ML11195A147
| ML11195A147 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/2011 |
| From: | Paige J C Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Nazar M Florida Power & Light Co |
| Paige J C | |
| References | |
| TAC ME4549, TAC ME4550 | |
| Download: ML11195A147 (24) | |
Text
UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 29, 2011 Mr. Mano Nazar Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Florida Power and Light Company P.O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408-0420 TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 -ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS REGARDING CYBER SECURITY PROGRAM (TAC NOS. ME4549 AND ME4550)
Dear Mr. Nazar:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 245 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-31 and Amendment No. 241 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-41 for the Turkey Point Plant, Units Nos. 3 and 4, respectively.
The amendments are in response to your application dated July 28, 2010, as supplemented by letters dated September 27, November 19, 2010, and April 5, and June 30, 2011. These amendments cover the Cyber Security Plan (CSP), the CSP implementation schedule and revisions to the existing Facility Operating Licenses physical protection license condition.
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed.
The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. J n C. Paige, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251
Enclosures:
Distribution via Listserv UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT DOCKET NO. TURKEY POINT PLANT, UNIT AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING Amendment No. 245 Renewed License No. DPR-31 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: The application for amendment by Florida Power and Light Company (the licensee) dated July 28,2010, as supplemented by letters dated September 27 and November 19, 2010, and April 5 and June 30, 2011, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable reqUirements have been satisfied.
-2 Accordingly, the Renewed Facility License No. DPR-31 is amended as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 3.B of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-31 is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 245 are hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B is hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. Further, Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-31 is amended to add a new paragraph to license condition 3.E., which reads: The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved cyber security plan (CSP), including changes made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station CSP was approved by License Amendment No. 245. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.
The implementation of the cyber security plan (CSP), including the key intermediate milestone dates and the full implementation date, shall be in accordance with the implementation schedule submitted by the licensee on April 5, 2011, and approved by the NRC staff with this license amendment.
All subsequent changes to the NRC-approved CSP implementation schedule will require prior NRC approval pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Changes to the Operating Date of Issuance:
Jul y 29, 2011 UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT DOCKET NO. TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING Amendment No. 241 Renewed License No. DPR-41 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: The application for amendment by Florida Power and Light Company (the licensee) dated July 28, 2010, as supplemented by letters dated September 27 and November 19, 2010, and April 5 and June 30, 2011, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
Accordingly, the Renewed Facility License No. 41 is amended as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 3.B of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-41 is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 241 are hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B is hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. Further, Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-31 is amended to add a new paragraph to license condition 3.E., which reads: The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved cyber security plan (CSP), including changes made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station CSP was approved by License Amendment No. 241. This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.
The implementation of the cyber security plan (CSP), including the key intermediate milestone dates and the full implementation date, shall be in accordance with the implementation schedule submitted by the licensee on AprilS, 2011, and approved by the NRC staff with this license amendment.
All subsequent changes to the NRC-approved CSP implementation schedule will require prior NRC approval pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Operating License Date of Issuance:
Jul y 29, 2011 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 245 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. AMENDMENT NO. 241 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND Replace Pages 3 and 4 of Renewed Operating License DPR-31 with the attached Pages 3 and Replace Pages 3 and 4 of Renewed Operating License DPR-41 with the attached Pages 3 and Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 40 and 70 to receive, possess, and use at any time 100 milligrams each of any source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactively contaminated apparatus; Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of Turkey Point Units Nos. 3 and 4. This renewed operating license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations:
10 CFR Part 20, Section 30.34 of 10 CFR Part 30, Section 40.41 of 10 CFR Part 40, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of 10 CFR Part 50, and Section 70.32 of 10 CFR Part 70; and is subjectto all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect, and is subject to the additional conditions specified below: Maximum Power Level The applicant is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of 2300 megawatts (thermal). Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 245 are hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B is hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. Final Safety Analysis Report The licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report supplement submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 54.21 (d), as revised on November 1, 2001, describes certain future inspection activities to be completed before the period of extended operation.
