ML12018A168

University of California - Irvine, Revised Annual Report for the Uci Nuclear Reactor Facility, Covering the Period July 1st 2010 Through June 30th 2011

ML12018A168
Person / Time
Site:	University of California - Irvine
Issue date:	01/04/2012
From:	Miller G E University of California - Irvine
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML12018A168 (11)

Text

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE BERKELEY

• DAVIS

• IRVINE

• LOSANGELES

• RIVERSIDE

• SANDIEGO SAN FRANCISCO (PV, SANTA BARBARA

• SANTACRUZ George E. Miller IRVINE, CA 92697-2025 Senior Lecturer Emeritus (949) 824-6649 Department of Chemistry and FAX: (949) 824-6082 or (949) 824-8571 Director, Nuclear Reactor Facility Internet:

GEMILLER@uci.edu January 4, 2012 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Docket 50-326; License R-116 Annual Report Submittal, Tech Spec 6.7f Gentlemen:

Please find enclosed three (3) copies of a revised annual report for the UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility, covering the period July 1st 2010 through June 30th 2011. We regret that this report included some minor errors when first submitted.

Please discard all former copies and replace with these new ones. Thank you.Sincerely, George E. Miller Reactor Supervisor Cc.,w/enc

(*electronic copies)American Nuclear Insurance, 95 Glastonbury Blvd, Glastonbury CT 06033, Policy NF-176 Dean of Physical Sciences, Ken Janda*Greg Schoenebeck, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

• Spiros Traiforos, Project Manager, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

• Reactor Operations Committee Members, UCI AoZQ U. C. IRVINE Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report for July 1st, 2010 to June 3 0 th 2011 Facility License R-1 16 Docket 50-326 Prepared in Accordance with Part 6.7f of the Facility Technical Specifications revised January 2012 by Dr. G. E. Miller Reactor Supervisor UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page I Section 1. Operations Summary Operation of this facility supports UCI research and education programs in the Department of Chemistry (CHEM) and the Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science (ChEMS).Research is being conducted in application of radioisotopes as tracers and radiochemical analytical and separation techniques including applications to nuclear waste separations (ChEMS).Reactor utilization, apart from operator training and maintenance, is for analytical sample irradiation and production of isotopic tracers. Analysis samples come from diverse origins related to forensic science, fossil fuels, geochemistry, art, and archaeological studies, chemical separations in nuclear fuel cycle experiments, chemical synthesis, industrial quality control, enzyme studies, trace element pollution studies, etc. The reactor is also used in class work by undergraduates learning tracer and activation analysis techniques using small quantities of short-lived activated materials.

Enrollment in the Fall Quarter 2010 laboratory course in Radioisotope Techniques using the facility was 32 students with 2 graduate teaching assistants, who also learned these techniques.

Use is also made of the facility by other educational institutions, both for research and for visits/tours A modest Nuclear Science Outreach program (NSOP) using UCI students to present talks and a laboratory to middle and high school classes has been continued.

This program has also involved tours, class demonstrations, and analyses of samples submitted by faculty. In this period, NSOP received no direct financial support.A grant from the Department of Energy was awarded to enable refurbishment of some auxiliary equipment (continuous air monitor samplers, automatic sample changer) and construction of a sample irradiation loop for flowing liquids, and a bum-up fuel element monitor instrument.

Operations have continued at the increased level experienced last year. Criticality was achieved for 128.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />, and the total energy generated was equivalent to 71 hours8.217593e-4 days <br />0.0197 hours <br />1.173942e-4 weeks <br />2.70155e-5 months <br /> at full steady state power. 103 separate experiments were performed, and over 2000 samples were irradiated (sometimes multiple samples are included in a single capsule and are not always separately logged).8 moderate level mixed isotope shipments were made, all Yellow I1 category.

No pulse operations have been performed.

Three 50.59 changes were approved this year: (i) revision of the facility ventilation system, (ii) installation of a new pool level meter and alarm, (iii) installation of new seismic switch/scram unit. In addition, a new pumping system for ground water adjacent to the reactor tank was installed.

No unusual surveillance results/activities were conducted during this period.An NRC general inspection was carried out from December 1 2 th -1 5 th 2010. One Notice of Violation was received regarding the requirement to conduct emergency drills at the facility itself. In 2010-11, Reactor Operations Committee meetings were held on July 8th 2010 and February 8th 2011 in accordance with Technical Specification schedule requirements.

