|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217D7961999-10-12012 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Removing Turbine EHC Low Oil Pressure Trip from RPS Trip Function Requirements in TS Sections 2.2 & 3/4.1.A ML20210R8281999-08-13013 August 1999 Revised Bases Page B.3/4.9-6 to TS Section 3/4.9,providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description in UFSAR Sections 8.3.2.1 & 8.3.2.2 ML20209J2321999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.D Replacing Limit for Any One Msli Valve of Less than or Equal 11.5 Sfch with Aggregate Value of Less than or Equal 46 Scfh for All MSIVs ML20209C2951999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.C, Reactivity Control - Control Rod Operability ML20205L2631999-04-0505 April 1999 Tech Spec Page B 3/4.5-2 to TS Section 3/4.5, ECCS, to Clarify Requirement Discussed in ML20205J9321999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.E Changing SRs 4.6.E.2 to Allow one-time Extension of 18 Month Requirement to Pressure Test or Replace One Half of MSSVs to Interval of 24 Months ML20205J9911999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Alternative Methodology for Quantifying RCS Leakage When Normal RCS Leakage Detection Sys Is Inoperable ML20205J9741999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Various License Conditions That Have Been Completed,Making Editorial Changes & Providing Clarifying Info ML20199L7741999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases for Sections 3/4.10.K & 3/4.10.L, Provides Description of Design & Operation of RHR SD Cooling Subsystem ML20199L6921999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.6.I,relocating from Chemistry TS Requirements to UFSAR ML20196H4571998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.J, Safe Shutdown Makeup Pump, Reducing Current AOT from 67 Days to 14 Days ML20196F6451998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1.A,3/4.10.B & 3/4.12.B,proposing Changes to Relocate Requirement to Remove RPS Shorting Links Which Enable non-coincident Scram for Neutron Instrumentation,To Licensee Controlled Document ML20155D8091998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Sections 3/4.2.D & 3/4.5.D, Providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description Contained in UFSAR Section 5.4.6.2 ML20151S7991998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Max Allowable MSIV Leakage from 11.5 Scfh to 30 Scfh Per Valve When Tested at 25 Psig, IAW SR 4.7.D.6 ML20236W8401998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases 3/4.7.C & 3/4.7.12.C,clarifying Testing Requirements for Primary Containment Excess Flow Check Valves ML20247D7761998-05-0505 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page B 3/4.4-1,changing Administrative Error.Bases for Net Quantity of Gallons for Solution Is Changed from 3254 (Correct Quantity) to 3245 ML20246Q3481998-04-29029 April 1998 TS Page B 3/4.5-3,reflecting Change to TS Bases for Section 3/4.5.C ML20217G1481998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section 3/4.5.A,reflecting Design Info Contained in Rev 4 to Ufsar,Dtd Apr 1997 ML20216C6381997-08-29029 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating New Siemens' Methodologies That Will Enhance Operational Flexibility & Reducing Likelihood of Future Plant Derates ML20196G0271997-05-0101 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.b Revising Load Value for Diesel Generator to Be Equal to or Greater than Largest Single Load & Revising Frequency & Voltage Requirements During Performance of Test ML20138G3321997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Permitting Loading of ATRIUM-9B Fuel in Plant Unit Core for Operational Modes 3,4 & 5.Modes Will Support Refueling Activities Such as Fuel Load,Vessel re- Assembly & Single Rod Timing ML20138B3231997-04-21021 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting That NRC Grant Exigent Amend to TS 2.1.B & 6.9.A.6.b to Support Plant Unit 2 Cycle 15 Operation Scheduled to Begin 970519 ML20137G3981997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.P Re Standby Gas Treatment & TS 5.2.C Re Secondary Containment ML20135F7321997-03-0303 March 1997 Proposed Tech Spec Bases 3/4.9.E,clarifying Purpose of SR 4.9.E ML20135D9461997-02-24024 