CPSES-200401136, Transmittal of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2003
| ML041190359 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 04/21/2004 |
| From: | Madden F TXU Generation Co, LP |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CPSES-200401136, RP-10, TXX-04076 | |
| Download: ML041190359 (58) | |
Text
A TXU
-W,44.s TXU Energy Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station P.O. Box 1002 (EO1)
Glen Rose,TX 76043 Tel: 254 897 5209 Fax: 254 897 6652 mike.blevins@txu.com Mike Blevins Senior Vice President & Principal Nuclear Officer CPSES-200401136 Log # TXX-04076 Ref. # 10CFR50 App. I RP-10 April 21, 2004 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 TRANSMITTAL OF THE ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 2003 Gentlemen:
Enclosed is one (1) copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for the CPSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. This report is submitted pursuant to Section 5.6.2 of the CPSES Unit 1 and 2 Technical Specifications (Appendix A to Operating License Nos. NPF-87 and NPF-89). The report covers the period from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and summarizes the results of measurements and analysis of data obtained from samples collected during this interval.
If there are any questions regarding this report, contact Connie Wilkerson at (254) 897-0144 or Scott Bradley at (254) 897-5495.
ga
TXX-04076 Page 2 of 2 This communication contains no new licensing basis commitments regarding CPSES Units 1 and 2.
Sincerely, TXU Generation Company LP By:
TXU Generation Management Company LLC Its General Partner Mike Blevins By:
A W7ThL-Fred W. Madden Regulatory Affairs Manager CLW/clw Enclosure c -
B. S. Mallett, Region IV w/encl.
W. D. Johnson, Region IV (clo)
M. C. Thadani, NRR (clo)
Resident Inspectors, CPSES w/encl.
TXU ENERGY COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 2003 JANUARY 1, 2003 through DECEMBER 31, 2003 TXU REVIEW and APPROVAL a
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED BY:
a~ -/ ';K "o Edwin T. Floyd Radiation Protection Technician Scott E. Bradley Health Physics Supervisor /
Date Dya//te Date
Table of Contents Section Title
- 1.
Introduction A.
Site and Station Descriltion page 5 B.
Ohjectivcs and Overview of the CPSES Radiological Environmental Nlonitoring Program page 5 I.
Program Descriptions and Results A.
Sample locations page 7 Table 1 -
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for 2003 Table 2 -
Key to Environmental Sampling Locations B.
D)irect Radiation Program page 11 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 3 -
2003 Environmental Direct Radiation Results C.
Airborne Program page 14 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 4 -
2003 Environmental Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Results Graph 1-2003 Environmental Air Sample Gross Beta Results -
Maximum and Minimum Table 5 -
2003 Environmental Air Sample lodine-131 Results Table 6 -
2003 Environmental Air Particulate Composite Gamma Isotopic Results 2
1).
Su rface VNN Ier Programnp 2
paige 20 F-Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 7 -
2003 Environmental Surface Water Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Results Graph 2-2003 Environmental Surface Water Tritium Results Surf[ace l)iilning W'ater Program page 26 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 8 -
2003 Environmental Surface Drinking Water Tritium, Gross Beta and Gamma Isotopic Results Graph 3-Squaw Creek Maximum Tritium Values Graph 4-2003 Environmental Surface Drinkin2 Water Tritium Results Graph 5-2003 Environmental Surface Drinking Water Gross Beta Results 1U.
Grountidwaer Program 1age 30 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 9-2003 Environmental Groundwater Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Results C..
Sedimenit Progr.1iil page 32 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 10 -
2003 Environmental Sediment Gamma Isotopic Results HI.
Fisi Progran page 34 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 11 -
2003 Environmental Fish Gamma Isotopic Results 3
- 1.
Food Products Program page 36 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 12 -
2003 Environmental Food Products Gamma Isotopic Results
.1.
Broadleaf Program page 38 Methods, Procedures and Result Summaries Exceptions to the Program Table 13 -
2003 Environmental Broadleaf lodine-131 and Gamma Isotopic Results K.
Conclusions page 40 1,.
Interlaioratory Comparison and Cross Check Program page 40 Appendix A Comanclie Peak Steam Electric Station Land Use Census 2003 page 44 4
I.
Introduction Results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES) for the year 2003 are contained within this report. This report covers the period from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and summarizes the results of measurements and analysis of data obtained from environmental samples collected during this same timeframe.
A.
Site and Station Description CPSES consists of two pressurized water reactor units, each designed to operate at a power level of about 1150 megawatts (electrical). The Station is located on Squaw Creek reservoir in Somervell and Hood counties, about forty miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. Unit 1 received a low power operating license February 8, 1990 and achieved initial criticality on April 3, 1990. A full power license for Unit 1 was issued on April 17, 1990 and commercial operation was declared on August 13, 1990. Unit 2 achieved initial criticality on March 24, 1993 and synchronized to the electrical grid on April 9, 1993.
B.
Objectives and Overviews of the CPSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) regulations require that nuclear power plants be designed, constructed, and operated to keep levels of radioactive material in effluents to unrestricted areas as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). To assure that these criteria are met, each license authorizing reactor operation includes technical specifications governing the release of radioactive effluents.
In-plant monitoring is used to assure that these predetermined release limits are not exceeded. However, as a precaution against unexpected and undefined processes that might allow undue accumulation of radioactivity in any sector of the environment, a program for monitoring the plant environs is also included.
Sampling locations were selected on the basis of local ecology, meteorology, physical characteristics of the region, and demographic and land use features of the site vicinity. The radiological environmental monitoring program was designed on the basis of the USNRC Branch Technical Position "An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program" on radiological environmental monitoring issued by the Radiological Assessment Branch, Revision 1 (November 1979), the CPSES Technical Specification "Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station 5
Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications" and the "CPSES Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" (ODCM).
In 2003, the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program included the following:
- The measurement of ambient gamma radiation by thermoluminescent dosimetry;
- The determination of airborne gross beta, gamma emitters, and Iodine-13 1;
- The determination of tritium and gamma emitters in surface water;
- The determination of gross beta, tritium, Iodine-131, and gamma emitters in drinking water;
- The determination of tritium and gamma emitters in ground
- water,
- The determination of gamma emitters in sediment and fish;
- The determination of gamma emitters in food products and;
- The determination of gamma emitters and Iodine-131 in broadleaf vegetation.
The regulations governing the quantities of radioactivity in reactor effluents allow nuclear power plants to contribute, at most, only a small percentage increase above normal background radioactivity. Background levels at any one location are not constant but vary with time as they are influenced by external events such as cosmic ray bombardment, weapons test fallout, and seasonal variations. These levels also can vary spatially within relatively short distances reflecting variations in geological composition. To differentiate between background radiation levels and increases resulting from operation of CPSES, the radiological surveys of the plant environs were divided into pre-operational and operational phases.
The pre-operational phase of the program provided a general characterization of the radiation levels and concentrations prevalent in these areas prior to plant operation along with an indication of the degree of natural variation to be expected. The operational phase of the program obtains data which, when considered along with the data obtained in the pre-operational phase, assists in the evaluation of the radiological impact of plant operation.
Pre-operational measurements were conducted at CPSES from 1981 to 1989. These pre-operational measurements were performed to:
- Evaluate procedures, equipment, and techniques;
- Identify potentially important pathways to be monitored after plant operation; 6
- Measure background levels and the variations along potentially important pathways and;
- Provide baseline data for statistical comparisons with future operational analytical results.
The operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is conducted to:
- Verify that measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and modeling of the environmental exposure pathways;
- Verify the effectiveness of in-plant measures used for controlling the release of radioactive materials and;
- Identify changes in the areas at and beyond the site boundary that may impact the principal pathways of exposure.
This report documents the fourteenth year of operational measurements and is submitted in accordance with the requirements of the CPSES Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Part I, Administrative Control 6.9.1.3.
Il.
Program Descriptions and Results A.
Sample locations Within a radius of twenty miles of the CPSES site there are seventy-two (72) sample locations included in the monitoring program for the year 2003. The number of sample points and the specific locations for the sample points were determined by considering locations where the highest off-site environmental concentrations have been predicted from plant effluent source terms, site hydrology, and site meteorological conditions.
Other factors considered were applicable regulations, population distribution, and ease of access to sampling stations, availability of samples at desired locations, security and future program integrity.
Additionally an annual land use census is conducted to identify changes in the areas surrounding the plant. If changes are identified that impact the principle pathways of exposure, appropriate changes to the radiological environmental monitoring program are implemented. A copy of the report "Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Land Use Census 2003" is provided in Appendix A to this report.
Table I - Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for 2003 contains a brief outline of the current program. This table specifies the sample media type, the number of locations for each media type, the sector and distance identifier 7
for each sample location, the sample frequency, the type of analysis required and the analytical frequency required.
Table 2 - Key To Environmental Sampling Locations provides a reference that links the sampling point designations used in procedures and forms to the appropriate physical sample location (sector and distance) and to the correct sample type. This cross-reference enhances the ability to review data and tie the data to the correct sample points and to ensure all samples are collected and analyzed as specified.
Currently there are no milk sample locations within ten miles of the CPSES site and there are no milk sample locations within twenty miles that will participate in the environmental program. CPSES already samples extra broadleaf locations as required due to no milk locations within the ten-mile radius therefore, no changes to the program are necessary. Milk sampling will be resumed if any future annual land use census determines a dairy has been established within the specified area.
8
Table 1 - Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for 2003 Media Number of Identification by Sampling Frequency(a)
Analysis Analytical Locations Sector and Distance (miles)
Frequency (a)
Gamma Exposure Air Particulate Air Iodine Surface Water Surface Water-drinking Ground Water Sediment Fish Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation 43 8
4 N-1.45; N-4.4; N-65; N-9.4; NNE-1.1; NNE-5.65 NE-1.7; NE-4.8; ENE-2.5; ENE-5.0; E-0.5; E-1.9 E-3.5; E-4.2; ESE-1.4; ESE-4.7; SE-1.3; SE-3.85 SE-4.6; SSE-1.3; SSE-4.4; SSE-4.5; S-1.5; S-4.2 SSW-1.1; SSW-4.4; SW-0.9; SW-4.8; SW-12.3 WSW-1.0; WSW-5.35; WSW-7.0; W-1.0; W-2.0 W-5.5; WNW-1.0; WNW-5.0; WNW-6.7; NW-1.0 NW-5.7; NW-9.9; NNW-1.35; NNW-4.6 N-9.4; E-3.5; SSE-4.5; SW-12.3; NW-1.0; N-1.45 SWIWSW-0.95; SISSW-1.2 N-19.3; ESE-1.4; N-1.5; NE-7.4 0, A W
M(b)
M(c) 0 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Gross Beta Gamma Isotopic Filter Gamma Isotopic Charcoal Gamma Isotopic Tritium Gross Beta Gamma Isotopic lodine-131 Tritium Gamma Isotopic Tritium Gamma Isotopic Gamma Isotopic Gamma Isotopic Iodine-131 Gamma Isotopic Q A W
QC W
M QC M
M M
QC Q
Q SA SA MH MH M
2 NNW-0.1; N-9.9 5
4 2
I SSE-4.6; W-1.2; WSW-0.1; N-9.8; N-1.45 N-9.9; NNE-1.0; NE-7.4; SE-5.3 NNE-8.0; ENE-2.0 ENE-9.0 SA SA MH 3
N-1.45; SW-1.0; SW-13.5 M
(a) Frequency codes are:
W - Weekly M - Monthly 0 - Quarterly QC - Quarterly Composite MH - Monthly at Harvest SA - Semiannual A - Annual (b) Surface water samples from Squaw Creek are monthly composites of weekly grab samples. Surface water samples from Lake Granbury are monthly grab samples.
(c) Surface water - drinking samples are a monthly composite of weekly grab samples.
Table 2 Key To Environmental Sampling Locations SAMPLING LOCATION SAMPLE SAMPLING LOCATION SAMPLE POINT (SECTOR-MILE)
TYPE*
POINT (SECTOR-MILE)
TYPE*
Al A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 N-1.45 N-9.4 E-3.5 SSE-4.5 S/SSWV-1.2 SW-123 SWIWSW-0.95 NW-1.0 A
A A
A.
A A
A A
Ri R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 RIO R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22 R23 R24 R25 R26 R27 N-1.45 N-4.4 N-6.5 N-9.4 NNE-1.1 NNE-5.65 NE-1.7 NE-4.8 ENE-2.5 ENE-5.0 E-0.5 E-1.9 E-3.5 E-4.2 ESE-1.4 ESE-4.7 SE-13 SE-3.85 SE-4.6 SSE-13 SSE-4A SSE-4.5 S-1.5 S-4.2 SSWV-1.1 SSW-4A SW-0.9 R28 R29 R30 R31 R32 R33 R34 R35 R36 R37 R38 R39 R40 R41 R42 R43 SWi SW2 SW3 SW4 SW5 SW6 GWI GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 F1 F2 FPI BLI BL2 BL3 SW-4.8 SW-12.3 WSWV-1.0 WSWV-5.35 WSWV-7.0
- V-1.0 WV-2.0
"'-5.5 WNW-1.0 WNW-5.0 WVNW-6.7 NW-1.0 NW-5.7 NW-9.9 NNW-1.35 NNW-4.6 N-1.5 N-9.9 N-19.9 NE-7.4 ESE-1.4 NNW-0.1 W-1.2 WSW-o.i SSE-4.6 N-9.8 N-1.45 NNE-i.0 N-9.9 NE-7A SE-5.3 ENE-2.0 NNE-8.0 ENE-9.0 N-1.45 SW-1.0 SW-13.5 R
R R
R R
R R
R R
R R
R R
R R
R SW SWV/DW SW SW SW SWIDW GW/DW GW/DW GW/DW GW/DW GW/DW SS SS SS SS F
F FP BL BL BL Sample A
Type*
- AIR SAMPLE
- DIRECT RADIATION
- SURFACE WATER
- DRINKING WVATER GW - GROUNDWATER F - FISH S S - SHORELINE SEDIMENT FP - FOOD PRODUCT BL - BROADLEAF VEGETATION
B.
Direct Radiation Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to determine the direct (ambient) radiation levels at the designated monitoring locations. The monitoring locations were chosen according to the criteria given in the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiation Monitoring (Revision 1, November 1979). The area around the station was divided into 16 radial sectors of 22-1/2 degrees each, corresponding to the cardinal points of the compass. TLDs were placed in each of these sectors. The thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed in two rings around the station.
An inner ring was located as close as possible to the site boundary and an outer ring was located at a distance of 4 to 6 miles from the station. Eleven additional TLDs were located at points of special interest, including two control locations. For routine direct radiation measurements, two sets of the Panasonic CaSO4:Dy TLDs were used at each of the 43 monitoring locations. One set of TLDs was exchanged on a quarterly basis and a second set of TLDs was exchanged on a yearly basis. Additional sets of in-transit TLD's were used as control TLDs for the quarterly and annual TLDs.
The thermoluminescent dosimeters were processed on-site by CPSES National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Certified dosimetry personnel. Individual dosimeters were calibrated by exposure to an accurately known radiation field from a certified Cs-137 source. The year 2001 was the first year that CPSES used the Panasonic TLD System to supply all the required direct radiation (ambient) monitoring. Dosimetry data for the year 2003 provided consistent results in support of the year 2001 dosimetry results previously obtained with the onsite dosimetry processing system.
D. C. Oakley's report "National Radiation Exposure in the United States",
published in 1972, calculated a background radiation dose rate equivalent of 0.22 mr/day for the area surrounding Fort Worth, Texas. This calculated value varies widely with changes in location but represents an appropriate reference value to compare with actual measured TLD doses.