No follow-ups or incidents have been forthcoming regarding security or emergency response.An exercise/training was held March 16 h, 2011 for the UCI EH&S radiological personnel and reactor operators with debriefing and evaluation as related to response to a laboratory radiation spill event also involving personnel injury.Inspections/audits continue to be conducted quarterly by the Radiation Protection staff of EH&S at UCI. These have identified that frequency schedules have been properly maintained, and results continue to show absence of significant levels of contamination or personnel exposure.Operator examinations during the year (October 2010 and March 2011) resulted in the licensing of 3 new individuals as SRO's, and I RO. As of June 3 0 1h 2011, 3 SRO's were active. I SRO needed requalification, and the RO was inactive and had moved away.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 2 Section 2. Data Tabulations for the Period July 1 st, 2010 to June 30th, 2011 TABLE I.Experiment Approvals on file Experiments performed (including repeats)Samples irradiated Energy generated this period (Megawatt hours)Total, 69 element core = 127.0>74 element core = 1369.6 Total energy generated since initial criticality Pulse operation this period Total reactor pulses to 6/30/11 3 103 2198+17.7 Hours critical this period.Total hours critical to date Inadvertent scrams or unplanned shutdowns or events at power Visitors to reactor -as individuals or in tour groups -Maximum dosimeter recorded for visitors -all less than Visiting researchers (dosimeter issues)Maximum exposure recorded at one visit Visiting researchers (badged)Students and teaching assistants in class, badged Exposures reported for quarter (range: 0-30 mrem) average Isotope Shipments this period (mixed act'n products = 12 millicuries total)1496.6 Mwh 0 978 128.5 8694.0 4 425 0.2 mrem 5 26.2 mrem 10 34 21 mrem 8 TABLE II Reactor Core Status 6/30/11 (core configuration unchanged from 6/30/10)Fuel elements in core (including 2 fuel followers)

Fuel elements in storage (reactor tank -used)Fuel elements unused (4 instrumented elements + 1 element + I FFCR)Graphite reflector elements in core Graphite reflector elements in reactor tank storage Water filled fuel element positions Experimental facilities in core positions Non-fuel control rods Total core positions accounted for Core excess, cold, no xenon (as of 6/22/2011)

Control rod worths (calibrated 8/25/2010)

REG $2.70 SHIM $3.42 ATR $1.62 FTR $0.66 Total: $8.40 Maximum possible pulse insertion (calculated)

Maximum peak power recorded (no pulse operation during this period)Maximum peak temperature recorded in pulse (B-ring)82 25 6 34 0 6 4 2 127$2.43$2.28-Mw 0_C UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 3 Section 3.Inadvertent Scrams, Unplanned Shutdowns, Events at Power TABLE 1II.Date Time Power Type and Cause 2010 09/30 09:20 -80 w 09/30 10:45 -25 w Linear scram. Auto ranging didn't switch up at 75 watt range at fast period about 5 sec. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO Linear scram, repeat of above at 25 w range. Operators warned to use lower periods. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.2011 1/12 13:50 -75w 3/16 15:50 < 2.5 w Period scram trainee operator error during raising power to 25 kw.Restart authorized by SRO.Period scram. Operator error in start-to critical..

Relatively high Xe in core, operator misled as to appropriate rod positions.

Restart authorized.

UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 4 Section 4 Maintenance and Surveillance and Other Incidents The following non-routine maintenance/surveillance activities were carried out during this period.Any reactor operation related items have been included above and are not repeated here.2010 August 1 9 th Power calibration run at 200 kilowatts indicated power (WRLM). Found 80.8% of"250 kilowatts.

Only very slight adjustments made to WRM and PRM) to match WRLM.August 25th October 4 th -2 6 th. Operation was suspended while new routing valves and roof ducting were installed for the revised exhaust/ventilation system. (see section 5 for further details)./

2011 February 22- March 9 th Installation of new pit pump (Grundfos SQE) for ground water removal at west end of reactor room. New controller system allows start time/delay.