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Bases for TS Surveillance 4.8.D.5.c ML20138L4011997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.B Re Thermal Power,Section 3/4.11 Re Power Distribution Limits,Section 3/4.6 Re Primary Sys Boundary,Section 5.3 Re Reactor Core & Section 6.9 Re Reporting Requirements ML20138L3701997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.h Re Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Requirements ML20134D2191997-01-27027 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting marked-up Sentence from TS Bases for Section 3/4.7.K ML20129C2391996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs for Dresden 2 & 3 & Quad Cities 1 & 2, marked-up to Show Transition Verbiage ML20129D3981996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.K,updating Pressure-Temp Curves to 22 Effective Full Power Yrs & TS Bases ML20113C3571996-06-25025 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Upgrade Program ML20113A7861996-06-10010 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,App A,To Reflect Transition of Fuel Supplier from General Electric to Siemens Power Corp ML20117D7121996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing New LCO & SR Re Revs to TS for 10CFR50,App J,Lrt ML20107A1881996-04-0404 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4/4.4 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20101H1381996-03-25025 March 1996 Complete Version of TS Upgrade Program Pages That Reflect Current Configuration of Plant & Specifies SRs That Will Not Be Current Upon Implementation of Tsup Project ML20097D9231996-02-0808 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Upgrading Existing TS 3/4.5, Eccs ML20098A3821995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Upgrade Program & Improving Plant Submittals ML20086D4741995-06-30030 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program for Dresden Units 2 & 3 & Quad Cities Units 1 & 2 ML20087H8651995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program Section 3/4.10 ML20082H7481995-04-10010 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR for HPCI & RCIC Sys ML20080K8171995-02-23023 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Name of Iige to Reflect Results of Merger Between Iige,Mid American Energy Co,Midwest Power Sys Inc & Midwest Resources Inc ML20078E2051995-01-20020 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Snubber Visual Insp Intervals ML20078Q6061994-12-12012 December 1994 Proposed TS Section 3.4/4.4 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20064J3181994-03-11011 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Snubber Visual Insp Intervals ML20059A7321993-12-20020 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 1.1/2.1-1 Increasing MCPR Safety Limit from 1.06 to 1.07 for Units 1 & 2 ML20059A8301993-10-21021 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Requirements for Demonstrating Operability of Redundant Equipment When ECCS Equipment Is Found Inoperable or Made Inoperable for Maint ML20125D6381992-12-0808 December 1992 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1 Re Reactor Protection Sys ML20116J7091992-11-0606 November 1992 Corrected Proposed TS 3.2/4.2-8 Re Administrative Changes ML20106A6221992-09-15015 September 1992 Proposed TS 2.0, Safety Limits & Limiting Safety Sys Settings & 3/4.11, Power Distribution Limits ML20099D7791992-07-29029 July 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 1.0, Definitions, 3/4.0, Applicability & 3/4.3, Reactivity 1999-08-13
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217D7961999-10-12012 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Removing Turbine EHC Low Oil Pressure Trip from RPS Trip Function Requirements in TS Sections 2.2 & 3/4.1.A ML20210R8281999-08-13013 August 1999 Revised Bases Page B.3/4.9-6 to TS Section 3/4.9,providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description in UFSAR Sections 8.3.2.1 & 8.3.2.2 ML20209J2321999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.D Replacing Limit for Any One Msli Valve of Less than or Equal 11.5 Sfch with Aggregate Value of Less than or Equal 46 Scfh for All MSIVs ML20196K1941999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 2.0 to Chapter 11 of Quad