Using data from the pre-operational program for the two years prior to the startup of Unit 1, the quarterly TLDs averaged a calculated dose rate of 0.14 mr/day while the yearly TLDs averaged a calculated dose rate of 0.16 mr/day. The range of measured values from this same two-year period varied from a minimum of 0.11 mr/day to a maximum of 0.22 mr/day.
Table 3 - 2003 Environmental Direct Radiation Results contains the measured dose (mr) for each quarterly TLD from each of the 43 monitoring locations. The corresponding quarterly calculated dose rate (mr/day) values are listed as well. The statistical average doses (mr) and 11
dose rate (mr/day) values for each set of quarterly TLDs is also displayed.
Additionally, the table includes the total dose (mr) of all four quarters for each specific location. The table also includes the measured dose (mr) for each annual TLD from each of the 43 monitoring locations. The corresponding annual calculated dose rate (mr/day) values are listed as well. The statistical annual average dose (mr) for the entire set of annual TLDs is reported along with the average dose rate (mr/day) for the entire set of annual TLDs.
For the year 2003, the statistical average dose rate of all the quarterly TLD's was 0.077 mr/day. The quarterly measured dose rates ranged from a minimum of 0.0049 mr/day to a maximum of 0.2383 mr/day. The statistical average dose rate of all the annual TLDs was 0.0634 mr/day.
The annual measured dose rates ranged from a minimum of 0.0184 mr/day to a maximum of 0.1518 mr/day. There was good agreement between the sum of the measured doses of the individual quarterly TLDs and the measured dose of the annual TLDs. The summation of the individual quarterly measured doses averaged 28.19 mr for all the forty -three monitoring stations while the annual measured dose averaged 23.15 mr for all the monitoring stations.
Comparing the pre-operational data and operational data collected through the year 2003 did not produce any anomalies. The direct radiation dose data for 2003 was consistently lower than previous years of data during both the pre-operational program and the previous years of the operational program. The implementation of the Panasonic TLD system and the algorithms used to process the data from these new type TLDs accounts for the lower values as well as different type holders for the TLD's. An expanded study into background TLD's is also being conducted to confirm 2003 data variations.
During the year 2003, there were exceptions to the Direct Radiation Program. All quarterly and annual TLDs were placed into the field at their proper locations and on the appropriate frequency. Collection of all TLDs occurred as specified with the exception of TLD's at locations R-6 and R-26 being stolen.. No abnormal quarterly results were obtained by either CPSES or by the State of Texas, Bureau of Radiation Control.
12
Table 3 - 2003 Environmental Direct Radiation Results (Units of mr dose and mrlday dose rate) 1ST QTR Average 2ND QTR Average 3RD QTR Average 4TH QTR Average QTR Location Total mrlday Total mrlday Total mrlday Total mrlday Total N1.A5 2.90 0.0322 3.55 0.0390 4.85 0.0527 11.20 0.1191 22.50 N-4.4 7.40 0.0822 6.85 0.0753 9.15 0.0995 14.45 0.1537 37.85 N-6.5 6.40 0.0711 4.65 0.0511 6.00 0.0652 17.00 0.1809 34.05 N-9.4 6.10 0.0678 4.20 0.0462 4.45 0.0484 4.85 0.0516 19.60 NNE-1.1 3.90 0.0429 4.50 0.0495 4.70 0.0511 15.25 0.1622 28.35 NNE-5.65 6.50 0.0722 5.70 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 NE-1.7 3.00 0.0330 3.45 0.0379 3.10 0.0337 9.35 0.0995 18.90 NE.4.8 6.30 0.0700 4.55 0.0500 6.10 0.0663 21.40 0.2277 38.35 ENE-2.5 8.90 0.0989 7.15 0.0786 6.30 0.0685 13.85 0.1473 36.20 ENE-5.0 9.30 0.1033 9.30 0.1022 10.70 0.1163 16.85 0.1793 46.15 E-0.5 7.00 0.0778 5.80 0.0637 6.40 0.0696 12.05 0.1282 31.25 E-1.9 3.10 0.0344 3.00 0.0330 2.65 0.0288 14.75 0.1569 23.50 E-3.5 8.70 0.0967 7.50 0.0824 8.70 0.0946 22.05 0.2346 46.95 E-4.2 7.50 0.0833 6.35 0.0698 7.20 0.0783 16.75 0.1782 37.80 ESE-1.4 4.00 0.0444 3.95 0.0434 4.65 0.0505 14.70 0.1564 27.30 ESE-4.7 7.30 0.0811 6.25 0.0687 7.90 0.0859 16.20 0.1723 37.65 SE-1.3 7.00 0.0778 5.60 0.0615 7.35 0.0799 22.40 0.2383 42.35 SE-3.85 4.00 0.0444 4.15 0.0456 4.90 0.0533 11.50 0.1223 24.55 SE-4.6 4.70 0.0522 5.65 0.0621 5.35 0.0582 11.65 0.1239 27.35 SSE-1.3 4.00 0.0444 4.10 0.0451 5.10 0.0554 11.65 0.1239 24.85 SSE-4.4 5.80 0.0644 5.60 0.0615 5.50 0.0598 10.90 0.1160 27.80 SSE-4.5 4.80 0.0533 5.10 0.0560 4.80 0.0522 10.85 0.1154 25.55 51.5 2.80 0.0311 3.50 0.0385 3.70 0.0402 10.75 0.1144 20.75 S-4.2 3.90 0.0433 4.45 0.0489 5.45 0.0592 11.10 0.1181 24.90 SSW-1.1 4.60 0.0511 4.05 0.0445 4.40 0.0478 8.55 0.0910 21.60 SSW-4.8 0.0000 4.10 0.0451 4.45 0.0484 9.95 0.1059 SW-0.9 2.00 0.0222 4.25 0.0467 4.95 0.0538 7.25 0.0771 18.45 SW-4.8 2.60 0.0289 3.85 0.0423 4.30 0.0467 8.85 0.0941 19.60 SW-I 2.3 Control 5.00 0.0556 4.60 0.0505 5.15 0.0560 13.50 0.1436 28.25 WSW-1.0 4.80 0.0533 4.70 0.0516 5.30 0.0576 15.20 0.1617 30.00 WSW-5.35 5.10 0.0567 3.95 0.0434 4.75 0.0516 15.45 0.1644 29.25 WSW-7.0 Control 5.50 0.0611 4.20 0.0462 5.60 0.0609 14.80 0.1574 30.10 W-1.0 3.80 0.0422 2.80 0.0308 2.80 0.0304 8.10 0.0862 17.50 W-2.0 2.30 0.0256 2.40 0.0264 2.60 0.0283 9.45 0.1005 16.75 W.5.5 3.90 0.0433 3.80 0.0418 3.95 0.0429 10.60 0.1128 22.25 WNW.1.0 4.10 0.0456 4.95 0.0544 5.65 0.0614 13.00 0.1383 27.70 WNW-5.0 6.00 0.0667 5.75 0.0632 5.05 0.0549 8.75 0.0931 25.55 WNW-6.7 5.60 0.0622 3.40 0.0374 4.50 0.0489 10.45 0.1112 23.95 NW-1.0 4.60 0.0511 3.65 0.0401 4.30 0.0467 17.45 0.1856 30.00 NW.5.7 4.90 0.0544 4.80 0.0527 5.45 0.0592 12.20 0.1298 27.35 NW.9.9 4.90 0.0544 3.95 0.0434 2.95 0.0321 18.10 0.1926 29.90 NNW-1.35 1.40 0.0154 0.45 0.0049 1.00 0.0109 11.40 0.1213 14.25 NNW-4.6 6.90 0.0767 6.10 0.0670 7.65 0.0832 18.20 0.1936 38.85 Annual Average Total mrlday 19.60 0.0537 32.30 0.0885 24.15 0.0662 26.10 0.0715 19.05 0.0519 0.0000 18.25 0.0497 24.10 0.0660 30.30 0.0830 41.90 0.1148 26.15 0.0716 10.20 0.0279 55.40 0.1518 29.15 0.0799 20.55 0.0563 28.35 0.0777 29.45 0.0807 19.75 0.0541 21.85 0.0599 18.25 0.0500 25.15 0.0689 21.50 0.0589 16.60 0.0455 21.10 0.0578 17.30 0.0474 0.0000 18.50 0.0507 20.85 0.0568 24.10 0.0660 22.45 0.0615 23.05 0.0632 26.65 0.0730 13.40 0.0367 13.70 0.0375 18.00 0.0493 25.60 0.0701 23.45 0.0642 23.65 0.0648 21.35 0.0585 23.45 0.0642 17.35 0.0475 6.70 0.0184 30.40 0.0833 AVERAGES 5.08 0.0564 4.67 0.0513 5.23 0.0569 13.16 0.1400 28.19 23.15 0.0634
C.
Airborne Program Air particulate and air iodine samples were collected each week from the eight monitoring locations described in Table 1 - Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Radiological Monitoring Program for 2003. Each air particulate sample was collected by drawing air through a 47millimeter-diameter glass-fiber filter. Air iodine was collected by drawing air through a TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge which was connected in series behind the air particulate filter. Shipped to an independent laboratory, air particulate filters were analyzed weekly for gross beta activity and were composited quarterly for gamma spectrometry analysis.
Charcoal cartridges were analyzed weekly for Iodine-131.
For the year 2003, a total of 415 air particulate filters were collected and analyzed for gross beta activity. The reported gross beta activity ranged from a minimum value of 7.80E-03 pCi/m3 to a maximum value of 8.93E-02 pCi/m3. Table 4 - 2003 Environmental Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Results contains the reported values of all samples. There were no anomalies noted in the data reported for 2003 when compared to pre-operational and previous operational data. Graph 1 - 2003 Environmental Air Sample Gross Beta Results - Maximum and Minimum trends the weekly high and low gross beta values to show the seasonal variation of the results as well as providing indication of consistency between the individual monitoring locations.
A total of 416 charcoal cartridges were analyzed for airborne Iodine-131.
No Iodine-131 was detected at any of the eight monitoring locations.
Table 5 - 2003 Environmental Air Sample Iodine-1 31 Results contains the reported values of each Iodine-131 analysis, all of which are less than the required lower limit of detection (LLD).
All air particulate filters were collected and composited quarterly and then analyzed by gamma spectrometry. The gamma isotopic data is presented in Table 6 - 2003 Environmental Air Particulate Composite Gamma Isotopic Results. Typical of pre-operational and previous operational data results, the only radioactive nuclide identified in all the samples was cosmogenic Beryllium-7, a naturally occurring isotope.
During the year 2003, there were exceptions to the Airborne Program.
The monthly sample collection run for January 25, 2003 was not performed until January 27, 2003 due to inclement weather conditions on highways.
14
The air particulate sample at station SSE-4.5 was invalid due to improper loading of filter on February 18, 2003. No data was collected and the cause of improper loading could not be determined.
On September 1, 2003, the contract laboratory did not meet the required LLD for station SSE-4.5. The analysis was determined to be valid due to results being consistent with normal gross beta results.
A review of all the State of Texas air sample data indicated no anomalies.
15
Table 4 -- 2003 Environmental Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Results (Units of pCi/m3)
