ML18032A188

Comment (38) of M. Anderson on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities

ML18032A188
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	01/02/2018
From:	Mary Anderson - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00038, NRC-2017-0211, NUREG-2215
Download: ML18032A188 (2)

Text

As of: 1/8/18 4:34 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pd-wu46 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On:. NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG ' Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0039 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 '***-*----*-**--**------** ***-** --....... **---*-* . **-**--* -*---.. -.. ***-**-** ..... ----****--.----**--********---*--***-** ---***------*-,-. -------*----****-------------**-** -**-* Submitter Information <&-2 F~ 529'/tf Name: MAnderson General Comment Comments to NRC Docket ID NRC-2017-0211, NUREG-2215

• JJ /J$/2tJl7 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= :Y-er:-}'J'l-eySm~ fl, { Jt;S V NRC Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Draft, November 2017 https://www.nrc.gov/docs/MLI 731/MLI 73IOA693.pdf J have just learned about the NUREG-2215 document today and see that today is the last day to comment on this lengthy 615 page report. I am glad to see the NRC is developing 'New Regulations for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities' and truly hope these new regulations have incorporated many concerns. I feel a sense of URGENCY regarding my concerns as one of 8.5 million citizens living in the area (50 mile plume zone) of the impending Dry Cask Storage at the San Onofre Nucle'ar Generating Station in Southern California. I respectfully ask for consideration to IMMEDIATELY OVERRULE the California Coastal https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectid=0900006482d8fc12&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018 Page 2 of2 Commissions permit to bury this highly toxic waste and deny the license of Edison's Holtec UMAX ISFSI facility. -108 feet from the Ocean in an earthquake tsunami-inundation prone zone -In a highly trafficked freeway and railway zone. -In thin walled Canisters only guaranteed for 25 years from the manufacturer when this radioactive waste is lethal for over 200,000 years. -In Canisters that cannot be monitored for leaks. -In a storage system designed to be built "below ground". However, due to the water table there, the plan is to bury the canisters only partially below ground. I support SanOnofreSafety.org's comments submitted by Donna Gilmore. I am of the understanding that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's job is Protecting the People and the Environment, as your logo states and I implore you to make a conscious decision to stop Southern California Edison from placing the people of San Juan Capistrano, the surrounding communities and the environment from a potential disaster. Thank you for your time and immediate consideration, M. Anderson Orange County, CA https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8fc l 2&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018