|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217D7961999-10-12012 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Removing Turbine EHC Low Oil Pressure Trip from RPS Trip Function Requirements in TS Sections 2.2 & 3/4.1.A ML20210R8281999-08-13013 August 1999 Revised Bases Page B.3/4.9-6 to TS Section 3/4.9,providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description in UFSAR Sections 8.3.2.1 & 8.3.2.2 ML20209J2321999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.D Replacing Limit for Any One Msli Valve of Less than or Equal 11.5 Sfch with Aggregate Value of Less than or Equal 46 Scfh for All MSIVs ML20209C2951999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.C, Reactivity Control - Control Rod Operability ML20205L2631999-04-0505 April 1999 Tech Spec Page B 3/4.5-2 to TS Section 3/4.5, ECCS, to Clarify Requirement Discussed in ML20205J9321999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.E Changing SRs 4.6.E.2 to Allow one-time Extension of 18 Month Requirement to Pressure Test or Replace One Half of MSSVs to Interval of 24 Months ML20205J9911999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Alternative Methodology for Quantifying RCS Leakage When Normal RCS Leakage Detection Sys Is Inoperable ML20205J9741999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Various License Conditions That Have Been Completed,Making Editorial Changes & Providing Clarifying Info ML20199L7741999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases for Sections 3/4.10.K & 3/4.10.L, Provides Description of Design & Operation of RHR SD Cooling Subsystem ML20199L6921999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.6.I,relocating from Chemistry TS Requirements to UFSAR ML20196H4571998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.J, Safe Shutdown Makeup Pump, Reducing Current AOT from 67 Days to 14 Days ML20196F6451998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1.A,3/4.10.B & 3/4.12.B,proposing Changes to Relocate Requirement to Remove RPS Shorting Links Which Enable non-coincident Scram for Neutron Instrumentation,To Licensee Controlled Document ML20155D8091998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Sections 3/4.2.D & 3/4.5.D, Providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description Contained in UFSAR Section 5.4.6.2 ML20151S7991998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Max Allowable MSIV Leakage from 11.5 Scfh to 30 Scfh Per Valve When Tested at 25 Psig, IAW SR 4.7.D.6 ML20236W8401998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases 3/4.7.C & 3/4.7.12.C,clarifying Testing Requirements for Primary Containment Excess Flow Check Valves ML20247D7761998-05-0505 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page B 3/4.4-1,changing Administrative Error.Bases for Net Quantity of Gallons for Solution Is Changed from 3254 (Correct Quantity) to 3245 ML20246Q3481998-04-29029 April 1998 TS Page B 3/4.5-3,reflecting Change to TS Bases for Section 3/4.5.C ML20217G1481998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section 3/4.5.A,reflecting Design Info Contained in Rev 4 to Ufsar,Dtd Apr 1997 ML20216C6381997-08-29029 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating New Siemens' Methodologies That Will Enhance Operational Flexibility & Reducing Likelihood of Future Plant Derates ML20196G0271997-05-0101 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.b Revising Load Value for Diesel Generator to Be Equal to or Greater than Largest Single Load & Revising Frequency & Voltage Requirements During Performance of Test ML20138G3321997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Permitting Loading of ATRIUM-9B Fuel in Plant Unit Core for Operational Modes 3,4 & 5.Modes Will Support Refueling Activities Such as Fuel Load,Vessel re- Assembly & Single Rod Timing ML20138B3231997-04-21021 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting That NRC Grant Exigent Amend to TS 2.1.B & 6.9.A.6.b to Support Plant Unit 2 Cycle 15 Operation Scheduled to Begin 970519 ML20137G3981997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.P Re Standby Gas Treatment & TS 5.2.C Re Secondary Containment ML20135F7321997-03-0303 March 1997 Proposed Tech Spec Bases 3/4.9.E,clarifying Purpose of SR 4.9.E ML20135D9461997-02-24024 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Bases for TS Surveillance 4.8.D.5.c ML20138L4011997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.B Re Thermal Power,Section 3/4.11 Re Power Distribution Limits,Section 3/4.6 Re Primary Sys Boundary,Section 5.3 Re Reactor Core & Section 6.9 Re Reporting Requirements ML20138L3701997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.h Re Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Requirements ML20134D2191997-01-27027 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting marked-up Sentence from TS Bases for Section 3/4.7.K ML20129C2391996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs for Dresden 2 & 3 & Quad Cities 1 & 2, marked-up to Show Transition Verbiage ML20129D3981996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.K,updating Pressure-Temp Curves to 22 Effective Full Power Yrs & TS Bases