Location N-1.4 N-9.4 E-3.5 SSE-4.5 SISSW -1.2 SW-I 2.3 Date Control Control 11712003 2.94E-02 3.60E-02 4.60E-02 4.69E-02 3.96E-02 3.88E-02 111412003 2.30E-02 3.37E-02 4.19E-02 3.87E-02 3.64E-02 3.33E-02 112112003 3.89E-02 4.48E-02 5.72E-02 5.10E-02 4.12E-02 4.23E-02 1128/2003 5.93E-02 6.76E-02 8.93E-02 7.47E-02 5.98E-02 6.60E-02 2/412003 3.59E-02 4.90E-02 6.76E-02 6.72E-02 4.47E-02 4.98E-02 211112003 2.33E-02 3.07E-02 3.68E-02 3.25E-02 2.92E-02 2.71E-02 2118/2003 2.65E-02 3.16E-02 4.60E-02 2.83E-02 3.23E-02 2/2712003 2.72E-02 3.12E-02 4.22E-02 3.47E-02 2.70E-02 1.84E-02 3/412003 3.05E-02 3.98E-02 4.55E-02 4.09E-02 3.19E-02 4.09E-02 3/1112003 3.66E-02 4.69E-02 6.44E-02 6.27E-02 4.25E-02 4.99E-02 3118/2003 2.64E-02 2.84E-02 3.91E-02 4.15E-02 2.66E-02 3.11E-02 3125/2003 2.59E-02 2.74E-02 3.48E-02 2.87E-02 2.16E-03 2.71E-02 41112003 2.03E-02 2.90E-02 3.64E-02 3.28E-02 2.09E-02 2.90E-02 41812003 1.59E-02 1.88E-02 3.06E-02 2.59E-02 1.73E-02 2.35E-02 411512003 2.44E-02 2.61E-02 3.51E-02 3.56E-02 2.10E-02 2.54E-02 4/22/2003 2.35E-02 2.52E-02 3.75E-02 3.61 E-02 2.45E-02 2.80E-02 412912003 2.06E-02 2.72E-02 2.97E-02 2.94E-02 2.06E-02 2.44E-02 51612003 3.01 E-02 3.42E-02 4.54E-02 3.91 E-02 3.06E-02 3.43E-02 511312002 2.72E-02 3.20E-02 4.62E-02 4.29E-02 2.82E-02 3.20E-02 5120/2003 2.38E-02 2.61 E-02 3.71 E-02 3.60E-02 2.66E-02 2.84E-02 5127/2003 2.31E-02 2.78E-02 3.48E-02 3.14E-02 2.23E-02 2.53E-02 6/3/2003 3.42E-02 3.65E-02 4.61 E-02 4.33E-02 3.22E-02 3.55E-02 6/10/2003 1.94E-02 2.08E-02 2.94E-02 2.54E-02 2.09E-02 2.16E-02 6/16/2003 1.33E-02 1.68E-02 2.14E-02 2.17E-02 1.14E-02 1.51E-02 6124/2003 1.83E-02 2.04E-02 2.63E-02 2.69E-02 2.10E-02 2.12E-02 7/112003 2.45E-02 2.59E-02 3.29E-02 3.02E-02 2.21 E-02 2.39E-02 718/2003 2.02E-02 1.69E-02 2.99E-02 2.56E-02 1.88E-02 2.58E-02 7115/2003 1.49E-02 1.85E-02 2.44E-02 2.36E-02 1.84E-02 1.83E-02 7/22/2003 2.23E-02 2.10E-02 3.19E-02 2.84E-02 2.01E-02 2.19E-02 712912003 2.30E-02 2.49E-02 3.52E-02 3.36E-02 2.60E-02 2.78E-02 8/512003 2.11E-02 2.61E-02 3.63E-02 3.13E-02 2.05E-02 2.52E-02 8/12/2003 3.75E-02 3.36E-02 4.91E-02 3.71E-02 3.24E-02 3.47E-02 811912003 3.51 E-02 1.88E-02 3.25E-02 2.27E-02 1.85E-02 2.28E-02 812612003 1.56E-02 1.57E-02 2.37E-02 2.32E-02 2.02E-02 2.43E-02 9/112003 1.49E-02 1.77E-02 1.81E-02 1.82E-02 2.07E-02 1.48E-02 91912003 2.71E-02 2.89E-02 4.65E-02 4.02E-02 2.93E-02 3.42E-02 9/16/2003 2.06E-02 2.14E-02 3.00E-02 3.21E-02 2.50E-02 3.04E-02 9/2312003 3.55E-02 3.82E-02 5.31E-02 4.73E-02 3.84E-02 4.04E-02 9/3012003 3.65E-02 3.47E-02 5.26E-02 4.47E-02 4.01 E-02 4.31 E-02 10/7/2003 7.80E-03 2.71 E-02 4.70E-02 3.57E-02 2.99E-02 3.38E-02 10/1412003 2.15E-02 2.01E-02 3.57E-02 2.63E-02 2.01E-02 2.41E-02 10/2112003 3.25E-02 2.89E-02 4.76E-02 4.51E-02 3.26E-02 3.45E-02 10/28/2003 3.53E-02 3.29E-02 5.58E-02 4.67E-02 3.69E-02 4.25E-02 111412003 2.45E-02 2.90E-02 3.98E-02 3.85E-02 3.03E-02 3.01 E-02 11/111/2003 3.89E-02 3.37E-02 6.06E-02 4.90E-02 3.93E-02 4.52E-02 11/18/2003 1.88E-02 2.05E-02 3.443-02 2.89E-02 2.36E-02 2.85E-02 11/25/2003 2.86E-02 2.84E-02 2.92E-02 4.46E-02 3.08E-02 3.24E-02 1212/2003 3.44E-02 3.88E-02 4.18E-02 3.94E-02 3.45E-02 4.58E-02 12/9/2003 4.41 E-02 4.75E-02 5.04E-02 4.90E-02 5.23E-02 4.92E-02 12116/2003 3.76E-02 3.69E-02 3.78E-02 3.88E-02 4.15E-02 3.55E-02 12/23/2003 3.28E-02 3.25E-02 3.73E-02 3.51E-02 4.14E-02 3.34E-02 12/30/2003 3.18E-02 2.73E-02 3.41E-02 2.99E-02 3.51 E-02 3.24E-02 swISW -0.95 NW-1.0 3.37E-02 3.24E-02 4.28E-02 5.98E-02 4.93E-02 2.59E-02 2.52E-02 3.01 E-02 3.21 E-02 4.58E-02 2.89E-02 2.48E-02 2.38E-02 1.86E-02 2.60E-02 2.49E-02 2.1 OE-02 3.14E-02 3.17E-02 2.63E-02 2.82E-02 3.16E-02 1.82E-02 1.56E-02 1.98E-02 2.49E-02 2.24E-02 2.00E-02 2.22E-02 3.16E-02 2.66E-02 4.44E-02 2.28E-02 2.13E-02 1.18E-02 3.12E-02 2.79E-02 4.09E-02 3.90E-02 3.29E-02 2.39E-02 3.41 E-02 3.91 E-02 3.30E-02 3.68E-02 2.40E-02 3.06E-02 4.21 E-02 4.34E-02 3.97E-02 3.00E-02 3.49E-02 3.55E-02 3.29E-02 5.20E-02 6.81 E-02 5.78E-02 3.10E-02 3.07E-02 2.87E-02 4.25E-02 5.35E-02 2.88E-02 2.37E-02 2.36E-02 2.28E-02 2.75E-02 2.66E-02 2.34E-02 3.19E-02 2.83E-02 2.87E-02 2.41 E-02 3.62E-02 2.17E-02 1.58E-02 2.33E-02 2.32E-02 2.02E-02 1.84E-02 1.99E-02 2.82E-02 2.62E-02 3.20E-02 2.09E-02 1.84E-02 1.15E-02 2.81 E-02 2.22E-02 3.14E-02 3.49E-02 2.80E-02 2.41 E-02 2.78E-02 3.34E-02 2.83E-02 3.79E-02 2.12E-02 2.81 E-02 3.08E-02 3.85E-02 3.15E-02 2.81 E-02 2.55E-02 Required LLD's 1.OOE-02
coa
Table 5 -- 2003 Environmental Air Sample lodine-131 Results (Units of pClIm3)
N-1.45 N-9.4 E-3.5 SSE-4.5 SISSW-1.2 SW-12.3 SWIWSW-0.95 NW-1.0 Date Control Control 117/2003
<4.7e-2
<4.8e-2
<4.5e-2
<4.8e-2
<4.3e-2
<5.2e-2
<5.le-2
<5.2e-2 1/1412003
<3.4e-2
<3.7e-2
<3.3e-2
<3.1e-2
<4.1e-2 c4.8e-2
<3.9e-2
<4.5e-2 1/21/2003
<4.6e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.6e-2
<4.2e-2
<4.6e-2
<5.4e-2
<4.6e-2 1/28/2003
<5.0e-2
<5.7e-2
<5.2e-2
<5.0e-2
<4.4e-2
<4.1 e-2
<6.0e-2
<6.5e-2 2/4/2003 c4.3e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.6e-2
<3.7e-2
<4.7e-2
<3.9e-2
<4.2e-2
<4.9e-2 2/11/2003
<5.7e-2
<5.4e-2
<5.2e-2
<2.6e-2
<5.5e-2
<5.1e-2
<4.6e-2
<5.1e-2 2/18/2003
<3.2e-2
<2.8e-2
<2.7e-2
<3.1 e-2
<3.0e-2
<2.6e-2
<2.7e-2
<2.7e-2 2/27/2003
<4.0e-2
<3.8e-2
<3.7e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.9e-2
<6.5e-2
<4.3e-2
<3.8e-2 3/412003
<4.7e-2
<4.0e-2
<4.0e-2
<4.6e-2
<4.3e-2
<5.5e-2
<4.9e-2
<3.7e-2 3111/2003
<3.2e-2
<3.0e-2
<3.1e-2
<3.0e-2
<3.0e-2
<2.9e-2
<2.2e-2
<2.7e-2 3/18/2003
<2.5e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.4e-2
<2.8e-2
<3.0e-2
<2.6e-2
<3.0e-2
<1.9e-2 3/25/2003
<4.4e-2
<4.1 e-2
<4.7e-2
<4.0e-2
<5.0e-2
<4.2e-2
<4.7e-2
<4.6e-2 4/1/2003
<3.6e-2
<2.7e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.1e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.2e-2
<2.5e-2
<3.5e-2 4/8/2003
<3.5e-2
<3.1e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.3e-2
<2.8e-2
<2.8e-2
<2.7e-2 4115/2003
<2.6e-2
<3.1 e-2
<3.6e-2
<3.1 e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.1 e-2
<3.0e-2
<2.6e-2 4122/2003
<2.9e-2
<2.9e-2
<2.7e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.1 e-2 4129/2003
<3.2e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.1e-2
<2.8e-2
<3.3e-2
<2.8e-2
<3.le-2
<3.2e-2 5/6/2003
<3.2e-2
<2.7e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.le-2
<2.7e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.2e-2
<2.9e-2 5113/2003
<3.5e-2
<3.2e-2
<4.4e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.8e-2
<4.4e-2
<4.1e-2
<5.0e-2 512012003
<2.9e-2
<1.4e-2
<3.1e-2
<2.1e-2
<2.0e-2
<3.1e-2
<2.0e-2
<3.7e-2 5/27/2003
<4.4e-2
<4.4e-2
<4.3e-2
<3.7e-2
<4.4e-2
<4.1 e-2
<4.3e-2
<4.4e-2 613/2003
<2.8e-2
<2.4e-2
<2.7e-2
<3.5e-2
<2.7e-2
<2.8e-2
<2.6e-2
<2.6e-2 6110/2003
<2.8e-2
<2.6e-2
<4.5e-2
<4.3e-2
<2.8e-2
<3.3e-2
<2.8e-2
<3.0e-2 611612003
<3.le-2
<3.4e-2
<2.7e-2
<3.1e-2
<3.9e-2
<3.7e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.7e-2 612412003
<4.0e-2
<4.6e-2
<3.9e-2
<4.4e-2
<3.9e-2
<3.7e-2
<4.4e-2
<4.5e-2 71112003
<2.8e-2
<2.5e-2
<2.8e-2 c2.7e-2
<2.4e-2
<3.1e-2
<3.le-2
<2.7e-2 7/8/2003
<2.2e-2
<3.0e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.0e-2
<2.2e-2
<3.5e-2
<2.7e-2
<3.0e-2 7/15/2003
<2.5e-2
<2.8e-2
<3.4e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.0e-2
<4.0e-2
<3.9e-2
<3.3e-2 7/22/2003
<3.Oe-2
<3.0e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.5e-2
<2.8e-2
<2.6e-2
<2.5e-2
<3.5e-2 7/29/2003
<3.2e-2
<3.0e-2
<2.8e-2
<3.3e-2
<3.3e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.3e-2
<3.le-2 8/512003
<3.6e-2
<3.1e-2
<4.5e-2
<3.8e-2
<5.0e-2
<4.6e-2
<4.8e-2
<4.1e-2 8/12/2003
<3.2e-2
<2.9e-2
<2.5e-2
<2.7e-2
<2.6e-2
<2.7e-2
<2.4e-2
<2.8e-2 8/19/2003
<2.8e-2
<3.0e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.3e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.3e-2
<3.5e-2 812612003
<3.le-2
<3.7e-2
<3.6e-2
<3.3e-2
<3.1e-2
<3.0e-2
<3.le-2
<3.0e-2 91112003
<3.5e-2
<4.0e-2
<4.le-2
<3.8e-2
<4.1e-2
<3.6e-2
<4.0e-2
<3.6e-2 91912003
<4.5e-2
<5.3e-2
<3.2e-2
<4.1e-2
<4.1e-2
<4.6e-2
<4.5e-2
<4.1e-2 9116/2003
<3.9e-2
<4.2e-2
<4.4e-2
<3.3e-2
<4.3e-2
<5.0e-2
<5.2e-2
<4.1e-2 9123/2003
<2.7e-2
<3.9e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.1 e-2
<3.8e-2
<3.4e-2 c4.5e-2 c3.9e-2 9130/2003
<5.2e-2
<6.0e-2
<6.6e-2
<6.2e-2
<4.8e-2
<5.6e-2
<5.2e-2
<4.5e-2 1017/2003
<3.9e-2
<4.1e-2
<3.2e-2
<4.6e-2
<4.1e-2
<3.6e-2
<3.6e-2
<3.8e-2 10/14/2003
<2.9e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.6e-2 c3.4e-2
<3.9e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.8e-2 10/21/2003
<3.0e-2
<4.8e-2
<3.5e-2
<2.7e-2
<4.0e-2
<4.5e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.6e-2 10/28/2003
<2.1e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.5e-2
<3.2e-2
<3.4e-2
<3.5e-2
<2.5e-2
<3.le-2 11/4/2003
<4.1e-2
<2.9e-2
<3.6e-2
<3.1e-2
<3.2e-2 c4.0e-2
<4.2e-2
<3.4e-2 11/11/2003
<4.8e-2
<2.7e-2
<4.6e-2
<4.0e-2
<4.8e-2
<2.8e-2
<4.5e-2
<4.9e-2 11/18/2003
<5.2e-2
<4.8e-2
<5.4e-2
<4.8e-2 c3.6e-2
<4.7e-2
<3.6e-2
<4.3e-2 11/25/2003
<4.7e-2
<5.2e-2
<5.0e-2
<4.3e-2
<5.1e-2
<4.4e-2
<4.5e-2
<4.7e-2 12/2/2003
<4.1e-2
<4.1e-2
<4.4e-2
<4.1e-2
<4.7e-2
<4.6e-2
<3.2e-2
<4.8e-2 12/9/2003
<5.3e-2
<3.8e-2
<4.9e-2
<4.5e-2
<3.5e-2
<4.2e-2
<4.5e-2
<4.4e-2 12/16/2003
<4.8e-2
<5.0e-2
<3.3e-2
<4.4e-2 c4.5e-2
<4.2e-2
<4.7e-2
<4.1e-2 12/23/2003
<4.6e-2
<4.9e-2 c4.2e-2
<5.7e-2
<5.0e-2
<5.3e-2
<5.4e-2
<6.1e-2 12/30/2003
<4.0e-2
<4.6e-2
<4.3e-2
<5.0e-2
<4.7e-2
<3.8e-2
<3.7e-2
<3.8e-2 Required LLD 7.OOE-02
Table 6 -- 2003 Environmental Air Particulate Composite Gamma Isotopic Results Composite Dates 1ST OTR 01107103- 03125103 2ND QTR 03/25103- 06124103 3RD QTR 06124103-9130103 4TH QTR 10128103-12130103 Nuclides Be-7 K40 Mn-54 Co-57 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-CO Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-57 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-57 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-CO Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-57 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-6O Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Location N-1.4 9.00E-02
<2.7e-02
<3.0e-03
<1.4e-03
<4.0e-03
<2.5e-02
<3.1 e-03
<8.Oe-03
<9.6e-03
<1.0e-02
<2.3e-03
<2.3e-03
<1.8e-01
<2.1e-01 7.90E-02
<3.3e-02
<3.1 e-03
<1.6e-03
<4.3e-03
<1.7e-02
<2.7e-03
<8.7e-03
<9.6e-03
<1.2e-02
<3.2e-03
<1.7e-03
<1.9e-01
<2.2e-01 1.23E-01
<4.3e-02
<3.9e-03
<1.5e-03
<5.1 e-03
<1.9e-02
<4.9e-03
<1.2e-02
<1.2e-02
<1.e-02
<3.6e-03
<6.0e-03
<7.0e-02
<8.1e-02 1.1 OE-01
<2.8e-02
<2.8e-03
<1.3e-03
<4.2e-03
<1.2e-02
<2.7e-03
<6.0e-03
<9.6e-03
<7.7e-03
<2.6e-03
<22e-03
<2.9e-02
<3.3e-02 (Units of pCi/m3)
E-3.5 SSE4.5 SSW-1.2 SW-12.3 ;wmwsw-o.e NW-1.0 N-9.4 Control 9.40E-02
<4.0e-02
<3.4e-03
<1.4e-03
<4.0e-03
<3.0e-02
<3.1 e-03
<6.1 e-03
<8.9e-03
<6.6e-03
<3.3e-03
<2.3e-03
<1.7e-01
<1.9e-01 1.51 E-01
<4.3e-02
<3.3e-03
<1.5e-03
<5.2e-03
<1.7e-02
<7.4e-04
<7.6e-03
<1.Oe-02
<1.1e-02
<2.2e-03
<2.3e-03
<2.5e-01
<2.9e-01 1.16E-01
<5.2e-02
<3.9e-03
<1.9e-03
<6.8e-03
<2.1 e-02
<4.9e-03
<9.4e-03
<8.2e-03
<1.le-02
<3.9e-03
<4.0e-03
<6.3e-02
<7.2e-02 5.20E-02
<3.le-02
<3.0e-03
<1.4e-03
<2.6e-03
<2.1e-02
<2.7e-03
<6.0e-03
<8.4e-03
<1.3e-02
<2.1e-03
<2.6e-03
<9.8e-02
<1.Ie-01 1.31 E-01
<2.9e-02
<3.4e-03
<1.7e-03
<6.1e-03
<3.2e-02
<2.2e-03
<5.6e-03
<1.1e-02
<1.3e-02
<2.3e-03
<2.4e-03
<1.4e-01
<1.6e-01 1.85E-01
<3.0e-02
<3.1e-03
<1.4e-03
<6.2e-03
<1.7e-02
<2.7e-03
<8.7e-03
<1.3e-02
<1.2e-02
<2.6e-03
<2.3e-03
<1.5e-01
<1.8e-01 8.80E-02
<5.3e-02
<4.0e-03
<1.9e-03
<6.9e-03
<2.2e-02
<3.9e-03
<1.2e-02
<8.9e-03
<9.3e-03
<5.0e-03
<6.0e-03
<4.7e-02
<5.4e-02 1.08E-01
<4.0e-02
<2.8e-03
<1.4e-03
<3.3e-03
<3.6e-03
<7.3e-04
<8.4e-03
<8.4e-03
<9.3e-03
<2.1e-03
<2.0e-03
<9.8e-02
<1.le-01 I1.37E-01
<1.3e-02
<1.1e-03
<3.4e-04
