ML20206M037
| ML20206M037 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1986 |
| From: | Frank Akstulewicz Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608200437 | |
| Download: ML20206M037 (19) | |
Text
August 8,1986 Docket No. 50-213 LICENSEE:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company FACILITY:
Haddam Neck Plant
SUBJECT:
MEETING MINUTES FOR THE MAY 8, 1986 PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM WORKING MEETING FOR THE HADDAM NECK PLANT A working meeting was held at the NRC Region I offices in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, with Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company and NRC represen-tatives on May 8,1986, to discuss the questions resulting from the review of the Haddam Neck pump and valve inservice testing (IST) program and the licen-see's responses to those questions. is a listing of the questions that served as the agenda for the meeting and the response to those questions, as taken from the meeting minute:.
The utility representatives were given a brief introduction outlining the agenda and the methods used for documentation of the questions and responses.
This was followed by detailed discussions of specific pumps and valves in the Haddam Neck IST program. These discussions resulted in 11 open items for the licensee. Nine of the 11 open items were discussed in telephone calls with NRC and Connecticut Yankee representatives on May 13 and 14, 1986, and 5 open items were subsequently resolved.
Also discussed during the telephone conversations were the licensee's responses to those questions not formally documented in the NRC letter, dated March 5, 1986. There is one items that remains open.
Notes taken from these calls are included in Enclosure 2 to this report.
NRR is currently preparing a letter to be sent to the licensee concerning IST for the e,mergency diesel generator auxiliary systems. Open items pertaining to diesel generator auxiliaries are to be addressed in a forthcoming letter.
Within 20 days of receipt of these meeting minutes, we request that the licensee provide the NRC Project Manager, in a revision to the previously submitted IST program, with a schedule for providing the information end clarifications discussed in these meeting minutes.
Original signed by:
F. Akstulewicz.
8608200437 860808 Francis M. Akstulewicz, Project Manager PDR ADOCK 05000213 Integratated Safety Assessment l
P PDR Project Directorate l
Division of PWR Licensing - b DISTRIBUTION l
Enclosures:
As stated 4
. Docket File ISAP Reading ACRS (10) cc: See Nexy,Page Local PDR BGrimes ISAP:DPL-Bff4/$
ISAP:DPL ISAP:DPL-NRC PDR Edordan FAkstulewicz:lt PAnderson CGrimes CGrimes OGC 08/6/86 08/$/86 08/%/86 FAkstulewicz PAnderson
l l
/
UNITED STATES g
- t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
e q
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
=
i
(
/
August 8,1986
)
Docket No. 50-213 LICENSEE:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company FACILITY:
Haddam Neck Plant
SUBJECT:
MEETING MINUTES FOR THE MAY 8, 1986 PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM WORKING MEETING FOR THE HADDAM NECK PLANT A working meeting was held at the NRC Region I offices in King of Prussia,
'1 Pennsylvania, with Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company and NRC represen-tatives on May 8,1986, to discuss the questions resulting from the review of the.Haddam Neck pump and valve inservice testing (IST) program and the licen-see's responses to those questions. Enclosure 1 is a listing of the questions that served as the agenda for the meeting and the response to those questions, as taken from the meeting minutes.
The utility representatives were given a brief introduction outlining the agenda and the methods used for documentation of the questions and responses.
This was followed by detailed discussions of specific pumps and valves in the Haddam Neck IST program. These discussions resulted in 11 open items for the licensee. Nine of the 11 open items were discussed in telephone calls with NRC and Connecticut Yankee representatives on May 13 and 14,1986, and 5 open items were subsequently resolved.
Also discussed during the telephone conversations were the licensee's responses to those questions not formally documented in the NRC letter, dated March 5, 1986. There is one items that remains open. Notes taken from these calls are included in Enclosure 2 to this report. NRR is currently preparing a letter to be sent to the licensee concerning IST for the emergency diesel generator auxiliary systems. Open items pertaining to diesel generator auxiliaries are to -
be addressed in a forthcoming letter.