ML20113C3571996-06-25025 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Upgrade Program ML20113A7861996-06-10010 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,App A,To Reflect Transition of Fuel Supplier from General Electric to Siemens Power Corp ML20117D7121996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing New LCO & SR Re Revs to TS for 10CFR50,App J,Lrt ML20107A1881996-04-0404 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4/4.4 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20101H1381996-03-25025 March 1996 Complete Version of TS Upgrade Program Pages That Reflect Current Configuration of Plant & Specifies SRs That Will Not Be Current Upon Implementation of Tsup Project ML20097D9231996-02-0808 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Upgrading Existing TS 3/4.5, Eccs ML20098A3821995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Upgrade Program & Improving Plant Submittals ML20086D4741995-06-30030 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program for Dresden Units 2 & 3 & Quad Cities Units 1 & 2 ML20087H8651995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program Section 3/4.10 ML20082H7481995-04-10010 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR for HPCI & RCIC Sys ML20080K8171995-02-23023 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Name of Iige to Reflect Results of Merger Between Iige,Mid American Energy Co,Midwest Power Sys Inc & Midwest Resources Inc ML20078E2051995-01-20020 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Snubber Visual Insp Intervals ML20078Q6061994-12-12012 December 1994 Proposed TS Section 3.4/4.4 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20064J3181994-03-11011 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Snubber Visual Insp Intervals ML20059A7321993-12-20020 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 1.1/2.1-1 Increasing MCPR Safety Limit from 1.06 to 1.07 for Units 1 & 2 ML20059A8301993-10-21021 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Requirements for Demonstrating Operability of Redundant Equipment When ECCS Equipment Is Found Inoperable or Made Inoperable for Maint ML20125D6381992-12-0808 December 1992 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1 Re Reactor Protection Sys ML20116J7091992-11-0606 November 1992 Corrected Proposed TS 3.2/4.2-8 Re Administrative Changes ML20106A6221992-09-15015 September 1992 Proposed TS 2.0, Safety Limits & Limiting Safety Sys Settings & 3/4.11, Power Distribution Limits ML20099D7791992-07-29029 July 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 1.0, Definitions, 3/4.0, Applicability & 3/4.3, Reactivity 1999-08-13
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217D7961999-10-12012 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Removing Turbine EHC Low Oil Pressure Trip from RPS Trip Function Requirements in TS Sections 2.2 & 3/4.1.A ML20210R8281999-08-13013 August 1999 Revised Bases Page B.3/4.9-6 to TS Section 3/4.9,providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description in UFSAR Sections 8.3.2.1 & 8.3.2.2 ML20209J2321999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.D Replacing Limit for Any One Msli Valve of Less than or Equal 11.5 Sfch with Aggregate Value of Less than or Equal 46 Scfh for All MSIVs ML20196K1941999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 2.0 to Chapter 11 of Quad Cities Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML20209C2951999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.C, Reactivity Control - Control Rod Operability ML20211C3311999-04-30030 April 1999 Rev 2.0 to Generic ODCM for Dresden,Quad Cities,Zion, Lasalle,Byron & Braidwood ML20205L2631999-04-0505 April 1999 Tech Spec Page B 3/4.5-2 to TS Section 3/4.5, ECCS, to Clarify Requirement Discussed in ML20205J9741999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Various License Conditions That Have Been Completed,Making Editorial Changes & Providing Clarifying Info ML20205J9321999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.E Changing SRs 4.6.E.2 to Allow one-time Extension of 18 Month Requirement to Pressure Test or Replace One Half of MSSVs to Interval of 24 Months ML20205J9911999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Alternative Methodology for Quantifying RCS Leakage When Normal RCS Leakage Detection Sys Is Inoperable ML20199L6921999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.6.I,relocating from Chemistry TS Requirements to UFSAR ML20199L7741999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases for Sections 3/4.10.K & 3/4.10.L, Provides Description of Design & Operation of RHR SD Cooling Subsystem ML20196H4571998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.J, Safe Shutdown Makeup Pump, Reducing Current AOT from 67 Days to 14 Days ML20196F6451998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1.A,3/4.10.B & 3/4.12.B,proposing Changes to Relocate Requirement to Remove RPS Shorting Links Which Enable non-coincident Scram for Neutron Instrumentation,To Licensee Controlled Document ML20196K5861998-11-0505 November 1998 Rev 3 to Qcap 0280-01, Process Control Program for Processing of Radioactive Wet Wastes