<1.7e-03
<6.9e-03
<1.2e-03
<2.5e-03
<4.le-03
<5.6e-03
<1.1 e-03
<1.1e-03
<8.7e-02
<1.Oe-01 I1.47E-01
<3.5e-02
<2.6e-03
<1.5e-03
<5.2e-03
<1.7e-02
<3.1le-03
<8.2e-03
<9.6e-03
<1.4e-02
<2.8e-03
<2.3e-03
<2.3e-01
<2.6e-01 I1.33E-01
<4.9e-02
<4.5e-03
<1.6e-03
<8.2e-03
<1.5e-02
<5.2e-03
<1.le-02
<1.3e-02
<1.2e-02
<4.Ie-03
<6.2e-03
<A.e-02
<8.5e-02 6.902-02
<3.6e-02
<2.8e-03
<1.4e-03
<4.2e-03
<1.7e-02
<3.le-03
<8.0e-03
<7.7e-03
<1.2e-02
<2.8e-03
<2.0e-03
<9.9e-02
<I.1e-01 4.70E-02
<2.7e-02
<3.2e-03
<1.5e-03
<4.8e-03
<2.5e-02
<7.3e-04
<8.6e-03
<1.3e-02
<1.3e-02
<3.4e-03 c2.7e-03
<1.3e-01
<1.5e-01 1.23E-01
<4.0e-02
<2.6e-03
<1.7e-03
<5.2e-03
<1.9e-02
<2.7e-03
<5.4e-03
<1.1e-02
<1.3e-02
<2.2e-03
<2.3e-03 c2.8e-01
<3.2e-01 1.66E-01
<5.2e-02
<3.3e-03
<1.9e-03
<7.5e-03
<1.2e-02
<5.3e-03
<1.1e-02
<1.Oe-02
<8.6e-03
<3.3e-03
<5.7e-03
<9.8e-02
<1.1e-01 1.39E-01
<2.8e-02
<2.0e-03
<1.5e-03
<4.6e-03
<1.6e-02
<2.7e-03
<6.0e-03
<8.4e-03
<1.2e-02
<3.3e-03
<2.6e-03
<2.9e-02
<3.3e-02 Control 1.03E-01
<5.8e-02
<4.3e-03
<1.8e-03
<6.3e-03
<1.9e-02
<5.6e-03
<1.Oe-02
<1.4e-02
<1.9e-02
<4.0e-03
<5.8e-03
<2.4e-01
<2.7e-01 1.22E-01
<3.5e-02
<4.1 e-03
<1.4e-03
<3.7e-03
<1.7e-02
<2.1 e-03
<7.7e-03
<1.Oe-02
<9.1 e-03
<3.3e-03
<2.3e-03
<1.5e-01
<1.8e-01 1.23E-01 c2.9e-02
<2.6e-03
<1.le-03
<3.5e-03
<9.9e-03
<2.5e-03
<4.3e-03
<6.3e-03
<7.5e-03
<2.2e-03
<2.1e-03
<3.0e-02
<3.5e-02 1.28E-01
<3.8e-02
<2.8e-03
<1.2e-03
<5.5e-03
<2.1 e-02
<2.7e-03
<1.le-02
<8.4e-03
<9.9e-03
<1.9e-03
<2.8e-03
<9.9e-02
<1.1e-01 6.80E-02
<5.8e-02
<3.7e-03
<1.9e-03
<6.9e-03
<2.5e-02
<3.0e-03
<8.5e-03
<1.Oe-02
<1.4e-02
<5.1 e-03
<5.5e-03
<2.0e-01
<2.2e-01 9.1OE-02
<3.3e-02
<3.5e-03
<1.5e-03
<3.0e-03
<1.7e-02
<2.7e-03
<7.0e-03
<9.6e-03
<1.1e-02
<2.4e-03
<2.5e-03
<2.3e-01
<2.6e-01 1.22E-01
<4.3e-02
<3.3e-03
<1.6e-03
<7.2e-03
<1.6e-02
<4.5e-03
<1.Oe-02
<9.2e-03
<1.3e-02
<3.3e-03
<5.7e-03
<5.5e-02
<6.3e-02 1.71 E-01
<3.9e-02
<2.8e-03
<1.4e-03
<4.7e-03
<1.3e-02
<2.8e-03
<6.2e-03
<8.6e-03
<1.1e-02
<3.0e-03
<3.le-03
<1.3e-01
<1.5e-01 7.70E-02
<6.7e-02
<3.9e-03
<1.9e-03
<6.3e-03
<1.9e-02
<5.3e-03
<8.5e-03
<1.2e-02
<1.3e-02
<4.2e-03
<6.6e-03
<1.3e-01
<1.5e-01 1.02E-01
<3.3e-02
<2.4e-03
<1.6e-03
<5.9e-03
<1.5e-02
<2.7e-03
<8.2e-03
<1.Oe-02
<1.4e-02
<2.6e-03
<2.8e-03
<1.6e-01
<1.8e-01 1.16E-01
<2.5e-02
<2.7e-03
<1.2e-03
<3.2e-03
<1.1e-02
<2.1e-03
<4.7e-03
<6.6e-03
<7.1 e-03
<1.7e-03
<2.4e-03
<4.6e-02
<5.3e-02 5.30E-02
<3.8e-02
<4.1e-03
<1.6e-03
<9.1 e-03
<1.2e-02
<4.8e-03
<1.2e-02
<9.8e-03
<1.1e-02
<4.7e-03
<5.4e-03
<2.2e-01
<2.5e-01 Required LLD 5.0e-2 Required LLD 6.0e-2 Required LLD 5.0e-2 Required LLD 6.0e-2 Required LLD 5.0e-2 Required LLD 6.0e-2 Required LLD 5.0e-2 Required LLD 6.0e-2
D.
Surface Water Program Surface water monitoring stations are found at four locations as detailed in Table 1 - Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Location N-1.5 provides samples representative of Squaw Creek reservoir surface water at a location beyond significant influence of the plant discharge. Location ESE-1.4 provides samples representative of discharges from Squaw Creek reservoir downstream to Squaw Creek and to Lake Granbury via an installed return line. [NOTE: The installed return line to Lake Granbury has never been used to send water back to Lake Granbury.] Location NE-7.4 provides samples of Lake Granbury surface water downstream of the discharge from the return line from Squaw Creek reservoir. A control sample is obtained from the Brazos River, upstream of Lake Granbury at location N-19.3. Surface water samples from Squaw Creek reservoir locations were collected weekly and composited for monthly gamma isotopic analysis.
Samples from Lake Granbury locations were collected monthly and analyzed by gamma spectrometry. All surface water samples were also composited quarterly by location for tritium analysis.
For the year 2003, all surface water samples were collected as required.
Table 7 -- 2003 Environmental Surface Water Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Results contains the reported values. Forty-eight samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry. All results for the required radionuclides were reported as less than the required LLDs. Sixteen quarterly composited samples were analyzed for tritium. The results of the reported tritium values for Squaw Creek reservoir were in line with expected concentrations. The tritium values ranged from a high of 1.33e+04 pCi/l to a low of l.Ole+04 pCi/l. The results from Lake Granbury were all less than the required LLDs as expected. The tritium concentration reported in Squaw Creek is well below the action level of 3.0e+4 pCi/l and is following the expected concentration variations based on fuel cycles, power histories and reservoir makeup due to rain and pump transfers from Lake Granbury. Graph 2 - 2003 Environmental Surface Water Tritium Results indicates the current results and the short-term trend of the tritium concentration in Squaw Creek reservoir. The tritium value varies only slightly and is leveling off which possibly indicates that equilibrium may have been reached or soon will be reached. Graph 3 -
Squaw Creek Maximum Tritium Values trends the reservoir tritium concentration since it was first detected in 1990 after Unit 1 startup. This long-term graph also indicates that equilibrium concentrations may have been obtained. Squaw Creek reservoir tritium is a direct product of the operation of CPSES and is the only consistent indicator detectable in the environment surrounding Comanche Peak. There should not be any significant changes in the tritium concentrations in the near future and no action levels are anticipated. A review of pre-operational and operational 20
data indicated the 2003 results were both expected and consistent with previous data and that no anomalies had occurred.
For the year 2003, there were no exceptions to the Surface Water Program.
21
Table 7 -- 2003 Environmental Surface Water Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCifl) page 1 of 2 Date Location 1/28/2003 N-1.5 2127t2003 N-1.5 312512003 N-1.5 4/2912003 N-1.5 5127/2003 N-1.5 6t2412003 N-1.5 7/29/2003 N-1.5 8/26/2003 N-1.5 913012003 N-1.5 1012812003 N-1.5 11/25/2003 N-1.5 1213012003 N-1.5 H-3 NuclTides Be-7
<1.3e+O1
<1.oe+01 1.08E+04 <2.4e+01
<1.5e+O1
<2.2e+01 1.01E+04 <3.5e+01
<1.5e+Ol
<1.1e+01 1.33E+04 <2.9e+01
<3.le+01
<1.3e+O1 1.27E+04 <1.2e+O1 K.40
<2.le+01 1.08E+01
<3.5+01
<2.5e+01
<3.ge+Ol
<5.4e+0l 1.36E+01 9.80E.00 2.40E+01 2.50E+01
<2.2e.01
<2.0e+Ol Mn-54
<1.2e+00
<1.2e+00
<2.4e+00
<1.6e+00
<2.3e+00
<3.2e+00
<1.5e+00
<1.2e+00
<3.0e+00
<3.le+00
<9.7e-01
<1.1e+00 Co-58
<1.4e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.6e+00
<1.7+00
<2.2e+00
<4.1e+O0
<1.7e+00
<1.2e+00
<3.3e+00
<3.1e+00
<1.6e+00
<1.5e+00 Fe-59
<3.2e+00
<2.ge+00
<5.9e+00
<3.9+00
<5.1le+00
<9.le+00
<4.le+00
<3.3e+00
<9.8e+00
<1.1e+01
<3.9e+00
<4.le+00 Co-60
<1.4e+00
<1.2e+00
<2.5e+00
<1.7e+00
<2.1 e+00
<4.7e+00
<1.8e+00
<1.2e+00
<3.6e+00
<3.5e+00
<1.2e+00
<1.2e+00 Zn-65
<2.7e+00
<3.5e+00
<6.3e+00
<3.8e+00
<5.0e+00
<7.8e+00
<3.5e+00
<2.7e+00
<8.0e+00
<7.9e+00
<2.5e+00
<4.le+00 Zr-95
<2.8e+00
<2.3e+00
<4.3e+00
<2.9e+00
<3.9e+00
<7.1 e+00
<3.0e+00
<2.3e+00
<5.6e+00
<5.9e+00
<2.3e+00
<2.5e+00 Nb-95
<1.9e+00
<1.7e+00
<3.2e+00
<1.9e+00
<3.5e+00
<4.5e+00
<2.1e+00
<1.7e+00
<4.0e+00
<4.1e+00
<1.7e+00
<1.4e+00 1-131
<9.7e+00
<5.2e+00
<1.1e+01
<8.2e+00
<7.6e+00
<1.4e+01
<9.3e+00
<5.7e+00
<9.6e+00
<1.1e+01
<1.2e+01
<1.2e+01 Cs-134
<1.4e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.5e+00
<1.8e+00
<2.6e+00
<3.8e+00
<1.7e+00
<1.3e+00
<3.7e+00
<3.1e+00
<1.2e+00
<1.2e+00 Cs-137
<1.3e+00
<1.2e+00
<2.2e+00
<1.6e+00 c2.4e+00
<3.3e+00
<1.8e+00
<1.1e+00
<3.0e+00
<3.3e+00
<1.2e+00
<1.le+00 Ba-140
<4.9e+00
<3.4e+00
<7.8e+O0
<4.8e+O0
<5.4e+O0
<I.Oe+Ol
<5.7e+00
<3.3e+O0
<9.7e+O0
<6.8e+O0
<5.2e+O0
<5.3e+00 La-140
<5.6e+00
<3.9e+00
<8.9e+00
<5.5e+00
<6.2e+00
<1.2e+01
<6.5e+00
<3.8e+00
<1.le+O1
<7.8e+00
<6.0e+00
<6.1 e+00 1/2812003 212712003 3/2512003 4/2912003 5/27/2003 612412003 7/29/2003 812612003 9/30/2003 10/28/2003 11/25/2003 12/30/2003 N-I19.3 N-19.3 N-19.3 N.1 9.3 N-19.3 N-1 9.3 N.19.3 N-19.3 N-19.3 N.1 9.3 N.19.3 N-1 9.3
<2.0e+0l
<4.0e+O1
<I.2e+03 <4.3e+01
<3.9e+01
<2.4e+0l
<1.3e+03 <3.9e+01
<3.7e+01
<5.4e+01
<1.2e+03 <3.7e+O1
<3.3e+01
<2.8e+01
<9.5e+02 <3.4e.-01
<3.3e+01
<7.4e+01
<6.8e+O1 3.40E+01
<3.6e+01
<5.2e+01 4.90E+01
<9.5e+01
<4.4e+01
<4.3e+01
<6.6e+01
<6.9e+0l
<2.0e+00 <2.3e+00
<4.4e+00 <4.1le+00
<3.ge+00
<4.4e+00
<2.7e+00
<5.0e+O0
<4.5e+00
<7.9e+00
<4.6e+O0
<2.6e+00
<3.7e+00
<4.2e+00
<4.4e+00
<6.8e+00
<2.5e+00
<4.8e+00
<5.1e+00
<6.0e+00
<4.4e+00
<3.2e+00
<3.8e+00
<5.0e+00
<4.le+O0
<1.2e+01
<1.le+01
<1.1e+01
<5.9e+00
<7.6e+00
<8.7e+00
<2.2e+01
<1.5e+01
<8.0e+00
<1.le+Ol
<1.1e+01
<1.6e+00
<5.5e+00
<4.2e+00
<5.9e+00
<3.0e+00
<4.0e+00
<4.1e+00
<4.4e+00
<4.3e+00
<3.3e+00
<4.3e+00
<3.4e+00
<4.4e+00
<9.5e+00
<1.le+01
<1.8e+O1
<7.0e+00
<1.0e+01
<9.6e+00
<1.7e+01
<9.5e+00
<7.8e+00
<8.3e+00
<1.Oe+01
<4.2e+00
<8.7e+00
<8.0e+00
<9.2e+O0
<5.4e+00
<5.9e+00
<9.8e+00
<1.4e+01
<6.4e+00
<5.8e+00
<6.6e+00
<8.6e+00
<2.2e+00
<5.5e+00
<5.6e+00
<6.2e+OO
<3.5e+00
<3.7e+00
<5.3e+00
<7.9e+00
<4.5e+00
<4.1e+00
<4.3e+00
<5.5e+00
<7.le+00
<8.4e+00
<7.5e+00
<1.Oe+01
<5.6e+00
<8.0e+00
<6.5e+00
<9.4e+00
<7.9e+00
<6.7e+00
<8.4e+00
<1.2e+01
<2.2e+00
<4.7e+00
<4.9e+00
<6.1e+00
<3.3e+00
<4.9e+00
<5.0e+00
<7.3e+00
<3.7e+00
<3.8e+00
<3.9e+00
<4.le+00
<2.7e+00
<5.2e+00
<4.7e+00
<4.6e+00
<3.0e+00
<4.1e+00
<4.0e+00
<7.1e+00
<4.4e+00
<3.1e+00
<3.2e+00
<3.5e+00
<4.8e+00
<7.8e+00
<1.1e+01
<1.3e+01
<4.8e+00
<7.4e+00
<6.8e+00
<1.3e+01
<6.2e+00
<5.3e+00
<7.9e+00
<1.0e+01
<5.5e+00
<9.Oe+00
<1.2e+01
<1.4e+01
<5.5e+00
<8.5e+00
<7.8e+00
<1.5e+01
<7.1e+00
<6.1e+00
<9.1e+00
<1.2e+01 Required LLD's 3.00E+03 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 3.OOE+01 1.50E+01 3.00E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.80E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 Reportable Level 3.OOE+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 4.00E+02 3.00E+02 3.OOE+02 4.00E+02 4.OOE+02 2.OOE+01 3.OOE+01 5.00E+01 2.OOE+02 2.OOE+02
Table 7 -- 2003 Environmental Surface Water Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCifl) page 2of2 Date Location 1128/2003 NE-7.4 2/2712003 NE-7.4 3/25/2003 NE-7.4 4/29/2003 NE-7.4 5/27/2003 NE-7.4 6124/2003 NE-7.4 7/29/2003 NE-7.4 8/26/2003 NE-7.4 9/30/2003 NE-7.4 10/28)2003 NE-7.4 11/25/2003 NE-7.4 12/30/2003 NE-7.4 H-3 Nuclides Be-7
<2.Oe+01
<3.4e+01
<1.2e+03 <3.Ie+01
<3.8e+01
<4.2e+01
<1.3e+03 <3.2e+01
<5.2e+01
<4.3e+01
<1.2e+03 <2.8e+01
<3.0e+01
<2.5e+01
<I.Oe+03 <3.7e+01 K-40
<3.Ie+01.