Cities Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML20209C2951999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.C, Reactivity Control - Control Rod Operability ML20211C3311999-04-30030 April 1999 Rev 2.0 to Generic ODCM for Dresden,Quad Cities,Zion, Lasalle,Byron & Braidwood ML20205L2631999-04-0505 April 1999 Tech Spec Page B 3/4.5-2 to TS Section 3/4.5, ECCS, to Clarify Requirement Discussed in ML20205J9741999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Various License Conditions That Have Been Completed,Making Editorial Changes & Providing Clarifying Info ML20205J9321999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.E Changing SRs 4.6.E.2 to Allow one-time Extension of 18 Month Requirement to Pressure Test or Replace One Half of MSSVs to Interval of 24 Months ML20205J9911999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Alternative Methodology for Quantifying RCS Leakage When Normal RCS Leakage Detection Sys Is Inoperable ML20199L6921999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.6.I,relocating from Chemistry TS Requirements to UFSAR ML20199L7741999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases for Sections 3/4.10.K & 3/4.10.L, Provides Description of Design & Operation of RHR SD Cooling Subsystem ML20196H4571998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.J, Safe Shutdown Makeup Pump, Reducing Current AOT from 67 Days to 14 Days ML20196F6451998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1.A,3/4.10.B & 3/4.12.B,proposing Changes to Relocate Requirement to Remove RPS Shorting Links Which Enable non-coincident Scram for Neutron Instrumentation,To Licensee Controlled Document ML20196K5861998-11-0505 November 1998 Rev 3 to Qcap 0280-01, Process Control Program for Processing of Radioactive Wet Wastes at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ML20155D8091998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Sections 3/4.2.D & 3/4.5.D, Providing Clarity & Consistency with Sys Design Description Contained in UFSAR Section 5.4.6.2 ML20195J9041998-09-24024 September 1998 Rev 0 to TR-VQ1500-02, Clean ECCS Suction Strainer Head Loss Test Rept ML20151S7991998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Max Allowable MSIV Leakage from 11.5 Scfh to 30 Scfh Per Valve When Tested at 25 Psig, IAW SR 4.7.D.6 ML20236W8401998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases 3/4.7.C & 3/4.7.12.C,clarifying Testing Requirements for Primary Containment Excess Flow Check Valves ML20247D7761998-05-0505 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page B 3/4.4-1,changing Administrative Error.Bases for Net Quantity of Gallons for Solution Is Changed from 3254 (Correct Quantity) to 3245 ML20246Q3481998-04-29029 April 1998 TS Page B 3/4.5-3,reflecting Change to TS Bases for Section 3/4.5.C ML20217G1481998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section 3/4.5.A,reflecting Design Info Contained in Rev 4 to Ufsar,Dtd Apr 1997 ML20216C6381997-08-29029 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating New Siemens' Methodologies That Will Enhance Operational Flexibility & Reducing Likelihood of Future Plant Derates ML20196G0271997-05-0101 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.b Revising Load Value for Diesel Generator to Be Equal to or Greater than Largest Single Load & Revising Frequency & Voltage Requirements During Performance of Test ML20138G3321997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Permitting Loading of ATRIUM-9B Fuel in Plant Unit Core for Operational Modes 3,4 & 5.Modes Will Support Refueling Activities Such as Fuel Load,Vessel re- Assembly & Single Rod Timing ML20138B3231997-04-21021 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting That NRC Grant Exigent Amend to TS 2.1.B & 6.9.A.6.b to Support Plant Unit 2 Cycle 15 Operation Scheduled to Begin 970519 ML20137G3981997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.P Re Standby Gas Treatment & TS 5.2.C Re Secondary Containment ML20135F7321997-03-0303 March 1997 Proposed Tech Spec Bases 3/4.9.E,clarifying Purpose of SR 4.9.E ML20135D9461997-02-24024 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Bases for TS Surveillance 4.8.D.5.c ML20138L4011997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.B Re Thermal Power,Section 3/4.11 Re Power Distribution Limits,Section 3/4.6 Re