertebrate Locations (ESF, ECH)STATION LOCATION*I STATION CODE hllA 12C1 7El 0.2 mi. SW; Salem outfall area 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River 4.5 mi. SE; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek I. Food Product Locations BROADLEAF COLLECTIONS STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*1S1 0.55 mi. N 16S1 0.57 mi. NNW; on road near fuel oil storage tank 16S2 0.60 mi. NNW; near security firing range 10D1 3.9 mi. SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged.

However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations.

All distances and directions for the Station Locations are referenced to the midpoint between the two Salem units' containments.

The WGS 84 coordinates for this site center point location are: Latitude N 39' -27' -46.5" and Longitude W 750 -32' -10.6".I I I I I I I I U I I I I Page 146 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 SAMPLES COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Collection Method Analysis Sample Air Particulate Air Iodine Crab and Fish Continuous low volume air sampler. Sample collected every week along with the filter change.A TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge is connected to air particulate air sampler and is collected weekly at filter change.Two batch samples are sealed in a plastic bag or jar and fi-ozen semi-annually or when in season.A sediment sample is taken semi-annually.

2 PD's will be collected fr-om each location quarterly.

Gross Beta analysis on each weekly sample. Gammna spectrometry shall be performed if gross beta exceeds 10 times the yearly mean of the control station value. Samples shall be analyzed 24 hIrs or more after collection to allow for radon and thorium daughter decay. Gamma isotopic analysis on quarterly composites.

Iodine 131 analysis are performed on each weekly sample.Gamma isotopic analysis of edible portion on collection.

Sediment Gamma isotopic analysis semi-amnually.

Gamma dose quarterly.

Direct Page 147 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS (Cont'd)Sample Collection Method Analysis Milk Sample of fresh milk is collected for each farm semi-monthly when cows are in pasture, monthly at other times.Sample to be collected monthly providing winter icing conditions allow.Gamma isotopic analysis and 1-131 analysis on each sample on collection.

Gamma isotopic monthly H-3 on quarterly surface sample, monthly on ground water sample.Water (Potable, Surface)I i i I I I I!!I I I I I I I I I I Page 148 of 158 I Salem ODCM Rev. 27 FIGURE E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS I I 16S3 16 16AI.I lA I5A I 4SS2 1F Pge1 4 of15 HOPE CREEK'. ' ..I '~~~4S1 GENERATING

_" .. 4 ,

rwE GEERATING-." 5Sl12 1 I DELAWARE RIVER 11' 7 Page 149 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 I!!FIGURE E-2: OFFSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1-N 6 .NW 6'1 L! N O 2F NNE 40 A 3I CR buc HUREEK 6 _MB .nt ' s7 HUNRND180RRFD SWLOH 10 S 9 S 8S!!I i I Page 150 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX F MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS Page 151 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values -Liquid Effluents The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.Table F-i: Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Conc Insoluble Conc.([tCi/ml)

([aCi/ml)Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Arn-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1E-4 1E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb- 122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-124 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 1 E-4 1E-4 Sb-126 3E-6 3E-6 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-211 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-131 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 Bromine (35) Br-82 3E-4 4E-5 Br-83 3E-6 3E-6 Cadmium (48) Cd- 109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-115m 3E-5 3E-5 Cd- 115 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4 Ca-47 5E-5 3E-5 Californiumn (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 1E-5 3E-5 Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Cf-253 IE-4 1E-4 Cf-254 1E-7 1E-7 Page 152 of 158!I!I I I i I!I i I i!!

Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table F-I (Continued)

Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Cone.(jýtCi/mnl)

([ICi/ml)Carbon (6) C-14 8E-4 Cerium (58) Ce- 141 9E-5 9E-5 Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce- 144 1E-5 1E-5 Cesium (55) Cs-131 2E-3 9E-4 Cs-134m 6E-3 1E-3 Cs-134 9E-6 4E-5 Cs-135 IE-4 2E-4 Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Cs-137 2E-5 4E-5 Chlorine (17) CI-36 8E-5 6E-5 C1-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24) Cr-51 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4 Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1E-4 9E-5 Co-60 5E-5 3E-5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Crn-243 5E-6 2E-5 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 Cm-248 4E-7 1E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy- 165 4E-4 4E-4 Dy- 166 4E-5 4E-5 Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 1E-5 1E-5 Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 Erbium (68) Er- 169 9E-5 9E-5 Er-171 1E-4 IE-4 Europium (63) Eu-152 (9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5 Eu-152 (13 yrs) 8E-5 8E-5 Eu-154 2E-5 2E-5 Eu-155 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 IE-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5 Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 Page 153 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1 Table F-I (Continued)

Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(pCi/ml) (pCi/ml)Fluorine (9) F-18 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd-153 2E-4 2E-4 Gd-159 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79) Au- 196 2E-4 1E-4 Au- 198 5E-5 5E-5 Au- 199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf-181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho- 166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-113m 1E-3 1E-3 In-i 14m 2E-5 2E-5 In- 15m 4E-4 4E-4 In- 115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53) 1-125 2E-7 2E-4 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-130 3E-6 3E-6 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 1E-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir- 190 2E-4 2E-4 Ir- 192 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 Lanthanum (57) La- 140 2E-5 2E-5 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-210 IE-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu- 177 1 E-4 1 E-4 Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5 Mn-54 1E-4 IE-4 Mn-56 1E-4 1E-4 Mercury (80) Hg- 197m 2E-4 2E-4 Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 Hg-203 2E-5 1E-4 Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 154 of 158 I i Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table F-1 (Continued)

Element Isotope Soluble Cone. Insoluble Cone.(pCi/ml) (pCi/ml)Neodymium (60) Nd- 144 7E-5 8E-5 Nd-147 6E-5 6E-5 Nd-149 3E-4 3E-4 Neptunium.

(93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Np-239 1E-4 1E-4 Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Ni-65 1E-4 1E-4 Niobium (41) Nb-93m 4E-4 4E-4 Nb-95 1E-4 1E-4 Nb-97 9E-4 9E-4 Osmium (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd- 103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 Phosphorus (15) P-32 2E-5 2E-5 Platinum (78) Pt-191 1E-4 lE-4 Pt-193m 1E-3 1E-3 Pt-193 9E-4 2E-3 Pt-197m 1E-3 9E-4 Pt-197 1E-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-241 2E-4 1E-3 Pu-242 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-243 3E-4 3E-4 Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4 2E-5 Praseodymnium(59)

Pr-142 3E-5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 Promethium (61) Pm- 147 2E-4 2E-4 Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5 Protactinium(9

1) Pa-230 2E-4 2E-4 Pa-231 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1E-4 1E-4 Page 155 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 i Table F-1 (Continued)

Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(PtCi/ml)

([LCi/ml)Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 2E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-183 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh- 103m IE-2 1E-2 Rh- 105 1E-4 1E-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb-87 1E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru- 103 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-103m 3E-6 3E-6 Ru- 105 1E-4 1E-4 Ru-106 1E-5 lE-5 Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5 Sm- 151 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-153 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag- 105 1E-4 1E-4 Ag-110m 3E-5 3E-5 Ag- 11I 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 3E-5 Strontium (38) Sr-85rn 7E-3 7E-3 Sr-85 1 E-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur (16) S-35 6E-5 3E-4 Tantalum (73) Ta- 182 4E-5 4E-5 I I I I!!i I I 1 i I!I I i!I Page 156 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 Table F-I (Continued)

Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.([tCi/ml)

(ýtCi/ml)Technetium (43) Tc-96mn 1 E-2 1E-2 Tc-96 1E-4 5E-5 Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4 Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te- 125m 2E-4 1E-4 Te-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te- 129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te- 129 8E-4 8E-4 Te-131m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb- 160 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) TI-200 4E-4 2E-4 Tl-201 3E-4 2E-4 TI-202 1E-4 7E-5 T1-204 1E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2E-5 Th-228 7E-6 1E-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4 Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 Thulium (69) Tm- 170 5E-5 5E-5 Tm- 171 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn-113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Tungsten (74) W- 181 4E-4 3E-4 W-185 1E-4 1E-4 W-187 7E-5 6E-5 Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5 U-234 3E-5 3E-5 U-235 3E-5 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 Page 157 of 158 Salem ODCM Rev. 27 1 Table F-I (Continued)

Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(piCi/ml) (ptCi/ml)Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E-5 Ytterbium (70) Yb- 175 1 E-4 1 E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 Zinc (30) Zn-65 IE-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 Any single radio- 3E-6 3E-6 nuclide not listed above with decay mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission and with radio -active half-life greater than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission.Notes: 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 [LCi/ml.2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Determine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not in a mixture. The sum of such ratios for all the radionuclides in the mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity").Page 158 of 158 I I i I I I I I 1 I I!I I

ML14134A041

Contents

Text

4.0.1 Surveillance

4.0.3. Surveillances

1.2.1 Liquid

1.2.2 Conservative

0.5 allocated

3.3 Doses

Navigation menu

ML14134A041

Text

4.0.1 Surveillance

4.0.3. Surveillances

1.2.1 Liquid

1.2.2 Conservative

0.5 allocated

3.3 Doses

Navigation menu

Search