CPSES-200300852, Annual Environmental Operating Report for 2002

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:51, 22 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Environmental Operating Report for 2002
ML031250565
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2003
From: Walker R
TXU Energy
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CPSES-200300852, RP-52, TXX-03082
Download: ML031250565 (11)


Text

EhW'4AW TXu TX4 TXU Energy C. Lance Terry Comanche Peak Steam Senior Vice President &

Electric Station Principal Nuclear Officer RO. Box 1002 (E01)

Glen RoseTX 76043 Tel: 254 897 8920 Fax: 254 897 6652 lance.terry@txu.com CPSES-200300852 Log # TXX-03082 RP-52 April 29, 2003 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 2002 Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix B to CPSES Unit 1 and Unit 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-87 and NPF-89, respectively), attached is the CPSES Annual Environmental Operating Report for year 2002.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Bruce Turner at (254) 897-8901.

A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway

  • Comanche Peak
  • Diablo Canyon
  • Palo Verde
  • Wolf Creek

A TxU CPSES-200300852 TXX-03082 Page 2 of 2 This communication contains no new licensing basis commitments regarding CPSES Units 1 and 2.

Sincerely, TXU Generation Company LP By: TXU Generation Management Company LLC Its General Partner C. L. Terry Senior Vice President & Principal Nuclear Officer By: i)&t A Roger'6. Walker Regulatory Affairs Manager CLW/clw Attachment c - E. W. Merschoff, Region IV w/attch.

W. D. Johnson, Region IV (clo)

D. H. Jaffe, NRR (clo)

Resident Inspectors, CPSES w/attch.

TXU ELECTRIC COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 & 2 2002 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)

FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. NPF-87 & 89

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 2 of 9 I. INTRODUCTION This report describes implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the calender year 2002 as required by Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-87

& 89 for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES) for Units 1 & 2.

During 2002, the CPSES Nonradiological Environmental Monitoring Program was effective in implementing and monitoring all of CPSES's environmental regulatory commitments.

Program effectiveness was substantiated by environmental audits conducted in 2002 by in-house compliance visits by TXU Environmental, Health, and Safety and compliance evaluations conducted by the CPSES Nuclear Overview Department.

II. SCOPE Section 5.4.1 of the EPP requires that CPSES submit to the NRC an Annual Environmental Operating report that shall address the following environmental protection activities:

A. Summaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities required by Section 4.2 of the EPP, including a comparison with related preoperational studies, operational controls (as appropriate), and previous nonradiological environmental monitoring reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of plant operation on the environment. If harmful effects or evidence of trends toward irreversible damage to the environment are observed, a detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of mitigating action is required.

Section 4.2 of the EPP pertains to results from:

1. Groundwater levels and station water use monitoring.
2. Water treatment facility outages impact assessment and reporting.

B. The report shall also include:

1. A list of EPP noncompliances and the associated corrective actions.
2. A list of all changes in station design and operation, tests, and experiments made in accordance with Subsection 3.1 of the EPP which involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question.
3. A list of nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP.
4. A summary list of Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) permit related reports relative to matters identified in Subsection 2.1 of the EPP which were submitted to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) during the report period. Subsection 2.1 of the EPP pertains to aquatic matters that are addressed by the effluent limitations, and the monitoring requirements contained in the TCEQ TPDES station wastewater discharge permit.

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 3 of 9 III. RESULTS OF ACTIVITIES A. As required by Subsection 4.2 of the EPP, the following are summaries and analyses of the environmental protection activities during 2002. Based on the results of these activities, there were no observed adverse environmental impacts resulting from plant operation during 2002.

Groundwater Pumpage As indicated in Table 1, groundwater pumpage during 2002 averaged 22.0 gals./min. (gpm) or 11,541,100 total gallons withdrawn for the year. This withdrawal rate represents a 12% increase from the 2001 average rate of 19.7 gpm. Groundwater withdrawal was highest in October at 29.0 gpm and lowest in November with an average withdrawal rate of 16.7 gpm.

Groundwater withdrawn during 2002 was used primarily for potable and sanitary purposes with only a very small amount used as make-up to the plant fire protection system. No groundwater was used to supplement the station's Surface Water Treatment System.