at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ML20155D8091998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Sections 3/4.2.D & 3/4.5.D, Providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description Contained in UFSAR Section 5.4.6.2 ML20195J9041998-09-24024 September 1998 Rev 0 to TR-VQ1500-02, Clean ECCS Suction Strainer Head Loss Test Rept ML20151S7991998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Max Allowable MSIV Leakage from 11.5 Scfh to 30 Scfh Per Valve When Tested at 25 Psig, IAW SR 4.7.D.6 ML20236W8401998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases 3/4.7.C & 3/4.7.12.C,clarifying Testing Requirements for Primary Containment Excess Flow Check Valves ML20247D7761998-05-0505 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page B 3/4.4-1,changing Administrative Error.Bases for Net Quantity of Gallons for Solution Is Changed from 3254 (Correct Quantity) to 3245 ML20246Q3481998-04-29029 April 1998 TS Page B 3/4.5-3,reflecting Change to TS Bases for Section 3/4.5.C ML20217G1481998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section 3/4.5.A,reflecting Design Info Contained in Rev 4 to Ufsar,Dtd Apr 1997 ML20216C6381997-08-29029 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating New Siemens' Methodologies That Will Enhance Operational Flexibility & Reducing Likelihood of Future Plant Derates ML20196G0271997-05-0101 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.b Revising Load Value for Diesel Generator to Be Equal to or Greater than Largest Single Load & Revising Frequency & Voltage Requirements During Performance of Test ML20138G3321997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Permitting Loading of ATRIUM-9B Fuel in Plant Unit Core for Operational Modes 3,4 & 5.Modes Will Support Refueling Activities Such as Fuel Load,Vessel re- Assembly & Single Rod Timing ML20138B3231997-04-21021 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting That NRC Grant Exigent Amend to TS 2.1.B & 6.9.A.6.b to Support Plant Unit 2 Cycle 15 Operation Scheduled to Begin 970519 ML20137G3981997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.P Re Standby Gas Treatment & TS 5.2.C Re Secondary Containment ML20135F7321997-03-0303 March 1997 Proposed Tech Spec Bases 3/4.9.E,clarifying Purpose of SR 4.9.E ML20135D9461997-02-24024 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Bases for TS Surveillance 4.8.D.5.c ML20138L4011997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.B Re Thermal Power,Section 3/4.11 Re Power Distribution Limits,Section 3/4.6 Re Primary Sys Boundary,Section 5.3 Re Reactor Core & Section 6.9 Re Reporting Requirements ML20138L3701997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.h Re Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Requirements ML20134D2191997-01-27027 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting marked-up Sentence from TS Bases for Section 3/4.7.K ML20129K3321996-10-18018 October 1996 Cycle 15 Startup Test Results ML20129C2391996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs for Dresden 2 & 3 & Quad Cities 1 & 2, marked-up to Show Transition Verbiage ML20129D3981996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.K,updating Pressure-Temp Curves to 22 Effective Full Power Yrs & TS Bases ML20216H8841996-06-30030 June 1996 Revs to ODCM for Quad Cities,Including Rev 1.8 to Chapters 10,11,12 & App F ML20116F3971996-06-30030 June 1996 Rev 1.8 to ODCM, Annex,Chapters 10,11,12 & App F ML20113C3571996-06-25025 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Upgrade Program ML20113A7861996-06-10010 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,App A,To Reflect Transition of Fuel Supplier from General Electric to Siemens Power Corp ML20117D7121996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing New LCO & SR Re Revs to TS for 10CFR50,App J,Lrt ML20107A1881996-04-0404 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4/4.4 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20101H1381996-03-25025 March 1996 Complete Version of TS Upgrade Program Pages That Reflect Current Configuration of Plant & Specifies SRs That Will Not Be Current Upon Implementation of Tsup Project ML20097D9231996-02-0808 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Upgrading Existing TS 3/4.5, Eccs ML20100C0441996-01-24024 January 1996 Secondary Containment Leak Test Summary ML20093K7721995-10-12012 October 1995 Quad-Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 Cycle 14 Startup Test Results Summary ML20098A3821995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Upgrade Program & Improving Plant Submittals ML20086D4741995-06-30030 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program for Dresden Units 2 & 3 & Quad Cities Units 1 & 2 ML20087H8651995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program Section 3/4.10 ML20082H7481995-04-10010 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR for HPCI & RCIC Sys ML20080K8171995-02-23023 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Name of Iige to Reflect Results of Merger Between Iige,Mid American Energy Co,Midwest Power Sys Inc & Midwest Resources Inc 1999-08-13
[Table view] |
Text
.