The licensee shall complete these activities no later than July 19, 2012. The Final Safety Analysis Report supplement as revised on November 1, 2001, described above, shall be included in the next scheduled update to the Final Safety Analysis Report required by 10 CFR 50.71 (e)(4), following the issuance of this renewed license. Until that update is complete, the licensee may make changes to the programs described in such supplement without prior Commission approval, provided that the licensee evaluates each such change pursuant to the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50.59 and otherwise complies with the requirements in that section. Renewed License No. DPR-31 Amendment No. 245 Fire Protection FPL shall implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the approved Fire Protection Program as described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 and as approved in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) dated March 21, 1979 and supplemented by NRC letters dated April 3, 1980, July 9,1980, December 8,1980, January 26,1981, May 10,1982, March 27, 1984, April 16, 1984, August 12,1987, and by Safety Evaluations dated February 25, 1994, February 24, 1998, October 8, 1998, December 22,1998, May 4,1999, and May 5, 1999, subject to the following provision:
The licensee may make changes to the approved Fire Protection Program without prior approval of the Commission only if those changes would not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire. The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provision of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled: "Florida Power and Light & FPL Energy Seabrook Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan -Revision 3 "submitted by letter dated May 18, 2006. The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved cyber security plan (CSP), including changes made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station CSP was approved by License Amendment No. 245. 1. The licensee shall restrict the combined number of fuel assemblies loaded in the existing spent fuel pool storage racks and cask pit rack to no more than the capacity of the spent fuel pool storage racks. This condition applies at all times, except during activities associated with a reactor core offload/reload refueling condition.
This restriction will ensure the capability to unload and remove the cask pit rack when cask loading operations are necessary. The licensee shall establish two hold points within the rack installation procedure to ensure proper orientation of the cask rack in each unit's spent fuel pool. Verification of proper cask pit rack orientation will be implemented by an authorized Quality Control inspector during installation of the racks to ensure consistency with associated spent fuel pool criticality analysis assumptions.
Renewed License No. DPR-31 Amendment No. 245 Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 40 and 70 to receive, possess, and use at any time 100 milligrams each of any source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactively contaminated apparatus; Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of Turkey Point Units Nos. 3 and 4. This renewed operating license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations:
10 CFR Part 20, Section 30.34 of 10 CFR Part 30, Section 40.41 of 10 CFR Part 40, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of 10 CFR Part 50, and Section 70.32 of 10 CFR Part 70; and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect, and is subject to the additional conditions specified below: Maximum Power Level The applicant is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of 2300 megawatts (thermal). Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 241 are hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B is hereby incorporated into this renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. Final Safety Analysis Report The licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report supplement submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 54.21 (d), as revised on November 1,2001, describes certain future inspection activities to be completed before the period of extended operation.
The licensee shall complete these activities no later than April 10, 2013. The Final Safety Analysis Report supplement as revised on November 1, 2001, described above, shall be included in the next scheduled update to the Final Safety Analysis Report required by 10 CFR 50.71 (e)(4), following the issuance of this renewed license. Until that update is complete, the licensee may make changes to the programs described in such supplement without prior Commission approval, provided that the licensee evaluates each such change pursuant to the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50.59 and otherwise complies with the requirements in that section. Renewed License No. DPR-41 Amendment No. 241 Fire Protection FPL shall implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the approved Fire Protection Program as described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 and as approved in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) dated March 21, 1979 and supplemented by NRC letters dated April 3, 1980, July 9,1980, December 8,1980, January 26,1981, May 10,1982, March 27,1984, April 16, 1984, August 12, 1987, and by Safety Evaluations dated February 25, 1994, February 24, 1998, October 8, 1998, December 22, 1998, May 4, 1999, and May 5, 1999, subject to the following provision:
The licensee may make changes to the approved Fire Protection Program without prior approval of the Commission only if those changes would not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire. The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved physical security, training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provision of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The combined set of plans, which contains Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, is entitled: "Florida Power and Light & FPL Energy Seabrook Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan Revision 3, "submitted by letter dated May 18, 2006 The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved cyber security plan (CSP), including changes made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station CSP was approved by License Amendment No. 241. 1. The licensee shall restrict the combined number of fuel assemblies loaded in the existing spent fuel pool storage racks and cask pit rack to no more than the capacity of the spent fuel pool storage racks. This condition applies at all times, except during activities associated with a reactor core offload/reload refueling condition.
This restriction will ensure the capability to unload and remove the cask pit rack when cask loading operations are necessary. The licensee shall establish two hold points within the rack installation procedure to ensure proper orientation of the cask rack in each unit's spent fuel pool. Verification of proper cask pit rack orientation will be implemented by an authorized Quality Control inspector during installation of the racks to ensure consistency with associated spent fuel pool criticality analysis assumptions.