Primary Sys Boundary,Section 5.3 Re Reactor Core & Section 6.9 Re Reporting Requirements ML20138L3701997-02-17017 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 4.9.A.8.h Re Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Requirements ML20134D2191997-01-27027 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting marked-up Sentence from TS Bases for Section 3/4.7.K ML20129K3321996-10-18018 October 1996 Cycle 15 Startup Test Results ML20129C2391996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs for Dresden 2 & 3 & Quad Cities 1 & 2, marked-up to Show Transition Verbiage ML20129D3981996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.K,updating Pressure-Temp Curves to 22 Effective Full Power Yrs & TS Bases ML20216H8841996-06-30030 June 1996 Revs to ODCM for Quad Cities,Including Rev 1.8 to Chapters 10,11,12 & App F ML20116F3971996-06-30030 June 1996 Rev 1.8 to ODCM, Annex,Chapters 10,11,12 & App F ML20113C3571996-06-25025 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Upgrade Program ML20113A7861996-06-10010 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,App A,To Reflect Transition of Fuel Supplier from General Electric to Siemens Power Corp ML20117D7121996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing New LCO & SR Re Revs to TS for 10CFR50,App J,Lrt ML20107A1881996-04-0404 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4/4.4 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20101H1381996-03-25025 March 1996 Complete Version of TS Upgrade Program Pages That Reflect Current Configuration of Plant & Specifies SRs That Will Not Be Current Upon Implementation of Tsup Project ML20097D9231996-02-0808 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Upgrading Existing TS 3/4.5, Eccs ML20100C0441996-01-24024 January 1996 Secondary Containment Leak Test Summary ML20093K7721995-10-12012 October 1995 Quad-Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 Cycle 14 Startup Test Results Summary ML20098A3821995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Upgrade Program & Improving Plant Submittals ML20086D4741995-06-30030 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program for Dresden Units 2 & 3 & Quad Cities Units 1 & 2 ML20087H8651995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re TS Upgrade Program Section 3/4.10 ML20082H7481995-04-10010 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR for HPCI & RCIC Sys ML20080K8171995-02-23023 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Name of Iige to Reflect Results of Merger Between Iige,Mid American Energy Co,Midwest Power Sys Inc & Midwest Resources Inc 1999-08-13
[Table view] |
Text
,
i PRIMARY SYSTEM BOUNDARY Safety Valves 3/4.6.E 3.6 - LIMI MG CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION
- 4.6 - SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS E. Safety Vi, *s E. Safety Valves The safety valve function of the 9 reactor 1. Deleted.
1 coolant system safety valves shall be 9 OPERABLE in accordance with the specified 2. At least once per 18[ months,1/2 of j i
code safety valve function lift settings
- the safety valves shall be removed, set established as: pressure tested and reinstalled or l
replaced with spares that have been i 1 safety valve" @1135 psig 1% previously set pressure tested and 2 safety valves @1240 psig 11% stored in accordance with 2 safety valves @1250 psig 11%
manufacturer's recommendations. At !
4 safety valves @1260 psig 1% least once per 40 months, the safety valves shall be rotated such that all 9 safety valves are removed, set APPLtCABlV3 pressure tested and reinstalled or reL ;ced with spares that have been OPERATIONAL MODEls) 1, 2 and 3. previously set pressure tested and stored in accordance with ACTION: manufacturer's recommendations.
",. With the safety valve function of one or more of the above required safety valves inoperable, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in I COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
- 2. Deleted.
l 1
T*ke S u ro *MIr ~a ode"s\ kss breu eshaded to 24 n As for 4ad I, escle if, malg . Tke gemsi.a s .i specda. N u 4.0.6 are a,ppta kle -
0 The lift setting pressure shall correspond to ambient conditions of the valves at nominal operating temperatures and pressures.
b Target Rock combination safety / relief valve.
C.
