IR 05000358/1978015

IE Inspec Rept 50-358/78-15,on 780718-21 & 780809-11 During Which No Items of Noncompliance Were Noted.Major Areas Inspected Included:Preoper Test Prog Organization & Status of Constr Re Preoper Test Prog

ML20147B910
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	08/11/1978
From:	Maura F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
References
50-358-78-15, NUDOCS 7810110220
Download: ML20147B910 (5)

Text

[

J9

..

. .

U.S.LNUCLEAR REGULATORY' COMMISSION 0FFICE OF INSPECTION.AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

'

Report No;-50-358/78-15 Docket No. 50-358 License No. CPPR-8 .

Licensee: Cincinnati Cas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, OH '45201

'

Facility Name: 'Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit-1 Inspection At; Zine.er Site,' Moscow, OH Inspection Conducted: July 18-21.and' August 9-11, 1978 Inspector:..F. A. Maura Approved By: J. F. Streeter, Chief Nuclear Support Section 1 Inspection Summary Inspection on July 18-21 and August 9-11, 1978 (Report No. 50-358/78-15)

Areas Inspected: Preoperational test program organization and adminis-tration, and the status'of construction,as it relates to the pre- ,

operational test program. The inspection involved.53 inspector-hours  !

onsite byfone NRC inspecto Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie j

>

I

$

>

'5

, r

...

1 0' t 9 1. 1. 9 n. 3, o l

!

i

!

.. .- . , _ . . . . . . zu . . _ . - .. . _ . _ . . . . . . . . , - . . . . _ . _ . _ . . . ..._a_.,..__-._.,....s

r

.

.

.

DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted

• J. Schott, Station Superintendent

• W. Schwierc, Principal QA and Standards Engineer

• P. King, Assistant Superintendent

• S. Martin, Test Coordinator

• J. Wald, Station Quality Engineer R. Price, Training Supervisor G. Anderson, EPD System Turnover Coordinator The inspector also interviewed other licensee employees including members of the administrative, technical, operating and construction staff * Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Preoperational Test Program The inspector reviewed the discussed with the licensee the following procedures:

ZPSI-SUM-0 Preoperational and Startup Testing Manual, Revisions 1 and 2 SU.ACP.01 Preparation of Startup Administrative Procedures, Revisions 1 and 2 SU.ACP.04 Preparation, Review, Approval and Revision To Preoperational Test Procedures, Revisions 0 and 1 SU.ACP.05 Conduit of Preoperational Tests, Revision 0 SU.ACP.06 Preparation of Project Procedures, Revisions 1 and 2 SU.ACP.07 Qualifications of Preop and Startup Test Personnel, Revisions 1 and 2 SU.ACP.08 Generation and Control of The System Index Text Matrix, Revisions 0 and 1 SU.ACP.09 Surisdictional Blue Tagging of Systems,

'

Revisions 0 and 1

.

-2-

.- . - . _ . . -

t

.

'

.

'

- SU.ACP.10 Guidelines for Walkdown of Equipment or System,. Revisions 0.and SU.ACP.11 Processing'and Review of Design Document

- Change Forms, Revision 1 j SU.ACP.12 Processing of Nonconformance Reports, Revision 2- >

' SU.ACP.13 . Processing of Engineering Change Request Forms, Revisions 1 and 2 SU.ACP.14 Approval of Preoperational Test Results, Revision 0 SU.ACP.15 Tagging of Systems Turned over for Preoperational Testing, Revision 0 SU.PRP.014 System Release and Turnover, Revisions 0 and 1 Among the areas which will require clarification.in either the FSAR, Preoperational and Startup Testing Manual, or the implementing procedures are: , The function of.the different organizations or' groups-in the review and approval chain of preoperational test procedures and result The licensee plans to ammend-the FSAR'to agree.with their. Testing Manua The complete installation of seismic restraints prior to preoperational testing of equipment. The licensee plans to ammend the FSAR and will require completion prior to fuel loadin , The development of criteria for the restart of an interrupted test. The licensee will add these criteria to ACP # : Ensuring'that identified deficiencies are reviewed.for required retesting and that the review is documente '

The licensee willEadd this requirement to ACP # ; Ensuring that preoperational test procedures reflect the ,

latest drawings prior to their use. The licensee will-add this requirement to ACP'# The requirement that proposed design changes be reviewed for conformance with the FSAR, codes, and standards; and

.

.

t-3- ,

t Y

,

I

, , , . ,e-- , e- w e,- m,r..- 4 ,, , , , .r rm - * -

w= ,rw m'we.--- , - - - ' - ~ ~ ~ ve-.- + + .--+

!

. 1

.

$

-

t that revisions to the FSAR,

~

I if required by proposed ,

design changes, are submitted to the NRC promptly. The-licensee.will include this requirement in procedure 03-QAS-03.-

' The identification of retesting required by design changes, to systems or components once the system has been turned over for preoperational testin The' licensee will includ '

this in procedure 03-QAS-0 r .The development of. procedures-to cover equipment protection and cleanliness.as plant areas or systems are turned'over-from construction to EPD. The licensee noted they. vill be develope The development of procedures to cover maintenance of equip-ment turned over for operation. The licensee stated they were being generate ~ The inclusion of control room equipment in the green taggin of equipment turned over for preoperational testing. The-licensee will include' control room equipment in ACP #1 During the review of SU.ACP.07 the qualifications of instrument and control technicians were discussed in detail. The licensee is not commited to meet ANSI N18.1-1971 prior to the isonance  !

'

of the license. At the present time four individuals meet the-ANSI requirements while five lack the required two years of experienceL(range between 12 to 18 months). This item was *

resolved during a telephone conversation on August 17, 1978 (refer to paragraph 4).

The licensee stated he will not turnover any system for4 pre- *

. operational testing until the.above areas are resolve No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie ' Plant Familiarization The inspector started his familiarization with plant system and layout on August 9 and 10, 197 . Exit Interview 1

-)

The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in l paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on August 11,.  ;

1978. The inspector summarized the, scope and findings of the j inspectio . , , .- - , . . ~ , . .

.

. ~

!

In response to an inspector's concern regarding instrument [

technicians qualifications during preoperational testing the licensee commited, during a phone conversation with the Station Superintendent on August 17, 1978, to perform all neutron monitoring equipment calibrations and tests with personnel who have either, performed that type of work before at other sites, or , been trained to perform that type of work and who will be under the direct supervision of personnel who have done that type of work befor ,

I

+

l

,

i n

G I-5-

..