Renewed License No. DPR-41 Amendment No. 241
\.f-",II REGU, _ UNITED STATES "'V °11 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ... (') WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 0:( 0 ... 3: f/j l' 'l-Q *' ****-1' SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 245 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-31 AND AMENDMENT NO. 241 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-41 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT, UNIT NOS. 3 AND 4 DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND 50-251
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By application dated July 28, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 102250072), as supplemented by letters dated September 27 (ML 102790116), November 19, 2010 (ML 103420315), April 5 (ML 111040025), and June 30, 2011 (ML 11202A008), Florida Power and Light Company (FPL, the licensee) proposed an amendment to the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The license amendment would request approval of the licensee's Cyber Security Plan (CSP) and Implementation Schedule for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 73.54. On April 5, 2011, the licensee supplemented their CSP to address: (1) scope of systems in response to the October 21,2010, Commission decision (ML 102940009);
(2) records retention; and (3) implementation schedule.
The licensee submitted Revision 0 of the CSP incorporating all of the changes and/or additional information.
The supplements dated September 27, November 19,2010, April 5, and June 30,2011, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the NRC staffs original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on December 7,2010 (75 FR 76045).
2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION
2.1 General Requirements Consistent with 10 CFR 73.54(a), the licensee must provide high assurance that digital computer and communication systems, and networks are adequately protected against cyber attacks, up to and including the design-basis threat (DBT), as described in 10 CFR 73.1. The licensee shall protect digital computer and communication systems and networks associated with: (i) safety-related and important-to-safety functions; (ii) security functions; (iii) emergency preparedness functions, including offsite communications; and (iv) support systems and equipment which, if compromised, would adversely impact safety, security, or emergency Enclosure preparedness (SSEP) functions.
The rule specifies that digital computer and communication systems and networks associated with these functions must be protected from cyber attacks that would adversely impact the integrity or confidentiality of data and software; deny access to systems, services, or data; or provide an adverse impact to the operations of systems, networks, and associated equipment.
In the October 21,2010, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM)-COMWCO-1 0-0001, the Commission stated that the NRC's cyber security rule at 10 CFR 73.54 should be interpreted to include structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the balance of plant (BOP) that have a nexus to radiological health and safety.
The NRC staff determined that SSCs in the BOP that have a nexus to radiological health and safety are those that could directly or indirectly affect reactivity of a nuclear power plant (NPP), and are, therefore, within the scope of important-to-safety functions described in 10 CFR 73.54(a)(1).
2.2 Elements of a CSP As stated in 10 CFR 73.54(e), the licensee must establish, implement, and maintain a CSP that satisfies the Cyber Security Program requirements of this regulation.
In addition, the CSP must describe how the licensee will implement the requirements of the regulation and must account for the site-specific conditions that affect implementation.
One method of complying with this regulation is to describe within the CSP how the licensee will achieve high assurance that all SSEP functions are protected from cyber attacks. 2.3 Regulatory Guide (RG) 5.71 and Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 08-09, Revision 6 RG 5.71, "Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Facilities," describes a regulatory position that promotes a defensive strategy consisting of a defensive architecture and a set of security controls based on standards provided in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-53, "Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations" and NIST SP 800-82, "Guide to Industrial Control Systems Security," dated September 29, 2008. NIST SP 800-53 and NIST SP 800-82 are based on well-understood cyber threats, risks, and vulnerabilities, coupled with equally well understood countermeasures and protective techniques.
RG 5.71 divides the above-noted security controls into three broad categories:
technical, operational, and management.
RG 5.71 provides a framework to aid in the identification of those digital assets that licensees must protect from cyber attacks. These identified digital assets are referred to as "critical digital assets" (CDAs). Licensees should address the potential cyber security risks to CDAs by applying the defensive architecture and addressing the collection of security controls identified in RG 5.71. RG 5.71 includes a CSP template that provides one method for preparing an acceptable CSP. The organization of RG 5.71 reflects the steps necessary to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 73.54. Section C.3 of RG 5.71 describes an acceptable method for implementing the security controls, as detailed in Appendix B, "Technical Controls," and Appendix C, "Operational and Management Controls." Section C.4 of RG 5.71 discusses the need to maintain the established cyber security program, including comprehensive monitoring of the CDAs and the effectiveness of their security protection measures, ensuring that changes to the CDAs or the environment are controlled, coordinated, and periodically reviewed for continued protection from cyber attacks. Section C.5 of RG 5.71 provides licensees and applicants with guidance for retaining records
-3 associated with their cyber security programs.
Appendix A to RG 5.71 provides a template for a generic cyber security plan that licensees may use to comply with the licensing requirements of 10 CFR 73.54. Appendices Band C provide an acceptable set of security controls, which are based on well-understood threats, vulnerabilities, and attacks, coupled with equally well-understood and vetted countermeasures and protective techniques.