AD CITIES - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4.6-7 Amendment Nos. 171 s 167 9904120268 990330 PDR ADOCK 05000254 P PDR -
ATTACIIMENT C Information Supporting a Finding of No Significant Ilazards SVP-99 032 (Page 1 of 2)
The Commission has provided standards for determining whether a significant Hazards consideration exists as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c). A proposed amendment to an operating license involves a no significant hazards consideration if op ration of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not:
Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Comed proposes to amend Appendix A, Technical Specification SR 4.6.E of Facility Operating License DPR-29. The amendment request changes are consistent with the requirements of ASME Code Section XI,1989 edition, Subsection IWV 1000, w hich refers to ANSI /ASME OM (Part 10) which in turn refers to ANSI /ASME OM-1-1987; and NUREG 1482.
The determination that the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50.92 are met for this amendment request is indicated below:
Does the change involve a sig Micant increbe in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
The proposed changes request a one-time change to the surveillance requirement for the MSSVs and Target Rock. S/RV. The surveillance interval between MSSVs and Target Rock S/RV testing is not a precursor assumed in any previously analyzed accident.
Therefore, the probability of a previously evaluated accident has not been increased.
The proposed extension is consistent with the ASME Code requirement to test 20% of the sample population every 24 months with all of the valves in the sample group being tested every 60 months. The proposed changes are alsa consistent with NUREG 1433 Revision 1, and do not adversely affect existing plant safety margins or the reliability of the equipment assumed to operate in the safety analysis. Operating experience and excellent materiel condition of the MSSVs and Target Rock S/RV suppon the expectation that they will contmue to perform their iraended function. Therefore, the consequences of a previously evaluated accident have not been increased.
m
o 1 ATTACllMENT C Information Supporting a Finding of No Significant llazards SVP-99-032 (Page 2 of 2)
Does the change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
No new equipment is required, nor will the MSSVs and Target Rock S/RV be operated in a different manner during the period of the extended surveillance interval. The proposed changes are consistent with NUREG 1433 Revision 1, requirements for safety valve surveillance intervals as well as the ASME Code requirements for testing safety valves.
Operating experience and superior materiel condition of the MSSVs and Target Rock S/RV support the expectation that they vcill continue to perform their intended function.
Therefore, the possibility of a new or different accident has not been increased.
Does the change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
The proposed amendment repu.sents an extension to the current TS SRs that would otherwise be provided generically by the ASME Code. The proposed changes are also consistent with NUREG-1433, Revision 1, and do not adversely affect existing plant safety margins or the reliability of the equipment assumed to operate in the safety analysis. The proposed changes have been evaluated and found to be acceptable for use at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station based on system safety analysis requirements and operational performance. The MSSVs and Target Rock S/RV provisions continue to be adequately maintained during plant operation. The proposed changes to the MSSVs and Target Rock S/RV surveillance interval do not significantly reduce existing plant safety ;
margins since excellent materiel condition and acceptable surveillance test results support the expectation that no significant degradation will occur over the extended interval.
The proposed changes are based on NRC accepted provisions at otner operating plants that are applicable at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station and maintain necessary levels of system or component reliability.
l The proposed amendment for Qued Cities Nuclear Power Station will not reduce the l availability of systems required to mitigate accident conditior;.
Therefore, these changes do not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety.
Therefore, based upon the above evaluation, Comed has concluded that these changes involve no significant hazards consideration.
l
o
~
4 ATTACHMENT D Information Supporting an E.mronmental Assessment SVP-99 032 (Page 1 of 1)
Comed has evaluated this proposed operating license amendment request against the criteria for identification of licensing and regulatory actions requiring environmental assessment in accordance with 10 CFR 51.21. Comed has determined that this proposed license amendment request meets the criteria for a categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9) and as such, has determinea that no irreversible consequences exist in accordance with 10 CFR 50.92(b). l This determincion is based on the fact that this change is being proposed as an amendment to a license issued pursuant to 10 CFR 50 that changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR 20, or that changes an inspection or a surveillance requirement, and the amendment meets the following specific criteria:
(i) the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.
As demonstrated in Attachment C, this proposed amendment does not involve any significant hazards consideration.