Pump shuts off when dry. Pump base level is at 34 feet below floor level (reactor tank is 25 feet deep).March 1 0 th Rowland Hall emergency power circuits disabled to install new auto transfer switch wiring. On restart, the back-up battery in the diesel generator room exploded.

Reactor UPS on security/rad safety equipment only lasted 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />. Manual observation maintained with no reactor operations.

Systems all restored and functional after about 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> down time, from 3 am to 7:30 am. Reactor personnel were in attendance during that time.March 2 2"d Two old security sensors (radar type) in control room that were failing were replaced with new PIR sensors -functionally equivalent.

Performance verified as meeting and exceeding former coverage.April 7 th Fuel rack used for complete core unload was removed from the pool, and dismantled for storage until needed further. (Rack has not been used for many years)April 5t' -15th New stainless steel Flexmaster connectors installed in both water cooling and purification pump systems to replace former galvanized ones that were beginning to show corrosion.

All functionally equivalent.

May 3 0 th New seismic switch/scram

('Mitigator")

was installed, tested and placed in service. Trip Setting was 3%g in each of 3 dimensions.

UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 5 Section 5 Facility Changes and Special Experiments Approved The ROC approved the following changes according to 50.59 procedures, during this period.(i) revision of the facility ventilation system, now tied in to main building exhausts with large exhaust fans creating high plume level and large dilution factor.(ii) installation of a new pool level meter and alarm, level now set at 12 inches below tank top.(iii) installation of new seismic switch/scram unit.In addition, a new pumping system for ground water adjacent to the 'reactor tank was installed to maintain lower levels of ground water around the reactor tank. Radioactivity measurements of this water indicate natural decay products with no activities relating to reactor operations.

No special or unusual experiments were approved or carried out.A new experiment number was authorized, but only in order to better track work by Prof.Nilsson's group. The experiments were the same as those previously authorized using other experiment numbers and involved sample activation.

New procedures (approved by the UCI RSO) were implemented to track sample materials transferred from the reactor facility to Prof Nilsson's laboratories in Engineering Tower.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 6 Section 6. Radioactive Effluent Release.(a) Gases.The major direct release to the environs is Argon-41 produced during normal operations.

Very small amounts of other gases may be released from irradiated materials in experiments.

Releases are computed based on original measurements at point of origin within the facility and taking only dilution into account. Since much of the release is from operation of the pneumatic transfer system for samples, this is a conservative estimate in that assumption is made that all use of the PT is at full steady state power level (250 kW) when, in fact, considerable use is with the reactor at a lower power level. In view of the small numbers involved, and the fact that an integrated dose check is provided by an environmental dosimeter (CaSO 4-Dy) hanging directly in the exhaust at the point of stack discharge, it is considered unnecessary to provide further checks of these estimates.

The dosimeter data confirm that an individual standing directly in the exhaust flow for one year would receive an additional submersion dose from the exhaust less than the reliability limit of the dosimeters, or less than 20 mrem per year. The dosimeter data are presented separately in Section 7, Table IV. Over the years that data have been collected, the accumulated exposure at the exhaust locations have been lower than for "control" points because of lower masses of concrete structures in the vicinity.

In fact the data have been consistently at 20-25 mrem per year below background level, so confidence of exposure less than 5 mrem over background seems possible.Release estimates based on operational parameters are as follows: (1) Operation of pneumatic transfer system (7/1/10-6/30/11):

a. Minutes of operation:

223 minutes b. Release rate assumed: 6. x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1.2 x 108 mL/min**.Total release computed: (a x b x c) = 1.6 x 103 microcuries (2) Release from pool surface (7/1/10-6/30/11):

a. Total hours of operation at full power (Mwh x 4) = 71.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> b. Release rate assumed: <1. x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1.2 x 108 mL/min**.Total release computed: (a x 60 x b x c) = 7.1 x 10 3 microcuries

d. Total of(1) and (2) emission in 1 year = 5.1 x 103 microcuries

e. Total effluent released in 1 year (525960 minutes/yr.

x c) = 6.3 x 1013 mL**Concentration averaged over 12 months (die) = -< 0.8 x 10-10 microcuries/mL

-10 Since 20 x 10 microcuries/mL provides an annual exposure for constant immersion of 10 mrem, this corresponds to < 0.4 mrem potential additional radiation exposure to an individual standing breathing in the effluent stack for the entire year.This computation assumes the prior ventilation system was in place for the entire annual period and no dilution of the plume at or beyond the release point. It also conservatively assumes all reactor operations were at 250 kw power, whereas significant operation time was at lower power levels.** From October 28th 2010, new ventilation exhaust provisions were made at this facility.