NEI 08-09, Revision 6 closely maps with RG 5.71; Appendix A of NEI 08-09, Revision 6 contains a cyber security plan template that is comparable to Appendix A of RG 5.71. Appendix D of NEI 08-09, Revision 6 contains technical cyber security controls that are comparable to Appendix B of RG 5.71. Appendix E of NEI 08-09, Revision 6 contains operational and management cyber security controls that are comparable to Appendix C of RG 5.71. The NRC staff stated in a letter (
Subject:
Nuclear Energy Institute
[NEI] 08-09, "Cyber Security Plan Template, Revision 6), dated May 5,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 101190371), that the licensee may use the template in NEI 08-09, Revision 6, to prepare an acceptable CSP, with the exception of the definition of "cyber attack." The NRC staff subsequently reviewed and approved by letter dated June 7,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 101550052), a definition for "cyber attack" to be used in submissions based on NEI 08-09, Revision 6. The licensee submitted a CSP for the Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 3 and 4 that was based on the template provided in NEI 08-09, Revision 6 and included a definition of cyber attack acceptable to the NRC staff in the "NEI 08-09 Clarifications" portion of Section 3.0, "Technical Evaluation" of Enclosure 1 to the April 5, 2011, submittal, "Evaluation of Proposed Changes." Additionally, the licensee submitted a supplement to their CSP on April 5, 2011, to include information on SSCs in the BOP that, if compromised, could affect NPP reactivity.
RG 5.71 and NEI 08-09, Revision 6 are comparable documents; both are based on essentially the same general approach and same set of technical, operational, and management security controls.
The submitted CSP was reviewed against the corresponding sections in RG 5.71. 3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION The NRC staff performed a technical evaluation of the licensee's submittal.
The licensee's submittal, with the exceptions of deviations described in Section 4.0, generally conformed to the guidance in NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which was found to be acceptable by the NRC staff and comparable to RG 5.71 to satisfy the requirements contained in 10 CFR 73.54. The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's submittal against the requirements of 10 CFR 73.54 following the guidance contained in RG 5.71. The NRC staffs evaluation of each section of their submittal is discussed below. 3.1 Scope and Purpose The licensee's CSP establishes a means to achieve high assurance that digital computer and communication systems and networks associated with the following functions are adequately protected against cyber attacks up to and including the DBT: Safety-related and important-to-safety functions; Security functions; Emergency preparedness functions, including offsite communications; and Support systems and equipment which, if compromised, would adversely impact SSEP functions.
The submitted CSP describes achievement of high assurance of adequate protection of systems associated with the above functions from cyber attacks by: Implementing and documenting the "baseline" security controls as described in Section 3.1.6 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.3 described in RG 5.71; and Implementing and documenting a Cyber Security Program to maintain the established cyber security controls through a comprehensive life cycle approach as described in Section 4 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Appendix A, Section A.2.1 of RG 5.71. Thus, the licensee's CSP, as originally submitted, is comparable to the CSP in NEI-08-09, Revision 6. However, in its submittal dated April 5, 2011, the licensee clarified its original submission and indicated that the scope of systems includes those BOP SSCs that have an impact on NPP reactivity if compromised.
This is in response to and consistent with SRM-COMWCO-1 0-0001, "Regulation of Cyber Security at Nuclear Power Plants," October 21,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 1 02940009) , in which the Commission stated that the NRC's cyber security rule at 10 CFR 73.54 should be interpreted to include SSCs in the BOP that have a nexus to radiological health and safety. The NRC staff determined that those systems that have a nexus to radiological health and safety are those that could directly or indirectly affect reactivity of a NPP, and are therefore within the scope of important-to-safety functions described in 10 CFR 73.54(a)(1).
On June 30, 2011, the licensee withdrew its clarification to NEI 08-09, Revision 6 regarding Emergency Preparedness functions within the scope of the CSP as provided in the July 28, 2010, licensee amendment request, Enclosure 1, Section 3.0. As a result, .the licensee has indicated that there is no deviation from NEI 08-09, Revision 6 relating to Preparedness The NRC staff reviewed the CSP and the supplemental information submitted by the and found no deviation from Regulatory Position C.3.3 in RG 5.71 and Appendix Section A.2.1 of RG 5.71. The NRC staff finds that the licensee established adequate to implement and document the Cyber Security Program, including baseline security Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately establishes the Cyber Program, including baseline security Analyzing Digital Computer Systems and Networks and Applying Cyber Security Controls The licensee's CSP describes that the Cyber Security Program is established, implemented, and maintained as described in Section 3.1 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1 described in RG 5.7.1 to: Analyze digital computer and communications systems and networks; and Identify those assets that must be protected against cyber attacks to satisfy 10 CFR 73.54(a).