Within 20 days of receipt of these meeting minutes, we request that the licensee provide the NRC Project Manager, in a revi_sion to the previously submitted IST program, with a schedule for providing the infonnation and clarifications discussed in these meeting minutes.
F.
Francis M. Akstulewicz, Projec Manager Integratated Safety Assessment Project Directorate Division of PWR Licensing - B
Enclosures:
As stated cc: See Next Page
\\
l f
Mr. John F. Opeka Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Haddam Neck Plant cc:
Gerald Garfield, Esquire Kevin McCarthy, Director Day, Berry & Howard Radiation Control Unit Counselors at Law Department of Environmental City Place Protection Hartford, Connecticut 06103-3499 State Office Building Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Superintendent a
Haddam Neck Plant Richard M. Kacich, Supervisor RDF #1 Operating Nuclear Plant Licensing Post Office Box 127E Northeast Utilities' Service Company East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Edward J. Mroczka Vice President, Nuclear Operations Northeast Utilities Service Company l
Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Board of Selectmen Town Hall Haddam, Connecticut 06103 State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management ATTN: Under Secretary Energy Division 80 Washington Street Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Resident Inspector Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Station i
c/o U.S. NRC East Haddam Post Of_fice East Haddam, Connecticut 06423 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission 631 Park Avenue i
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 N
s*
ATTENDANCE LIST INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM WORKING MEETING PLANT: Haddam Neck DATES: May 8, 1986 l
NAME REPRESENTING D. Cephton NRC - RI P. Bissett NRC - RI A. Finkel NRC - RI F. Akstulewicz NRC - NRR L. Bettenhausen NRC - RI J. DeLawrence Connecticut Yankee J. Powers Connecticut Yankee d
n
_---7
-w
_-w
t General Question and Comments on the IST Program at the Haddam Neck Plant 1.0 What is the status of agreed upon Engineering Evaluations to be performed for Charging Pumps P-18-1A, P-18-18, inlet pressures (re: 1981SER)?
2.0 Same as above for Residual Heat Removal Pumps, P-14-1A and P-14-1B (re: 1981SER).
1 l
Response: A letter was issued on March 12, 1984 which detailed the results of the engineering evaluations.
The written response was satisfactory.
i 3.0 What testing program actions are provided for Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) auxiliary systems pumps that fall under the testing requirements of ASME Section XI, Subsection IWP?
l A staff letter is scheduled to be issued requiring the licensee to include EDG auxiliaries in the IST program.
Open Item For Licensee:
Determine testing program for EDG auxiliary systems pumps upon receipt of NRC letter.
i 4.0 The following items are typographical errors. Licensee response to the following was satisfactory.
l a.
As listed on page 1 of IST submittal, should PRS 0V0522A be PR-SOV-522A?
Response
PR-S0V-522A is correct. The IST submittal will be corrected.
i e
b.
' Valves CD-CV-872A&B, as listed in various sections of the IST submittal, are shown as SI-CV-872A&B on P&ID 26010. What system designation is correct?
Same as a'bove except for valves CD-MOV-871A&B7 c.
i Response: Valves SI-CV-872 A&B and SI-CV-871 A&B are correct. The IST submittal will be corrected, d.
AFW pump, P-32-1A, discharge check valve is shown as FW-CV-184 on P&ID 26013-1 but listed as FW-CV-153B on the IST submittal. Which is correct?
Response
FW-CV-184 is the correct valve designation. The IST submittal was in error and will be corrected.
i
e.
AFW Pump P-32-IB, discharge check valve is shown as FW-CV-153 on P&ID 26013-1, but listed as FW-CV-184 on the IST submittal. Which I
is correct?
Response
FW-CV-153 is the correct valve designation. The IST was in error and will be corrected.
f.
Valves SF-CV-866A and SF-CV-8668, as listed on the IST submittal are shown as SF-CV-812 and SF-CV-866 respectively on P&ID 26049. Which is correct?
Response: SF-CV-812 and SF-CV-866 valves as shown on P&ID 26049 are correct. The IST submittal will be corrected.