(ii) _ there is no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite.
As documented in Attachment C, there will be no change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents released offsite.
(iii) there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The proposed changes will not result in changes in the operation or configuration of the facility. There will be no change in the level of controls or methodology used for processing of radioactive effluents or handling of solid radioactive waste, nor will the proposal result in any change in the normal radiation levels within the plant. Therefore, there will be no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure resulting from this change.
I
le le le b) b) b) a%
! ! i a% a%
Y Y eo eo Y Y Y eo t t t p3 e
t t t p3 e
Y p3 e
Y Y Y c*
c( N N N c c(
c*
c(
A A A l
e l e l e
ba )c 7' i 1 i b) a%
b) a%
Y Y eo eo Y Y N eo t t t pI e
t t t p1 e
Y p1 e
Y Y N c*
c( N N N c c( c*
c(
A A A t t t f
i A f a
. f i
L i 1 i T iL t a
L d )g 9 0 ni 4 6 e e 4 24 0 8
e A d )g ni 4 d .
d )g ni 2
0 4 3 s us 2 D us 3 d no 2 0 t A op 2 2 t
o o t
2 2 2 t
o op I us ep 2 2 2 1 1 N N 1 1 1 N I n i 1 1 1 l
u T F( -
T F( ut a F(
S fo l s A s s s e A E A l
s- ta A R D T as t
T gn s S D n o i e i T E e N e wt oro e r
e T r u U r u l u
v s s )g O s sei)g 5 lor i s
s )g 9
I i I l 0 0 0 0 0 f p 2 1 1 a B ei r s 4 6 te te 6 5 4 e F- r s 3 e ei r s 1 2 2 ht esr t
V P p 2 2 o o 2 2 2 o Pp 1
Pp 2 2 2 y
U g(
1 1 N N 1 1 1 N S g(
1 g( 1 1 1 t O a A a ht u s a Ee f F- T E T iwesr T TaS 2) S V np N 2 A L iote Em30 t
k k k fo E s n G D C I F A s n 3A t a s g s n e e e e Mae9 -
V u o 4 4 1 i 1
4 4- 1 V uo Si s uo e r
e r
e r
l c
y 1 oi i t 3 3
e 3 3 3 F oi t 3 k p ioi t C C C c I t I
9 S - e L v a 0 0 o te t o 20 0 20 o te i v a 0 e v a re er re Cn P g A ec r o 20 20 N N 0 20 0 N E e c 2 r o 0 e0 r6 ec r o t l
e I
t s s t
s u AiVa V PL - - - -
2 L PL 2 -
C21 PL y y y f T aS(P 1 1 1 1 E r O O O ht V ed n n TM T R
/
t s
ya o Af t e
E V Og ht s
ht s
h s m F T s is 8 L- A 'r p n a
n o
tn 1 s S E 0 o k A s F a$
c 2 M M M e M de e s s ht ht ht s
ht s
ht A de e hs I c1 de e 8 8 8 r e
d vm n n n S vm n t u vm 1 1 1 C
n A oi n n o o o o o oi o Nt o oi *
/
/
r n T
/
a E mT e e M M i 1 M M M i K mT e e M Ut e e e 0
9 0
9 0
9 t e
d T Ri c 2 2 t e e 2 t 2 2 t e C Ri c 2 P se Ri 1 c 9 9 9 s y
n S o o 4/ 2 o v 2 Gr v 1 1 N O v 4 4 4 u e ge r
/ /
N N / /
e ge r 4
/
e ge r - - - O N md l
o 1 1 1 o R l o n 9 01 0 P0 P 1 aS k k k a taS - taS - R e e e r a I
F- T un 2 t
un - n un I 1 1 A l 1 l l l f l e
r e
r e
r i s
M OI QQ QQQ E Oi Q d i Oi C C C m A G e nmo l
r e
r e
r e
o n
R iaC t
s y
t s
y t
s y a A b t
O O O n T o y o e bt d e
rl s ei w bu b a
n 4A 1
C D E F G 1 n 3A s n C D 1 e e 1 1 t 1 t no r t
no e no ei -
4- 4 4- 4- 4 ei - v e ei 4 -
4 -
4-m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 rt 3 l rt 3 3 3 rt 0 0 0 0 0 0 a r r a i
r a 00 r a 0 c 0 0 0 t u c 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 u c 20 v e u 2 2 e C o. - - Co -
gw Co 0-2 0- 0- i c
1 1
?