The average annual pumpage rate of 22.0 gpm for 2002 represents 17.3%

of the predicted operational pumpage (127 gpm) identified in Section 3.3 of the Station's Environmental Report - Operational License Stage. This rate also represents approximately 13.9% of the actual average withdrawal rate (158 gpm) reported in the Station's Final Environmental Statement -

Operating License Stage (Section 5.3.1.2) for the period 1975 to May 1979.

The combined annual rate for all recorded preoperational groundwater pumpage averaged 68.8 gpm, while the average operational pumpage for the period 1990 through 2002 was *29.0 gpm. Therefore, the average operational rates are 58% less than the groundwater pumpage during the preoperational period. Figure 1 illustrates the annual fluctuation of groundwater withdrawal over the entire preoperational and operational period.

  • This data was originally reported as 32.3 for 2001; however, actual average for that reporting period was 29.6 gpm.)
2. Groundwater Levels As indicated in Table 2, the groundwater level in the on-site observation well OB-3 (intersection of Highway 56 and the Plant Access Road) fluctuated during 2002 from a high level in June of 528.1 ft. Mean Sea Level (MSL) to a low level in January of 524.1 ft. MSL. Overall, the water level in OB-3 during the reporting period (January through December) increased 1.8 ft.

(0.6m).

The 2002 annual average groundwater levels in well OB-3 and OB-4 were 525.7 ft. MSL and 559.7 ft. MSL, respectively. These average levels demonstrated an increase of 0.3 ft. (0.1 m) for OB-3 and an increase of 2.9 ft. (0.9m) for OB-4 from the respective average 2001 levels (Figure 2).

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 4 of 9

3. Surface Water Treatment System Operation The station's Water Treatment System processed 174,375,900 total gallons (331.8 gpm) of surface water during 2002 for plant process use. There were no outages during 2002 that required reporting in accordance with Section 4.2.2 of the EPP.

The following is a summary list of monthly surface water usage:

MONTH SURFACE WATER PROCESSED (GALS.)

JANUARY 14,961,900 FEBRUARY 14,106,100 MARCH 11,957,400 APRIL 15,583,500 MAY 13,683,100 JUNE 15,424,600 JULY 14,738,800 AUGUST 15,772,600 SEPTEMBER 15,042,300 OCTOBER 15,323,900 NOVEMBER 12,629,400 DECEMBER 15,152,300 TOTAL 174,375,900 B. EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions - Subsection 5.4.1(1)

There were no noncompliances with the requirements of the EPP during the reporting period.

C. Changes In Station Design or Operation, Tests, and Experiments Made In Accordance With Subsection 3.1 Which Involved A Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question.

There were no changes in station design, operation, tests or experiments conducted during the reporting period that are reportable under this subsection.

D. Nonroutine Reports Submitted In Accordance With Subsection 5.4.2 Other than those nonroutine reports identified in section III.E, there were no other nonroutine reports submitted under this subsection.

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 5 of 9 E. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit-Related Reports Relative To Matters Identified In Subsections 2.1 and 5.4.1

1. Routine monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) for all wastewater outfalls were submitted to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for each month during 2002. The following is a summary list of correspondence pertaining to DMRs and TPDES permit related documents.

MONTH l LOG NUMBER/DATE MONITORED l JANUARY TXX-02034 - 02/25/02 FEBRUARY TXX-02052 - 03/25/02 MARCH TXX-02075 - 04/25/02 APRIL TXX-02095 - 05/24/02 MAY TXX-02111 - 06/25/02 JUNE TXX-02127 - 07/25/02 TXX-02131 - 07/17/02 /"Bio-Monitoring Submission" JULY TXX-02149 - 08/23/02 AUGUST TXX-02167 - 09/25/02 SEPTEMBER TXX-02185 - 10/21/02 OCTOBER TXX-02199 - 11/20/02 NOVEMBER TXX-02212 - 12/20/02 DECEMBER TXX-03006 - 01/20/03 TXX-03013 - 01/20/03 / "Bio-Monitoring Submission"

2. There was one (1)TPDES wastewater discharge permit noncompliance in 2002. This noncompliance pertained to the release of sewage sludge to Squaw Creek Reservoir. A written report to the release was submitted to the TCEQ on June 13, 2003, (TXX-02117) and to the NRC on June 19, 2002 (TXX-02118). There was no observed environmental impact to Squaw Creek Reservoir as a result of the release of approximately 50 gallons of sludge to this water body.

