ML20055A490

Notice of Violation from Insp on 820302-0407

ML20055A490
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	07/01/1982
From:	Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20055A488	List: IR 05000358/1982005 ML20055A487 ML20055A490
References
50-358-82-05, 50-358-82-5, NUDOCS 8207190070
Download: ML20055A490 (2)

Text

.

1 s q ., ,

Appendix e s 9-

,1[- NOTICE OF VIOLATION t

T / Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company Docket No. 50-358 As a result of tho inspection conducted during the period of March 2-5, 8-12, i 15-19 22-26, 29-31, April 1-2, and 5-7, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC -

l Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982), the following violations were l identified:

1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V states, in part, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, pro-

'. j cedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to'the circumstances and

shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, e or drawings." '

i

. The Cincinnati Cas and Electric Company Quality Assurance Manual, Paragraph 5.1 states, " Construction, fabrication, and manufacturing activities which affect the quality of the facility are accomplished in accordance with written instructions, procedures, and drawings which prescribe acceptable methods of carrying out those activities."

s- Contrary to the above, CG6E Quality Assurance Procedure 16-QA-03,

" Corrective Action Reports," was not appropriate to the circumstances and did not prescribe acceptable methods of achieving corrective action to identified problems as evidenced by lack of timely corrective action and lack of procedure adherence on the part of those administering the procedure. This condition existed from the time Revision 2 to 16-QA-03 was issued (August 28, 1981) until the corrective actions detailed in Inspection Report No. 50-358/82-05 were instituted by the licensee.

This is a Severity Level,V violation (Supplement II).

l 2. 10 CFR'50, Appendix B, Criterion V states, in part, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, pro-cedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and s shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."

The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company Quality Assurance Manta:

Paragraph 5.1 states, " Construction, fabrication, and manufactur og D, activities which affect the quality of the facility are accomplished s in accordance with written instructions, procedures, and drawings

?,

which prescribe acceptable methods of carrying out those activities."

,( '

q y

li J

/ 8207190070 820701 PDR ADOCK 05000358 o PDR

'. {} s ' ')

f u w

i Appendix 2 Contrary to the above, the personnel responsible for administering the Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company Owners Project Procedure (OPP)-7.1, "NRC 10 CFR 21 and 50.55(e) Reports," failed to follow the procedure in that the results of prompt reviews for reportability were not documented, ,

the forms (Attachment 7.3 to OPP-7.1) were not properly filled out, and

~

l the log of activities under OPP-7.1 was not maintained as described on the procedure flow chart (Attachment 7.5 to PP-7.1). This failure to l follow procedure resulted in the lack of documentary evidence of

• activities affecting quality, as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII (records of reviews), and could potentially have l resulted in the failure to report under 10 CFR 21 or 10 CFR 50.55(e).

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement,II).

With respect to Item 1, the inspection showed that action had been taken to correct the identified items of noncompliance and to prevent recdrrence.

Consequently, no reply to this item of noncompliance is required and we have i no further questions regarding this matter. With respect to Item 2, pursuant j to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explana-tion in reply, including for each item of noncompliance: (1) corrective 4

action taken and results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be l achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

QUb _

! Dated R. L. Spessard, Director l

Division of Project and Resident Programs t

i

- __ _ _ __ _-.