-The submitted CSP describes how the cyber security controls in Appendices D and E of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which are comparable to Appendices Band C in RG 5.71, are addressed to protect CDAs from cyber attacks. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1 in RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately addresses security controls.
3.3 Cyber Security Assessment and Authorization The licensee provided information addressing the creation of a formal, documented, cyber security assessment and authorization policy. This included a description concerning the creation of a formal, documented procedure comparable to Section 3.1.1 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6. The NRC staff finds that the licensee established adequate measures to define and address the purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, and coordination, and facilitates the implementation of the cyber security assessment and authorization policy. The NRC staff reviewed the above information and found no deviation from Section 3.1.1 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.1 and Appendix A, Section A.3.1.1 in RG 5.71. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately established controls to develop, disseminate, and periodically update the cyber security assessment and authorization policy and implementing procedure.
3.4 Cyber Security Assessment Team (CSAT) The CSAT responsibilities include conducting the cyber security assessment, documenting key findings during the assessment, and evaluating assumptions and conclusions about cyber security threats. The submitted CSP outlines the requirements, roles and responsibilities of the CSA T comparable to Section 3.1.2 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6. It also states that the CSA T has the authority to conduct an independent assessment.
The submitted CSP describes that the CSA T will consist of individuals with knowledge about information and digital systems technology; NPP operations.
engineering, and plant technical specifications; and physical security and emergency preparedness systems and programs.
The CSAT description in the CSP is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.2 in RG 5.71. The submitted CSP lists the roles and responsibilities for the CSA T that included performing and overseeing the cyber security assessment process; documenting key observations; evaluating information about cyber security threats and vulnerabilities; confirming information obtained during tabletop reviews, walk-downs, or electronic validation of CDAs; and identifying potential new cyber security controls.
This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.2 in RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately establishes the requirements, roles and responsibilities of the CSAT.
-6 3.5 Identification of CDAs The submitted CSP describes that the licensee will identify and document CDAs and critical systems (CSs), including a general description, the overall function, the overall consequences if a compromise were to occur, and the security functional requirements or specifications as described in Section 3.1.3 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.3 of RG 5.71. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes the process to identify CDAs. 3.6 Examination of Cyber Security Practices The submitted CSP describes how the CSAT will examine and document the existing cyber security policies, procedures, and practices; existing cyber security controls; detailed descriptions of network and communication architectures (or network/communication architecture drawings);
information on security devices; and any other information that may be helpful during the cyber security assessment process as described in Section 3.1.4 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.2 of RG 5.71. The examinations will include an analysis of the effectiveness of the existing Cyber Security Program and cyber security controls.
The CSA T will document the collected cyber security information and the results of their examination of the collected information.
This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.2 in RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes the examination of cyber security practices.
3.7 Tabletop Reviews and Validation Testing The submitted CSP describes tabletop reviews and validation testing, which confirm the direct and indirect connectivity of each CDA and identify direct and indirect pathways to CDAs. The CSP states that validation testing will be performed electronically or by physical walkdowns.
The licensee's plan for tabletop reviews and validation testing is comparable to Section 3.1.5 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.4 of RG 5.71. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes tabletop reviews and validation testing. 3.8 Mitigation of Vulnerabilities and Application of Cyber Security Controls The submitted CSP describes the use of information collected during the cyber security assessment process (e.g., disposition of cyber security controls, defensive models, defensive strategy measures, site and corporate network architectures) to implement security controls in accordance with Section 3.1.6 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.3 and Appendix A.3.1.6 to RG 5.71. The CSP describes the process that will be applied in cases where security controls cannot be implemented.
The submitted CSP notes that before the licensee can implement security controls on a CDA, it will assess the potential for adverse impact in accordance with Section 3.1.6 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.3 of RG 5.71. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes mitigation of vulnerabilities and application of security controls.
3.9 Incorporating the Cyber Security Program into the Physical Protection Program The submitted CSP states that the Cyber Security Program will be reviewed as a component of the Physical Security Program in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(m).
This is comparable to Section 4.1 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.4 of RG 5.71. This section is comparable to Appendix A, Section A.3.2 in RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes review of the CSP as a component of the physical security program. 3.10 Cyber Security Controls The submitted CSP describes how the technical, operational and management cyber security controls contained in Appendices D and E of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, that are comparable to Appendices Band C in RG 5.71, are evaluated and dispositioned based on site-specific conditions during all phases of the Cyber Security Program. The CSP describes that many security controls have actions that are required to be performed on specific frequencies and that the frequency of a security control is satis'fied if the action is performed within 1.25 times the frequency specified in the control, as applied, and as measured from the previous performance of the action as described in Section 4.2 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Appendix A, Section A.3.1.6 in RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes implementation of cyber security controls.