<7.le+01
<4.3e+01
<5.ge+01
<6.4e+01
<c5.5e+01
<6.8e+01
<1.Oe+02
<4.6e+01
<4.8e+01
<c6.8e+0l
<5.6e+01 Mn-54
<2.3e+00
<4.5e+00
<3.le+00
<4.4e+00
<4.7e+00
<3.7e+00
<6.3e+00
<8.2e+00
<3.le+00
<3.8e+00
'c3.le+00
<4.3e+00 Co-58
<2.5e+00
<5.7e+00
<3.1 e+00
<4.3e+00
<4.1le+00
<4.Ie+00
<5.7e+00
<7.1 e+00
<3.8e+00
<3.5e+00
<3.3e+00
<4.6e+00 Fe-59
<4.ge+00
<1.2e+01
<6.5e+00
<7.8e+00
<1.0e+01
<7.7e+00
<1.le+01
<2.4e+01
<9.4e+00
<1.1e+01
<1.Oe+01
<1.5e+01 Co.60
<2.9e+00
<6.8e+00
<2.8e+00
<6.7e+00
<5.1 e+00
<5.3e+00
<6.1 e+O0
<8.4e+00
<2.9e+00
<3.6e+00
<3.2e+00
<4.2e+00 Zn-65
<5.6e+00
<1.3e+01
<7.6e+00
<1.3e+01
<1.1e+01
<8.le+00
<3.0e+01
<1.9e+01
<9.6e+00
<8.2e+00
<9.6e+00
<1.1e+01 Zr-95
<4.le+00
<7.7e+00
<5.0e+00
<8.0e+00
<9.8e+00
<6.4e+00
<9.le+00
<1.4e+01
<5.4e+00
<6.0e+00
<6.3e+00
<8.4e+00 Nb.95
<2.4e+00
<5.1 e+00
<3.7e+00
<5.4e+00
<5.0e+00
<4.5e+00
<8.6e+00
<7.4e+00
<4.0e+00
<4.6e+00
<3.9e+00
<4.9e+00 1-131
<7.7e+O0
<1.Oe+01
<6.6e+00
<9.0e+00
<8.0e+00
<7.4e+00
<8.5e+00
<1.Oe+01
<6.0e+00
<6.9e+00
<9.5e+00
<1.3e+01 Cs-134
<2.2e+00
<5.3+00
<3.9e-00
<4.3e+00
<5.7e+00
<4.7e+00
<5.ge+00
<7.6e+O0
<3.7e+00
<3.7e+00
<3.1le+00
<4.9e+00 Cs-I137
<2.5e+00
<6.le+00
<3.1 e+00
<4.2e.00
<3.8e+00
<3.8e+00
<5.7e+00
<6.2e+00
<3.0e+00
<3.le+00
<2.9e+00
<4.0e+00 Ba-140
<5.2e+00
<8.8e+00
<5.0e+00
<8.0e+00
<9.5e+00
<5.7e+00
<1.2e+01
<1.3e+01
<5.3e+00
<4.7e+00
<8.6e+00
<8.2e+00 La-140
<6.0e+00
<1.0e+01
<5.8e+00
<9.2e+00
<1.1e+01
<6.6e+00
<1.3e+01
<1.4e+01
<6.1e+00
<5.3e+00
<9.9e+00
<9.4e+00 1/28/2003 2/27/2003 3/25/2003 4/29/2003 5/27/2003 6/24/2003 7/29/2003 8/26/2003 9/30/2003 10/28/2003 11/25/2003 12/30/2003 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4 ESE-1.4
<1.5e+01
<1.2e+01 1.02E+04 <2.6e+01
<1.8e+01
<1.8e+01 1.05E+04 <3.1e+01
<1.7e+01
<1.2e+01 1.22E+04 <2.2e+01
<2.6e+01
<1.2e+01 1.23E+04 <1.4e+01 1.61E+01 3.03E+01 3.70E+01
<3.4e+01
<3.1e+01 2.20E+01 2.85E+01 1.76E+01
<3.6e+01
<5.1e+01
<2.0e+01
<1.8e+01
<1.5e+00 <1.5e+00
<1.2e+00 <1.3e+00
<2.3e+00
<1.9e+00
<2.le+00
<3.0e+00
<1.8e+00
<1.2e+00
<2.3e+00
<4.2e+00
<1.2e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.6e+00
<2.1e+00
<2.1e+00
<3.7e+00
<2.0e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.8e+00
<4.0e+00
<1.5e+00
<1.4e+00
<3.6e+O0
<3.0e+00
<5.8e+00
<5.4e+00
<4.9e+00
<7.7e+00
<4.2e+00
<3.4e+00
<7.0e+00
<8.0e.00
<4.4e+00
<3.9e+00
<1.4e+00
<1.2e+00
<2.4e+00
<2.5e+00
<2.3e+00
<2.8e+00
<1.9e+00
<1.1e+00
<2.2e+00
<3.8e+00
<1.3e+00
<1.2e+00
<5.2e+00
<4.2e+00
<4.9e+00
<5.0e+00
<5.0e+00
<6.9e+00
<4.0e+00
<2.9e+00
<9.4e+00
<6.8e+00
<3.9e+00
<4.7e+00
<2.8e+00
<2.4e+00
<5.0e+00
<3.8e+00
<3.5e+00
<6.5e+00
<3.4e+00
<2.2e+00
<4.7e+00
<6.7e+00
<2.5e+00
<2.6e+00
<2.0e+00
<1.6e+00
<3.le+00
<2.6e+00
<2.6e+00
<3.9e+00
<2.7e+00
<1.5e+00 c3.3e+00
<4.5e+00
<2.1e+00
<2.8e+00
<1.le+01
<5.3e+00
<1.Oe+01
<8.3e+00
<7.7e+00
<1.4e+01
<8.4e+00
<5.5e+00
<1.1e+01
<9.1 e+00
<1.2e+01
<1.2e+01
<1.3e+00
<1.4e+00
<2.3e+00
<2.0e+00
<2.1e+00
<3.6e+00
<1.8e+0O
<1.3e+00
<2.5e+00
<4.4e+00
<1.3e+00
<1.3e+00
<1.5e+00
<1.1e+00
<2.4e+00
<2.2e+00
<2.1 e+00
<3.7e+00
<1.6e+00
<1.le+00
<2.3e+00
<2.9e+00
<1.1e+00
<1.2e+00
<5.3e+00
<3.3e+00
<5.8e+00
<5.4e+00
<5.2e+00
<7.5e+00
<5.2e+00
<3.2e+00
<6.7e+O0
<8.0e+00
<4.9e+00
<5.2e+00
<6.1 e+00
<3.8e+00
<6.6e+00
<6.2e+0O
<6.0e+00
<8.7e+00
<6.0e+00
<3.6e+00
<7.7e+00
<9.3e+00
<5.7e+00
<6.0e+00 Required LLD's 3.OOE+03 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 3.OOE+01 1.50E+01 3.OOE+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.80E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 Reportable Level 3.OOE+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 4.OOE+02 3.00E+02 3.OOE+02 4.OOE+02 4.OOE+02 2.OOE+01 3.OOE+01 5.00E+01 2.00E+02 2.002+02
Graph 2 -- 2003 Environmental Surface Water Tritium Results 14000 12000 0
U) 4-or 10000 8000 6000 4000 N-19.3
-u-N-1.5 NE-7.4
-- ESE-1.4 2000 0
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Dec-03 Monthly/Composite Sample Dates C-Oz.
E.
Sutrface Drinking WlSater Program Surface drinking water was collected at two monitoring locations. Table 1
-- Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for 2003 details the location and types of analysis required. Samples of water from Squaw Creek reservoir were collected at the monitoring location NNW-0.1 and analyzed at detection levels required for drinking water standards even though the water is not allowed to be used as potable water. Monitoring location N-9.9 was used as a surface drinking water location based on the proximity of the City of Granbury intake to the Granbury potable water system. All surface drinking water samples were collected weekly and then composited for Iodine-131 analysis, gamma isotopic analysis, and gross beta analysis on a monthly basis. Tritium analysis was performed on a quarterly basis.
For the year 2003, all samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. The results are reported in Table 8 - Environmental Surface Drinking Water Tritium. Gross Beta and Gamma Isotopic Results.
There were no gamma emitting radionuclides identified in any of the twenty-four composite samples. Tritium reported in Squaw Creek reservoir ranged from 1.01e+04 pCi/I to 1.28e+04 pCi/I and averaged 1.14e+04 pCi/I. Tritium reported from all Lake Granbury water samples indicated less than the required LLD as expected. Graph 4 - 2003 Environmental Surface Drinking Water Tritium Results trends the results reported for the year 2003. Gross Beta results at the indicator location NNW-0.1 ranged from 2.08e+01 pCill to 3.30e+01 pCi/I with an average of 2.57e+01 pCi/I. Gross Beta results at the control location N-9.9 ranged from 1.08e+01 pCiI to 1.87e+01 pCi/i with an average of 1.40e+01 pCi/I. Graph 5 - 2003 Environmental Surface Drinking Water Gross Beta Results trends the gross beta results for the two monitor locations and indicates a potential influence from Comanche Peak in the levels detected in the two different bodies of water. Past gross beta results for Lake Granbury have been as high as 83 pCi/I and therefore this yearly trend does not positively indicate a clear influence from the operation of Comanche Peak. This will be watched for the next few sample periods till a positive inference can be made. The gross beta results received are within values previously reported and there is no reportable level for gross beta so no action is required at this time.
For the year 2003 there were no exceptions to the Surface Drinking Water Program.
26
Table 8 -- 2003 Environmental Surface Drinking Water Tritium, Gross Beta and Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCiUI)
Date 1/28/2003 2/27/2003 3/26/2003 4/29/2003 5/27/2003 6/24/2003 7/29/2003 8/26/2003 9/30/2003 10/28/2003 11/25/2003 12/3012003 Location N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 N-9.9 H-3 Gross Beta 1.29E+01 1.40E+01
<1.2e+03 1.29E+01 1.21 E+01 1.33E+01
<1.3e+03 1.25E+01 1.68E+01 1.87E+01
<1.3e+03 1.08E+01 1.79E+01 8.40E+00
<1.Oe+03 1.73E+01 Nucildes Mn-54 Co-58
<1.7e+00 <1.8e+00
<1.6e+0O <2.0e+00
<4.le+00 <3.9e+00 c3.7e+00 <4.3e+00
<4.4e+00 <4.8e+00 c4.2e+00
<4.3e+00
<3.7e+00
<3.0e+00
<3.7e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.9e+00 c4.6e+00
<4.2e+00
<4.0e+00
<3.8e+00
<4.4e+00
<1.8e+00
<3.5e+00 Fe-59
<4.5e+00
<4.3e+00
<8.6e+00
<8.6e+00
<8.5e+00
<1.Oe+01
<9.4e+00
<1.6e+01
<9.3e+00
<1.2e+01
<4.7e+00
<1.Oe+Ol Co-60
<1.6e+00
<2.0e+00
<4.6e+00
<5.5e+00
<4.3e+00
<3.8e+00
<4.2e+00
<3.5e+00
<2.9e+00
<4.7e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.9e+00 Zn-65
<3.9e+00
<3.7e+00
<8.0e+00
<7.2e+00
<1.2e+01
<1.1e+01
<9.1e+00
<1.3e+01
<6.0e+00
<1.1e+01
<3.9e+00
<1.3e+0l Zr-95
<3.2e+00
<3.4e+00
<6.5e+00
<7.1e+00
<6.7e+00
,<6.7e+00
<7.6e+00
<8.2e+00
<5.4e+00
<8.7e+00
<3.0e+00
<6.8e+00 Nb-95
<2.4e+00
<2.3e+00
<4.6e+00
<4.9e+00
<5.7e+00
<5.6e+00
<6.1e+00
<6.2e+00
<3.5e+00
<6.2e+00
<2.7e+00
<6.8e+00 1-131
<9.2e-01
<5.7e-01
<3.3e-01 c4.6e-01
<5.0e-01
<4.le-01
<5.7e-01
<8.2e-01
<8.5e-01
<7.6e-01
<9.1e-01 c8.8e-01 Cs-134 Cs-137
<2.0e+00 <1.7e+00
<1.7e+00 <1.5e+00
<3.7e+00 <4.le+00
<3.2e+00 <3.9e+00
<4.9e+00 <4.5e+00
<5.le+00 <4.7e+00
<4.le+00 <3.7e+00
<4.le+00 <3.5e+00
<3.0e+00 <2.4e+00
<4.7e+00 <5.6e+00
<1.4e+00 <1.3e+00
<3.4e+00 <2.8e+O0 Ba-140
<7.1e+00
<4.8e+00 c1.le+01
<1.1e+01
<1.1e+01
<1.2e+01
<1.3e+01
<1.le+01
<9.5e+00
<1.3e+01
<7.9e+00
<1.3e+01 La-140
<8.1e+00
<5.5e+00
<1.3e+01
<1.3e+01
<1.2e+0I
<1.4e+01
<1.5e+01
<1.3e+O1
<1.1e+01
<1.5e+O1
<9.1 e+00
<1.5e+01 1/28/2003 2/27/2003 3/26/2003 4/29/2003 5/27/2003 6/24/2003 7/29/2003 8/26/2003 9/30/2003 10/28/2003 11/25/2003 12/30/2003 NNW-0.1 2.08E+01 NNW-0.1 2.34E+01 NNW-0.1 1.06E+04 2.26E+01 NNW-0.1 2.30E+01 NNW-0.1 2.61E+01 NNW-0.1 1.01E+04 2.98E+01 NNW-0.1 2.55E+O1 NNW-0.1 2.97E+01 NNW-0.1 1.28E+04 3.01E+01 NNW-0.1 2.33E+01 NNW-0.1 2.12E+01 NNW-0.1 1.21E+04 3.30E+01
<1.9e+00
<1.5e+00
<2.8e+00
<2.3e+00
<3.8e+00
<3.6e+00
<4.2e+00
<4.5e+00
<3.0e+00
<3.2e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.5e+00
<2.0e+00
<1.7e+00
<3.8e+00
<2.6e+00
<4.3e+00
<4.0e+00
<3.9e+00
<6.2e+00
<3.7e+00
<3.6e+00
<1.6e+00 c3.Oe+00
<5.4e+00 <2.0e+00
<4.0e+00 <2.1e+00
<9.3e+00 <3.0e+00
<4.3e+00 <3.4e+00
<4.2e+00 <3.3e+00
<8.6e+00 <7.0e+00
<6.1e+00
<8.8e+00
<8.4e+00
<1.Oe+O1
<1.4e+01 c1.2e+O1
<1.Oe+01
<4.9e+00
<8.6e+00
<1.9e+00
<3.2e+00
<3.7e+00
<4.3e+00
<4.2e+00
<4.2e+00
<3.0e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.7e+0W
<9.Oe+0W
<1.6e+01
<9.1e+00
<9.1e+O0
<1.4e+01
<7.5e+00
<7.7e+00
<3.le+00
<8.4e+00
<4.3e+00
<8.6e+00
<8.2e+00
<8.0e+00
<9.9e+00
<6.8e+00
<6.5e+0W
<2.6e+00
<2.0e+00
<5.1e+00
<4.8e+00
<5.0e+00
<5.4e+00
<6.9e+00
<6.2e+00
<4.6e+0W
<3.8e+00
<7.6e-01
<5.3e-01
<3.2e-01
<5.e-01
<4.7e-01
<3.9e-01
<6.8e-01
<8.6e-01
<8.4e-01
<7.0e-01
<1.8e+00
<1.7e+00
<4.Oe+00
<2.2e+00
<3.8e+00
<3.3e+00
<4.6e+00
<5.2e+00
<3.5e+00
<4.0e+00
<1.3e+00
<2.4e+00
<1.8e+00
<1.7e+00
<3.4e+00
<2.2e+00
<3.2e+00
<4.0e+00
<4.le+00
<5.Oe+00
<3.5e+00
<3.2e+00
<7.5e+00
<4.8e+00
<1.2e+0I
<6.5e+00
<1.0e+01
<1.Oe+01
<1.1e+01
<1.3e+01
<1.1e+01
<6.2e+00
<8.6e+O0
<5.6e+00
<1.3e+0I
<7.5e+00
<1.2e+01
<1.2e+01
<1.3e+O1
<1.4e+01
<1.2e+01
<7.1e+00
<2.8e+00 <2.3e+00 <8.6e-01
<5.le+00 <4.le+00 <9.2e-01
<1.4e+00 <8.3e+00 <9.6+00
<2.4e+00 <1.2e+01 <1.4e+01 Required LLD's 2.OOE+03 4.OOE+00 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 3.OOE+01 1.50E+01 3.OOE+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.OOE+00 1.50E+01 1.80E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 Reportble Level 2.00E+04 None 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 4.00E+02 3.OOE+02 3.OOE+02 4.OOE+02 4.OOE+02 2.OOE+00 3.OOE+01 5.00E+01 2.00E+02 2.OOE+02
Graph 3 -- Squaw Creek Maximum Tritium Values 30000 25000 0
0 1W-20000 15000 10000 I --
3maxmum 5000 0
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I Kv R0 Yearly Maximum
Graph 4 -- 2003 Environmental Surface Drinking Water Tritium Results 1.40E+04 1.20E+04
%-0 0,&
E_
1.OOE+04 -
8.OOE+03 -
6.OOE+03 -
4.OOE+03 -
-iN-9.9
--N NW-0. 1 2.OOE+03 O.OOE+00 Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Dec-03 Composite Sample Dates 0
a3r
Graph 5 -- 2003 Environmental Surface Drinking Water Gross Beta Results 4-0 01) 4-i 3.50E+O1 3.OOE+O1 2.50E+O1 2.OOE+O1 1.50E+O1 1.OOE+O1 5.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO
- 4.
