ML040770611

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:26, 18 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail MSIV Leakage Pathway RAI & License Amendment Request - Attachment 3
ML040770611
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/2003
From: Victor W
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
To: Michelle Honcharik
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML040820686 List:
References
Download: ML040770611 (3)


Text

3ATEMP\ 3W)0001.TMPP Page 1,1 Mlail Envelope Proper-ties (3FE73E05.D06: 11: 19718)

Subject:

RE: FW: FILE Creation Date: 12/22/03 1:54PM From: "Victor, William R." <wrvicto@nppd.com>

Created By: wrvicto@nppd.com Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.0WFN_DO MCH3 (Michelle Honcharik) nppd.com elmccut CC (McCutchen, Edward L.)

Post Office Route owf4_po.OWFN_DO nrc.gov nppd.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1776 12/22/03 01:54PM Mime.822 2869 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard

Michelle Honcharik - RE: FW: FILE Pagq~l11~

From: "Victor, William R." <wrvicto@nppd.com>

To: "Michelle Honcharik" <MCH3©nrc.gov>

Date: 12/22103 1:55PM

Subject:

RE: FW: FILE Michelle, You are correct. The words should be "...the effects of permanent approval on the margin of safety are bounded by the previous safety conclusions of License Amendment 196." My apologies on this. It appears to have been a cut and paste problem from Question 1. Please advise if you will require a replacement page, or whether this e-mail clarification will suffice.

R/ Bill Victor CNS Licensing

-Original Message-----

From: Michelle Honcharik @nrc.gov

Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:26 PM To: McCutchen, Edward L.

Cc: Victor, William R.; Victor Nerses

Subject:

Re: FW: FILE Ed, I have a question about a phrase on page 12 of 17 to Attachment 1.

In the last sentence of the second paragraph of the response to number 3 - should the phrase "... the effects of permanent approval on the probability or consequences of an accident are ..." be replaced with N... the effects of permanent approval on the margin of safety are ..."?

It seemed to me to be a cut and paste error, since the wording used in response to number 3 is very similar to that of number 1 (on page 11 of 17).

Regards, Michelle Honcharik NRR/DLPM/PDIV-1 415-1774

,> "Victor, William R." <wrvicto nppd.com> 12/11/03 08:57AM ,>>

Michelle, Here is the pdf file of the MSIV Leakage Pathway RAls and License Amendment Request that was recently signed and mailed. Any questions, give me a call (402) 825-5818.

R/

Bill Victor CNS Licensing P.S.- I will be out of the office after today until 12/22.


Original Message-----

> From: Rech, Lynn M.

> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:46 AM

> To: Victor, William R.

Subject:

FILE

Michelle Honcharik - RE: FW: FILE Page 2:1

> >> <<NLS2003105.pdf>>

> Lynn Rech

> Nuclear Support

> Licensing

> x2813 CC: "McCutchen, Edward L." <elmccut@nppd.com>