The exhaust is now diluted by a factor of 100 before release and the mixed plume is released at -100 feet above the roof level (200 feet above surrounding ground. So the estimates could be reduced by a factor of 100 for the half-year period. Since the levels were already well below allowed levels, this was not done.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 7 Section 6. (continued)(b) Liquids and Solids.Liquid and solid wastes from utilization of by-product materials are disposed through a university contract.

Waste is transferred to the custody of UCI Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S). Disposals to this custody are given below. It is important to note that activity values are estimated at the time of transfer to EH&S control. Since few shipments are being made from campus, decay to negligible levels occurs for all medium-lived radionuclides.

Teaching course items (used for training in liquid scintillation counting techniques) may be a mixture of reactor generated byproducts and purchased materials (exclusively "aC and 3 H).DRY WASTES: One transfer of 2 cubic foot container of dry waste were disposed during this period (7/1 /10 through 6/30/11) estimated at a total quantity in 2 cu ft of 0.10 millicuries of mixed activation products (measured as 6 0 Co equivalent at time of transfer).

LIQUIDS: No transfers mad in this period. No 14C was disposed or purchased this year.Section 7.Environmental Surveillance.

Calcium Sulfate/Dysprosium thermoluminescent dosimeters have been placed at nine locations around the UCI Campus for many years. Starting July 1 2004, these are provided by Global Dosimetry Solutions (GDS), Costa Mesa, California.

The GDS packs have three chips in each pack which are averaged for exposure recording.

One pack is kept on the edge of campus in a wood frame house in University Hills. GDS also runs multiple control samples. All dosimeters are housed in small metal lock-boxes (except for location 10). The table below lists the locations since 2007. As of January 2011, 3 locations for monitoring exhaust flows on the 3 building exhaust fans were established.

These replaced locations

1. 5 and #9 above and added one new location.

(#11) An additional dosimeter has been located in the control room (# 12), for a total of 12.Routine contamination surveys consisting of wipe tests and G-M surveys have shown mostly a "clean" facility with significant, removable contamination only in areas coming into direct contact with samples removed from the reactor, and on sample handling tools. Trash is surveyed before disposal and not disposed unless found to be free of removable and fixed contamination.

Table of Locations for Environmental Dosimeter Packs.1. Below window of reactor room south wall (outside the facility).

2. In hallway on exterior of west wall of facility (inside building).

3. On exterior (north) wall of reactor room -on loading dock.4. Rowland Hall, room 156 doorway, (over reactor facility).

5. Exhaust air flow from reactor room, roof level (hung in center of duct).6. McGaugh Hall, hall doorway to laboratory 5346.7. Langson library across campus, Room 547 closet exterior door.8. Reines Hall, Gas cylinder storage door, room 5001.9. Fume hood exhaust, roof level, from reactor laboratory (hung in center of duct).10. 12 Perkins Court, University Hills, private residence (wood frame house).UC1 Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 8 TABLE IV.Environmental Dosimetry Data.2010-2011 Average Total Exposures in mrem (including "control background")

Location.Annual Prior year 1. S. Facility perimeter 2. W. Facility perimeter 3. N Facility perimeter 4. Hallway over facility 5 .Facility main air exhaust 6. McGaugh Hall top floor 7. Langson Library top floor 8. Reines Hall top floor 92. Facility fume hood exh.10. On-campus housing 11 Building exhaust 3 12 Control Room Background control (GDS)2/10 3/10 4/10 1/11 Total 20010/11 28 29 24 .29 110 28 26 26 29 109 29 30 26 30 115 25 26 22 28 101 25 24 22 26 97 26 28 25 28 107 31 31 26 34 122 29 29 25 30 113 26 26 22 26 100 23 29 22 26 100 29 31 26 31 117 Totals 2009/10 128 105 123 103 98 101 130 113 101 99 119 Excess( 10- 11)over control nmr ANNUAL-7-8-2-16-20-10 5-4-17-17 Added 4/2011 Added 4-2011 0 Discussion Raw data is presented here, along with controls and prior year comparisons.

