ML20058N823
| ML20058N823 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1993 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9312220288 | |
| Download: ML20058N823 (8) | |
Text
-
~
Oh jy)f
+
.*/
t 6
t i
EMPl.OYEF CONCERNS PRDI3 RAMS-i PLANT NAME:
Dfiinswi1 LICENSEE:
CP8%
DOCKET #: 50-325.50- q4,,
- i NOTE:
Please indicate yes or no ac applicabin cond add comments in
't r
I tho space provided.
t A.
FROGRAM:
l 1.
Does the licensee have an employse concerns' program?- Yes 2.
Has NRC inspected the program?
No.
Origine1ly. scheduled f'
for Stept. 7 but deferred.
Manager of Quality ' Cht?ck i
anformally discusses current iscues with the Senior Resident i
I Inspector on a monthly basis.
B.
SCOPE: (Indicate all that apply.)
1.
Is it fort
- a. Technical?
You
- b. Administrative?
Yes l
- c. Personnel issues?
Yes 2.
Does it cover safety as well as non-safety issues? ' Yes-I 3.
Is it designed for:
l
- a. Nuclear safety?
Yes
- b. Personal safety?
Yes
- c. Personnel issues - including union _grievanceg?.Yes 4.
Does the program apply to all licensee employees?
Yes 63 I
/\\
9312220288 931222 l[~.
PDR ADOCK 05000324 3
- PDR, L. g.
q p
. _ g;-a y r:en p u-.3
- e..
s
s' l
l s
5.
Contractors?
You 6.
Does the licensee require its contractors and their subs to-have a similar program?
No i
7.
Does the licensee conduct an exit interview upon terminating employees asking if they'have any safety concerns? Yes.
Part of BSP-37, Employee Checkout Instructions C.
INDEPENDENCE:
1.
What is the title of the person in charge?
Manager, Duality Check i
l 2.
To whom do they report?
Manager, Nticlear-Accessment Department 3.
Are they independent of line management?
Yet 4.
Does the ECP use third party consultants?- Uses outsido t
dnpArtm=nts within CP&L corporate andfcurrentlyLhas a.
program accenstaent being performed by outside consultant hout vor it doen not normally uso outside-consultants as part i
of the pre, gram 5.
How is a concern about a manager or vice president followed up?
A review of the concern is conducted by the next' level of management.
Concerns directed agax at the Manager,
'luclear Assensment Department are immediately forwarded to 5
l Senior Vice President, Nuclear Generetion Group D.
RESOURCES:
1.
What is the size of the staf] devoted to thin. program 7
]
Foi t e.
One manager a:ed three nite reprenantatives".
i 64 en a T
rn;inci n1 togg twI:ec CFf T-TT-60.
5
y, l
l l
2.
WhAt are ECP staff qualifications (technical training, I'
interviewing training, investigator training, other)?-
Interviewing training including OJT.
Et:porienced OA/OC I
personnel in this position.
C E. REFERRALS:
r 1
1.
Who has followup on concerns (ECP staff, line management, L
i other)? ' Concern i c; idern ti fied, reviewed and classified by.
ECP staff members and then forwarded to line management I
i personnel f or investigetion and esolution.
5 F.
CONFIDENTIA1.ITY:
I 1.
Are the reports confidential?
Yes 2.
To whom is the identity of t!.s alleger mcde known (senior managrient, ECP staff, line management, other)7 Senior menagem'nt and ECP staff 3.
Can empi.2yee:s i
t
- a. be anonymous?
Yes
[q b.
report by phone?
Yes i
G. FEEDBACK:
1.
Ys feedback given to the alleger upon completten of the followup?
Yes.
Verbesl communication of results/ resolution.
2.
Does program reward good ideas?
Yes.
Good ideas.are I
rr$ warded with a letter of appreciation from the President or Chief Operating Officer.
3.
Who, or at what. level, makes the final decision of
[
resolu t1or.7 Manager. Quality Chuck f
e.
- h*eb
- e**
(f
~
1.
4 4
1 1
4.
Are the resolutions of anonymous concerns disseminated?
No, only to submitter.
H. EFFECTIVENESS:
1.
How does the licensee measure the effectivuness of tho
{
program?
The licensee has no formal measure of program effectiveness.
4 2.
Are concerns:
- a. Trended?
Yes.
Monthly status of number received and total YTD; semi-annual report to senior management.
i b.
Used?
Yes i
3.
In the last three years how many concerns were raised?
107 i
l Of the concerns raised, how many were' closed?
106
]
What percentage were substaltiated?
The licensee doen not 1
]
substantiate concerns.
4.
How are followup techniques used to measure effectiveness (random survey, interviews, other)?
