ML16134A578

5/2/16, Meeting Slides for Pre-Submittal Meeting Regarding License Amendment Request Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (Mur) Power Uprate

ML16134A578
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	05/02/2016
From:	Energy Northwest
To:	John Klos Plant Licensing Branch IV
Klos L J
References
Download: ML16134A578 (11)

Text

Columbia Generating StationPre-Submittal MeetingLicense Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)

Power UprateMay 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager2 AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions3 Background4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM

ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 20085 LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals6 Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation8LEFM Modes of OperationPower LevelLEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at 3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in CheckOR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to CheckOR Reduce powerto 3486 MWtN/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017)9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?11 Columbia Generating StationPre-Submittal MeetingLicense Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)

Power UprateMay 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager2 AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions3 Background4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM

ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 20085 LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals6 Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation8LEFM Modes of OperationPower LevelLEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at 3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in CheckOR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to CheckOR Reduce powerto 3486 MWtN/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017)9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?11