1
- 1 l-- N-9.9
-l-NNW-0.I1 I
II I
I I
I I
I I
Monthly Data Points
F.
Ground Water Program Table 1 - Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for 2003 specifies the five groundwater monitoring locations. Groundwater supplies in the site area are not affected by plant effluents and are sampled only to provide confirmation that groundwater is not affected by plant discharges.
Groundwater samples were collected quarterly and analyzed for gamma isotopes and tritium at each location.
For the year 2003, a total of twenty groundwater samples were collected from the five different monitoring locations. There were no radionuclides identified in any of the samples. All required LLDs were met for each required gamma emitting radionuclide. Tritium analysis was performed on twenty samples, all indicated less than the required LLD. Results for all the groundwater analyses are reported in Table 9 -- 2003 Environmental Groundwater Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Results. These results confirm that plant discharges are having no effect on groundwater in the area surrounding Comanche Peak.
For the year 2003, there were no exceptions to the Ground Water Program.
30
Table 9 -
2003 Environmental Groundwater Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCill)
Nuclldes H-3 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Date 3/25/2003 6/24/2003 9/30/2003 12/30/2003 Location W-1.2 W-1.2 W-1.2 W-1.2
<1.3e+03
<1.2e+03
<1.3e+03 c1.Oe+03
<5.4e+00 <5.9e+00 <1.0e+O1
<7.5e+00 <7.6e+00 <1.6e+01
<3.74e+00 <4.5e+00 <1.4e+0i
<3.7e+00
<4.2e+00 <1.3e+O1
<6.2e+00 <1.1e+01 <9.4e+00 <5.8e+00 <I.Oe+O1 c7.4e+00 <2.2e+O1 ci.3e+O1 <8.8e+00 <9.3e+00
<5.3e+00 <1.2e+O1
<6.3e+00 <4.6e+00 <5.7e+00
<5.1e+00 <8.3e+00 <8.le+00 <5.7e+00 <9.3e+00
<5.3e+00 <4.6e+00 <8.7e+00
<7.8e+00 <8.8e+00 <1.Oe+01
<4.3e+00 <5.0e+00 <8.5e+00
<4.4e+00 <3.9e+00 <9.6e+00
<l.Oe+01
<1.2e+01
<9.8e+00
<1.1e+01 3125/2003 WSW-0.1 6/24/2003 WSW.0.1 9/30/2003 WSW-0.1 12/30/2003 WSW-0.1 3/25/2003 SSE-4.6 6/24/2003 SSE-4.6 9/30/2003 SSE-4.6 12/30/2003 SSE-4.6
<1.4e+03
<1.2e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.4e+03 c1.2e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.2e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.2e+03
<1.3e+03
<1.3e+03
<3.0e+00 c4.7e+00
<5.3e+00
<3.4e+00
<3.3e+00
<5.3e+00
<4.le+00
<3.7e+00
<4.2e+00
<5.9e+00 c5.1e+00
<3.8e+00
<3.6e+00
<5.5e+00
<3.8e+00
<4.2e+00
<3.8e+00 <7.6e+00
<6.oe+00 <1.5e+01
<6.4e+00 <1.4e+O1
<4.5e+00 <1.4e+O0
<2.9e+00 <6.5e+00
<6.6e+00 <1.2e+O1
<3.8e+00 <1.2e+O1
<4.8e+00 <8.le+00
<4.5e+00 <8.8e+00
<5.2e+00 <1.2e+O1
<4.7e+00 <1.5e+01
<5.0e+00 <9.4e+00
<3.4e+00 <7.3e+00
<6.5e+00 <1.6e+01
<3.5e+00 <8.3e+00
<4.0e+00 <1.3e+O1
<3.7e+00 <8.7e+00 <6.8e+00 <4.4e+00 <7.0e+00
<7.7e+00 <1.2e+O1
<7.9e+00 <5.le+00 <8.5e+00
<5.9e+00 <1.4e+O1
<7.9e+00 <6.6e+00 <8.le+00 c4.3e+00 <1.1e+01 <5.7e+00 <5.1e+00 <1.3e+O0
<3.9e+00 <7.0e+00 <6.6e+00 <3.7e+00 <6.3e+00
<6.8e+00 <1.6e+O1
<8.7e+00 <7.5e+00 <9.4e+00
<4.3e+00 <1.3e+O1 c7.8e+OO <5.4e+00 <7.7e+00
<5.3e+00 c1.7e+O1 c7.7e+00 <5.5e+00 <1.4e+Ol
<4.8e+00 <i.Oe+01 <7.1e+00 <4.8e+00 <9.3e+00
<5.0e+00 <1.Oe+O0
<8.7e+00 <5.Oe+00 <9.5e+00
<6.5e+00 <1.5e+0l <8.2e+00 <4.8e+00 <9.2e+00
<4.5e+00 <1.6e+01
<7.7e+00 <8.le+00 <1.4e+O1
<3.5e+00 <9.4e+00 <6.2e+00 <4.2e+00 <6.6e+00
<7.5e+00 <2.le+01 <1.3e+O1
<7.7e+00 c1.2e+01
<3.2e+00 <7.4e+00 <6.3e+00 <3.5e+00 <6.7e+00
<3.4e+00 <1.Oe+01 c7.0e+00 <5.3e+00 <1.4e+O1
<3.le+00 <3.2e+00 <5.7e+00
<7.2e+00 <5.4e+00 <1.2e+O1
<6.1e+00 <4.0e+00 <1.0e+01
<3.8e+00 <3.7e+00 <1.0e+O1
<3.6e+00 <3.2e+00 <6.9e+00
<7.8e+00 <5.3e+00 <1.2e+O1 c4.5e+00 <3.7e+00 <7.6e+00 c4.le+VO
<5.le+00 <9.5e+00
<3.6e+00 c4.4e+00 <8.3e+00
<5.3e+00 <5.3e+00 <1.Oe+01
<6.0e+00 <4.8e+00 <1.0e+01
<4.4e+00 <3.9e+00 <7.1e+00
<3.7e+00 <3.5e+00 <5.8e+00
<8.3e+00 <6.7e+00 <1.le+O1
<3.0e+00 <3.5e+00 <5.5e+00
<4.3e+00 <48e+00 <1.2e+O1
<6.6e+00
<1.4e+O1
<1.le+01
<1.2e+O1
<7.9e+00
<1.3e+01
<8.7e+00
<1.le+01
<9.5e+00 c1.2e+O1
<1.2e+01
<8.le+00
<6.6e+00
<1.3e+0i
<6.4e+00
<1.4e+0i 3/25/2003 6/24/2003 9/30/2003 12V30/2003 3/25/2003 6/25/2003 9/30/2003 12/3012003 N-9.8 N-9.8 N-9.8 N-9.8 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 Required LLD's 3.OOE+03 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 3.OOE+01 1.50E+01 3.OOE+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 1.80E+01 1.50E+01 1.50E+01 Reportable Levels 2.00E+04 1.OOE+03 1.00E+03 4.OOE+02 3.OOE+02 3.OOE+02 4.00E+02 4.OOE+02 2.OOE+01 3.OOE+01 5.OOE+01 2.00E+02 2.OOE+02
G.
Sediment Program Shoreline sediments were collected at four different monitoring locations.
Two sample locations are along the shore of Squaw Creek reservoir and two locations are along Lake Granbury's shores. Each sample is collected on a six-month frequency and sent to the contract laboratory for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
The process of shoreline sedimentation is a complex evolution whereby potential radionuclides and stable elements may concentrate in the bottom sediment of particular bodies of water. The concentrations are effected by such things as colloidal particles combining with chelating agents and biological action of bacteria and other benthic organisms. Monitoring of the area shorelines provides one of the first and best indicators of radionuclide deposition.
For the year 2003, results from the gamma isotopic analysis of shoreline sediments is reported in Table 10 -- 2003 Environmental Sediment Gamma Isotopic Results. As expected and in agreement with previous results from both the pre-operational and operational programs, naturally occurring Potassium-40 was detected in all eight samples. Radioactive nuclides required to be analyzed for were performed and all samples indicated less than the required LLDs. During previous years, both pre-operational and operational, positive indications occasionally had been noted for Cesium-137 and during 2003 there were two positive Cesium-137 results reported. Location N-l.0 indicated a positive value of 9.90e+00 pCi/kg which is below the required LLD and location SE-5.3 indicated a positive value of 2.04e+02 pCi/kg which is slightly above the required LLD of 1.80e+02 pCi/kg. These positive values are consistent with previous pre-operation and operational indications.. The only other positive value reported for 2003 was for naturally occurring Beryllium-7.
As expected, there were no results in any sediment sample that indicated any direct influence from CPSES discharges to the local environment.
For the year 2003, there were no exceptions to the Sediment Program.
32
Table 10 -- 2003 Environmental Sediment Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCi/kg)
Date 1121/2003 111412003 111412003 1/21/2003 Location N-1.0 N-9.9 NE-7.4 SE-5.3 Nuclides Be-7
<1.2e+02
<6.0e+01
<6.7e+01
<4.0e+02 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co.60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 1.131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 1.44E+03 2.28E+03 1.69E+03 I1.08E+04
<1.7e+01
<7.3e+O0
<9.Oe+00
<4.2e+O1
<2.1e+O1
<7.3e+00
<9.2e+00
<4.8e+01
<3.8e+01
<1.5e+O1
<1.7e+01
<9.8e+01
<2.4e+O1 <1.0e+02
<7.8e+00 <1.5e+01
<7.4e+00 <3.5e+01
<5.7e+01 <1.8e+02
<4.6e+O1
<2.3e+0l
<2.6e+O1
<8.0e+Ol
<2.3e+Ol
<1.4e+O1
<1.5e+01
<5.le+0l
<3.1e+O1
<1.2e+01
<1.4e+O1
<7.2e+01
<2.ie+01
<6.8e+O0
<1l.ge+O1
<4.7e+01 9.90E+00 <9.7e+O1
<7.5e+00 <4.0e+01
<9.le+00 <4.2e+Ol 2.04E+02 --4.8e+01
<5.3e+01
<1.9e.Ol
<2.le+01
<5.5e+01 718/2003 7/812003 71812003 71812003 N-1.0 N-9.9 NE-7.4 SE-5.3 8.30E+01
<7.8e+01
<1.4e+02 5.23E+02 I1.99E+03 3.42E+03 3.39E+03 2.45E+03
<8.4e+00
<9.3e+00
<2.0e+O1
<2.1e+01
<9.4e+00
<9.6e+00
<2.2e+Ol
<1.9e+Ol
<2.0e+01
<2.4e+01
<4.8e+O1
<4.ge+Ol
<9.3e+00 <4.4e+01
<1.0e+01 <2.4e+O1
<1.7e+O1 <9.4e+O1
<2.0e+O1 <1.1e+02
<3.7e+O1 <1.8e+01
<3.5e+02 <1.8e+01
<7.le+O1 <3.0e+01
<6.Ie+O1 <3.9e+01
<1.5e+01
<1.7e+01
<3.0e+Ol
<4.6e+O1
<8.4e+00
<8.9e+00
<1.5e+O1
<2.2e+O1
<8.6e+00
<1.Oe+01
<1.ge+01
<2.4e+01
<4.4e+O1
<4.7e+01
<1.le+02
<1.le+02
<2.3e+01
<2.6e+Ol
<5.0e.01
<5.8e+01 Required LLD's 1.50E+02 1.80E+02 Reportable Levels None None
HI.
Fish Program Fish samples were collected at two locations during the year 2003. One monitoring location is an area approximately two miles east-northeast of the site on Squaw Creek Reservoir. The second location is on Lake Granbury approximately eight miles north-northeast of the site. Fish sampling is scheduled for the months of April and October. CPSES personnel along with local State Game Wardens collect the fish from these areas. The fish are now caught using rod and reels to eliminate the killing of rough fish and extra game fish that is associated with the past method of using gill nets to obtain the required fish. The collected fish are frozen and shipped to the independent laboratory where the edible portions are analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides.
For the year 2003, the results of the analysis performed on the collected fish samples is reported in Table 11 -- 2003 Environmental Fish Gamma Isotopic Results. Catfish and bass samples were analyzed as indicated in the table. There were no positive results reported except for the expected Potassium-40, which is naturally occurring in all living organisms. All required radionuclide results were reported as less than the required LLDs.
As a result of the fish-sampling program, there were no anomalies noted and no indication of any influence on the surrounding environment from Comanche Peak plant discharges.
For the year 2003, there were no exceptions to the Fish Program.
No abnormal results were reported by CPSES or by the State of Texas and as expected, Potassium40 was the only positive isotope found. No exceptions to the Fish Program were noted.