3.11 Defense-in-Depth Protective Strategies The submitted CSP describes the implementation of defensive strategies that ensure the capability to detect, respond to, and recover from a cyber attack. The CSP specifies that the defensive strategies consist of security controls, defense-in-depth measures, and the defensive architecture.
The submitted CSP notes that the defensive architecture establishes the logical and physical boundaries to control the data transfer between these boundaries.
The licensee established defense-in-depth strategies by: implementing and documenting a defensive architecture as described in Section 4.3 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.2 in RG 5.71; a physical security program, including physical barriers; the operational and management controls described in Appendix E of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Appendix C to RG 5.71; and the technical controls described in Appendix D of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Appendix B to RG 5.71. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.2 and Appendix A, Section A.3.1.5 in RG 5.71 without deviation.
-S Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes implementation of defense-in-depth protective strategies.
3.12 Ongoing Monitoring and Assessment The submitted CSP describes how ongoing monitoring of cyber security controls to support CDAs is implemented comparable to Appendix E of NEI OS-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Positions C.4.1 and C.4.2 of RG 5.71. The ongoing monitoring program includes configuration management and change control; cyber security impact analysis of changes and changed environments; ongoing assessments of cyber security controls; effectiveness analysis (to monitor and confirm that the cyber security controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and achieving the desired outcome) and vulnerability scans to identify new vulnerabilities that could affect the security posture of CDAs. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Positions C.4.1 and C.4.2 of RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes ongoing monitoring and assessment.
3.13 Modification of Digital Assets The submitted CSP describes how cyber security controls are established, implemented, and maintained to protect CDAs. These security controls ensure that modifications to CDAs are evaluated before implementation that the cyber security performance objectives are maintained, and that acquired CDAs have cyber security requirements in place to achieve the site's Cyber Security Program objectives.
This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Section 4.5 of NEI OS-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Appendices A.4.2.5 and A.4.2.6 of RG 5.71. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes modification of digital assets. 3.14 Attack Mitigation and Incident Response The submitted CSP describes the process to ensure that SSEP functions are not adversely impacted due to cyber attacks in accordance with Section 4.6 of NEI OS-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Appendix C, Section C.S of RG 5.71. The CSP includes a discussion about creating incident response policy and procedures, and addresses training, testing, and drills, incident handling, incident monitoring, and incident response assistance.
It also describes identification, detection, response, containment, eradication, and recovery activities comparable to Section 4.6 of NEI OS-09, Revision 6. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Appendix C, Section C.S of RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes attack mitigation and incident response.
-9 3.15 Cyber Security Contingency Plan The submitted CSP describes creation of a Cyber Security Contingency Plan and policy that protects CDAs from the adverse impacts of a cyber attack described in Section 4.7 of NEI OS-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.3.2.7 and Appendix C.9 of RG 5.71. The licensee describes the Cyber Security Contingency Plan that would include the response to events. The plan includes procedures for operating CDAs in a contingency, roles and responsibilities of responders, processes and procedures for backup and storage of information, logical diagrams of network connectivity, current configuration information, and personnel lists for authorized access to CDAs. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.3.2.7 of RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes the cyber security contingency plan. 3.16 Cyber Security Training and Awareness The submitted CSP describes a program that establishes the training requirements necessary for the licensee's personnel and contractors to perform their assigned duties and responsibilities in implementing the Cyber Security Program in accordance with Section 4.S of NEI OS-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.3.2.S of RG 5.71. The CSP states that individuals will be trained with a level of cyber security knowledge commensurate with their assigned responsibilities in order to provide high assurance that individuals are able to perform their job functions in accordance with Appendix E of NEI OS-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.3.2.S of RG 5.71 and describes three levels of training:
awareness training, technical training, and specialized cyber security training.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes the cyber security training and awareness.
3.17 Evaluate and Manage Cyber Risk The submitted CSP describes how cyber risk is evaluated and managed utilizing site programs and procedures comparable to Section 4.9 of NEI OS-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position CA and Appendix C, Section C.13 of RG 5.71. The CSP describes the Threat and Vulnerability Management Program, Risk Mitigation, Operational Experience Program; and the Corrective Action Program and how each will be used to evaluate and manage risk. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Position CA and Appendix C, Section C.13 of RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes evaluation and management of cyber risk.
-3.18 Policies and Implementing Procedures The CSP describes development and implementation of policies and procedures to meet security control objectives in accordance with Section 4.10 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.5 and Appendix A, Section A.3.3 of RG 5.71. This includes the process to document, review, approve, issue, use, and revise policies and procedures.