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 6 of 9 TABLE 1

SUMMARY

OF GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE For 2002 PLANT WELL 1 PLANT WELL 2 NOSFWELL 1 NOSFWELL2 REC/TRAINING TOTALS NDOAYSF MONTH Total Gals. Avg. Total Gals. Avg. Total Avg. Total Gals. Avg. Total Gals. Avg. Total Gals. Avg. READINGS Gal. Gal. Gals. Gal. Gal. Gal. Gal.

.lPer__Per Min. er Min. Per M. Per Min. Per Min. l l Per M.n.

January 508,700 11.4 308,800 6.9 0 0.0 130,400 2.9 0 0.0 947,900 21.2 31 February 725,800 18.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 101,000 2.5 0 0.0 826,800 20.5 28 March 355,000 8.0 490,500 11.0 8,000 0.2 236,100 5.3 14,800 0.3 1,104,400 24.7 31 April 0 0.0 1,014,000 23.5 0 0.0 138,800 3.2 6,000 0.1 1,158,800 26.8 30 May 213,800 4.8 506,000 11.3 46,000 1.0 109,100 2.4 3,800 0.1 878,700 19.7 31 June 582,500 13.5 0 0.0 80,700 1.9 92,000 2.1 5,500 0.1 760,700 17.6 30 July 662,300 14.8 139,300 3.1 91,000 2.0 100,700 2.3 1,300 <0.1 994,600 22.3 31 August 1,000 0.0 764,400 17.1 95,900 2.1 86,900 1.9 2,800 0.1 951,000 21.3 31 September 666,500 15.4 200,900 4.7 57,900 1.3 59,100 1.4 400 <0.1 984,800 22.8 30 October 1,193,800 26.7 0 0.0 49,700 1.1 49,100 1.1 600 <0.1 1,293,200 29.0 31 November 314,100 7.3 342,800 7.9 32,700 0.8 33,100 0.8 1,100 <0.1 723,800 16.8 30 December 536,000 12.0 297,900 6.7 41,400 0.9 39,900 0.9 1,200 <0.1 916,400 20.5 31 TOTAL 5,759,500 [ 11.0 4,064,600 l 7.7 ll 503,300 l 1.0 l 1,176,200 J 2.2 37,500 [ 0.1 11,541,100

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 7 of 9 TABLE 2 2002

SUMMARY

OF GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS MONTH [DEPTH (1)

WELL OB-3 (G-3)

MSL (2)

WELL OB-4 DEPTH (1)

(G-4)

MSL (2)

January 269.7 524.1 289.8 558.1 February 268.3 525.5 285.9 561.9 March 267.8 526.0 284.9 562.9 April 268.3 525.5 283.4 564.5 May 266.6 527.2 283.1 564.8 June 265.7 528.1 283.9 563.9 July 266.6 527.2 287.2 560.7 August 269.3 524.5 291.1 556.8 September 269.1 524.7 294.5 553.4 October 269.0 524.8 295.3 552.6 November 268.8 525.0 291.7 556.2 December 267.9 525.9 287.6 560.3 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER LEVEL CHANGE FOR 2002:

Well OB-3: 269.7 ft. - 267.9 ft = (+)1.8 ft. = (+)0.5m (Increase)

Well OB-4: 289.8 ft. - 287.6 ft = (+)2.2 ft. = (+)0.7m (Increase)

NOTES:

(1) Depth to water table (ft.)

(2) Water table elevation (ft.) Mean Sea Level (MSL)

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 8 of 9 FIGURE 1

SUMMARY

OF GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE 1975 THROUGH 2002 (GPM)

Annual Groundwater Pumpage 200 "M 011 180 160 140 120

  • 100 a- 80 80 60 40 20 0

.6II.6IIII

k. IIIA~-VRe O~OAOCOO

,IIAlP0VRI9 O , lPeq-90I 010l0I01l1I1I1 li ' I AC I 01JJ e re

1. 2/8/90 - Unit #1 Operational. Discontinued using treated surface water for potable use.
2. 2/2/93 - Unit #2 Operational

Attachment to TXX-03082 Page 9 of 9 FIGURE 2 ANNUAL AVERAGE GROUNOWATER LEVEL 1980 through 2002 Mean Sea Level (MSL) 620 ,

600 580 -I 560 .1 zOB-3 540 I ,

.- W _ , s

--s OB-4 520 I 500 I 480 I I I I I I I I I I I I I9b