ML030800492

NMC Internal Correspondence, Managing Risk for On-line Work

ML030800492
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	11/08/2002
From:	James Anderson Nuclear Management Co
To:	Andersen J, Boesch J, Cayia F, Cruise B, Dyzak D, Erdman H, Farrand T, French D, Geier R, Guynes R, Hamilton J, Hoefert N, Krukowski B, Laing D, Leclair D, Leclair G, Reding R, Reeves D, Schoon D, Daniel Schroeder, Staskal T, Strharsky J, Sukeforth S, Turner P, Varga D, Wilson W, Winget R, Wood R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Management Co
References
FOIA/PA-2003-0094
Download: ML030800492 (2)

Text

INTERNAL NMC ,CORRESPONDENCE NPM 2002-0598 To: Dan Reeves Rob Geier Bob Krukowski Dick Varga (Y1 John Boesch Jerry Strharsky Dave Schroeder Duane Schoon Norm Hoefert Rick Wood Ron Winget Tom Staskal Fred Cayia Rick Reding Dave French Don LeClair Gene LeClair Wayne Wilson Scott Sukeforth Jim Hamilton Bobby Cruise Dave Dyzak Patrick C. Turner James Andersen Harold Erdman Dan Laing Ron Guynes Terry Farrand All SRO's All STA's From: John Anderson

Subject:

MANAGING RISK FOR ON-LINE WORK Copy To: John Anderson mode "In order to conservatively model risk following the identification of a possible common entered risk factors to model failure in the Auxiliary Feedwater Recirc line, the PRA group has this possible failure."

so In the interim, it is prudent for us to establish/reinforce guidance for scheduling on-line work will that overall risk is managed acceptably. The following expectations, to the extent practical, help manage further risk accumulation for 2002.

in order

?? Care shall be taken in scheduling out-of-service time for risk-significant equipment to minimize simultaneous unavailability of such equipment.

?? Tagging activities shall be arranged to minimize out-of-service time for risk-significant to equipment; i.e., Operations should tag equipment just prior to start of work, and clear tags allow prompt return-to-service following completion of work.

9? Maintenance and job support coverage shall be arranged in order to minimize out-of-service work time for risk-significant equipment. MTAM 2.1 guidance for coverage for emergent considered when setting the should be considered. Actual plant configuration should be

4" e_.-

NPM 2002-0598 November 8, 2002 Page 2

?? Emergent risk-significant equipment failures shall be promptly evaluated with Safety Monitor to allow early identification of risk mitigating measures.. Operations should perform this evaluation, and request support from NSA to identify effective mitigation measures.

Your support in meeting these expectations is appreciated.

Sincerely, John Anderson Manager, Production Planning