34
Table 11 -- 2003 Environmental Fish Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCI/kg wet)
Date 4/30/2003 4130/2003 1015/2003 10/5/2003 Location Squaw Creek Squaw Creek Squaw Creek Squaw Creek Nuclides K-40 2.76E+03 3.03E+03 2.73E+03 2.92E+03 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co.60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Fish Type
<6.ge+O1
<6.0e+Ol
<2.9e+O1
<3.4e+O1
<1.Oe+02
<8.le+O1
<4.3e+Ol
<5.5e+01
<2.4e+02 <6.Oe+01
<1.8e+02 <1.4e+01
<2.2e+02 <2.5e+01
<2.3e+02 <3.ie+01
<1.5e+02 <1.6e+02 <1.4e+02
<1.8e+02 <1.2e+02 <9.4e+01
<8.6e+01 <1.Oe+02 <1.4e+02
<9.6e+01 <1.0e+02 <1.4e+02
<2.0e+03
<1.6e+03
<3.9e+04
<3.7e+04
<6.2e+0l
<7.3e+01
<2.3e+01
<3.5e+01
<6.3e+Ol
<4.3e+01
<2.8e+O1
<2.4e+O1
<5.6e+02 <6.4e+02
<4.ge+02 <5.7e+02
<2.6e+03 <3.Oe+03
<3.0e+03 <3.4e+03 Catfish Bass Catfish Bass 5/4/2003 101412003 10/12/2003 Lake Granbury 4.38E+03 Lake Granbury 2.34E+03 Lake Granbury 3.46E+03
<7.3e+01
<2.7e+01
<3.4e+01
<8.4e+0l
<7.le+01
<6.le+01
<2.6e+02 <8.9e+01
<2.5e+02 <3.6e+01
<2.5e+02 <3.le+01
<1.9e+02 <1.6e+02
<8.5e+01 <1.3e+02
<9.5e+01 <1.2e+02
<1.4e+02
<1.9e+02
<1.5e+02
<1.6e+03
<4.8e+04
<2.3e+04
<7.7e+01
<3.6e+O1
<3.0e+01
<6.8e+O1
<2.8e+01
<2.6e+01
<5.3e+02
<2.7e+03
<1.7e+03
<6.1e+02
<3.1e+03
<2.0e+03 Bass Catfish Bass Required LLD's 1.30E+02 1.30E+02 2.60E+02 1.30E+02 2.60E+02 1.30E+02 1.50E+02 1.00E+03 2.OOE+03 Reportable Levels 3.001E+04 3.001E.04 1.OOE+04 1.OOE+04 2.00OE+04
- 1.
Food Produtcts Program Food products (pecan) were collected at the time of harvest. The samples are obtained at monitoring location ENE-9.0 and are shipped to the contract laboratory for gamma isotopic analysis.
For the year 2003, results of the gamma isotopic analysis are reported in Table 12 -- 2003 Environmental Food Products Gamma Isotopic Results.
There were no gamma emitting radionuclides identified.
For the year 2003, there were exceptions to the Food Products program.
The required LLD for 1-131 is 6.00e+OlpCi/kg. The contract laboratory failed to achieve the required LLD. The contract laboratory was only able to achieve an LLD of 8.2e+01 pCi/kg. There was no detectable iodine reported at this higher detection level.
36
Table 12 -- 2003 Environmental Food Products Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCilkg wet)
Nuclides 1-131 Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Date Food Type Location 11111/2003 Pecans ENE-9.0
<6.le+O1 3.35E+03 <6.2e+00 <6.5e+00 <2.4e+01 <6.5e+00 <1.9e+O1 <1.3e+01 <9.8e+00 <6.0e+00 <6.2e+00 <3.2e+01 <3.6e+0 Required LLD's 6.00E+01 6.OOE+01 8.OOE+01 Reportable Levels 1.00E+02 1.00E+03 2.00E+03
.1.
momulefr irogrin, Broadleaf sample collection is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.
The program specifies the sampling based on the absence of milk monitoring locations. One broadleaf control location is located at SW-13.5 in the vicinity of the previous control milk location. The two indicator locations, N-1.45 and SW-1.0, are located near the site boundaries. The broadleaf samples consist of mainly native grasses and are analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma emitting isotopes.
For the year 2003, all radionuclide analyses met their required LLDs and there was no indication of any gamma emitting radionuclides being identified that were directly attributable to the operation of Comanche Peak. There were no indications of Iodine-131 being detected. The naturally occurring radionuclide of Potassium-40 was found in all 36 samples taken. The radionuclide Beryllium-7 was present in 34 of 36 samples.
For the year 2003, there were no exceptions to the Broadleaf Program.
38
Table 13 -- 2003 Environmental Broadleaf lodine-131 and Gamma Isotopic Results (Units of pCilkg wet)
Date 1128103 2127103 3125103 4129103 5127103 6124/03 7/29103 8126103 9/30103 10128103 11125/03 12130103 1/28103 2127103 3125/03 4129103 5127103 6/24103 7129103 8/26103 9130103 10/28103 11125103 12/30103 Location N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 N-1.45 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.0 SW-1.a SW-1.0 Nuclides 1-131
<2.Ie+01
<1.2e+01
<1.8e+01
<4.7e+0l
<5.1 e+01
<5.6e+01
<3.3e+01
<4.3e+01
<4.Ie+0l
<4.9e+01
<4.8e+01
<4.0e+01
<2.2e+0I
<1.5e+0l
<2.2e+0l
<2.6e+01
<5.8e+0l
<5.4e+0l
<4.2e+01
<4.9e+01
<5.4e+01
<6.0e+01
<4.9e+01
<4.5e+01 Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 3.07E+02 1.22E+03 1.52E+03 9.70E+02 1.64E+03 5.50E+03 1.27E+03 1.04E+03 2.83E+03 4.67E+03 9.00E+02 6.90E+02 5.79E+02 1.91 E+03 2.74E+03 1.72E+03 8.90E+02 9.40E+02 1.36E+03 8.90E+02 1.39E+03 3.60E+02 6.30E+02 1.43E+03 4.72E+03 2.77E+03 8.73E+03 2.14E+03 3.54E+03 2.45E+03 2.19E+03 2.41 E+03 3.35E+03 1.54E+03 3.19E+03 2.69E+03 1.48E+03 2.76E+03 2.52E+03 4.25E+03 2.47E+03 3.94E+03 2.03E+03 3.20E+03 2.52E+03 2.83E+03 2.57E+03 3.39E+03
<1.2e+01
<2.5e+01
<4.0e+01
<2.8e+01
<4.6e+01
<3.ge+01
<2.9e+0l
<5.8e+01
<1.8e+01
<3.9e+Ol
<3.2e+01
<7.3e+01
<2.2e+01
<3.2e+01
<4.le+01
<3.ge+01
<4.8e+01
<5.8e+01
<4.9e+01
<2.7e+Ol
<6.0e+01
<5.4e+Ol
<3.8e+01
<6.le+01
<1.2e+01
<2.4e+01
<3.6e+01
.<2.7e+01
<5.3e+01
<4.le+01
<2.7e+01
<5.2e+01
<2.0e+0I
<5.Ie+01
<2.9e+01
<5.2e+01
<2.3e+01
<2.ge+0I
<3.Ie+01
<4.0e+O1
<5.6e+0I
<6.3e+01
<4.7e+0l
<2.7e.0l
<5.8e+01
<8.2e+0l
<3.2e+01
<6.6e+0l
<3.0e+O1 <1.6e+01
<5.4e01 <3.0e+01
<1.0e+02 <4.0e+01
<6.9e+01 <3.6e+01
<9.6e+0l <6.6e+01
<8.7e+01 <4.9e+01
<6.5e+01 <3.6e+01
<1.6e+02 <5.7e+01
<5.6e+01 <1.9e+01
<1.3e+02 <4.4e+01
<1.2e+02 <4.9e+01
<1.8e+02 <7.2e+01
<5.le+01
<1.0e+02
<8.9e+01
<7.le+01
<I.1e+02
<1.1e+02
<7.7e+01
<1.le+02
<6.7e+0I
<1.le+02
<9.4e+01
<1.7e+02
<9.3e+01
<7.2e+01
<1.3e+02
<9.4e+01
<1.2e+02
<I.6e+02
<1.3e+02
<5.7e.0l
<1.3e+02
<2.4e+02
<I.0e+02
<1.5e+02
<2.0e+01
<4.7e+0l
<7.0e+01
<4.4e+01
<8.4e+01
<6.9e+01
<6.3e+0l
<1.1e+02
<3.5e+01
<9.7e+01
<5.8e+01
<8.8e+01
<4.le+0l
<5.3e+01
<6.0e+01
<6.6e+01
<8.5e+0I
<I.Oe+02
<8.3e+01
<4.6e+0l
<9.le+01
<1.5e+02
<8.0e+01
<1.1e+02
<1.6e+01
<3.le+01
<4.5e+01
<3.5e+0i
<6.9e+O1
<4.5e+01
<3.6e+0l
<5.ge+01
<2.7e+01
<7.2e+01
<5.0e+Ol
<7.4e+0l
<2.9e+01
<3.2e+01
<4.2e+01
<4.4e+01
<6.8e+0l
<7.Ie+01
<5.7e+01
<3.2e+01
<5.8e+01
<I.2e+02
<4.Ie+01
<7.5e+0l
<I1.2e+0l
<3.0e+01
<5.0e+01
<2.3e+01
<5.6e+01
<4.6e+01
<3.le+0l
<3.8e+01
<1.8e+0I
<4.le+01
<4.4e+01
<5.3e+0I
<2.2e+01
<2.7e+0I
<4.8e+01
<3.6e+01
<5.6e+01
<5.5e+01
<5.2e+0I
<2.9e+01
<5.5e+0I
<5.3e+01
<3.7e+01
<5.3e+0l
<1.le+01
<2.4e+01
<3.5e+0l
<2.le+01
<3.7e+01
<3.8e+01
<2.6e+01
<4.4e+01
<I.6e+01
<4.0e+01
<3.le+01
<6.0e+01
<2.3e+0l
<2.8e+01
<4.le+01
<3.0e+0l
<4.4e+01
<6.2e+0l
<4.0e+01
<2.0e+01
<5.le+01
<5.le+01
<3.4e+01
<7.0e+01
<2.4e+01
<4.4e+01
<I.Oe+02
<7.2e+01
<l.2e+02
<6.7e+01
<7.4e+0I
<2.6e+01
<5.2e+0I
<1.9e+02
<4.ge+01
<8.9e+01
<4.Ie+01
<5.5e+0l
<7.Ie+0I
<7.6e+01
<I.Ie+02
<9.3e+0I
<1.Ie+02
<5.6e+01
<I.5e+02
<3.6e+02
<4.9e+01
<I.5e+02
<2.7e+01
<5.Oe+01
<1.2e+02
<8.3e+01
<1.3e+02
<7.8e+01
<8.5e+01
<3.0e+01
<6.0e+01
<2.1 e+02
<5.7e+01
<I.Oe+02
<4.7e+01
<6.3e+01
<8.2e+01
<8.7e+01
<1.3e+02
<1.1e+02
<1.3e+02
<6.4e+01
<1.8e+02
<4.1 e+02
<5.6e+01
<1.7e+02
<5.9e+0l
<5.4e+0I
<9.8e+01
<7.1 e+O1
<1.4e+02
<1.1e+02
<1.1e+02
<7.3e+0l
<1.7e+02
<2.2e+02
<1.0e+02
<2.2e+02
<2.8e+01
<3.2e+01
<4.Ie+01
<4.3e+01
<6.1le+01
<6.7e+0i
<4.7e+01
<2.9e+0l
<4.3e+01
<5.5e+01
<4.9e+01
<6.5e+0l 1128103 2127/03 3125/03 4/29/03 5127103 6/24/03 7/29/03 8/26103 9/30/03 10/28/03 11125103 12/30103 Control SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-1 3.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5 SW-13.5
<3.3e+01
<7.4e+00
<1.6e+01
<2.9e+01
<5.5e+01
<5.8e+01
<4.7e+0I
<3.7e+01
<3.8e+01
<4.8e+01
<4.2e+0I
<3.9e+01 4.82E+02 1.00E+03 6.21 E+02 2.40E+02 2.01 E+03 1.32E+03
<3.4e+02 9.10E+02 6.70E+02
<4.9e+02 1.03E+03 1.03E+03 6.33E+03 4.45E+03 6.11 E+03 3.72E+03 3.58E+03 2.49E+03 5.00E+03 2.59E+03 4.56E+03 4.69E+03 8.80E+03 7.12E+03
<1.3e+01
<4.0e+01
<3.0e+01
<4.0e+01
<3.4e+01
<2.0e+01
<4.7e+01
<2.ge+01
<4.le+01
<4.7e+01
<5.3e+01
<6.5e+01
<1.4e+0l
<3.9e+01
<3.8e+01
<3.5e+01
<3.9e+0i
<2.3e+01
<4.7e+0l
<3.0e+0l
<6.2e+01
<6.4e+0I
<5.5e+0l
<6.7e+01
<3.3e+01
<9.8e+01
<9.8e+01
<8.5e+01
<1.Ie+02
<4.2e+01
<1.3e+02
<9.2e+01
<1.4e+02
<1.6e+02
<1.3e+02
<2.2e+02
<1.8e+01
<3.2e+0l
<3.8e+01
<5.4e+01
<4.3e+01
<2.6e+01
<5.0e+01
<3.2e+0l
<6.6e+01
<4.8e+01
<5.3e+01
<6.0e+01
<1.6e+02
<8.6e+01
<1.Oe+02
<9.2e+0l
<5.4e+01
<1.le+02
<1.1e+02
<6.0e+01
<1.5e+02
<2.1e+02
<2.le+01
<6.6e+01
<7.5e+01
<7.0e+01
<6.le+01
<3.6e+01
<8.8e+01
<6.0e+0l
<1.5e+02
<1.Ie+02
<9.3e+01
<I1.4e+02
<2.3e+0I
<5.3e+0l
<3.6e+01
<5.0e+01
<5.4e+0I
<2.5e+01
<6.5e+01
<3.8e+01
<6.9e+0I
<9.2e+01
<6.0e+01
<8.4e+0I
<1.4e+0l
<3.5e+01
<3.6e+01
<3.5e+01
<4.0e+01
<2.0e+01
<5.1 e+01
<3.7e+01
<5.9e+01
<5.1 e+01
<5.6e+01
<4.7e+01
<1.5e+01
<3.le+01
<2.7e+01
<3.6e+01
<3.6e+01
<1.7e+0l
<4.5e+01
<3.2e+01
<5.6e+01
<3.ge+0I
<5.le+01
<5.2e+01
<2.3e+01
<6.4e+01
<5.3e+01
<7.2e+0l
<9.3e+0l
<3.6e+01
<1.4e+02
<5.2e+01
<1.9e+02
<1.7e+02
<8.2e+0I
<1.7e+02
<2.7e+01
<7.4e+01
<6.Ie+01
<8.3e+01
<1.Ie+02
<4.Ie+01
<1.6e+02
<5.ge+0l
<2.2e+02
<2.0e+02
<9.4e+01
<2.0e+02
<5.7e+01 <2.1e+02 Required LLD's 6.002+01 6.00E+01 8.002+01 Reportable Levels 1.00E+02 1.00E+03 2.OOE+03
K.
Conclu0sions For the year 2003, based on the results presented in this report and from comparisons with the pre-operational and operational program results from previous years, it can be concluded that the impact of Comanche Peak on the environment is very small. The only indication directly attributable to Comanche Peak is the tritium detected in Squaw Creek reservoir.