ATTACllMENT B MARKED-UP PAGE FOR PROPOSED CIIANGE SVP-98-291 (Page 1 of 2)
REVISED PAGE Page Change
- 1. Page 3/4.7-7 93o9090051 900031 4 DR ADOCK 05
- i CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS PCIVs 3/4.7.D l
.~
3.7 - LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 4.7 - SURVElLLANCE REQUIREMENTS !
- 2. With one or more reactor a. At least once per 31 days by 4 .
instrumentation line excess flow check verifying the continuity of the i'_ valves inoperable, operation may 3 explosive charge.
'. continua and the provisions of {
a Specification 3.0.C are not applicable, b. At least once per 18 months by provided that within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> either: removing at least one explosive
' squib from an explosive valve such
- a. The inoperable valve is restored to that each explosive squib will be OPERABLE status, or tested at least once per 90 months, and initiating the removed
- b. The instrument line is isolated and explosive squib (s). The the associated instrument is replacement charge for the declared . inoperable. explcded squib (s) shall be from the same manufactured ba'tch as the
- Otherwise, be in at least HOT one fired or from another batch SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> which has been certified by having and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the at least one of that batch following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. successfully fired. No squib shall
- remain in use beyond the expiration of its shelf-life or operating life, as
, applicable, i
- 6. At the frequency specified by the Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, verify leakage for any one main steam line isolation valve when tested at P,(25 psig) is s; .
. scfh.
so*
4 J
i:
L 1
! i l
i l
I
)
I QUAD CITnES - UNITS 1 & 2
- 3/4.7-7 Amendment Nos. 171 a ur i
1
.- l
.- j l
i ATTACIIMENT C ;
EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANT IIA 7sARDS CONSIDERATIONS l AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICABILITY REVIEW 1
SVP-98-291 l (Page 1 of 4) l l
Comed has evaluated this proposed amendment for Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 '
and determined that it involves no significant hazards consideration. According to 10 CFR 50.92(c), a proposed amendment to an operadng license involves no significant hazards consideration if operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not:
1 1
Invo!ve a significant increase in the probability of occurrence or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; ,
l Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident i previously evaluated; or l Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Comed proposes to amend Appendix A, Technical Specifications, of Facility Operating l Licenses DPR-29 and DPR-30. The proposed amendment request increases the maximum allowable MSIV leakage rate specified in Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement 4.7.D.6, for a single valve, from 11.5 scfh to 30 scfh. The benefits realized from this proposed change are significant. A greater allowable MSIV leak rate will reduce the amount of unplanned MSIV maintenance, improving outage performance and reducing radiation exposure for plant personnel.
The proposed increase in the maximum allowable MSIV leakage rate is supported by a revision to the Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 control room radiological assessment.
The revised radiological assessment was submitted to the NRC on May 19,1997,and includes significant enhancements such as credit for suppression pool scrubbing, updated ,
iodine dose conversion factors, and allowance for higher burnup fuel designs. The report also clearly defines the design inputs, methodologies and assumptions used in calculating the control room and ofTsite dose levels following a postulated design basis accident.
