ML20134L312

Press Release II-96-96, NRC Staff Proposes $150,000 Fine Against CP&L at Brunswick

ML20134L312
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	11/20/1996
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
References
PR-II-96-096, PR-II-96-96, NUDOCS 9611200248
Download: ML20134L312 (1)

Text

! l

?

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission L Region II 101 Marietta Street. N. W.

Suite 2900 Atlanta, GA 30323

! No: 11-96-96 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact:

Ken Clark (404)331-5503 (Wednesday November 20, 1996)

Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878 NRC STAFF PROPOSES $150,000 FINE AGAINST CP&L AT BRUNSWICK The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $150.000 civil penalty against Carolina Power & Light Company for alleged violations of NRC requirements at the Brunswick nuclear power plant at Southport, North Carolina.

NRC officials said the fine was being 3roposed after an NRC inspection revealed deficiencies in the company's imp'ementation of the environmental l qualification (EO) program required by federal regulations and in corrective actions designed to correct problems identified in the program.

Federal regulations require commercial nuclear power plants to list electrical equipment important to safety, including performance specifications, electrical characteristics and environmental conditions. Each item must be qualified by testing of, or experience with, . identical or similar equipment so that' it can be expected to perform its intended function during adverse environmental conditions such as fire, water, radiation or a combination of all three.

Stewart D. Ebneter Administrator of the NRC's Region II office in Atlanta, told the company in a letter dated November 19 that an NRC inspection at Brunswick earlier this year indicated deficiencies in the E0 program which included failures to' incorporate appropriate equipment in the program, to maintain documentation of equipment qualification or to maintain accurate lists of E0 equipment. He said the company also failed to correct problems over a long period because items were closed without proper assurance that deficiencies were corrected. In addition, he said management failed to comprehend the full scope of problems and failed to provide necessary direction and focus for correcting

< the problems.

The NRC said no equipment operability problems were identified during the company's review of E0 program deficiencies.

i Tne company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either l pay the civil penalty or to protest its imposition.

N 1

9611200248 961120 POR PRESS R RO-II-96-096 PDR l 200127 fRol I ch l