Gross beta trend indications conceming Squaw Creek Reservoir is consistent with 2002 values and do not indicated any increase due to influence from Comanche Peak. The current levels have been seen in pre-operational data but are now very consistent and may be at an equilibrium value that will continue in water samples from this location. Future data will be evaluated as it is received and changes will be addressed as necessary.
The atmospheric environment was sampled for airborne particulate matter, radioiodine and direct radiation. The terrestrial environment was sampled using groundwater, surface drinking water, food products and broadleaf vegetation. The aquatic environment was sampled using surface water, fish and shoreline sediments. The analyses of all these samples provided results that were below the measurement detection limits, or were indicative of natural terrestrial and cosmic ray radiation levels, except for the tritium in the water samples of Squaw Creek reservoir. The tritium in Squaw Creek reservoir is reaching equilibrium and is expected to remain well below the reportable level.
There were no values reported during the year 2003 that exceeded any NRC reportable limit.
Intcrliaboriatory Coniparison andl Cross Check Program Framatome ANP Environmental Laboratory is the independent contract laboratory that processes the radiological environmental monitoring samples collected by CPSES. The contract laboratory is required to participate in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program in accordance with the ODCM Control 3.12.3. Framatome participates in multiple programs to ensure all environmental media sent to them are analyzed to the proper standards.
Framatome recently published "Semi-Annual Quality Assurance Status Report January-June 2003"and "Semi-Annual Quality Assurance Status 40
Report July-December 2003"which included current interlaboratory comparison results and two year trends as appropriate. These reports explain the Quality Control Program used by Framatome during their respective time periods. Interlaboratory and third party quality control programs included the Environmental Crosscheck Program administered by Analytics, Inc., the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Measurement Assurance Program (MAP), the Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) Proficiency Test (PT), the Department of Energy (DOE) Quality Assessment Program (QAP) and the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP). Framatome also conducts an internal Quality Control Program that includes QC functions such as instrumentation checks, blank samples, instrumentation backgrounds, duplicates, staff qualification analysis and process controls.
There were no external surveillances or audits performed during the first semi-annual period. The triennial NUPIC audit led by PPL Susquehanna, LLC was conducted as well as an internal QA audit during the second semi-annual reporting period. Both audits were satisfactory.
Extensive details of the results of the various interlaboratory and cross check programs are contained in the reports mentioned above. A summary of each reporting period is reported below:
During the first semi-annual reporting period, there were 26 nuclides associated with various media types analyzed by means of the Laboratory's internal process control, DOE, NIST, ERA and Analytics quality control programs.
The Analytics Cross Check Program provided 167 individual environmental analyses for bias and 65 for precision. 97.6% fell within the Laboratory's acceptance criteria for bias and 100% were within tolerance limits for precision.
The ERA Program provided a total of 12 mean results evaluated by ERA with an 81.3% agreement.
Of the 216 internal process control analyses evaluated for bias, 96.8% met Laboratory acceptance criteria. Also, 98.6% of the 70 results for precision were found acceptable.
All 53 QC charcoals evaluated during this period reported positive activity as expected.
1 of the 143 environmental analytical blanks analyzed reported positive activity greater than 3 times the standard deviation.
41
None of backgrounds processed reported activity above the 3 times the standard deviation limit..
The cumulative bias for the three programs evaluated to the internal Laboratory's performance criteria shows 97.1% of the 383 individual results fell within acceptance criteria for bias while 99.6% of the 235analyses fell within the acceptance criteria for precision.
A review was performed of all Condition Reports (CR) listed in the report.
27 CRs were closed during this period and 18 CRs were issued. No adverse trend can be detected and the Laboratory is pursuing resolution of all open CRs.
During the second semi-annual reporting period, there were 27 nuclides associated with various media types analyzed by means of the Laboratory's internal process control, DOE, NIST, ERA and Analytics quality control programs.
The Analytics Cross Check Program provided 154 individual environmental analyses for bias and 152 for precision. 100% fell within the Laboratory's acceptance criteria for bias and 100% were within tolerance limits for precision.
The ERA Program provided a total of 12 mean results evaluated by ERA with an 85.7% agreement.
Of the 298 internal process control analyses evaluated for bias, 99.3% met Laboratory acceptance criteria. Also, 100% of the 123 results for precision were found acceptable.
All 72 QC charcoals evaluated during this period reported positive activity as expected.
None of the 191 environmental analytical blanks analyzed reported positive activity greater than 3 times the standard deviation.
None of the backgrounds processed reported any activity above the 3 times the standard deviation limit.
LQCAC blind duplicates resulted in greater than 99.6% of all paired measurements meeting the LQCAC acceptance criteria.
The cumulative bias for the three programs evaluated to the internal Laboratory's performance criteria shows 99.6% of the 458 individual results fell within acceptance criteria for bias while 100% of the 281 analyses fell within the acceptance criteria for precision.
42
A review was performed of all Condition Reports (CR) listed in the report.
12 CRs were closed during this period and 11 CRs were issued. No adverse trend can be detected and the Laboratory is pursuing resolution of all open CRs.
The independent laboratory, Framatome, satisfies the requirements of the ODCM by their participation in the interlaboratory and cross check programs documented in their semi-annual reports.
43
Appendix A Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Land Use Census 2003 COPY 44
June 24, 2003 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LAND USE CENSUS 2003 The Land Use Census identified receptors within a five (5) mile radius of the plant in each of the sixteen (16) meteorological sectors. The Land Use Census was conducted June 13,2003 and June 16, 2002 and includes the following items:
- 1.
Evaluation of the 2003 Land Use Census
- 2.
Nearest Resident by Sector, Distance, X/Q and D/Q
- 3.
Nearest Garden by Sector, Distance and D/Q
- 4.
Nearest Milk Animal by Sector, Distance and D/Q
- 5.
Population by Sector and Distance
- 6.
Environmental Sample Locations Table
- 7.
Environmental Monitoring Locations Map-2 Mile Radius
- 8.
Environmental Monitoring Locations Map-20 Mile Radius*
- 9.
5 Mile Sector and Road Map with Field Data*
- These maps are vaulted along with this census, copies of this census will not contain a copy of these maps unless specifically requested..
I
Evaluation of the 2003 Land Use Census The results of the 2003 Land Use Census were reviewed for impact on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). The specific areas reviewed, that could be affected by changes found in the land use census, were the sampling requirements for milk, broadleaf vegetation and food products.
Reviewing the milk sampling requirements from the ODCM Table 3.12-1 requires that samples are to be obtained from milking animals in three locations within a 5 km distance having the highest potential dose. If none are available, samples are acceptable from milking animals in locations 5 to 8 km distance where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year. A sample is also required at a control location. There are currently no identified milking animals (cow or goat) within the specified distances therefore, there will be no milk sampled during the year 2003.
Since not all milk samples are available, the broadleaf vegetation sampling specified in ODCM Table 3.12-1 is being performed. Broadleaf sample requirements are such that samples of broadleaf vegetation are to be collected from each of two offsite locations of the highest predicted annual average D/Q if milk sampling is not performed at all the required locations. Currently, broadleaf vegetation samples are collected at two indicator locations (N - 1.45 and SW - 1.0) and one control location (SW - 13.5). These indicator locations are near the site boundary in sectors where broadleaf vegetation is available and D/Q is high. Therefore, no change to the broadleaf sampling program is required.
Food product sample requirements of ODCM Table 3.12-1 requires that one sample of each principal class of food product be collected from any area that is irrigated with water in which liquid plant waste has been discharged. Of the gardens identified in the land use census, no gardens are located in any area that irrigates with water in which liquid plant wastes are discharged. Currently, food products are sampled from one indicator location (ENE - 9.0) when in season. The indicator location for ENE-9.0 for pecans at time of harvest will be continued since it is a major source of food 2
products sold to the public.
The 2003 Land Use Census did not identify any locations that are "available for sampling" and that would yield a calculated dose 20% greater than at the current sampling locations.
Calculated values for the associated X/Q and D/Q values for each controlling receptor location and pathway are included along with the receptor distances in the data tables of this land use census. The values used to determine potential dose due to radioactive effluent discharges are the highest calculated values based on annual average values.
The annual average X/Q used for dose calculations is 3.30E-6, tritium X/Q is 4.36E-6, and the D/Q value is 3.34 E-8. All these values are conservative based on the 2003 Land Use Census data and therefore no changes are required in the dose calculation parameters as verified by the field data.
- X/Q units are Sec/cubic meter
- D/Q units are inverse square meters 3
Nearest Resident by Sector, Distance, X/Q and D/Q
[Sector Distance (Miles) l X/Q l D/Q N
2.2 9.28E-07 5.32E-09 NNE 2.2 5.58E-07 2.90E-09 NE 2.2 3.92E-07 1.42E-09 ENE 2.4 2.58E-07 7.08E-10 E
2.4 3.02E-07 6.62E-10 ESE 2.0 4.70E-07 1.20E-09 SE 1.9 8.30E-07 3.40E-09 SSE 1.5 l.lOE-06 6.60E-09 S
1.5 8.50E-07 5.20E-09 SSW 2.2 3.24E-07 1.41E-09 SW 1.1 1.40E-06 5.50E-09 WSW 1.0 1.80E-06 6.50E-09 W
1.6 7.64E-07 2.50E-09 WNW 3.0 3.76E-07 1.07E-09 NW 2.7 6.98E-07 2.24E-09 NNW 2.8 5.28E-07 2.10E-09 Note: The Annual Average X/Q used for dose calculations is 3.30E-06 sec/cubic meter.
The Tritium value X/Q used for dose calculations is 4.36E-06 sec/cubic meter.
The Annual Average D/Q used for dose calculations is 3.34E-08 inverse square meters.
4
Nearest Garden by Sector, Distance and D/Q E
Sector Distance (Miles)
D/Q N
3.4 2.90E-09 NNE 2.5 2.30E-09 NE 2.4 1.14E-09 ENE 2.4 7.08E-10 E
2.4 6.62E-10 ESE 3.3 3.96E-10 SE 3.8 6.26E-10 SSE 1.9 3.88E-09 S
2.1 2.28E-09 SSW 4.5 2.60E-10 SW 1.5 2.50E-09 WSW 1.2 4.78E-09 W
3.3 4.42E-10 WNW 3.0 1.04E-09 NW None None NNW None None 5
Nearest Milk Animal by Sector, Distance and D/Q Sector Distance (Miles) l D/Q N
None None NNE None None NE None None ENE None None E
None None ESE None None SE None None SSE None None S
None None SSW None None SW None None WSW None None W
None None WNW None None NW None None NNW None None 6
i 7
I Population by Sector and Distance
[ Sector ll 0-1 l
1-2 l
2-3 l
3-4 l
4-5 l
Total N
3 32 109 144 NNE 27 88 19 134 NE 70 136 261 467 ENE 56 6
27 89 E
96 174 24 294 ESE 48 78 157 283 SE 11 120 80 78 289 SSE 70 67 59 2127 2323 S
30 83 43 187 343 SSW 8
6 48 62 SW 99 6
57 51 213 WSW 232 3
19 254 W
11 14 24 19 68 WNW 43 64 107 NW 3
3 6
NNW 3
46 32 81 TOTAL 453 607 891 3206 5157 Based on an average of 2.66 residents per house. This average was obtained from North Central Texas Council of Governments for Hood and Somervell Counties and is derived from an average residents per house of 2.57 and 2.74, respectively.
7
Environmental Sample Locations Table Sampling Point Location Sample Type*
Al N-1.45 (Squaw Creek Park)
A A2 N-9.4 (Granbury)
A A3 E-3.5 (Children's Home)
A A4 SSE-4.5 (Glen Rose)
A A5 S/SSW-1.2 A
A6 SW-12.3 (CONTROL)
A A7 SW/WSW-0.95 A
A8 NW-1.0 A
RI N-1.45 (Squaw Creek Park)
R R2 N-4.4 R
R3 N-6.5 R
R4 N-9.4 (Granbury)
R R5 NNE-l.l R
R6 NNE-5.65 R
R7 NE-1.7 R
R8 NE-4.8 R
R9 ENE-2.5 R
RIO ENE-5.0 R
R11 E-0.5 R
R12 E-1.9 R
R13 E-3.5 (Children's Home)
R R14 E-4.2 R
R15 ESE-1.4 R
R16 ESE-4.7 R
R17 SE-1.3 R
R18 SE-3.85 R
8
Environmental Sample Locations Table (cont.)
Sampling Point Location Sample Type*
R19 SE-4.6 R
R20 SSE-1.3 R
R21 SSE-4.4 (Glen Rose)
R R22 SSE-4.5 (Glen Rose)
R R23 S-1.5 R
R24 S-4.2 R
R25 SSW-l.l R
R26 SSW-4.4 (State Park)
R R27 SW-0.9 R
R28 SW-4.8 (Girl Scout Camp)
R R29 SW-12.3 (CONTROL)
R R30 WSW-1.0 R
R31 WSW-5.35 R
R32 WSW-7.0 (CONTROL)
R R33 W-1.0 R
R34 W-2.0 R
R35 W-5.5 R
R36 WNW-1.0 R
R37 WNW-5.0 R
R38 WNW-6.7 R
R39 NW-1.0 R
R40 NW-5.7 R
R41 NW-9.9 (Tolar)
R R42 NNW-1.35 R
R43 NNW-4.6 R
9
Environmental Sample Locations Table (cont.)
Sampling Point Location Sample Type*
SWI N-1.5 (Squaw Creek Reservoir Marina)
SW SW2 N-9.9 (Lake Granbury)
SW/DW' SW3 N-19.3 (CONTROL-Brazos River)
SW SW4 NE-7.4 (Lake Granbury)
SW SW5 ESE-1.4 (Squaw Creek Reservoir)
SW2 SW6 NNW-0. 1 (Squaw Creek Reservoir)
SW/DW3 GWl W-1.2 (NOSF Potable Water)
GW GW2 WSW-0.l (Plant Potable Water)
GW3'4 GW3 SSE-4.6 (Glen Rose)
GW4 GW4 N-9.8 (Granbury)
GV-4 GW5 N-1.45 (Squaw Creek Park)
GW4 SS1 NNE-1.0 (Squaw Creek Reservoir)
SS SS2 N-9.9 (Lake Granbury)
SS SS3 NE-7.4 (Lake Granbury)
SS Fl ENE-2.0 (Squaw Creek Reservoir)
F F2 NNE-8.0 (Lake Granbury)
F FPI ENE-9.0 (Leonard Bros. Pecan Farm)
FP 10
Environmental Sample Locations Table (cont.)
Sampling Point Location Sample Type*
BLI N-1.45 BL BL2 SW-1.0 BL5 BL3 SW-13.5 (CONTROL)
BL5
- Sample Type: A - Air Sample; R - Direct Radiation; SW - Surface Water; DW - Drinking Water GW - Ground Water; SS - Shoreline Sediments; M - Milk; F - Fish; FP - Food Products; BL - Broadleaf Vegetation NOTES: 1) The municipal water system for the City of Granbury is supplied by surface water from Lake Granbury (location SW2) and ground water (location GW4). Each of these supplies is sampled. These samples are not required for compliance with Radiological Effluent Control 3/4.12.1, Table 3.12-1, because they are not affected by plant discharges.
- 2) This sample (location SW6) is representative of discharges from Squaw Creek Reservoir both down Squaw Creek and to Lake Granbury via the return line to Lake Granbury if used.
- 3) Plant potable water could be supplied by surface water from Squaw Creek Reservoir (location SW6) but is normally supplied by ground water from onsite wells (location GW2). Each of these possible sources of water are sampled.
- 4) Ground water supplies in the plant site area are not affected by plant liquid effluents as discussed in CPSES FSAR Section 2.4.13 and are therefore not required to be monitored for radioactivity to meet the requirements of the Radiological Effluent Control 3/4.12.1, Table 3.12-1.
- 5) Broadleaf sampling will be performed at the specified locations if milk samples are unavailable from any location.
11