ML20198C204

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:06, 22 November 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Order Instructing Case to File Single Response to Applicant Petition for Directed Certification of ASLB 851031 Order. Response Should Be Divided Into Two Parts,Main Docket Issues & Docket 2 Issues.Served on 851108
ML20198C204
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 11/07/1985
From: Shoemaker C
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:
Citizens Association for Sound Energy
References
CON-#485-119 OL, OL-2, NUDOCS 8511120017
Download: ML20198C204 (1)


Text

. . . . - - . _ - .-

C -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA /

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION' .-

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL B,OARD Administrative Judges: \\ 1[

, l Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman November-J',.1985'

'~~

Dr. W. Reed Johnson Thomas S. Moore

' p.31>

)

In the Matter of )

)

TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC ) Docket Nos. 50-445 OL & OL-2 COMPANY, et _al.

) 50-446 OL & OL-2 (Comanche Peak Steam Electric )

Station, Units 1 and 2) )

)

ORDER Intervenor Citizens Association for Sound Energy (CASE) shall file a single response to the applicants' petition for directed certification of the Licensing Board's October 31, 1985 order. That response may be divided into two parts; one of them devoted to the considerations pertaining to the issues in the so-called " Main Docket" and the other devoted to the considerations pertaining to the issues in " Docket 2." If that approach is adopted, CASE's counsel and representative should assure that redundancy is avoided.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD

b. --

C. @jan Eloemaker Secretary to the Appeal Board 85111200U i

-