The determination that the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50.92 are met for this amendment request is indicated below:
\
i ATTACIIMENT C .
EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANT IIAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS !
i AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICABILITY i REVIEW I SVP-98-291 l
(Page 2 of 4) i Does the change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of !
an accident previously evaluated?
i The proposed change to Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement 4.7.D.6 increases the maximum allowable leakage rate for a single Main Steam isolation <
Valve (MSIV) from 11.5 scfh to 30 scfh. This change has no impact on the l automatic or manual closure features of the valve including automatic actuations and response times. Closme of the MSIVs is a postulated transient considered in the design basis of the plant. Since the proposed change does not impact the response characteristics of the MSIVs during a postulated transient condition, the change does not impact the probability of an accident previously evaluated.
I The change in allowable MSIV leakage has been evaluated to assess the impact on control room operator dose and offsite dose levels. The radiological assessment was performed with an updated radiological methodology that included significant l enhancements, such as credit for suppression pool scrubbing, updated iodine dose l conversion factors, and allowance for higher burnup fuel designs. Using this revised methodology, which is consistent with current regulatory requirements, the resulting dose levels from a postulated design basis accident continue to remain below the limits established in 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria 19 (GDC-19) l and 10 CFR 100. Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant I increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated j Therefore this proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
Does the change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from !
any accident previously evaluated?
The safety function of the MSIVs is to provide a timely steam line isolation to mitigate the release of radioactive steam and limit reactor inventory loss under certain accident and transient conditions. The MSIVs are designed to automatically close whenever plaat conditions warrant a main steam line isolation. The proposed increase in allowable MSIV leakage does not impact the MSIV's ability to perform its underlying safety function, nor does the change involve any physical features of the valves and associated steam lines to create a new or different type of accident.
I ATTACIIMENT C l
r EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANT IIAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS i
AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICABILITY REVIEW SVP-98-291 (Page 3 of 4)
Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
Does the change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
The proposed increase in allowable MSIV leakage represents a nominal increase in the release of radioactivity during a design basis event. The radiological assessment l
was performed with an updated radiological methodology that included significant enhancements, such as credit for suppression pool scrubbing, updated iodine dose conversion factois, and allowance for higher burnup fuel designs. Using this revised methodology, which is consistent with current regulatory requirements, the resulting dose levels from a postulated design basis accident cor.tinue to remain below the limits established in 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC-19 and 10 CFR 100.
l Therefore, these changes do not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety.
Therefore, based upon the above evaluation, Comed has concluded that these changes l involve no significant hazards consideration.
l e
I 1 l l
? l l
l l
l
ATTACIINIENT C EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANT IIAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS AND ENVIRONNIENTAL ASSESShlENT APPLICABILITY '
REVIEW SVP-98-291 (Page 4 of 4)
Comed has evaluated this proposed operating license amendment request against the criteria for identification oflicensing and regulatory actions requiring environmental assessment in accordance with 10 CFR 51.21 Comed has determined that this proposed license amendment request meets the criteria for a catego-ical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9) and as such, has determined that no irreversible consequences exist in accordance with 10 CFR 50.92(b). This detecmination is based on the fact that this change is being proposed as an amendment to a license issued pursuant to 10 CFR 50 that changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR 20, or that changes an inspection or a surveillance requirement, and the amendment meets the following specific criteria:
(i) the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.
As demonstrated in Attachment C, this proposed amendment does not involve any significant hazards consideration.
(ii) there is no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any eflluent that may be released offsite.
As documented in Attachment C, there will be no change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any eflluents released ofTsite. Both control room operator and offsite dose levels remain within the regulatory requirements.
j (iii) there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation j exposure.
l l The proposed changes will not result in changes in the operation or configuration l of the facility. There will be no change in the level of controls or methodology
- used for processing of radioactive efiluents or handling of solid radioactive waste, nor will the proposal result in any change in the normal radiation levels within the plant. Therefore, there will be no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure resulting from this change. Exposure is expected to decrease based on the projected decrease in MSIV maintenance.
4 i