The CSP also describes the licensee's procedures to establish specific responsibilities for positions described in Section 4.11 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Appendix C, Section C.10.10 of RG 5.71. This section of the CSP submitted by the licensee is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.5, Appendix A, Section A.3.3, and Appendix C, Section C.10.10 of RG 5.71 without deviation.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes cyber security policies and implementing procedures.
3.19 Roles and Responsibilities The submitted CSP describes the roles and responsibilities for the qualified and experienced personnel, including the Cyber Security Program Sponsor, the Cyber Security Program Manager, Cyber Security Specialists, the Cyber Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT), and other positions as needed. The CSIRT initiates in accordance with the Incident Response Plan and initiates emergency action when required to safeguard CDAs from cyber security compromise and to assist with the eventual recovery of compromised systems. Implementing procedures establish roles and responsibilities for each of the cyber security roles in accordance with Section 4.11 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.3.1.2, Appendix A, Section A.3.1.2, and Appendix C, Section C.1 0.1 0 of RG 5.71. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes cyber security roles and responsibilities.
3.20 Cyber Security Program Review The submitted CSP describes how the Cyber Security Program establishes the necessary procedures to implement reviews of applicable program elements in accordance with Section 4.12 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6, which is comparable to Regulatory Position C.4.3 and Appendix A, Section A.4.3 of RG 5.71. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes Cyber Security Program review. 3.21 Document Control and Records Retention and Handling The submitted CSP describes that the licensee has established the necessary measures and governing procedures to ensure that sufficient records of items and activities affecting cyber security are developed, reviewed, approved, issued, used, and revised to reflect completed work. The CSP described that superseded portions of certain records will be retained for at least 3 years after the record is superseded, while audit records will be retained for no less than
-11 12 months in accordance with Section 4.13 of NEI 08-09, Revision 6. However, this guidance provided by industry to licensees did not fully comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 73.54. In a letter dated February 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 110600204), NEI sent to the NRC proposed language for licensees' use to respond to the generic records retention issue, to which the NRC had no technical objection (
Reference:
Letter from NRC dated March 1, 2011, ADAMS Accession No. ML 110490337).
The proposed language clarified the requirement by providing examples (without providing an all-inclusive list) of the records and supporting technical documentation that are needed to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 73.54. All records will be retained until the Commission terminates the license, and the licensee shall maintain superseded portions of these records for at least 3 years after the record is superseded, unless otherwise specified by the Commission.
By retaining accurate and complete records and technical documentation until the license is terminated, inspectors, auditors, or assessors will have the ability to evaluate incidents, events, and other activities that are related to any of the cyber security elements described, referenced, and contained within the licensee's NRC-approved CSP. It will also allow the licensee to maintain the ability to detect and respond to cyber attacks in a timely manner, in the case of an event. In a letter dated April 5, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 111040025), the licensee responded to the records retention issue using the language proposed by NEI in its letter dated February 28, 2011. Therefore, the NRC staff finds this deviation from NEI 08-09, Revision 6 to be acceptable.
Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the language the licensee proposes to adopt provides for adequate records retention and will support the licensee's ability to detect and respond to cyber attacks. The NRC staff further finds that this section is comparable to Regulatory Position C.5 and Appendix A, Section A.5 of RG 5.71 without deviation.
Accordingly, the NRC staff finds that the CSP adequately describes cyber security document control and records retention and handling.
3.22 Implementation Schedule The submitted CSP provides a proposed implementation schedule for the Cyber Security Program. In a letter dated February 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 110600206), NEI sent to the NRC a template for licensees to use to submit their CSP implementation schedules, to which the NRC had no technical objection (
Reference:
Letter from NRC dated March 1, 2011, ADAMS Accession No. ML 110070348).
These key milestones include: Establish the CSAT; Identify CSs and CDAs; Install a deterministic one-way device between lower level devices and higher level devices; Implement the security control "Access Control for Portable and Mobile Devices"; Implement observation and identification of obvious cyber related tampering to existing insider mitigation rounds by incorporating the appropriate elements;
-Identify, document, and implement cyber security controls as per "Mitigation of Vulnerabilities and Application of Cyber Security Controls" for CDAs that could adversely impact the design function of physical security target set equipment; and Commence ongoing monitoring and assessment activities for those target set CDAs whose security controls have been implemented.
In its letter dated April 5, 2011, the licensee provided a revised implementation schedule using the NEI template.
The NRC staff considers this April 5, 2011, supplement the approved schedule as required by 10 CFR 73.54. Based on the provided schedule ensuring timely implementation of those protective measures that provide a higher degree of protection against radiological sabotage, the NRC staff concludes that the Cyber Security Program implementation schedule is satisfactory.