Within this range, the data vary with significant consistency.

Locations 1, 3, and 7 are usually the highest, 10 the lowest.Data for this year reflects several issues: " all but location 7 are less than GDS control background level." Location 7 is on the top floor of a large building and may experience greater cosmic flux, as well as concrete releases." Location 3 is on a heavy concrete wall.* Location I is a hallway with an extremely low occupancy rate. (See additional note below)." In spite of increased operations, levels remain statistically within range of previous year." Note 1. Location as of Nov 2010, now building exhaust I" Note 2. Location as of Nov 2010, now building exhaust 2 Exposure estimated to a single individual in an uncontrolled area at this facility is still very minimal.Locations I and 2 are in hallways with extremely minimal occupancy or travel, especially since security policy is to maintain permanently locked doors to the hallways on this floor level (access only to individuals with building keys). The rooms overhead (location

4) are casually occupied by very few individuals (one or two at the most) in the space above the reactor core. The air released from the facility/building (measured by locations

1. 5 and #9) continues to give no detectable exposure above background.

Over many years, the data at each specific location has shown remarkable consistency.

The net conclusion is that, within precision of measurement, and compared to distant control areas (numbers 7 and 10), we are operating with very minimal levels (within statistical error of zero) of potential (full 24/7 occupancy) public exposure over normal background levels.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 9 Section 8. Radiation Exposure to Personnel.

Personnel exposure data are summarized in Table V.UCI issued TLD badges to UCI students or researchers regularly utilizing radiation.

Finger dosimetry (TLD) rings are also issued to personnel who might be regularly handling radioactive sources.TLD's are read quarterly by Global Dosimetry Solutions, and results are presented in Table Va. Data are for 4 quarters of operations since April 1, 2010. Reporting categories are DEEP, EYE, and SHALLOW. Other individuals visiting or casually working in the facility were issued DOSIMAN/R for which results are shown in Table Vb. 5 persons were issued TLD badges on a continual basis; 3 were also issued with finger TLDs. 32 students and 2 teaching assistants in a Radioisotope Techniques class were TLC badged. Reported exposures fell in a narrow range averaging 21 mrem each person for the quarter.Table Vb. also lists all visiting individuals that were issued with DOSIMAN/R monitors that record in units of 0.1 mR. In the course of a few hours, a worker can accumulate 0.2 mr. A tour visitor accumulates 0.0 or 0.1 mR during a 45 minute visit to the facility.

Any reading above 0.2 is thus tabulated separately.

TABLE Va.Personnel Exposure Report Summary for 12 months: 4/1/10 to 3/30/Il (in millirem)Individuals Whole Body Finter Rin DEEP EYE SHALLOW hlow I1 10 10 10 430 22 35 35 35 188 2 3 0 0 0 Totals 45 45 45 618 344 Range 13-29 (mean 21) Range 13-29 (mean 21) Range 13-29 (mean 2 I) not issued class total 726 726 726 Totals 771 771 771 618 (39 individuals)

(39 individuals)

(39 individuals)

(2 persons)Aggregated non-zero data from self-reading dosimeters issued to researchers or visitors in addition to TLD badges are: Persons Admissions Total Accumulation (per person) (mrem)1' 5 33.9 223 other visitors logged (I each) 1.9 207 in tour I each 0.0 to 0. 1 each monitor Summation (430 persons) 346 35.8 mrem I. Individuals doing extensive or casual activation analysis and radiochemical work at the facility.

Most of the exposure is a result of CI-38 or AI-28 radioactivity production.

2. Individuals receiving exposure as a result of shipping isotopes, and/or calibration activities in the facility.3. Individuals who did enter but not carry out radiation related activities during this period, so any exposure reported is an indication of range of general background/precision where the badges are stored when not in use.4. Reported for students and teaching assistants in Radioisotope Techniques class Jan-Mar 201 1. Note badges kept 24/7 in laboratory room. All also ran samples by NAA as well as working with sealed sources.5. Issuing I dosimeter each for groups up to 10 and 10 randomly for larger groups. No readings > 0. I mrem were recorded.Personnel exposures continue to be very low at this facility in keeping with ALARA efforts. Fewer isotope shipments have been made this year, so exposure from that activity is lower.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 Page 10