9 SS-V-984A, as listed on IST submittal, appears to be shown as WG-V-984A on P&ID 26007-2. Which is correct?
Response: Valve WG-V-984A as shown on P&ID 26007-2 is correct. The IST submittal will be corrected.
h.
RH-MOV-338, as listed on the IST submittal, is shown as RA-M0V-338 on P&ID 26018-3. Which is correct?
RH-MOV-780, as listed on the IST submittal, is shown as RC-MOV-780 on P&ID 26007-1. Which is correct?
Response: RH-M0V-338 and RH-M0V-780 valves, as listed on the IST submittals, are correct. P&ID 26018-3 and 26007-1 will be corrected.
1.
RH-MOV-29 is shown on P&ID 26028 as a normally open valve, however, it is shown on IST submittal as a normally closed valve. Which is correct?
Response: RH-MOV-29 is a normally closed valve. The P&ID 26028 will be corrected.
j.
RH-MOV-23, is listed on the IST submittal as normally closed valve, but is shown on P&ID 26028 as normally open. Which is correct?
Response: RH-MOV-23 is a normally closed valve. The P&ID 26028 will be corrected.
k.
DH-M0V-311 is shown as normally closed on P&ID 26019-1, but as normally open on IST submittal and ISI boundary diagram. Which is the correct position?
Response: DH-MOV-311 is a normally closed valve. The IST program and IST boundary diagram will be corrected.
I t
1.
MS-HICV-1201 is listed as a normally closed valve on the IST submit-tal; however, it is shown as a nomally open valve on P&ID 26012-1.
Which is correct?
MS-PICV-1206A&B are listed as nomally closed on the IST submittal; however, they are shown as normally open on P&ID 26012-1. Which is correct?
Response: The MS-HICV-1201 and MS-PICV-1206 A&B valves are normally I
closed as shown on the IST submittal.
P&ID 26012-1 will be corrected.
m.
FW-HICV-1301-1,2,3 & 4, are listed as nonna11y closed valves on the IST submittal, but are shown as normally open on P&ID 26013-1. Which is correct?
Response: The FW-HICV-1201,2,3,4 valves, as listed on the IST sub-mittal, are correct. The P&ID will be corrected, n.
FW-CV-156-1,2,3,4 are listed as nomally closed valves' on the IST submittal, but are shown as normally open on P&ID 26013-1.
Response: The FW-CV-156-1,2,3,4 valves as listed on the IST submittal are correct. The P&ID will be corrected, o.
WG-A0V-558, as listed on IST submittal, is shown as WG-FCV-558 on P&ID 26007-2. Which is correct?
Response: The WG-A0V-558 valve as listed on the IST submittal is correct. The P&ID will be corrected.
p.
BV-1-1B is listed as a locked-closed butterfly valve on the IST submittal, but is shown as a nomally open gate valve on P&ID 26024.
I Which is correct?
q.
BV-1-1A is listed as a locked-closed valve on the IST submittal, but is shown as a normally open valve on P&ID 26024. Which is correct?
Response: The BV-1-1B and BV-1-1A valves as listed on the IST submit-tal are correct. The P&ID 26024 will be corrected.
r.
LD-A0V-202, as listed on IST submittal, is shown as LD-FCV-202 on P&ID 26018-1. Which is correct?
1 Response: The LD-A0V-202 valve listed on the IST submittal is correct.
l The P&ID 26018-1 will be corrected.
s.
FM-MOV-31, as listed on the IST submittal, is shown as RH-MOV-31 on P&ID 26d56-1. Which is correct?
Response
RH-MOV-31 is the correct valve designation. The IST submittal will be corrected.
. 1 l
D
t.
SW-A0V-129 & 130, as listed on the IST submittal, are shown as
~
SW-FCV-129 & 130 on P&ID 26014-1. Which is correct?
Response: SW-A0V-129 and 130 as listed on the IST submittal are correct; the P&ID 26014-1 will be corrected.