The NRC staff acknowledges that, in its submittal dated April 5, 2011, FPL proposed several CSP milestone implementation dates as regulatory commitments.
The NRC staff does not regard the CSP milestone implementation dates as regulatory commitments that can be changed unilaterally by the licensee, particularly in light of the regulatory requirement at 10 CFR 73.54, that "[i]mplementation of the licensee's cyber security program must be consistent with the approved schedule." As the NRC staff explained in its letter to all operating reactor licensees dated May 9, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 110980538), the implementation of the plan, including the key intermediate milestone dates and the full implementation date shall be in accordance with the implementation schedule submitted by the licensee and approved by the NRC. All subsequent changes to the NRC-approved CSP implementation schedule, thus, will require prior NRC approval pursuant in 10 CFR 50.90. 4.0 DIFFERENCES FROM NEI 08-09, REVISION 6 In addition to the differences identified in Section 3.0, "Technical Evaluation" found in Enclosure 1 to the licensee's submittal dated April 5, 2011, the NRC staff notes the following additional differences between the licensee's submission and NEI 08-09, Revision 6: In Section 3.1, "Scope and Purpose," the licensee clarified the definition of important-to-safety functions, consistent with SRM-COMWCO-10-0001. In Section 3.21, "Document Control and Records Retention and Handling," the licensee clarified the definition of records and supporting documentation that will be retained to conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 73.54. In Section 3.22, "Implementation Schedule," the licensee submitted a revised implementation schedule, specifying the interim milestones and the final implementation date, including supporting rationale.
The NRC staff finds all of these deviations to be acceptable as discussed in the respective sections.
5.0 STATE CONSULTATION
Based upon a letter dated May 2,2003, from Michael N. Stephens of the Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control, to Brenda L. Mozafari, Senior Project Manager,
-13 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the State of Florida does not desire notification of issuance of license amendments.
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION The amendments change a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2010 (75 FR 76045). Also, these amendments relate to safeguards matters and do not involve any significant construction impacts, and relate to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements.
Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9), (10), and (12). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
7.0 CONCLUSION
The NRC staff's review and evaluation of the licensee's CSP was conducted using the staff positions established in the relevant sections of RG 5.71. Based on the NRC staff's review, the NRC finds that the licensee addressed the relevant information necessary to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 73.54, 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), 10 CFR 73.55(b)(8), and 10 CFR 73.55(m), as applicable and that the licensee's Cyber Security Program provides high assurance that digital computer and communication systems and networks associated with the following are adequately protected against cyber attacks, up to and including the DBT as described in 10 CFR 73.1. This includes protecting digital computer and communication systems and networks associated with: (i) safety-related and important-to-safety functions; (ii) security functions; (iii) emergency preparedness functions, including offsite communications; and (iv) support systems and equipment which, if compromised, would adversely impact SSEP functions.
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes the information in this CSP to be acceptable and upon successful implementation of this program, operation of the Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4, will not be inimical to the common defense and security.
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. Principal Contributor:
Monika Coflin, NSIR Date: July 29, 2011 July 29, 2011 Mr. Mano Nazar Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Florida Power and Light Company P.O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408-0420 SUB..TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 -ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS REGARDING CYBER SECURITY PROGRAM (TAC NOS. ME4549 AND ME4550)
Dear Mr. Nazar:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 245 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-31 and Amendment No. 241 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-41 for the Turkey Point Plant, Units Nos. 3 and 4, respectively.
The amendments are in response to your application dated July 28, 2010, as supplemented by letters dated September 27, November 19, 2010, and April 5, and June 30. 2011. These amendments cover the Cyber Security Plan (CSP), the CSP implementation schedule and revisions to the existing Facility Operating Licenses physical protection license condition.
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed.
The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251
Enclosures:
Distribution via Listserv Distribution:
PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsOgcRp RidsNrrLABClayton RidsN rrPMT u rkeyPoint RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsNrrDorlDpr Sincerely, IRA! Jason C. Paige, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation M. Coflin, NSIR P. Pederson, NSIR T. Wengert, NRR B. Singal, NRR RidsNrrDirsltsb RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter ADAMS Accession No ML 11195A147
- via memo OFFICE LPL2-2/PM LPL2-2/LA NSIR/DSPI OGC NLO LPL2-2/BC CSIRB/BC NAME JPaige BClayton C. Erlanger' LSubin (wI DBroaddus comments)
DATE 07/18/11 07/18/11 07/06/11 07/25/11 07/29/11 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY