ML20138M976

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:19, 29 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 851210 Meeting W/Util at Plant Re Pending Requests for Exemptions from Section III.G.2 of App R to 10CFR50 & Request for Addl Info
ML20138M976
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 12/18/1985
From: Frank Akstulewicz
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8512230299
Download: ML20138M976 (2)


Text

,

]

.. . December 18, 1985 Docket Nos. 50-213 LICENSEE: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company

-FACILITY: Haddam Neck Plant

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

ON PLANT INSPECTION OF LICENSEE FIRE PROTECTION EXEMPTION REQUESTS

'By letter dated September 16, 1985, Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company requested eight exemptions (consisting of 36 deviations) from the requirements of Section III.G.2 of Appendix R. to 10 CFR 50. On December 10, 1985, the NRC and its technical contractor met with the licensee at the Haddam Neck plant to-' discuss the pending exemption requests and the existing' request

, ' for additional' information.

The licensee and the staff went to each of the 36 locations identified in_the exemption requests. At each location, the licensee described the

' ^ current' deficiency in compliance with the necessary Appendix R requirements and described the compensatory measures (detection and/or suppression) currently existing. The licensee also described why they felt that the existing fire protection was adequate.-

H :Upon~ completion of the' plant walkdown, the staff discussed with the licensee-those areas where it . felt the existing evaluations were' inadequate and where

additional information may be necessary. In particular, the inadequacies of

~the evaluations Exemption concerning(Exemption Nos. 4, No. 5 _in 7 and 8 lack of fire dampers (structural steel) ventilation and parts of penetrations)

-were~ highlighted.

The meeting adjourned with the understanding that the contractor would review the information and provide the NRC project manager any additional requests for information necessary to support the licensees exemption requests. It was'also agreed that the licensee would respond to the existiro and future L ' requests for information simultaneously to assure the completeness of the i

response package.

Original signed by: F. Akstulewicz Francis M. Akstulewicz Integrated Safety Assessment Project Directorate Division of PWR Licensing - B cc: See Next Page DISTRIBUTION QDocketJ11e;d FAkstulewicz E. Jordan ISAPD Reading JStang B. Grimes NRC PDR DKubicki J. Partlow Local PDR FMiraglia PAnderson NSIC OELD ACRS (10)

JI R-B ISAPD:PWR-B IS P FAkstulewicz CGrimes 12/pg /85 12/f/85 12/fy/85 f

F512230299 851218 i PDR ADOCK 05000213 C~F PDR

, Mr. John F. Opeka Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Haddam Neck Plant cc:

Gerald Garfield, Esquire Kevin McCarthy, Director Day, Berry.& Howard Radiation Control Unit Counselors at Law Department of Environmental City Place Protection Hartford, Connecticut 06103-3499 State Office Building Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Superintendent Haddam Neck Plant RDF 11 Post Office Box 127E East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Edward J. Mroczka Vice President, Nuclear Operations Northeast Utilities Service Company Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Board of Selectmen Town Hall Haddam, Connecticut 06103 State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management ATTN: Under Secretary Energy Division 80 Washington Street Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Resident Inspector Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Station c/o U.S. NRC East Haddam Post Office East Haddam, Connecticut 06423 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

.