5.0 Why can't the below listed valves be exercised during cold shutdowns vice reactor refuelings?
PR-S0V-522A RC-S0V-596A PR-50V-522B RC-S0V-596B PR-50V-522C RC-SOV-596C PR-SOV-522D RC-S0V-596D Response: The valves can be exercised during cold shutdown and will be tested accordingly.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
6.0 Provide a more technical justification for not full stroke exercising valves SI-CV-103,107A&B, and CD(SI)-CV-872A&B in accordance with the code specified frequency (with the maximum time interval being two years).
I Provide a more technical justification for not full stroke exercising valves SI-CV-856A&B and SI-CV-862A,B,C&D in accordance with the code specified frequency (with the maximum time interval being two years).
Response
Insufficient engineering justification for not performing the 24 month test. OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE 7.0 For item 6.0 above, why is there no mention of part-stroking as previously addressed in the 1981 SER?
Response
Full stroke exercising of the valves will be perfonned.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
8.0 Why are valves CD (SI)-MOV-871A&B listed as category B and not category A valves, since they serve also as a pressure isolation function?
Response: Valves SI-MOV-871A/B and check valves SI-CV-872 A/B are welded together. The check valve and MOV are tested together. There is no way to leak test the MOVs. The check valves are category A/C valves and are therefore leak tested.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
2 k
< l
9.0 Why is a leak test relief request not needed to be submitted for CD-(SI)-MOV-871A&B?
Response: A leak test relief request was included in the IST submittal for the reasons as stated above.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
10.0 Is SI-V-102 a locked open (L.O.) valve? If so, it's not indicated as such on P&ID 26010.
Is SI-V-873 a L.O. valve? If so, it's not indicated as such on P&ID 26010.
Response: Both SI-V-102 and SI-V-873 are locked opened valves.
P&ID 26010 will be corrected.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
11.0 Why is RH-MOV-784 not part of the IST program submittal?
Response: RH-MOV-784 should be RH-MOV-874 and was a typographical error in the NRC letter. RH-M0V-874 will be placed in the IST program.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
12.0 Why should valve RH-M0Y-874 not be categorized category B?
Response: RH-MOV-874 is a category B valve and was omitted in the IST submittal. The testing frequency needs to be addressed. OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
13.0 Why cannot valve RH-MOV-29 be exercised in accordance with the Code specified frequency?
Response: Rif-MOV-29 will be tested quarterly.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
14.0 Is RH-MOV-21 a locked closed valve? Its designation on IST/ISI boundary diagrams is unclear.
Response: RH-MOV-21 valve was misread as RA-M0V-21.
It is a locked closed valve with breaker locked open.
It is not a safety-related valve.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
15.0 Provide a more technical justification for not full stroke exercising valves RH-CV-783 and RH-CV-808 in accordance with the specified Code fre-quency (with the maximum testing interval being two years). Also, when was RH-CV-808 disassembled?
Response: To full stroke the containment sump valves would require the RHR to be taken out of service and the reactor core unloaded. The unloading of the core at the 10 year cycle is when they would full stroke the sump valves. A few years ago the valves were disassembled and no problems were found with the valves. However, neither this full stroke nor disassembly frequency falls within the maximum testing interval of 2 years. OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
The staff normally accepts no relief request for frequencies greater than 2 years. The licensee should investigate alternate means of complying with the code specified frequency including design changes, alternate flow paths to maintain decay heat removal, including necessary technical specification change.
16.0 RWST to charging pump suction check valve is shown as BA-CV-372 on IST submittal valve list and P&ID 26018-3, but is shown as BA-CV-372A on IST relief request narrative section and ISI boundary diagram. Which is correct?
Response: Valve BA-CV-372A is the correct listing. Necessary corrections to the IST submittal and P&ID will be made.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
~
17.0 CH-M0Y-331 on IST submittal lists relief request for exercising; however, no justification is given for this relief.
Valve CH-M0V-331 is listed as a containment isolation valve per Technical Specification Table 3.11-1, page 3.20C.
However, this valve is Tisted as a Category B valve in the IST submittal. This is in conflict with the T.S.
Please explain.
Response: CH-MOV-331 has no safety-related function and does not need to be included the IST program. The relief request will be withdrawn.
The licensee's response was satisfactory.
However, there is a question as to whether or not a T.S. change should be made in reference to T.S. Table 3.11-1.
This remains an OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
e 7,
18.0 CH-MOV-331 lists no limiting stroke time? Why not?
Response: CH-M0V-331 is always closed and serves no safety-related
)
function.
It has no impact on accident analysis and does not need to be included in the IST program, i
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
19.0 Is DH-MOV-311 motor-operated or hand-operated? It is shown as a manual valve on P&ID 26018-1. Which is correct?
Response: DH-MOV-311 should be DH-V-311 and is a hand-operated valve.
The P&ID is correct. The IST submittal will be corrected.
If DH-MOV-311 is motor operated, should it have a limiting stroke time?
Response: DH-MOV-311, as stated above, is DH-V-311 and is not a motor operated valve.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
20.0 What is the normal position of DH-M0V-310?
Response: Normal position of DH-MOV-310 is closed.
P&ID and IST corrections will be made.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
21.0 If DH-MOV-311 is a passive valve, then why is a relief being requested (IWPTable3700-1)?
Response: DH-V-311 is a passive valve that is tested for leakage since it is a category 'A' valve. Relief was for cold shutdown exercising.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
22.0 What is the limiting stroke time for valve MS-HICV-1201, MS-TV-1212 and MS-TV-1213?
Response: The MS-HICV-1201 has a limiting stroke time of 90 seconds, the MS-TV-1212 and MS-TV-1213 have a limiting stroke time of 60 seconds.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
23.0 Provide justification for not exercising valves MS-TV-1212 and MS-TV-1213 l
in accordance with the Code specified frequency.
Res)onse: The licensee will evaluate the valves for quarterly testing.
OPEi ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
l -
l l
l 24.0 Valves MS-TV-1212 and 1213 are listed as containment isolation valves per Technical Specification Table 3.11-1, page 3-200.
Yet they are listed as Category B valves in the IST submittal. This is in conflict with the T.S.
Explain.
Response: These are not containment isolation valves. The licensee will determine if a leakage test is required. OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
25.0 Why are valves FW-CV-143-1,2,3,&4 verified in the open direction only?
Response: These valves are not relied upon to perform a containment isolation function.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
26.0 Provide justification for not exercising FW-CV-143-1,2,3,4 in accordance with the Code specified frequency.
I Response: No relief request required or requested.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
27.0 What is the limiting stroke time requirement for FM-MOV-1607 Response: The limiting stroke time is 35 seconds for valve FM-M0V-160.
1 The licensee's response is satisfactory.
28.0 Why aren't valves FW-CV-182, FW-CV-192, 194, 196 and 198 exercised accord-ing to the Code frequency requirements?
Response: No credit has been taken for the " Auxiliary Feed System",
penetration #81 which includes FW-CV-182,192,194.196 and 198. Refer-ence 1982 SEP, 2H, Type C Test.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
29.0 FW-MOV-160 is shown as open on P&ID 26013-1, closed on ISI boundary diagram, and open/ closed on IST submittal. Which is correct?
Response
FW-MOV-160 is normally open, the ISI toundary diagram IST submittal were in error.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.,
~
30.0 The following valves, previously included in the 1977 IST program submittal, are not listed in the most recent submittal. Why? Please address each group of valves individually.
BD-V-506 CH-CV-305A BD-V-515 CH-CV-305B BD-Y-522 CH-CV-305C BD-V-529 CH-CV-305D BD-TV-1312-1 FW-CV-192 BD-TV-1312-2 FW-CV-194 BD-TV-1312-3 FW-CV-196 BD-TV-1312-4 FW-CV-198 VH-V-507 VH-V-507B Response: BD-V-506,515,522,529, BD-TV-1312-1,-2,-3.-4 and CH-CV-305A, B.C.D valves will be included in the IST program. VH-V-507 and 5078 have been renumbered and are now VH-V-522 and 525 respectively, and they, too, will be included in the IST program.