A random survey conducted by senior management.
5.
How frequently are internal endits of the ECP conducted and by whnm?
Internal audits are very infrrequent; only one in the very beginning of the progran..
I. ADMINISTRATION / TRAINING:
1.
Is ECP prescribed by a procedure?
Yes 2.
How are employees, as well as contractors, made aware of this program (training, newsletter, bulletin board, other)?
Initial GET training, bulletin boards, ECP boxes located
(
throughout the plant, posters, and brochures.
66 n-t ~
.n i.v '
m g rH tHIT 80 N:T-T'- O
.)
90*d T101-
- 1
+
1 i
l e
AD,DLT.IONAL COMMENTS:
(Including characteristics which make the program especially of f ective.. if. arey. )
b i
t i
The inspne' tor reviewed the licensee's' program procedures, tih e C P & L..
i T'
Nucinar Projects Quality Check Program.and BSP-37.Brunswich Site
-l Pro cedurre Employee Checkout Instructions, and han ver ified -that the
.I E
3 icenbee meet s the ir. tent of the program, Currently, BSP-37 is unchsrooing rervision.to clarify andLformally proceduralite parts of the l
prt gram as.it i s currently implemented.
j i
i i
e I-l
.- {
v b
e i
'. l t
+
6 1
'f
.f r
?
I l
s ik f
67
+
.[
'. j
-- I
.Jo
.b.
_, _., -... ~,
.,_..,~..,,,;,,_,.-,i.e_,-..,4, i
..s ; _ ip,,
,,,M
FACSIMii[HETR'^MSMITTAD 1
i
. exxx g
& c esAce TO:..
~
g TELEPirIONE.
i
~
y, n.
3 61 VoV" 5 +E/...
v m.,,,,
(telecepter).
(Varitication) 6
- e
,'.) j. ;
- s. t.
%GES #,
i N,,
~
.r -
1...!
FROM.f.ene Ase,ua
- . C.S..aN RC u,tutt,8 WICK STCAM I;LEC1111C PLAlif e
b e
I
- "6.M**"**
. eF',(,#
. ey. 9, Arg
- * * * * * ** f
.SEP 22 '93 08:50 NRC MILLSTONE OFFICE P01 l
i i
I FACSIMILEFROMMILLSTONERESIDENTOFF b
(
MESSAGE TO:
sck n. A E o S o N O._
FROM:
l 4LbNlC NUMBER OF PAGES:-
(Including thin form) 1 MILLSTONE FAX NO.
(203) 443-5893 l
MILLGTONE P110NE NOS.
(203) 447-3179 OR 442-5357 i
,a
'h
- --'- \\
o-N
-- s
" Q J' t1
+[._]1 N
hl.
ii t.:
e s x
3 Qb n&Yf RI)'& R f
3-s
- N sJ N
r"u
/
,' ; 7'.~P e
h%Q h%
j
~
j
-. :,a
,w.
m as
_s_
s
$\\
i
- s. s y,,,
I h
A N Y
!$3'%
1 From:
H iry L N< ' orm 2 a +wroer i Mi M,
.i To:
!> N c, i HFH i Date:
F r i <. 9 -
October J.
.19 ?
4 : e.. pm
Subject:
i 12 500 / v;.~H Enp;cvne !.:on c e r n e
- Dich, fD 1 J f.
m p tye f.' aF t. rd for EOme 3 d d.i t 3 D n c j.i n terms t J on perin.tn2no to t n c.,
~1 1
>_">JO2H e s i r v e ',.
ihe additional information le provTded below.
Eor thn I:O n:m r n w e b J t h Ediraon pJante (Pyron, Dra.idwood, lion.
Dre saer, isEelIe, ano Du a ct Cities):
%cm itnm li.J.
Ihcre 2e onJt one ptrsto e s s.1 g n ed ta
!. o a m r. m.s i t h Edison fJ: ta l i ty F1rst temploye-concernej p r og r ai m.
e In21 porneo
.1 s rernoneitile ter aJ] i: 2 : p l e r, t r.
- -;u r u n 1'em H.J.
The r e.im b e r of concorn? reinea at eech plant e: ori j ' equals the number of concerns c]osed. (Jn etherwords alJ concerns i he t were r: 1 red have been closed).
Ad d i t i on a l l '/ r.
thnre was :e n error in the percent cubstant.tated co.tumn 1or uued Litier:
el? three of the concerns raised were EubEtentisted so the
- -,e r c en t a a n should have been 200%.
11 /ou have en>
turther questtons, please
.l e t me know.
Fl 9 r '; Mc-H CC:
1 h le. i WE. L 6 i
l i
1 l
l 4