1 1
1 l 1 l
l 1 ns i e l 1 I l v r
wv l e
s-lo a l v n fo e i
s d r 7 6 3 9 5 8 r ee r 4 6 8 e l e 6 5
5 4
6 6 16 4 6 7 l e hh l e 6 6 7 t
a i ab 1 2 2 2 1 2 ab 1 TT i ab 2 2 2 re m i
re m 71 7 6 6 7 6 7 6 re m 7 : 6 6 6 i m
1 SuN K K K K K K K K SuN K K K 1 t l
I l
l 1
1 I
I I
I H l l H SuN t e B l l
l l E s
o
p p o o P) 5 3 2 8 5 7 8 P) g5 di R 1
s 3 7 6 7 5 4 4 4 di 4 nsp 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 nsp 1 it ig ig ig ig ig o c(
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o 1 i
m s s s s s p p p p p e c(
e L 8 7 7 7 7 S S S 4 5 7 8 9 T 2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
% 6 5 3
3 3
A 3 7 8 0 1 2 p T p s /
1 1
1 i
2 1
2 1
2 1 o A o l
t +
A P )R l
1 1
2 7
4 2 5 6 3
5 2
5 6 6 4 5 D P )g 8 3
u l i iasiP asp s
e T t 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 T it 1
1 A i(
n S i(
n R D i E i t
s T T e S T T S E F T E e T e e v I r L- r u
l a M T s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S m)
V I F s R 4 6 6 6 6 5 4 5 eI A
uig 53 y L E PP r S 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 r s P p 1
t Ee f E L- g(
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E g(
1 C s S T a V T a
TaS 2) N it ig ig g ig ig A L
- N 2 A m sp spp is sp p s E A Em3 a 0- fo T i
L V V Me9 I t 9 2 P E
4 3 2 S 22 32 25 26 72 T 1 1 1 2 2 L n o
F E
n o
I S - e 1 1 A
C i i
- - - - - t I t Cn Pg % 0 9 8 8 8 V i s A B C D E F G 1 L
i s A C
1 AiVa 0 0 2 3 4 o 4 4 4 4 4 o 3 1
Y E T aS(P
- 2 2 2 22 P P A / 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 R
3 TM + T d e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 / d le 0
2 Af et E l l 0 0 0 0 0- Y l 0-F a -
a A
t s
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T t s
1 L- S n E n s
I F I A M A d A S d d n E e K le a T l
l a C l a
d S t s 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 S O
t s 5 n n 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I n 1 u N I R R R Rl R R R R R I R o I '
l l l QQQQQQQQ l l l l T e g
l Q
F- ) )
k
) ) ) A n a
.k e e e e ie s s s E
s e e it i M t u G t
u A
t r r t e C r r i
C C C C i i O R O r
u s e e da da da A T
t t s sy s u u u e y r Q Q Q r r P O (
O(
( ( (
e e _
x b b ig ig ig ig ig 7 5 6 3 9 5 8 a s s s s s m 6 5 M 6 6 4 6 7 m T p p p p p u 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 u 1 2 1 0 0 0 N 7 7 6 6 7 r, 7 6 N 7 1 2 4 2
5 2
6 2
l K K K K K K K K l a
1 2 2 1 1 1 i a B B 1 B B B l I 1
i I i 1 1 r r e e S S
-