FW-CV-192,194,196,198 are not part of the IST program as discussed above in item 28.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
31.0 What is the normal position of the following valves? The positions are not shown on the IST submittal.
VS-CV-1103 CC-CV-721 CC-CV-731 VS-CV-1104 Response: The VS-CV-1103 and 1104 valves are normally open and the CC-CV-721 and 731 valves are nonnally closed. The IST submittal will be corrected.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
32.0 What is the limiting stroke time for FM-MOV-31?
Response: The FM-MOV-31 is a passive valve, and stroke time is not required. Correct valve designation should be RH-MOV-31. The necessary corrections will be made.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
~
33.0 What are the P&ID locations of WD-HICV-1840 and WD-TV-18467
Response
Drawing 16103-27072, Revision 4 shows valve locations. Will send copy to NRC for review.
1 i
4 l
34.0 Is valve designator S0V-12-1 correct? Or is it VS-50V-12-1? What is its P&ID location?
Response: Valve VS-S0V-12-1 is the correct valve designation and is located on P&ID 16103-26057. Corrections will be made to the IST program and the P&ID will be provided for review.
The licensee's response is acceptable, i
35.0 Should valves CH-MOV-314, 313, 312, and 311 be included in the IST l
program? If not, why not?
i Response: The licensee will include above valves in the IST program. The 4
licensee's response is satisfactory.
36.0 Should RH-CV-35 (shown as FM-CV-35 on P&ID 26056-1) be included in the IST program? If not, why not? Also it is shown as CV-24 on ISI boundary diagram. Which one is correct?
Response: The licensee would like to review this further.
OPEN ITEM i
FOR LICENSEE.
37.0 Provide an explanation as to why the following valves are considered
" passive"?
CC-TV-1411 CC-FCV-608 l
CH-TV-334 FM(RH)MOV-31 Response: The licensee would like to review this further. OPEN ITEM i
FOR LICENSEE.
i 38.0 What are the P&ID locations for the following valves?
SS-50V-150A,B C.D i
SS-SOV-151A,B.C.D l
Res>onse: The above listed valves can be found on P&ID 16103-26057. The P&I) will be provided.
The licensee's response is satisfactory.
39.0 Should SW-MOV-30 (emergency fire water supply to service water) be included in the IST program? If not, why not?
i l
Response: This is an appendix R item and is not safety-related.
The licensee's response is satisfactory..
-__,c, c____m.,,__._.__.__._...___m_ _,
,-__,._g
,,r,
,v._,.,_,_,,.,,-__.-___.,__..___,,,,_m..
40.0 Is DH-RV-1847 included in the IST program?
It is listed under Table IWV-3, but is not under any of the valve system listings.
Should CH-RV-332 be included in the IST program? If not, why not?
Response: The licensee would like to review this further. OPEN ITEM FOR LICENSEE.
41.0 No components are listed for the EDG auxiliary systems.
Explain why the IST program does not include valves of the following systems:
Fuel Oil Storage and Transfer System Cooling Water System Starting System Lubrication System Combustion Air Intake & Exhaust System As discussed in item 3.0, the diesel generator auxiliary system pumps and valves are to be discussed by the NRC in a forthcoming letter.
1 OPEN ITEM FOR LICENSEE. Determine testing program for EDG auxiliary systems valves upon receipt of NRC letter.
l l
,. _. ~
Sumary of Telecon on IST Program at the Haddam Neck Plant on May 13 and 14, 1986 The items discussed during the telephone conversations were those items that were identified as OPEN ITEMS in the minutes of the working meeting held on May 8, 1986.
General Questions and Comments 6.0 The licensee would like to perform a full flow test once every five years.
Development of pump curves would be used to demonstrate operability of valves in question at less than full flow.
Less than full flow tests 4
j would be performed each refueling.
It was agreed upon that a written i
description and technical evaluation will be provided to the NRC for j
. their review.
This remains an OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
j 12.0 The testing frequency for RH-MOV-874 will be quarterly.
This item is closed.
)
15.0 The licensee would prefer to inspect these valves at a frequency of every 1
five years or at anytime whenever the core is unloaded, whichever is less.
This frequency, however, still does not meet the code specified frequency (with the maximum time interval being two years). The licensee is re-quested to reevaluate other alternative means of testing such that the code specified frequency can be met.
J This remains an OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
17.0 The licensee is evaluating the need for a T.S. change to Table 3.11-1.
i This remains an OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
(
23.0 Valves MS-TV-1212 and MS-TV-1213 are to be removed from the IST program, however, until such time they will be tested quarterly.
This item is closed.
~
?
24.0 MS-TV-1212 and MS-TV-1213 receive a containment isolation signal; however, j
they are not containment isolation valves and no leakage test is required.
i The licensee's response is satisfactory for any IST concern, however there 1s 4. question as to whether or not a T.S. chan e should be made in refer-ence to T.S. Table 3.11-1.
(See also item 17.
This remains an OPEN i
ITEM FOR~THE LICENSEE.
36.0 RH-CV-35 is the correct valve, designation.
It performs no safety-related function, nor is it subject to Appendix J leak test requirements.
This item is closed.
37.0 CC-TV-1411, CC-FCV-608 and CH-TV-334 do not receive any Safety Injection or Containment Isolation signal. They are, therefore, not required to change positions; RH-MOV-31 does not perform any safety-related function, nor is it required to change position.
This item is closed.
40.0 DH-RV-1847 and CH-RV-332 will be included in the IST program.
This item is closed.
During an onsite inspection conducted during the week of April 29-May 2, an additional listing of valves were provided to the licensee. These valves were included in the 1977 IST submittal, but were not part of the 1984 revised sub-mittal. Explanations as to why are provided below.
RC-MOV-510 RC-MOV-515 RC-MOV-528 RC-MOV-577 Performs no safety-related function; used only for loop temperature equalization.
RC-MOV-501 RC-MOV-526 RC-MOV-512 RC-M0V-537 RC-MOV-513 RC-MOV-538 RC-MOV-524 RC-M0V-546 Performs no safety-related function; these valves are used for maintenance purposes only.
RC-CV-509 RC-CV-523 RC-CV-536 RC-CV-545 Currently being evaluated by the licensee. This is an OPEN ITEM FOR THE LICENSEE.
PR-A0V-568 PR-A0V-570 PR-A0V-573 PR-A0V-574 The licensee will include these valves in the IST program as Category B valves and will test them during cold shutdowns.
FH-FCV-295 FH-MOV-344 l
Performs no safety-related function.
RH-CV-784 RH-CV-874 Performs no safety-related function.
LD-LCF-100 LD-PCV-113 LD-TCV-113A LD-TCV-113B LD-CV-322 Performs no safety-related function.
PU-CV-246(nowdesignatedNG-CV-407)
PU-V-250 Performs no safety-related function.
CH-CV-262 CH-A0V-278 CH-MOV-298 The licensee will add these valves to the IST program as Category A/C B. and B valves respectively. Test frequency will be at refueling for CH-CV-262; quarterly for CH-A0V-278; and cold shutdown for CH-MOV-298.
CH-CV-260 CH-CV-277 CH-MOV-290 CH-V-325 CH-CV-326 CH-V-343A,B,C,D Performs no safety-related function.
t BA-FCV-1128 BA-FCV-112C BA-CV-353 BA-CV-365 BA-CV-372A BA-V-391 Performs no safety-related function.
PW-CV-358 PW-Y-772 l __ __
l
)*
Performs no safety-related function.
DH-CV-383A Performs no safety-related function.
DH-TV-554 The licensee will add this valve to the IST program as a Category A valve and will test it during refueling.
CC-TCV-112 CC-CV-703A,B,C CC-RV-763A,B CC-RV-777 CC-CV-886 Performs no safety-related function.
SW-CV-282 SW-HCV-1412 SW-A0V-607(606)
Performs no safety-related function.
1 e
1 0
)
i '
__..